Was Ratingagenturen von Staaten fordern

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift Volume 55 (2014), Edition 4
Full access

Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft

Volume 55 (2014), Edition 4

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Publication year
2014
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
ISSN-Print
0032-3470

Chapter information

Full access

Volume 55 (2014), Edition 4

Was Ratingagenturen von Staaten fordern

Authors:
ISSN-Print
0032-3470
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Afonso, António, Pedro Gomes, und Philipp Rother. 2011a. Short-and long-run determinants of sovereign debt credit ratings. International Journal of Finance & Economics 16: 1-15. DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.416. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.416
  2. Afonso, António, Davide Furceri, und Pedro Gomes. 2011b. Sovereign credit ratings and financial markets linkages: application to European data. Technical University of ­Lisbon Economics Working Paper WP 14/2011/DE/UECE. Lissabon: Technical University of Lisbon. Open Google Scholar
  3. Arbatli, Elif, und Julio Escolano. 2012. Fiscal Transparency, Fiscal Performance and Credit Ratings. IMF Working Paper WP/12/156. Washington, D. C.: IWF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5089/9781475504477.001
  4. Archer, Candace C., Glen Biglaiser, und Karl DeRouen Jr. 2007. Sovereign Bonds and the “Democratic Advantage”: Does Regime Type Affect Credit Rating Agency Ratings in the Developing World? International Organization 61 (Spring 2007): 341-365. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818307070129. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070129
  5. Bank of England. 2010. Bank of England Market Notice: Sterling Monetary Framework: Clarification on Collateral Eligibility and Haircuts, 10 May 2010. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/Documents/marketnotice100510a.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  6. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  7. Bank of Japan. 2013. Collateral Guidelines on Eligible Foreign Bonds. http://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/measures/term_cond/yoryo46.htm/#table. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  8. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2004. Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: a Revised Framework. http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.htm. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  9. Beaulieu, Emily, Gary W. Cox, und Sebastian Saiegh. 2012. Sovereign Debt and Regime Type: Reconsidering the Democratic Advantage. International Organization 66: 709-738. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818312000288. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000288
  10. Bernhard, William, und David Leblang. 2006. Democratic Processes and Financial Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607226.001
  11. Biglaiser, Glen, und Karl DeRouen. 2007. Sovereign Bond Ratings and Neoliberalism in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly 51: 121-138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468- Open Google Scholar
  12. 2478.2007.00442.x. Open Google Scholar
  13. Biglaiser, Glen, und Joseph L. Staats. 2012. Finding the “Democratic Advantage” in Sovereign Bond Ratings: The Importance of Strong Courts, Property Rights Protection, and the Rule of Law. International Organization 66: 515-535. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818312000185. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000185
  14. Borensztein, Eduardo, und Ugo Panizza. 2008. The Costs of Sovereign Default. IMF Staff Papers 56: 683-741. Washington, D. C.: IWF. DOI: 10.1057/imfsp.2009.21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2009.21
  15. Brune, Nancy, Geoffrey Garrett, und Bruce Kogut. 2004. The International Monetary Fund and the Global Spread of Privatization. IMF Staff Papers 51: 195-220. Washington, D. C.: IWF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5089/9781451836806.002
  16. Bruner, Christopher M., und Rawi Abdelal. 2005. To Judge Leviathan: Sovereign Credit Ratings, National Law, and the World Economy. Journal of Public Policy 25: 191-217. Open Google Scholar
  17. Cantor, Richard, und Frank Packer. 1996. Determinants and Impact of Sovereign Credit Ratings. FRBNY Economic Policy Review 6: 37-54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1028774
  18. Cantor, Richard. 2004. An Introduction to Recent Research on Credit Ratings. Journal of Banking and Finance 28: 2565-2573. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.002
  19. Cantor, Richard, Owain Ap Gwilym, und Stephen Thomas. 2007. The Use of Credit Ratings in the U.S. and Europe. Journal of Fixed Income Fall: 13-26. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.996133. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.996133
  20. Caraway, Teri, Stephanie Rickard, und Mark Anner. 2012. International Negotiations and Domestic Politics: The Case of IMF Labor Market Conditionality. International Organization 66: 27-61. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818311000348. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818311000348
