The quandaries of transformation. On the socio-ecological dilemma of simultaneity

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Issue 2
Open Access Full access

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Volume 10 (2025), Issue 2


Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2026
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Chapter information


Open Access Full access

Volume 10 (2025), Issue 2

The quandaries of transformation. On the socio-ecological dilemma of simultaneity


Authors:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742


Preview:

This paper provides a specific sociological explanation of the failing in effective climate protection, analysing the unique societal constellations in which a socio-ecological transformation is embedded. Starting with the urgent calls by the IPCC for rapid and far-reaching transitions across all sectors and systems of society in the current decade, the paper explains why such disruptive change is rather unlikely. Since a fundamental ecological turnaround has to change economics, politics, cultural lifestyles and technical infrastructure at the very same time, socio-ecological transformation is confronted with the dilemma of simultaneity. This precarious figuration of an ecological change gives rise to certain quandaries of transformation as capitalism, climate protection, sustainable life conducts and democracy cannot be smoothly reconciled and coordinated. Therefore, realistic transformation strategies should tackle this dilemma from the outset and strive to avoid getting completely entangled in its quandaries. As outlined in the final section of the paper, sustainable infrastructure and strengthening the common good could be viable ways to navigate the dilemmas of socio-ecological change more effectively.

Bibliography


  1. Battistoni, A. & Britton-Purdy, J. (2020). After Carbon Democracy. Dissent, 67(1), 51–60. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  2. Beckert, J. (2025). How We Sold Our Future: The Failure to Fight Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  3. Blühdorn, I. (2022). Post-Democracy and Post-Sustainability. In B. Bornemann et al. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Democracy and Sustainability. London: Routledge, 476–494. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  4. Brownhill, L. et al. (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge Handbook on Ecosocialism. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  5. BVerfG (2021). Order of the First Senate of 24 March 2021. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2021/03/rs20210324_1bvr265618en.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  6. Christophers, B. (2022). Fossilised Capital: Price and Profit in the Energy Transition. New Political Economy, 27(1), 146–159. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  7. Climate, Climatic Change, and Society (CLICCS) (2023). Fossile CO2-Emissionen erreichen neues Rekordhoch. December 5. https://www.cliccs.uni-hamburg.de/de/about-cliccs/news/2023-news/2023-12-05-global-carbon-ilyina.html. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  8. Der Standard (2021, March 2). Heute vor 20 Jahren: Zukunftsforscher prophezeien Ende des Internetbooms. https://www.derstandard.de/story/2000124571379/heute-vor-20-jahren-zukunftsforscherprophezeien-ende-des-internet-booms. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  9. Elias, N. (1977). Zur Grundlegung einer Theorie sozialer Prozesse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 6(2), 127–149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  10. Elias, N. (2006a). Figuration. In B. Schäfers & J. Knopp (Eds.), Grundbegriffe der Soziologie. 9th Revised and Updated Edition. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 73–76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  11. Elias, N. (2006b). Figuration, sozialer Prozeß und Zivilisation: Grundbegriffe der Soziologie. In N. Elias, Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 16: Aufsätze und andere Schriften III. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  12. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2023). Treibhausgasemissionen in der EU. https://www.eea.europa.eu/de/highlights/die-treibhausgasemissionen-in-der-eu Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  13. Forman, E. et al. (2020). The Municipalist Moment. Dissent, 67(1). https://dissentmagazine.org/article/the-municipalist-moment/. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  14. Friedlingstein, P. et al. (2022). Global Carbon Budget 2022. Earth System Science Data, 14(11), 4811–4900. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  15. Hirschman, A. O. (1973). The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023). Climate Change 2023. Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Summary for Policymakers). Geneva. Doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6–9789291691647.001. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  17. Kemp, L. et al. (2022). Climate Endgame: Exploring Catastrophic Climate Change Scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 119(34). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  18. Kemp, L. (2025). Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse. London: Penguin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  19. Kraushaar, W. (2008). Achtundsechzig. Eine Bilanz. Berlin: Propyläen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  20. Merkel, W. (2010). Systemtransformation. Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  21. Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life. Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  22. Offe, C. (1991). Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central. Social Research, 58(4), 865–892. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  23. Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  24. Republik (2025): Erfolgreich gescheitert. Kopenhagen und sein Klimaziel. https://www.republik.ch/2025/05/21/erfolgreich-gescheitert. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  25. Ripple, W. J. et al. (2024). The 2024 State of the Climate Report: Perilous Times on Planet Earth. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae087. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  26. Saito, K. (2024). Slow Down: The Degrowth Manifesto. London: Penguin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  27. Schmelzer, M. et al. (2022). The Future is Degrowth. A Guide to a World beyond Capitalism. London: Verso. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  28. Statista (2025a). USA: Entwicklung der CO2-Emissionen von 1960 bis 2023. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1382237/umfrage/entwicklung-der-co2-emissionen-in-den-usa/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  29. Statista (2025b). Treibhausgasemissionen in Deutschland nach Sektoren. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1241046/umfrage/treibhausgasemissionen-in-deutschland-nach-sektor. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  30. Weber, M. (1988 [1920]). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex