Wann eskalieren westliche Mächte institutionelle Kontestation? Interne Kontrolle, externe Effekte und Modi der Kontestation internationaler Institutionen

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen Jahrgang 29 (2022), Heft 1
Vollzugriff

ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen

Jahrgang 29 (2022), Heft 1

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2022
ISSN-Online
2942-1233
ISSN-Print
0946-7165

Kapitelinformationen

Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 29 (2022), Heft 1

Wann eskalieren westliche Mächte institutionelle Kontestation? Interne Kontrolle, externe Effekte und Modi der Kontestation internationaler Institutionen

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
0946-7165
ISSN-Online
2942-1233
Kapitelvorschau:

Internationale Institutionen werden vermehrt durch westliche Mächte attackiert, die gemeinhin dem Kern der „liberalen internationalen Ordnung“ zugerechnet werden. Die Intensität und die Modi ihrer institutionellen Kontestation variieren jedoch stark. Unser Beitrag untersucht, inwiefern institutionelle Faktoren - Merkmale und Effekte der kontestierten Institution - die Wahl unterschiedlicher Modi der institutionellen Kontestation durch westliche Mächte beeinflussen. Wir konzeptualisieren vier Modi der Kontestation internationaler Institutionen: Kritik, Subversion, Rückzug und Sabotage. Wir argumentieren, dass der Modus der Kontestation wesentlich von spezifischen institutionellen Machtkonfigurationen beeinflusst wird. Diese ergeben sich aus dem Grad der internen Kontrolle, die eine Institution unzufriedenen Mächten gewährt, und aus den externen Effekten, die eine Institution auch nach einem Rückzug auf diese ausübt bzw. ausüben würde. Wir überprüfen die Plausibilität unserer Theorie anhand der Kontestation der Weltbank, der Welthandelsorganisation, des Übereinkommens von Paris zum Klimawandel und des Iran-Atomabkommens durch die USA unter der Trump-Administration.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes 2020: International Relations as Politics among People – Hermeneutic Encounters and Global Governance, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  2. Morgenthau, Hans J. 2005 [1948]: Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  3. Lenton, Timothy M. 2012: Arctic Climate Tipping Points, in: Ambio 41: 1, 10-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  4. Latour, Bruno 2003: Is Re-modernisation Occurring, and if so How to Prove it? A Commentary upon Ulrich Beck, in: Theory, Culture and Society 20: 2, 35-48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  5. Lakoff, George/Johnson, Mark 1980: Metaphors We Live by, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  6. Kraska, James 2011: Arctic Security in an Age of Climate Change, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  7. Keohane, Robert O. 1986: Reciprocity in International Relations, in: International Organization 40: 1, 1-27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  8. Kelman, Ilan 2014: No Change from Climate Change: Vulnerability and Small Island Developing States, in: The Geographical Journal 180: 2, 120-129. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  9. Keil, Kathrin 2014: The Arctic: A New Region of Conflict? The Case of Oil and Gas, in: Cooperation and Conflict 49: 2, 162-190. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  10. Hülsse, Rainer/Spencer, Alexander 2008: The Metaphor of Terror: Terrorism Studies and the Constructivist Turn, in: Security Dialogue 39: 6, 571-592. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  11. Held, David 1995: Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  12. Heimann, Martin/Reichstein, Markus 2008: Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Dynamics and Climate Feedbacks, in: Nature 451: 17, 289-292. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  13. Nord, Douglas C. 2016: The Arctic Council – Governance within the Far North, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  14. Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes 2019: The Web of Responsibility in and for the Arctic, in: Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32: 2, 132-158. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  15. Guyomard, Ann-Isabelle 2010: Ethics and bioprospecting in Antarctica, in: Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 10, 31-44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  16. Goosse, H. et al. 2018: Quantifying Climate Feedbacks in Polar Regions, in: Nature Communications 9: 1919, 1-13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  17. Giddens, Anthony 1990: The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  18. Gerhardt, Hannes et al. 2010: Contested Sovereignty in a Changing Arctic, in: Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100: 4, 992-1002. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  19. Finnemore, Martha/Sikkink, Kathryn 1998: International Norm Dynamics and Political Change, in: International Organization 52: 4, 887-917. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  20. Eckersley, Robin 2017: Geopolitan Democracy in the Anthropocene, in: Political Studies 65: 4, 983-999. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  21. Dryzek, John S. 2014: Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a Changing Earth System, in: British Journal of Political Science 46: 4, 937-956. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  22. Dodds, Klaus/Nuttall, Mark 2019: Geo-assembling Narratives of Sustainability in Greenland, in: Gad, Ulrik Pram/Strandsbjerg, Jeppe (Hrsg.): The Politics of Sustainability in the Arctic, London, 224-241. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  23. Dodds, Klaus/Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes 2021: Where to find the Arctic?, Präsentation Workshop: Boundary Work in International Relations, Duisburg, 15. März 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  24. Shea, M.M./Painter, J./Osaka, S. 2020: Representations of Pacific Islands and Climate Change in US, UK, and Australian Newspaper Reporting, in: Climatic Change 161: 1, 89-108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  25. Dodds, Klaus/Depledge, Duncan 2017: Bazaar Governance: Situating the Arctic Circle, in: Keil, Kathrin/Knecht, Sebastian (Hrsg.): Governing Arctic Change, London, 141-160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-155
  26. Zürn, Michael 2018: A Theory of Global Governance – Authority, Legitimacy & Contestation, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  27. Watzlawick, Paul 1983: Anleitung zum Unglücklichsein, München. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  28. Watt-Cloutier, Sheila 2018: The Right to be Cold, Minneapolis. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  29. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979: Theory of International Politics, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  30. Wåhlin, A.K. et al. 2021: Pathways and Modification of Warm Water Flowing Beneath Thwaites Ice Shelf, West Antarctica, in: Science Advances 7: 15, 1-9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  31. VR China 2018: China’s Arctic Policy, in: http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/ 2018/01/26/content_281476026660336.htm; 13.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  32. Steinveg, Beate 2021: The Role of Conferences Within Arctic Governance, in: Polar Geography 44: 1, 37-54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  33. Steffen, Will/Crutzen, Paul/McNeill, John R. 2007: The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?, in: Ambio 36: 8, 614-621. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  34. Slingerland, Edward/Blanchard, Eric M./Boyd-Judson, Lyn 2007: Collision with China: Conceptual Metaphor Analysis, Somatic Marking, and the EP-3 Incident, in: International Studies Quarterly 51: 1, 53-77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  35. Czempiel, Ernst-Otto 1992: Governance and Democratization, in: Rosenau, James N./Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (Hrsg.): Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, 250-271. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  36. Shadian, Jessica M. 2017: Reimagining Political Space: The Limits of Arctic Indigenous Self-Determination in International Governance?, in: Keil, Kathrin/Knecht Sebastian (Hrsg.): Governing Arctic Change – Global Perspectives, London, 43-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  37. Shadian, Jessica M. 2010: From states to polities: Reconceptualizing Sovereignty through Inuit Governance, in: European Journal of International Relations 16: 3, 485-510. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  38. Seidler, Christoph 2009: Arktisches Monopoly – Der Kampf um die Rohstoffe der Polarregion, München. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  39. Scholte, Jan A. 2000: Global Civil Society, in: Woods, Ngaire (Hrsg.): The Political Economy of Globalization, London, 173-201. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  40. Schmitter, Philippe 2019: Defining, Explaining and, then, Exploiting the Elusive Concept of ‘Governance’, in: Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 12: 4, 547-567. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  41. Schloesser, F. et al. 2019: Antarctic iceberg impacts on future Southern Hemisphere Climate, in: Nature Climate Change 9, 672-677. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  42. Rosenau, James N. 1992b: Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics, in: Rosenau, James N./Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (Hrsg.): Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, 1-29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  43. Rosenau, James N. 1992a: Citizenship in a Changing Global Order, in: Rosenau, James N./Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (Hrsg.): Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, 272-294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  44. Pelaudeix, Cécile 2018: Along the Road – China in the Arctic, in: https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Brief%2013%20Arctic.pdf, 14.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  45. Østhagen, Andreas 2019: The New Geopolitics of the Arctic: Russia, China and the EU, in: European View 18: 2, 1-26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  46. PAME 2019: Meaningful Engagement of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Marine Activities, in: https://pame.is/index.php/document-library/pame-reports-new/pame-ministerial-deliverables/2019-11th-arctic-council-ministerial-meeting-rovaniemi-finland/425-meaningful-engagement-of-indigenous-peoples-and-local-communities-in-marine-activities-mema-part-ii-findings-for-policy-makers/file; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  47. Shadian, Jessica M. 2018: Navigating Political Borders Old and New: The Territoriality of Indigenous Inuit Governance, in: Journal of Borderlands Studies 33: 2, 273-288. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  48. Shadian, Jessica M. 2017a: Reimagining Political Space: The Limits of Arctic Indigenous Self-determination in International Governance?, in: Keil, Kathrin/Knecht, Sebastian (Hrsg): Governing Arctic change: Global perspectives, Basingstoke,, 43-57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  49. Shadian, Jessica M. 2010: From states to polities: Reconceptualizing sovereignty through Inuit governance, in: European Journal of International Relations 16: 3, 485-510. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  50. Sellheim, Nicolas 2019: The Arctic Council and the Advancement of Indigenous Rights, in: Sellheim, Nicolas/Zaika, Yulia V./Kelman, Ilan (Hrsg.): Arctic Triumph. Northern Innovation and Persistence, London, 105-125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  51. SDGW 2021: Blue Bioeconomy in the Arctic. in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/2613; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  52. SDGW 2020: The Economy of the North IV. in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/2611;14.4.2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  53. SDWG 2018: ELLAU. Indigenous Youth, Food Knowledge & Arctic Change, in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/2169/Eallu_2018_for%20Web_Abridged.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  54. SDGW 2017: EALLU. Indigenous Youth, Arctic Change & Food Culture, in: http://hdl.handle.net/11374/1926; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  55. Peldaudeix, Cécile und Humrich, Christoph 2021: Global Conventions and Regional Cooperation: The Multifaceted Dynamics of Arctic Governance, in: Finger,Matthias/Rekvig, Gunnar (Hrsg.): Global Arctican introduction to the multifaceted dynamics of the Arctic (im Erscheinen). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  56. Pelaudeix, Cécile. 2019: Transnationalism in the Arctic Ocean: Legitimacy Strategies of the Inuit Circumpolar Council, the European Union and China, in: Lemann Kristiansen Bettinna/Mitkidis Peterkova, Katerina/Munkholm, Louise/Neumann, Lauren/Pelaudeix, Cécile. (Hrsg.): Transnationalisation Tendencies and Law. Legitimacy in Question, London, 33–48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  57. PAME 2009: Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines, in: https://pame.is/document-library/resource-exploration-and-development/arctic-offshore-oil-and-gas-guidelines/202-arctic-offshore-oil-and-gas-guidelines-2009/file; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  58. Shrinkhal, Rashwet 2021: “Indigenous Sovereignty” and Right to Self-determination in International Law: a Critical Appraisal, in: AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 17: 1, 71-82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  59. Martínez-Torres, Maria E./Rosset, Peter M. 2010: La Vía Campesina: The Birth and Evolution of a Transnational Social Movement, in: The Journal of Peasant Studies 37: 1, 149–175. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  60. MacDonald, David 2014: Aboriginal Peoples and Multicultural Reform in Canada. Prospects for a New Binational Society, in: Canadian Journal of Sociology 39: 1, 65-86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  61. Maaka, Rogers/Fleeras, Augie 2005: The Politics of Indigeneity. Challenging the State in Canada and Aotearoa New Zealand, Dunedin Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  62. Lightfoot, Sheryl R. 2016: Global indigenous politics. A subtle revolution, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  63. Lightfoot, Sheryl R. 2010: Emerging international indigenous rights norms and ‘over-compliance’ in New Zealand and Canada, in: Political Science 62: 1, 84-104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  64. Koivurova, Timo 2011: The Status and Role of Indigenous Peoples in Arctic International Governance, in: Alfredsson, Gudmundur/Koivurova, Timo (Hrsg.): The Yearbook of Polar Law, Band 3, 169-192. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  65. Koivurova, Timo/Heinämäki, Leena 2006: The participation of indigenous peoples in international norm-making in the Arctic, in: Polar Record 42: 2, 101-109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  66. Kobelev, Alexander 2006: Statement by Alexander Kobelev (5th Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council, Salekhard 26 October 2006), in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/1564/ACMM05_Salekhard_2006_Final_Statement_by_Alexander_Kobelev.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  67. Keil, Kathrin/Knecht, Sebastian (Hrsg.) 2017: Governing Arctic Change. Global Perspectives, Basingstoke. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  68. ILO 196 1989: Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, in: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.16_Indigenous%20and%20Tribal%20Peoples%20Convention.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  69. Beck, Ulrich 1992: Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  70. Crutzen, Paul/Stoermer, Eugene F. 2000: The Anthropocene, in: Global Change Newsletter 41, 17-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  71. Chandler, David/ Müller, Franziska/ Rothe, Detlev (Hrsg.) 2021: International Relations in the Anthropocene: New Agendas, New Agencies and New Approaches, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  72. Caesar, L. et al. 2021: Current Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation weakest in last millennium, in: Nature Geoscience 14, 118-120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  73. Byers, Michael 2013: International Law and the Arctic, New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  74. Bull, Hedley 1977: The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Basingstoke. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  75. Bruun, Johanne M. 2020: Invading the Whiteness: Science, (Sub)Terrain, and US Militarisation of the Greenland Ice Sheet, in: Geopolitics 25: 1, 167-188. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  76. Bronselaer, B. et al. 2018: Change in Future Climate due to Antarctic Meltwater, in: Nature 564, 53-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  77. Bravo, Michael 2009: Voices From the Sea Ice: The Reception of Climate Impact Narratives, in: Journal of Historical Geography 35: 2, 256–278. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  78. Box, Jason E. et al. 2019: Key Indicators of Arctic Climate Change: 1971–2017, in: Environmental Research Letters 14: 4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  79. Borgerson, Scott G. 2008: Arctic Meltdown: The Economic and Security Implications of Global Warming, in: Foreign Affairs 87: 2, 63-77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  80. ICC 2020: Inuit Circumpolar Council Alaska. 2020. Food Sovereignty and Self-Governance: Inuit Role in Managing Arctic Marine Resources, in: https://www.inuitcircumpolar.com/project/food-sovereignty-and-self-governance-inuit-role-in-managing-arctic-marine-resources/; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  81. Barnes, D.K.A. et al. 2018: Icebergs, Sea Ice, Blue Carbon and Antarctic Climate Feedbacks, in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 376: 2122. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  82. Bäckstrand, Karin 2006: Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development, in: European Journal of International Relations 12: 4, 467-498. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  83. Arctic Council 2021: Reykjavík Declaration, Reykjavík, 20 May 2021, in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/2600/2021%20Reykjavik% 20Declaration%2020-5-2021.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, 14.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  84. Anderson, Benedict 1983: Imagined Communities, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  85. Albert, Mathias/Knecht, Sebastian 2022: A Responsibility to Freeze? The Arctic as a Complex Object of Responsibility, in: Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes/Vetterlein, Antje (Hrsg.): The Routledge Handbook on Responsibility in International Relations, London, 369-379. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-141
  86. Zellen, Barry S. 2020: Global Co-Management and the Emergent Arctic: Opportunities for Engagement and Collaboration between Arctic States, Indigenous Permanent Participants, and Observers on the Arctic Council, in: Alfredsson, Gudmundur/Jabour, Julia/Koivurova, Timo/Shibata, Akiho (Hrsg.): The Yearbook of Polar Law, Band 12, 251–267. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  87. Young, Oran 1998: Creating Regimes. Arctic Accords and International Governance, Ithaca/NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  88. WFFS 2001: Final Declaration of the World Forum on Food Sovereignty, in: https://base.socioeco.org/docs/doc-792_en.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  89. UNDRIP 2007: United Nation Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, in: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  90. Spohr, Kristina/Hamilton, Daniel S. 2021: From Last Frontier to First Frontier: The Arctic and World Order, in: Spohr, Kristina/Hamilton, Daniel S. (Hrsg.): The Arctic and World Order, Washington, DC, 1-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  91. Alter, Karen J./Meunier, Sophie 2009: The Politics of International Regime Complexity, in: Perspectives on Politics 7: 1, 13-24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  92. ANSA 2019: Botta e risposta Salvini-Renzi, in: https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/politica/2019/08/18/conte-salvini-di-maio-governo-pd_8cb04448-fa6c-45fc-a967-ea78fd92e2e8.html; 2.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  93. Barnett, Michael/Duvall, Raymond 2005: Power in International Politics, in: International Organization 59: 1, 39-75. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  94. Baschuk, Bryce 2019: WTO Members Agree on a 2020 Budget, Averting Jan. 1 Shutdown, in: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-05/wto-members-agree-on-a-2020-budget-averting-jan-1-shutdown; 06.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  95. Bauer, Michael W./Ege, Jörn 2016: Bureaucratic Autonomy of International Organizations’ Secretariats, in: Journal of European Public Policy 23: 7, 1019-1037. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  96. Belal, Kulsoom 2019: Uncertainty over the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Iran, the European Union and the United States, in: Policy Perspectives 16: 1, 23-29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  97. Blake, Daniel J./Payton, Autumn L. 2015: Balancing Design Objectives. Analyzing New Data on Voting Rules in Intergovernmental Organizations, in: The Review of International Organizations 10: 3, 377-402. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  98. Blatter, Joachim/Blume, Till 2008: In Search of Co-variance, Causal Mechanisms or Congruence? Towards a Plural Understanding of Case Studies, in: Swiss Political Science Review 14: 2, 315-356. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  99. Börzel, Tanja A./Zürn, Michael 2021: Contestations of the Liberal International Order. From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism, in: International Organization 75: 2, 282-305. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  100. Brewster, Rachel 2018: The Trump Administration and the Future of the WTO, in: Yale Journal of International Law 44: 1, 1-10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  101. Brooks, Stephen G./Wohlforth, William C. 2016: The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century. China's Rise and the Fate of America's Global Position, in: International Security 40: 3, 7-53. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  102. Busch, Per-Olof 2009: The Climate Secretariat. Making a Living in a Straitjacket, in: Biermann, Frank/Siebenhüner, Bernd (Hrsg.): Managers of Global Change, Cambridge, 245-264. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  103. Choi, Seung-Whan 2021: Nationalism and Withdrawals from Intergovernmental Organizations. Connecting Theory and Data, in: The Review of International Organizations (online first), DOI:10.1007/s11558-021-09417-1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  104. Chwieroth, Jeffrey M. 2014: Controlling Capital. The International Monetary Fund and Transformative Incremental Change from Within International Organisations, in: New Political Economy 19: 3, 445-469. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  105. Cooley, Alexander/Nexon, Daniel H. 2020: Exit from Hegemony. The Unraveling of the American Global Order, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  106. Copelovitch, Mark/Hobolt, Sara B./Walter, Stefanie 2019: Challenges to the Contemporary Global Order. Cause for Pessimism or Optimism? in: Journal of European Public Policy 27: 7, 1114-1125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  107. Cox, Robert/Jacobson, Harold 1974: The Anatomy of Influence. Decision Making in International Organizations, New Haven, CT. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  108. Csehi, Robert/Conceição Heldt, Eugenia 2021: Populism as a ‘Corrective’ to Trade Agreements? ‘America First’ and the Readjustment of NAFTA, in: International Politics (online first), DOI:10.1057/s41311-021-00306-3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  109. Daddow, Oliver 2013: Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and the Eurosceptic Tradition in Britain, in: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15: 2, 210-227. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  110. Daßler, Benjamin 2022: Good(s) for Everyone? Policy Area Competition and Institutional Topologies in the Regime Complexes of Tax Avoidance and Intellectual Property, in: Journal of International Relations and Development, forthcoming. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  111. Daßler, Benjamin/Heinkelmann-Wild, Tim 2021: International Authority, Democracies, and Exit from International Organizations (Konferenzpapier). Political Economy of International Organization (PEIO) Online-Seminar, 9.2. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  112. Daßler, Benjamin/Zangl, Bernhard/Kruck, Andreas 2019: Interactions between Hard and Soft Power. The Institutional Adaptation of International Intellectual Property Protection to Global Power Shifts, in: European Journal of International Relations 25: 2, 588-612. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  113. Davenport, Coral 2017: Top Trump Advisers Are Split on Paris Agreement on Climate Change, in: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us/politics/climate-change-trump.html; 06.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  114. Deitelhoff, Nicole 2020: What’s in a Name? Contestation and Backlash against International Norms and Institutions, in: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22: 4, 715-727. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  115. Deitelhoff, Nicole/Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2019: Norms under Challenge. Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness, in: Journal of Global Security Studies 4: 1, 2-17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  116. Deitelhoff, Nicole/Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2020: Things We Lost in the Fire. How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms, in: International Studies Review 22: 1, 51-76. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  117. Deutsche Welle 2019: Macron bescheinigt der NATO den "Hirntod", in: https://www.dw.com/de/macron-bescheinigt-der-nato-den-hirntod/a-51154416; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  118. Dijkstra, Hylke 2017: Collusion in International Organizations. How States Benefit from the Authority of Secretariats, in: Global Governance. A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 23: 4, 601-619. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  119. Duncombe, Constance/Dunne, Tim 2018: After Liberal World Order, in: International Affairs 94: 1, 25-42. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  120. Early, Bryan 2018: E.U. Countries Want to Save the Iran Nuclear Deal. Don’t Expect Cooperation on U.S. Sanctions., in: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/05/25/e-u-countries-want-to-save-the-iran-nuclear-deal-dont-expect-cooperation-on-u-s-sanctions/; 06.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  121. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette/Hofmann, Stephanie C. 2020: Of the Contemporary Global Order, Crisis, and Change, in: Journal of European Public Policy 27: 7, 1077-1089. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  122. Elliott, Larry/Brummer, Alex 1995: Rich Man's Club Plans Bretton Woods Reform, in: The Guardian, 14.6.1995, 12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  123. Faude, Benjamin/Fuss, Julia 2020: Coordination or Conflict? The Causes and Consequences of Institutional Overlap in a Disaggregated World Order, in: Global Constitutionalism 9: 2, 268-289. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  124. Fioretos, Orfeo 2011: Historical Institutionalism in International Relations, in: International Organisation 65: 2, 367-399. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  125. Foteini, Asderaki/Markozani, Eleftheria 2020: European Migration Policy. Frontex, Differentiation and Brexit, in: Gänzle, Stefan/Leruth, Benjamin/Trondal, Jarle (Hrsg.): Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in a Post-Brexit Era, London, 91-109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  126. Gavras, Konstantin/Thomas, J./Scotto, Jason R./Hofmann, Stephanie/Thomson, Catarina/Mader, Matthias/Schoen, Harald 2020: NATO and CSDP. Party and Public Positioning in Germany and France (NATO Defense College Policy Brief), in: https://www.ndc.nato.int/news/news.php?icode=1444; 2.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  127. Geddes, Andrew 2005: Getting the Best of Both Worlds? Britain, the EU and Migration Policy, in: International Affairs 81: 4, 723-740. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  128. George, Alexander L./Bennett, Andrew 2005: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  129. Gerring, John 2007: Case Study Research. Principles and Practices, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  130. Gilpin, Robert 1981: War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  131. Gruber, Lloyd 2000: Ruling the World. Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  132. Haass, Richard N. 2018: Liberal World Order, R.I.P., in: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/end-of-liberal-world-order-by-richard-n%2D%2Dhaass-2018-03?barrier=accesspaylog; 02.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  133. Hack, Regina 2017: Deliberation als Reaktion auf Protest? Das zivilgesellschaftliche Dialogforum der WTO, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 24: 1, 37-67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  134. Hanrieder, Tine 2014: Gradual Change in International Organisations. Agency Theory and Historical Institutionalism, in: Politics 34: 4, 324-333. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  135. Havercroft, Jonathan/Wiener, Antje/Kumm, Mattias/Dunoff, Jeffrey L. 2018: Editorial. Donald Trump as Global Constitutional Breaching Experiment, in: Global Constitutionalism 7: 1, 1-13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  136. Hawkins, Kirk A./Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal 2017: The Ideational Approach to Populism, in: Latin American Research Review 52: 4, 513-528. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  137. Heinkelmann-Wild, Tim/Jankauskas, Vytautas 2020: To Yield or Shield? Comparing International Public Administrations’ Responses to Member States’ Policy Contestation, in: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis (online first), DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2020.1822144. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  138. Heinkelmann-Wild, Tim/Kruck, Andreas/Daßler, Benjamin 2021: A Crisis from Within. The Trump Administration and the Contestation of the Liberal International Order, in: Böller, Florian/Werner, Welf (Hrsg.): A Hegemonic Transition? Reconfigurations of Global Economic and Security Orders in the Age of Trump, Basingstoke, 69-86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  139. Heinkelmann-Wild, Tim/Zangl, Bernhard 2020: Multilevel Blame Games. Blame‐shifting in the European Union, in: Governance 33: 4, 953-969. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  140. Helfer, Laurence R. 2005: Exiting Treaties, in: Virginia Law Review 91, 1579-1648. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  141. Helfer, Laurence R. 2009: Regime Shifting in the International Intellectual Property System, in: Perspectives on Politics 7: 1, 39-44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  142. Hirschmann, Gisela 2020: To be or not to be? Lebensdynamiken internationaler Organisationen im Spannungsfeld von internationaler Autorität und nationalstaatlicher Souveränität, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 27: 1, 69-93. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  143. Hix, Simon 2016: Does the UK Have Influence in the EU Legislative Process?, in: The Political Quarterly 87: 2, 200-208. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  144. Hobolt, Sara B. 2016: The Brexit Vote. A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent, in: Journal of European Public Policy 23: 9, 1259-1277. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  145. Hooghe, Liesbet/Lenz, Tobias/Marks, Gary 2019: Contested World Order. The Delegitimation of International Governance, in: The Review of International Organizations 14: 4, 731-743. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  146. Hopewell, Kristen 2015: Different Paths to Power. The Rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization, in: Review of International Political Economy 22: 2, 311-338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  147. Ikenberry, G. J. 2018: The End of Liberal International Order?, in: International Affairs 94: 1, 7-23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  148. Jupille, Joseph/Mattli, Walter/Snidal, Duncan 2013: Institutional Choice and Global Commerce, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  149. Kaul, Inge/Grunberg, Isabelle/Stern, Marc A. 1999: Defining Global Public Goods, in: Kaul, Inge/Grunberg, Isabelle/Stern, Marc (Hrsg.): Global Public Goods, Cambridge, MA, 2-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  150. Keohane, Robert O. 1984: After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  151. Kölliker, Alkuin 2001: Bringing Together or Driving Apart the Union? Towards a Theory of Differentiated Integration, in: West European Politics 24: 4, 125-151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  152. Kolmaš, Michal 2021: International Pressure and Japanese Withdrawal from the International Whaling Commission. When Shaming Fails, in: Australian Journal of International Affairs 75: 2, 197-216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  153. Koremenos, Barbara 2016: The Continent of International Law. Explaining Agreement Design, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  154. Koremenos, Barbara/Lipson, Charles/Snidal, Duncan 2001: The Rational Design of International Institutions, in: International Organization 55: 4, 761-799. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  155. Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian/Rittberger, Berthold 2020: The LIOn's Share. How the Liberal International Order Contributes to its Own Legitimacy Crisis. Harvard CES Open Forum Series 2019-2020, Boston, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  156. Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian/Zangl, Bernhard 2016: Varieties of Contested Multilateralism. Positive and Negative Consequences for the Constitutionalisation of Multilateral Institutions, in: Global Constitutionalism 5: 3, 327-343. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  157. Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian/Zangl, Bernhard 2020: Zwischen Hoffen und Bangen. Zum Verhältnis von Autorität, Politisierung und Demokratisierung in internationalen Organisationen, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 27: 1, 5-36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  158. Kruck, Andreas/Heinkelmann-Wild, Tim/Daßler, Benjamin/Hobbach, Raphaela 2021: Contestation of International Institutions by Established Western Powers. Varying Contestation Frames and Their Implications for Institutional Legitimacy. unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. München. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  159. Kwai, Isabella 2020: Your Wednesday Briefing, in: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/14/briefing/coronavirus-britain-world-health-organization.html; 17.5.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  160. Lake, David A./Martin, Lisa L./Risse, Thomas 2021: Challenges to the Liberal Order. Reflections on International Organization, in: International Organization 75: 2, 225-257. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  161. Lanktree, Graham 2020: 5 Things to Know about the UK-Japan Trade Deal, in: https://www.politico.eu/article/five-things-from-the-uks-trade-deal-with-japan/; 17.5.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  162. Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2019: “Winning” and “Losing” the Iran Nuclear Deal. How Advocacy Coalitions and Competition Shape U.S. Foreign Policy, in: Politics & Policy 47: 3, 464-505. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  163. Lantis, Jeffrey S./Wunderlich, Carmen 2018: Resiliency Dynamics of Norm Clusters. Norm Contestation and International Cooperation, in: Review of International Studies 44: 3, 570-593. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  164. Lawder, David 2018: World Bank Shareholders Back $13 Billion Capital Increase, in: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-imf-g20-wbank-idUSKBN1HS0QS; 06.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  165. Layne, Christopher 2018: The US–Chinese Power Shift and the End of the Pax Americana, in: International Affairs 94: 1, 89-111. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  166. Lenz, Tobias/Bezuijen, Jeanine/Hooghe, Liesbet/Marks, Gary 2015: Patterns of International Organization. Task Specific vs. General Purpose, in: Conceição-Heldt, Eugénia d./Koch, Martin/Liese, Andrea (Hrsg.): Internationale Organisationen, Wiesbaden, 136-161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  167. Lewis, Paul 1989: U.N. Health Agency Seeks Compromise on P.L.O., in: New York Times, 07.5.1989, A5. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  168. Lipscy, Phillip Y. 2017: Renegotiating the World Order, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  169. Mahoney, James/Thelen, Kathleen 2010: A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change, in: Mahoney, James/Thelen, Kathleen (Hrsg.): Explaining Institutional Change, Cambridge, MA, 1-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  170. Mathiesen, Karl/Jing, Li 2017: China Flexes its Muscle as Climate Talks End with Slow Progress, in: https://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/11/17/china-flexes-muscle-climate-talks-make-slow-progress/, 06.04.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  171. Mattila, Mikko 2008: Voting and Coalitions in the Council after the Enlargement, in: Naurin, Daniel (Hrsg.): Unveiling the Council of the European Union, Basingstoke, 23-35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  172. Mattli, Walter 1999: The Logic of Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  173. Mayeda, Andrew 2017: Mnuchin Calls for World Bank to Wean Itself Off Public Funds, in: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-13/mnuchin-calls-for-world-bank-to-wean-itself-off-government-cash; 07.6.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  174. Mearsheimer, John J. 2019: Bound to Fail. The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order, in: International Security 43: 4, 7-50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  175. Miles, Tom 2018: WTO Chief Reacts Coolly to Trump's Criticism of Trade Judges, in: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-trade-wto/wto-chief-reacts-coolly-to-trumps-criticism-of-trade-judges-idUKKCN1GB2IQ; 06.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  176. Mnuchin, Steven 2017: Statement on the Ninety-Fifth Meeting of the Development Committee of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund in Washington, April 22, in: https://www.devcommittee.org/sites/dc/files/download/Statements/DCS2017-0022-UnitedStates.pdf; 2.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  177. Mohsin, S./Harney, J. 2019: Trump Scolds World Bank Over Low-Interest Loans to China, in: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-07/trump-scolds-world-bank-over-low-interest-loans-to-china; 23.3.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  178. Morales, Alex/Brush, Silva 2021: U.K. Plans Sweeping Markets Review to Give London a Brexit Edge, in: Bloomberg Politics, 11.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  179. Morse, Julia C./Keohane, Robert O. 2014: Contested Multilateralism, in: The Review of International Organizations 9: 4, 385-412. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  180. Mosley, Paul 1985: The Political Economy of Foreign Aid. A Model of the Market for a Public Good, in: Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 2, 373-393. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  181. Musgrave, Paul 2019: International Hegemony Meets Domestic Politics. Why Liberals can be Pessimists, in: Security Studies 28: 3, 451-478. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  182. Narlikar, Amrita 2019: Trade Multilateralism in Crisis. Limitations of Current Debates on Reforming the WTO, and Why a Game-Changer is Necessary, in: Soobramanien, Teddy Y./Vickers, Brendan/Enos-Edu, Hilary (Hrsg.): WTO Reform. Reshaping Global Trade Governance for 21st Century Challenges, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  183. Olson, Mancur/Zeckhauser, Richard 1966: An Economic Theory of Alliances, in: The Review of Economics and Statistics 48: 3, 266-279. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  184. Orentilicher, Diane F. 2003: Unilateral Multilateralism. United States Policy toward the International Criminal Court, in: Cornell International Law Journal 36: 3, 415-433. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  185. Panke, Diana/Petersohn, Ulrich 2012: Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes, in: European Journal of International Relations 18: 4, 719-742. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  186. Panke, Diana/Petersohn, Ulrich 2016: Norm Challenges and Norm Death. The Inexplicable?, in: Cooperation and Conflict 51: 1, 3-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  187. Panke, Diana/Petersohn, Ulrich 2017: President Donald J. Trump. An Agent of Norm Death? in: International Journal 72: 4, 572-579. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  188. Patrick, Steward 2017: Trump, the World Bank and the IMF. Explaining The Dog That Didn’t Bark (yet), in: https://www.cfr.org/blog/trump-world-bank-and-imf-explaining-dog-didnt-bark-yet; 06.04.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  189. Paul, T. V. 2016: The Accommodation of Rising Powers in World Politics, in: Paul, T. V. (Hrsg.): Accommodating Rising Powers. Past, Present, and Future, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  190. Pavone, Ilja R. 2018: The Paris Agreement and the Trump Administration. Road to Nowhere?, in: Journal of International Studies 11: 1, 34-49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  191. Peez, Anton/Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2021: Contestation and Norm Change in Whale and Elephant Conservation. Non-use or Sustainable Use? in: Cooperation and Conflict (online first), DOI: 001083672110471. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  192. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 2019: How Should WTO Members React to Their WTO Crises?, in: World Trade Review 18: 3, 503-525. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  193. Przeworski, Adam/Teune, Henry 1982: The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, Malabar, FL. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  194. Rus, Veljko 1980: Positive and Negative Power. Thoughts on the Dialectics of Power, in: Organization Studies 1: 1, 3-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  195. Schulz, Heiner/König, Thomas 2000: Institutional Reform and Decision-Making Efficiency in the European Union, in: American Journal of Political Science 44: 4, 653-666. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  196. Selby, Jan 2019: The Trump Presidency, Climate Change, and the Prospect of a Disorderly Energy Transition, in: Review of International Studies 45: 3, 471-490. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  197. Steinberg, Richard H. 2002: In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO, in: International Organization 56: 2, 339-374. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  198. Stephen, Matthew D./Zürn, Michael 2019: Contested World Orders. Rising Powers, Non-governmental Organizations, and the Politics of Authority beyond the Nation-state, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  199. Stokes, Doug 2018: Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order, in: International Affairs 94: 1, 133-150. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  200. Stone, Randall W. 2011: Controlling Institutions, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  201. The White House 2018: Remarks by President Trump on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, in: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-joint-comprehensive-plan-action/; 30.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  202. Toner, Robin 1986: U.S. Witholds U.N. Population Funds, in: New York Times, 28.8.1986, 3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  203. Trump, Donald 2017: Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord, in: https://it.usembassy.gov/statement-president-trump-paris-climate-accord/; 07.07.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  204. Trump, Donald 2018: Official Twitter account. Tweet vom 6.4.2018, in: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/982264844136017921; 8.7.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  205. Trump, Donald 2019: Official Twitter account. Tweet vom 6.12.2019, in: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1203109065070665728; 8.7.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  206. Tsebelis, George 2002: Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  207. United Nations 2017: Depositary Notification. United Nations. August 8, 2017, in: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2017/CN.464.2017-Eng.pdf; 6.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  208. Urpelainen, Johannes 2012: Unilateral Influence on International Bureaucrats, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 56: 4, 704-735. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  209. Urpelainen, Johannes/van de Graaf, Thijs 2015: Your Place or Mine? Institutional Capture and the Creation of Overlapping International Institutions, in: British Journal of Political Science 45: 4, 799-827. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  210. van de Graaf, Thijs 2013: Fragmentation in Global Energy Governance. Explaining the Creation of IRENA, in: Global Environmental Politics 13: 3, 14-33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  211. Verma, Pranshu 2020: Trump’s Sanctions on International Court May Do Little Beyond Alienating Allies, in: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/world/europe/trump-sanctions-international-criminal-court.html; 2.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  212. Vestergaard, Jakob/Wade, Robert H. 2015: Still in the Woods. Gridlock in the IMF and the World Bank Puts Multilateralism at Risk, in: Global Policy 6: 1, 1-12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  213. Von Borzyskowski, Inken/Vabulas, Felicity 2019: Hello, Goodbye. When do States Withdraw from International Organizations? in: The Review of International Organizations 14: 2, 335-366. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  214. White House 2018: President Donald J. Trump Is Cutting Off Funds the Iranian Regime Uses to Support Its Destructive Activities Around the World. May 8, 2018, in: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-cutting-off-funds-iranian-regime-uses-support-destructive-activities-around-world/; 6.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  215. Widerberg, Oscar/van Laerhoven, Frank 2014: Measuring the Autonomous Influence of an International Bureaucracy. The Division for Sustainable Development, in: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 14: 4, 303-327. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  216. Wiener, Antje 2018: Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  217. Wolf, Albert B. 2018: After JCPOA. American Grand Strategy toward Iran, in: Comparative Strategy 37: 1, 22-34. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  218. World Bank 2019: Statement from World Bank Group President David Malpass on 2019 World Bank-IMF Spring Meetings, in: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2019/04/13/statement-from-world-bank-group-president-david-malpass-on-2019-world-bank---international-monetary-fund-spring-meetings; 7.6.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  219. World Trade Organization 2020: What We Stand for, in: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/what_stand_for_e.htm; 20.3.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  220. Zangl, Bernhard 2008: Judicialization Matters! A Comparison of Dispute Settlement Under GATT and the WTO, in: International Studies Quarterly 52: 4, 825-854. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  221. Zangl, Bernhard/Heußner, Frederick/Kruck, Andreas/Lanzendörfer, Xenia 2016: Imperfect Adaptation. How the WTO and the IMF Adjust to Shifting Power Distributions among their Members, in: The Review of International Organizations 11: 2, 171-196. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  222. Zhang, Yong-Xiang/Chao, Qing-Chen/Zheng, Qiu-Hong/Huang, Lei 2017: The Withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and its Impact on Global Climate Change Governance, in: Advances in Climate Change Research 8: 4, 213-219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  223. Zürn, Michael 2018: A Theory of Global Governance. Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-6
  224. Aalberts, Tanja E./Van Munster, Rens 2008: From Wendt to Kuhn: Reviving the ‘Third Debate’ in International Relations, in: International Politics, 45: 720-746. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  225. Aalberts, Tanja/Kurowska, Xymena/Leander Anna/Mälksoo, Maria/Heath-Kelly, Charlotte/Lobato, Luisa/Svensson, Ted 2020: Rituals of World Politics: On (Visual) Practices Disordering Things, in: Critical Studies on Security (online first), DOI: 10.1080/21624887.2020.1792. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  226. Adler, Emanuel/Barnett, Michael (Hrsg.) 1998: Security Communities, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  227. Adler, Emanuel/Greve, Patricia 2009: When Security Community Meets Balance of Power. Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance, in: Review of International Studies, 35(1): 59-84. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  228. Adler, Emanuel/Pouliot, Vincent (Hrsg.) 2011: International Practices, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  229. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (Hrsg.) 2013: Bourdieu in International Relations, Abingdon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  230. Acheson, Dean 1969: Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  231. Albert, Mathias/Buzan, Barry/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.) 2013: Bringing Sociology to International Politics: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  232. Aron, Raymond 2018: Émile Durkheim, in: Raymond Aron (Hrsg.): Main Currents in Sociological Thought, Band 2, New York, NY, 9-91. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  233. Asmus, Ronald D./Vondra Alexandr 2005: The Origins of Atlanticism in Central and Eastern Europe, in: Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18(2): 203-216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  234. Bain, William 2020: Political Theology of International Order, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  235. Barkdull, John 1995: Waltz, Durkheim, and International Relations: The International System as an Abnormal Form, in: American Political Science Review, 89(3), 669-680. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  236. Barkin, Samuel J. 2003: Realist-Constructivism, in: International Studies Review 5: 325-342. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  237. Bell, Catherine 1997: Ritual. Perspectives and Dimensions, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  238. Bellah, Robert N. 1968: Civil Religion in America, in: William McLoughlin and Robert N. Bellah (Hrsg.), Religion in America, Boston, MA, 3-23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  239. Benford, Robert D./Kurtz Lester R. 1987: Performing the Nuclear Ceremony: The Arms Race as a Ritual, in: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4): 463-482. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  240. Bevin, Ernest 1949: Remarks by the British Minister of Foreign Affairs During the Signing Ceremony of the North Atlantic Treaty, US Department of State Bulletin, 20(511): 480-482. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  241. Bially Mattern, Janice 2005: Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis and Representational Force, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  242. Bliesemann de Guevara, Berit (Hrsg.) 2016: Myth and Narrative in International Politics, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  243. Blumler J.G./Brown J.R./Ewbank A.J./Nossiter T.J. 1971: Attitudes to the Monarchy: Their Structure and Development During a Ceremonial Occasion, in: Political Studies, 19: 149-171. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  244. Bottici, Chiara 2007: A Philosophy of Political Myth, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  245. British Ministry of Defence 2012: Collective Defence in the 21st Century. Speech by Philip Hammond, Secretary of State for Defence. 5. Januar, in: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/2012-01-05-nato-the-case-for-collective-defence-in-the-21st-century--2; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  246. Browning, Christopher S./ Joenniemi, Pertti 2013: From Fratricide to Security Community: Re-theorising Difference in the Constitution of Nordic Peace, in: Journal of International Relations and Development, 16: 4, 483-513. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  247. Carlson, John D./Owens Eric C. (Hrsg.) 2003: The Sacred and the Sovereign: Religion and International Politics, Washington, DC. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  248. Charlesworth, Hilary 2010: Swimming to Cambodia: Justice and Ritual in Human Rights After Conflict, in: Australian Yearbook of International Law, 29, 1-16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  249. Chase, Oscar G. 2005: Law, Culture, and Ritual: Disputing Systems in Cross-Cultural Context, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  250. Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2008: Constructivism and Foreign Policy, in: Smith, Steve/Hadfield, Amelia/Dunne, Tim (Hrsg.): Foreign Policy. Theories, Actors, Cases, Oxford, 71-82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  251. Chirac, Jacques 2004: Speech by the President of the French Republic at the International Ceremony of the D-Day Landings. 06. Juni, https://www.daysofwonder.com/ memoir44/en/advanced-play/arromanches-speech; 18.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  252. CNN 2004: Bush: America Would Do It Again, 7. Juni, in: https://edition.cnn.com/2004/ WORLD/europe/06/06/dday.main/index.html; 18.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  253. Daalder, Ivo 2003: The End of Atlanticism, in: Survival, 45: 2, 147-166. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  254. Daase, Christopher 2003: Der Anfang vom Ende des nuklearen Tabus. Zur Legitimitätskrise der nuklearen Weltordnung, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 10: 1, 7-41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  255. Davies, Mathew 2018: Ritual and Region: The Invention of ASEAN, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  256. Deutsch, Karl W./Burrell, Sidney A./Kann, Robert A./Lee, Maurice Jr./Lichterman, Martin/Lindgren, Raymond E./Loewenheim, Francis L./Van Wagenen, Richard W. 1957: Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  257. Deutsch, Karl W. 1967: Tides Among Nations, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  258. Deutscher Bundestag 2014: Opening Statement by General James L. Jones. Third Session of the Commission on Out-of-Area Operations. Drucksache 18(26)018), 26. Juni, in: http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/CD05000/Anlage14.pdf; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  259. Deutschlandfunk 2017: „Bild“-Interview. Trump nennt Nato „obsolet“, 16. Januar, in: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/bild-interview-trump-nennt-nato-obsolet.1947. de.html?drn:news_id=699839; 7.10.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  260. Douglas, Mary 1973: Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  261. Durkheim, Émile 1953: Sociology and Philosophy. Translation by D.F. Pocock with Introduction by J.G. Peristiany, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  262. Durkheim, Émile 2002/1925: Moral Education. Translated by Everett K. Wilson and Herman Schnurer, Mineola. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  263. Durkheim, Émile 2008/1912: The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Carol Cosman, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  264. Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew 2012: Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organisation, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  265. Edelman, Murray J. 1964: The Symbolic Uses of Politics, Urbana, IL. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  266. Faizullaev, Alisher 2013: Diplomacy and Symbolism, in: The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 8: 2, 91-114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  267. Fierke, Karin M. 2007: Critical Approaches to International Security, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  268. Fox, Jonathan 2001: Religion as an Overlooked Element of International Relations, in: International Studies Review, 3: 3, 53-73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  269. Geertz, Clifford 1973: The Interpretation of Culture, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  270. Giesen, Bernhard 2006: Performing the Sacred: A Durkheimian Perspective on the Performative Turn in the Social Sciences, in: Alexander, Jeffrey C./Giesen, Bernhard/Mast, Jason L. (Hrsg.): Social Performance, Cambridge, 325-367. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  271. Gill, Graeme 2012: Symbolism and Regime Change in Russia, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  272. Giddens, Anthony 1971: Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  273. Goodin, Robert E. 1978: Rites of Rulers, in: British Journal of Sociology, 29: 3, 281-299. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  274. Gordon, Scott 1991: The History and Philosophy of Social Science, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  275. Gusterson, Hugh 1996: Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War, Berkeley, CA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  276. Hall, Todd H. 2015: Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage, Ithaca: NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  277. Haynes, Jeffrey 2008: Religion and Foreign Policy Making in the USA, India, and Iran: Towards a Research Agenda, in: Third World Quarterly, 26: 1, 39-54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  278. Haynes, Jeffrey/Hurd, Elizabeth/Hunter, Shireen/Sweetman, Brendan, J. Paul Martin/Modood, Tariq/Kosmin, Barry A. 2011: The Sacred and the Sovereign. A Compendium of Pieces from e-IR on Religion and International Relations, in: http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/sacred-sovereign.pdf; 15.12.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  279. Hedetoft, Ulf (Hrsg.) 1998: Political Symbols, Symbolic Politics: European Identities in Transformation, Aldershot. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  280. Holmes, Marcus 2013: The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions, in: International Organization, 67: 4, 829-861. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  281. Holmes, Marcus/Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2019: Social Bonding in Diplomacy, in: International Theory, 12: 1, 133-161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  282. Hopf, Ted 2010: The Logic of Habit in International Relations, in: European Journal of International Relations, 16: 4, 539-561. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  283. Hopgood, Stephen 2009: Moral Authority, Modernity and the Politics of the Sacred, in: European Journal of International Relations, 15: 2, 229-255. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  284. Hubert, Henri/Mauss, Marcel 1964/1898: Sacrifice: Its Nature and Functions. Translated by W.D. Halls, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  285. Hurd, Ian 2002: Legitimacy, Power, and the Symbolic Life of the UN Security Council, in: Global Governance, 8: 1, 35-51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  286. Interview 1, 15. Dezember 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  287. Interview 2, 12. Februar 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  288. Interview 3, 22. September 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  289. Interview 4, 16. März 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  290. Interview 5, 16. Juni 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  291. Interview 6, 11. Januar 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  292. Interview 7, 19. November 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  293. Interview 8, 17. November 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  294. Interview 9, 17. März 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  295. Interview 10, 3. März 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  296. Kabalkova, Vendulka 2000: Towards an International Political Theology, in: Millennium, 29: 3, 682-683. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  297. Katzenstein, Peter J. (Hrsg.) 1996: The Culture of National Security, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  298. Katzenstein, Peter J. 2014: Karl Deutsch: Teacher and Scholar, in: International Relations, 28: 3, 296-303. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  299. Kertzer, David I. 1988: Ritual, Politics and Power, New Haven, CT. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  300. Keys, Barbara/Yorke Claire 2019: Personal and Political Emotions in the Mind of the Diplomat, in: Political Psychology, 40: 6, 1235-1249. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  301. Koschut, Simon 2014: Emotional (Security) Communities: The Significance of Emotion Norms in Inter-allied Conflict Management, in: Review of International Studies, 40: 3, 533-558. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  302. Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989: Rules, Norms, and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  303. Langer, Susanne K. 1942: Philosophy in a New Key. A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  304. Larkin, Jeremy 1994: Representations, Symbols and Social Facts: Durkheim in IR Theory, in: Millennium, 23: 2, 239-264. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  305. Larking, Emma 2017: Human Rights Rituals: Masking Neoliberalism and Inequality and Marginalizing Alternative World Views, in: Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 32: 1, 1-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  306. Laustsen, Carsten B./Wæver Ole 2000: In Defense of Religion: Sacred Referent Objects for Securitization, in: Millennium, 29: 3, 705-739. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  307. Leach, Edmund R. 1968: Ritual, in: Sills, David L. (Hrsg.): International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, Band 13, New York, 520-526. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  308. Lee, Ji-Young 2013: Diplomatic Ritual as Power Resource: The Politics of Asymmetry in Early Modern Chinese-Korean Relations, in: Journal of East Asian Studies, 13: 2, 309-336. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  309. Linklater, Andrew 2019: Symbols and World Politics: Towards a Long-term Perspective on Historical Trends and Contemporary Challenges, in: European Journal of International Relations, 25: 3, 931-954. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  310. Lukes, Steven 1973: Émile Durkheim. His Life and Work: A Historical and Critical Study, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  311. Lukes, Steven 1975: Political Ritual and Social Integration, in: Sociology, 9: 2, 289-308. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  312. Lute, Douglas/Burns, Nicholas 2019: NATO At Seventy. An Alliance in Crisis. Report by the Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, in: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/NATOatSeventy.pdf; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  313. Lynch, Cecelia 2020: Wrestling with God, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  314. Lynch, Gordon 2012: On the Sacred, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  315. Mälksoo, Maria 2012: The Challenge of Liminality for International Relations Theory, in: Review of International Studies, 38: 2, 481-494. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  316. Mälksoo, Maria 2020: A Ritual Approach to Deterrence: I am, Therefore I Deter, in: European Journal of International Relations (online first), DOI: 10.1177/1354066120966039. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  317. Mann, Michael 1970: The Social Cohesion of Liberal Democracy, in: American Sociological Review, 35, 423-439. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  318. Manners, Ian 2011: Symbolism in European Integration, in: Comparative European Politics, 9: 3, 243-268. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  319. Martel, Stéphanie 2020: The Polysemy of Security Community-Building: Toward a “People-Centered” Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)?, in: International Studies Quarterly, 64: 3, 588-599. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  320. Massimo, Rosati 2016: Ritual and the Sacred. A Neo-Durkheimian Analysis of Politics, Religion, and Self, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  321. McClymond, Kathryn T. 2016: Ritual Gone Wrong: What We Learn from Ritual Disruption, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  322. McNeill, William H. 1995: Keeping Together in Time: Dance and Drill in Human History, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  323. Mock, Steven J. 2012: Symbols of Defeat in the Construction of National Identity, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  324. Mosse, George L. 1990: Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  325. Michel, Torsten 2012: Time to Get Emotional: Phronetic Reflections on the Concept of Trust in International Relations, in: European Journal of International Relations, 18: 1, 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  326. Mitzen, Jennifer 2018: Anxious Community: EU As (In)Security Community, in: European Security, 27: 3, 393-413. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  327. NATO 1949: The North Atlantic Treaty, 4 April, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/ en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm; 20.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  328. NATO 1956: Report of the Committee of Three on Non-Military Cooperation in NATO, 13. Dezember, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_65237.htm; 3.12.2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  329. NATO 2003: How Will NATO Survive the Cold War? Video Lecture by Jamie Shea, Deputy Assistant Secretary for External Relations, 6. November, https://www.nato.int/ docu/speech/2003/s031106b.htm; 3.12.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  330. NATO 2007: Final Press Conference by the NATO Secretary General at the Meeting of NATO Defense Ministers, 25. Oktober, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_ 8560.htm?selectedLocale=en; 2.12.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  331. NATO 2014: “All for One, One for All”: NATO Secretary General Stresses Solidarity in Estonia, 20. November, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_114965.htm; 16.11.2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  332. NATO 2016a: The NATO Star – Then and Now, 30. Mai, in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iMY3eu9N-g; 18.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  333. NATO 2016b: The Hedgehog: NATO’s Lost Symbol? 20. Oktober, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/fr/natohq/declassified_136212.htm; 4.12.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  334. NATO 2018: We Are NATO, in: https://www.nato.int/wearenato; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  335. NATO 2020a: Keynote Speech by NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoană at the Atlantic Forum’s Conference “Transatlanticism 2020”, 2. Oktober, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_178550.htm?selectedLocale=en; 3.12.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  336. NATO 2020b: NATO 2030: United for a New Era. Analysis and Recommendations of the Reflection Group Appointed by the NATO Secretary General, 25. November, in: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/12/pdf/201201-Reflection-Group-Final-Report-Uni.pdf; 3.12.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  337. NATO 2020c: Remarks by the NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at the Ceremony Marking the Accession of North Macedonia to NATO, 30. März, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_174650.htm?selectedLocale=en; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  338. Neumann, Iver B. 2011: Euro-centric Diplomacy: Challenging but Manageable, in: European Journal of International Relations, 18: 2, 299-321. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  339. Neuman, Iver B. 2012: Introduction to the Forum on Liminality, in: Review of International Studies, 38: 2, 473-479. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  340. New York Herald Tribune 1950: Excerpts from Speech by Vincent Auriol at Bar-le-Duc, 24. Juli, in: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/history_pdf/20161130_ 19490404_France-s.pdf; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  341. Nisbet, Robert A. 1974: The Sociology of Émile Durkheim, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  342. Olesen, Thomas 2015: Global Injustice Symbols and Social Movements, Basingstoke. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  343. Oren, Ido/Solomon, Ty 2015: WMD, WMD, WMD: Securitisation through Ritualised Incantation of Ambiguous Phrases, in: Review of International Studies, 41: 2, 313-336. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  344. Pacher, Andreas 2018: The Ritual Creation of Political Symbols. International Exchanges in Public Diplomacy, in: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20: 4, 880-897. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  345. Pearson, Lester B. 1949: Remarks by the Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs During the Signing Ceremony of the North Atlantic Treaty, in: US Department of State Bulletin, 20: 511, 470-482. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  346. Phillips, Andrew 2018: Contesting the Confucian Peace: Civilization, Barbarism and International Hierarchy in East Asia, in: European Journal of International Relations, 24: 4, 740-767. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  347. Philpott, Daniel 2001: Revolutions in Sovereignty, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  348. Philpott, Daniel 2002: The Challenge of September 11 to Secularism in International Relations, in: World Politics, 55: 1, 66-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  349. Pickering, William S.F. 1984: Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories, Boston, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  350. Pouliot, Vincent 2008: The Logic of Practicality. A Theory of Practice of Security Communities, in: International Organization, 62: 2, 257-288. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  351. Pouliot, Vincent 2010: International Security in Practice. The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  352. Rappaport, Roy A. 1999: Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  353. Rathbun, Brian C. 2012: Trust in International Cooperation. International Security Institutions, Domestic Politics and American Multilateralism, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  354. Reuters 2016: Biden Tells Baltic States: Don’t Take Trump Seriously, 23. August, in: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-latvia-usa-biden/biden-tells-baltic-states-dont-take-trump-seriously-idUSKCN10Y0ZT; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  355. Risse-Kappen, Thomas 1996: Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO, in: Katzenstein, Peter J. (Hrsg.): The Culture of National Security, New York, NY, 357-399. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  356. Ross, Andrew 2006: Coming in from the Cold. Constructivism and Emotions, in: European Journal of International Relations, 12: 2, 197-222. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  357. Rossner, Meredith/Meher, Mythily 2014: Emotions in Ritual Theories, in: Stets, Jan E./Turner, Jonathan H. (Hrsg.): Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, Band 2, Dordrecht, 199-216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  358. Rubinstein, Robert A. 2005: Intervention and Culture: An Anthropological Approach to Peace Operations, in: Security Dialogue, 36: 4, 527-544. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  359. Ruggie, John G. 1986: Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis, in: World Politics, 35: 2, 261-285. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  360. Schirch, Lisa 2005: Ritual and Symbol in Peacebuilding, West Hartford, CT. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  361. Seligman, Adam B./Weller, Robert P. 2012: Rethinking Pluralism. Ritual, Experience, and Ambiguity, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  362. Sending, Ole Jacob/Pouliot, Vincent/Neumann, Iver B. (Hrsg.) 2015: Diplomacy and the Making of World Politic, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  363. Seul, Jeffrey R. 1999: Ours Is the Way of God: Religion, Identity and Intergroup Conflict, in: Journal of Peace Research, 36: 5, 553-569. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  364. Shea, Jamie 2009: 1949. NATO’s Anxious Birth, 5. März, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_139301.htm; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  365. Shils, Edward/Young Michael 1953: The Meaning of the Coronation, in: Sociological Review, 1: 2, 63-81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  366. Smith, Pierre 1982: Aspects of the Organization of Rites, in: Izard, Michael/Smith, Pierre (Hrsg.): Between Belief and Transgression: Structuralist Essays in Religion, History, and Myth, Chicago, IL, 103-128. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  367. Solomon, Ty 2019: Rhythm and Social Mobilization in International Relations, in: International Studies Quarterly, 63: 4, 1001-1013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  368. Spiegel International 2019: Political Disputes Overshadow Alliance Anniversary, 29. November, in: https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/political-disputes-overshadow-nato-military-successes-a-1298953.html; 20.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  369. Stedman Jones, Susan 2001: Durkheim Reconsidered, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  370. Steele, Brent J. 2007: Liberal-Idealism: A Constructivist Critique, in: International Studies Review, 9: 1, 23-52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  371. Stelzenmüller, Constanze 2017: Order from Chaos. Trump’s Abandonment of NATO in Brussels, 29. Mai, in: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/ 05/29/trumps-abandonment-of-nato-in-brussels; 7.10.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  372. The Guardian 2018: Europe Can No Longer Rely on US for Security, Says Emmanuel Macron, 27. August, in: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/27/europe-can-no-longer-rely-on-us-for-security-says-emmanuel-macron; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  373. The Washington Post 2017: Following Trump’s Trip Merkel Says Europe Can’t Rely on “Others”. She Means the US., 28. Mai, in: https://www.washingtonpost.com/ world/following-trumps-trip-merkel-says-europe-cant-rely-on-us-anymore/2017/ 05/28/4c6b92cc-43c1-11e7-8de1-cec59a9bf4b1_story.html; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  374. The Economist 2015: Article of Faith: If a NATO Member Comes Under Attack, 1. Juli, in: https://worldif.economist.com/article/12115/article-faith; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  375. The Economist 2019: Emmanuel Macron Warns Europe: NATO Is Becoming Brain-dead, 7. November, in: https://www.economist.com/europe/2019/11/07/emmanuel-macron-warns-europe-nato-is-becoming-brain-dead; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  376. The Guardian 2004a: Blair: “D-Day’s Outcome Was the Beginning of a New Europe”, 6. Juni, in: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/jun/06/past.interviews; 18.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  377. The Guardian 2004b: Keeping the Flame of Memory Alight, 7. Juni, in: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/jun/07/secondworldwar.world; 18.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  378. The Guardian 2004c: France Marks Final Reunion as Veterans Say Their Adieus, 6. Juni, in: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/jun/06/world.secondworldwar; 18.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  379. The New York Times 2004a: Normandy Gathering, and the Mistrust, Then and Now, 31. Mai, A3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  380. The New York Times 2004b: On Omaha Beach Today, Where’s the Comradeship, 5. Juni, A8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  381. The White House 2004: President Bush, President Chirac Mark 60th Anniversary of D-Day, 6. Juni, in: https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2004/06/ 20040606.html; 18.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  382. The White House 2014: Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to Joint United States and Romanian Participants in Carpathian Spring Military Exercise at Otopeni Military Airbase, 20. Mai, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/05/20/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-joint-united-states-and-romanian-partic; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  383. Theiler, Tobias 2005: Political Symbolism and European Integration, Manchester. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  384. Thomas, Scott M. 2005: The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations. The Struggle for the Soul of the Twentieth Century, Basingstoke. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  385. Travouillon, Katrin/Bernath, Julie 2020: Time to Break up with the International Community? Rhetoric and Realities of a Political Myth in Cambodia, in: Review of International Studies (online first), DOI:10.1017/S026021052000042X. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  386. Trondal, Jarle/Peters, B. Guy 2013: The Rise of European Administrative Space: Lessons Learned, in: Journal of European Public Policy, 20: 2, 295-307. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  387. Turner, Victor 1967: The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  388. Turner, Jonathan H./Stets, Jan E. 2005: The Sociology of Emotions, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  389. US Naval Institute 2019: Estonian Foreign Minister Makes a Case for NATO, 8. Oktober, in: https://news.usni.org/2019/10/08/estonian-foreign-minister-makes-a-case-for-nato; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  390. Van Gennep, Arnold 1960: The Rites of Passage, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  391. Verba, Sidney 1965: The Kennedy Assassination and the Nature of Political Commitment, in: Greenberg, Bradley S./Parker, Edward B. (Hrsg.): The Kennedy Assassination and the American Public: Social Communication in Crisis, Stanford, CA, 348-360. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  392. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986: Reflection on “Theory of International Politics”. A Response to My Critics, in: Keohane, Robert O. (Hrsg.): Neorealism and Its Critics, New York, NY, 330-336. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  393. Walzer, Michael 1967: On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought, in: Political Science Quarterly, 82: 2, 191-204. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  394. Warner, W. Lloyd 1959: The Living and the Dead: A Study of the Symbolic Life of Americans, New Haven, CT. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  395. Warren, Patrick T. 2010: Alliance History and the Future of NATO: What the Last 500 Years of Alliance Behavior Tells Us About NATO’s Path Forward, 21st Century Defense Initiative Policy Paper, 30. Juni, in: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/0630_nato_alliance_warren.pdf; 20.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  396. Wedeen, Lisa 2015: Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric and Symbols in Contemporary Syria, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  397. Weisbrode, Kenneth 2017: The Atlanticists. A Story of American Diplomacy, Orange County, CA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  398. Weldes, Jutta 1999: Constructing the National Interest: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis, Minneapolis, MI. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  399. Wendt, Alexander. 1999: Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  400. Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2018: Trusting Enemies. Interpersonal Relationships in International Conflict, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  401. Williams, Michael C. 2007: Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security, Abingdon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  402. Wong, Seanon S. 2016: Emotions and the Communication of Intentions in Face-to-Face Diplomacy, in: European Journal of International Relations, 22: 1, 144-167. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  403. Wong, Seanon S. 2020: One-Upmanship and Putdowns: The Aggressive Use of Interaction Rituals in Face-to-Face Diplomacy, in: International Theory (online first), DOI:10.1017/S1752971920000196, 1-31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  404. Wydra, Harald 2015: Politics and the Sacred, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  405. ZDF 2020: Inside NATO. Teil 1: Eine amerikanische Erfindung? 11. Juni, in: https://www.zdf.de/dokumentation/zdfinfo-doku/inside-nato-eine-amerikanische-erfindung-102.html; 16.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-38
  406. Abboud, Samer/Dahi, Omar S./Hazbun, Waleed/Grove, Nicole S./Hindawi, Coralie P./Mouawad, Jamil /Hermez, Sami 2018: Towards a Beirut School of critical security studies, in: Critical Studies Security 6, 273-295. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  407. Ackerman, Eliott, et.al, 2020. A Letter on Justice and Open Debate. Harpers Magazine Website, erschienen am 7. Juli 2020, in: https://harpers.org/archive/2020/10/on-justice-and-open-debate/; 22.10.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  408. Aradau, Claudia 2018: From securitization theory to critical approaches to (in)security, in: European Journal for International Security 3, 300-305. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  409. Aradau, Claudia/Huysmans, Jef 2014: Critical methods in International Relations: The politics of techniques, devices and acts, in: European Journal of International Relations. 20, 596-619. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  410. Baele, Stephane J./Bettiza, Gregorio 2021: ‘Turning’ everywhere in IR: on the sociological underpinnings of the field’s proliferating turns, in: International Theory 13, 314-340. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000172. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  411. Balzacq, Thierry 2011: A theory of securitization: Origins, core assumptions, and variants, in: Balzacq, Thierry (Hrsg.), Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Abingdon, 1-30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  412. Balzacq, Thierry 2005: The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context, in: European Journal of International Relations. 11, 171-2001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  413. Bertrand, Sarah 2018a: Can the subaltern securitize? Postcolonial perspectives on securitization theory and its critics, in: European Journal for International Security. 3, 281-299. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2018.3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  414. Bertrand, Sarah 2018b: Can the subaltern (in)securitize? A rejoinder to Claudia Aradau, in: European Journal for International Security. 3, 306-309. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2018.15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  415. Best, Joel 2006: Blumer’s Dilemma: The Critic as a Tragic Figure, in: The American Sociologist 37, 5-14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  416. Bigo, Didier 2014: The (in)securitization practices of the three universes of EU border control: Military/Navy – border guards/police – database analysts, in: Security Dialogue 45, 209-225. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614530459. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  417. Bigo, Didier 2000: When Two Become One: Internal and External Securitisations in Europe, in: Kelstrup, Morten/Williams, Michael (Hrsg.), International Relations Theory and The Politics of European Integration. Power, Security and Community, 171-204. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  418. Bilgin, Pinar 2011: The politics of studying securitization? The Copenhagen School in Turkey, in: Security Dialogue 42, 399-412. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611418711. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  419. Blumer, Herbert 1980: Der Methodologische Standort des Symbolischen Interaktionismus, in: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen (Hrsg.), Alltagswissen, Interaktion und Gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Wiesbaden, 80-146. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  420. Blumer, Herbert: 1954: What is Wrong with Social Theory? in: American Sociology Revue 19, 3-10. (online first) https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  421. Booth, Ken 1991: Security and Emancipation, in: Revue International Studies 17, 313-326. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  422. Browning, Christopher S./McDonald, Matt 2013: The future of critical security studies: Ethics and the politics of security, in: European Journal of International Relations 19, 235-255. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111419538. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  423. Buzan, Barry/Wæver, Ole/Wilde, Jaap de 1997: Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, Colorado. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  424. Conze, Eckart 2017: Geschichte der Sicherheit: Entwicklung – Themen – Perspektiven. ‎ Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  425. Côté, Adam 2016: Agents without agency: Assessing the role of the audience in securitization theory, in: Security Dialogue 47, 541-558. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616672150. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  426. DuBois, W.E.B. 2007 [1903]: The Souls of Black Folk, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  427. Fanon, Frantz 1981 [1961]: Die Verdammten dieser Erde, 14. Auflage, Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  428. Hansen, Lene 2020: Are ‘core’feminist critiques of securitization theory racist? A reply to Alison Howell and Melanie Richter-Montpetit, in: Security Dialogue, 51(4), 378-385. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  429. Hansen, Lene 2000: The Little Mermaid's silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School, in: Millennium, 29(2), 285-306. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  430. Hayes, J. 2020: It isn’t just about Wæver and Buzan, erschienen bei: Duck of Minerva: https://duckofminerva.com/2020/05/it-isnt-just-about-waever-and-buzan.html; 22.10.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  431. Howell, Alison/Richter-Montpetit, Melanie 2019: Is securitization theory racist? Civilizationism, methodological whiteness, and antiblack thought in the Copenhagen School, in: Security Dialogue 53, 3-23. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619862921. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  432. Huysmans, J. (2002). Defining social constructivism in security studies: The normative dilemma of writing security. Alternatives, 27(1_suppl), 41-62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  433. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996: Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen, 13. Auflage, Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  434. McDonald, Matt 2008: Securitization and the Construction of Security, in: European Journal of International Relations 14, 563-587. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097553. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  435. Michelsen, Nicholas 2020: What is a minor international theory? On the limits of ‘Critical International Relations.’, in: Journal of International Political Theory Vol 17, Issue 3, 2021. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088220956680. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  436. Thaddeus Jackson, P., Nexon, D., 2020: Episode 9 – Race and Securitization Theory. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  437. Villa, Paula-Irene/Speck, Sarah 2020: Das Unbehagen mit den Gender Studies: Open Gender Journal 4. (online first) https://doi.org/10.17169/ogj.2020.141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  438. Vuori, Juha A. 2014: Critical Security and Chinese Politics: The Anti-Falungong Campaign, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  439. Vuori, Juha A. 2008: Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization: Applying the Theory of Securitization to the Study of Non-Democratic Political Orders, in: European Journal of International Relations 14, 65-99. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087767. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  440. Wæver, Ole/Buzan, Barry 2020a: Racism and responsibility – The critical limits of deepfake methodology in security studies: A reply to Howell and Richter-Montpetit. in: Security Dialogue 53, 386-294. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010620916153. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  441. Wæver, Ole/Buzan, Barry 2020b: Racism, Reading and Responsibility: Securitization Theory, Systemic Racism in Security Studies and Methodologies for Excavating Foundational Flaws in Theorie. Verfügbar: https://cric.ku.dk/publications/racismreply/; 22.10.2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  442. Wilkinson, Claire 2007: The Copenhagen School on Tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is Securitization Theory Useable Outside Europe? in: Security Dialogue 38, 5-25. (online first) https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607075964. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-70
  443. Albert, Mathias 2020: Presentation: El Futuro de la Antárdida Desde Una Mirada Global, in: Argüello, Jorge (Hrsg.): A 60 Años del Acuerdo de Washington: El Futura del Tratado Antárctico, Buenos Aires, 27-32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  444. Bertelsen, Rasmus Gjedssø 2020: Science Diplomacy and the Arctic, in: Gjørv, Gunhild Hoogensen/Lanteigne, Marc/Sam-Aggrey, Horatio (Hrsg.): Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security, London, 234-245. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  445. Brady, Anne-Marie 2017: China as a Global Great Power, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  446. Burke, Danita Catherine 2019: Club Diplomacy in the Arctic, in: Global Governance 25: 2, 304-326. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  447. Dodds, Klaus/Nuttall, Mark 2016: The Scramble for the Poles. The Geopolitics of the Arctic and Antarctic, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  448. Gjørv, Gunhild Hoogensen/Hodgson, Kara K. 2021: Comprehensive Security in the Arctic: Beyond “Arctic Exceptionalism”, in: Depledge, Duncan/Lackenbauer, P. Whiney (Hrsg.): On Thin Ice? Perspectives on Arctic Security, Peterborough, 1-11. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  449. Eco, Umberto 2015: Die Geschichte der legendären Länder und Städte, München. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  450. Heininen, Lassi 2021: The Global-Arctic Mission Council, in: https://www.arcticcircle.org/journal/the-globalarctic-mission-council-journal; 12.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  451. IPCC 2019: Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, in: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/SROCC_FinalDraft_FullReport_Cor.pdf; 12.12.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  452. Käpylä, Juha/Mikkola, Harri 2019: Contemporary Arctic Meets World Politics: Rethinking Arctic Exceptionalism in the Age of Uncertainty, in: Finger, Matthias/Heininen, Lassi (Hrsg.): The GlobalArctic Handbook, Cham, 153-169. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  453. Knecht, Sebastian/Albert, Mathias 2021: The Arctic is What Scientists Make of it: Integrating Geopolitics into Informed Decisionmaking, in: Berkmann, Paulet al. (Hrsg.): Building Common Interests in the Arctic Ocean with Global Inclusion, Cham (i.E.). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  454. Krasner, Stephen D. 1999: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  455. Myhre, Jeffrey D. 2019: The Antarctic Treaty System. Politics, Law, and Diplomacy, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  456. O’Reilly, Jessica 2017: Technocratic Antarctic: An Ethnography of Scientific Expertise and Environmental Governance, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  457. Paul, Michael 2020: Arktische Seewege. Zwiespältige Aussichten im Nordpolarmeer (SWP-Studie 14), Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  458. Spohr, Kristina/Hamilton, Daniel S. 2021: From Last Frontier to First Frontier: The Arctic and World Order, in: Spohr, Kristina/Hamilton, Daniel S. (Hrsg.): The Arctic and World Order, Washington, DC, 1-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  459. Ulfstein, Geir 1995: The Svalbard Treaty. From Terra Nullius to Norwegian Sovereignty, Oslo. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  460. Woon, Chih Yuan/Dodds, Klaus (Hrsg.) 2020: ‚Observing‘ the Arctic. Asia in the Arctic Council and Beyond, Cheltenham. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  461. Young, Oran R. 2021: Shifting Ground: Competing Policy Narratives and the Future of the Arctic, in: Spohr, Kristina/Hamilton, Daniel S. (Hrsg.): The Arctic and World Order, Washington, DC, 47-62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-86
  462. Anderson, David H. 2009: The Status Under International Law of the Maritime Areas Around Svalbard, in: Ocean Development & International Law 40: 4, S. 373-384. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  463. Åtland, Kristian/Pedersen, Torbjørn 2008: The Svalbard Archipelago in Russian Security Policy: Overcoming the Legacy of Fear – or Reproducing It?, in: European Security 17: 2-3, S. 227-251. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  464. Berg, Roald 2016: Norsk Utanrikspolitikk etter 1814, Oslo. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  465. Berg, Roald 2017: Norway, Spitsbergen, and America, 1905-1920, in: Diplomacy & Statecraft 28: 1, S. 20-38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  466. Berg, Roald 2020: The Svalbard ‚Channel‘, 1920-2020 – A Geopolitical Sketch, in: Weber, Joachim (Hrsg.): Handbook on Geopolitics and Security in the Arctic. The High North Between Cooperation and Confrontation, Cham, S. 303-321. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  467. Borgerson, Scott G. 2008: Arctic Meltdown. The Economic and Security Implications of Global Warming, in: Foreign Affairs 87: 2, S. 63-77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  468. Byers, Michael 2014: International Law and the Arctic, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  469. Bull, Hedley 1990: The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations, in: Bull, Hedley, et al. (Hrsg.): Hugo Grotius and International Relations, Oxford, S. 65-94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  470. Churchill, Robin/Ulfstein, Geir 2010: The Disputed Maritime Zones Around Svalbard, in: Nordquist, Myron H, et al. (Hrsg.): Changes in the Arctic Environment and the Law of the Sea, Leiden, S. 551-594. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  471. Corradetti, Claudio 2017: Thinking with Kant “Beyond” Kant: Actualizing Sovereignty and Citizenship in the Transnational Sphere, in: Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 50, S. 59-82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  472. Côté, Guy-Serge/Paterson, Matthew 2014: Ecological Sovereignty and Arctic Politics, in: Murray, Robert W./Nuttall, Anita Dey (Hrsg.): International Relations and the Arctic: Understanding Policy and Governance, Amherst, NY, S. 105-128. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  473. Eberl, Oliver 2008: Demokratie und Frieden. Kants Friedensschrift in den Kontroversen der Gegenwart, Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  474. Flamm, Patrick 2021: Antarktis im Wandel: vom Vorbild zum Auslaufmodell internationaler Kooperation?, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 28: 2, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  475. Flikschuh, Katrin 2010: Kant's Sovereignty Dilemma: A Contemporary Analysis, in: Journal of Political Philosophy 18: 4, S. 469-493. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  476. Grewe, Wilhelm G 1984: Epochen der Völkerrechtsgeschichte, Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  477. Grotius, Hugo 1609/2000: Mare Liberum [übersetzt aus dem Lateinischen von Humphrey Milford], Kitchener. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  478. Grotius, Hugo 1625/2001: On the Law of War and Peace [übersetzt aus dem Lateinischen von A.C. Campbell], Kitchener. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  479. Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes 2022: Die „Eingebundenheit“ der Polargebiete: Zeit für einen Metaphernwechsel in den Internationalen Beziehungen?, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 28: 2, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  480. Hoffmann-Loerzer, Günter 1968: Grotius, in: Maier, Hans, et al. (Hrsg.): Klassiker des Politischen Denkens, München, S. 293-320. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  481. Humrich, Christoph 2018: Souveränitätsdenken und Seerecht. Regionalisierung von Meerespolitik in der Arktis als neue Staatsräson, in: Albert, Mathias, et al. (Hrsg.): Ordnung und Regieren in der Weltgesellschaft, Wiesbaden, S. 211-241. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  482. Ingimundarson, Valur 2018: The Geopolitics of the ‘Future Return’: Britain's Century-Long Challenges to Norway's Control over the Spitsbergen Archipelago, in: International History Review 40: 4, S. 893-915. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  483. Ittersum, Martine Julia van 2010: The Long Goodbye: Hugo Grotius’ Justification of Dutch Expansion Overseas, 1615–1645, in: History of European Ideas 36: 4, S. 386-411. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  484. Jensen, Øystein Hønsi 2020: The Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty, in: Arctic Review on Law and Politics 11, S. 82-107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  485. Kaltenborn, Bjørn P./Østreng, Willy/Hovelsrud, Grete K. 2020: Change will be the Constant. Future Environmental Policy and Governance Challenges in Svalbard, in: Polar Geography 43: 1, S. 25-45. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  486. Kant, Immanuel 1795/1968: Zum Ewigen Frieden, in: Weischedel, Wilhelm (Hrsg.): Kant. Werke in Zwölf Bänden. Band11, Frankfurt am Main, S. 193-251. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  487. Kant, Immanuel 1797/1968: Metaphysik der Sitten, in: Weischedel, Wilhelm (Hrsg.): Kant. Werke in Zwölf Bänden. Band 8, Frankfurt am Main, S. 309-634. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  488. Keene, Edward 2002: Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  489. Koivurova, Timo/Holiencin, Filip 2017: Demilitarisation and Neutralisation of Svalbard: How has the Svalbard Regime Been Able to Meet the Changing Security Realities During Almost 100 Years of Existence?, in: Polar Record 53: 2, S. 131-142. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  490. Kuhn, Annegret/Treffenfeldt Montoya, Valentina 2022: Indigene Souveränität und die Governance von Territorialität in der Arktis, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 28: 2, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  491. Lansing, Robert 1917: A Unique International Problem, in: American Journal of International Law 11:4, S. 763-771. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  492. Liu, Nengye 2021: China and one Hundred Years of the Svalbard Treaty: Past, Present and Future, in: Marine Policy 124, S. 104354. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  493. Moe, Arild/Jensen, Øystein 2020: Svalbard og Havområdene–nye Utenrikspolitiske Utfordringer for Norge?, in: International Politik 78: 4, S. 511-522. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  494. Murray, Robert W./Nuttall, Anita Dey 2014: Introduction: Understanding Policy and Governance in the Arctic, in: Murray, Robert W./Nuttall, Anita Dey (Hrsg.): International Relations and the Arctic: Understanding Policy and Governance, Amherst, NY, S. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  495. Østhagen, Andreas/Raspotnik, Andreas 2018: Crab! How a Dispute over Snow Crab Became a Diplomatic Headache Between Norway and the EU, in: Marine Policy 98, S. 58-64. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  496. Østhagen, Andreas/Raspotnik, Andreas 2019: Why Is the European Union Challenging Norway Over Snow Crab? Svalbard, Special Interests, and Arctic Governance, in: Ocean Development & International Law 50: 2/3, S. 190-208. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  497. Østhagen, Andreas/Jørgensen, Anne-Kristin/Moe, Arild 2020: The Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone: How Russia and Norway manage an Arctic dispute, in: Arctic and North 40, S. 150-168, in: http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/en/article_index_years.php?ELEMENT_ID=350135; 29.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  498. Østreng, Willi 1978: Politics in High Latitudes. The Svalbard Archipelago, Montreal. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  499. Pedersen, Torbjørn 2009a: Denmark's Policies Toward the Svalbard Area, in: Ocean Development & International Law 40: 4, S. 319-332. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  500. Pedersen, Torbjørn 2009b: Norway's Rule on Svalbard: Tightening the Grip on the Arctic Islands, in: Polar Record 45: 2, S. 147-152. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  501. Pedersen, Torbjørn 2011: International Law and Politics in U.S. Policymaking: The United States and the Svalbard Dispute, in: Ocean Development & International Law 42: 1/2, S. 120-135. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  502. Pedersen, Torbjørn/Henriksen, Tore 2009: Svalbard's Maritime Zones: The End of Legal Uncertainty?, in: International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 24: 1, S. 141-161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  503. Reus-Smit, Christian 1999: The Moral Purpose of the State. Culture, Social Identity and Institutional Rationality in International Relations, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  504. Rossi, Christopher R. 2015: A Unique International Problem: The Svalbard Treaty, Equal Enjoyment, and Terra Nullius: Lessons of Territorial Temptation from History, in: Washington University Global Studies Law Review 15: 1, S. 93-136. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  505. Rossi, Christopher R. 2017a: Norway's Imperiled Sovereignty Claim over Svalbard's Adjacent Waters, in: German Law Journal 18: 6, S. 1497-1530. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  506. Rossi, Christopher R. 2017b: Sovereignty and Territorial Temptation. The Grotian Moment, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  507. Schwarz, Rolf/Jütersonke, Oliver 2005: Divisible sovereignty and the reconstruction of Iraq, in: Third World Quarterly 26: 4-5, S. 649-665. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  508. Singh, Elen C. 1980: The Spitsbergen (Svalbard) Question: United States Foreign Policy, 1907-1935, Oslo. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  509. Todorov, Andrey 2020: Russia in Maritime Areas off Spitsbergen (Svalbard): Is it Worth Opening the Pandora's Box?, in: Marine Policy 122, 104264. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  510. Ulfstein, Geir 1995: The Svalbard Treaty. From Terra Nullius to Norwegian Sovereignty, Oslo. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  511. Vollenhoven, Cornelius van 1919: Die Drei Stufen des Völkerrechts, Den Haag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  512. Vollenhoven, Cornelius van 1925: Grotius and the Study of Law, in: The American Journal of International Law 19: 1, S. 1-11. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  513. Young, Oran R. 2016: Governing the Antipodes: International Cooperation in Antarctica and the Arctic, in: Polar Record 52: 2, S. 230-238. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-96
  514. Antonello, Alessandro 2019: The Greening of Antarctica: Assembling an International Environment, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  515. Australische Regierung 2020: Australian Antarctic Treaty Inspections, January/February 2020, Report, in: https://www.antarctica.gov.au/site/assets/files/47743/report_of_australian_ antarctic_treaty_inspections_2020.pdf; 16.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  516. Bastmeijer, Kees 2018: Introduction: The Madrid Protocol 1998–2018. The Need to Address ‘the Success Syndrome’, in: The Polar Journal 8: 2, 230-240. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  517. Beck, Peter J. 1986: The International Politics of Antarctica, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  518. Bergin, Anthony/Press, Anthony 2020: Eyes Wide Open: Managing the Australia – China Antarctic Relationship, in: Special Report 153, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/ad-aspi/2020-04/SR%20153%20Eyes%20wide%20open_0.pdf?VersionId=shRIRhjKiNG0yNRY0PgB.Y5ZeAJq0XDq; 16.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  519. Block, George 2021: Defence Force Launches New Southern Ocean Patrol Vessel Project, Price Tag $300m+, in: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300310572/defence-force-launches-new-southern-ocean-patrol-vessel-project-price-tag-300m; 16.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  520. Bloom, Lisa E. 1993: Gender on Ice: American Ideologies of Polar Expeditions, Minneapolis. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  521. Brady, Anne-Marie 2017: China as a Global Great Power, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  522. Brady, Anne-Marie 2012: Opinion: Democratising Antarctic Governance, in: The Polar Journal 2: 2, 451-461. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  523. Chaturvedi, Sanjay 2013: Antarctic as ‘Global Knowledge Commons’: Geopolitics, Science and Trusteeship, in: Ramesh, Rengaswamy/Sudhakar, M./Chattopadhyay, Sulagana (Hrsg.): Scientific and Geopolitical Interests in Arctic and Antarctic, New Delhi: 11–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  524. Chown, Stephen L. 2017: Antarctic Environmental Challenges in a Global Context, in: Dodds, Klaus/Hemmings, Alan D./Roberts Peder (Hrsg.): Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, Cheltenham, 523–539. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  525. Cooley, Alexander/Nexon, Daniel 2020: Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  526. Corry, Olaf/Stevenson, Hayley 2018: IR and the Earth: Societal Multiplicity and Planetary Singularity, in: Corry, Olaf/Stevenson, Hayley (Hrsg.): Traditions and Trends in Global Environmental Politics: International Relations and the Earth, Abingdon, 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  527. Dodds, Klaus/Collis, Christy 2017: Post-colonial Antarctica, in: Dodds, Klaus/Hemmings, Alan D./Roberts Peder (Hrsg.): Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, Cheltenham, 50-68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  528. Dodds, Klaus/Nuttall, Mark 2016: The Scramble for the Poles: The Geopolitics of the Arctic and Antarctic, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  529. Dryzek, John S./Pickering, Jonathan 2018: The Politics of the Anthropocene, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  530. Elzinga, Aant 2011: Origin and Limitations of the Antarctic Treaty, in: Berkman, Paul A./Lang, Michael A./Walton, David W.H./Young, Oran (Hrsg.): Science diplomacy: Antarctica, Science, and the Governance of International Spaces, Washington D.C., 59-68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  531. Elzinga, Aant 2017: The Continent for Science, in: Dodds, Klaus/Hemmings, Alan D./Roberts Peder (Hrsg.): Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, Cheltenham, 103-124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  532. Ferrada, Luis Valentín 2018: Five Factors That Will Decide the Future of Antarctica. in: The Polar Journal 8: 1, 84-109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  533. Flamm, Patrick 2019: 60 Jahre Antarktisvertrag: Multilateralismus mit Zukunft, in: GIGA Focus Global 6, 1-10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  534. Flamm, Patrick 2021: An Unlikely Partnership? New Zealand–South Korea Bilateral Cooperation and Antarctic Order, in: Polar Record 57 (E4). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  535. Frame, Bob/Yermakova, Yelena/Flamm, Patrick/Nicklin, Germana/de Paula, Gabriel/Badhe, Renuka/Tuñez, Francisco 2021: Antarctic Gateways and Gatekeepers: Polar Scenarios in a Polarising Anthropocene, in: The Anthropocene Review, Juni. (online first), DOI: 10.1177/20530196211026341. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  536. Gray, Andrew D./Hughes, Kevin A. 2016: Demonstration of ‘Substantial Research Activity’ To Acquire Consultative Status Under the Antarctic Treaty, Polar Research, 35: 34061. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  537. Hamzah, B.A. 2010: Malaysia and the Southern Ocean: Revisiting the Question of Antarctica, in: Ocean Development & International Law, 41: 2, 186-195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  538. Haward, Marcus 2017: The Originals: The Role and Influence of the Original Signatories to the Antarctic Treaty, in: Dodds, Klaus/Hemmings, Alan D./Roberts Peder (Hrsg.): Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, Cheltenham, 232-240. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  539. Haward, Marcus/McGee, Jeffrey 2021: Antarctic Geopolitics: Emerging Cracks in the Ice?, in: https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2021/02/03/antarctic-geopolitics-emerging-cracks-in-the-ice/; 16.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  540. Hemmings, Alan D. 2009: Beyond Claims: Towards a Non-Territorial Antarctic Security Prism for Australia and New Zealand, in: New Zealand Yearbook of International Law 1: 1, 55-72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  541. Hemmings Alan D. 2011: Why Did We Get An International Space Station Before An International Antarctic Station?, in: The Polar Journal 1: 1, 5-16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  542. Hemmings, Alan D. 2017: Antarctic Politics in a Transforming Global Geopolitics, in: Dodds, Klaus/Hemmings, Alan D./Roberts Peder (Hrsg.): Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, Cheltenham, 507–522. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  543. Hemmings, Alan D. 2020a: Challenges to Substantive Demilitarisation in the Antarctic Treaty Area, in: Alfredsson, Gudmundur/Koivurova, Timo (Hrsg.): The Yearbook of Polar Law, Band 12, Leiden, 172–194. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  544. Hemmings, Alan D. 2020b: Subglacial Nationalism, in: Leane, Elizabeth/McGee, Jeffrey (Hrsg.): Anthropocene Antarctica: Perspectives from the Humanities, Law and Social Sciences, London, 33-55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  545. Hemmings, Alan D./Chaturvedi, Sanjay/Leane, Elizabeth/Liggett, Daniela/Salazar, Juan Francisco 2015: Nationalism in Today’s Antarctic, in: Alfredsson, Gudmundur/Koivurova, Timo (Hrsg.): The Yearbook of Polar Law, Band 7, Leiden, 531–555. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  546. Hemmings, Alan D./Dodds, Klaus/Roberts, Peder 2017: Introduction: The Politics of Antarctica, in: Dodds, Klaus/Hemmings, Alan D./Roberts Peder (Hrsg.): Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, Cheltenham, 1-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  547. Jabour, Julia 2018: Explainer: What Any Country Can and Can’t Do in Antarctica, in The Name of Science, in: https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-any-country-can-and-cant-do-in-antarctica-in-the-name-of-science-105858; 16.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  548. Launius, Roger D. 2017: Establishing Open Rights in the Antarctic and Outer Space: Cold War Rivalries and Geopolitics in the 1950s and 1960s, in: Dodds, Klaus/Hemmings, Alan D./Roberts Peder (Hrsg.): Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, Cheltenham, 217–231. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  549. Leane, Elizabeth and Jeffrey McGee (Hrsg.) 2020: Anthropocene Antarctica; Perspectives from the Humanities, Law and Social Sciences, London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  550. Lewis, Simon/Maslin, Mark 2018: The Human Planet: How We Created the Anthropocene, New Haven, CT. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  551. Liggett, Daniela/Frame, Bob/Gilbert, Neil/Morgan, Fraser 2017: Is it all Going South? Four Future Scenarios for Antarctica, in: Polar Record 53: 5, 459-478. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  552. Lövbrand, Eva/Mobjörk, Malin/Söder, Rickard 2020: The Anthropocene and the Geo-political Imagination: Re-writing Earth as Political Space, in: Earth System Governance 4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  553. Nielsen, Hanne E. F./Philpott, Carolyn 2018: Depths and Surfaces: Understanding the Antarctic Region Through the Humanities and Social Sciences, in; The Polar Journal 8:1, 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  554. Nature 2018: Reform the Antarctic Treaty, in: www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05368-7; 16.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  555. Portella Sampaio, Daniela 2019: The Antarctic Exception: How Science and Environmental Protection Provided Alternative Authority Deployment and Territoriality in Antarctica, in: Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs 11: 2, 107-119. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  556. Roberts, Peder 2020: Does the Science Criterion Rest on Thin Ice? in: Geographical Journal 00, 1– 7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  557. Roberts, Peder/Howkins, Adrien/van der Watt, Lize-Marié 2016: Antarctica: A Continent for the Humanities, in: Roberts, Peder/ van der Watt, Lize-Marié/Howkins, Adrien (Hrsg.): Antarctica and the Humanities, London, 1-23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  558. Scott, Karen 2003: Institutional Developments within the Antarctic Treaty System, in: The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52: 2, 473-487. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  559. Simangan, Dalia 2020: Where is the Anthropocene? IR in a New Geological Epoch, in: International Affairs 96, 211-224. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  560. Stone, Christopher D. 2010: Should Trees Have Standing? Law, Morality, and the Environment, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  561. Watts, Jonathan 2020: 'A Real Bad Precedent': Australia Criticised for Antarctica Airport Plan, in: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/31/a-real-bad-precedent-australia-criticised-for-antarctica-airport-plan; 16.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  562. Wehi, Pricilla M./van Uitregt, Vincent/Scott, Nigel J./Gillies, Tasman/Beckwith, Jacinta/Pryor Rodgers, Rata/Watene, Krushil 2021: Transforming Antarctic Management and Policy With an Indigenous Māori Lens, in: Nature Ecology & Evolution 5, 1055-1059. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  563. Wehrmann, Dorothea 2016: The Polar Regions as ‘Barometers’ in the Anthropocene: Towards a New Significance of Non-state Actors In International Cooperation?, in: The Polar Journal 6:2, 379-397. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  564. Yao, Joanne 2021: An international hierarchy of science: conquest, cooperation, and the 1959 Antarctic Treaty System, in: European Journal of International Relations (online first), DOI: 10.1177/13540661211033889. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  565. Youatt, Rafi 2017: Personhood and the Rights of Nature: The New Subjects of Contemporary Earth Politics, in: International Political Sociology 11: 1, 39–54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  566. Young, Claire 2021: Eyes on the Prize: Australia, China, and the Antarctic Treaty System, in: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/eyes-on-prize-australia-china-and-antarctic-treaty-system; 16.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  567. Young, Oran 2010: Institutional Dynamics: Emergent Patterns in International Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-114
  568. ANCS 1971: Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. Abgeschlossen 18. Dezember 1971, in: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-85/pdf/STATUTE-85-Pg688.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  569. Arctic Council 1996: Arctic Council. Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council, Ottawa, Canada, September 19, 1996, in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/85/EDOCS-1752-v2-ACMMCA00_Ottawa_1996_Founding_Declaration.PDF; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  570. Arctic Council 2021: Arctic Council Strategic Plan 2021-2030, in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/2601/MMIS12_2021_REYKJAVIK_Strategic-Plan_2021-2030.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  571. Arctic Council 2009: Tromso Declaration, in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/91/06_tromso_declaration_2009_signed%20%281%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  572. Arctic Council 2017: Fairbanks Declaration, in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/1910/EDOCS-4339-v1-ACMMUS10_FAIRBANKS_2017_Fairbanks_Declaration_Brochure_Version_w_Layout.PDF?sequence=8&isAllowed=y; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  573. Arctic Council 2021: Reykjavik Declaration, in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/2600/2021%20Reykjavik%20Declaration%2020-5-2021.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  574. Barker Betsy 2013: Offshore Oil and Gas Development in the Arctic: What the Arctic Council and International Law Can and Cannot Do, in: American Society of International Law Proceedings 107, 275-280. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  575. Byers, Michael 2013: International Law and the Arctic, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  576. CAFF 2015: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) for the Arctic: A Scoping Study, in: https://www.caff.is/assessment-series/323-the-economics-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-teeb-for-the-arctic-a-scoping-study; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  577. CAFF 2019: Arctic Coastal Biodiversity Monitoring Plan, in: https://www.caff.is/coastal/coastal-monitoring-publications/473-arctic-coastal-biodiversity-monitoring-plan; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  578. CAFF 2021: Arctic Wetlands and Indigenous Peoples Study, in: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/2636; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  579. Coote, Michaela L. 2016: Environmental Decision-Making in the Arctic Council: What is the Role of Indigenous Peoples?, in: Heininen, Lassi/Exner-Pirot, Heather/Piouffe, Joel (Hrsg.): Arctic Yearbook 2016, Akureyri, 30-47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  580. Coté, Charlotte 2016: 'Indigenizing' Food Sovereignty, Revitalizing Indigenous. Food Practices and Ecological Knowledges in Canada and the United States, in: Thornber, Karen L./Havens, Tom (Hrsg,): Global Indigeneities and the Environment, 107-126. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  581. Cowan, Anna 2013: UNDRIP and the Intervention. Indigenous Self-Determination, Participation, and Racial Discrimination in the Northern Territory of Australia, in: Washington International Law Journal 22: 2, 274-310. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  582. Finnemore, Martha/Sikkink, Kathryn 2001: TAKING STOCK: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics, in: Annual Review Political Science 4:1, 391-416. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  583. Gerhardt, Hannes 2011: The Inuit and Sovereignty: The Case of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference and Greenland, in: Politik 14: 1, 6-14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  584. GSA 2008: Greenland Self-Government Act, in: https://naalakkersuisut.gl/~/media/Nanoq/Files/Attached%20Files/Engelske-tekster/Act%20on%20Greenland.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  585. Göcke, Katja 2016: Indigene Landrechte im internationalen Vergleich: eine rechtsvergleichende Studie der Anerkennung indigener Landrechte in Kanada, den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, Neuseeland, Australien, Russland und Dänemark/Grönland. Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  586. Hossain, Kamrul/Raheem, Dele/Cormier, Shaun 2018: Food Security Governance in the Arctic-Barents Region, Cham. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  587. ICC 2009: Inuit Declaration on Arctic Sovereignty, in: https://iccalaska.org/wp-icc/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Signed-Inuit-Sovereignty-Declaration-11x17.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  588. ICC 2009: Inuit Arctic Policy, in: https://secureservercdn.net/104.238.71.250/hh3.0e7.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/Inuit-Arctic-Policy.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  589. ICC 2015: Circumpolar Inuit Response to Arctic Shipping Workshop Proceedings, in: https://secureservercdn.net/104.238.71.250/hh3.0e7.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/201309121300arcticshippingscreenversion_revised.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  590. ICC Alaska 2015: Alaskan Inuit food security conceptual framework: How to assess the Arctic From an Inuit perspective, Technical Report, Anchorage, in: https://iccalaska.org/wp-icc/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Food-Security-Full-Technical-Report.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  591. ICC 2017: 2016-2017 Annual Report, in: https://secureservercdn.net/104.238.71.250/hh3.0e7.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/english_final_2016-2017_annual_report.pdf; 14.4.2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  592. ICC 2018: Annual Report 2017-2018, in: https://secureservercdn.net/104.238.71.250/hh3.0e7.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/icc_2017-2018_annual_report_for_web.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  593. ICC 2019: 2018.19 Annual Report, in: https://secureservercdn.net/104.238.71.250/hh3.0e7.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/ICC_2018-2019-Annual-Report.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126
  594. ICC 2020: 2019.20 Annual Report, in: https://secureservercdn.net/104.238.71.250/hh3.0e7.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/ICC-2019-2020-Annual-Report.pdf; 14.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2022-1-126

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien