Gestaltungsbereiche der Digitalen Transformation von Unternehmen: Entwicklung eines Reifegradmodells

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 70 (2016), Issue 2
Full access

Die Unternehmung

Volume 70 (2016), Issue 2

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2016
ISSN-Online
0042-059X
ISSN-Print
0042-059X

Chapter information

Full access

Volume 70 (2016), Issue 2

Gestaltungsbereiche der Digitalen Transformation von Unternehmen: Entwicklung eines Reifegradmodells

Authors:
ISSN-Print
0042-059X
ISSN-Online
0042-059X
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Adler, H. et al. (Hrsg.) (1995): Rechnungslegung und Prüfung der Unternehmen Kommentar, 6. Aufl., Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  2. Baums, T. (1993): Ergebnisabhängige Preisvereinbarungen in Unternehmenskaufverträgen (earn-outs), in: Der Betrieb, Jg. 46, Nr. 25, S. 1273-1276. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  3. Beisel, M./Klumpp, H. H. (Hrsg.) (2009): Der Unternehmenskauf, 6. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  4. Bloechle, D./Dumser, K. (2012): Earn-Out-Klauseln in Unternehmenskaufverträgen, in: Die Unterneh-mensbesteuerung, Jg. 5, Nr. 2, S.108-114. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  5. Bruner, R. F./Perella J. R. (2004): Applied Mergers & Acquisitons, 1. Aufl., Hoboken. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  6. Cadman, B./Carrizosa, R./Faurel, L. (2014): Economic Determinants and Information Environment Ef-fects of Earn¬outs: New Insights from SFAS 141 (R), in: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 52, No. 1, S. 37-74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  7. Cain, M. D./Denis, D. J./Denis, D. K. (2011): Earn¬outs: A study of financial contracting in ac¬qui¬si¬ti⁠on agreements, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 51, No. 1/2, S. 151-170. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  8. Coff, R.W. (1999): How Buyers Cope with Uncertainty when Acquiring Firms in Knowledge-Intensive Industries: Caveat Emptor, in: Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, S. 144-161. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  9. Datar, S./Frankel, R./Wolfson, M. (2001): Earn¬outs: The Effects of Adverse Selection and Agency on Acquisition Techniques, in: Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 17. No. 1, S. 201-238. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  10. Ewelt-Knauer, C./Knauer, T./Pex, S. (2011): Ausgestaltung und Einsatzbereiche von Earn-Outs in Un-ternehmenskaufverträgen, in: Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Jg. 63, Nr. 6, S. 371-400. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  11. Ewelt-Knauer, C./Knauer, T. (2011): Variable Kaufpreisklauseln bei (Teil-)Unternehmenserwerben – Status quo zum Einsatz in der Praxis sowie bilanzielle Abbildung nach HGB und IFRS, in: Deutsches Steuerrecht, Jg. 49, Nr. 40, S. 1918-1922. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  12. Feil, M. S./Weiser, M. F. (2004): Die Earn¬out-Methode zur Überwindung divergierender Werteinschät-zungen im Rahmen von M&A-Transaktionen, in: M&A Review, Jg. 15, Nr. 12, S. 512-518. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  13. Fey, G./Deubert, M. (2012): Bedingte Anschaffungskosten für Beteiligungen im handelsrechtlichen Jahresabschluss des Erwerbers, in: Betriebs-Berater, Jg. 67, Nr. 23, S. 1461-1466. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  14. Foerschle, G./Deubert, M. (2014): § 301, in: Foerschle, G. et al. (Hrsg.): Beck’scher Bilanz-Kommentar, 9. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  15. Gelhausen, F. (2012): Erläuterungen zu den für alle Kaufleute geltenden Vorschriften zum Jahresab-schluss, in: IDW (Hrsg.): WP-Handbuch 2012, Band I, 14. Aufl., Düsseldorf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  16. Heimann, C./Timmreck, C./Lukas, E. (2012): Ist der Einsatz von Earn-outs durch deutsche Käuferun-ternehmen erfolgreich?, in: Corporate Finance biz, Jg. 3, Nr. 1, S. 17-23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  17. Knauer, T./Pex, S. (2011): Earn-Outs, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 71, Nr. 4, S. 401-405. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  18. Koss, C./Wohlgemuth, M. (Hrsg.) (2010): Jahres- und Konzernabschluss nach Handels- und Steuer-recht, Band A, 13. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  19. Kulosa, E. (2015): § 6, in: Schmidt, L. (Hrsg.): EStG Einkommensteuergesetz Kommentar, 34. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  20. Labbè, M. (2004): Earn-out Ansatz als Option zur preislichen Gestaltung von Unternehmenstransaktio-nen, in: Finanz-Betrieb, Jg. 6, Nr. 2, S. 117-121. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  21. Link, M. (2014): Bilanzielle und steuerliche Fragestellungen bei Earn-out-Gestaltungen, in: Betriebs-Berater, Jg. 69, Nr. 10, S. 554-558. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  22. Lukas, E./Heimann, C. (2014): Technological-induced information asymmetry, M&A and Earn¬outs: stock market evidence from Germany, in: Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 24, No. 7, S. 481-493. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  23. Mantecon, T. (2009): Mitigating risks in cross-border acquisitions, in: Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 33, No. 4, S. 640-651. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  24. Meier-Mazzucato, G. (2009): Entgeltliche Unternehmensnachfolge von KMU mit Schwerpunkt steuerliche Aspekte, 1. Aufl., Bern. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  25. Meier-Mazzucato, G./Ricklin, D. (2014): Earn-Out mit Bewertungs- und Finanzierungsfunktion als pro-bate Methode bei der Unternehmensnachfolge, in: Der Treuhandexperte, Jg. 21, Nr. 5, S. 284-294. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  26. Moser, M. (2011): Kaufpreisklauseln in Unternehmenskaufverträgen, in: Berens, W./Brauner, H. U./ Strauch, J. (Hrsg.): Due Diligence bei Unternehmensakquisitionen, 6. Aufl., Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  27. Quinn, B. J. M. (2012): Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: The Performance of Earn¬outs in Corporate Acquisitions, in: University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 81, S. 127-172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  28. Ragozzino, R./Reuer, J. J. (2009): Contingent Earn¬outs in Acquisition of Privately Held Targets, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, S. 857-879. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  29. Reuer, J. J./Shenkar, O./Ragozzino, R. (2004): Mitigating Risk in International Mergers and Acquisi-tions: The Role of Contingent Payouts, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, S. 19-32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  30. Reum, W. R./Steele, T. A. (1970): Contingent payouts cut acquisitions risks, in: Harvard Business Re-view, Vol. 48, No. 2, S. 83-91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  31. Schreiber, U. (2012): Besteuerung der Unternehmen – Eine Einführung in Steuerrecht und Steuerwir-kung, 3. Aufl., Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  32. Schubert, W. J./Gadek, S. (2014): § 255, in: Foerschle, G. et al. (Hrsg.): Beck’scher Bilanz-Kommentar, 9. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  33. Tallau, C. (2009): Bewertung von Earn-Out-Klauseln im Rahmen von Unternehmenstransaktionen, in: Finanz-Betrieb, Jg. 11, Nr. 1, S. 8-14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  34. Weston, J. F./Mitchell, M. L./Mulherin, J. H. (2004): Takovers, restructuring and corporate governance, 4. Aufl., New Jersey. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  35. Vischer, M. (2002): Earn out-Klauseln in Unternehmenskaufverträgen, in: Schweizerische Juristen-Zeitung, Jg. 98, Nr. 21, S. 509-517. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  36. Rechtsprechungs-/Quellenverzeichnis Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  37. BFH-Urteil vom 23.2.1984 – IV R 128/81 BStBI. 1984 II S. 516. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  38. BFH-Urteil vom 22.8.2007 – X R 2/04 BStBl. 2008 II S. 109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  39. BFH-Beschluss vom 1.9.2010 – IV B 132/09, BFH/NV 2011. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  40. BFH-Urteil vom 25.11.1970 – I R 165/67 BStBl. 1971 II S. 142. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  41. DBG (1990): Bundesgesetz über die direkte Bundessteuer vom 14.12.1990 (Stand am 1.1.2016). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  42. EStG (2002): Einkommensteuergesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 8. Oktober 2009, in: BGBl. I S. 3366, 3862, das zuletzt durch Artikel 2 des Gesetzes vom 21. Dezember 2015, in: BGBl. I S. 2553 geändert worden ist. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  43. Einkommensteuer-Richtlinien 2012 (EStR) vom 16.12.2005 BStBl. 2005 I Sondernummer 1 geändert durch Einkommensteuer-Änderungsrichtlinien 2008 (EStÄR 2008) vom 18.12.2008 BStBl. 2008 I S. 1017 und Einkommensteuer-Änderungsrichtlinien 2012 (EStÄR 2012) vom 25.3.2013 BStBl. 2013 I S. 276. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-77
  44. Aaen, I. et al. (2007). SPI Agility: How to Navigate Improvement Projects. Software Process Improvement and Practice, (12), 267–281. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  45. Albu, E./Panzar, C. (2010). A new tool for assessing maturity alignment: The enterprise maturity matrix. Performance Improvement, 49(9), 35–47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  46. Argyris, C./Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Reading Mass <etc.>: Addison-Wesley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  47. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(99), 120. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  48. Bartel, A. P. et al. (2005). How Does Information Technology Really Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement and Worker Skills. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1721–1758. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  49. Baumöl, U. (2008). Change Management in Organisationen. Situative Methodenkonstruktion für flexible Veränderungsprozesse. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  50. BearingPoint Ltd. (2014). Becoming a World Class Digital Organisation: Six best practices for digital transformation. Retrieved from http://www.bearingpoint.com/en-gb/adaptive-thinking/insights/becoming-a-world-class-digital-organisation/. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  51. Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  52. Becker, J. et al. (2009). Developing Maturity Models for IT Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213–222. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  53. Becker, J. et al. (2010). Maturity Models in IS Research. In ECIS 2010 Proceedings (Paper 42). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  54. Beese, J. et al. (2015). On the Role of Complexity for Guiding Enterprise Transformations. In Aveiro, D. et al. (Eds.), Advances in Enterprise Engineering IX SE – 8 (Vol. 211, pp. 113–127). Springer International Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  55. Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models. Strategy & Leadership, 40(2), 16–24. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  56. Besson, P./Rowe, F. (2012). Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 103–124. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  57. Bharadwaj, A. (2000). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  58. Bharadwaj, A. et al. (2013). Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  59. Bi, R. et al. (2011). Building IT Capability to Increase Organizational Performance: A Path-Oriented Process. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3(3). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  60. Blondiau, A. et al. (2013). Design and Implementation Challenges of Maturity Models for Healthcare Organizations : An Experience Report. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Health Information Management Research, 1–9. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  61. Bourreau, M. et al. (2012). The Impact of a Radical Innovation on Business Models: Incremental Adjustments or Big Bang? Industry and Innovation, 19(5), 415–435. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  62. Brenner, W. et al. (2014). User, Use & Utility Research. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 56(1), 65–72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  63. Brynjolfsson, E./Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  64. Buchwald, A. et al. (2014). Business value through controlled IT: toward an integrated model of IT governance success and its impact. Journal of Information Technology, 29(2), 128–147. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  65. Chae, H.-C., et al. (2014). Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 305–326. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  66. Chaffey, D. (2010). Applying organisational capability models to assess the maturity of digital-marketing governance. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(3/4), 187–196. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  67. Chakravarty, A. et al. (2013). Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976–997. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  68. Chatterjee, D./Ravichandran, T. (2013). Governance of Interorganizational Information Systems: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Information Systems Research, 24(2), 261–278. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  69. Chen, D. Q. et al. (2010). Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 233–259. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  70. Cleven, A. et al. (2014). Process management in hospitals: an empirically grounded maturity model. Business Research, 1–26. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  71. Cravens, D. W. et al. (2009). Management framework guiding strategic thinking in rapidly changing markets. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(1/2), 31–49. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  72. De Bruin, T. et al. (2005). Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model. In Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS),. Australasian Chapter of the Association for Information Systems. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  73. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale Development: theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage 2003. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  74. Drnevich, P. L./Croson, D. C. (2013). Information Technology and Business-Level Strategy: Toward an Integrated Theoretical Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 483–509. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  75. Eisenhardt, K. M./Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilites: What are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10), 1105–1121. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  76. Enkel, E. et al. (2011). Open Innovation Maturity Framework. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(06), 1161–1189. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  77. Frankenberger, K. et al. (2013). Network configuration, customer centricity, and performance of open business models: A solution provider perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 671–682. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  78. Friedel, D./Back, A. (2012). Bestimmung des Enterprise-2.0-Entwicklungsstands mit einem Reifegradmodell. In Back, A. et al. (Eds.), Web 2.0 und Social Media in der Unternehmenspraxis – Grundlagen, Anwendungen und Methoden mit zahlreichen Fallstudien (pp. 102–108). München: Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  79. Gal, U. et al. (2007). Explaining Radical Technology-Based Innovations in Organizations. In AMCIS 2007 Proceedings (Paper 113). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  80. Ganguly, A. et al. (2009). Evaluating agility in corporate enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(2), 410–423. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  81. Govindarajan, V./Kopalle, P. K. (2006). Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 189–199. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  82. Gray, P. et al. (2013). Realizing Strategic Value Through Center-Edge Digital Transformation in Consumer-Centric Industries. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(1), 1–17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  83. Green, W./Cluley, R. (2014). The field of radical innovation: Making sense of organizational cultures and radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1343–1350. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  84. Grover, V./Kohli, R. (2012). Cocreating IT Value: New Capabilities and Metrics for Multifirm Environments. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 225–232. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  85. Hansen, A. M. et al. (2011). Rapid Adaptation in Digital Transformation: A Participatory Process for Engaging IS and Business Leaders. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(4), 175–185. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  86. Harris, J. et al. (2012). IT consumerization: when gadgets turn into enterprise IT tools. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2012(3), 99–112. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  87. Henderson, J. C./Venkatraman, H. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 472–484. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  88. Henfridsson, O./Yoo, Y. (2014). The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 25(3), 932–950. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  89. Iivari, J./Iivari, N. (2011). Varieties of user-centredness: an analysis of four systems development methods. Information Systems Journal, 21(2), 125–153. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  90. Jahani, B. et al. (2010). Measurement of enterprise architecture readiness within organizations. Business Strategy Series, 11(3), 177–191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  91. Janssen, S. et al. (2011). Using performance measures conceptually in innovation control. Journal of Management Control, 22(1), 107–128. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  92. Labusch, N. et al. (2014). A Reference Model for the Information-Based Support of Enterprise Transformations. In Tremblay, M. C. et al. (Eds.), Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice – 9th International Conference, DESRIST 2014, Miami, FL, USA, May 22-24, 2014. Proceedings (Vol. 8463, pp. 194–208). Springer International Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  93. Lahrmann, G. et al. (2011). Inductive Design of Maturity Models: Applying the Rasch Algorithm for Design Science Research. In DESRIST 2011 (pp. 176–191). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  94. Land, K.-H. (2014). Digital Readiness Index 2014: Executive Summary. Köln. Retrieved from http://www.neuland.me/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/nl_Summary_v5.pdf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  95. Leidner, D. E. et al. (2011). An empirical investigation of the relationship of IS strategy with firm performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(4), 419–437. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  96. Leimeister, J. M. et al. (2009). Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 197–224. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  97. Leimeister, J. M. et al. (2014). Digital services for consumers. Electronic Markets, 24(4), 255–258. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  98. Liang, T./Tanniru, M. (2006). Customer-Centric Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 9–15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  99. Liu, D.-Y. et al. (2011). Resource fit in digital transformationLessons learned from the CBC Bank global e-banking project. Management Decision, 49(10), 1728–1742. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  100. Lloyds Bank (2014). UK Business Digital Index 2014. Retrieved from: https://resources.lloydsbank.com/news/launch-of-uk-business-digital-index-2014/. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  101. Lyytinen, K./Rose, G. M. (2003). The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 557–595. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  102. Lyytinen, K. et al. (2010). Learning routines and disruptive technological change: Hyper-learning in seven software development organizations during internet adoption. Information Technology & People, 23(2), 165–192. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  103. Margherita, A./Petti, C. (2010). ICT-enabled and process-based change: an integrative roadmap. Business Process Management Journal, 16(3), 473–491. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  104. Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  105. Matt, C. et al. (2015). Digital Transformation Strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339–343. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  106. Mettler, T. (2010). Supply Management im Krankenhaus: Konstruktion und Evaluation eines konfigurierbaren Reifegradmodells zur zielgerichteten Gestaltung. University of St.Gallen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  107. Mithas, S. et al. (2013). Leveraging Big Data and Business Analytics. IEEE IT Professional, 15(6), 18–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  108. Mithas, S. et al. (2013). How a Firm’s Competitive Environment and Digital Strategic Posture Influence Digital Business Strategy. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 511–536. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  109. Moreau, F. (2013). The Disruptive Nature of Digitization: The Case of the Recorded Music Industry. International Journal of Arts Management, 15(2), 18–31. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  110. Mullaly, M. (2014). If maturity is the answer, then exactly what was the question? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(2), 169–185. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  111. Neff, A. A. et al. (2014). Developing a maturity model for service systems in heavy equipment manufacturing enterprises. Information & Management, 51(7), 895-911. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  112. Österle, H. (1995). Business Engineering: Prozess- und Systementwicklung. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  113. Österle, H. (2007). Business Engineering – Geschäftsmodelle transformieren. In Loos, P./ Krcmar, H. (Eds.), Architekturen und Prozesse: Strukturen und Dynamik in Forschung und Unternehmen (pp. 71–84). Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  114. Österle, H./Winter, R. (2003). Business Engineering. In Österle, H./ Winter, R. (Eds.), Business Engineering. Auf dem Weg zum Unternehmen des Informationszeitalters (pp. 3–19). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  115. Otto, B. (2010). IT Governance and Organizational Transformation: Findings From an Action Research Study. In AMCIS 2010 Proceedings. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  116. Paulk, M. C. et al. (1993). Capability maturity model for software, Version 1.1. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471028959.sof589/full. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  117. Philip, G./McKeown, I. (2004). Business Transformation and Organizational Culture: The Role of Competency, IS and TQM. European Management Journal, 22(6), 624–636. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  118. Pöppelbuß, J./Röglinger, M. (2011). What Makes a Useful Maturity Model? A Framework of General Design Principles for Maturity Models and Its Demonstration in Business Process Management. In ECIS 2011 Proceedings. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  119. Pries-Heje, J./Baskerville, R. (2010). Management Design Theories. In Pries-Heje, J. et al. (Eds.), Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research SE – 16 (Vol. 318, pp. 263–281). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  120. PwC. (2013). Profitable growth in the digital age: Unleash your potential. London. Retrieved from http://www.pwc.ch/user_content/editor/files/publ_adv/pwc_profitable_growth_e.pdf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  121. Qu, W. G. et al. (2010). The strategic value of IT insourcing: An IT-enabled business process perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(2), 96–108. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  122. Quaadgras, A. et al. (2014). Management commitments that maximize business impact from IT. Journal of Information Technology, 29(2), 114–127. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  123. Raber, D. (2013). Reifegradmodellbasierte Weiterentwicklung von Business Intelligence im Unternehmen. University of St.Gallen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  124. Röglinger, M. et al. (2012). Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 328–346. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  125. Sambamurthy, V. et al. (2003). Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  126. Sammer, T. et al. (2013). The New Enterprise Mobility: Seizing the Opportunities and Challenges in Corporate Mobile IT. In Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (pp. 1–8). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  127. Sharma, R. et al. (2014). Transforming decision-making processes: a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(4), 433–441. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  128. Smith, H. A./McKeen, J. (2011). Enabling Collaboration with IT. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  129. Sonntag, R./Müller, M. (2013). E-Business Reifegradmodell. Der Wert von E-Business in Ihrem Unternehmen. Retrieved from: http://www.t-systems-mms.com/unternehmen/downloads/e-business-beratung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  130. Spee, A. P./Jarzabkowski, P. (2009). Strategy tools as boundary objects. Strategic Organization, London, UK, 7(2), 223–232. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  131. Steimel, B. et al. (2014). Digital Transformation Report 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dt-award.de/. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  132. Swanson, E. B. (1994). Information Systems Among Innovation Organizations. Management Science, 40(9), 1069–1092. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  133. Teece, D. J. et al. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  134. Tiwana, A. et al. (2013). Special Issue: Information Technology and Organizational Governance: The IT Governance Cube. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 7–12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  135. Tornatzky, L. G. et al. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington (Mass.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  136. van Dyck, C. et al. (2005). Organizational Error Management Culture and Its Impact on Performance: A Two-Study Replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228–1240. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  137. Walton, D. (2014). Social Systems Design in Organizational Change. In G. S. Metcalf (Ed.), Social Systems and Design SE – 9 (Vol. 1, pp. 213–232). Springer Japan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  138. Weichbrodt, J. et al. (2014). FlexWork-Phasenmodell: Ein Instrument zur Bestimmung der örtlichen und zeitlichen Arbeitsflexibilität in Organisationen. Retrieved from http://www.fhnw.ch/aps/ifk/projekte/aktuelle-projekte/flex_work_phasenmodell/. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  139. Weill, P./Woerner, S. L. (2013). The Future of the CIO in a Digital Economy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(2), 65–75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  140. Westerman, G. et al. (2011). Digital Transformation: A Road-Map for Billion-Dollar Organizations. Cambridge MA & Paris: MIT Center for Digital Business & Capgemini Consulting. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  141. Westerman, G. et al. (2012). The Digital Advantage: How digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry. Cambridge MA & Paris: MIT Center for Digital Business & Capgemini Consulting. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  142. Wiklund, K. et al. (2013). Impediments in Agile Software Development: An Empirical Investigation. In Heidrich, J. et al. (Eds.), Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (pp. 35–49). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  143. Winter, R. (2011). Business Engineering Navigator. Gestaltung und Analyse von Geschäftslösungen "Business-to-IT". Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  144. Yoo, Y. et al. (2010). The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  145. Zephir, O. et al. (2011). A maturity model to assess organisational readiness for change. International Journal of Technology Management, 55(3), 286–296. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-98
