Ist der partielle Entzug des Sorgerechts zur Durchsetzung der Schulpflicht konventionsmäßig? Eine Analyse der Entscheidung Wunderlich v. Germany

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Issue 4
Open Access Full access

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien

Volume 22 (2019), Issue 4

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2019
ISSN-Online
2942-3589
ISSN-Print
1435-439X

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 22 (2019), Issue 4

Ist der partielle Entzug des Sorgerechts zur Durchsetzung der Schulpflicht konventionsmäßig? Eine Analyse der Entscheidung Wunderlich v. Germany

Authors:
ISSN-Print
1435-439X
ISSN-Online
2942-3589
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. BACK, MARTEN, ‘Kamer stemit in met alsnog ratifeceren Oekraineverdrag’, NRC, 23/02/2017, available at: https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/02/23/kamer-stemt-na-10-maanden-debat-in-met-oekraineverdrag-a1547441 (18/05/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  2. BEHSUDI, ADAM ET AL., ‘Trump gets trade win with new NAFTA deal’, Politico, 01/10/2018, available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/us-reaches-nafta-deal-with-canada-providing-trump-crucial-trade-win-mexico-lighthizer/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=48df04fca7-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_10_01_04_25&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-48df04fca7-190009785 (08/10/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  3. BODE, THILO, ‘Trade by the People, for the People’, Politico, 12/02/2018, available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/opinion-trade-by-the-people-for-the-people/ (14/04/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  4. BUNGENBERG, MARC, ‘Die Gemeinsame Handelspolitik, parlamentarische Beteiligung und das Singapur Gutachten des EuGH’, in: Kadelbach, Stefan (ed.), ‘Die Welt und Wir: Die AUßENBEZIEHUNGEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION’, 2017, pp. 133-150 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  5. CREMONA, MARISE, ‘A Quiet Revolution: The Common Commercial Policy Six Years After the Treaty of Lisbon’, SIEPS, 2017, Vol. 32, Issue 2 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  6. CRESPY, AMANDINE, ‘CETA, Wallonia and sovereignty in Europe’, 28/10/2016, available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/opinion/ceta-wallonia-and-sovereignty-in-europe/ (11/08/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  7. GOA, HENRY, ‘What is “Socialist Market Economy”?’, IELP Blog, 29/07/2018, available at: http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2018/07/index.html (06/09/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  8. GREIVE, MARTIN; TAUBER, ANDRE, ‘”Schnurzegel” – Juncker erzürnt deutsche Politiker‘, Die Welt (Berlin, 29 June 2016), available at: https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article156690315/Schnurzegal-Juncker-erzuernt-deutsche-Politiker.html (11/10/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  9. GUARASCIO, FRANCESCO; BLENKINSOP, PHILIP, ‘Italy in no rush to reject EU-Canada trade deal: farm minister’, Reuters, 16/07/2018, available at: https:// www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-canada-italy/italy-in-no-rush-to-reject-eu-canada-trade-deal-farm-minister-idUSKBN1K61IT (31/08/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  10. GÜNTHER, VALENTIN, ‘Der Vorschlag der Europäischen Union für eine Verordnung zur Schaffung eines Rahmens zur Überprüfung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen in der Europäischen Union’, Essays on Transnational Economic Law, 2018, Vol. 157 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  11. HOFFMEISTER, FRANK, ‘Of transferred competence, Institutional Balance and Judicial Autonomy – Constitutional Developments in Lisbon’, in: Czuczai, Jenö; Naert, Frederik (eds.), The EU as a Global Actor – Bridging Legal Theory and Practice, Leiden, 2017, pp. 309-338 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  12. HOFFMEISTER, FRANK, Article 17, in: Dörr, Oliver; Schmalenbach, Kirstin (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of TreatieS – A Commentary, 2018 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  13. JACKSON, JOHN H., World Trade and the Law of GATT, 1969 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  14. JUNG, NICOLAS; HAZARIKA, ANGSHUMAN, ‘Trade Wars are Easy to Win – National Security and Safeguards as the new weapon’, ZeuS, 2018, Vol. 1, pp. 1-24 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  15. JINPING, XI, ‘Jointly Shoulder Responsibilities of Our Times, Promote Global Growth’, World Economic Forum Davos, 2017, available at: http://www.china.or g.cn/node_7247529/content_40569136.htm (06/09/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  16. KLEIMANN, DAVID; KÜBECK, GESA, ‘The Signing, Provisional Application, and Conclusion of Trade and Investment Agreements in the EU – The Case of CETA and Opinion 2/15’, (2016:58) EUI WP RSCAS Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  17. KLEIMANN, DAVID; KÜBECK, GESA, ‘The Singapore Opinion or the End of Mixity as We Know It’, VerfBlog, 23/05/2017, available at: https://verfassungsblo g.de/the-singapore-opinion-or-the-end-of-mixity-as-we-know-it/ (20/06/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  18. KRUGMAN, PAUL, ‘Thinking about a Trade War (Very Wonkish)’, New York Times, 17/06/2018, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/17/opinion/t hinking-about-a-trade-war-very-wonkish.html (30/08/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  19. KUIJPER PIETER-JAN, ‘Of ‘Mixity’ and ‘Double Hatting: EU External Relations Law Explained’, Inaugural Lecture University of Amsterdam, 2008 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  20. KUIJPER PIETER-JAN, ‘Post-CETA: How we got there and how to go on’, ACELG Blog, 28 October 2016, available at: https://acelg.blogactiv.eu/2016/10/28/post-ce ta-how-we-got-there-and-how-to-go-on-by-pieter-jan-kuijper (18/04/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  21. LANZ, MARTIN, ‘Trump will den Handel verwalten, nicht fördern’, NZZ, 01/10/2018, available at: https://www.nzz.ch/wirtschaft/trump-will-den-handel-verwalten-nicht-foerdern-ld.1424807 (09/10/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  22. LESTER, SIMON, ‘Will anyone file a WTO Complaint against the KORUS steel quotas?’, IELP Blog, 28/03/2018, available at: http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2018/03/will-anyone-file-a-wto-complaint-against-the-korus-steel-quot as.html (06/05/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  23. LESTER, SIMON, ‘Litigating GATT Article XXI: the U.S. View of the Scope of Exception’, IELP Blog, 19/03/2018, available at: http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2018/03/litigating-gatt-article-xxi-the-us-view-of-the-scope-of-the-exce ption.html (06/05/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  24. MAVROIDIS, PETROS C., ‘The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, 2005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  25. MAVROIDIS, PETROS C., ‘Guest Post: From Roosevelt to Reagan to Trump: the Decay of U.S. Internationalism’, IELP Blog, 13/09/2018, available at: http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2018/09/guest-post-from-roosevelt-to-reagan-to-trump-the-decay-of-us-internationalism.html (19/09/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  26. MAYER, FRANZ C., ‘Rechtliche Aspekte des Freihandelsabkommens EU – Kanada (CETA)’, 2014, Deutscher Bundestag 18. WP Ausschussdrucksache 18(9)3001, available at: https://www.bundestag.de/blob/348398/f864dce4b150e7f9af971286222c0c53/franz-c--mayer--uni-bielefeld-data.pdf (16/05/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  27. MICKLETHWAIT, JOHN ET AL., ‘Trump threatens to pull U.S. out of WTO if it doesn’t ‘Shape up’’, Bloomberg, 30/08/2018, available at: https://www.bloomberg Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  28. .com/news/articles/2018-08-30/trump-says-he-will-pull-u-s-out-of-wto-if-they-don-t-shape-up (31/08/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  29. NASRALLA SHADIA; BACZYNSKA, GABRIELA, ‘Austria says it will start ‘conflict’ in EU about Canada trade deal’, Reuters, 01/09/2016, available at: https://w ww.reuters.com/article/us-europe-trade-canada-austria/austria-says-will-start-conflict-in-eu-about-canada-trade-deal-idUSKCN1173Q4 (11/08/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  30. OROSZ, MARTA ET AL., ‘« Inside CETA », episode 6: is CETA unstoppable?’, Le Monde, 7 November 2016, available at: http://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/art icle/2016/11/14/inside-ceta-episode-6-is-ceta-unstoppable_5030670_4355770.htm l#7QM2GMMFwUAoe2sA.99 (10/08/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  31. PETTER BRIAN; QUICK, REINHARD, ‘The Politics of TDI and the Different Views in EU Member States – Necessary Safety-Valves or Luxurious Rent-Seeking Device?’, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Hahn, Michael; Hermann, Christoph; Müller-Ibold, Till (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law, Special Issue: The Future of Trade Defence Instruments, 2018, pp. 17-42 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  32. ROSAS, ALLAN, ‘The European Union and Mixed Agreements’, in: Dashwood, Alan; Hillion, Christopher (eds.), The General law of E.C. External Relations, 2000, pp. 200-220 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  33. SENTI, RICHARD, ‘GATT – Allgemeines Zoll- und Handelsabkommen’, 1986 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  34. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN, ‘Ganz, aber doch nur teilweise – die Beteiligung des Deutschen Bundestages an gemischten völkerrechtlichen Abkommen’, VerfBlog, 09/02/2016, available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/ganz-aber-doch-nur-teilweise-die-beteiligung-des-deutschen-bundestages-an-gemischten-voelkerrechtlichen-a bkommen-der-eu/ (16/04/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  35. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN; NOWROT, KARSTEN, ‘CETA an der Leine des Bundesverfassungsgerichts: zum schmalen Grad zwischen Ultra-vires-Kontrolle und Ultravires-Handeln’, EuR, 2017, Vol. 52, pp. 137-154 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  36. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN; SACHER, VINCENT, ‘Stahl und Whiskey – Transatlantischer Handelskrieg als Bedrohung der Welthandelsordnung’, PPTEL, 2018, Vol. 48 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  37. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN; SACHER, VINCENT, ‘The New Anti-Dumping Methodology of the European Union – A Breach of WTO Law?’, Essays on Transnational Economic Law, 2018, Vol. 153 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  38. TROPEANO, MAURIZIO, ‘Non ratificheremo il trattato Ceta. Altri ci seguiranno’, La Stampa, 14/06/2018, available at: http://www.lastampa.it/2018/06/14/itali a/non-ratificheremo-il-trattato-ceta-altri-ci-seguiranno-vHOuiRxI91ipD0zYJfG 0NM/pagina.html (15/06/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  39. VAN DER LOO, GUILLAUME, ‘CETA’s signature: 38 statements, a joint interpretative instrument and an uncertain future’, CEPS Commentary, 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  40. VAN DER LOO, GUILLAUME, ‘The Dutch Referendum on the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, Legal options for navigating a tricky and awkward situation’, CEPS Commentary, 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  41. VAN DER LOO, GUILLAUME, ‘The Court’s Opinion on the ET-Singapore FTA: Throwing off the shackles of mixity?’, CEPS Policy Insights, 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  42. VAN DER LOO, GUILLAUME; PELKMANS, JACQUES, ‘Does Wallonia’s veto of CETA spell the beginning of the end of EU trade policy?’, CEPS Commentary, 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  43. VAN DER LOO, GUILLAUME; WESSEL, RAMSES, ‘The Non-Ratification of Mixed Agreements: Legal Consequences and Solutions’, CMLR, 2017, pp.735-770 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  44. VEY, JEAN-BAPTISTE; LOVE, BRIAN, ‘French parliament to ratify trade deal CETA in 2018: minister’, Reuters, 25/10/2017, available at: https://www.reuters.c om/article/us-canada-eu-trade-france/french-parliament-to-ratify-ceta-trade-deal-in-2018-minister-idUSKBN1CU1KB?il=0 (18/04/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  45. VON DER BURCHARD, HANS, ‘EU says it is willing to scrap car tariffs in US trade deal’, Politico, 30/08/2018, available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-says-it-is-willing-to-scrap-car-tariffs-in-us-trade-deal/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&u tm_campaign=69ffb830e9 (31/08/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  46. WEISS, WOLFGANG‚ Verfassungsprobleme des Abschlusses und der vorläufigen Anwendung des CETA Freihandelsabkommens mit Kanada, 2014, Deutscher Bundestag 18. WP Ausschussdrucksache 18(9)926, available at: https://www.bundestag.de/blob/438052/9f45bd9ca1de30f51726df5d391b8702/stgn_weiss-data.pdf (18/05/2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-505
  47. CHURCHILL, ROBIN R.; KHALIQ, URFAN, The Collective Complaints System of the European Social Charter: An Effective Mechanism for Ensuring Compliance with Economic and Social Rights?, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, Issue 3, 1 June 2004, p. 417–456 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  48. DE SCHUTTER, OLIVIER, The European Pillar of Social Rights and the Role of the European Social Charter in the EU legal order, 14/11/2018, available at: https: //rm.coe.int/study-on-the-european-pillar-of-social-rights-and-the-role-of-the-esc-/1680903132 (19/08/2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  49. JIMENA QUESADA, LUIS, Social rights in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: the opening to the Turin Process, Official speech at the Nicosia conference (Turin Forum III), 24/02/2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  50. HARRIS, D.J., Collective Complaints under the European Social Charter: Encouraging Process?, in: Kaikobad, Kaiyan Homi; Bohlander, Michael (eds.), International Law and Power: Perspectives on Legal Order and Justice, 2009, pp. 3-24 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  51. PALMISANO, GIUSEPPE, Lecture on “Challenges and prospects of the European system for the protection of social rights: the ESC and the relationship between the Charter and EU law”, FRAME, Brussels, December 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  52. SALCEDO, CARMEN, European Social Charter litigation: setting limits to austerity measures, righting finance, 10 August 2016, available at: http://www.socialwatch. org/node/17408 (19/08/2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  53. SANGOS, PETROS, Synergies between the European Union and the European Social Charter, at the time of the European Pillar of Social Rights, Revista juridical de los Derechos sociales, Vol. 9, No. 1, February 2019, pp. 108-135 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  54. PAPADOPOULOS, NIKOLAOS A., Austerity measures in Greece and Social Rights Protection under the European Social Charter, European Labour Law Journal, Vol. 10(I), 2019, pp. 85-97 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  55. YANNAKOUROU, MATINA; TSIMPOUKIS, CHRONIS, Flexibility Without Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  56. Security and Deconstruction of Collective Bargaining: The New Paradigm of Labor Law in Greece, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2014, pp. 331-370 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-529
  57. ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, German home-schoolers appeal to top European Court, 09.04.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.adflegal.org/detailspages/ press-release-details/german-home-schoolers-appeal-to-top-european-court (02.07.19) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  58. AVENARIUS, HERRMANN, Schulpflicht vs. Homeschooling – Die neuere Rechtsprechung des BVerfG zur Integrationsaufgabe der öffentliche Schule, Neue Zeitschrift für Familienrecht, 2015, Jg. 2 (8), S. 342-346 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  59. AVERESCH, PATRICIA; BEER, JOSHUA, “Friss Tofu, Du Würstchen”, 18.02.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/was-am-s chuelerstreik-fridays-for-future-ungewoehnlich-ist-16043259.html (19.02.2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  60. CRANMER, FRANK, Homeschooling and Art. 8 ECHR: Wunderlich, 17.01.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.lawandreligionuk.com/2019/01/17/homeschooling-and-article-8-echr-wunderlich/ (14.02.2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  61. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL, General Comment No 13 – Right to Education, UN Doc E/C.12/1990/10, 8. Dezember 1999 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  62. FAZ, Christlichen Schulgegnern kann Sorgerecht entzogen werden, 10.01.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/rhein-main/schulgegner-scheitern-mit-beschwerde-gegen-deutsche-behoerden-15981660.html (14.02.2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  63. FRENZ, WALTER, Handbuch Europarecht Band 4, 1. Aufl. 2009 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  64. FROWEIN, JOCHEN ABR., Art. 2 des 1. ZP (Recht auf Bildung), in: Frowein/Peukert, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, 3. Aufl. 2009 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  65. GRABENWARTER, CHRISTOPH; PABEL, KATHARINA, Europäische Men- Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  66. schenrechtskonvention, München, 6. Aufl. 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  67. HANSCHMANN, FELIX, Artikel 2 Recht auf Bildung, in: Meyer-Ladewig, Jens; Nettesheim, Martin; von Raumer, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, 4. Aufl. 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  68. HARRIS, DAVID; O’BOYLE, MICHAEL; WARBRICK, COLIN; BUCKLEY, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  69. CARLA, Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford, 4. Aufl. 2018 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  70. LANGENFELD, CHRISTINE, Das Recht auf Bildung, in: Dörr, Oliver; Grote, Rainer; Marauhn, Thilo (Hrsg.), EMRK/GG, Konkordanzkommentar, Band II, 2. Aufl. 2013 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  71. LANGER, THOMAS, „Parallelgesellschaften“: Allgemeine Schulpflicht als Heilmittel?, Kritische Vierteljahresschrift, 2007, Jg. 89 (3), S. 277-292 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  72. LIDDY, JANE, The Case-Law of the commission as regards the right to education, in: de Salvia, Michele; Villiger, Mark (Hrsg.), The Birth of the European Human Rights Law – Liber Amicorum Carl Aage Norgaard, Baden-Baden, 1998, S. 111-116 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  73. LTO, Deutsche Homeschooler erneut vor dem EGMR, 09.04.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/egmr-grosse-kammer-homeschooler-schulgegner-heimunterricht-kinder-entziehung-heim-entschaedigung/ (09.04.2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  74. MICUS, MATTHIAS; WALTER, FRANZ, Mangelt es an “Parallelgesellschaften”?, Der Bürger im Staat 2006/4, S. 215-221 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  75. MONK, DANIEL, Wunderlich v. Germany: enforcing compulsory home-schooling, 05.02.2019, abrufbar unter: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2019/02/05/wunderlich-v-germany-enforcing-compulsory-home-schooling/ (10/04/2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  76. PETERS, ANNE; ALTWICKER, TILMANN, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, München, 2012 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  77. POSENER, ALAN, Es ist an der Zeit, die deutsche Schulpflicht zu überdenken, 10.01.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.welt.de/debatte/kommentare/article186 875348/Homeschooling-Es-ist-an-der-Zeit-die-Schulpflicht-zu-ueberdenken.html (14.02.2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  78. RAINEY, BERNADETTE; WICKS, ELIZABETH; OVEY, CLARE, Jacobs, White, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  79. and Ovey The European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford, 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  80. Sau, Ben; Kinley, David; Mowbray, Jacqueline, The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights – Commentary, Cases, and Materials, 1. Auflage 2014 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  81. Schäfer, Patrick, Individualbeschwerden, in: Karpenstein, Ulrich; Mayer, Franz C. (Hrsg.), Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, München, 2015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  82. United Nations Human Rights Council, Implementation of General Assembly Resolution 60/251 of 15 March 2006 entitled “Human Rights Council” – Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education Vernor Muñoz, UN Doc. A/HRC/ 4/29/Add. 3, 09.03.2007 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  83. Veit, Barbara, Gerichtliche Maßnahmen bei Gefährdung des Kindeswohls, in: Bamberger, Heinz-Georg; Roth, Herbert; Hau, Wolfgang; Poseck, Roman (Hrsg.), BeckOK BGB, 50. Edition, Stand: 01.05.2019 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  84. ZEIT, Schulgegner scheitern mit Beschwerde gegen Deutschland, 10.01.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/schule/2019-01/chulpflicht-homeschooling-hessen-urteil-menschengerichtshof (14.02.2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-555
  85. ARANGO, RODOLFO, Constitucionalismo social latinoamericano y derecho a la salud, in: Morales Antoniazzi, Mariela; Clérico, Laura (Hrsg.), Interamericanización del derecho a la salud, perspectivas a la luz del caso Poblete Vilches, Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, Mexiko, 2019, S. 27 – 52 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  86. BURGORGUE-LARSEN, LAURENCE, La política jurisprudencial de la Corte Interamericana en materia de derechos económicos y sociales: de la prudencia a la audacia, in: Morales Antoniazzi, Mariela; Clérico, Laura (Hrsg.), Interamericanización del derecho a la salud, perspectivas a la luz del caso Poblete Vilches, Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, Mexiko, 2019, S. 53-110 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  87. GARCÍA RAMÍREZ, SERGIO, La tutela de los derechos humanos ante la Corte Interamericana: de los derechos civiles y políticos a los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales, in: Pacheco, Gilda (Hrsg.), IV Curso Interamericano Sociedad Civil y Derechos Humanos: Derechos económicos, sociales y culturales. Un debate urgente en democracia, Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, San José, 2005, S. 301-374 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  88. KAUFMANN, FRANZ-XAVER, Die Entstehung sozialer Grundrechte und die wohlfahrtsstaatliche Entwicklung, Nordrhein-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vorträge G 287, Paderborn, 2003 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  89. KRENNERICH, MICHAEL, Soziale Menschenrechte, Zwischen Recht und Politik, Frankfurt am Main, 2013 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  90. LONDOÑO LÁZARO, MARÍA C.; HURTADO, MÓNICA, Las garantías de no repetición en la práctica judicial interamericana y su potencial impacto en la creación del derecho nacional, Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, Nr. 149, 2017, S. 727-775 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  91. NOLTE, DETLEF; HORN, PHILIPP, Verfassungspopulimus und Verfassungswandel in Lateinamerika, GIGA Focus Lateinamerika, Hamburg, Global Institute of Global and Area Studies, 2009, Nr. 2 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  92. PERRA VERA, OSCAR, Justiciabilidad de los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales ante el Sistema Interamericano, Mexiko-Stadt, 2011 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  93. ROMAN, DIANE, Droits des pauvres, pauvres droits? Recherches sur la justiciabilité des droits sociaux, Nanterre, CREDOF – Université Paris Ouest Nanterre, 2009, S. 9 ff. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  94. SÀNCHEZ, LUCAS, Der IAGMR und WSK-Rechte, Völkerrechtsblog, 2018, abrufbar unter: https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/der-iagmr-und-wsk-rechte/ (02/10/2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  95. SCHILLING-VACAFLOR, ALMUT, Recht als umkämpftes Terrain. Die neue Verfassung und indigene Völker in Bolivien, Baden-Baden, 2010 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  96. SCHNEIDER, JAKOB, Die Justiziabilität wirtschaftlicher, sozialer und kultureller Menschenrechte, Studie / Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte, Berlin, 2004, abrufbar unter: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-316796 (02/10/2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  97. VAN HOOF, G. J. H., The Legal Nature of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Rebuttal of Some Traditional Views, in: Alston, Philip; Tomasevski, Katarina (Hrsg.), The Right to Food, Dordrecht, 1984, S. 97-110 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  98. VILLARREAL, PEDRO A., El derecho a la salud en lo individual y en lo colectivo: la calidad en los servicios de salud a partir de Poblete Vilches vs. Chile, in: Morales Antoniazzi, Mariela; Clérico, Laura (Hrsg.), Interamericanización del derecho a la salud, perspectivas a la luz del caso Poblete Vilches, Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Querétaro, Mexiko, 2019, S. 279-314 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-573
  99. BECKER, PETER, Neue Erkenntnisse zur Drohnenkriegführung, DVBl 2018, pp. 619-628 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  100. BEINLICH, LEANDER, Germany and its Involvement in the US Drone Programme before German Administrative Courts, EJIL: Talk!, 8 April 2019, available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/germany-and-its-involvement-in-the-us-drone-programme-before-german-administrative-courts/ (02/10/19) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  101. BOTHE, MICHAEL, Wegschauen verletzt das Recht auf Leben: Zum Drohnenurteil des OVG Münster, Verfassungsblog, 21 March 2019, available at: https://verfassu ngsblog.de/wegschauen-verletzt-das-recht-auf-leben-zum-drohnenurteil-des-ovg-muen (02/10/19) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  102. DOLGOWSKI, KAROLINE, Can German court stop “Hellfire” from Ramstein?, Völkerrechtsblog, 15 May 2019, available at: https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/can-ge rman-courts-stop-hellfire-from-ramstein/ (02/10/19) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  103. GERVASONI, LUCA, Overflying Justiciability? Drones and Avoidance Doctrines Before National Courts, in: Carpanelli, Elena; Lazzerini, Nicole (eds.), Use and Misuse of New Technologies, Cham, 2019, pp. 327 – 351 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  104. GOODMAN, RYAN, Why the Laws of War Apply to Drone Strikes Outside ‘Areas of Active Hostilities’ (A Memo to the Human Rights Community), Just Security, 4 October 2017, available at: https://www.justsecurity.org/45613/laws-war-apply-drone-strikes-areas-active-hostilities-a-memo-human-rights-community/ (02/10/19) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  105. GREENWOOD, CHRISTOPHER, Self-Defence, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online edition), 2011 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  106. HENCKAERTS, JEAN-MARIE; DOSWALD-BECK, LOUISE (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law, 2 volumes, 2005 (Vol. I reprinted with corrections in 2009), available at: https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/p ublication/pcustom.htm (02/10/2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  107. HEYNS, CHRISTOF; AKANDE, DAPO; HILL-CAWTHORNE, LAWRENCE; CHENGETA, THOMPSON, The International Law Framework Regulating the Use of Armed Drones, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 2016, Vol. 65, pp. 791-827 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  108. ISENSEE, JOSEF, Das Grundrecht als Abwehrrecht und als staatliche Schutzpflicht, in: Isensee, Josef; Kirchhof, Paul (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, vol. IX, Heidelberg, 3rd ed. 2011, pp. 413-568 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  109. MELZER, NILS, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law, 2009, available at: https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/icrc-002-0990.pdf (02/10/2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  110. MILANOVIC, MARKO, On Whether IHL Applies to Drone Strikes Outside ‘Areas of Active Hostilities’: A Response to Ryan Goodman, EJIL: Talk!, 5 October 2017, available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/on-whether-ihl-applies-to-drone-strikes-outside-areas-of-active-hostilities-a-response-to-ryan-goodman/ (02/10/19) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  111. MILES, EDWIN A., After John Marshall’s Decision: Worcester v. Georgia and the Nullification Crisis, Journal of Southern History, 1973, Vol. 39, pp. 519-544 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  112. NOWAK, MANFRED (ed.), CCPR Commentary 2nd Revised Edition: U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, second edition, 2005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  113. O’CONNELL, MARY ELLEN, Restricting Exceptions for Invitation and Rebellion, in: O’Connell, Marry Ellen (ed.), The Art of Law in the International Community, Cambridge, 2019, pp. 206-234 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  114. SAUER, HEIKO, Angst vor der eigenen Courage? Licht und Schatten im Drohnenurteil des OVG Münster, Verfassungsblog 22 March 2019, available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/angst-vor-der-eigenen-courage-licht-und-schatten-im-drohnenu rteil-des-ovg-muenster/ (02/10/19) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601
  115. SJÖSTEDT, BRITTA, Applying the Unable/Unwilling State Doctrine – Can a State be Unable to Take Action?, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 2017, Vol. 77, pp. 39-43 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2019-4-601

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media