VALORizing Innovation

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Swiss Journal of Business Jahrgang 80 (2026), Heft 2
Open Access Vollzugriff

Swiss Journal of Business

Jahrgang 80 (2026), Heft 2

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
ISSN-Print
2944-3741

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 80 (2026), Heft 2

VALORizing Innovation

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2944-3741
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
Kapitelvorschau:

Die Messung von Innovation ist in bestehenden Modellen fragmentiert, was zu Unklarheiten hinsichtlich wirksamer Ansätze zur Bewertung von Innovationsleistung führt. Mithilfe der Klassifizierungsmethode fasst diese Studie vier etablierte Modelle zur Innovationsmessung zusammen, um das ganzheitliche VALOR Framework zu entwickeln, welches Values, Activities, Longevity, Output sowie Return on Innovation umfasst. Zur Operationalisierung des Frameworks werden 62 Indikatoren vorgestellt, mit denen die Leistung der Innovationskategorien gemessen werden können. Diese Forschung bietet einen umfassenden analytischen Rahmen, der sowohl traditionelle als auch zeitgemässe Innovationsaspekte umfasst. Die Ergebnisse ermöglichen es Innovationsmanagern und Vermögensverwaltern, die Innovationsleistung einzelner Unternehmen zu bewerten und zu benchmarken sowie ihre strategischen Entscheidungen zu unterstützen.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. References to articles that are included for indicator collection are marked with an asterisk (*).keep-with-next Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  2. Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  3. Amir*, E., Guan, Y., & Livne, G. (2006). The association of R&D and capital expenditures with subsequent earnings variability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(4), 1037–1074. https://doi.org/10.1506/3R3P-0W51-Q3X8-4640 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  4. Anagnostopoulou*, S. C., & Levis, M. (2008). R&D and performance persistence: Evidence from the United Kingdom. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2008.06.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  5. Anthropic. (2025). Claude.ai [Sonnet 4]. https://claude.ai Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  6. Arvanitis*, S., & Bolli, T. (2009). A comparison of firm-level innovation cooperation in five European countries. KOF Working Papers, 232. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  7. Arvanitis*, S., & Hollenstein, H. (2010). How do different motives for R&D investment in foreign locations affect domestic firm performance? An analysis based on Swiss panel micro data. KOF Working Papers, 258. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  8. Arvanitis*, S., & Stucki, T. (2014). The impact of venture capital on the persistence of innovation activities of start-ups. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 849–870. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  9. Arvanitis*, S., Lokshin, B., Mohnen, P., & Wörter, M. (2013). Impact of external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation: A comparative study based on Dutch and Swiss panel data. KOF Working Papers, 325. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  10. Arvanitis*, S., Lokshin, B., Mohnen, P., & Wörter, M. (2015). Impact of external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation: A comparative study based on Dutch and Swiss panel data. Review of Industrial Organization, 46(4), 359–382. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  11. Arvanitis*, S., Loukis, E. N., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2013). Are ICT, workplace organization and human capital relevant for innovation? A comparative study based on Swiss and Greek micro data. KOF Working Papers, 333. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  12. Arvanitis*, S., Wörter, M., & Seliger, F. (2016). Knowledge spillovers and their impact on innovation success: A new approach using patent backward citations. KOF Working Papers, 414. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  13. Backes-Gellner*, U., & Rupietta, C. (2017). Combining knowledge stock and knowledge flow to generate superior incremental innovation performance: Evidence from Swiss manufacturing. Swiss Leading House “Economics of Education” Working Paper, 89. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2904915 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  14. Bagherzadeh*, M., Markovic, S., Cheng, J., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2020). How does outside-in open innovation influence innovation performance? Analyzing the mediating roles of knowledge sharing and innovation strategy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 740–753. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  15. Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: an introduction to classification techniques. Sage Publications Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  16. Bei*, W., & Jin, C. (2010). The moderation of environmental dynamism between R&D outsourcing and firm innovation performance. In PICMET '10 – Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings – Technology Management for Global Economic Growth (pp. 1986–1991). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  17. Brown, M. G., & Svenson, R. A. (1998). Measuring R&D Productivity. Research Technology Management, 41(6), 30–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24131750 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  18. Burke, A., Okrent, A. & Hale, K. (2022). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221/u-s-and-global-research-and-development Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  19. CFA Institute. (n.d.). CFA Program Curriculum Glossary. Retrieved from https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/programs/cfa/curriculum/glossary#q=asset&sort=%40glossaryz32xterm%20ascending&numberOfResults=100 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  20. Chang*, M. H. (2023). Cascading innovation: R&D team design and performance implications of mobility. Strategic Management Journal, 44(5), 1218–1253. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  21. Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., & Voss, C. A. (1996). Development of a technical innovation audit. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(2), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(95)00109-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  22. Cordero, R. (1990). The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: An overview. Research Policy, 19(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90048-B Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  23. Crescenzi*, R., & Gagliardi, L. (2018). The innovative performance of firms in heterogeneous environments: The interplay between external knowledge and internal absorptive capacities. Research Policy, 47(4), 782–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  24. Davila, T., Epstein, M. J., & Shelton, R. (2006). Making innovation work: How to manage it, measure it, and profit from it. Wharton School Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  25. De la Gala-Velásquez*, B., Hurtado-Palomino, A., & Arredondo-Salas, A. Y. (2023). Organisational flexibility and innovation performance: The moderating role of management support. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(2), 219–234. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  26. Dempere, J., Qamar, M., Allam, H., & Malik, S. (2023). The Impact of Innovation on Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment, and Self-Employment: A Global Perspective. Economies, 11(7), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11070182 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  27. Desyllas*, P., & Hughes, A. (2009). The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers: An analysis of the innovation characteristics of their targets. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(6), 1089–1111. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  28. Donelson*, D. C., & Resutek, R. J. (2012). The effect of R&D on future returns and earnings forecasts. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(4), 848–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-012-9193-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  29. Duan*, Y., Wang, W., & Zhou, W. (2020). The multiple mediation effect of absorptive capacity on the organizational slack and innovation performance of high-tech manufacturing firms: Evidence from Chinese firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107754 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  30. European Space Agency (ESA). (n.d.). Space Economy. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from https://www.esa.int/About_Us/Business_with_ESA/Global_Space_Economic_Forum/Space_Economy Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  31. Eurostat. (2020). Which EU countries had the highest GDP in 2019? Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20200508-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  32. Foray, D. (2023, September). The Great Debate (Part 1): Innovatization of the space industry – a macro-perspective. In Commercial Space Days, Lucerne. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  33. Foster, R. N., Linden, L. H., Whiteley, R. L., & Kantrow, A. M. (1985). IMPROVING THE RETURN ON R&D—I. Research Management, 28(1), 12–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24120647 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  34. Ganbaatar, B., Myagmar, K., & Douglas, E. J. (2024). Using a complex measure of product innovativeness to explain abnormal financial returns. International Journal of Innovation Science, 16(1), 138–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2022-0206 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  35. Gao*, Y., Zhang, S., & Liu, X. (2023). Too much of a good thing: The dual effect of R&D subsidy on firms' exploratory innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(4), 1639–1651. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  36. Gregor, S. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  37. Guo*, Y., & Zheng, G. (2023). Recombinant capabilities, R&D collaboration, and innovation performance of emerging market firms in high-technology industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(7), 2431–2446. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  38. Hagedoorn*, J., Lokshin, B., & Malo, S. (2018). Alliances and the innovation performance of corporate and public research spin-off firms. Small Business Economics, 50(4), 763–781. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  39. Hagedoorn*, J., Lokshin, B., & Zobel, A.-K. (2018). Partner type diversity in alliance portfolios: Multiple dimensions, boundary conditions and firm innovation performance. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 809–836. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  40. Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P.-H., & Li, D. (2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.09.011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  41. Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P.-H., & Li, D. (2018). Innovative originality, profitability, and stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(7), 2553–2605. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx101 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  42. Hottenrott*, H., & Lopes Bento, C. (2014). R&D partnerships and innovation performance: Can there be too much of a good thing? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 881–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12122 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  43. Jian*, Z., Liu, R., & Ma, Q. (2009). The relationships among relational embeddedness, structural embeddedness and innovation performance: An empirical study of South China. In Proceedings – International Conference on Management and Service Science, MASS 2009 (Article 5301982). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  44. Keil*, T., Maula, M., Schildt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2008). The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 895–907. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  45. Kerssens-van Drongelen, I. C., & Cooke, A. (1997). Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and development processes. R & D Management, 27(4), 345–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9310.00070 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  46. Kim*, J. M., Yang, I., Yang, T., & Koveos, P. (2021). The impact of R&D intensity, financial constraints, and dividend payout policy on firm value. Finance Research Letters, 43, 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.101964 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  47. Kleine*, M. (2020). Subsidized R&D collaboration: The causal effect of innovation vouchers on innovation performance. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 20–043. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631207 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  48. Lachenmaier, S., & Rottmann, H. (2011). Effects of innovation on employment: A dynamic panel analysis. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.05.004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  49. Lee, M., Son, B., & Lee, H. (1996). Measuring R&D Effectiveness in Korean Companies. Research-Technology Management, 39(2), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1996.11674317 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  50. Leung*, T. Y., & Sharma, P. (2021). Differences in the impact of R&D intensity and R&D internationalization on firm performance: Mediating role of innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 131, 81–91. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  51. Li*, D. (2011). Financial constraints, R&D investment, and stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(9), 2974–3007. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr031 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  52. Li*, W.-B., Yu, B., & Wu, W.-W. (2014). The effect of alliance structure on knowledge innovation performance in R&D alliance: Organizational learning as a mediator. In International Conference on Management Science and Engineering – Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 847–856). IEEE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  53. Liu*, M.-S. (2013). Effect of highly-innovative work practices and employee knowledge innovation on organizational innovation performance: A multilevel perspective. In Academy of Management 2013 Annual Meeting Proceedings (pp. 546–551). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  54. Lungeanu*, R., Stern, I., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). When do firms change technology-sourcing vehicles? The role of poor innovative performance and financial slack. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 855–869. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  55. Luo*, T., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Multi-network embeddedness and innovation performance of R&D employees. Scientometrics, 126(9), 8091–8107. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  56. McShane*, W., & Sevilir, M. (2023). R&D tax credits and the acquisition of startups. Leibniz Institute for Economic Research Halle (IWH). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4363269 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  57. Möller, K., Schultze, W., & Steinmann, J. (2016). Innovationscontrolling. In C. P. Hoffmann, S. Lennerts, C. Schmitz, W. Stölzle, & F. Uebernickel (Eds.), Business Innovation: Das St. Galler Modell (1st ed. 2016, pp. 141–160). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07167-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  58. Muller, A., Välikangas, L., & Merlyn, P. (2005). Metrics for innovation: Guidelines for developing a customized suite of innovation metrics. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 33(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2005.27017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  59. Müller-Stewens, B., Möller, K. Performance in new product development: a comprehensive framework, current trends, and research directions. J Manag Control 28, 157–201 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-016-0243-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  60. OHB SE. (2023a). Annual Report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ohb.de/en/investor-relations/publications/financial-reports Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  61. OHB SE. (2023b). Corporate report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ohb.de/en/investor-relations/publications/corporate-reports Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  62. OHB SE. (2023c). Sustainability Report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ohb.de/en/investor-relations/publications/sustainability-reports Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  63. Ojanen, V. & Vuola, O. (2006). ‘Coping with the multiple dimensions of R&D performance analysis’, Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 33, Nos. 2/3, pp. 279–290. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  64. Oke*, A., Prajogo, D., Idiagbon-Oke, M., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2022). Linking environmental forces, absorptive capacity, information sharing and innovation performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(7), 1738–1755. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  65. Ormans, L. (2016, September 12). 50 Journals used in FT Research Rank. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/3405a512-5cbb-11e1-8f1f-00144feabdc0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  66. Pandit*, S., Wasley, C. E., & Zach, T. (2011). The Effect of Research and Development (R&D) Inputs and Outputs on the Relation between the Uncertainty of Future Operating Performance and R&D Expenditures. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11400583 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  67. PitchBook. (n.d.-a). PitchBook Profile of OHB SE. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from https://my.pitchbook.com/profile/56640-88/company/profile?exchangeId=ETR&exchangeSymbol=OHB Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  68. PitchBook. (n.d.-b). PitchBook Profile of OHB Venture Capital. Retrieved November 11, 2023, from https://my.pitchbook.com/profile/233459-38/investor/profile Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  69. PitchBook. (n.d.-c). PitchBook Profile of Thales Group. Retrieved November 11, 2023, from https://my.pitchbook.com/profile/11536-66/company/profile Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  70. PitchBook. (n.d.-d). PitchBook Profile of Thales Corporate Ventures. Retrieved from https://my.pitchbook.com/profile/11612-08/investor/profile#lead-partners Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  71. Prajogo*, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2006). The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega, 34(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  72. Refinitiv Eikon. (n.d.-a). LSEG Co. Fundamentals for OHBG.DE [2022 data]. Retrieved 03.02.2024, from https://emea1-apps.platform.refinitiv.com/web/Apps/Corp?s=OHBG.DE&st=RIC&app=true#/Apps/CFundamentals?view=FinancialSummary Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  73. Refinitiv Eikon. (n.d.-b). LSEG Co. Fundamentals for TCFP.PA [2022 data]. Retrieved 03.02.2024, from https://emea1-apps.platform.refinitiv.com/web/Apps/Corp?s=TCFP.PA&st=RIC&app=true#/Apps/CFundamentals?view=FinancialSummary Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  74. Schenker-Wicki*, A., & Beck, M. (2014). Cooperating with external partners: The importance of diversity for innovation performance. European Journal of International Management, 8(5), 548–569. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  75. Schumann Jr., P. A., Ransley, D. L., & Prestwood, D. C. L. (1995). Measuring R&D Performance. Research-Technology Management, 38(3), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1995.11674268 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  76. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credits, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  77. Scopus. (n.d.). Sources. Retrieved 09.12.2023. https://www.scopus.com/sources Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  78. Singhal, C., Mahto, R. V., & Kraus, S. (2022). Technological Innovation, Firm Performance, and Institutional Context: A Meta-Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), 2976–2986. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3021378 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  79. Sommer*, D., & Bhandari, K. R. (2022). Internationalization of R&D and innovation performance in the pharma industry. Journal of International Management, 28(3), 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  80. Sougiannis*, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 44–68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248271 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  81. Spencer*, J. W. (2003). Firms' knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: Empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 217–233. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  82. Spescha*, A., & Wörter, M. (2016). Research and development as an initiator of fixed capital investment. KOF Working Papers, 402. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  83. Sung*, Y. S., & Choi, J. N. (2014). Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development investments on learning and innovation in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 393–412. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  84. Szambelan*, S. M., & Jiang, Y. D. (2020). Effectual control orientation and innovation performance: Clarifying implications in the corporate context. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 865–882. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  85. Thales Group. (2023a). Integrated Report Corporate Responsibility 2022–2023. Retrieved from https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/global/corporate-responsibility/key-documents Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  86. Thales Group. (2023b). Consolidated Financial Statements 2022. Retrieved from https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/group/investors/press_release/thales-reports-its-2022-full-year-results Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  87. Tojeiro-Rivero*, D., & Moreno, R. (2019). Technological cooperation, R&D outsourcing, and innovation performance at the firm level: The role of the regional context. Research Policy, 48(7), 1789–1808. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  88. Vereinigung für Hochschullehrerinnen und Hochschullehrer der Betriebswirtschaft e.V. [VHB] (n.d.). Liste der Fachzeitschriften in VHB-JOURQUAL3. Retrieved 09.12.2023, from https://vhbonline.org/vhb4you/vhb-jourqual/vhb-jourqual-3/gesamtliste Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  89. Walcher, F., & Wöhrl, U. (2018). Measuring Innovation Performance. In G. Friedl, H. Kayser, P. Schäfer, C. Scheubel, P. Bierschneider, H. Gierse, R. Hermann, M. Wokusch, F. Walcher, & U. Wöhrl (Eds.), Valuing Corporate Innovation (pp. 71–110). In Management for Professionals. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64864-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  90. Wang*, S., Wu, K., & Lai, S. (2021). Acquisition for innovations? M&A intensity and intra-firm R&D reallocations. Journal of Business Research, 133, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.061 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  91. Wang*, X., Han, X., & Li, H. (2023). The impact of innovation openness on innovation performance of manufacturing corporates: Moderating effect based on knowledge reorganization. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103917 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  92. Wang*, Z., & Qi, Z. (2021). Analysis of the influences of ICTs on enterprise innovation performance in China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(2), 474–478. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  93. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023. https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2023/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  94. Wörter*, M. (2007). Industry diversity and its impact on the innovation performance of firms: An empirical analysis based on firm-level panel data. KOF Working Papers, 165. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  95. Wörter*, M. (2009). Technology diversification, product innovations, and technology transfer. KOF Working Papers, 221. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  96. Wörter*, M., & Bolli, T. (2013). Technological diversification and innovation performance. KOF Working Papers, 336. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  97. Wörter*, M., Renold, U., & Bolli, T. (2015). Vertical educational diversity and innovation performance. KOF Working Papers, 395. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  98. Yin*, X., Qi, L., Ji, J., & Zhou, J. (2023). How does innovation spirit affect R&D investment and innovation performance? The moderating role of business environment. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), 1–12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  99. Zhang*, J., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Hoenig, S. (2009). Product development strategy, product innovation performance, and the mediating role of knowledge utilization: Evidence from subsidiaries in China. Journal of International Marketing, 17(2), 42–58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  100. Zhang*, S., Li, J., & Li, N. (2022). Partner technological heterogeneity and innovation performance of R&D alliances. R&D Management, 52(1), 3–21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  101. Zhang*, Z., Wu, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Financial fragility, R&D investment, and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 407, 137188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137188 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142
  102. Ziemnowicz, C. (2013). Joseph A. Schumpeter and Innovation. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_476 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2026-2-142

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien