Breaking Barriers: Accelerating the Transition to a Circular Economy

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: Swiss Journal of Business Volume 79 (2025), Issue 3
Open Access Full access

Swiss Journal of Business

Volume 79 (2025), Issue 3

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2025
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
ISSN-Print
2944-3741

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 79 (2025), Issue 3

Breaking Barriers: Accelerating the Transition to a Circular Economy

Authors:
ISSN-Print
2944-3741
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
Preview:

Global resource consumption is continuously increasing, accelerating the transgression of planetary boundaries. Solving the related environmental problems requires targeted action and a systemic transition from the prevailing linear economic model to a circular one. This paper adopts a systemic approach to identify the transition barriers across relevant levels, including product, business, ecosystem, industry, and society/regulation systems. It contributes to research by structuring and mapping the barriers based on eight underlying mechanisms. These mechanisms help explain how the barriers function and why they hinder the transition of socio-technical regimes from linear to circular ones. For example, the Prisoner’s Dilemma describes how short-term self-interests often overrule collective benefits and leads to suboptimal outcomes. The mechanisms also provide insights into potential solutions for addressing the barriers and accelerating the implementation of a circular economy. Illustrative examples from practice are introduced to demonstrate that “breaking barriers” is both possible and necessary—primarily through various forms of collaboration.

Bibliography

  1. Agamuthu, P., & Visvanathan, C. (2014). Extended producers’ responsibility schemes for used beverage carton recycling. Waste Management and Research, 32(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13517611 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  2. Ahmadov, T., Durst, S., Gerstlberger, W., & Kraut, E. (2023). SMEs on the way to a circular economy: insights from a multi-perspective review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00380-2 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  3. Akemu, O., Whiteman, G., & Kennedy, S. (2016). Social enterprise emergence from social movement activism: The Fairphone case. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 846–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12208 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  4. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  5. Arranz, C. F. A., Arroyabe, M. F., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2024). Organisational transformation toward circular economy in SMEs. The effect of internal barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142307 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  6. Awan, U., Sroufe, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2038–2060. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2731 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  7. Axelrod, R. (1980). Effective choice in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1), 3–25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  8. Ayres, R. U. (1996). Limits to the growth paradigm. Ecological Economics, 19, 117–134. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  9. Ayres, R. U. (1997). Industrial Metabolism: Work in progress. INSEAD Working Paper Series. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  10. Bakker, C., Hollander, D., van Hinte, E., & Zijlstra, Y. (2014). Products that last: Product design for circular business models. TU Delft Library. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  11. Barros, M., & Dimla, E. (2021). From planned obsolescence to the circular economy in the smartphone industry: An evolution of strategies embodied in product features. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.422 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  12. Bateman, I. J., & Mace, G. M. (2020). The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making. Nature Sustainability, 3(10), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  13. Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge university press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  14. Berardi, P. C., & de Brito, R. P. (2021). Supply chain collaboration for a circular economy-From transition to continuous improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, 129511. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  15. Berardi, P. C., & Peregrino de Brito, R. (2021). Supply chain collaboration for a circular economy – From transition to continuous improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129511 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  16. Berkhout, F. (2002). Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 12(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00025-5 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  17. Bocken, N. M. P., & Konietzko, J. (2022). Circular business model innovation in consumer-facing corporations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122076 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  18. Bocken, N. M. P., Pauw, I. De, Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  19. Bocken, N. M. P., Schuit, C. S. C., & Kraaijenhagen, C. (2018). Experimenting with a circular business model: Lessons from eight cases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.02.001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  20. Boyer, R. H. W., Hunka, A. D., Linder, M., Whalen, K. A., & Habibi, S. (2021). Product labels for the Circular Economy: Are customers willing to pay for circular? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.010 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  21. Bressanelli, G., Saccani, N., Perona, M., & Baccanelli, I. (2020). Towards circular economy in the household appliance industry: An overview of cases. Resources, 9(11), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9110128 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  22. Brown, P., Bocken, N., & Balkenende, R. (2020). How do companies collaborate for circular oriented innovation? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041648 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  23. Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., & Pettersen, I. N. (2018). Consumption in the circular economy: A literature review. Sustainability, 10(8), 2758. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  24. Cantú, A., Aguiñaga, E., & Scheel, C. (2021). Learning from failure and success: The challenges for circular economy implementation in SMEs in an emerging economy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031529 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  25. Chander, P., & Tulkens, H. (1997). The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities. In International Journal of Game Theory (Vol. 26). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  26. Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223–2247. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1863 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  27. Cho, Y.-N., Thyroff, A., Rapert, M. I., Park, S.-Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). To be or not to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1052–1059. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  28. Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  29. Circle Economy. (2025). The Circularity Gap Report 2025. https://www.circularity-gap.world/2025 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  30. Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  31. Collste, D., Cornell, S. E., Randers, J., Rockström, J., & Stoknes, P. E. (2021). Human well-being in the Anthropocene: Limits to growth. Global Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.26 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  32. Corso, M., & Pellegrini, L. (2007). Continuous and discontinuous innovation: Overcoming the Innovator Dilemma. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00459.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  33. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Farberll, S., Grassot, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O, R. V, Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., & Suttonllll, P. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  34. Costanza, R., Hart, M., Talberth, J., & Posner, S. (2009). Beyond GDP: The need for new measures of progress. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/iss_pub Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  35. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY (Vol. 75, Issue 2). The American Economic Review. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  36. de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  37. Delucchi, M. A. (2000). Environmental externalities of motor-vehicle use in the US. In Source: Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (Vol. 34, Issue 2). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  38. Desing, H., Braun, G., & Hischier, R. (2020). Ecological resource availability: A method to estimate resource budgets for a sustainable economy. Global Sustainability, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.26 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  39. Desing, H., Braun, G., & Hischier, R. (2021). Resource pressure – A circular design method. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 164, 105179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105179 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  40. Desing, H., Brunner, D., Takacs, F., Nahrath, S., Frankenberger, K., & Hischier, R. (2020). A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104673 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  41. Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization Studies, 26(3), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050873 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  42. Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41–52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  43. Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2020). Evaluating the adoption of circular economy practices in industrial supply chains: An empirical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122966 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  44. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1162/108819806775545321/abstract Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  45. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, & IDEO. (2020). The Circular Design Guide. https://www.circulardesignguide.com/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  46. Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2018). Introducing a Circular Economy: New thinking with new managerial and policy implications. California Management Review, 60(3), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618764691 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  47. European Commission. (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_en Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  48. Evertsen, P. H., & Knotten, V. (2024). Toward a collaborative circular ecosystem within the built environment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 52, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.019 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  49. Fenichel, E. P., & Abbott, J. K. (2014). Natural Capital: From metaphor to measurement. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1(1/2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/676034 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  50. Fischer, A., & Pascucci, S. (2017). Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.038 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  51. Flynn, A., & Hacking, N. (2019). Setting standards for a circular economy: A challenge too far for neoliberal environmental governance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 1256–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.257 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  52. Frankenberger, K., Mayer, H., Reiter, A., & Schmidt, M. (2020). The digital transformer’s dilemma: How to energize your core business while building disruptive products and services. John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  53. Frankenberger, K., Takacs, F., & Stechow, R. (2021). A step toward making your company more sustainable. HBR.Org. https://hbr.org/2021/01/a-step-toward-making-your-company-more-sustainable Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  54. Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015). Managing co-creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British Journal of Management, 26, 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12087 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  55. Gallego-Schmid, A., Chen, H. M., Sharmina, M., & Mendoza, J. M. F. (2020). Links between circular economy and climate change mitigation in the built environment. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 260). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121115 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  56. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  57. Geels, F. W. (2006). Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: A multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850–1930). Technology in Society, 28(4), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.09.006 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  58. Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  59. Geels, F. W. (2022). Causality and explanation in socio-technical transitions research: Mobilising epistemological insights from the wider social sciences. Research Policy, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104537 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  60. Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  61. Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 712–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  62. Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Soufani, K. (2020). Circular business models: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  63. Geissdoerfer, M., Santa-Maria, T., Kirchherr, J., & Pelzeter, C. (2023). Drivers and barriers for circular business model innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3814–3832. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3339 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  64. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  65. George, B., Pandey, S. K., Steijn, B., Decramer, A., & Audenaert, M. (2021). Red tape, organizational performance, and employee outcomes: Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and research agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13327 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  66. Godinho Filho, M., Gonella, J. dos S. L., Latan, H., & Ganga, G. M. D. (2024). Awareness as a catalyst for sustainable behaviors: A theoretical exploration of planned behavior and value-belief-norms in the circular economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122181 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  67. Goering, G. E. (1997). Product durability and moral hazard. Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 399–411. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  68. Goldsmith, R. E., & Clark, R. A. (2012). Materialism, status consumption, and consumer independence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152(1), 43–60. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  69. Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018a). A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 278–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  70. Grafström, J., & Aasma, S. (2021). Breaking circular economy barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126002 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  71. Grillo, F., Wiegmann, P. M., de Vries, H. J., Bekkers, R., Tasselli, S., Yousefi, A., & van de Kaa, G. (2024). Standardization: Research trends, current debates, and interdisciplinarity. Academy of Management Annals, 18(2), 788–830. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  72. Guldmann, E., & Huulgaard, R. D. (2020). Barriers to circular business model innovation: A multiple-case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118160 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  73. Gupta, S., Chen, H., Hazen, B. T., Kaur, S., & Santibañez Gonzalez, E. D. R. (2019). Circular economy and big data analytics: A stakeholder perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.030 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  74. Hamzaoui Essoussi, L., & Linton, J. D. (2010). New or recycled products: How much are consumers willing to pay? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011063358 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  75. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-1224%28198404%2949%3A2%3C149%3ASIAOC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  76. Hansen, E. G., & Schmitt, J. C. (2021). Orchestrating cradle-to-cradle innovation across the value chain: Overcoming barriers through innovation communities, collaboration mechanisms, and intermediation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(3), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13081 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  77. Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 198–2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  78. Hart, J., Adams, K., Giesekam, J., Tingley, D. D., & Pomponi, F. (2019). Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: The case of the built environment. Procedia CIRP, 80, 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  79. Henrysson, M., & Nuur, C. (2021). The role of institutions in creating Circular Economy pathways for regional development. Journal of Environment and Development, 30(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496521991876 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  80. Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth Possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  81. Hina, M., Chauhan, C., Kaur, P., Kraus, S., & Dhir, A. (2022). Drivers and barriers of circular economy business models: Where we are now, and where we are heading. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130049 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  82. Ho, C. H., Böhm, S., & Monciardini, D. (2022). The collaborative and contested interplay between business and civil society in circular economy transitions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(6), 2714–2727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  83. Hofmann, F. (2019). Circular business models: Business approach as driver or obstructer of sustainability transitions? Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.115 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  84. Hofmann, F., & Jaeger-Erben, M. (2020). Organizational transition management of circular business model innovations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2770–2788. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2542 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  85. Hofmann Trevisan, A., Gonçalves Castro, C., Augusto De Vasconcelos Gomes, L., & Mascarenhas, J. (2023). Circular ecosystem structure and orchestration: outlining actions to innovate, integrate, and invest. Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, 897–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.90 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  86. Hummel, K., & Jobst, D. (2024). An overview of corporate sustainability reporting legislation in the European Union. Accounting in Europe. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2024.2312145 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  87. Hummen, T., & Desing, H. (2021). When to replace products with which (circular) strategy? An optimization approach and lifespan indicator. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105704 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  88. Ianole-Călin, R., Francioni, B., Masili, G., Druică, E., & Goschin, Z. (2020). A cross-cultural analysis of how individualism and collectivism impact collaborative consumption. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104762 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  89. IMF. (2025). Fossil fuel subsidies. https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/climate-change/energy-subsidies Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  90. International Resource Panel. (2024). Global Resources Outlook 2024. https://www.unep.org/resources/Global-Resource-Outlook-2024 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  91. Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow. Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  92. Jaeger, B., & Upadhyay, A. (2020). Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(4), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0047 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  93. Jäger-Roschko, M., & Petersen, M. (2022). Advancing the circular economy through information sharing: A systematic literature review. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 369). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133210 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  94. Jain, S. (2019). Time inconsistency and product design: A strategic analysis of feature creep. Marketing Science, 38(5), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1170 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  95. Kallis, G. (2017). Radical dematerialization and degrowth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 375(2095). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0383 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  96. Kanda, W., Geissdoerfer, M., & Hjelm, O. (2021). From circular business models to circular business ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(6), 2814–2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2895 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  97. Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  98. Khan, A. A., & Abonyi, J. (2022). Information sharing in supply chains – Interoperability in an era of circular economy. In Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain (Vol. 5). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100074 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  99. Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  100. Kissling, R., Coughlan, D., Fitzpatrick, C., Boeni, H., Luepschen, C., Andrew, S., & Dickenson, J. (2013). Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 80, 21–31. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  101. Kitching, J., Hart, M., & Wilson, N. (2015). Burden or benefit? Regulation as a dynamic influence on small business performance. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(2), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613493454 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  102. Köhler, J., Sönnichsen, S. D., & Beske‐Jansen, P. (2022). Towards a collaboration framework for circular economy: The role of dynamic capabilities and open innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(6), 2700–2713. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  103. Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020a). A tool to analyze, ideate and develop circular innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(417). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010417 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  104. Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020b). Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  105. Kumar, V., Sezersan, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Gonzalez, E. D. R. S., & AL-Shboul, M. A. (2019). Circular economy in the manufacturing sector: benefits, opportunities and barriers. Management Decision, 57(4), 1067–1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2018-1070 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  106. Lahti, T., Wincent, J., & Parida, V. (2018). A definition and theoretical review of the circular economy, value creation, and sustainable business models: Where are we now and where should research move in the future? In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 10, Issue 8). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082799 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  107. Lauten-Weiss, J., Friege, H., Westphal, I., & Brinker, J. (2024). Dynamics of business models in Circular Economy: Shifting challenges in pilot projects. Sustainability & Circularity NOW, 1(continuous publication). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  108. Llorente-González, L. J., & Vence, X. (2020). How labour-intensive is the circular economy? A policy-orientated structural analysis of the repair, reuse and recycling activities in the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105033. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  109. Löfgren, K.-G., Persson, T., & Weibull, J. W. (2002). Markets with asymmetric information: The contributions of George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(2), 195–211. https://about.jstor.org/terms Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  110. Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  111. Luchs, M. G., Brower, J., & Chitturi, R. (2012). Product choice and the importance of aesthetic design given the emotion-laden trade-off between sustainability and functional performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00970.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  112. Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. In Journal of Marketing (Vol. 74, Issue 5). https://scholarworks.wm.edu/businesspubs Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  113. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2018). A review and typology of Circular Economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 00(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12763 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  114. Lumpkin, G. T., & Brigham, K. H. (2011). Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1149–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00495.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  115. Magnusson, T., & Werner, V. (2023). Conceptualisations of incumbent firms in sustainability transitions: Insights from organisation theory and a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(2), 903–919. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  116. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  117. Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2006). Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? Research Policy, 35(5), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.008 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  118. Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U., Vivien, F. D., & Zaccai, E. (2010). Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  119. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  120. Meade, J. E. (1973). The Theory of Economic Externalities. A. W. Sijthoff, 1973, 92 p., DFL 22.00. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  121. Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  122. Michaud, C., & Llerena, D. (2011). Green consumer behaviour: An experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 408–420. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  123. Moreau, V., Sahakian, M., van Griethuysen, P., & Vuille, F. (2017). Coming full circle: Why social and institutional dimensions matter for the Circular Economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  124. Morseletto, P. (2020). Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(4), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12987 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  125. Morseletto, P. (2023). Sometimes linear, sometimes circular: States of the economy and transitions to the future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136138 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  126. Nag, U., Sharma, S. K., & Kumar, V. (2022). Multiple life-cycle products: A review of antecedents, outcomes, challenges, and benefits in a Circular Economy. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(3), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2021.2020219 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  127. Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 36(1), 48–49. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  128. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  129. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. In Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 28, pp. 185–206). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  130. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  131. Özkan, P., & Karataş Yücel, E. (2020). Linear Economy to Circular Economy. In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Development and Opportunities in Circular Economy (pp. 61–86). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5116-5.ch004 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  132. Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J., & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  133. Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 974–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309360280 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  134. Paha, J. (2023). Sustainability agreements and first mover disadvantages. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 19(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhad007 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  135. Parida, V., Burström, T., Visnjic, I., & Wincent, J. (2019). Orchestrating industrial ecosystem in circular economy: A two-stage transformation model for large manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 101(January), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.006 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  136. Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  137. Pavel, S. (2018). Circular Economy: The beauty ofcircularity in value chain. Journal of Economics and Business, 1(4), 584–598. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.01.04.52 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  138. Peng, B., & Shen, X. (2024). Does environmental regulation affect Circular Economy performance? Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114406 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  139. Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00753.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  140. Pickman, H. A. (1999). The effect of environmental regulation on environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7(4), 223–233. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  141. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. In Source: The American Political Science Review (Vol. 94, Issue 2). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  142. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain – Policy report. In PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (Issue 2544). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  143. Pretner, G., Darnall, N., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2021). Are consumers willing to pay for circular products? The role of recycled and second-hand attributes, messaging, and third-party certification. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105888 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  144. Quairel‐Lanoizelée, F. (2011). Are competition and corporate social responsibility compatible? Society and Business Review, 6(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465681111105850 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  145. Raworth, K. (2017). Die Donut-Ökonomie. Hanser. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  146. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Drüke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., Von Bloh, W., Feulner, G., Fiedler, S., Gerten, D., Gleeson, T., Hofmann, M., Huiskamp, W., Kummu, M., Mohan, C., Nogués-Bravo, D., … Rockström, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9. https://www.science.org Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  147. Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological Change. In Human Choice and Climate Change (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  148. Ritzén, S., & Sandström, G. Ö. (2017). Barriers to the Circular Economy – integration of perspectives and domains. Procedia CIRP, 64, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  149. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Kafyeke, T., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., & Ioannou, A. (2015). The Circular Economy: Barriers and opportunities for SMEs. Ceps Working Document, 412. https://www.ceps.eu/publications/circular-economy-barriers-and-opportunities-smes Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  150. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., & Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. (2016). Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability, 8(11), 1212. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  151. Rizzati, M., & Landoni, M. (2024). A systematic review of agent-based modelling in the circular economy: Insights towards a general model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 69, 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2024.03.013 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  152. Robèrt, K. H., & Broman, G. (2017). Prisoners’ dilemma misleads business and policy making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.069 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  153. Rockström, J., Steffen, W. L., Noone, K., Persson, A., & Chapin III, F. S. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  154. Rosenschöld, J., Rozema, J. G., & Frye-Levine, L. A. (2014). Institutional inertia and climate change: A review of the new institutionalist literature. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(5), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.292 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  155. Ross, S. A. (1973). The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem (Vol. 63, Issue 2). American Economic Association. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  156. Salmenperä, H., Pitkänen, K., Kautto, P., & Saikku, L. (2021). Critical factors for enhancing the circular economy in waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124339. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  157. Santa-Maria, T., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2021). Framing and assessing the emergent field of business model innovation for the circular economy: A combined literature review and multiple case study approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 872–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.037 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  158. Saracevic, S., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Wu, T. (2022). How normative appeals influence pro-environmental behavior: The role of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131086 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  159. Sarja, M., Onkila, T., & Mäkelä, M. (2021). A systematic literature review of the transition to the circular economy in business organizations: Obstacles, catalysts and ambivalences. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 286). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125492 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  160. Schmelzer, M. (2015). The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmans Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Full download (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media