Consulting in Context: Legitimacy of Management Consultants in Public Administration and at Universities

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: mrev management revue Volume 33 (2022), Issue 1
Open Access Full access

mrev management revue

Volume 33 (2022), Issue 1

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2022
ISSN-Online
1861-9908
ISSN-Print
0935-9915

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 33 (2022), Issue 1

Consulting in Context: Legitimacy of Management Consultants in Public Administration and at Universities

Authors:
ISSN-Print
0935-9915
ISSN-Online
1861-9908
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Alvesson, M., & Empson, L. (2008). The construction of organizational identity: Comparative case studies of consulting firms. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(1), 1-16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  2. Alvesson, M., Kärreman, D., Sturdy, A., & Handley, K. (2009). Unpacking the client(s). Constructions, positions and client–consultant dynamics. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(3), 253-263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  3. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33, 1-4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  4. Baumann, J., & Krücken, G. (2019). Debated legitimacy: Accreditation in German higher education. Higher Education Policy, 32(1), 29-48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  5. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  6. Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2004). Noise, parasites and translation: Theory and practice in management consulting. Management Learning, 35(1), 31-44. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  8. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  9. FEACO (2019). Survey of the European management consultancy 2018/2019. Retrieved 20.03.2020, from www.feaco.org/sites/default/files/sitepagefiles/Feaco.Survey%202018-2019.pdf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  10. Fincham, R. (2012). The client in the client-consultant relationship. In: M. Kipping & T. Clark (eds.), The Oxford handbook of management consulting (pp. 411-426). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  11. Frost, J., Hattke, F., & Reihlen, M. (eds.) (2016). Multi-level governance in universities: Strategy, structure, control. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  12. Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2010). Florence Nightingale endures: Legitimizing a new professional role identity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 55-84. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  13. Hampel, C. E., Lawrence, T., & Tracey, P. (2017). Institutional work: Taking stock and making it matter. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence & R. E. Meyer (eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 558-590). London: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  14. Hodge, G., & Bowman, D. (2006). Privatization and market development: Global movements in public policy ideas. In: G. A. Hodge (ed.), Privatization and market development: Global movements in public policy ideas (pp. 97-126). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  15. Hüther, O., & Krücken, G. (2018). Higher education in Germany – recent developments in an international perspective (Higher Education Dynamics, 49). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  16. Hwang, H., & Colyvas, J.A. (2011). Problematizing actors and institutions in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 62-66. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  17. Jepperson, R. L., & Meyer, J. (2021). Institutional theory: The cultural construction of organizations, states, and identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  18. Karantinou, K. M., & Hogg, M. K. (2009). An empirical investigation of relationship development in profes-sional business services. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(4), 249-260. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  19. Krücken, G., & Serrano-Velarde, K. (2016). Der Berater als Fremder. Eine soziologische Studie zur Managementberatung in Universitäten. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 68, 29-51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  20. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby. R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In: S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence & W. R. Nord (eds.), Handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215-254). London, UK: SAGE. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  21. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52-58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  22. Maguire S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  23. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  24. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  25. Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100-120. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  26. Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. The American Behavioral Scientist, 7(49), 1000-1014. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  27. Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M., & Hammerschmid, G. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 861-885. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  28. Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2016). Laying a smoke screen: Ambiguity and neutralization as strategic responses to intra-institutional complexity. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 373-406. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  29. Nikolova, N., Reihlen, M., & Schlapfner, J.-F. (2009). Client–consultant interaction: Capturing social practices of professional service production. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(3), 289-298. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  30. Pemer, F., & Werr, A. (2013). The uncertain management consulting services client. International Studies of Management & Organization, 43(3), 22-40. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  31. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  32. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629-652. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  33. Saint-Martin, D. (2004): Building the new managerialists state: Consultants and the politics of public sector reform in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  34. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294-308. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313077. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  35. Seidenschnur, T., & Krücken, G. (2019). Constructing the consultant as a legitimate actor: The role of active clients in universities. In: H. Hwang, J. A. Colyvas & G. S. Drori (eds.), Agents, Actors, Actorhood: Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, Action, and Authority (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 58, pp. 111-133). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  36. Serrano-Velarde, K. (2010). A fish out of water? Management consultants in academia. Minerva, 48(2), 125-144. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  37. Slack, T. (2014). The commercial impact of sport, the role of sport management. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(5), 454-463. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  38. Sturdy, A. (1997). The consultancy process – An insecure business? Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 389-413. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  39. Sturdy, A., Werr, A., & Buono, A. F. (2009). The client in management consultancy research: Mapping the territory. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(3), 247-252. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  40. Sturdy, A., & Wright, C. (2011). The active client: The boundary-spanning roles of internal consultants as gatekeepers, brokers and partners of their external counterparts. Management Learning, 42(5), 485-503. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  41. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  42. Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451-478. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  43. Thurlow, A., & Mills, J. H. (2015). Telling tales out of school. Sensemaking and narratives of legitimacy in an organizational change process. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(2), 246-254. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  44. Tracey, P., Dalpiaz, E., & Phillips, N. (2018). Fish out of water: Translation, legitimation, and new venture creation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1627-1666. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  45. Trank, C. Q., & Washington, M. (2009). Maintaining an institution in a contested organizational field: The work of AACSB and its constituents. In: T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 236-261). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  46. Vogel, R. (2012). Framing and counter‐framing New Public Management: The case of Germany. Public Administration, 90(2), 370-392. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19
  47. Whetten, D. A. (2009). Organizational comparative analysis: Investigating similarities and differences among organizations. In: B. G. King, T. Felin & D. A. Whetten (eds.), Studying differences between organizations: Comparative approaches to organizational research (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 26, pp. 63-87). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2022-1-19

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media