Diversität im journalistischen Selbstverständnis. Eine Analyse des Rollenselbst- und -fremdbildes traditioneller und peripherer Akteur*innen im österreichischen Journalismus

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft Volume 73 (2025), Issue 3
Open Access Full access

M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft

Volume 73 (2025), Issue 3


Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2025
ISSN-Online
2942-3317
ISSN-Print
1615-634X

Chapter information


Open Access Full access

Volume 73 (2025), Issue 3

Diversität im journalistischen Selbstverständnis. Eine Analyse des Rollenselbst- und -fremdbildes traditioneller und peripherer Akteur*innen im österreichischen Journalismus


Authors:
ISSN-Print
1615-634X
ISSN-Online
2942-3317


Preview:

Peripheral journalistic actors are increasingly producing and disseminating journalism-like content in digital spaces, blurring journalism’s boundaries. Many of these actors aim to contribute to the diversity of content, perspectives, and representation in public discourse, an ambition often reflected in their role conceptions. However, little is currently known about how the role conceptions of peripheral and traditional journalistic actors differ; how diversity factors into their day-to-day work; and whether these aspects vary across journalistic beats.

This study addresses these questions through 119 qualitative interviews with both peripheral and traditional journalists in Austria, spanning the fields of politics, business, sports, and lifestyle. The findings suggest that differences in role conceptions centred on promoting diversity can function as boundary markers between peripheral and traditional actors, as well as across beats. At the same time, the results indicate that diversity plays a less prominent role in journalistic practice than normative expectations might suggest. These findings offer initial systematic insights into both the self-perceived and externally attributed role conceptions of (peripheral) journalistic actors across beats, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of the role and relevance of diversity in Austrian journalism.

Bibliography


  1. Atton, C. (2002). Alternative media. Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  2. Awad Cherit, I. (2008). Cultural diversity in the news media: A democratic or a commercial need? Javnost – The Public, 15(4), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2008.11008982 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  3. Balluff, P., Eberl, J.-M., Oberhänsli, S. J., Bernhard-Harrer, J., Boomgaarden, H. G., Fahr, A., & Huber, M. (2024). The austrian political advertisement scandal: Patterns of “journalism for sale”. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 0(0), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241285672 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  4. Banjac, S., & Hanusch, F. (2023). The struggle for authority and legitimacy: Lifestyle and political journalists’ discursive boundary work. Journalism, 24(10), 2155–2173. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221125702 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  5. Bertling, C., & Schierl, T. (2020). Sport und Medien. Medienwissen kompakt. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  6. Brantner, C., & Herczeg, P. (2013). ‘The life of a new generation’: Content, values and mainstream media perception of transcultural ethnic media–an Austrian case. Communications-The European Journal of Communication Research, 38(2), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0012 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., Panter, A. T., Rindskopf, D. & Sher, K. J. (eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  8. Carlson, M. (2015). Introduction: The many boundaries of journalism. In Carlson, M. & Lewis, S. C. (eds.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation. (pp. 1–18). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  9. Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  10. Chua, S., & Duffy, A. (2019). Friend, foe or frenemy? Traditional journalism actors’ changing attitudes towards peripheral players and their innovations. Media and Communication, 7(4), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i4.2275 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  11. Eckert, S., & Assmann, K. (2022). The “ProQuote” initiative: women journalists in Germany push to revolutionize newsroom leadership. Feminist Media Studies, 22(5), 1011–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1881984 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  12. Eldridge, S. (2017). Online journalism from the periphery: Interloper media and the journalistic field (1st ed.). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  13. Eldridge, S. (2019). Where do we draw the line? Interlopers, (ant)agonists, and an unbounded journalistic field. Media and Communication, 7(4), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i4.2295 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  14. Evers, T. (2021). Ethnische Diversität. Zentraler Wert einer integrativen journalistischen Öffentlichkeit. Communicatio Socialis (ComSoc), 54(4), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2021-4-446 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  15. Geiger, B. (2023). Feministische Medien und Öffentlichkeit: Zeitschriften der Neuen Frauenbewegungen. In Dorer, J., Geiger, B., Hipfl, B., & Ratković, V. (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medien und Geschlecht (pp. 609–627). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  16. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  17. Hanitzsch, T., & Vos, T. P. (2017). Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive constitution of journalism. Communication theory, 27(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12112 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  18. Hanitzsch, T., & Vos, T. P. (2018). Journalism beyond democracy: A new look into journalistic roles in political and everyday life. Journalism, 19(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488491667338 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  19. Hanitzsch, T., Seethaler, J., & Wyss, V. (Hrsg.), (2019). Journalismus in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  20. Hanusch, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2013). Mediating orientation and self-expression in the world of consumption: Australian and German lifestyle journalists’ professional views. Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 943–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713501931 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  21. Hanusch, F. (2019). Journalistic roles and everyday life: An empirical account of lifestyle journalists’ professional views. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1370977 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  22. Hanusch, F., & Löhmann, K. (2023). Dimensions of peripherality in journalism: A typology for studying new actors in the journalistic field. Digital Journalism, 11(7), 1292–1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2148549 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  23. Harcup, T. (2003). ‘The unspoken – said’. The journalism of alternative media. Journalism, 4(3), 356–376. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  24. Herczeg, P. (2010). Integration durch Kommunikation. Fünf Thesen über den zu führenden kommunikationswissenschaftlichen und gesellschaftlichen Diskurs. In Eberwein, T. & Müller, D. (Hrsg.), Journalismus und Öffentlichkeit. Eine Profession und ihr gesellschaftlicher Auftrag (pp. 169–181). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  25. Herczeg, P. (2021). Das Maß der Würde: Ein Menschenrecht als kommunikative Herausforderung. facultas. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  26. Humprecht, E., & Esser, F. (2017). A glass ceiling in the online age? Explaining the underrepresentation of women in online political news. European Journal of Communication, 32(5), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117720343 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  27. Ihlebæk, K. A., Figenschou, T. U., Eldridge, S. A., Frischlich, L., Cushion, S., & Holt, K. (2022). Understanding alternative news media and its contribution to diversity. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2134165 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  28. Kaltenbrunner, A., Lugschitz, R., Karmasin, M., Luef, S., & Kraus, D. (2020). Der österreichische Journalismus-Report: Eine empirische Erhebung und eine repräsentative Befragung. facultas. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  29. Kaltenbrunner, A., & Lugschitz, M. R. (2021). Diversität und Journalismus. Die Bedeutung von Pluralität in den Medien. Internationale Forschungsansätze und Analysen zur Situation in Österreich. Medienhaus Wien. https://www.mhw.at/uploads/1/4/5/2/145228725/mhw___abschlussbericht_diversit_t_2020_21_1_.pdf [12.08.2025]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  30. Konieczna, M., & Santa Maria, E. (2023). “I can’t be neutral or centrist in a debate over my own humanity”: A study of disagreements between journalists and editors, and what they tell us about objectivity. Journalism Studies, 24(15), 1839–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2247487 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  31. Lichtenstein, D., Herbers, M. R., & Bause, H. (2021). Journalistic YouTubers and their role orientations, strategies, and professionalization tendencies. Journalism Studies, 22(9), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1922302 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  32. Löhmann, K. (2025). Activists for diversity or diverse Journalists? How Austrian peripheral journalistic actors’ role orientations serve as boundary markers. Journalism Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2025.2505945 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  33. Lünenborg, M., & Maier, T. (2017). Wir und die Anderen? Eine Analyse der Bildberichterstattung deutschsprachiger Printmedien zu den Themen Flucht, Migration und Integration. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  34. Lünenborg, M., & Medeiros, D. (2021). Redaktionen dekolonisieren! Journalismus für die Einwanderungsgesellschaft. In Dilger, H. & Warstat, M. (Hrsg.), Umkämpfte Vielfalt. Affektive Dynamiken institutioneller Diversifizierung (pp. 95–115). Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  35. Lünenborg, M. & Weiß, A. (2025). Diversität im Journalismus - eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. In Hanitzsch, T., Sehl, A. & Loosen, W. (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismusforschung. Nomos Verlag Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  36. Malik, S. (2014) Diversity, broadcasting and the politics of representation. In Horsti, K., Hultén, G., & Titley, G. (eds.), National Conversations: Public Service Media and Cultural Diversity in Europe (pp. 40–41).Intellect Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  37. Maares, P., & Hanusch, F. (2020). Exploring the boundaries of journalism: Instagram micro-bloggers in the twilight zone of lifestyle journalism. Journalism, 21(2), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918801400 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  38. Maares, P., & Hanusch, F. (2023). Understanding peripheral journalism from the boundary: A conceptual framework. Digital Journalism, 11(7), 1270–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2134045 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  39. Maares, P., Löhmann, K., & Nölleke, D. (Sept. 14–15, 2023). Of TikTokers, team media, finance gurus, and the party press: Exploring membership claims of non-traditional journalistic actors [Konferenzbeitrag]. Future of Journalism Conference, Cardiff, UK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  40. McNair, B. (2017). After objectivity? Schudson’s sociology of journalism in the era of post-factuality. Journalism Studies, 18(10), 1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1347893 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  41. McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail's mass communication theory. Sage publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  42. Neuberger, C., Nuernbergk, C., & Rischke, M. (2009). Journalismus im Internet: Zwischen Profession, Partizipation und Technik. Media Perspektiven, 4(2009), 174–188. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  43. Nölleke, D., Hanusch, F., Maares, P., & Löhmann, K. (2025). Periphere Akteure. In Hanitzsch, T., Sehl, A. & Loosen, W. (Hrsg.), Journalismusforschung. Nomos Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  44. Örnebring, H., & Karlsson, M. (2022). Journalistic autonomy: The genealogy of a concept. University of Missouri Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  45. Rädiker, S., & Kuckartz, U. (2019). Analyse qualitativer Daten mit MAXQDA. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  46. Schmidt, T. R. (2024). Challenging journalistic objectivity: How journalists of color call for a reckoning. Journalism, 25(3), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231160997 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  47. Singer, J. B. (2015). Out of bounds Professional norms as boundary markers. In Carlson, M. & Lewis, S. C. (eds.), Boundaries of Journalism (pp. 21–36). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  48. Schaffrath, M. (2010). Vermittler, Vermarkter und Verkäufer. Empirische Studie zum beruflichen Selbstverständnis von TV-Sportjournalisten. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 58(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2010-2-247 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  49. Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  50. Strauß, N. (2022). Covering sustainable finance: Role perceptions, journalistic practices and moral dilemmas. Journalism, 23(6), 1194–1212. https://doi.org /10.1177/14648849211001784 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  51. Van Dalen, A., de Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2012). Different roles, different content? A four-country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting style of political journalists. Journalism, 13(7), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431538 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  52. Viererbl, B., & Koch, T. (2024). Is a brand journalist just another journalist? Examining differences and similarities in the self-perceptions of their professional roles and ethical orientations. Journalism Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2318257 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  53. Willnat, L., Weaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (2019). The American journalist in the digital age. How journalists and the public think about journalism in the United States. Journalism Studies, 20(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1387071 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424
  54. Wollin-Giering, S., Hoffmann, M., Höfting, J., & Ventzke, C. (2024). Automatic transcription of English and German qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-25.1.4129 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-424

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex