Between the Sultan and the Boyars: Gifts in the Power Dynamic of Phanariot Investiture in Wallachia and Moldavia

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: DIYÂR Volume 3 (2022), Issue 2
Full access

DIYÂR

Volume 3 (2022), Issue 2


Authors:
Publisher
Ergon, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2022
ISSN-Online
2942-3155
ISSN-Print
2625-9842

Chapter information


Full access

Volume 3 (2022), Issue 2

Between the Sultan and the Boyars: Gifts in the Power Dynamic of Phanariot Investiture in Wallachia and Moldavia


Authors:
ISSN-Print
2625-9842
ISSN-Online
2942-3155


Preview:

This paper addresses the ritualized power-balancing act illustrated by investiture ceremonies of what in Romanian historiography are designated as Phanariot princes or hospodars. The discussion focuses on the specific gifts exchanged in the highly ritualized transfer of power from the sultan to the Phanariot throne contender in the Danubian Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia in the 18th and 19th century. What are the symbols and meanings assigned to these gifts? What does sharing food at the sultan’s table and replicating the custom in Wallachia and Moldavia represent in terms of the Ottoman system and the local power dynamic? What do the textiles used in the ceremonial investiture signify in terms of regulating the relation between the sultan and the throne contender? The use of specific markers for each stage has an anthropological value; however, the emphasis on material culture in a symbolical setting would make it more suitable for a cultural history methodology. Given the recent contribution of Romanian scholars on the topic of the mobility of material culture, especially in the confirmation of post-1821 rulers of Moldavia, the paper also engages with how the historiographical discourse has constructed the interval between 1711/1716 and 1821 as a particular historical period.

Bibliography


  1. Atasoy, Nurhan; Mackie, Louise W.; Tezcan, Hülya et al. 2001. Ipek, Imperial Ottoman Silks and Velvets. London: Teb Yayinlari. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  2. Alpaslan Arça, Sibel. 2008. ‘Macht und Herrschaft am osmanischen Hof: Gewandung bei Trauerfeiern, Thronbesteigungen sowie die Verleihung von Ehrenroben / Power and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Palace: Clothing at Funerals, Accession Ceremonies and the Bestowing of Robes of Honor (Hil’ats)’. In Erduman- Çalış, Deniz (ed.). Tulpen, Kaftane und Levni. Höfische Mode und Kostümalben der Osmanen aus dem Topkapi Palast Istanbul / Tulips caftans and Levni. Imperial Ottoman costumes and miniature albums from Topkapi Palace in Istanbul. Frankfurt: Museum für Angewandte Kunst Frankfurt, 40–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  3. Bouchard, Jacques. 2014. ‘Perception des Phanariotes avant et après Zallony’. Cahiers balkaniques 42. 1–17. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ceb/4935 (07 Juillet 2021). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  4. Brookes, Douglas S. 1992. ‘Of Swords and Tombs: Symbolism in the Ottoman Accession Ritual’. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 17.2. 1–22. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stab le/43384431 (24 May 2021). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  5. Bucur, Bogdan. 2008. Devălmășia valahă (1716–1828): o istorie anarhică a spațiului românesc. București: Editura Paralela 45. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  6. Burke, Peter. 2001. Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence. London: Reaktion Books Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  7. Cantemir, Dimitrie. 2007. Descrierea stării de odinioară și de astăzi a Moldovei. București: Editura Institutului Cultural Român. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  8. Coman, Roxana. 2021. ‘Ottoman Residential Architecture of the 18th and 19th centuries and the Romanian Provinces. From Cosmopolitanism to Nationalism’. Revue des Études Sud-Est Européenes. 59. 217–243. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  9. Duindam, Jerouen. 2019. ‘Crossing Boundaries: Diplomacy and the Global Dimension, 1700–1850’. The International History Review 41.5. 1092–1099. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  10. Ene, Maria-Camelia. 2016. Modă în Țara Românească, secolul al XVIII-lea și prima jumătate a secolului al XIX-lea. Veşminte şi accesorii de epocă din patrimoniul Muzeului Municipiului Bucureşti. București: Editura MMB. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  11. Erimtan, Can. 2008. Ottomans looking West? The origins of the Tulip Age and its development in Modern Turkey. Library of Ottoman Studies, London: Tauris Academic Studies. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  12. Faroqhi, Suraiya. 2011. ‘Bringing Gifts and Receiving Them: The Ottoman Sultan and his Guests at the Festival of 1720’. In Schmidt‐Haberkamp, Barbara (ed.). Europa und die Türkei im 18. Jahrhundert / Europe and Turkey in the 18th Century. Bonn: VR unipress, 383–402. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  13. Felek, Özgen and İşkorkutan, Sinem Erdoğan. 2019. ‘Introduction: Ceremonies, Festivals, and Rituals in the Ottoman World’. Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association. 6.1. 9–19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  14. Gheorghiță, Nicolae.2015. Musical crossroads: Church chants and Brass Bands at the Gates of the Orient. Bucharest: Editura Muzicală. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  15. Iorga, Nicolae. 1906 Scrisori de boieri şi negustori olteni şi munteni către casa de negoţ sibiiană Hagi Pop, publicate cu note genealogice asupra mai multor familii. Bucharest: n.p. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  16. Ilıcak, H. Şükrü. 2021. “Those Infidel Greeks” The Greek War of Independence through Ottoman Archival Documents. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  17. Janos, Damien. 2006. ‘Panaiotis Nicousios and Alexander Mavrocordatos: the Rise of the Phanariots and the Office of Grand Dragoman in the Ottoman Administration in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century’. Archivum Ottomanicum 23. 177–197. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  18. Karadja, Constantin, 1927. ‘Despre investitura domnilor români’. Buletinul Comisiunii Monumentelor Istorice. 20. 2. 57–59. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  19. Kármán, Gábor. 2013. ‘The Networks of a Wallachian pretender in Constantinople: the contacts of the future hospodar Mihail Radu 1654–1657’. In Kármán, Gábor and Păun, Radu G. (eds.). Europe and the ‘Otoman World’. Exchanges and conflicts (sixteenth to seventeenth centuries). Istanbul: The Isis Press. 119–139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  20. Lambton, Ann. 1994. ‘“Pīshkash”: Present or Tribute?’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 57.1. 145–158. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  21. Leezenberg, Michiel. 2012. ‘The oriental origins of orientalism: the case of Dimitrie Cantemir’. In Bod, Rens; Maat, Jaap and Weststeijn, Thijs (eds.). The making of the humanities: volume II: from early modern to modern disciplines. Amsterdam University Press. 243–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  22. Murgescu, Bogdan. 2012. Țările Române între Imperiul Otoman și Europa Creștină. Iași: Editura Polirom. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  23. Murphey, Rhoads. 2008. Exploring Ottoman Sovereignty: Tradition, Image and Practice in the Ottoman Imperial Household, 1400–1800. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  24. Papachristou, Panayiotis.1992. Three faces of the Phanariots: An inquiry into the Role and Motivations of the Greek Nobility under Ottoman Rule, 1683–1821. MA Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Canada. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  25. Păun, Radu G. 1997. ‘Sur l’investiture des derniers princes phanariotes. Autour d’un document ignore’. Revue d’Études Stud-Est Européennes 25.1–2. 63–75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  26. Păun, Radu G. 2007. ‘Scenă și simbol: reprezentații ale puterii în Vechiul Regim Românesc’. In Vintilă-Ghițulescu, Constanta and Willcocks, Maria Pakucs (eds.). Spectacolul public între tradiție și modernitate. București: Editura ICR. 79–122. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  27. Pedani, Maria Pia. 2007. ‘Sultans and voivodas in the 16th c. gifts and insignia’. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 1.1. 193–209. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  28. Petroviciu, Irina; Wouters, Jan; Berghe, Ina Vanden et al. 2017. ‘Dyes in some textiles from the Romanian Medieval Art Gallery’. In Atkinson, Jo Kirby (ed.). The Diversity Of Dyes In History And Archaeology. Archetype Publications. 18–29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  29. Phillips, Amanda. 2015 ‘Ottoman Hil’at: Between Commodity and Charisma’. In Hadjianastasis, Marios (ed.). Frontiers of the Ottoman Imagination: Studies in Honour of Rhoads Murphey. Leiden: Brill. 111–139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  30. Philliou, Christine. 2009. ‘Communities on the Verge: Unraveling the Phanariot Ascendancy in Ottoman Governance’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 51.1. 151–181. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  31. Philliou, Christine. 2011. Biography of an Empire. Governing Ottomans in an Age of Revolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  32. Plemmenos, John. 2013. ‘Music as a marker of liminality in 18th century Balkans. Re-Evaluating Phanariot Musical Activity in the Romanian Principalities’. In eds. Gheorghiță, Nicolae; Moisil, Costin and Suceavă, Daniel (eds.). Simpozionul internațional de muzicologie bizantină. București: Editura Universității Naționale de Muzică. 351–365. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  33. Popescu, Radu. 1847. ‘Cronica Țării Românești’. Magazin istoric pentru Dacia. 4.21–62. 93–178. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  34. Reindl‐Kiel, Hedda. 2005. ‘East is East and West is West, and Sometimes the Twain Did Meet: Diplomatic Gift Exchange in the Ottoman Empire’. In Imber, Colin et al. (eds.). Frontiers of Ottoman Studies: State, Province and the West. London et. al.: Bloomsbury. 113–123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  35. Rothman, E. Natalie. 2021. The Dragoman Renaissance. Diplomatic Interpreters and the Routes of Orientalism. Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  36. Simionescu, Dan. 1939. Literatura românească de ceremonial. Condica lui Gheorgachi, 1762. București: Fundația Regele Carol I. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  37. Simionescu, Dan. 1975. Cronica anonimă a Moldovei 1661–1729 (pseudo-amiras). Bucureșt: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  38. Siruni, Hakob. 1941. Domnii români la Poarta Otomană. După un manuscris turcesc conținând note și însemnări despre ceremoniile și recepțiunile din Palatul Împărătesc din Stambul între anii 1698–1782. București: Monitorul Oficial și Imprimeriile Statului. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  39. Sözen, Zeynep. 2019. ‘The unofficial gift in Cantemir’s History of the Ottoman Empire: forms and functions’. Cogito – Multidisciplinary research Journal 2. 39–51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  40. Tănăsoiu, Carmen. 2015. Podoabe din trecut: colecţia de paftale a Muzeului Naţional de Artă al României. Bucureşti: Editura Muzeul Național de Artă al României. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  41. Timotin, Emanuela (ed.). 2019. Elemente de ceremonial în literatura din spațiul românesc (secolele al XIV-lea- al XVIII-lea). București: Editura Academiei Române. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  42. Urechia, Vasile Alexandrescu. 1892. Istoria Româniloru. Cursu făcutu la facultatea de litere din Bucuresci. Vols. II, III, IV. Bucuresci: Lito-Tipografia Carol Gobl. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  43. Vintilă-Ghiţulescu, Constanța and Pakucs Willcocks, Maria. 2007. Spectacolul public între tradiție și modernitate. Sărbători, ceremonialuri, pelerinaje și suplicii. București: Editura ICR. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  44. Vintilă-Ghițulescu, Constanța. 2015. Patimă şi desfătare: Despre lucrurile mărunte ale vieţii cotidiene în societatea românească (1750–1860). București: Humanitas. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  45. Vintilă-Ghițulescu, Constanța et al. 2021. Lux, modă și alte bagatele politicești în Europa de Sud-Est în secolele XVI–XIX. București: Humanitas. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  46. Vintilă-Ghițulescu, Constanța. 2022. Changing Subjects, Moving Objects. Status, Mobility, and Social Transformation in Southeastern Europe, 1700–1850. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  47. Wasiucionek, Michał. 2016. ‘Conceptualizing Moldavian Ottomanness: Elite Culture and Ottomanization of the Seventeenth-Century Moldavian Boyars’. Medieval and Early Modern Studies for Central and Eastern Europe 8. 39–78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  48. Zahariuc, Petronel. 2015. ‘Bacşişuri, mătăsuri şi argintării. Călătoria boierilor moldoveni la Constantinopol în 1822. In Iacob, Dan Dumitru (ed.). Inventare de avere în secolele XVII–XIX. Iaşi: Editura Universității Iași. 311–369. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex