News softening as a strategy for adapting to platform logics. Introducing the concept of social news softening.

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Volume 15 (2026), Issue 1
Open Access Full access

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Volume 15 (2026), Issue 1

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2026
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 15 (2026), Issue 1

News softening as a strategy for adapting to platform logics. Introducing the concept of social news softening.

Authors:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
Preview:

News softening describes a journalistic strategy to attract maximum attention with the help of certain content (soft news) or a soft style – a goal also included in the (algorithm-based) logics of social platforms. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence on the extent to which adapting news media to social media logic is accompanied by news softening, particularly due to the lack of a conceptual basis. The traditional softening concept (Reinemann et al., 2012), developed based on mass media logic and not considering social media-specific softening aspects, cannot be applied to social platforms without running the risk of underestimating the actual degree of news softening. For this reason, this paper develops the concept of “social news softening” based on the conceptualization of social media logic by Hermida and Mellado (2020), from which it derives adaptation strategies. The new concept includes five dimensions – emotionality, subjectivity, individualization framing, sensational framing, and audience orientation – and can be understood as a conceptual extension of the traditional concept, supplementing its dimensions and characteristics (many of which are still relevant to social media) with social media-specific ones. In addition, this paper provides considerations on how platform-specific affordances impact social news softening on distinct platforms. Thus, this paper is an important starting point for urgently needed empirical studies on news softening in the context of platformization processes and the adaptation of news media to the logics of social media. Therefore, this paper links softening research with current issues in journalism and media performance research.

Bibliography

  1.   Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  2. Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  3. Wunderlich, L., Hölig, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2022). Does journalism still matter? The role of journalistic and non-journalistic sources in young peoples’ news related practices. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(3), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 19401612211072547 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  4. Wojcieszak, M., Menchen-Trevino, E., Goncalves, J. F. F., & Weeks, B. (2022). Avenues to news and diverse news exposure online: Comparing direct navigation, social media, news aggregators, search queries, and article hyperlinks. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 860–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211009160 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  5. Wirz, D. S., Zai, F., Vogler, D., Urman, A., & Eisenegger, M. (2023). Die Qualität von ­Schweizer Medien auf Instagram und TikTok [The quality of Swiss media on Instagram and TikTok]. In fög – Forschungszentrum Öffentlichkeit und Gesellschaft/Universität Zürich (Ed.), Jahrbuch Qualität der Medien 2023 (pp. 47–61). Schwabe. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  6. Wirz, D., & Zai, F. (2024). Politischer Journalismus auf Instagram: Informations- und Unterhaltungspotenzial Schweizer Nachrichtenmedien [Political journalism on Instagram: Information and entertainment potential of Swiss news media] In C. Nuernbergk, N. F. Schumacher, J. Haßler, & J. Schützeneder (Hrsg.), Politischer Journalismus: Konstellationen - Muster - Dynamiken (pp. 259–276). Nomos https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748939702-259 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  7. Welbers, K., & Opgenhaffen, M. (2019). Presenting news on social media. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1493939 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  8. Weiß, R., Magin, M., Hasebrink, U., Jandura, O., Seethaler, J., & Stark, B. (2016). Publizistische Qualität im medialen Wandel – eine normativ begründete Standortbestimmung [Journalistic quality in a shifting media landscape – a normative standpoint]. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung – Gerechtigkeit – Öffentlichkeit: Normativität in den Medien und in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 27–49). UVK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  9. Walters, P. (2022). Reclaiming control: How journalists embrace social media logics while defending journalistic values. Digital Journalism, 10(9), 1482–1501. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1942113 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  10. Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Schmidt, T. R. (2019). News and storytelling. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 261–276). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  11. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315193434-6 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  12. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). The emotional architecture of social media. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self and platforms, stories, connections (pp. 77–93). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  13. Vermeer, S., Trilling, D., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. (2020). Online news user journeys: The role of social media, news websites, and topics. Digital Journalism, 8(9), 1114–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1767509 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  14. Vázquez-Herrero, J., Negreira-Rey, M.-C., & Rodríguez-Vázquez, A.-I. (2021). Intersections between TikTok and TV: Channels and programmes thinking outside the box. Journalism and Media, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2010001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  15. Vázquez-Herrero, J., Negreira-Rey, M.-C., & López-García, X. (2022). Let’s dance the news! How the news media are adapting to the logic of TikTok. Journalism, 23(8), 1717–1735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920969092 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  16. Vázquez-Herrero, J., Direito-Rebollal, S., & López-García, X. (2019). Ephemeral journalism: News distribution through Instagram stories. Social Media + Society, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119888657 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  17. Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  18. Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  19. Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 13(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  20. Trilling, D., Tolochko, P., & Burscher, B. (2017). From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: How to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654682 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  21. Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  22. Tenenboim, O. (2023). Media production logics in triple-party news-spaces: A five-dimensional framework. Digital Journalism, 11(7), 1250–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2105244 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  23. Tenenboim, O. (2020). News engagement logics: Examining practices of media outlets and their audiences on social networking sites [Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/85419/TENENBOIM-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  24. Steiner, M. (2020). Soft presentation of hard news? A content analysis of political Facebook posts. Media and Communication, 8(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3152 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  25. Sparks, C. (2000). Introduction: The panic over tabloid news. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 1–40). Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  26. Simon, F. M. (2022). Uneasy bedfellows: AI in the news, platform companies and the issue of journalistic autonomy. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1832–1854. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2063150 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  27. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  28. Sehl, A., Eder, M., & Kretzschmar, S. (2022). Journalismus auf Instagram: Qualität neu definiert? [Journalism on Instagram: Redefining (news) quality?] In J. Schützeneder & M. Graßl (Eds.), Journalismus und Instagram (pp. 45–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34603-4_4 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  29. Scott, K. (2021). You won’t believe what’s in this paper! Clickbait, relevance and the curiosity gap. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.023 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  30. Schneiders, P., & Stark, B. (2025). Ensuring news quality in platformized news ecosystems: Shortcomings and recommendations for an epistemic governance. Media and Communication, 13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.10042 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  31. Schellewald, A. (2023). Understanding the popularity and affordances of TikTok through user experiences. Media, Culture & Society, 45(8), 1568–1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221144562 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  32. Salgado, S., & Bobba, G. (2019). News on events and social media: A comparative analysis of Facebook users’ reactions. Journalism Studies, 20(15), 2258–2276. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1586566 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  33. Russmann, U., & Svensson, J. (2017). Introduction to visual communication in the age of social media: Conceptual, theoretical and methodological challenges. Media and Communication, 5(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i4.1263 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  34. Ronzhyn, A., Cardenal, A. S., & Rubio, A. B. (2023). Defining affordances in social media research: A literature review. New Media & Society, 25(11), 3165–3188. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135187 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  35. Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S., & Legnante, G. (2012). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427803 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  36. Rashidian, N., Tsiveriotis, G., Brown, P., Bell, E., & Hartstone, A. (2020). Platforms and publishers: The end of an era. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-sc1s-2j58 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  37. Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & Van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  38. Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & Duffy, B. E. (2023). Spaces of negotiation: Analyzing platform power in the news industry. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2103011 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  39. Peterson-Salahuddin, C., & Diakopoulos, N. (2020). Negotiated autonomy: The role of social media algorithms in editorial decision making. Media and Communication, 8(3), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  40. Otto, L., Glogger, I., & Boukes, M. (2017). The softening of journalistic political communication: A comprehensive framework model of sensationalism, soft news, infotainment, and tabloidization. Communication Theory, 27(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12102 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  41. Örnebring, H., & Jönsson, A. M. (2004). Tabloid journalism and the public sphere: A historical perspective on tabloid journalism. Journalism Studies, 5(3), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000246052 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  42. Newman, N., Ross Arguedas, A., Robertson, C. T., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R (2025). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  43. Newman, N. (2022). How publishers are learning to create and distribute news on TikTok. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/how-publishers-are-learning-create-and-distribute-news-tiktok Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  44. Negreira-Rey, M.-C., Vázquez-Herrero, J., & López-García, X. (2022). Blurring boundaries between journalists and TikTokers: Journalistic role performance on TikTok. Media and Communication, 10(1), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4699 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  45. Meier-Vieracker, S. (2025). Überschreibungen: Multimodale Metaphern auf TikTok [Overwritings: Multimodal metaphors on TikTok]. In F. Fischer, S. Meier-Vieracker, & L. Niendorf (Eds.), TikTok–Memefication und Performance (pp. 47–66). J. B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-70712-8_3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  46. Magin, M. (2019). Attention, please! Structural influences on tabloidization of campaign coverage in German and Austrian elite newspapers (1949–2009). Journalism, 20(12), 1704–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917707843 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  47. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  48. Lischka, J. A., & Garz, M. (2023). Clickbait news and algorithmic curation: A game theory framework of the relation between journalism, users, and platforms. New Media & Society, 25(8), 2073–2094. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027174 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  49. Lischka, J. A. (2021). Logics in social media news making: How social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism, 22(2), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918788472 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  50. Lewis, S. C., & Molyneux, L. (2018). A decade of research on social media and journalism: Assumptions, blind spots, and a way forward. Media and Communication, 6(4), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  51. Lefkowitz, J. (2018). “Tabloidization” or dual-convergence: Quoted speech in tabloid and “quality” British newspapers 1970–2010. Journalism Studies, 19(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1190662 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  52. Lee, A. Y, Mieczkowski, H., Ellison, N. B., & Hancook, J. T. (2022). The algorithmic crystal: Conceptualizing the self through algorithmic personalization on TikTok [Conference paper]. CSCW 22, Taipei, Taiwan Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  53. Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  54. Lamot, K., Kreutz, T., & Opgenhaffen, M. (2022). “We rewrote this title”: How news headlines are remediated on Facebook and how this affects engagement. Social Media + Society, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221114827 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  55. Lamot, K. (2022). What the metrics say: The softening of news on the Facebook pages of mainstream media outlets. Digital Journalism, 10(4), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1974917 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  56. Klein, M., Magin, M., Riedl, A. A., Udris, L., & Stark, B. (2025). From news softening to social news softening: Comparing patterns of political news coverage on different (social) media channels in Germany and Switzerland. Digital Journalism, 13(6), 1089–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2278044 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  57. Keyling, T. (2017). Kollektives Gatekeeping. Die Herstellung von Publizität in Social Media [Collective gatekeeping: The creation of visibility on social media]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16686-1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  58. Kaye, D. B. V., Zeng, J., & Wikström, P. (2022). TikTok: Creativity and culture in short video. Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  59. Karlsson, M. B. (2016). Goodbye politics, hello lifestyle: Changing news topics in tabloid, quality and local newspaper websites in the U.K. and Sweden from 2002 to 2012. Observatorio, 10(4), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS1042016940 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  60. Jandura, O., & Friedrich, K. (2014). The quality of political media coverage. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Political communication (pp. 351–374). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238174.351 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  61. Hermida, A., & Mellado, C. (2020). Dimensions of social media logics: Mapping forms of journalistic norms and practices on Twitter and Instagram. Digital Journalism, 8(7), 864–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1805779 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  62. Hendrickx, J., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2024). Dissecting social media journalism: A comparative study across platforms, outlets and countries. Journalism Studies, 25(9), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2324318 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  63. Hendrickx, J. (2025). News #foryou on TikTok: A digital methods-based study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251328623 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  64. Hendrickx, J. (2023). The rise of social journalism: An explorative case study of a youth-oriented Instagram news account. Journalism Practice, 17(8), 1810–1825. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2012500 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  65. Hase, V., Boczek, K., & Scharkow, M. (2023). Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1499–1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2128389 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  66. Haim, M., Karlsson, M., Ferrer-Conill, R., Kammer, A., Elgesem, D., & Sjøvaag, H. (2021). You should read this study! It investigates Scandinavian social media logics ☝. Digital Journalism, 9(4), 406–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1886861 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  67. Hågvar, Y. B. (2019). News media’s rhetoric on Facebook. Journalism Practice, 13(7), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1577163 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  68. Gruber, A., & Radü, J. (2022). Die Story-Funktion als Experimentierfeld für journalistische Innovation: Digitales Storytelling auf Instagram am Beispiel des SPIEGEL [The story feature as a field of experimentation for journalistic innovation: Digital storytelling on Instagram using the media outlet SPIEGEL as an example]. In J. Schützeneder & M. Graßl (Eds.), Journalismus und Instagram (pp. 259–270). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34603-4_17 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  69. Godulla, A., & Wolf, C. (2018). Digitales Storytelling: Nutzererwartungen, Usability, Produktionsbedingungen und Präsentation [Digital storytelling: User expectations, usability, production conditions and presentation]. In C. Nuernbergk & C. Neuberger (Eds.), Journalismus im Internet (pp. 81–100). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93284-2_3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  70. Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). #Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  71. García-Perdomo, V., Salaverría, R., Brown, D. K., & Harlow, S. (2018). To share or not to share: The influence of news values and topics on popular social media content in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina. Journalism Studies, 19(8), 1180–1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  72. Ferrer-Conill, R., & Tandoc, E. C. (2018). The audience-oriented editor: Making sense of the audience in the newsroom. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1440972 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  73. Esser, F. (2013). Mediatization as a challenge: Media logic versus political logic. In H. Kriesi, S. Lavenex, F. Esser, J. Matthes, M. Bühlmann, & D. Bochsler (Eds.), Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization (pp. 155–176). Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  74. Esser, F. (1999). ‘Tabloidization’ of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323199014003001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  75. Eisenegger, M. (2021). Dritter, digitaler Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit als Folge der Plattformisierung [Third, digital transformation of the public sphere as a result of platformization]. In M. Eisenegger, M. Prinzing, P. Ettinger, & R. Blum (Eds.), Digitaler Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit (pp. 17–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32133-8_2 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  76. Dvir-Gvirsman, S., Sude, D., & Raisman, G. (2024). Unpacking news engagement through the perceived affordances of social media: A cross-platform, cross-country approach. New Media & Society, 26(11), 6487–6509. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231154432. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  77. Dvir-Gvirsman, S., & Tsuriel, K. (2022). In an open relationship: Platformization of relations between news practitioners and their audiences. Journalism Studies, 23(11), 1308–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2084144 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  78. Duckwitz, A. (2019). Influencer als digitale Meinungsführer: Wie Influencer in sozialen Medien den politischen Diskurs beeinflussen – und welche Folgen das für die demokratische Öffentlichkeit hat [Influencers as digital opinion leaders: How influencers shape political discourse in social media – and what consequences this has for the democratic public sphere]. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. https://collections.fes.de/publikationen/ident/fes/15736 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  79. De León, E., & Trilling, D. (2021). A sadness bias in political news sharing? The role of discrete emotions in the engagement and dissemination of political news on Facebook. Social Media + Society, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211059710 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  80. Costera Meijer, I. (2020). Understanding the audience turn in journalism: From quality discourse to innovation discourse as anchoring practices 1995–2020. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2326–2342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1847681 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  81. Cheng, Z., & Li, Y. (2024). Like, comment, and share on TikTok: Exploring the effect of sentiment and second-person view on the user engagement with TikTok news videos. Social Science Computer Review, 42(1), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393231178603 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  82. Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). SAGE. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  83. Brown, D. K., Harlow, S., García-Perdomo, V., & Salaverría, R. (2018). A new sensation? An international exploration of sensationalism and social media recommendations in online news publications. Journalism, 19(11), 1497–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1464884916683549 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  84. Blom, J. N., & Hansen, K. R. (2015). Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  85. Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2022). The “audience logic” in digital journalism: An exploration of shifting news logics across media types and time. Journalism Studies, 23(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2000339 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  86. Berg, H. (2018). Wissenschaftsjournalismus zwischen Elfenbeinturm und Boulevard: Eine Langzeitanalyse der Wissenschaftsberichterstattung deutscher Zeitungen [Science journalism at the crossroads between ivory tower and boulevard: A long-term analysis of science journalism in German newspapers]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21157-8 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  87. Bell, E. (2021). Do technology companies care about journalism? In A. Schiffrin (Ed.), Media capture: How money, digital platforms, and governments control the news (pp. 291–296). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/schi18882-017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  88. Belair-Gagnon, V., Zamith, R., & Holton, A. E. (2020). Role orientations and audience metrics in newsrooms: An examination of journalistic perceptions and their drivers. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1709521 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  89. Bastos, M. T. (2016). Digital journalism and tabloid journalism. In B. Franklin & S. A. Eldridge (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital journalism studies (pp. 217–225). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713793-22 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  90. Arbaoui, B., De Swert, K., & van der Brug, W. (2020). Sensationalism in news coverage: A comparative study in 14 television systems. Communication Research, 47(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216663364 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  91. Anter, L. (2025). How social media affordances shape journalistic content production: A stimulus-based interview study on journalists’ perceptions. Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251337009 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  92. Anter, L. (2024). How news organizations coordinate, select, and edit content for social media platforms: A systematic literature review. Journalism Studies, 25(9), 1095–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2235428 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45
  93. Adam, S., & Maier, M. (2010). Personalization of politics: A critical review and agenda for research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 34(1), 213–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2026-1-45

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Full download (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media