  146. Ansoff, H. I. (1975): Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals, in: California Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, p. 21-33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  147. Aziz, S. A./Fitzsimmons, J./Douglas, E. (2008): Clarifying the Business Model Construct, Paper presented at the AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  148. Baden-Fuller, C./Haefliger, S. (2013): Business Models and Technological Innovation, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 46, No. 6, p. 419-426. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  149. BITKOM/Fraunhofer IAO (Ed.). (2014): Industrie 4.0 – Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland, Berlin: BITKOM. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  150. BMBF. (2013): Hightech-Strategie: Zukunftsbild Industrie 4.0, Bonn. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  151. Bock, A. J./Opsahl, T./George, G., et al. (2012): The Effects of Culture and Structure on Strategic Flexibility during Business Model Innovation, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 49, No. 2, p. 279-305. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  152. Bucherer, E./Eisert, U./Gassmann, O. (2012): Towards Systematic Business Model Innovation: Lessons from Product Innovation Management, in: Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 183-198. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  153. Casadesus-Masanell, R./Ricart, J. E. (2010): From Strategy to Business Models and onto Tactics, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, p. 195-215. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  154. Casadesus-Masanell, R./Zhu, F. (2013): Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 4, p. 464-482. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  155. Cavalcante, S./Kesting, P./Ulhøi, J. (2011): Business model dynamics and innovation: (re)establishing missing linkages, in: Management Decision, Vol. 49, No. 8, p. 1327-1342. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  156. Chesbrough, H. (2006): Open business models how to thrive in the new innovation landscape, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  157. Chesbrough, H. (2010): Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, p. 354-363. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  158. Chesbrough, H./Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002): The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin‐off companies, in: Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 529-555. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  159. Christensen, C. M. (1997): The Innovator’s Dilemma, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  160. Christensen, C. M./Bower, J. L. (1996): Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, p. 197-218. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  161. Clough, R. (2014): General Electric Wants to Act Like a Startup, Bloomberg Businessweek, Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-08-07/ge-taps-lean-startup-ideas-for-faster-cheaper-product-rollout on 10.1.2015. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  162. Cooper, R. G./Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1990): The Key Factors in Success, Chicago: American Marketing Association. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  163. Demil, B./Lecocq, X. (2010): Business Model Evolution: In Search of Dynamic Consistency, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2–3, p. 227-246. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  164. Doz, Y. L./Kosonen, M. (2010): Embedding Strategic Agility, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, p. 370-382. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  165. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research, in: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, p. 532-550. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  166. Evans, P./Annuziata, M. (2012): Industrial Internet – Pushing the Boundaries of Minds and Machines: GE. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  167. Fleisch, E./Weinberger, M./Wortmann, F. (2014): Business Models and the Internet of Things, St. Gallen: Bosch Internet of Things & Services Lab Universität St. Gallen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  168. Foss, N. J./Saebi, T. (2015): Business Model Innovation – The Organizational Dimension, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  169. Frankenberger, K./Weiblen, T./Gassmann, O. (2014): The antecedents of open business models: an exploratory study of incumbent firms, in: R&D Management, Vol. 44, No. 2, p. 173-188. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  170. Gassmann, O./Frankenberger, K./Csik, M. (2013): Geschätsmodelle entwickeln – 55 innovative Konzepte mit dem St. Galler Business Model Navigator, München: Hanser. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  171. Geisberger, E./Broy, M. (2012): agendaCPS – Integrierte Forschungsagenda Cyber-Physical Systems, München: acatech. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  172. George, G./Bock, A. J. (2011): The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research, in: Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 35, No. 1, p. 83-111. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  173. Gibson, E./Jetter, A. (2014). Towards a Dynamic Process for Business Model Innovation: A Review of the State-of-the-Art. Paper presented at the PICMET, Kanazawa. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  174. Glaser, B. G./Strauss, A. L. (1967): The discovery of grounded theory strategies for qualitative research, Chicago: Aldine. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  175. Hao-Chen, H./Mei-Chi, L./Lee-Hsuan, L., et al. (2013): Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation, in: Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 26, No. 6, p. 977-1002. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  176. Höflinger, N. (2014): The business model concept and its antecedents and consequences – towards a common understanding, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  177. Iansiti, M./Lakhani, K. (2014): Digital Ubiquity: How Connections, Sensors, and Data Are Revolutionizing Business, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 11/2014. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  178. Johnson, M. W./Christensen, C. M./Kagermann, H. (2008): Reinventing your business model, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 12/2008, p. 50-59. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  179. Kagermann, H./Wahlster, W./Helbig, J. (2013): Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0. Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4.0., Frankfurt/Main: Forschungsunion Wirtschaft-Wissenschaft/acatech. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  180. Leih, S./Linden, G./Teece, D. J. (2015). Business Model Innovation and Organizational Design: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. In N. J. Foss & T. Saebi (Eds.), Business Model Innovation: The Organizational Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  181. Markides, C. (1997): Strategic Innovation, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, p. 9-23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  182. Markides, C. (2006): Disruptive Innovation, In Need of Better Theory, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23, p. 19-25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  183. Markides, C./Geroski, P. (2005): Fast second: How smart companies bypass radical innovation to enter and dominate new market, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  184. Massa, L./Tucci, C. (2013). Business Model Innovation. In M. Dodgson, D. Gann & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  185. McGrath, R. G. (2010): Business Models: A Discovery Driven Approach, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, p. 247-261. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  186. MFW BW/Fraunhofer IPA (Ed.). (2014): Strukturstudie "Industrie 4.0 für Baden-Württemberg", Stuttgart: MFW BW/Fraunhofer IPA. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  187. Miles, M. B./Huberman, A. M. (1994): Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  188. Morris, M./Schindehutte, M./Allen, J. (2005): The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 6, p. 726-735. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  189. Olschewski, F./Weber, M. (2014): Geschäftsmodelle der Industrie 4.0, in: inspect, Vol. 05/2014. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  190. Osterwalder, A. (2004): The Business Model Ontology – A Proposition in a design science approach (Dissertation). University of Lausanne, Lausanne. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  191. Osterwalder, A./Pigneur, Y. (2010): Business Model Generation, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  192. Osterwalder, A./Pigneur, Y./Bernarda, G., et al. (2014): Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  193. Osterwalder, A./Pigneur, Y./Tucci, C. (2005): Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept, in: Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 16, p. 1-25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  194. Palo, T./Tähtinen, J. (2013): Networked business model development for emerging technology-based services, in: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 773-782. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  195. Porter, M./Heppelmann, J. E. (2014): How Smart, Connected Products are Transforming Competition, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 11/2014. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  196. Porter, M. E. (1980): Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  197. Ries, E./Euchner, J. (2013): Conversations: What Large Companies Can Learn from Start-ups: An Interview with Eric Ries, in: Research-Technology Management, Vol. 56, No. 4, p. 12-16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  198. Rudtsch, V./Gausemeier, J./Gesing, J., et al. (2014): Pattern-based Business Model Development for Cyber-Physical Production Systems, in: Procedia CIRP, Vol. 25, p. 313-319. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  199. Saebi, T./Foss, N. J. (2014). Business Models for Open Innovation: Matching Heterogenous Open Innovation Strategies with Business Model Dimensions. Norwegian School of Economics (NHH). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  200. Saritas, O./Smith, J. E. (2011): The Big Picture – trends, drivers, wild cards, discontinuities and weak signals, in: Futures, Vol. 43, No. 3, p. 292-312. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  201. Schiele, H./Krummaker, S. (2011): Consortium benchmarking: Collaborative academic–practitioner case study research, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 64, No. 10, p. 1137-1145. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  202. Schneider, S./Spieth, P. (2013): Business Model Innovation: Towards an integrated future Research Agenda, in: International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 1-34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  203. Schröder, H.-H. (2008): Technologie- und Innovationsplanung (4 ed. Vol. 2), München: Schäffer-Poeschel Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  204. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934): The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, London: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  205. Shafer, S. M./Smith, H. J./Linder, J. C. (2005): The power of business models, in: Business Horizons, Vol. 48, No. 3, p. 199-207. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  206. Shields, P. M./Rangarajan, N. (2013): Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management, Stillwater: New Forums Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  207. Simonite, T. (2014): The Internet of Things, in: MIT Technology Review, Vol. 117, No. 4, p. 68-78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  208. Sosna, M./Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N./Velamuri, S. R. (2010): Business Model Innovation through Trial-and-Error Learning, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, p. 383-407. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  209. Spieth, P./Schneckenberg, D./Ricart, J. E. (2014): Business model innovation – state of the art and future challenges for the field, in: R&D Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, p. 237-247. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  210. Spiggle, S. (1994): Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, No. 12, p. 491- 503. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  211. Teece, D. J. (2010): Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, p. 172-194. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  212. Webster, J./Watson, R. T. (2002): Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review, in: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 2, p. xiii-xxiii. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  213. Weiblen, T. (2014): The Open Business Model: Understanding an Emerging Concept, in: Journal of Multi Business Model Innovation and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 35-66. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  214. Westerlund, M./Leminen, S./Rajahonka, M. (2014): Designing Business Models for the Internet of Things, in: Technology and Innovation Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 7, p. 5-14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  215. Zellner, G. (2013): Towards a framework for identifying business process redesign patterns, in: Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 600-623. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  216. Zott, C. (2003): Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, p. 97-125. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  217. Zott, C./Amit, R. (2007): Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms, in: Organization Science, Vol. 18, No. 2, p. 181-199. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  218. Zott, C./Amit, R. (2010): Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, p. 216-226. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  219. Zott, C./Amit, R./Massa, L. (2011): The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 1019-1042. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  220. Zühlke, K. (2015): Plattform Industrie 4.0 steht vor dem Aus – Deutschland hat die erste Halbzeit verloren, Retrieved from http://www.funkschau.de/telekommunikation/artikel/116899/ on 11.2.2015. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-124
  221. Antle, R. (1984): Auditor Independence, in: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 22, S. 1-20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  222. Ashbaugh, H./LaFond, R./Mayhwe, B. W. (2003): Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Inde-pendence? Further Evidence, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 78, No. 3, S. 611-639. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  223. Baldacchino, P. J./Borg, J. (2014): An Analysis of the Development of Audit Fees in Malta, in: The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Process, Vol. 13, No. 2, S. 27-52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  224. Bigus, J./Zimmermann, R.-C. (2008): Non-Audit Fees, Market Leaders and Concentration in the Ger-man Audit Market: A Descriptive Analysis, in: International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 12, No. 3, S. 159-179. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  225. Bischof, S. (2006): Anhangangaben zu den Honoraren für Leistungen des Abschlussprüfers, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 59, Nr. 11, S. 705-713. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  226. BT-Drucksache 16/10067 (2008): Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung – Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Modernisierung des Bilanzrechts (Bilanzrechtsmodernisierungsgesetz – BilMoG), in: BT-Drucksache 16/10067 vom 30. 07. 2008. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  227. Chan, H. L./DeBoskey, D. G./Hee, K. (2012): Audit Fee Patterns of Big Four and Non-Big Four Firms, in: The CPA Journal, Vol. 82, Issue 10, S. 32-36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  228. Ciesielski, J. T./Weirich, T. R. (2006): Ups and Downs of Audit Fees Since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in: The CPA Journal, Vol. 76, No. 10, S. 28-35. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  229. DCGK (2013): Deutscher Corporate Governance Kodex (in der Fassung vom 13. Mai 2013 mit Be-schlüssen aus der Plenarsitzung vom 13. Mai 2013). URL: http://dcgk.de//files/dcgk/usercontent/de/download/kodex/D_CorGov_Endfassung_2013.pdf (Stand: 1.04.2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  230. DeFond, M. L./Raghunandan, K./Subramanyam, K. R. (2002): Do Non-Audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions, in: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 40, Issue 4, S. 1247-1274. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  231. DeFond, M. L./Zhang, J. (2014): A review of archival auditing research, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 58, No. 2-3, S. 275-326. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  232. Deutsche Börse (2014a): Historical Index Compositions of the Equity- and Strategy Indices of Deutsche Börse, Version 3.9, April 2014. URL: http://dax-indices.com /DE/MediaLibrary/Document/Historical_Index_Compositions.pdf (Stand: 1.04.2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  233. Deutsche Börse (2014b): Leitfaden zu den Aktienindizes der Deutschen Börse, Version 6.28, August 2014. URL: http://dax-indices.com/DE/MediaLibrary/Document /Leitfaden_Aktienindizes.pdf (Stand: 1.04.2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  234. Deutsche Börse (2014c): EU-regulierter Markt: Prime Standard – Wesentliche Zulassungsvorausset-zungen und Folgepflichten. URL: http://xetra.com/xetra/dispatch/de/binary/gdb _content_pool/imported_files/public_files/10_downloads/33_going_being_public/10_products/transparency_factsheets/FS_PS_shares.pdf (Stand: 1.04.2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  235. Ebke, W. F. (2013): Kommentierung von § 318 HGB, in: Schmidt, K. (Hrsg.): Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch, 3. Auflage, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  236. Ettredge, M./Fuerherm, E. E./Li, C. (2014): Fee pressure and audit quality, in: Accounting, Organiza-tions and Society, Vol. 39, No. 4, S. 247-263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  237. Eichenseher, J. W./Danos, P. (1981): The Analysis of Industry-Specific Auditor Concentration: Towards an Explanatory Model, in: Accounting Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, S. 479-492. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  238. Ettredge, M./Greenberg, R. (1990): Determinants of Fee Cutting on Initial Audit Engagements, in: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 28, Issue 1, S. 198-210. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  239. EU-Kommission (2002): Empfehlung der Kommission vom 16. Mai 2002: Unabhängigkeit des Ab-schlussprüfers in der EU – Grundprinzipien (2002/590/EG), in: Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemein-schaften vom 19.7.2002, L191, S. 22-57. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/AUTO/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2002.191.01.0022. 01.DEU (Stand: 1.04.2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  240. EU-Kommission (2010): Europäische Kommission, Grünbuch. Weiteres Vorgehen im Bereich der Abschlussprüfung: Lehren aus der Krise. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2010/audit/green_paper_audit_de.pdf (Stand 1.04.2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  241. EU-Parlament & Rat der EU (2004): Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Prüfung des Jahresabschlusses und des konsolidierten Abschlusses und zur Änderung der Richtlinien 78/660/EWG und 83/349/EWG des Rates. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:52004PC0177&qid =1409 771590751& rid=2 (Stand: 1.04.2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  242. EU-Parlament & Rat der EU (2006): Richtlinie 2006/43/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 17. Mai 2006 über Abschlussprüfungen von Jahresabschlüssen und konsolidierten Abschlüssen, zur Änderung der Richtlinien 78/660/EWG und 83/349/EWG des Rates und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 84/253/EWG des Rates, in: Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften vom 9.6.2006, L157, S. 87-107. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  243. EU-Parlament & Rat der EU (2014): Verordnung des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über spezifische Anforderungen an die Abschlussprüfung bei Unternehmen von öffentlichem Interesse und zur Aufhebung des Beschlusses 2005/909/EG der Kommission, Brüssel. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  244. Frankel, R. M./Johnson, M. F./Nelson K. K. (2002): The Relation between Auditors‘ Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, Supplement, S. 71-105. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  245. Grottel, B. (2014a): Kommentierung von § 285 HGB, in: Förschle, G., et al. (Hrsg.): Beck'scher Bilanz-Kommentar, 9. Auflage, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  246. Grottel, B. (2014b): Kommentierung von § 314 HGB, in: Förschle, G., et al. (Hrsg.): Beck'scher Bilanz-Kommentar, 9. Auflage, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  247. Heß, B./Stefani, U. (2012): Ökonomische Konsequenzen der Einschränkung von "Prüfung und Bera-tung aus einer Hand“, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 65, Nr. 22, S. 1177-1186. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  248. IDW RH HFA 1.006 (2005): IDW Rechnungslegungshinweis: Anhangangaben nach § 285 Satz 1 Nr. 17 HGB bzw. § 314 Abs. 1 Nr. 9 HGB über das Abschlussprüferhonorar, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 58, Nr. 22, S. 1232-1234. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  249. IDW RS HFA 36 (2010): IDW Stellungnahme zur Rechnungslegung: Anhangangaben nach §§ 285 Nr. 17, 314 Abs. 1 Nr. 9 HGB über das Abschlussprüferhonorar, in: IDW Fachnachrichten 6/2010, S. 245-247. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  250. IDW (2012): WP Handbuch 2012 – Wirtschaftsprüfung, Rechnungslegung, Beratung, Band 1, 14. Aufl., Düsseldorf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  251. IFAC (2010): Handbook of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  252. Kallunki, J.-P./Sahlstörm, P./Zerni, M. (2007): Propensity to Switch Auditors and Strictness of Legal Liability Environment: The Role of Audit Mispricing, in: International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 11, S. 165-185. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  253. Kessler, M. (2013): Kommentierung von § 285 HGB, in: Hennrichs, J., et al. (Hrsg.): Münchener Kom-mentar zum Bilanzrecht, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  254. Kling, A. (2011): Anhangangaben zur Honorierung des Abschlussprüfers nach dem BilMoG, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 64, Nr. 5, S. 209–219. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  255. Köhler, A. G./Marten, K.-U./Ratzinger, N./Wagner, M. (2010): Prüfungshonorare in Deutschland – Determinanten und Implikationen, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 80, Issue 1, S. 5-29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  256. Krauß, P. (2008): Publizität von Abschlussprüferhonoraren bei kapitalmarktorientierten Unterneh-men – Zielsetzung und Wirkung der Regelungen im Bilanzrechtsreformgesetz, Sternenfels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  257. Lenz, H./Bauer, M. (2004): Prüfungs- und Beratungshonorare von Abschlussprüfern deutscher bör-sennotierter Aktiengesellschaften, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 57, Nr. 18, S. 985-998. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  258. Lenz, H./Möller, M./Höhn, B. (2006): Offenlegung der Honorare für Abschlussprüferleistungen im Geschäftsjahr 2005 bei DAX-Unternehmen, in: Betriebs Berater, Jg. 61, Nr. 33, S. 1787–1793. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  259. Lenz, H./Ostrowski, M. (1999): Der Markt für Abschlussprüfungen bei börsennotierten Aktiengesellschaften, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 59, Nr. 3, S. 397-411. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  260. Menon, K./Wiliams, D. D. (2001): Long-Term Trends in Audit Fees, in: Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 20, No. 1, S. 115-136. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  261. Niehus, R. J. (2002): Corporate Governance: Das Honorar und der Abschlussprüfer – Stärkung der Unabhängigkeit durch Offenlegung?, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 55, Nr. 12, S. 616-625. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  262. Petersen, K./Zwirner, C. (2008a): Die Abschlussprüfung im Lichte des BilMoG – Aktualisierung und Internationalisierung, in: Steuern und Bilanzen, S. 50-57. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  263. Petersen, K./Zwirner, C. (2008b): Angabepflicht der Honoraraufwendungen für den Abschlussprüfer – Theoretische und empirische Betrachtungen der Offenlegungserfordernisse zur Stärkung der Prüferunabhängigkeit, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 61, Nr. 7, S. 279-291. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  264. Petersen, K./Zwirner, C. (2008c): Abschlussprüfung nach dem Regierungsentwurf zum BilMoG, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 61, Nr. 20, S. 967-973. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  265. Petersen, K./Zwirner, C./Boecker, C. (2010): Der Wirtschaftsprüfungsmarkt in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer Analyse in DAX, MDAX, SDAX und TecDAX, in: KoR – Zeitschrift für kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung, Jg. 10, Nr. 4, S. 217-224. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  266. Pfitzer, N./Oser, P./Orth, C. (2008): Reform des Aktien-, Bilanz- und Aufsichtsrechts: BilMoG, MoMiG, TUG, EHUG und weitere Reformgesetze, Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  267. Polt, N./Winter, T. (2004): Der Honoraranspruch des Abschlussprüfers, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 57, S. 1127-1135. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  268. Quick, R. (2006): Prüfung, Beratung und Unabhängigkeit des Abschlussprüfers – Eine Analyse der neuen Unabhängigkeitsnormen des HGB im Lichte empirischer Forschungsergebnisse, in: Betriebs-wirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, Jg. 58, Nr. 1, S. 42-61. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  269. Quick, R./Warming-Rasmussen B. (2009): Auditor Independence and the Provision of Non-Audit Services: Perceptions by Germany Investors, in: International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 14, No. 2, S. 141-162. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  270. Quick, R./Wolz, M./Seelbach, M. (1998): Die Struktur des Prüfungsmarktes für deutsche Aktiengesellschaften – Eine empirische Untersuchung der Konzentration auf dem deutschen Wirtschaftsprüfungsmarkt für Aktiengesellschaften, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 68, Nr. 8, S. 779-802. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  271. Reynolds, J. K./Deis Jr., D. R./Francis, J. R. (2004): Professional Service Fees and Auditor Objectivity, in: Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 23, No. 1, S. 29-52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  272. Sattler, M. (2011): Vereinbarkeit von Abschlussprüfung und Beratung – eine empirische Analyse zu den Beratungsleistungen deutscher Abschussprüfer und deren Auswirkungen auf das Ausmaß der Bilanzpolitik ihrer Mandanten, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  273. Schmidt, S./Heinz, S. (2014): Kommentierung von § 318 HGB, in: Förschle, G., et al. (Hrsg.): Beck'scher Bilanz-Kommentar, 9. Auflage, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  274. Seetharaman, A./Gul, F. A./Lynn, S. G. (2002): Litigation risk and audit fees: evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33, Issue 1, S. 91-115. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  275. Senger, T./Maier, C. (2013): Kommentierung von § 314 HGB, in: Hennrichs, J., et al. (Hrsg.): Münchener Kommentar zum Bilanzrecht, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  276. Simon, D. T./Francis, J. R. (1988): The Effects of Auditor Change on Audit Fees: Tests of Price Cutting and Price Recovers, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, S. 255-269. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  277. Simunic, D. A. (1980): The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence, in: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 161-190. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  278. Tate, S. L. (2007): Auditor Change and Auditor Choice in Nonprofit Organizations, in: Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Practice, Vol. 26, Issue 1, S. 47-70. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  279. Umlauf, S. J. (2013): Prüfungs- und Beratungshonorare von Konzernabschlussprüfern – Honorarde-terminanten und Unabhängigkeitswahrnehmungen auf dem deutschen Kapitalmarkt, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  280. Velte, P. (2009): Die Vereinbarung des Prüferhonorars durch Aufsichtsrat und Abschlussprüfer als Element der Corporate Governance – Eine normative und empirische Bestandsaufnahme für den deutschen Kapitalmarkt, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 62, Nr. 24, S. 1229–1233. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  281. Vogt, E. (2009): Abschlussprüferhaftung gegenüber Dritten in Deutschland und den USA, Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  282. Wollmert, P./Oser, R./Graupe, F. (2010): Anhangangaben zu den Abschlussprüferhonoraren und zu marktunüblichen Geschäften nach BilMoG, in: Steuern und Bilanzen, S. 123-130. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  283. WPK (2011): Ergebnisse der Honorarumfragen 2010/2011 der WPK. URL: http://www.wpk. de/mitglieder/praxishinweise/honorarumfrage/ (Stand: 1.04.2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  284. Woo, E-S./Koh, H. C. (2001): Factors associated with auditor changes: a Singapore study, in: Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 31, Issue 2, S. 133-144. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  285. Wulf, I. (2010): Aktuelle Neuerungen in der Anhangberichterstattung aus § 285 HGB nach dem BilMoG, in: Deutsche Steuer-Zeitung, Jg. 98, Nr. 4, S. 405–415. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  286. Zimmermann, R.-C. (2006): Gestaltungsspielräume bei Veröffentlichung von Abschlussprüferhonoraren im Rahmen des BilReG, in: Zeitschrift für kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung, S. 273–276. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  287. Zülch, H./Krauß, P./Pronobis, P. (2010): Die Entwicklung von Abschlussprüferhonoraren in Deutsch-land zwischen 2004 und 2008: Eine empirische Analyse ausgewählter Börsenindizes (DAX, MDAX, SDAX, TecDAX), in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 63, Nr. 8, S. 397-404. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-153
  288. Adner, R./Polos, L./Ryall, M. D./Sorenson, O. (2009): The case for formal theory, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34, S. 201-208. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  289. Albach, H. (1997): Gutenberg und die Zukunft der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Diskussionspaper Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  290. Alderson, D. L. (2008): Catching the “network science” bug: Insight and opportunity for the operations researcher, in: Operations Research, Vol. 56, S. 1047-1065. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  291. Anderson, C. (2006): The Long Tail, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  292. Audretsch, D. B. (1995): Innovation and industry evolution, Cambridge, MA. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  293. Balakrishnan, V. (1998): Dreams of a final theory – The search for the fundamental laws of nature. Book Review, URL: http://www.ias.ac.in/resonance/Feb1998/pdf/Feb1998BookReviews.pdf. Abfragedatum: 27.9.2014. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  294. Baldwin, C. Y./Bhattacharyya, S. (1991): Choosing the method of sale: A clinical study of conrail, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 30, S. 69-98. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  295. Barabási, A.-L. (2002): Linked: the new science of networks, Cambridge, MA. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  296. Barabási, A.-L. (2005): The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics, in: Nature, Vol. 435, S. 207-211. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  297. Bartunek, J. M. (2007): Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Towards a relational scholarship of integration, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, S. 1323-1333. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  298. Baum, J. A. C./McKelvey, B. (2006): Analysis of extremes in management studies, in: Ketchen, D. J./Bergh, D. D. (Hrsg.): Research methodology in strategy and management 3, Oxford, S. 123-197. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  299. Beckert, W./van Damme, E./Dewatripont, M. /Franks, J. /ten Kate, A. /Legros, P. (2009): Quantifying antitrust damages. Towards non-binding guidance for courts, Study prepared for the European Commission. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  300. Benbya, H./McKelvey, B. (2007): Using pareto-based science to enhance knowledge for practical relevance, Working paper, Montpellier. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  301. Boisot, M./McKelvey, B. (2012): Connectivity, extremes, and power laws: Towards a power-law science of organizational effectiveness, in: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 20, S. 119-133. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  302. Brickley, J. A./Zimmerman, J. L. (2010): Corporate governance myths: Comments on Armstrong, Guay, and Weber, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 50, S. 235-245. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  303. Castellano, C./Marsili, M./Vespignani, A. (2000): Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence, in: Physical Review Letters, Vol. 85, S. 3536-3539. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  304. Castillo, E./Hadi, A. S./Balakrishnan, N./Sarabia, J. M. (2005): Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science, Hoboken, NJ. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  305. Collins, J. (2001): Good to Great: Why some companies make the leap... And others don’t, New York, NY. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  306. Collins, J./Porras, J. I. (1994): Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies, New York, NY. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  307. Embrechts, P. (2004): Extremes in economics and the economics of extremes, in: Finkenstädt, B./Rootzén, H. (Hrsg.): Extreme Values in Finance, Telecommunications and the Environment, London, S. 169-183. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  308. Felin, T./Foss, N. (2009): Social reality, boundaries of self-fulfilling prophecy and economics, in: Organization Science, Vol. 20, S. 654-668. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  309. Fritz, W. (2002): Die Erfolgsfaktorenforschung – ein Misserfolg?, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 64, S. 623-625. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  310. Garud, R./Jain, S./Kumuraswamy, A. (2002): Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, S. 196-214. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  311. Garud, R./Kumaraswamy, A./Karnøe, P. (2010): Path dependence or path creation?, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47, S. 760-774. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  312. Ghoshal, S. (2005): Bad management theories are destroying good management practices, in: Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 4, S. 75-91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  313. Golden-Biddle, K./Locke, K. (2006), Composing qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  314. Gulati, R. (2007): Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, S. 775-782. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  315. Hambrick, D. C. (1990): The adolescence of strategic management, 1980-1985, in: Frederickson, J. W. (Hrsg.): Perspectives on strategic management, Grand Rapids, MI, S. 237-261. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  316. Hambrick, D. C. (1994): Presidential address: What if the Academy actually mattered?, in: Acade-my of Management Review, Vol. 19, S. 11-16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  317. Homburg, C./Krohmer, H. (2004): Die Fliegenpatsche als Instrument des wissenschaftlichen Dia-logs, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 64, S. 626-631. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  318. Kahn, W. A. (2007): Commentary: Positive relationships in groups and communities, in: Dutton, J. E./Ragins, B. R. (Hrsg.): Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and re-search foundation, Mahwah, NJ, S. 277-288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  319. Kappler, E. (1980): Brauchen wir eine neue Betriebswirtschaftslehre? Vorbemerkungen zur kriti-schen Betriebswirtschaftslehre, in: Koubek, N./Küller, H.-D./Scheibe-Lange, I. (Hrsg.): Betriebswirtschaftliche Probleme der Mitbestimmung, 2. Aufl., Köln, S. 177-201. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  320. Kappler, E. (2008): Kritische Betriebswirtschaftslehre – eine Episode im letzten Drittel des 20. Jahrhunderts?, URL: http://www.1968.uni-wuppertal.de/bilanz/kappler/kritische_bwl.pdf. Abfragedatum: 6.12.2014. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  321. Kieser, A./Leiner, L. (2007): Why collaboration with practitioners is often referred to in manage-ment science as a remedy for the rigor-relevance-gap and why this is not a promising idea, Paper presented at the Third Organization Studies Summer Workshop, Crete. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  322. Kieser, A./Leiner, L. (2010): Kollaborative Managementforschung – eine Brücke über den Rigor-Relevance Gap?, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 80, S. 89-113. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  323. Kieser, A./Nicolai, A./Seidel, D. (2015): The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific program, in: Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 9, S. 143-233. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  324. Kliemt, H. (2008): Grundzüge der Wissenschaftstheorie – Betriebswirtschaftlich, Systematisch und Historisch, Frankfurt. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  325. Koenker, R./Bassett, G. (1978): Regression quantiles, in: Econometrica, Jg. 46, S. 33-50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  326. Koenker, R./Hallock, K. F. (2001): Quantile regression, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, S. 143-156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  327. Kuhn, T. S. (1977): The essential tension, Chicago, IL. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  328. Lampel, J./Shamsie, J./Shapira, Z. (2009): Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning, in: Organization Science, Vol. 20, S. 835-845. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  329. Latham, G. P. (2007): A speculative perspective on the transfer of behavioral science findings to the workplace: “The times they are a-changin”, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, S. 1027-1032. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  330. Lowenstein, R. (2001): When Genius failed, New York, NJ. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  331. Luhmann, N. (1998): Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  332. Luhmann, N. (2005a): Communication barriers in management consulting, in: Becker, K./Seidl H. D. (Hrsg.): Niklas Luhmann and organization studies, Kopenhagen, S. 215-247. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  333. Luhmann, N. (2005b): Theoretische und praktische Probleme der anwendungsbezogenen Sozialwissenschaften, in: Luhmann, N. (Hrsg.): Soziologische Aufklärung. Band 3: Soziales System, Gesellschaft und Organisation, Wiesbaden, S. 369-385. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  334. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982): The fractal geometry of nature, New York, NJ. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  335. March, J. G./Sutton, R. I. (1997), Organizational performance as a dependent variable, in: Organization Science, Vol. 8, S. 698-706. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  336. Markides, C. C. (2007): In search of ambidextrous professors, in: Academy of Management Jour-nal, Vol. 50, S. 762-768. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  337. Martin, A./Nienhüser, W. (1998): Die Erklärung der Personalpolitik von Organisationen, in: Martin, A./Nienhüser, W. (Hrsg.): Personalpolitik. Wissenschaftliche Erklärung der Personalpolitik, München, S. 9-27. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  338. McGahan, A. M. (2007): Academic research that matters to managers: On zebras, dogs, lemmings, hammers, and turnips, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, S. 748-753. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  339. McKelvey, B./Andriani, P. (2005): Why Gaussian statistics are mostly wrong for strategic organization, in: Strategic Organization, Vol. 3, S. 219-228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  340. McKelvey, B./Andriani, P./Boisot, M./Lewin, A. (2014): Why pareto-based organization science is necessary, in: Organization Science, forthcoming. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  341. Mowday, R. T. (1997): Presidential address: Reaffirming our scholarly values, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, S. 335-345. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  342. Newman, M. E. J. (2005): Power laws, pareto distributions and Zipf’s law, in: Contemporary Physics, Vol. 46, S. 323-351. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  343. Nicolai, A./Kieser, A. (2002): Trotz eklatanter Erfolglosigkeit: Die Erfolgsfaktorenforschung weiter auf Erfolgskurs, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 6, S. 579-596. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  344. Nicolai, A./Kieser, A. (2004): Von Konsensgenerierungsmaschinen, Nebelkerzen und „the Operation called ‚Verstehen’“, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Jg. 64, S. 631-635. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  345. Nicolai, A./Seidl, D. (2010): That’s relevant! Different forms of practical relevance in management science, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 31, S. 1257-1285. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  346. Peters, T. J./Waterman, R. H. (1982): In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies, New York, NY. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  347. Priem, R. I./Butler, J. E. (2001): Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, S. 22-40. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  348. Rerup, C. (2009): Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crisis, in: Organization Science, Vol. 20, S. 876-893. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  349. Roth, A. (1991): Game theory as a part of empirical economics, in: The Economic Journal, Vol. 101, S. 107-114. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  350. Rynes, S. (2007): Editor’s foreword: Tackling the “great divide” between research production and dissemination in human resource management, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, S. 985-986. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  351. Schrödinger, E. (1929): Was ist ein Naturgesetz?, in: Naturwissenschaften, Jg. 17, S. 9-11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  352. Shalizi, C. R./Tozier, W. A. (1999): A simple model of the evolution of simple models of evolution, arXiv:adap-org/9910002. URL: www.arxiv.org. Abfragedatum: 7.12.2014. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  353. Shapiro, D. L./Kirkman, B. L./Courtney, H. G. (2007): Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, S. 249-266. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  354. Shleifer, A./Vishny, RW (1997): Limits of arbitrage, in: Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, S. 35-55. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  355. Simon, H. (2008): Betriebswirtschaftliche Wissenschaft und Unternehmenspraxis: Erfahrungen aus dem Marketing-Bereich, in: ZfbF, Jg. 60, S. 73-93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  356. Van de Ven, A. (2007): Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research, Ox-ford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  357. Van de Ven, A. H./Johnson, P. E. (2006): Knowledge for theory and practice, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, S. 802-821. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  358. Vermeulen, F. (2007): “I shall not remain insignificant”: Adding a second loop to matter more, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, S. 754-761. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  359. Vergne, J./Durand, R. (2010): The missing link between the theory and empirics of path depend-ence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47, S. 736-759. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  360. Weick, K. E. (2005): The pragmatics of “really mattering” on policy issues: William Ouchi as exem-plar, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, S. 986-988. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  361. Weinberg, S. (1994): Dreams of a final theory: The scientist’s search for the ultimate laws of na-ture, New York, NY. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187
  362. Wieland, B. (1985): Towards an economic theory of scientific revolutions: A cynical view?, in: Erkenntnis, Jg. 23, S. 79-95. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2016-2-187

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media