Frontline Employees’ Attitude Toward Embodied Social Robots In Customer Service: An Integrative Framework And Empirical Test

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: SMR - Journal of Service Management Research Jahrgang 6 (2022), Heft 4
Kein Zugriff

SMR - Journal of Service Management Research

Jahrgang 6 (2022), Heft 4

Autor:innen:
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
ISSN-Online
2942-3392
ISSN-Print
2511-8676

Kapitelinformationen

Kein Zugriff

Jahrgang 6 (2022), Heft 4

Frontline Employees’ Attitude Toward Embodied Social Robots In Customer Service: An Integrative Framework And Empirical Test

Im Shop erwerben
Autor:innen:
, , ,
ISSN-Print
2511-8676
ISSN-Online
2942-3392
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Blaurock, M., Čaić, M., Okan, M., and Henkel, A. P. (2022a). A transdisciplinary review and framework of consumer interactions with embodied social robots: Design, delegate, and deploy. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol 46, 1877-1899. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Blaurock, M., Čaić, M., Okan, M. and Henkel, A.P. (2022b), "Robotic role theory: an integrative review of human–robot service interaction to advance role theory in the age of social robots", Journal of Service Management, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 27-49. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Bowen, D. E. (2016), “The changing role of employees in service theory and practice: an interdisciplinary view”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 4-13. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Brougham, D. and Haar, J. (2018), “Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): employees’ perceptions of our future workplace”, Journal of Management and Organization, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 239-257. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W. (1959), “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 81-105. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Choi, Y., Choi, M., Oh, M., and Kim, S. (2020). Service robots in hotels: understanding the service quality perceptions of human-robot interaction. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(6), 613-635. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-340. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models”, Management science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982-1003. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. De Graaf, M. M. and Ben Allouch, S. (2013), “Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 61 No. 12, pp. 1476-1486. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. De Keyser, A., Köcher, S., Alkire (née Nasr), L., Verbeeck, C. and Kandampully, J. (2019), “Frontline Service Technology infusion: conceptual archetypes and future research directions”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 156-183. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. De Keyser, A. and Kunz, W.H. (2022), "Living and working with service robots: a TCCM analysis and considerations for future research", Journal of Service Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 165-196. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. De Witte, H. (2000). “Work ethic and job insecurity: assessment and consequences for well-being, satisfaction and performance at work”, in Bowen, R., De Witte, K., De Witte, H., Taillieu, T. (Ed.s.), From Group to Community, Garant, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 325–350. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981), “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 328-388. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C. and Sarstedt, M. (2017), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Sage Publications Limited Inc, London, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 2-24. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Hameed, I. A., Tan, Z. H., Thomsen, N. B. and Duan, X. (2016), “User acceptance of social robots”, in proceedings of ACHI 2016: The Ninth international conference on advances in computer-human interactions, Venice, Italy, pp. 274-279. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Heaney, C., Israel, B. and House, J. (1994), “Chronic job insecurity among automobile workers: effects on job satisfaction and health”, Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 38 No. 10, pp. 1431-1437. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V. and Wielinga, B. (2009), “Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit”, in proceedings of RO-MAN 2009: The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, pp. 528-533. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Hellgren, J., Sverke, M. and Isaksson, K. (1999), “A two-dimensional approach to job insecurity: consequences for employee attitudes and well-being”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 179-195. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Henkel, A.P., Bromuri, S., Iren, D. and Urovi, V. (2020), “Half human, half machine – augmenting service employees with AI for interpersonal emotion regulation”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 247-265. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sinkovics, R.R. (2009), “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing”, in Sinkovics, R.R., & Pervez, G.N. (Eds), Advances in International Marketing, Emerald, Bingley, pp. 277-319. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Honig, S.S. and Oron-Gilad, T. (2018), “Understanding and resolving failures in human-robot interaction: literature review and model development”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9 June, pp. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Huang, M.-H. and Rust, R.T. (2018), “Artificial intelligence in service”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 155-172. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. International Federation of Robotics (2021), “Executive summary world robotics 2021 service robots”, available at: https://ifr.org/img/worldrobotics/Executive_Summary_WR_Service_Robots_2021.pdf (accessed September 5, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Jörling, M., Böhm, R. and Paluch S. (2019), “Service robots: drivers of perceived responsibility for service outcomes”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 404-420. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Keating, B. W., McColl-Kennedy, J. R. and Solnet, D. (2018), “Theorizing beyond the horizon: service research in 2050”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 766–775. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Larivière, B., Bowen, D., Andreassen, T.W., Kunz, W., Sirianni, N.J., Voss, C., Wünderlich, N.V. and De Keyser, A. (2017), “Service encounter 2.0: An investigation into the roles of technology, employees and customers”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 79, pp. 238-246. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Lu, L., Cai, R. and Gursoy, D. (2019), “Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 80 July, pp. 36-51. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Lu, V. N., Wirtz, J., Kunz, W. H., Paluch, S., Gruber, T., Martins, A. and Patterson, P. G. (2020), “Service robots, customers and service employees: what can we learn from the academic literature and where are the gaps?”, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 361-391. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Malhotra, N., Birks, D., and Nunan, D. (2017), Marketing Research: An Applied Approach, 5th ed., Pearson Education, London. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Meyer, P., Jonas, J. M. and Roth, A. (2020), “Frontline employees’ acceptance of and resistance to service robots in stationary retail–an exploratory interview study”, Journal of Service Management Research, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 21-34. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Nam, T. (2019), “Technology usage, expected job sustainability, and perceived job insecurity”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 138, pp. 155-165. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Odekerken-Schröder, G., Mennens, K., Steins, M. and Mahr, D. (2022). The service triad: an empirical study of service robots, customers and frontline employees. Journal of Service Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 246-292. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Paluch, S., Tuzovic, S., Holz, H. Kies, A. and Jörling, M. (2022) “My colleague is a robot’ - exploring frontline employees’ willingness to work with collaborative service robots”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 363-388. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Parasuraman, A. and Colby, C. L. (2015), “An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 59-74. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Park, E. and Del Pobil, A. P. (2013), “Users' attitudes toward service robots in South Korea”, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 77-87. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Pitardi, V., Wirtz, J., Paluch, S. and Kunz, W.H. (2022), "Service robots, agency and embarrassing service encounters", Journal of Service Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 389-414. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D.W. (1986), “Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects”, Journal of Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 531-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 879-903. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008), “Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models”, Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 879-91. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M. and Straub, D. (2012), “A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 3-14. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Savela, N., Turja, T. and Oksanen, A. (2018), “Social acceptance of robots in different occupational fields: a systematic literature review”, International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 493-502. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Schepers, J., and Streukens, S. (2022). To Serve and Protect: A Typology of Service Robots and Their Role in Physically Safe Services. Journal of Service Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 197-209. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Shah, N., Irani, Z. and Sharif, A.M. (2017), “Big data in an HR Context: exploring organizational change readiness, employee attitudes and behaviors”, Journal of Business Research, Vol 70, pp. 366–378. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Stock, R. M. and Merkle, M. (2017), “A service robot acceptance model: user acceptance of humanoid robots during service encounters”, in proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), IEEE, Hawaii, USA, pp. 339-344. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Subramony, M., Solnet, D., Groth, M., Hartley, N., Kim, P., Yagil, D. and Golubovskaya, M. (2018), “Service work in 2050: a work ecosystems perspective”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 956-974. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Nobble, S.M., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A.L., Grewal, D. and Petersen, J.A. (2017), “Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 43-58. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Wirtz, J., Patterson, P.G., Kunz, W.H., Gruber, T., Lu, V.N., Paluch, S. and Martins, A. (2018), “Brave new world: service robots in the frontline”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 907-931. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Xiao, L., and Kumar, V. (2021). Robotics for Customer Service: A Useful Complement or an Ultimate Substitute? Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 9-29. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. You, S. and Robert, L. (2018), “Human-robot similarity and willingness to work with a robotic co-worker”, in proceedings of 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Chicago, USA, pp. 251-260.break-after Google Scholar öffnen

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex
Kein Zugriff
Sie haben keinen Zugriff auf diesen Inhalt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien