The impact of smart wearables on the decisional autonomy of vulnerable persons

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos


Cover des Buchs: Künstliche Intelligenz, Demokratie und Privatheit
Open Access Vollzugriff

Künstliche Intelligenz, Demokratie und Privatheit


Autor:innen:
Reihe
Privatheit und Selbstbestimmung in der digitalen Welt | Privacy and Self-Determination in the Digital World
Band
1
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7327-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1334-4

Kapitelinformationen


Open Access Vollzugriff

The impact of smart wearables on the decisional autonomy of vulnerable persons


Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7327-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1334-4


Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis


  1. Altman, I. (1975): The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, CA: Cole Publishing Company. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  2. Ashworth, L. and Free, C. (2006): Marketing Dataveillance and Digital Privacy: Using Theories of Justice to Understand Consumers’ Online Privacy Concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 107-123. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  3. Belanger, F. and Crossler, R. E. (2011): Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017-1041. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  4. Blöser, C., Schöpf, A., and Willaschek, M. (2010): Autonomy, experience, and reflection. On a neglected aspect of personal autonomy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13(3), 239-253. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  5. Bower, M. and Sturman, D. (2015): What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? Computers & Education, 88, 343-353. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  6. Carter, J. A. (2018): Virtue Epistemology, Enhancement, and Control. Metaphilosophy, 49(3), 283-304. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  7. Centre for Child Protection on the Internet (2015): The Intelligent Risk Management Model. URL: <https://childrens-rights.digital/hintergrund/index.cfm/topic.279/key.1497> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  8. Deary, I. J., Corley, J., Gow, A. J., Harris, S. E., Houlihan, L. M., Marioni, R. E., Penke, L., Rafnsson, S. B., and Starr, J. M. (2009): Age-associated cognitive decline. British Medical Bulletin, 92(1), 135-152. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  9. Debatin, B. (2011): Ethics, Privacy, and Self-Restraint in Social Networking. In Trepte S and Reinecke L (Eds.), Privacy Online (pp. 47-61), Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  10. Dian, J. F., Vahidnia, R., and Rahmati, A. (2020): Wearables and the Internet of Things (IoT), Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges: A Survey. In IEEE Access, 8, 69200-69211. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  11. Dunn, T. and Risko, E. F. (2016): Toward a Metacognitive Account of Cognitive Offloading. Psychology, Medicine, Computer Science, 40(5), 1080-1127. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  12. Durso, F. T., Rawson, K. A., and Girotto, S. (2007): Comprehension and Situation Awareness. In Durso F, Nickerson R, Dumais S, Lewandowsky S, and Perfect T (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Cognition: 2nd Edition (pp. 163-193), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  13. Edwards, W. (1954): The reliability of probability-preferences. The American Journal of Psychology, 67(1), 68-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  14. Endsley, M. R. (1995): Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human factors, 37(1), 65-84. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  15. European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). In: Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 04 May 2016, S. 1-88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  16. European Commission (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels. Available at: <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206> [accessed 12 May 2022] Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  17. Feinberg, J. (1983): Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Privacy: Moral Ideals in the Constitution. Notre Dame Law Review, 58(3), 445-492. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  18. Felsen, G., Castelo, N., and Reiner, P. B. (2013): Decisional enhancement and autonomy: Public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 202-213. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  19. Fuller, C. S. (2019): Is the market for digital privacy a failure? Public Choice, 180, 353-381. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  20. Graf, W. D., Nagel, S. K., Epstein, L. G., Miller, G., Nass, R., and Larriviere, D. (2013): Pediatric neuroenhancement: Ethical, legal, social, and neurodevelopmental implications. Neurology, 80(13), 1251-1260. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  21. Grune-Yanoff, T. (2012): Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles. Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 635-645. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  22. Hamilton, K. A. and Yao, M. Z. (2018): Cognitive Offloading and the Extended Digital Self. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Human Issues. HCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10901. Springer, Cham. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  23. Heersmink, R. and Carter, J. A. (2020): The philosophy of memory technologies: Metaphysics, knowledge, and values. Memory Studies, 13(4), 416-433. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  24. IDTechEx Research (2021): Wearable Technology Forecasts: A comprehensive review of market opportunities across all wearable electronic devices, from smartwatches to skin patches, AR, VR & MR to hearables, smart clothing to smart eyewear, and more. URL: <https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/wearable-technology-forecasts-2021-2031/839> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  25. Jovanović, M. and Schmitz, M. (2022): Explainability as a User Requirement for Artificial Intelligence Systems. Computer, 55(2), 90-94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  26. Köhler, S., Roughley, N., and Sauer, H. (2017): Technologically blurred accountability? Technology, responsibility gaps and the robustness of our everyday conceptual scheme. In Ulbert C, Finkenbusch P, Sondermann E, and Debiel T (Eds.), Moral Agency and the Politics of Responsibility (pp. 51-68). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  27. Kop, M. (2021): EU Artificial Intelligence Act: The European Approach to AI. Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments. Stanford Law School. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  28. Kutscher, N. (2015): Internet ist gleich mit Essen - Empirische Studie zur Nutzung digitaler Medien durch unbegleitete minderjährige Flüchtlinge. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287209029_Internet_ist_gleich_mit_Essen_-_Empirische_Studie_zur_Nutzung_digitaler_Medien_durch_unbegleitete_minderjahrige_Fluchtlinge Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  29. Levy, N. (2017): Nudges in a post-truth world. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43, 495-500. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  30. Lewis, J. E. and Neider, M. B. (2017): Designing Wearable Technology for an Aging Population. Ergonomics in Design, 25(3), 4-10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  31. Moles, A. (2015): Nudging for Liberals. Social Theory and Practice, 41(4), 644-667. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  32. Nagel, S. K. and Reiner, P. B. (2018): Skillful Use of Technologies of the Extended Mind Illuminate Practical Paths Toward an Ethics of Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1251. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  33. Niknejad, N., Ismail, W. B., Mardani, A., Liao, H., and Ghani, I. (2020): A comprehensive overview of smart wearables: The state of the art literature, recent advances, and future challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 90, 103529. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  34. Niker, F., Felsen, G., Nagel, S. K., and Reiner, P. B. (2021): Autonomy, Evidence-Responsiveness, and the Ethics of Influence. In M. Blitz and J.C. Bublitz (Eds.), Neuroscience and the Future of Freedom of Thought. Hampshire: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  35. Ometov, A., Shubina, V., Klus, L., Skibińska, J., Saafi, S., Pascacio, P., Flueratoru, L., Gaibor, D. Q., Chukhno, N., Chukhno, O., Ali, A., Channa, A., Svertoka, E., Qaim, W. B., Casanova-Marqués, R., Holcer, S., Torres-Sospedra, J., Casteleyn, S., Ruggeri, G., Araniti, G., Burget, R., Hosek, J., and Lohan, E. S. (2021): A Survey on Wearable Technology: History, State-of-the-Art and Current Challenges. Computer Networks, 193, 1-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  36. Pateman, C. (2002). Self-Ownership and Property in the Person: Democratization and a Tale of Two Concepts. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(1), 20-53. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  37. Reiner, P. B. and Nagel, S. K. (2017): Technologies of the Extended Mind: Defining the Issues. In Illes J & Hossain S (Eds.), Neuroethics: Anticipating the Future (pp. 108-122). Oxford Scholarship Online. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  38. Risko, E. F. and Gilbert, S. J. (2016): Cognitive Offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676-688. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  39. Rousseau, R., Tremblay, S., Banbury, S., Breton, R., and Guitouni, A. (2009): The role of metacognition in the relationship between objective and subjective measures of situation awareness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(1-2), 119-130. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  40. Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., and Berish, D. E. (2003): Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 566-594. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  41. Sunstein, C. R. (2014): Nudging: A Very Short Guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 583-588. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  42. Seneviratne, S., Hu, Y., Nguyen, T., Lan, G., Khalifa, S., Thilakarathna, K., Hassan, M., and Seneviratne, A. (2017): A Survey of Wearable Devices and Challenges. In IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19, 4, 2573-2620. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2017.2731979. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  43. Sisson, P. (2017): Beyond the finish line: how technology helped a blind athlete run free at the New York Marathon. The Verge, Nov 6. URL: <https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/6/16610728/2017-new-york-marathon-blind-runner-wearworks-wayband-simon-wheatcroft> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  44. Thaler, R. H. (2018): Nudge, not sludge. Science, 361(6401), 431. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  45. Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2009): Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  46. Thrasher, J. (2019): Self-ownership as personal sovereignty. Social Philosophy and Policy, 36(2), 116-133. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  47. Vallor, S. (2015): Moral Deskilling and Upskilling in a New Machine Age: Reflections on the Ambiguous Future of Character. Philosophy & Technology, 28, 107-124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  48. Vijayan, V., Connolly, J. P., Condell, J., McKelvey, N., and Gardiner, P. (2021): Review of Wearable Devices and Data Collection Considerations for Connected Health. Sensors, 21(16). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  49. Viseu, A. (2003): Simulation and augmentation: issues of wearable computers. Ethics and Information Technology, 5(1), 17-26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  50. Wickens, C. D., Helton, W. S., Hollands, J. G., and Banbury, S. (2021): Engineering psychology and human performance. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  51. UN General Assembly (20 November 1989): Convention on the Rights of the Child. Treaty Series, vol. 1577, URL: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  52. Wilson, R. S., Beckett, L. A., Barnes, L. L., Schneider, J. A., Bach, J., Evans, D. A., and Bennett, D. A. (2002): Individual difference in rates of change in cognitive abilities in older persons. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 179-193. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377
  53. Xue, Y. (2019): A review on intelligent wearables: Uses and risks. Human Behaviour & Emerging Technology, 1, 287-294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748913344-377

Zitation


Download RIS Download BibTex