  21. Clegg, Liam. 2012. Global governance behind closed doors: The IMF boardroom, the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, and the intersection of material power and norm stabilisation in global politics. The Review of International Organizations 7: 285-308. DOI: 10.1007/s11558-011-9133-6. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11558-011-9133-6
  22. Cordes, Till. 2014. The Political Economy of Sovereign Rating Criteria: What Rating Agencies Demand from National Governments. Dissertation. Berlin: Hertie School of Governance. Open Google Scholar
  23. Datz, Giselle. 2004. Reframing development and accountability: the influence of sovereign credit ratings on policy making in developing countries. Third World Quarterly 25: 303-318. DOI: 10.1080/0143659042000174824. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000174824
  24. Dreher, Axel, und Stefan Voigt. 2011. Does Membership in International Organizations Increase Governments’ Credibility? Testing the Effects of Delegating Powers. Journal of Comparative Economics 39: 326-348. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2011.04.003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2011.04.003
  25. DW World. 2011. EU criticizes role of US credit rating agencies in debt crisis. http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,15225330,00.html. Zugegriffen: 20.10.2011. Open Google Scholar
  26. Enderlein, Henrik, Christoph Trebesch, und Laura von Daniels. 2012. Sovereign debt disputes: A database on government coerciveness during debt crises. Journal of International Money and Finance 31: 250-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.11.011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.11.011
  27. European Central Bank. 2013. Eurosystem credit assessment framework (ECAF). http://www.ecb.int/paym/coll/risk/ecaf/html/index.en.html. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  28. Federal Reserve. 2013. Federal Reserve Discount Window and Payment System Risk Collateral Margins Table. www.frbdiscountwindow.org/discountmargins.xls. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  29. Ferri, Giovanni, Li-Gang Liu, und Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1999. The Procyclical Role of Rating Agencies: Evidence from the East Asian Crisis. Economic Notes 28: 335-355. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-0300.00016
  30. Financial Stability Board. 2012. Roadmap and workshop for reducing reliance on CRA ratings FSB report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, 5 November 2012. http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/list/fsb_pa/tid_167/index.htm. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  31. Financial Times. 2012a. Greeks shift focus from debt to politics. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/fcb20f6e-6b9d-11e1-8337-00144feab49a.html#axzz1qQJLtB00. Zugegriffen: 30.03.2012. Open Google Scholar
  32. Financial Times. 2012b. Dancing around Athens’ default. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0a2fb9f8-58a6-11e1-9f28-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1qQJLtB00. Zugegriffen: 30.03.2012. Open Google Scholar
  33. Financial Times. 2013. Gulf states bemoan lack of top-grade ratings. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/5124033e-9c73-11e2-ba3c-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=published_links%2Frss%2Fmarkets%2Ffeed%2F%2Fproduct#axzz2PUPF34rA. Open Google Scholar
  34. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  35. Financial Times. 2014. Italy accuses S&P of not getting ‘la dolce vita’. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6ed9649e-8dab-11e3-bbe7-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=intl#axzz2sp0DdCuu. Zugegriffen: 22.02.2014. Open Google Scholar
  36. Fitch Ratings. 2012. Sovereign Rating Criteria, Master Criteria, 13 August 2012. http://www.fitchratings.com. Zugegriffen: 30.12.2013. Open Google Scholar
  37. Fitch Ratings. 2013. About Us. https://www.fitchratings.com/web/en/dynamic/about-us/about-us.jsp. Zugegriffen: 30.12.2013. Open Google Scholar
  38. Fitch Ratings. 2014. Sector: Sovereigns. https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/sector/overview/sovereigns. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  39. Fratzscher, Marcel, und Julien Reynaud. 2010. IMF Surveillance and Financial Markets - A Political Economy Analysis. CESIFO Working Paper 3089. München: Center for Economic Studies/ifo-Institut. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.01.002. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.01.002
  40. Fuchs, Andreas, und Kai Gehring. 2013. The Home Bias in Sovereign Ratings. University of Heidelberg Department of Economics Discussion Paper: 552. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2370374. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2370374
  41. Gaillard, Norbert. 2009. Fitch, Moody’s and S&P’s Sovereign Ratings and EMBI Global Spreads: Lessons from 1993-2007. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics: 41-59. Open Google Scholar
  42. Gaillard, Norbert. 2012. A Century of Sovereign Ratings. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0523-8_8
  43. Hameed, Farhan. 2005. Fiscal Transparency and Economic Outcomes. IMF Working Paper WP/05/225. Washington, D. C.: IWF. Open Google Scholar
  44. Heuser, Annette. 2013. (Non-) Profiting From Better Sovereign Ratings. http://www.­bertelsmann-stiftung.de/cps/rde/xchg/bst_engl/hs.xsl/nachrichten_115958.htm. Zuge­griffen: 05.09.2014. Open Google Scholar
  45. Internationaler Währungsfonds. 2003. Access to International Capital Markets for First-Time Sovereign Issuers. http://www.imf.org/external/np/icm/2003/eng/111703.pdf. Zugegriffen: 21.08.2010. Open Google Scholar
  46. Internationaler Währungsfonds. 2010. Global Financial Stability Report: Sovereigns, Funding, and Systemic Liquidity. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2010/02/. Zugegriffen: 03.06.2013. Open Google Scholar
  47. Internationaler Währungsfonds. 2013. Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSCs). http://www.imf.org/external/NP/rosc/rosc.aspx. Zugegriffen: 03.06.2013. Open Google Scholar
  48. Jaramillo, Laura. 2010. Determinants of Investment Grade Status in Emerging Markets. IMF Working Paper WP/10/117. Washington, D. C.: IWF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5089/9781455200764.001
  49. Jaramillo, Laura, und Catalina M. Tejada. 2011. Sovereign Credit Ratings and Spreads in Emerging Markets: Does Investment Grade Matter? IMF Working Paper WP/11/44. Washington, D. C.: IWF. Open Google Scholar
  50. Kaminsky, Graciela, und Sergio L. Schmukler. 2002. Emerging Market Instability: Do Sovereign Ratings Affect Country Risk and Stock Returns? World Bank Economic Review 16. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Open Google Scholar
  51. Kapstein, Ethan B. 1994. Governing the Global Economy: International Finance and the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  52. Kerwer, Dieter. 2002. Standardizing as governance: the case of credit rating agencies. In Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, Hrsg. Open Google Scholar
  53. Adrienne Héritier, 293-315. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  54. King, Michael R., und Timothy J. Sinclair. 2003. Private Actors and Public Policy: A ­Requiem for the New Basel Capital Accord. International Political Science Review 24: 345-362. DOI: 10.1177/0192512103024003004. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0192512103024003004
  55. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2. Auf­lage. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  56. Kruck, Andreas. 2013. The Regulatory Use of Credit Ratings in Germany and the US: A Resource Dependence View on the Transfer of (Quasi-) Regulatory Authority. German Policy Studies 9: 141-176. Open Google Scholar
  57. Larraín, Guillermo, Helmut Reisen, und Julia von Maltzan. 1997. Emerging Market Risks and Sovereign Credit Ratings. OECD Development Centre Working Papers (124). ­Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Open Google Scholar
  58. Moody’s Investors Service. 2008. Rating Methodology, Moody’s Global Sovereign - ­Sovereign Bond Ratings. http://www.moodys.com. Zugegriffen: 21.08.2010. Open Google Scholar
  59. Moody’s Investors Service. 2013a. About Us, Moody’s Corporation. http://www.moodys.com/Pages/atc.aspx. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  60. Moody’s Investors Service. 2013b. Special Comment: Sovereign Default and Recovery Rates, 1983-2012. https://www.moodys.com/Pages/Sovereign-Default-Research.aspx. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  61. Moody’s Investors Service. 2014. Sovereign & Supranational. https://www.moodys.com/researchandratings/market-segment/sovereign-supranational/-/005005/4294966293/ Open Google Scholar
  62. 4294966623/0/0/-/0/rr. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014 Open Google Scholar
  63. Mosley, Layna. 2003. Attempting Global Standards: National Governments, International Finance, and the IMF’s Data Regime. Review of International Political Economy 10: 331-362. Open Google Scholar
  64. Nelson, Stephen C. 2010. Does compliance matter? Assessing the relationship between sovereign risk and compliance with international monetary law. The Review of International Organizations 5: 107-139. DOI: 10.1007/s11558-010-9080-7. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9080-7
  65. Nölke, Andreas, und James Perry. 2007. Coordination Service Firms and the Erosion of Rhenish Capitalism. In The Transnational Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation, Hrsg. Henk Overbeek, Bastiaan van Apeldoorn und Andreas Nölke, 121-136. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1185
  66. Panizza, Ugo, Federico Sturzenegger, und Jeromin Zettelmeyer. 2009. The Economics and Law of Sovereign Debt and Default. Journal of Economic Literature 47: 651-698. DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.3.651. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.3.651
  67. Partnoy, Frank. 1999. The Siskel and Ebert of Financial Markets?: Two Thumbs Down for the Credit Rating Agencies. Washington University Law Quarterly 77: 619-715. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.167412. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.167412
  68. Petrie, Murray. 2003. Promoting Fiscal Transparency - The Complementary Roles of the IMF, Financial Markets and Civil Society. IMF Working Paper, WP/03/199. Washington, D. C.: IWF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5089/9781451860139.001
  69. Political Risk Services Group. 2014. About Us. https://www.prsgroup.com/about-us/about-prs. Zugegriffen: 05.09.2014. Open Google Scholar
  70. Redak, Vanessa. 2006. Risks, Ratings, and Regulation: Toward a Reorganization of Credit via Basel II? In The Political Economy of Financial Market Regulation, Hrsg. Peter Mooslechner, Helene Schuberth und Beat Weber, 191-213. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4337/9781781007549.00016
  71. Reinhart, Carmen. M., und Kenneth S. Rogoff. 2009. This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  72. Reisen, Helmut, und Julia von Maltzan. 1999. Boom and Bust and Sovereign Ratings. OECD Development Centre Working Papers (148). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-2362.00028
  73. Reserve Bank of Australia. 2013. Eligible Securities. http://www.rba.gov.au/mkt-operations/resources/tech-notes/eligible-securities.html#a$sec-fsgg. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  74. Sassen, Saskia. 1996. Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  75. Schultz, Kenneth A., und Barry R. Weingast. 2003. The Democratic Advantage: Institutional Foundations of Financial Power in International Competition. International Organization 57: 3-42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303571065
  76. Schumacher, Julian, Christoph Trebesch, und Henrik Enderlein. 2013. Sovereign Defaults in Court: The Rise of Creditor Litigation 1976-2010. http://ssrn.com/abstract= Open Google Scholar
  77. 2189997. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  78. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2012. Summary Report of Commission Staff’s Examinations of Each Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization, ­November 2012. http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2012/2012-228.htm. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  79. Sinclair, Timothy J. 2005. The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. Standard & Poor’s (S&P). 2010. The Future of Sovereign Credit Ratings. http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245226449301. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  81. Standard & Poor’s (S&P). 2011. Sovereign Government Rating Methodology And ­Assumptions, 30 June 2011. www.standardandpoors.com/spf/upload/Ratings_EMEA/ Open Google Scholar
  82. 2011-06-30_CBEvent_CriteriaGovSovRatingMethodologyAndAssumptions.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22.10.2014. Open Google Scholar
  83. Standard & Poor’s (S&P). 2013a. About Us: A History of Standard & Poor’s. http://www.standardandpoors.com/about-sp/timeline/en/us/. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2013. Open Google Scholar
  84. Standard & Poor’s (S&P). 2013b. Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions, 24 June 2013. http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/sovresearch/en/us. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  85. Standard & Poor’s (S&P). 2013c. Default Study: Sovereign Defaults And Rating Transition Data, 2012 Update, 29 March 2013. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  86. Standard & Poor’s (S&P). 2013d. Sovereigns Rating List. http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/sovereigns/ratings-list/en/us/?subSectorCode=39&sectorId=1221186707758&subSectorId=1221187348494. Zugegriffen: 15.07.2013. Open Google Scholar
  87. Stone, Randall W. 2008. The Scope of IMF Conditionality. International Organization 62: 589-620. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818308080211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080211
  88. Sturzenegger, Frederico, und Jeromin Zettelmeyer. 2006. Debt Defaults and Lessons from a Decade of Crises. Cambridge, M. A.: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  89. Swiss National Bank. 2009. Instruction sheet on collateral eligible for SNB repos. Instruction sheet 5, Appendix to the Guidelines of the Swiss National Bank (SNB) on Monetary Policy Instruments, Zurich, 5 October 2009. http://www.snb.ch/en/mmr/reference/repo_mb22/source. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  90. Sy, Amadou N. R. 2001. Emerging Market Bond Spreads and Sovereign Credit Ratings: Reconciling Market Views with Economic Fundamentals. IMF Working Paper WP/01/165. Washington, D. C.: IWF. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5089/9781451858051.001
  91. The Joint Forum. 2009. Stocktaking on the use of credit ratings, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International Organisation Of Securities Commissions & International Association of Insurance Supervisors. http://www.bis.org/publ/joint22.pdf?noframes=1. Zugegriffen: 21.08.2010. Open Google Scholar
  92. Tomz, Michael, und Mark L. J. Wright. 2007. Do Countries Default in “Bad Times”? Journal of the European Economic Association 5: 350-360. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2007.5.2-3.352
  93. US Department of State. 2013. Sovereign Credit Rating for sub-Saharan Africa. http://www.state.gov/p/af/rt/scr/. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  94. Wall Street Journal. 2011. White House Challenges S&P Decision. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424053111903454504576492724028210348. Zugegriffen: 04.01.2014. Open Google Scholar
  95. White, Lawrence J. 2010. The Credit Rating Agencies. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24: 211-226. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.211

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Share via email

Media