Wie enden internationale Sanktionen?

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen Volume 26 (2019), Issue 2
Full access

ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen

Volume 26 (2019), Issue 2

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2019
ISSN-Online
2942-1233
ISSN-Print
0946-7165

Chapter information

Full access

Volume 26 (2019), Issue 2

Wie enden internationale Sanktionen?

Authors:
ISSN-Print
0946-7165
ISSN-Online
2942-1233
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Politics ISSN: 23 (1): 1-18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  2. Andreas, Peter 2005: Criminalizing Consequences of Sanctions. Embargo Busting and Its Legacy, in: International Studies Quarterly 49 (2): 335-360. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  3. Ang, Adrian U-Jin/Peksen, Dursun 2007: When Do Economic Sanctions Work?, in: Political Research Quarterly 60 (1): 135-145. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  4. Bapat, Navin A./Morgan, T. Clifton 2009: Multilateral Versus Unilateral Sanctions Reconsidered. A Test Using New Data, in: International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 1075-94. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  5. Baldwin, David A. 2006: The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice, in; International Security 24 (3): 80-107. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  6. Barnett, Michael/Duvall, Raymond 2005: Power in International Politics, in: International Organization 59 (1): 39-75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  7. Biersteker, Thomas J./Eckert, Sue E. /Tourinho, Marcos 2016: Targeted Sanctions. The Impacts and Effectiveness of United Nations Action, Cambridge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  8. Biersteker, Thomas J./Eckert, Sue E. /Tourinho, Marcos/Hudáková, Zuzana 2018: UN Targeted Sanctions Datasets (1991–2013), in: Journal of Peace Research 55 (3): 404–412. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  9. Blinken, Antony 2015: Full Committee Hearing Iran Nuclear Negotiations. Status of Talks and the Role of Congress, Washington, (D.C.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  10. Bolks, Sean M./Al-Sowayel, Dina 2000: How Long Do Economic Sanctions Last? Examining the Sanctioning Process through Duration, in: Political Research Quarterly 53 (2): 241-265. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  11. Bonetti, Shane 1994: The Persistence and Frequency of Economic Sanctions, in: Chatterji,Manas/Jager, Henk/Rima, Annemarie (Hrsg.): Economics of International Security, London, 183-193. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  12. Bousquet, Antoine/Curtis, Simon 2011: Beyond Models and Metaphors. Complexity Theory, Systems Thinking and International Relations, in: Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24 (1): 43-62. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  13. Brzoska, Michael 2015: International Sanctions Before and Beyond UN Sanctions, in: International Affairs, 91 (6): 1339-1349. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  14. Chan, Stephen/Patel, Hasu 2006: Zimbabwe’s Foreign Policy. A Conversation, in: The Round Table 95(384): 175-190. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  15. Chandler, David 2012: Resilience and Human Security. The Post-Interventionist Paradigm, in: Security Dialogue 43 (3): 213-29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  16. Charron, Andrea/Portela, Clara 2016: The Relationship Between United Nations Sanctions and Regional Sanctions Regimes, in: Biersteker, Thomas J./Eckert, Sue E. /Tourinho, Marcos (Hrsg): Targeted Sanctions: The Impacts and Effectiveness of United Nations Action, Cambridge, 101-118. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  17. Collier, David/Elman, Colin 2008: Qualitative and Multi-Method Research. Organizations, Publication, and Reflections on Integration, in: Box-Steffensmeier Janet M./ Brady, Henry E./ Collier, David (Hrsg.): Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford 780–95. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  18. Council of the European Union 1996: Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 of 22 November 1996 Protecting against the Effects of the Extra-Territorial Application of Legislation Adopted by a Third Country, and Actions Based Thereon or Resulting Therefrom. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  19. Council of the European Union 2002: Council Common Position 2002/145/CFSP of 18 February 2002 Concerning Restrictive Measures against Zimbabwe. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  20. Council of the European Union 2007a: Council Common Position 2007/140/CFSP of 27 February 2007 Concerning Restrictive Measures against Iran. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  21. Council of the European Union 2007b: Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 of 19 April 2007 Concerning Restrictive Measures against Iran. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  22. Council of the European Union 2010: Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 Concerning Restrictive Measures against Iran and Repealing Common Position 2007/140/ CFSP. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  23. Council of the European Union 2012a: Council Decision 2012/35/CFSP of 23 January 2012 Amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP Concerning Restrictive Measures against Iran. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  24. Council of the European Union 2012b: Council Decision 2012/97/CFSP of 17 February 2012 Amending Decision 2011/101/CFSP Concerning Restrictive Measures against Zimbabwe. 2012/97/CFSP. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  25. Council of the European Union 2012c: Council Decision of 7 August 2012 Extending the Validity of Decision 2012/96/EU and Suspending the Application of the Appropriate Measures Set out in Decision 2002/148/EC (2012/470/EU). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  26. Council of the European Union 2012d: Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 Amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP Concerning Restrictive Measures against Iran. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  27. Council of the European Union 2013: Council Regulation (EU) No 298/2013 of 27 March 2013 Amending Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 Concerning Certain Restrictive Measures in Respect of Zimbabwe. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  28. Council of the European Union 2015a: Iran. Suspension of EU Sanctions Extended by One Week. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  29. Council of the European Union 2015b: Iran. Suspension of EU Sanctions Extended. February 21, 2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  30. Council of the European Union 2016: Iran. Declaration by the High Representative on Behalf of the EU on the One Year Anniversary of the JCPOA. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  31. Cox, Dan G./Drury, A. Cooper 2006: Democratic Sanctions. Connecting the Democratic Peace and Economic Sanctions, in: Journal of Peace Research 43 (6): 709-722. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  32. Crawford, Neta C./Klotz, Audie 1999: How Sanctions Work. Lessons from South Africa, New York (NY). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  33. Dashti-Gibson, Jaleh/Davis, Patricia /Radcliff, Benjamin 1997: On the Determinants of the Success of Economic Sanctions. An Empirical Analysis, in; American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 608–18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  34. Department of the Treasury 2015: 31 CFR Part 515 Cuban Assets Control Regulations. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  35. Department of the Treasury 2017: 31 CFR Part 515 Cuban Assets Control Regulations. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  36. Dizaji, Sajjad /van Bergeijk, Peter 2013: Potential Early Phase Success and Ultimate Failure of Economic Sanctions. A VAR Approach with an Application to Iran, in: Journal of Peace Research 50 (6): 721-36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  37. Dorussen, Han/Mo, Jongryn 2001: Ending Economic Sanctions Audience Costs and Rent-Seeking as Commitment Strategies, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (4): 395-426. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  38. Doxey, Margaret P. 1980: Economic Sanctions and International Enforcement, London Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  39. Drezner, Daniel W. 1999: The Sanctions Paradox. Economic Statecraft and International Relations, Cambridge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  40. Drezner, Daniel W. 2000: Bargaining, Enforcement, and Multilateral Sanctions. When Is Cooperation Counterproductive?, in: International Organization 54 (1): 73-102. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  41. Drezner, Daniel W. 2003: The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion, in: International Organization 57 (3): 643-659. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  42. Drury, A. Cooper 1998: Revisiting Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, in: Journal of Peace Research 35 (4): 497-509. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  43. Early, Bryan R. 2011: Unmasking the Black Knights. Sanctions Busters and Their Effects on the Success of Economic Sanctions, in: Foreign Policy Analysis 7 (4): 381-402. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  44. Eaton, Jonathan/Engers, Maxim 1999: Sanctions.Some Simple Analytics, in: American Economic Review 89 (2): 409-14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  45. Elliott, Kimberly/Hufbauer,Gary 1999: Same Song, Same Refrain? Economic Sanctions in the 1990’s, in: American Economic Review 89 (2): 403-8. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  46. E.O. 13288 2003: Executive Order 13288 of March 6, 2003. Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe, Washington (D.C.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  47. E.O. 13716 2016: Executive Order 13716 of January 16, 2016. Revocation of Executive Orders 13574, 13590, 13622, and 13645, Washington (D.C.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  48. E.O. 13846 2018: Executive Order 13846 of August 6, 2018. Reimposing Certain Sanctions With Respect to Iran, Washington (D.C.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  49. E.O. 13846 2018: Executive Order 13846 of August 6, 2018. Reimposing Certain Sanctions With Respect to Iran, Washington (D.C.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  50. Eriksson, Mikael 2007: Targeting the Leadership of Zimbabwe. A Path to Democracy and Normalization?, Uppsala. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  51. Eriksson, Mikael 2016: Targeting Peace. Understanding UN and EU Targeted Sanctions, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  52. Escribà-Folch, Abel/Wright, Joseph 2010: Dealing with Tyranny. International Sanctions and the Survival of Authoritarian Rulers, in; International Studies Quarterly 54 (2): 335-59. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  53. European Commission 2018: Updated Blocking Statute in Support of Iran Nuclear Deal Enters into Force, Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  54. European Parliament 2013: Detention of Human Rights Activists in Zimbabwe. European Parliament Resolution of 7 February 2013 on the Detention of Human Rights Activists in Zimbabwe (2013/2536(RSP)). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  55. European External Action Service 2015: Joint Statement by EU High Representative Federica Mogherini and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, in: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/cuba/3117/joint-statement-by-eu-high-representative-federica-mogherini-and-iranian-foreign-minister-javad-zarif_en; 18.7.2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  56. European External Action Service 2018: Declaration by the High Representative on Behalf of the EU Following US President Trump’s Announcement on the Iran Nuclear Deal (JC-POA), in: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/de/press/press-releases/2018/05/09/declaration-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-eu-following-us-president-trump-s-announcement-on-the-iran-nuclear-deal-jcpoa/; 18.7.2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  57. Fearon, James D. 1994: Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes, in: The American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577-592. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  58. Flyvbjerg, Bent 2006: Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research, in: Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219-45. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  59. Galtung, Johan 1967: On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions. With Examples from the Case of Rhodesia, in: World Politics 19 (3): 378-416. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  60. Giumelli, Francesco 2016: The Success of Sanctions. Lessons Learned from the EU Experience, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  61. Giumelli, Francesco 2011: Coercing, Constraining and Signalling. Explaining UN and EU Sanctions After the Cold War, Colchester. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  62. Grauvogel, Julia/ Licht, Amanda A. /von Soest, Christian 2017: Sanctions and Signals. How International Sanction Threats Trigger Domestic Protest in Targeted Regimes, in: International Studies Quarterly 61 (1): 86-97. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  63. Grauvogel, Julia/von Soest, Christian 2015: Die Verfehlte Sanktionspolitik des Westens gegen Simbabwe, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  64. Grauvogel, Julia/von Soest, Christian 2014: Claims to Legitimacy Count. Why Sanctions Fail to Instigate Democratisation in Authoritarian Regimes, in: European Journal of Political Research 53 (4): 635-653. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  65. Hart, Robert A. 2000: Democracy and the Successful Use of Economic Sanctions, in: Political Research Quarterly 53: 2, 267-284. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  66. Hellquist, Elin 2012: Creating ‘the Self’ by Outlawing ‘the Other’? EU Foreign Policy Sanctions and the Quest for Credibility, Florence. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  67. Hellquist, Elin 2016: Either with Us or against Us? Third-Country Alignment with EU Sanctions against Russia/Ukraine, in: Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (3): 997-1021. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  68. Hellquist, Elin 2017: Sanctions and Contested Normative Authority in Regional and International Affairs, Aarhus. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  69. Hellquist, Elin 2018: Ostracism and the EU’s Contradictory Approach to Sanctions at Home and Abroad, in: Contemporary Politics 2018: 1-26. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  70. Hoekman, Thys 2013: Testing Ties. Opposition and Power-Sharing Negotiations in Zimbabwe, in: Journal of Southern African Studies 39 (4): 903-920. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  71. Hufbauer, Gary C./Schott, Jeffrey J. 1985: Economic Sanctions and US Foreign Policy, in: Political Science & Politics 18 (4): 727-735. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  72. Hufbauer, Gary C./Schott, Jeffrey J. /Elliott, Kimberley A. /Oegg, Barbara 1990: Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 1. Auflage, Washington (D.C.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  73. Jones, Lee 2015: Societies under Sege. Exploring How International Economic Sanctions (Do Not) Work, Oxford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  74. Kaempfer, William H./Lowenberg Anton D. 1992: International Economic Sanctions. A Public Choice Perspective, Boulder (CO). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  75. Krustev, Valentin L. 2010: Strategic Demands, Credible Threats, and Economic Coercion Outcomes, in: International Studies Quarterly 54 (1): 147-174. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  76. Krustev, Valentin L./Morgan, Clifton T. 2011: Ending Economic Coercion. Domestic Politics and International Bargaining, in: Conflict Management and Peace Science 28 (4): 351-376. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  77. Lektzian, David/Souva, Mark 2007: An Institutional Theory of Sanctions Onset and Success, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 51: 6, 848-871. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  78. Lindsay, James M. 1986: Trade Sanctions as Policy Instruments. A Re-Examination, in: International Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 153-173. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  79. Luengo-Cabrera, José/Portela, Clara 2015 : EU Sanctions. Exit Strategies, Paris. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  80. March, James G./Olsen, Johan P. 2011: The Logic of Appropriateness, Oxford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  81. McGillivray, Fiona/Stam, Allan C. 2004: Political Institutions, Coercive Diplomacy, and the Duration of Economic Sanctions, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (2): 154-172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  82. McLean, Elena V./Whang Taehee 2010: Friends or Foes? Major Trading Partners and the Success of Economic Sanctions, in: International Studies Quarterly 54 (2): 427-447. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  83. Morgan, T. Clifton/Bapat, Navin /Kobayashi, Yoshiharu 2014: Threat and Imposition of Economic Sanctions 1945-2005. Updating the TIES Dataset, in: Conflict Management and Peace Science 31 (5): 541-558. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  84. Morgan, T. Clifton/Bapat, Navin /Krustev, Valentin 2009: The Threat and Imposition of Economic Sanctions, 1971-2000, in: Conflict Management and Peace Science 26 (1): 92-110. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  85. Morgan, T. Clifton/Schwebach, Valerie L. 1997: Fools Suffer Gladly. The Use of Economic Sanctions in International Crises, in: International Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 27-50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  86. Nephew, Richard 2018: The Hard Part. The Art of Sanctions Relief, in: The Washington Quarterly, 41 (2): 63-77. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  87. Nooruddin, Irfan 2002: Modeling Selection Bias in Studies of Sanctions Efficacy, in: International Interactions 28 (1): 59-75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  88. Nyakudya, Munyaradzi 2013: Sanctioning the Government of National Unity. A Review of Zimbabwe’s Relations with the West in the Framework of the GPA, in: Raftopoulos, Brian (Hrsg.): The Hard Road to Reform: The Politics of Zimbabwe’s Global Political Agreement, Harare, 171-210. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  89. Obama, Barack 2016: Presidential Policy Directive. United States-Cuba Normalization, Washington (D.C.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  90. Patterson, Ruairi 2013: EU Sanctions on Iran. The European Political Context, in: Middle East Policy 20 (1): 135-146. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  91. Peksen, Dursun 2017: Autocracies and Economic Sanctions. The Divergent Impact of Authoritarian Regime Type on Sanctions Success, in: Defence and Peace Economics 2017: 1-16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  92. Portela, Clara 2010: European Union Sanctions and Foreign Policy. When and Why Do They Work?, London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  93. Portela, Clara/von Soest, Christian 2012: GIGA Sanctions Dataset Codebook, Version 18, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  94. Smith, Alastair 1996: To Intervene or Not to Intervene A Biased Decision, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (1): 16-40. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  95. Soest, Christian von/Michael Wahman 2015: Are Democratic Sanctions Really Counterproductive?, in: Democratization 22 (6): 957-980. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  96. Tabrizi, Aniseh B./Santini, Ruth H. 2012: EU Sanctions against Iran. New Wine in Old Bottles?, in: ISPI Analysis 97: 1-7. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  97. Targeted Sanctions Consortium 2014: UN Targeted Sanctions. Qualitative Database, Geneva. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  98. Tostensen, Arne/Bull, Beate 2002: Are Smart Sanctions Feasible?, in: World Politics 54 (3): 373-403. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  99. United Nations Security Council 1998: Resolution 1192. Adopted by the Security Council at Its 3920th Meeting. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  100. United Nations Security Council 2003: Resolution 1506. Adopted by the Security Council at Its 4820th Meeting (Part II). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  101. United Nations Security Council 2006: Resolution 1737. Adopted by the Security Council at Its 5612th Meeting. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  102. United States Congress 2001: Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act of 2001. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  103. Whang, Taehee/McLean, Elena V. /Kuberski, Douglas W. 2013: Coercion, Information, and the Success of Sanction Threats, in: American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 65-81. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  104. White House 2018: Remarks by President Trump on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Washington (D.C.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  105. Wight, Colin 2002: Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations, in: Handbook of International Relations, 23–51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5
  106. Wood, Reed M. 2008: “A Hand Upon the Throat of the Nation”. Economic Sanctions and State Repression, 1976-2001, in: International Studies Quarterly 52 (3): 489-513. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2019-2-5

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media