The dialectic of civilisation: Norbert Elias, the triad of controls, and social- ecological transformation

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Edition 2
Open Access Full access

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Volume 10 (2025), Edition 2

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Publication year
2025
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 10 (2025), Edition 2

The dialectic of civilisation: Norbert Elias, the triad of controls, and social- ecological transformation

Authors:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Preview:

This paper revisits Norbert Elias’s theory of the civilising process in light of the ecological, economic, and political transformations of the 21st century. It argues that Elias’s triad of controls – over the self (psychogenesis), over others (sociogenesis), and over nature (ecogenesis) – provides a powerful but incomplete framework for understanding modern social development. By reinterpreting economic growth as a historically specific articulation of the civilising process, the paper highlights how the very dynamics of civilisational progress now generate destabilising effects – ecological overshoot, social fragmentation, and affective exhaustion. Drawing on political ecology and post-growth scholarship, it proposes a dialectical reading of Elias: one that recognises both the stabilising and the disruptive potential of ‘civilising’ processes under conditions of capitalist modernity. Rather than framing post-growth as a decivilising regression, the paper explores it as a potential reconfiguration of Elias’s triad centered on collective self-limitation, localised interdependence, and convivial autonomy.

Bibliography

  1. Adamczak, B. (2017). Beziehungsweise Revolution: 1917, 1968 und kommende. Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  2. Anders, K. (2000). Die unvermeidliche Universalgeschichte. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  3. Arora, S., Dyck, B. V., Sharma, D., & Stirling, A. (2020). Control, care, and conviviality in the politics of technology for sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1816687 Open Google Scholar
  4. Asara, V. (2015). Democracy without growth: The political ecology of the Indignados movement [PhD thesis]. Universitat Autònoma. Open Google Scholar
  5. Asara, V., Profumi, E., & Kallis, G. (2013). Degrowth, democracy and autonomy. Environmental Values, 22(2), 217–239. Open Google Scholar
  6. Barca, S. (2014). Laboring the Earth: Transnational Reflections on the Environmental History of Work. Environmental History, 19(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emt099 Open Google Scholar
  7. Baumgart, R., & Eichener, V. (2017). Norbert Elias zur Einführung. Junius Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  8. Bello, W. (2005). Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy. Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  9. Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B. (2016). The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. Verso. Open Google Scholar
  10. Borowy, I., & Schmelzer, M. (Eds.). (2017). History of the Future of Economic Growth. Historical roots of current debates on sustainable degrowth. Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  11. Brand, U., Muraca, B., Pineault, É., Sahakian, M., Schaffartzik, A., Novy, A., Streissler, C., Haberl, H., Asara, V., Dietz, K., Lang, M., Kothari, A., Smith, T., Spash, C., Brad, A., Pichler, M., Plank, C., Velegrakis, G., Jahn, T., … Görg, C. (2021). From planetary to societal boundaries: An argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754 Open Google Scholar
  12. Brand, U., & Wissen, M. (2024). Kapitalismus am Limit: Öko-imperiale Spannungen, umkämpfte Krisenpolitik und solidarische Perspektiven. oekom verlag GmbH. Open Google Scholar
  13. Büttner, M., & Schmelzer, M. (2021). Fossile Mentalitäten. Zur Geschichte der fossilen Durchdringung moderner Vorstellungswelten. Working Paper Nr. 3, Mentalitäten Im Fluss (Flumen), Jena. https://www.flumen.uni-jena.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Working-Paper-Nr.-3_Schmelzer-und-Buettner_Fossile-Mentalitaeten-Zur-Geschichte-der-fossilen-Durchdringung-moderner-Vorstellungswelten-1.pdf Open Google Scholar
  14. Caffentzis, G. (2013). In Letters of Blood and Fire: Work, Machines, and the Crisis of Capitalism. PM Press. Open Google Scholar
  15. Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. Anthem Press. Open Google Scholar
  16. Dale, G. (2012). The growth paradigm: A critique. International Socialism, 134. Open Google Scholar
  17. Dörre, K., Lessenich, S., & Rosa, H. (2009). Soziologie—Kapitalismus – Kritik: eine Debatte. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  18. Duerr, H. P. (1988). Der Mythos vom Zivilisationsprozeß: Band 1: Nacktheit und Scham. Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  19. Duerr, H. P. (2005). Der Mythos vom Zivilisationsprozeß: Band 5: Die Tatsachen des Lebens. Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  20. Durand, C., Hofferberth, E., & Schmelzer, M. (2024). Planning beyond growth: The case for economic democracy within ecological limits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140351 Open Google Scholar
  21. Eastwood, L., & Heron, K. (Eds.). (2024). De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth. In De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth. De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  22. Elias, N. (1971). Sociology of Knowledge: New Perspectives, Part 2. Sociology, 5(3), 355–370. Open Google Scholar
  23. Elias, N. (1992). Zivilisation. In B. Schäfers (Ed.), Grundbegriffe der Soziologie (pp. 382–387). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14856-2_142 Open Google Scholar
  24. Elias, N. (1997a). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Wandlungen des Verhaltens in den westlichen Oberschichten des Abendlandes. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  25. Elias, N. (1997b). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Wandlungen der Gesellschaft. Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  26. Elias, N. (2001). The Society of Individuals. Continuum. Open Google Scholar
  27. Elias, N. (2003). Engagement und Distanzierung. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  28. Elias, N. (2006). Gesammelte Schriften in 19 Bänden: Band 5: Was ist Soziologie? (A. Treibel, Ed.). Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  29. Elias, N. (1989). Studien über die Deutschen: Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  30. Elias, N., & Steenhuis, A. (1984). We still haven’t learnt to control nature and ourselves enough. Interview with Aafke Stenhuis. http://www.kuwi.uni-linz.ac.at/hyperelias/z-elias/abstracts/FullText-eng-1996-T-eng-2.htm Open Google Scholar
  31. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  32. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2017). Mehr als Weniger: Erste Überlegungen zur Frage nach dem Postwachstumssubjekt. Psychosozial, 40(2), 83–100. Open Google Scholar
  33. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2019). Degrowth und Männlichkeiten – Zur Geschlechtlichkeit des relationalen Postwachstumssubjekts. In A. Heilmann & S. Scholz (Eds.), Caring Masculinities? Auf der Suche nach Transformationswegen in eine demokratische Postwachstumsgesellschaft (pp. 173–184). oekom. Open Google Scholar
  34. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2023). Degrowth and Masculinities: Towards a gendered understanding of degrowth subjectivities. Degrowth Journal, 1. https://www.degrowthjournal.org/publications/2023-04-26-degrowth-and-masculinities-towards-a-gendered-understanding-of-degrowth-subjectivities/ Open Google Scholar
  35. Fioramonti, L. (2013). Gross Domestic Problem: The Politics Behind the World’s Most Powerful Number. Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  36. Fressoz, J.-B. (2024). More and More and More: An All-Consuming History of Energy (1st ed.). Allen Lane. Open Google Scholar
  37. Freud, S. (2010). Civilization and Its Discontents. W. W. Norton & Company. Open Google Scholar
  38. Ghosh, A. (2021). The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis. University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  39. Görg, C. (1999). Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse. Westfälisches Dampfboot. Open Google Scholar
  40. Goudsblom, J. (1995). Fire And Civilization. Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  41. Graeber, D. (2019). Bullshit Jobs: The Rise of Pointless Work, and What We Can Do About It (1st ed.). Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  42. Groos, J., & Sorg, C. (2025). Creative Construction: Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond. Bristol University Press. Open Google Scholar
  43. Hamilton, C. (2016). The Theodicy of the “Good Anthropocene.” Environmental Humanities, 7(1), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3616434 Open Google Scholar
  44. Hickel, J. (2017). The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions. Cornerstone Digital. Open Google Scholar
  45. Hobson, J. M. (2017). A critical-sympathetic introduction to Linklater’s odyssey: Bridge over troubled (Eurocentric?) water. Review of International Studies, 43(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000250 Open Google Scholar
  46. Hofferberth, E., Schmelzer, M., & Durand, C. (2025). Planned Degrowth: Macroeconomic Coordination for Sustainable Degrowth. In J. Groos & C. Sorg (Eds.), Creative Construction: Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond (pp. 247–264). Bristol University Press. Open Google Scholar
  47. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2006). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente (16th ed.). Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  48. Hornborg, A. (2016). Global Magic: Technologies of Appropriation from Ancient Rome to Wall Street. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  49. Hughes, J. G. (2013). Drawing Elias – Sketches from Four Interviews. Human Figurations, 2(2). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0002.207 Open Google Scholar
  50. Hummel, D., Jahn, T., Kramm, J., & Stieß, I. (2024). Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse – Grundbegriff und Denkraum für die Gestaltung von sozial-ökologischen Transformationen. In M. Sonnberger, A. Bleicher, & M. Groß (Eds.), Handbuch Umweltsoziologie (pp. 15–29). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37218-7_1 Open Google Scholar
  51. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality. Harper & Row. Open Google Scholar
  52. IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. 10.59327/IPCC/AR6–9789291691647 Open Google Scholar
  53. Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  54. Jackson, T. (2025). The Care Economy. Polity. Open Google Scholar
  55. Kallis, G. (2019). Limits: Why Malthus Was Wrong and Why Environmentalists Should Care. Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  56. Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025). Post-growth: The science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(1), e62–e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00310-3 Open Google Scholar
  57. Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on Degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 291–316. Open Google Scholar
  58. Kallis, G., Paulson, S., D’Alisa, G., & Demaria, F. (2020). The Case for Degrowth. Polity. Open Google Scholar
  59. Kemp, L., Xu, C., Depledge, J., Ebi, K. L., Gibbins, G., Kohler, T. A., Rockström, J., Scheffer, M., Schellnhuber, H. J., Steffen, W., & Lenton, T. M. (2022). Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(34), e2108146119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119 Open Google Scholar
  60. Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L., & Ehlers, M.-H. (2018). Degrowth and Technology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1619–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147 Open Google Scholar
  61. Keyßer, L., Steinberger, J., & Schmelzer, M. (2025). Economic growth dependencies and imperatives: A review of key theories and their conflicts. Ecological Economics, 238, 108745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108745 Open Google Scholar
  62. Kilminster, R. (2007). Norbert Elias: Post-Philosophical Sociology. Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  63. Kimmerer, R. W. (2020). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions. Open Google Scholar
  64. Komlosy, A. (2014). Arbeit: Eine globalhistorische Perspektive. 13. bis 21. Jahrhundert. Promedia. Open Google Scholar
  65. Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (Eds.). (2019). Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary. Authors Up Front. Open Google Scholar
  66. Lepenies, P. (2013). Die Macht der einen Zahl. Eine politische Geschichte des Bruttoinlandsprodukts. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  67. Liegey, V., Madelaine, S., Ondet, C., Veillot, A.-I., & Ariès, P. (2013). Un projet de décroissance. Manifeste pour une Dotation inconditionnelle d’autonomie. Les éditions Utopia. Open Google Scholar
  68. Livingston, J. (2019). Self-Devouring Growth: A Planetary Parable as Told from Southern Africa. Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  69. Malm, A. (2016). Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. Verso. Open Google Scholar
  70. Mennell, S. (1996). Civilizing and Decivilizing Processes. In The Course of Human History: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  71. Mennell, S. (1998). Norbert Elias: An Introduction. University College Dublin Press. Open Google Scholar
  72. Merchant, C. (1983). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. Harper & Row. Open Google Scholar
  73. Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. E. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  74. Mitchell, T. (2014). Economentality: How the Future Entered Government. Critical Inquiry, 40(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.1086/676417 Open Google Scholar
  75. Nelson, A. (Ed.). (2025). Routledge Handbook of Degrowth. Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  76. Nia, E. M. (2003). Zum Begriff des Fortschritts bei Norbert Elias. Shaker. Open Google Scholar
  77. Nixon, R. (2013). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  78. Oliveira, V. M. de. (2021). Hospicing Modernity: Facing Humanity’s Wrongs and the Implications for Social Activism. North Atlantic Books. Open Google Scholar
  79. O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 88(95), 88–95. Open Google Scholar
  80. Osterhammel, J. (2009). Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts / Jürgen Osterhammel. Beck. Open Google Scholar
  81. Parrique, T. (2022). Ralentir ou périr: L’économie de la décroissance. SEUIL. Open Google Scholar
  82. Pineault, E. (2023). A Social Ecology of Capital. Pluto. Open Google Scholar
  83. Quilley, S. (2013). De-Growth Is Not a Liberal Agenda: Relocalisation and the Limits to Low Energy Cosmopolitanism. Environmental Values, 22(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725310 Open Google Scholar
  84. Quilley, S. (2020). Elias in the Anthropocene: Human Nature, Evolution and the Politics of the Great Acceleration (pp. 111–139). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_7 Open Google Scholar
  85. Quilley, S., & Loyal, S. (2005). Eliasian Sociology as a ‘Central Theory’ for the Human Sciences. Current Sociology, 53(5), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392105055021 Open Google Scholar
  86. Radkau, J. (2002). Natur und Macht: Eine Weltgeschichte der Umwelt. C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar
  87. Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Gregg, J. W., Rockström, J., Mann, M. E., Oreskes, N., Lenton, T. M., Rahmstorf, S., Newsome, T. M., Xu, C., Svenning, J.-C., Pereira, C. C., Law, B. E., & Crowther, T. W. (2024). The 2024 state of the climate report: Perilous times on planet Earth. BioScience, biae087. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae087 Open Google Scholar
  88. Rosa, H. (2013). Beschleunigung und Entfremdung: Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  89. Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  90. Salleh, A. (2017). Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx, and the Postmodern. Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  91. Saramago, A. (2023). Dualism and Anti-Dualism in the Anthropocene: Process Sociology and Human/Nature Relations in the Great Evolution. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 48(1), 190–212. Open Google Scholar
  92. Scheidler, F. (2020). The End of the Megamachine: A Brief History of a Failing Civilization. Zero Books. Open Google Scholar
  93. Schmelzer, M. (2015a). ‘Expandiere oder stirb.’ Wachstumsziele, die OECD und die Steigerungslogik wirtschaftlicher Expansion. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 41(3), 355–393. Open Google Scholar
  94. Schmelzer, M. (2015b). The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship. Ecological Economics, 118, 262–271. Open Google Scholar
  95. Schmelzer, M. (2016). The Hegemony of Growth. The OECD and the Making of the Economic Growth Paradigm. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  96. Schmelzer, M. (2024). ‘Without Growth, Everything is Nothing’: On the Origins of Growthism. In L. Eastwood & K. Heron (Eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth (pp. 26–40). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110778359 Open Google Scholar
  97. Schmelzer, M., & Büttner, M. (2024). Fossil mentalities: How fossil fuels have shaped social imaginaries. Geoforum, 150, 103981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.103981 Open Google Scholar
  98. Schmelzer, M., & Hofferberth, E. (2023). Democratic Planning for Degrowth. Monthly Review, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-075-03-2023-07_10 Open Google Scholar
  99. Schmelzer, M., & Nowshin, T. (2023). Ecological Reparations and Degrowth: Towards a Convergence of Alternatives Around World-making After Growth. Development, 66, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-023-00360-9 Open Google Scholar
  100. Schmelzer, M., Vetter, A., & Vansintjan, A. (2022). The Future is Degrowth: A Guide to a World Beyond Capitalism. Verso. Open Google Scholar
  101. Schröter, M., & Elias, N. (2004). Gesammelte Schriften in 19 Bänden: Band 9: Über die Zeit. Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  102. Sommer, B., & Welzer, H. (2014). Transformationsdesign. Wege in eine zukunftsfähige Moderne. Oekom. Open Google Scholar
  103. Stay Grounded. (2019). Degrowth of Aviation: Reducing Air Travel in a Just Way. Stay Grounded. https://stay-grounded.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Degrowth-Of-Aviation_2019.pdf Open Google Scholar
  104. Szeman, I., & Boyer, D. (2017). Energy Humanities: An Anthology. JHU Press. Open Google Scholar
  105. Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. Vintage. Open Google Scholar
  106. Treibel, A. (2008). Die Soziologie von Norbert Elias: Eine Einführung in Ihre Geschichte, Systematik und Perspektiven. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  107. van Krieken, R. (1999). The barbarism of civilization: Cultural genocide and the ‘stolen generations’1. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00297.x Open Google Scholar
  108. Van Krieken, R. (2001). Norbert Elias and Process Sociology. In G. Ritzer & B. Smart, Handbook of Social Theory (pp. 353–368). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608351.n27 Open Google Scholar
  109. van Krieken, R. (2024). The Age of Anger and Social Media: Elias, Technology, Civilizing/Decivilizing Processes and Ressentiment. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(7–8), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241299767 Open Google Scholar
  110. Vetter, A. (2023). Konviviale Technik: Empirische Technikethik für eine Postwachstumsgesellschaft. transcript. Open Google Scholar
  111. Vogel, J., & Hickel, J. (2023). Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO2–GDP decoupling in high-income countries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(9), e759–e769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00174-2 Open Google Scholar
  112. Vries, B. D., & Goudsblom, J. (Eds.). (2002). Mappae Mundi: Humans and Their Habitats in a Long-Term Socio-Ecological Perspective : Myths, Maps and Models. Amsterdam University Press. Open Google Scholar
  113. Weber, M. (1920). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. In M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie (pp. 1–206). J.C.B. Mohr. Open Google Scholar
  114. Welzer, H. (2011). Mentale Infrastrukturen: Wie das Wachstum in die Welt und in die Seelen kam (Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Ed.). Heinrich Böll Stiftung. Open Google Scholar
  115. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y Open Google Scholar
  116. Wouters, C. (2014). Universally applicable criteria for doing figurational process sociology: Seven balances, one triad. Human Figurations, 3(1). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0003.106 Open Google Scholar

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Download complete (PDF)

Share via email

Media