RemanLab – Lernfabrik für Remanufacturing/RemanLab – Learning Factory for Remanufacturing

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: wt Werkstattstechnik online Jahrgang 115 (2025), Heft 04
Open Access Vollzugriff

wt Werkstattstechnik online

Jahrgang 115 (2025), Heft 04

Autor:innen:
Verlag
VDI fachmedien, Düsseldorf
Copyrightjahr
2025
ISSN-Online
1436-4980
ISSN-Print
1436-4980

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 115 (2025), Heft 04

RemanLab – Lernfabrik für Remanufacturing/RemanLab – Learning Factory for Remanufacturing

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
1436-4980
ISSN-Online
1436-4980
Kapitelvorschau:

Remanufacturing gewinnt im Kontext von Ressourcenknappheit und Nachhaltigkeit weiter an Bedeutung. Forschung und Kompetenzentwicklung am realen Objekt sind dabei zentral, um die spezifischen Herausforderungen zu bewältigen. Im RemanLab wird das etablierte Konzept der Lernfabrik auf das Remanufacturing übertragen und die Prozesskette praxisnah vermittelt. Dies ermöglicht Wissenstransfer, Produktbewertungen und die Entwicklung effizienter Prozessketten, insbesondere mittels digitaler Technologien.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. [1] Schuh, G.; Schmidt, C. (Hrsg.): Produktionsmanagement: Handbuch Produktion und Management 5. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag 2014. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/978–3–642–54288–6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  2. [2] Kara, S.; Hauschild, M.; Sutherland, J. et al.: Closed-loop systems to circular economy: A pathway to environmental sustainability? CIRP Annals 71 (2022) 2, pp. 505–528 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  3. [3] Cerdas, F.; Kurle, D.; Andrew, S. et al.: Defining Circulation Factories – A Pathway towards Factories of the Future. Procedia CIRP 29 (2015), pp. 627–632 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  4. [4] DIN SPEC 91345: Referenzarchitekturmodell Industrie 4.0 (RAMI4.0) Ausgabe April 2016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  5. [5] Industry IoT Consortium: The Industrial Internet Reference Architecture. Stand: 2022. Internet: www.iiconsortium.org/iira/. Zugriff am 14.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  6. [6] ISO/IEC 30141: Internet of things (IoT) – Reference architecture. Ausgabe August 2024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  7. [7] Heinz, C.; Krämer, J.; Riemenschneider, T. et al.: Auf dem Weg zur allwissenden Fabrik – Vertikale Integration auf Basis kontinuierlicher Datenverarbeitung. Workshop ‚Die allwissende Fabrik – Informatik in der Produktion‘, INFORMATIK 2007, Informatik trifft Logistik, Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), P-110, 2007, S. 339–344 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  8. [8] Theorin, A.; Bengtsson, K.; Provost, J. et al.: An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research 55 (2017) 5, pp. 1297–1311 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  9. [9] Thiede, S.; Marc-André, F.; Thiede, B. et al.: Integrative simulation of information flows in manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 81 (2019), pp. 647–652 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  10. [10] Vater, J.; Harscheidt, L.; Knoll, A.: A Reference Architecture Based on Edge and Cloud Computing for Smart Manufacturing. 2019 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN), Valencia, Spain, 2019, pp. 1–7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  11. [11] Oluyisola, O. E.; Bhalla, S.; Sgarbossa, F. et al.: Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: a methodology and case study. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 33 (2022) 1, pp. 311–332 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  12. [12] Zietsch, J.: Planning of Edge Computing for Factories. Dissertation, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 2023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  13. [13] Reis, J.; Housley, M.: Fundamentals of Data Engineering: Plan and Build Robust Data Systems. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  14. [14] Thiede, S.; Juraschek, M.; Herrmann, C.: Implementing Cyber-physical Production Systems in Learning Factories. Procedia CIRP 54 (2016), pp. 7–12 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  15. [15] Blömeke, S.; Mennenga, M.; Herrmann, C. et al.: Recycling 4.0: An Integrated Approach Towards an Advanced Circular Economy. ICT4S2020: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, 2020, pp. 66–76 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  16. [16] Oks, S. J.; Fritzsche, A.; Möslein, K. M.: An Application Map for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems. In: Jeschke, S.; Brecher, C.; Song, H. et al. (Hrsg.): Industrial Internet of Things. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2017, S. 21–46 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  17. [17] Seitz, M.: Speicherprogrammierbare Steuerungen im Industrial IoT: Objektorientierter System- und Programmentwurf, Motion Control, Sicherheit, Digital Engineering. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  18. [18] Munro, K.; Papp, S.; Toth, Z. et al.: Handbuch Data Science und KI: Mit Machine Learning und Datenanalyse Wert aus Daten generieren. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  19. [19] Beims, M.; Bischof, C.; Hengstberger, W.: Handbuch IT-System- und Plattformmanagement. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  20. [20] Riggert, W.; Lübben, R.: Rechnernetze: ein einführendes Lehrbuch. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  21. [21] ISO/IEC 7498–1: Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Basic reference model: The basic model. Ausgabe November 1994 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  22. [22] IPCOMM GmbH: Standardprotokolle. Stand: 2025. Internet: www.ipcomm.de/protocols_de.html. Zugriff am 14.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  23. [23] Bockholt, H.; Indrikova, M.; Netz, A. et al.: The interaction of consecutive process steps in the manufacturing of lithium-ion battery electrodes with regard to structural and electrochemical properties. Journal of Power Sources 325 (2016), pp. 140–151 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-5
  24. [1] Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Towards the Circular Economy Volume 1. Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Stand: 2013. Internet: emf.thirdlight.com/file/24/xTyQj3oxiYNMO1xTFs9xT5LF3C/Towards%20the%20circular%20economy%20Vol%201%3A%20an%20economic%20and%20business%20rationale%20for%20an%20accelerated%20transition.pdf. Zugriff am 28.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  25. [2] European Commission: Commission Staff Working Document – Impact Assessment. Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC. Stand: 2022. Internet: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022–03/SWD_2022_82_1_EN_impact_assessment_part3_v2.pdf. Zugriff am 28.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  26. [3] DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung: DIN SPEC 91472:2023–06 Remanufacturing (Reman) – Qualitätsklassifizierung für zirkuläre Prozesse. Berlin: Beuth Verlag 2023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  27. [4] Westkämper, E.; Warnecke, H.-J.: Einführung in die Fertigungstechnik. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag 2010 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  28. [5] VDI Verein Deutscher Ingenieure: VDI 2243:2002–07: Recyclingorientierte Produktentwicklung. Berlin: Beuth Verlag 2002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  29. [6] Lange, U.: Ressourceneffizienz durch Remanufacturing – Industrielle Aufarbeitung von Altteilen. Berlin: VDI ZRE Kurzanalyse 2017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  30. [7] Köhler, D. C. F.: Regenerative Supply Chains. Regenerative Wertschöpfungsketten. Aachen: Shaker Verlag 2011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  31. [8] Koop, C.; Grosse Erdmann, J.; Koller, J. et al.: Circular Business Models for Remanufacturing in the Electric Bicycle Industry. Frontiers in Sustainability 2 (2021), doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.785036 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  32. [9] Parker, D.; Riley, K.; Robinson, S. et al.: Remanufacturing Market Study. Stand: 2015. Internet: www.remanufacturing.eu/assets/pdfs/remanufacturing-market-study.pdf. Zugriff am 28.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  33. [10] Roland Berger; CLEPA European Association of Automotive Suppliers: The Electrification of Light Vehicles. Boon or bane for the European aftermarket? Stand: 2022. Internet: https://content.rolandberger.com/hubfs/07_presse/22_2088_COP_Automotive_Aftermarket_CLEPA_online_DS_(2).pdf. Zugriff am 28.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  34. [11] Guide, V. R.: Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management 18 (2000) 4, pp. 467–483 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  35. [12] Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J.; Sundin, E.; Poksinska, B.: Remanufacturing challenges and possible lean improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production 172 (2018), pp. 3225–3236 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  36. [13] Miehe, R.; Gross, E.; Ackermann, T. et al.: Learning factories for biointelligent production – design aspects and required competencies. SSRN Electronic Journal (2023). Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Learning Factories (CLF 2023), dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4458036 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  37. [14] Ackermann, T.; Miehe, R.; Reimann, P. et al.: A cross-disciplinary training concept for future technologists in the dawn of biointelligent production systems. SSRN Electronic Journal (2023). Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Learning Factories (CLF 2023), dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4458051 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  38. [15] Abele, E.; Metternich, J.; Tisch, M. et al.: Learning Factories. Featuring New Concepts, Guidelines, Worldwide Best-Practice Examples. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  39. [16] Tisch, M.; Ranz, F.; Abele, E. et al.: Learning Factory Morphology – Study Of Form And Structure Of An Innovative Learning Approach In The Manufacturing Domain. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Special Issue (2015), pp- 356–363 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  40. [17] Koller, J.; Grosse Erdmann, J.; Herold, M. et al.: RemanLab – Conceptualization and Realization of a Learning Factory for Remanufacturing. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Learning Factories (CLF 2023), dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4469183 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  41. [18] ZIV – Die Fahrradindustrie (Hrsg.): Marktdaten Fahrräder und E-Bikes für 2023. In Kooperation mit dem VSF – Verbund Service und Fahrrad. Stand: 2024. Internet: www.mtb-news.de/news/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/0fcb98eaa8cc63ccf908048a4d57a8cbb3773020.pdf. Zugriff am 28.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  42. [19] Schlesinger, L.; Koller, J.; Oechsle, O. et al.: Remanufacturing of E-mobility Components – Five-Step Implementation Strategy to increase Sustainability within Circular Economy. 2021 11th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC), Erlangen, Germany, 2021, pp. 1–8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  43. [20] Koller, J.: E-Bike Remanufacturing: potential & technical feasibility. In: Weiland, F. (Hrsg.): Remanufacturing Components of Electric Vehicles. Selbstverlag: Köln 2022, pp. 69–88, Internet: www.fjwconsulting.com/. Zugriff am 28.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  44. [21] Brose Antriebstechnik GmbH & Co. KG: Remanufacturing-Antriebe von Brose jetzt bei RA-CO erhältlich. Stand: 2024. Internet: www.brose-ebike.com/de-de/presse/reman-ra-co/. Zugriff am 28.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  45. [22] Steinhilper, R.: Produktrecycling. Vielfachnutzen durch Mehrfachnutzung. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag 1999 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  46. [23] Errington, M.; Childe, S. J.: A business process model of inspection in remanufacturing. Journal of Remanufacturing 3 (2013) 7, doi.org/10.1186/2210–4690–3–7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  47. [24] Erdmann, J. G.; Koller, J.; Brimaire, J. et al.: Assessment of the Disassemblability of Electric Bicycle Motors for Remanufacturing. Journal of Remanufacturing 13 (2023) 2, pp. 137–159 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  48. [25] Sprenger, K.; Klein, J.-F.; Wurster, M. et al.: Industrie 4.0 im Remanufacturing. Industrie 4.0 Management 2021 (2021) 4, pp. 37–40 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  49. [26] Yang, S.; M. R., A. R.; Kaminski, J. et al.: Opportunities for Industry 4.0 to Support Remanufacturing. Applied Sciences 8 (2018) 7, #1177 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  50. [27] Ahmeti, E.; Erdmann, J. G.; Herold, M. et al.: Demontage, Automation und KI: Das Remanufacturing von Elektrokleingeräten. atp magazin (2024) 8, pp. 20–23 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  51. [28] Kärcher, S.; Grabi, F.; Maier, J. et al.: Automatisierte Montageanalyse und -ablaufplanung. wt Werkstattstechnik online 110 (2020) 10, S. 722–727. Internet: www.werkstattstechnik.de. Düsseldorf: VDI Fachmedien Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-14
  52. [1] Armstrong McKay, D. I.; Staal, A.; Abrams, J. F. et al.: Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377 (2022) 6611, doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  53. [2] International Energy Agency: Cars and Vans. . Internet: www.iea.org/energy-system/transport/cars-and-vans#tracking. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  54. [3] European Parliament: EU ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars from 2035 explained. Internet: www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20221019STO44572/eu-ban-on-sale-of-new-petrol-and-diesel-cars-from-2035-explained. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  55. [4] International Energy Agency: Comparative life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of a mid-size BEV and ICE vehicle. Stand: 2021. Internet: www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/comparative-life-cycle-greenhouse-gas-emissions-of-a-mid-size-bev-and-ice-vehicle. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  56. [5] Ginster, R.; Blömeke, S.; Popien, J.-L. et al.: Circular battery production in the EU: Insights from integrating life cycle assessment into system dynamics modeling on recycled content and environmental impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology 28 (2024) 5, pp. 1165–1182 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  57. [6] European Commission: Study on the critical raw materials for the EU 2023. Final report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Stand: 2023. Internet: single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/publications/study-critical-raw-materials-eu-2023-final-report_en. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  58. [7] European Union: Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 concerning batteries and waste batteries, amending Directive 2008/98/EC and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Directive 2006/66/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Stand: 2023. Internet: eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj/eng. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  59. [8] Choux, M.; Pripp, S. W.; Kvalnes, F. et al.: To shred or to disassemble – A techno-economic assessment of automated disassembly vs. shredding in lithium-ion battery module recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 203 (2024), #107430 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  60. [9] Thompson, D. L.; Hyde, C.; Hartley, J. M. et al.: To shred or not to shred: A comparative techno-economic assessment of lithium ion battery hydrometallurgical recycling retaining value and improving circularity in LIB supply chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 175 (2021), #105741 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  61. [10] Thompson, D. L.; Hartley, J. M.; Lambert, S. M. et al.: The importance of design in lithium ion battery recycling – a critical review. Green Chemistry 22 (2020) 22, pp. 7585–7603 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  62. [11] Rettenmeier, M.; Eckstein, S.; Hackenbeck, C. et al.: Model-driven evaluation of exoskeletons for efficient traction battery dismantling. Procedia CIRP 130 (2024), pp. 1850–1855 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  63. [12] Rettenmeier, M.; Möller, M.; Sauer, A.: Disassembly technologies of end-of-life automotive battery packs as the cornerstone for a circular battery value chain: A process-oriented analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 209 (2024), #107786 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  64. [13] Harper, G.; Sommerville, R.; Kendrick, E. et al.: Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 575 (2019) 7781, pp. 75–86 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  65. [14] Wu, X.; Ma, J.; Wang, J. et al.: Progress, Key Issues, and Future Prospects for Li-Ion Battery Recycling. Global Challenges 6 (2022) 12, #2200067 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  66. [15] Gerlitz, E.; Greifenstein, M.; Hofmann, J. et al.: Analysis of the Variety of Lithium-Ion Battery Modules and the Challenges for an Agile Automated Disassembly System. Procedia CIRP 96 (2021), pp. 175–180 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  67. [16] Schäfer, J.; Singer, R.; Hofmann, J. et al.: Challenges and Solutions of Automated Disassembly and Condition-Based Remanufacturing of Lithium-Ion Battery Modules for a Circular Economy. Procedia Manufacturing 43 (2020), pp. 614–619 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  68. [17] Klohs, D.; Offermanns, C.; Heimes, H. et al.: Automated Battery Disassembly—Examination of the Product- and Process-Related Challenges for Automotive Traction Batteries. Recycling 8 (2023) 6, #89 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  69. [18] Miloradović, B.; Bigorra, E. M.; Nolte, T. et al.: Challenges in the Automated Disassembly Process of Electric Vehicle Battery Packs. IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA 2023, Sinaia,/Romania, 2023, pp. 1–4, doi.org/10.1109/ETFA54631.2023.10275389 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  70. [19] Hathaway, J.; Contreras, C. A.; Asif, M. E. et al.: Technoeconomic Assessment of Electric Vehicle Battery Disassembly-Challenges and Opportunities From a Robotics Perspective. IEEE Access 13 (2025), pp. 716–733 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  71. [20] Zhou, L.; Garg, A.; Zheng, J. et al.: Battery pack recycling challenges for the year 2030: Recommended solutions based on intelligent robotics for safe and efficient disassembly, residual energy detection, and secondary utilization. Energy Storage 3 (2021) 3, e190 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  72. [21] Rehman, S.; Al-Greer, M.; Burn, A. S. et al.: High-Volume Battery Recycling: Technical Review of Challenges and Future Directions. Batteries 11 (2025) 3, #94 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  73. [22] Windisch-Kern, S.; Gerold, E.; Nigl, T. et al.: Recycling chains for lithium-ion batteries: A critical examination of current challenges, opportunities and process dependencies. Waste Management 138 (2022), pp. 125–139 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  74. [23] Fan, E.; Li, L.; Wang, Z. et al.: Sustainable Recycling Technology for Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond: Challenges and Future Prospects. Chemical Reviews 120 (2020) 14, pp. 7020–7063 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  75. [24] Elwert, T.; Goldmann, D.; Römer, F. et al.: Current Developments and Challenges in the Recycling of Key Components of (Hybrid) Electric Vehicles. Recycling 1 (2016) 1, pp. 25–60 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  76. [25] Yu, X.; Li, W.; Gupta, V. et al.: Current Challenges in Efficient Lithium-Ion Batteries‘ Recycling: A Perspective. Global Challenges 6 (2022) 12, #2200099 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  77. [26] Elwert, T.; Römer, F.; Schneider, K. et al.: Recycling of Batteries from Electric Vehicles. In: Pistoia, G.; Liaw, B. Y. (eds.): Behaviour of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Battery health, performance, safety, and cost. Cham: Springer 2018, pp. 289–321 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  78. [27] Lander, L.; Tagnon, C.; Nguyen-Tien, V. et al.: Breaking it down: A techno-economic assessment of the impact of battery pack design on disassembly costs. Applied Energy 331 (2023), #120437 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  79. [28] Glöser-Chahoud, S.; Huster, S.; Rosenberg, S. et al.: Industrial disassembling as a key enabler of circular economy solutions for obsolete electric vehicle battery systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 174 (2021), #105735 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  80. [29] Pražanová, A.; Míka, M. H.; Knap, V.: Lithium-ion battery module-to-cell: disassembly and material analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2382 (2022) 1, #012002, doi.org/10.1088/1742–6596/2382/1/012002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  81. [30] Jin, T.; Singer, G.; Liang, K. et al.: Structural batteries: Advances, challenges and perspectives. Materials Today 62 (2023), pp. 151–167 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  82. [31] Beghi, M.; Braghin, F.; Roveda, L.: Enhancing Disassembly Practices for Electric Vehicle Battery Packs: A Narrative Comprehensive Review. designs 7 (2023) 5, #109, doi.org/10.3390/designs7050109 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  83. [32] Kampker, A.; Heimes, H. H.; Ordung, M. et al.: Evaluation Of A Remanufacturing For Lithium Ion Batteries From Electric Cars. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering 3 (2016), pp. 1929–1935 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  84. [33] Wegener, K.; Andrew, S.; Raatz, A. et al.: Disassembly of Electric Vehicle Batteries Using the Example of the Audi Q5 Hybrid System. TS 2014 – CIRP Conference on Assembly Systems and Tech Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems 23 (2014), pp. 155–160 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  85. [34] Rosenberg, S.; Huster, S.; Baazouzi, S. et al.: Field Study and Multimethod Analysis of an EV Battery System Disassembly. Energies 15 (2022) 15, #5324 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  86. [35] Meng, K.; Xu, G.; Peng, X. et al.: Intelligent disassembly of electric-vehicle batteries: a forward-looking overview. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 182 (2022), #106207 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  87. [36] Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z. et al.: Design and Implementation of a Multifunctional Screw Disassembly Workstation. 16th International Conference, ICIRA 2023, Proceedings, Part VIII 14274 LNAI (2023), pp. 506–519 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  88. [37] Rettenmeier, M.; Sauer, A.; Möller, M.: Laser-based battery pack disassembly: a compact benchmark analysis for separation technologies. Procedia CIRP 122 (2024), pp. 181–186 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  89. [38] Rettenmeier, M.; Schilling, N. J.; Möller, M. et al.: Laser-based disassembly of end-of-life automotive traction batteries: A systematic patent analysis. World Patent Information 79 (2024), #102322 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  90. [39] Zorn, M.; Ionescu, C.; Klohs, D. et al.: An Approach for Automated Disassembly of Lithium-Ion Battery Packs and High-Quality Recycling Using Computer Vision, Labeling, and Material Characterization. Recycling 7 (2022) 4, #48 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  91. [40] Baazouzi, S.; Rist, F. P.; Weeber, M. et al.: Optimization of Disassembly Strategies for Electric Vehicle Batteries. Batteries 7 (2021) 4, #74 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  92. [41] Ali, H.; Khan, H. A.; Pecht, M.: Preprocessing of spent lithium-ion batteries for recycling: Need, methods, and trends. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 168 (2022), #112809 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  93. [42] Wang, X.-T.; Gu, Z.-Y.; Ang, E. H. et al.: Prospects for managing end‐of‐life lithium‐ion batteries: Present and future. Interdisciplinary Materials 1 (2022) 3, pp. 417–433 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  94. [43] Zang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang C. et al.: Robotic disassembly of electric vehicle batteries: an overview. 27th International Conference on Automation and Computing: Smart Systems and Manufacturing (ICAC) 2022, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2022, pp. 1–6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  95. [44] Yang, J.; Gu, F.; Guo, J.: Environmental feasibility of secondary use of electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries in communication base stations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 156 (2020), #104713 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  96. [45] Tan, W. J.; Chin, C. M. M.; Garg, A. et al.: A hybrid disassembly framework for disassembly of electric vehicle batteries. International Journal of Energy Research 45 (2021) 5, pp. 8073–8082 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  97. [46] Gerbers, R.; Wegener, K.; Dietrich, F. et al.: Safe, Flexible and Productive Human-Robot-Collaboration for Disassembly of Lithium-Ion Batteries. In: Kwade, A.; Diekmann, J. (eds.): Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2018, pp. 99–126 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  98. [47] Rettenmeier, M.; Petrik, D.; Möller, M. et al.: A modeling framework and benchmark for end-of-life automotive traction battery pack forecasting. Journal Of Cleaner Production 491 (2025), #144752 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  99. [48] Harper, G.; Kendrick, E.; Anderson, P. et al.: Roadmap for a sustainable circular economy in lithium-ion and future battery technologies. Journal of Physics: Energy 5 (2023) 2, #021501 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  100. [49] Borchardt, I.; Finkbeiner, S.: Approach for a Systematic Assessment of Electrical Risks During Disassembly of Traction Batteries. 10th Annual World Conference of the Society for Industrial and Systems Engineering (2021), pp. 26–32 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-21
  101. [1] Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz (BMUV): Nationale Kreislaufwirtschaftsstrategie. Stand: 2024. Internet: https://www.bmuv.de/download/nationale-kreislaufwirtschaftsstrategie-nkws. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  102. [2] European Commission: Circular economy action plan. The EU’s new circular action plan paves the way for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Internet: environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_en. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  103. [3] Die Bundesregierung: Klimaschutzprogramm 2023. Mit großen Schritten zur Klimaneutralität. Stand: 04.10.2023. Internet: www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/klimaschutzprogramm-2023–2226992. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  104. [4] Fraunhofer-Institut für Produktionsanlagen und Konstruktionstechnik: Kreislaufwirtschaft. Stand: 2025. Internet: www.ipk.fraunhofer.de/de/kompetenzen-und-loesungen/industrietrends/kreislaufwirtschaft.html. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  105. [5] Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M.: Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127 (2017), pp. 221–232 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  106. [6] Potting, J.; Worrell, E.; Hekkert, M. P.: Circular Economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain, The Hague: PBL Netherlands Assessment Agency 2017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  107. [7] Europäische Investitionsbank: Kreislaufwirtschaft – Überblick 2024. Internet: www.eib.org/attachments/lucalli/20240104_circular_economy_overview_2024_de.pdf. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  108. [8] Wiechen, J.; Denter, L.; Wolf, S.: Kreislaufwirtschaft für eine klimaneutrale Industrie. Positionspaper Germanwatch e.V.. Internet: www.germanwatch.org/sites/default/files/germanwatch_kreislaufwirtschaft_fuer_eine_klimaneutrale_industrie_2024_0.pdf. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  109. [9] Agora Industrie, Systemiq: Resilienter Klimaschutz durch eine zirkuläre Wirtschaft. Perspektiven und Potenziale für energieintensive Grundstoffindustrien. Studie. Stand: 2023. Internet: www.agora-industrie.de/fileadmin/Projekte/2022/2022–11_IND_Kreislaufwirtschaft/A-EW_309_Kreislaufwirtschaft_WEB.pdf. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  110. [10] European Commission: Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation. Stand: 04.02.2025. Internet: commission.europa.eu/energy-climate-change-environment/standards-tools-and-labels/products-labelling-rules-and-requirements/ecodesign-sustainable-products-regulation_en. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  111. [11] Europäisches Parlament und Rat: VERORDNUNG (EU) 2024/1781 DES EUROPÄISCHEN PARLAMENTS UND DES RATES vom 13. Juni 2024 zur Schaffung eines Rahmens für die Festlegung von Ökodesign-Anforderungen für nachhaltige Produkte, zur Änderung der Richtlinie (EU) 2020/1828 und der Verordnung (EU) 2023/1542 und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 2009/125/EG. Stand: 2024. Internet: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401781. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  112. [12] Martínez Leal, J.; Pompidou, S.; Charbuillet, C. et al.: Design for and from Recycling: A Circular Ecodesign Approach to Improve the Circular Economy. Sustainability 12 (2020) 23,#9861 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  113. [13] Büttner, S.; Handmann, U.; Irrek, W.: Transformation zur Circular Economy. Kleine und mittlere Unternehmen im Wandel begleiten. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  114. [14] DIN SPEC 91472:2023–06: Remanufacturing (Reman) – Qualitätsklassifizierung für zirkuläre Prozesse. Deutsche Fassung Juni 2023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  115. [15] Hermandi, C.; Dierke, L.; Grundmann, M. et al.: Potenzialcheck Circular Economy. In: Büttner, S.; Handmann, U.; Irrek, W. (Hrsg.): Transformation zur Circular Economy. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2024, S. 85–96 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  116. [16] Golta, K.: So funktioniert Circular Design. Das Fortschrittsdenken kommt an seine Grenzen. Zeit für eine neue Art, die Welt zu denken – und zu gestalten. Stand: 11.02.2022. Internet: page-online.de/tools-technik/circular-design-prozess-projekte/. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  117. [17] Draser, B.; Sander, E.: Nachhaltiges Design. Herkunft, Zukunft, Perspektiven. München: oekom 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  118. [18] Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Design and the circular economy – deep dive. Stand: 16.09.2019. Internet: www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/design-and-the-circular-economy-deep-dive. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  119. [19] CIRCO: Methodology. Internet: www.circonl.nl/international/methodology/. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  120. [20] Stölzle, M.; Giunta, S.; Rietdorf, C. et al.: Towards Sustainable Urban Mobility: Integrating Design for Circular Economy Principles in E-Scooter Development. 35th CIRP Design 2025, 02–04 April 2025, Patras, Greece. [Accepted paper, in press] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  121. [21] Siwiec, D.; Pacana, A.; Gazda, A.: A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy. Energies 16 (2023) 5, #2474 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  122. [22] Umweltbundesamt: Homepage Ecodesign Kit. Stand: 2025. Internet: ecodesignkit.de/. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  123. [23] CIRCit Nord: Tools – CIRCit Nord. Stand:2025. Internet: circitnord.com/tools/. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  124. [24] DDC – Dansk Design Center: Designing Your Circular Transition. Internet: ddc.dk/tools/designing-your-circular-transition/. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  125. [25] Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Tools and resources to help transition to a circular economy. Stand: 2025. Internet: www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-design/tools. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  126. [26] Institute of Design Research Vienna: Circular Design Rules. Stand: 2023. Internet: cdr.tools/. Zugriff am 31.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-30
  127. [1] Dusseldorp, M.: Zielkonflikte der Nachhaltigkeit. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien 2017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  128. [2] Elkington, J.: Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford, U.K.: Capstone 1997 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  129. [3] Dusseldorp, M.: Die Krux mit Zielkonflikten. TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 27 (2018) 2, S. 61–67, doi.org/10.14512/tatup.27.2.61 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  130. [4] Hahn, T.; Figge, F.; Pinkse, J. et al.: Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: you can‘t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment 19 (2010) 4, pp. 217–229 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  131. [5] Gbededo, M. A.; Liyanage, K.; Garza-Reyes, J. A.: Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis: A systematic review of approaches to sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production 184 (2018), pp. 1002–1015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  132. [6] Koch, D.; Sauer, A.: Identifying and Dealing with Interdependencies and Conflicts between Goals in Manufacturing Companies’ Sustainability Measures. Sustainability 16 (2024). 9, #3817 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  133. [7] Herrmann, C.: Ganzheitliches Life Cycle Management. Nachhaltigkeit und Lebenszyklusorientierung in Unternehmen. Heidelberg: Springer 2010 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  134. [8] Leiden, A.; Thiede, S.; Herrmann, C.: Synergetic Modelling of Energy and Resource Efficiency as well as Occupational Safety and Health Risks of Plating Process Chains. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology 9 (2022) 3, pp. 795–815 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  135. [9] Figge, F.; Hahn, T.; Schaltegger, S. et al.: The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment 11 (2002) 5, pp. 269–284 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  136. [10] Meißner, M.; Myrzik, J.; Wiederkehr, P.: Representation of energy efficiency interdependencies of manufacturing processes on the shop floor level. Procedia CIRP 88 (2020), pp. 252–257 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  137. [11] Huang, A.; Badurdeen, F.: Sustainable Manufacturing Performance Evaluation: Integrating Product and Process Metrics for Systems Level Assessment. Procedia Manufacturing 8 (2017), pp. 563–570 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  138. [12] Kononova, N.; Juraschek, M.; Kohlgrüber, M. et al.: Advanced Sustainability Action Plan: Supporting manufacturing SMEs on a sustainability pathway. Procedia CIRP 122 (2024), pp. 354–359 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  139. [13] Gebler, M.; Warsen, J.; Meininghaus, R. et al.: Implementing Zero Impact Factories in Volkswagen’s Global Automotive Manufacturing System: A Discussion of Opportunities and Challenges from Integrating Current Science into Strategic Management. Sustainability 16 (2024) 7, #3011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  140. [14] Gerdes, C.; Maier-Speredelozzi, V.: A Case Study for Sustainable Routing in Manufacturing Enterprises. In: Barker, K.; Berry, D.; Rainwater, C. (Hrsg.): IISE Annual Conference and Expo 2018. Orlando, Florida, USA, 2018, pp. 913–918 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  141. [15] Gerbens-Leenes, P.; Moll, H.; Schoot Uiterkamp, A.: Design and development of a measuring method for environmental sustainability in food production systems. Ecological Economics 46 (2003) 2, pp. 231–248 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  142. [16] Erdil, N. O.; Aktas, C. B.; Arani, O. M.: Embedding sustainability in lean six sigma efforts. Journal of Cleaner Production 198 (2018), pp. 520–529. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  143. [17] Weise, S.; Ali, A.-R.; Cerdas, F. et al.: Determination of circular economy targets based on absolute sustainability: A case study on plastics. Procedia CIRP 122 (2024), pp. 743–747 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  144. [18] Ali, A.-R.; Castillo, M. S.; Cerdas, F. et al.: A stepwise approach for determining absolute environmental sustainability targets for an electric vehicle battery. CIRP Annals 73 (2024) 1, pp. 1–4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  145. [19] Rüegg-Stürm, J.; Grand, S.: Das St. Galler Management-Modell. Management in einer komplexen Welt. Bern: Haupt Verlag 2019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  146. [20] Eisenführ, F.; Weber, M.; Langer, T.: Rationales Entscheiden. Heidelberg: Springer 2010. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  147. [21] Al-Aomar, R.: Sustainability Function Deployment: A system-level design-for-sustainability. In: 2019 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon). 2019 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), Orlando, FL, USA, 2019, pp. 1–6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  148. [22] Yim, H.; Herrmann, C.: Eco-voice of consumer (VOC) on QFD. In: 2003 EcoDesign 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing – EcoDesign ‚03, Tokyo, Japan, 2003, pp. 618–625 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  149. [23] Mizuno, S.; Akao, Y.: Quality function deployment: a company-wide quality approach. Tokyo: JUSE Press 1978 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  150. [24] Akao, Y. (Hrsg.): Quality function deployment. Integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge, Mass.: Productivity Jurík, L.; Horňáková, N.; Šantavá, E. et al.: Application of AHP method for project selection in the context of sustainable development. Wireless Netorks. 28 (2022) 2, pp. 893–902 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  151. [25] Pattanaik, L. N.; Baug, T. K.; Koteswarapavan, C.: A hybrid ELECTRE based prioritization of conjoint tools for lean and sustainable manufacturing. Production Engineering 13 (2019) 6, pp. 665–673 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  152. [26] Rao, R. V.; Patel, B. K.: Novel method for decision making in the manufacturing environment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 225 (2011) 3, pp. 422–434 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  153. [27] Koltze, K.; Souchkov, V.: Systematische Innovation. TRIZ-Anwendung in der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung. München: Cal Hanser Verlag 2017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  154. [28] Stehr, J.; Yang, C. J.; Chen, a. L. et al.: A Cladistic and TRIZ-based Approach for Enhancing Decision Making in Technology and Innovation Management. Proceedings of the 17th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Hefei, China, 2010, no pages Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-38
  155. [1] Hingst, L.; Dér, A.; Herrmann, C. et al.: Towards a Holistic Life Cycle Costing and Assessment of Factories: Qualitative Modeling of Interdependencies in Factory Systems. Sustainability 15 (2023) 5, #4478 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  156. [2] Moldavska, A.; Abreu-Peralta, J. V.: Learning Factories for the Operationalization of Sustainability Assessment Tools for Manufacturing: Bridging the Gap between Academia and Industry. Procedia CIRP 54 (2016), pp. 95–100 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  157. [3] European Commission: Gerechte und nachhaltige Wirtschaft: Kommission legt Unternehmensregeln für Achtung der Menschenrechte und der Umwelt in globalen Wertschöpfungsketten fest. Stand: 23.02.2022. Internet: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/de/ip_22_1145. Zugriff am 03.04.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  158. [4] Statistisches Bundesamt (Hrsg.): Industrie-Investitionen in Klimaschutz binnen zehn Jahren um 74 % gestiegen. Stand: 28.11.2023. Internet: www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2023/11/PD23_N062_32.html. Zugriff am 27.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  159. [5] ifaa – Institut für angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft e. V.: Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement – Handbuch für die Unternehmenspraxis. Gestaltung und Umsetzung von Nachhaltigkeit in kleinen und mittleren Betrieben. Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg 2021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  160. [6] Chen, D.; Schudeleit, T.; Posselt, G. et al.: A State-of-the-art Review and Evaluation of Tools for Factory Sustainability Assessment. Procedia CIRP 9 (2013), pp. 85–90 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  161. [7] Feng, C.; Huang, S.: The Analysis of Key Technologies for Sustainable Machine Tools Design. Applied Sciences 10 (2020) 3, #731 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  162. [8] Züst, S.; Züst, R.; Schudeleit, T. et al.: Development and Application of an Eco-design Tool for Machine Tools. Procedia CIRP 48 (2016), pp. 431–436 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  163. [9] Domingo, R.; Aguado, S.: Overall Environmental Equipment Effectiveness as a Metric of a Lean and Green Manufacturing System. Sustainability 7 (2015) 7, pp. 9031–9047 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  164. [10] Cercós, M. P.; Calvo, L. M.; Domingo, R.: An exploratory study on the relationship of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) variables and CO2 emissions. Procedia Manufacturing 41 (2019), pp. 224–232 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  165. [11] Durán, O.; Capaldo, A.; Duran Acevedo, P.: Sustainable Overall Throughputability Effectiveness (S.O.T.E.) as a Metric for Production Systems. Sustainability 10 (2018) 2, p. 362 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  166. [12] Schlagenhauf, T.; Netzer, M.; Fleischer, J.: OEE+ : Ein Vorschlag zur zeitgemäßen Erweiterung der OEE um Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte. wt Werkstattstechnik 112 (2022) 7–8, S. 481–486. Internet: www.werkstattstechnik.de. Düsseldorf: VDI Fachmedien Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  167. [13] Garza-Reyes, J. A.: From measuring overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) to overall resource effectiveness (ORE). Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 21 (2015) 4, pp. 506–527 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  168. [14] Keller, F.; Schultz, C.; Simon, P. et al.: Integration and Interaction of Energy Flexible Manufacturing Systems within a Smart Grid. Procedia CIRP 61 (2017), pp. 416–421 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  169. [15] Dehli, M.: Abwärmenutzung in Industrie und Gewerbe. In: Dehli, M. (Hrsg.): Energieeffizienz in Industrie, Dienstleistung und Gewerbe. Energietechnische Optimierungskonzepte für Unternehmen. Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg 2020, S. 145–201 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  170. [16] Mert, G.; Bohr, C.; Waltemode, S. et al.: Increasing the Resource Efficiency of Machine Tools by Life Cycle Oriented Services. Procedia CIRP 15 (2014), pp. 176–181 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  171. [17] Winroth, M.; Almström, P.; Andersson, C.: Sustainable production indicators at factory level. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 27 (2016) 6, pp. 842–873 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  172. [18] Fechter, M.; Dietz, T.: Bewertung der Wandlungsfähigkeit eines Produktionssystems. ARENA2036. Heidelberg: Springer 2020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  173. [19] Centoamore, P.; Pinto, L. F. R.: Remanufacturing Assessment of Machine Tools under a Circular Economy Perspective: A Resource Conservation Initiative. Sustainability 16 (2024) 8, p. 3109 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  174. [20] Schudeleit, T.; Züst, S.; Weiss, L. et al.: The Total Energy Efficiency Index for machine tools. Energy 102 (2016), pp. 682–693 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  175. [21] Hegab, H. A.; Darras, B.; Kishawy, H. A.: Towards sustainability assessment of machining processes. Journal of Cleaner Production 170 (2018), pp. 694–703 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  176. [22] Gottmann, J.: Produktionscontrolling. Wertströme und Kosten optimieren. Heidelberg: Springer Gabler 2019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  177. [23] Faulkner, W.; Badurdeen, F.: Sustainable Value Stream Mapping (Sus-VSM): methodology to visualize and assess manufacturing sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 85 (2014), pp. 8–18 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  178. [24] Hollmann, S.; Klimmer, F.; Schmidt, K. H. et al.: Validation of a questionnaire for assessing physical work load. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 25 (1999) 2, pp. 105–114 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-47
  179. [1] Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung: Klimaabkommen von Paris. Stand: 2025. Internet: www.bmz.de/de/service/lexikon/klimaabkommen-von-paris-14602. Zugriff am 12.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  180. [2] Mitteilung der Kommission: Der europäische Grüne Deal. Brüssel 11.12.2019. Internet: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?qid=1588580774040&uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0640. Zugriff am 12.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  181. [3] Wissenschaftliche Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages: Nationale Klimaschutzziele in Deutschland. Stand: 2023. Internet: www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/988664/b64883e7649ec1fde09e333c8a547a5b/WD-8–071–23-pdf.pdf. Zugriff am 12.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  182. [4] Agora Energiewende: Die Energiewende in Deutschland: Stand der Dinge 2024. Stand: 2025. Internet: www.agora-energiewende.de/publikationen/die-energiewende-in-deutschland-stand-der-dinge-2024. Zugriff am 12.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  183. [5] Bundesministerium der Justiz: Bundes-Klimaschutzgesetz vom 12. Dezember 2019 (BGBl. I S. 2513), das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 15. Juli 2024 (BGBl. 2024 I Nr. 235) geändert worden ist. Stand: 2019. Internet: www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ksg/BJNR251310019.html. Zugriff am 12.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  184. [6] Bundesministerium der Justiz: Gesetz zur Steigerung der Energieeffizienz in Deutschland: Energieeffizienzgesetz vom 13. November 2023 (BGBl. 2023 I Nr. 309). EnEfG. Stand: 2023. Internet: www.gesetze-im-internet.de/enefg/EnEfG.pdf. Zugriff am 12.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  185. [7] Viebahn, P.; Schüwer, D.; Holz, G. et al.: Dekarbonisierung der industriellen Produktion (DekarbInd). Ganzheitliches Bewertungsschema für Technologien. Stand: 2024. Internet: /www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/11850/publikationen/05_2024_cc_dekarblnd_tb1.pdf. Zugriff am 12.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  186. [8] Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Energieeffizienz in der Produktion: Der Energieeffizienz-Index der deutschen Industrie. Stand: 23.01.2025. Internet: https://www.eep.uni-stuttgart.de/eei/. Zugriff am 12.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  187. [9] Torolsan, K.; Grabisch, M.: Energieeffizienz-Index der deutschen Industrie: Ergebnisse der Wintererhebung 2024. Institut für Energieeffizienz in der Produktion. Universität Stuttgart. Stand: 2024. Internet: www.eep.uni-stuttgart.de/dokumente/EEI-Winter-2024_25/EEIndex_Briefing-Event_Wintererhebung-2024.pdf. Zugriff am 13.03.2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  188. [10] Sauer, A.; Schneider, C.: Energieeffizienz in der Industrie. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-55
  189. [1] Kluth, A.; Kübler, P.: Transparenzmessung in der Produktionslogistik. wt Werkstattstechnik online 108 (2018) 03, S. 143–147 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  190. [2] Ungern-Sternberg, R.: Analyse der Dispositionskomplexität in der wertstromorientierten Variantenfertigung. Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, 2023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  191. [3] Wiendahl, H.-H.: Auftragsmanagement der industriellen Produktion. Grundlagen, Konfiguration, Einführung. Berlin: Springer 2011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  192. [4] Bach, T.; Schuh, G.; Reschke, J.: Produktionsplanung und -steuerung im Kontext von Industrie 4.0. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 114 (2019) 12, S. 815–818 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  193. [5] Wiendahl, H.-H.: Situative Konfiguration des Auftragsmanagements im turbulenten Umfeld. Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, 2002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  194. [6] Hänggi, R.; Fimpel, A.; Siegenthaler, R.: LEAN Production - einfach und umfassend. Ein praxisorientierter Leitfaden zu schlanken Prozessen mit Bildern erklärt. Berlin: Springer 2021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  195. [7] Erlach, K.: Wertstromdesign. Der Weg zur schlanken Fabrik. Berlin: Springer Vieweg 2020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  196. [8] Ohno, T.: Das Toyota-Produktionssystem. Frankfurt/New York: Campus-Verlag 1993 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  197. [9] Gudehus, T.: Logistik. Grundlagen - Strategien - Anwendungen. Heidelberg: Springer 2010 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  198. [10] Lödding, H.: Verfahren der Fertigungssteuerung. Grundlagen, Beschreibung, Konfiguration. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg 2016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  199. [11] Schönsleben, P.: Handbuch Integrales Logistikmanagement. Operations und Supply Chain Management innerhalb des Unternehmens und unternehmensübergreifend. Berlin: Springer 2024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  200. [12] Nyhuis, P.; Wiendahl, H.-P.: Logistische Kennlinien. Grundlagen, Werkzeuge und Anwendungen. Berlin: Springer Vieweg 2012 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  201. [13] Wiendahl, H.-P.; Wiendahl, H.-H.: Betriebsorganisation für Ingenieure. München: Hanser 2019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  202. [14] Verein Deutscher Ingenieure: VDI 3601. Warehouse-Management-Systeme. Berlin: Beuth Verlag 2015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  203. [15] Baltes, O.; Daniel, M.; Rosenhauer, J. et al.: Materialwirtschaft mit SAP S/4HANA. Das Praxishandbuch. Bonn: Rheinwerk Verlag 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  204. [16] Käber, A.: Warehouse Management mit SAP. Effektive Lagerverwaltung mit WM. Bonn: Rheinwerk Verlag 2021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  205. [17] Licha, I.: Bestandsführung und Kontenfindung mit SAP ERP (MM). Gleichen: Espresso Tutorials GmbH 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  206. [18] Schuh, G.; Stich, V.: Produktionsplanung und -steuerung 1. Grundlagen der PPS. Berlin: Springer 2012 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  207. [19] Wehking, K.-H.: Technisches Handbuch Logistik 2. Fördertechnik, Materialfluss, Intralogistik. Berlin: Springer 2020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  208. [20] Kletti, J.; Rieger, J.: Die Perfekte Produktion. Manufacturing Excellence in der Smart Factory. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg 2023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  209. [21] Bauernhansl, T.; Krüger, J.; Reinhart, G. et al.: WGP-Standpunkt Industrie 4.0. Darmstadt 2016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  210. [22] Ungern-Sternberg, R.; Merz, C. K.: Design Guidelines For Digital Kanban Systems With High Service Level. Proceedings of the Conference on Production Systems and Logistics (2023) 2, S. 824–836 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-63
  211. [1] Fang, X.; Kloska, T.: Hybrid forming of sheet metals with long Fiber-reinforced thermoplastics (LFT) by a combined deep drawing and compression molding process. International Journal of Material Forming 13 (2020), pp. 561–575, doi.org/10.1007/s12289–019–01493–4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  212. [2] Lin, Y.; Min, J.; Teng, H. et al.: Flexural Performance of Steel–FRP Composites for Automotive Applications. Automotive Innovation 3 (2020), pp. 280–295, doi.org/10.1007/s42154–020–00109-x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  213. [3] Kavitha, K.; Vijayan, R.; Sathishkumar, T.: Fiber-metal laminates: a review of reinforcement and formability characteristics. Materials Today. Proceedings 22 (2020), pp. 601–605, doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.232 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  214. [4] Reisgen, U.; Schiebahn, A.; Lotte, J. et al.: Innovative joining technology for the production of hybrid components from FRP and metals. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 282 (2020), doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116674 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  215. [5] Drössler, R.; Waffler, R.; Krahl, M. et aö.: Tool technology for lightweight structures in 3-D hybrid designs. Lightweight Design Worldwide 11 (2018), pp. 42–47, doi.org/10.1007/s41777–018–0040-x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  216. [6] Lee, M.; Seo, H.; Kang, C.: Comparison of collision test results for center-pillar reinforcements with TWB and CR420/CFRP hybrid composite materials using experimental and theoretical methods. Composite Structures 168 (2017), pp. 698–709, doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.068 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  217. [7] Sheikh-Ahmad, J.: Machining of polymer composites. New York: Springer- 2009, doi.org/10.1007/978–0–387–68619–6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  218. [8] Nguyen-Dinh, N.; Hejjaji, A.; Zitoune, R. et al.: Machining of FRP Composites: Surface Quality, Damage, and Material Integrity: Critical Review and Analysis. In: Sidhu, S.; Bains, P.; Zitoune, R et al.. (eds) Futuristic Composites. Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials. Singapore: Springer 2018, doi.org/10.1007/978–981–13–2417–8_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  219. [9] Fleischer, J.; Teti, R.; Lanza, G. et al.: Composite materials parts manufacturing. CIRP Annals 67 (2018) 2, pp. 603–626, doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.05.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  220. [10] Ge, J.; Catalanotti, G.; Falzon, B. et al.: Process characteristics, damage mechanisms and challenges in machining of fibre reinforced thermoplastic polymer (FRTP) composites: A review. Composites Part B: Engineering 273 (2024) #111247, doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11124 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  221. [11] Bhatnagar, N.; Singh, I.; Nayak, D.: Damage Investigation in Drilling of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Composite Laminates. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 19 (2004) 6, pp. 995–1007, doi.org/10.1081/AMP-200034486 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  222. [12] Wang, F.; Zhao, M.; Fu, R. et al.: Novel chip-breaking structure of step drill for drilling damage reduction on CFRP/Al stack. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 291 (2021) #117033, doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.117033. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  223. [13] Uhlmann, E.; Sammler, F.; Richarz, S. et al.: Machining of Carbon and Glass Fibre Reinforced Composites. Procedia CIRP 46 (2016), pp. 63–66, doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.197 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  224. [14] Gebhardt, A.; Esch, P.; Hertrich, M.: Bohrbearbeitung von Luftfahrt-Stack-Werkstoffen. Lightweight Design 9 (2016) 4, pp. 12–15, doi.org/10.1007/s35725–016–0037–5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  225. [15] Modler, N.; Adam, F.; Maaß, J. et al.: Intrinsic Lightweight Steel-Composite Hybrids for Structural Components. Materials Science Forum 825–826 (2015), pp. 401–408, doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.825–826.401 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  226. [16] Bader, B.; Berlin, W.; Demes, M.: Multimaterialbauweise in der Fahrzeugstruktur. ATZ Produktion 7 (2020) 3–4, pp. 34–39, doi.org/10.1007/s35726–020–0089–9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-73
  227. [1] Sonsino, C. M.: „Dauerfestigkeit“ - Eine Fiktion. Konstruktion 4 (2005), S. 87–92 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  228. [2] DIN EN ISO/ASTM 52900:2022-03: Additive Fertigung - Grundlagen - Terminologie (ISO/ASTM 52900:2021); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO/ASTM 52900:2021, DOI: 10.31030/3290011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  229. [3] Basquin, O. H.: The exponential law of endurance tests, 1910, S. 625–630 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  230. [4] Coffin, L. F.: A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal. Trans. ASME 76 (1954), S. 931–981 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  231. [5] Manson, S. S.: Fatigue: a complex subject – some simple approximations. Experimental Mechanics 5 (1965) 7, S. 193–226 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  232. [6] Morrow, J. D.: Cyclic plastic strain energy and fatigue of metals. In: ASTM STP 378. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 1965, S. 45–87 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  233. [7] Ramberg, W.; Osgood, W. R.: NACA technical notes, No. 902, Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), 1943 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  234. [8] Wagener, R.: Zyklisches Werkstoffverhalten bei konstanter und variabler Beanspruchungsamplitude, Dissertation: IMAB, TU Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  235. [9] Wagener, R.; Melz, T.: Deriving a Continuous Fatigue Life Curve from LCF to VHCF. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0330, 2017, DOI: 10.4271/2017-01-0330 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  236. [10] VDA Recommendation 239-300: Experimental Determination of Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Sheets for CAE-Calculation – Testing and Documentation, February 2021 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  237. [11] Möller, B.; Kiel, M.; Wagener, R., Taliani, E.; Kordaß, R.; Schramm, M.; Gradinger, R.: Development and fatigue assessment of wire arc additively manufactured hollow structures made of AA6063 as a basis for functional integrated sections applied to a motorcycle handlebar. Procedia Structural Integrity 53 (2024), S. 190–202, DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2024.01.024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  238. [12] Wagener, R.; Kiel, M.: Deriving Representative Structural Elements for the fatigue approach of Wire Arc Additively Manufactured components. Procedia Structural Integrity 53 (2024), S. 161–171, DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2024.01.019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  239. [13] Wagener, R; Melz, T.; Fischer, C.; Matthias, M.; Kaufmann, H.: Neue experimentelle Methoden zur Untersuchung des Einflusses variabler zyklischer Belastungen in HCF- und VHCF-Bereich. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik 42 (2011) 10, S. 929-933, DOI: 10.1002/mawe.201100866 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  240. [14] Wagener, R.; Möller, B.; Scurria, M.; Bein, T.: A fatigue life approach for additively manufactured structures. TMS 2020, 149th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings, The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society (TMS Annual Meeting and Exhibition) 2020, FS 127-137, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36296-6_12 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  241. [15] Wagener, R.; Chiocca, A.: Representative structure elements for the fatigue assessment of additively manufactured components. Procedia Structural. Integrity 34 (2021), S. 259–265, DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2021.12.037 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  242. [16] Wagener, R.; Kiel, M.: Enhancing the fatigue life approach by the usage of Representative Structural Elements. Procedia Structural Integrity 53 (2024), S. 151-160, DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2024.01.019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82
  243. [17] Schnabel, K.; Baumgartner, J.; Möller, B.: Fatigue Assessment of Additively Manufactured Metallic Structures Using Local Approaches Based on Finite-Element Simulations. Procedia Structural Integrity 19 (2019), S. 442-451. DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.048 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-04-82

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien