Between the Sultan and the Boyars: Gifts in the Power Dynamic of Phanariot Investiture in Wallachia and Moldavia

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: DIYÂR Volume 3 (2022), Issue 2
Full access

DIYÂR

Volume 3 (2022), Issue 2

Authors:
Publisher
Ergon, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2022
ISSN-Online
2942-3155
ISSN-Print
2625-9842

Chapter information

Full access

Volume 3 (2022), Issue 2

Between the Sultan and the Boyars: Gifts in the Power Dynamic of Phanariot Investiture in Wallachia and Moldavia

Authors:
ISSN-Print
2625-9842
ISSN-Online
2942-3155
Preview:

This paper addresses the ritualized power-balancing act illustrated by investiture ceremonies of what in Romanian historiography are designated as Phanariot princes or hospodars. The discussion focuses on the specific gifts exchanged in the highly ritualized transfer of power from the sultan to the Phanariot throne contender in the Danubian Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia in the 18th and 19th century. What are the symbols and meanings assigned to these gifts? What does sharing food at the sultan’s table and replicating the custom in Wallachia and Moldavia represent in terms of the Ottoman system and the local power dynamic? What do the textiles used in the ceremonial investiture signify in terms of regulating the relation between the sultan and the throne contender? The use of specific markers for each stage has an anthropological value; however, the emphasis on material culture in a symbolical setting would make it more suitable for a cultural history methodology. Given the recent contribution of Romanian scholars on the topic of the mobility of material culture, especially in the confirmation of post-1821 rulers of Moldavia, the paper also engages with how the historiographical discourse has constructed the interval between 1711/1716 and 1821 as a particular historical period.

Bibliography

  1. Published Primary Sources: Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  2. Aḳnes ve yaḫod ney çalan ḳızcıġaz, Ermeniceden Tercime Eyledi Antebli Y. S. Kürkcianoff, Üçünci Defa Tab Olundu Ḳuds şerif Ermeni Mar Yaḳub Manastırın Tabḫanesinde. 1912 (3rd edition) (= Aḳnes). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  3. Hikyayei Kör Oġlu Türküleri ile beraber Türki lisanından tercüme olunaraḳ tabh ve temsil ḳılındı, Istanbul, 1875 (= Kör Oġlu). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  4. Hekyayeyi iki ḳapu yoldaşları yaḫod haḳḳu adaletin zahiri Eserı Hovsep H. Ḳurban. Cildı sani, Asitane Nşan Berberyan, 1885 (=İki Ḳapu Yoldaşları). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  5. Aḳabi Hikyayesi. Ḳostantaniye Mühendis Oġlu Tabḫanesinde. 1851. (= Aḳabi). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  6. Aşıḳ Kerem ile Aslı Hanım Hikyayesi Türkileri ile. Türkce Lisanından Terceme Olunaraḳ Tab u Temsil Ḳılındı. Stambol, Matbaa Y. Holas (Bahçe ḳaṗu, Meydancıḳ Ḳazasker Ḫan Tiv 23). 1911 (=Aşıḳ Kerem). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  7. Leydi İzabel [İst Linn], Müellifi Misis Henri Uud, Mütercimi Doḳt. A. Naḳḳaşyan, Z. Berberyan Matbaası. 1910 (= Leydi İzabel). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  8. Mezarlıḳdan Yuvarlanan Esgi Ḳafa. Asitane. Mühendisyan Tabḫanesinde Tab Olunmuş Dur. 1870 (= Esgi Ḳafa). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  9. Yenoveva Yani Ahlaḳı Hamideyle Mevsuf Lihaza Nisa Taifesine İbretnüma Olmaya Maḫsus Hikyayeyi Nefise İkinci Defa Tab’ Olunmuş Dur Asitane Ṙ. H. Kürkcyan Tab’ḫanesinde Fincancılar Yoḳuşu N. 19. 1868 (= Yenoveva). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  10. Küçük Çocuḳların İlk Kitabı. Ya’ni oḳumaḳ öyrenmek içün eylenceli bir yol. İstanbolda, Matba’ai Hagoṗ Madteosyan. 1913 (=İlk Kitabı). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  11. Secondary Sources: Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  12. Achaṛyan, Hrach‘ya. 1912–13. ‘Friedrich von Kraelitz-Greifenhorst. Studien zum Armenisch-Türkischen. Wien, 1912 (S. W. A. W., 168)’. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris. 18. 60–61. ccxix–ccxxiv. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  13. Achaṛyan, Hrach‘ya. 1951. Hayots‘ lezvi patmut‘yun. Vol. II, Yerevan: Haypethrat. (History of the Armenian Language.) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  14. Adamović, Milan. 1985. Konjugationsgeschichte der türkischen Sprache. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  15. Aprahamyan, Garo. 2011. ‘A Note on the Bibliographic Catalogues of Armeno-Turkish Literature’. In Balta, Evangelia and Ölmez, Mehmet (eds.). Between Religion and Language: Turkish-Speaking Christians, Jews and Greek-Speaking Muslims and Catholics in the Ottoman Empire. Istanbul: Eren Yayınları. 147–152. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  16. Aprahamyan, Garo. 2014. ‘A Note on Sdepanyan’s Bibliography of Armeno-Turkish Periodicals’. In Balta, Evangelia (ed.). Cultural Encounters in the Turkish-Speaking Communities of the Late Ottoman Empire. Istanbul: The ISIS Press. 303–310. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  17. Aslanian, Sebouh, D. 2014. ‘Port Cities and Printers: Reflections on Global Armenian Print’. Book History 17. 51–93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  18. Aslanian, Sebouh, D. 2016. ‘Prepared in the Language of the Hagarites: Abbot Mkhitar’s 1727 Armeno-Turkish Grammar for Vernacular Western Armenian’. Journal for the Society of Armenian Studies 25. 54–86. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  19. Ayaydın Cebe, Günil Özlem. 2009. 19. Yüzyılda Osmanlı Toplumu ve Basılı Türkçe Edebiyat: Etkileşimler, Değişimler, Çeşitlilik. PhD Dissertation. Bilkent Üniversitesi, Ankara. http://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11693/15323/0006070.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (24 March 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  20. Ayaydın Cebe, Günil Özlem. 2013. ‘Yazmadan Basmaya, Gösterimden Romana: 19. Yüzyılda Osmanlı’da Folklor’. Millî Folklor 25.99. 27–40. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  21. Ayaydın Cebe, Günil Özlem. 2016. Cervantes’ten Tilkiyan’a Osmanlı Edebiyatında Pastoralin Sergüzeşti. Ankara: Grafiker Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  22. Bardakjian, Kevork B.. 2000. A Reference Guide to Modern Armenian Literature, 1500–1920: With an Introductory History. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  23. Berberian, Haig. 1964. ‘La Littérature Arméno-Turque’. In Bazin, Louis et al. (eds.). Philologicae Turcicae Fundamenta. Vol. 2. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. 809–819. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  24. Björkman, Walther and Burrill, Kathleen. 2012 ‘Sünbül-Zāde Wehbī’. In Bearman, P.J.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C.E and van Donzel, E. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_1122 (6 May 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  25. Cankara, Murat. 2011. İmparatorluk ve Roman: Ermeni Harfli Türkçe Romanları Osmanlı / Türk Edebiyat Tarihyazımında Konumlandırmak. PhD Dissertation. İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi, Ankara. http://www.thesis.bilkent.edu.tr/0006455.pdf (24 March 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  26. Cankara, Murat. 2014. ‘Rethinking Ottoman Cross-Cultural Encounters: Turks and the Armenian Alphabet’. Middle Eastern Studies 51.1. 1–16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  27. Cankara, Murat. 2015. ‘Çifte Maduniyet, Çifte İşlev: Ermeni Harfli Türkçe Basında Dil ve Kimlik’. İlef Dergisi 2.2. 105–130. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  28. Cankara, Murat. 2018. ‘Armeno-Turkish Writing and the Question of Hybridity’. In Babayan, Kathryn and Pifer, Michael (eds.). An Armenian Mediterranean: Words and Worlds in Motion. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 173–191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  29. Csató, Éva Á.; Brendemoen, Bernt; Johanson, Lars; Römer, Claudia and Stein, Heidi. 2016. ‘The Linguistic Landscape of Istanbul in the Seventeenth Century. Introduction’. In Csató, Éva, Á.; Menz, Astrid and Turan, Fikret (eds.). Spoken Ottoman in Mediator Texts. Turcologica 106. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 1–33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  30. Dashkevich, Yaroslav. 1994. ‘Kto oni- “Armyano kypchaki” (Ob ėtnose sozdateleĭ armyano kypchakskikh rukopiseĭ XVI-XVII vv.)’. Banber Matenadarani, 16. 58–110. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  31. Der Matossian, Bedros. 2020. ‘The Development of Armeno-Turkish (Hayatar T’rkʻerēn) in the 19th century Ottoman Empire: Marking and Crossing Ethnoreligious Boundaries’. Intellectual History of the Islamicate World. 8. 67–100. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  32. Durmuş, İsmail. 2012. ‘Transkripsiyon’. In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfi İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 41. 306–308. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  33. Garkavets, Alexander. 2017. Kypchakskoe pisʹmennoe nasledie / Qypchaq written heritage. 3 vols. Almaty: Baur. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  34. Göksel, Aslı; Kerslake, Celia. 2005. Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge: London and New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  35. Hetzer, Armin. 1987. Dačkerēn-Texte: Eine Chrestomathie aus Armenierdrucken des 19. Jahrhunderts in türkischer Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  36. Johanson, Lars. 1978–1979. ‘The indifference stage of Turkish suffix vocalism’. Türk Dili Araştırma Yıllığı – Belleten 26–27. 151–156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  37. Johanson, Lars. 1979. ‘Die westoghusische Labialharmonie’. Orientalia Suecana 27–28. 63–107. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  38. Johanson, Lars. 1986. ‘Zum Suffixvokalismus in zwei mittelosmanischen Transkriptionstexten.’ Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 76. 163–169. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  39. Koptaş, Rober. 2002. ‘Ermeni Harfleriyle Türkçe’. In Pamukciyan, Kevork. Ermeni Harfli Türkçe Metinler. Ermeni Kaynaklarından Tarihe Katkılar II. Istanbul: Aras. XI–XXIII. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  40. Karakılçık, Pınar. 2011. Hovsep H. Kurban’ın “İki Kapu Yoldaşları Yahod Hakku Adaletin Zahiri”si, 1885, İkinci Cilt, (İnceleme, Ermeni Harfli Türkçe Metin, Dizin). MA thesis. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  41. Kerslake, Celia. 1998. ‘Ottoman Turkish’. In Johanson, Lars and Csató, Éva Ágnes (eds.). The Turkic Languages. London and New York: Routledge. 179–202. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  42. Köse, Y.; Akcan, A.; Çelik, H. and Sargsyan, A. (forthcoming 2022). ‘Unfolding an Unacknowledged Written Cultural Heritage: The Armeno-Turkish Manuscripts, Printed Books and Newspapers from the Mekhitarist Congregation in Vienna (MEKHITAR)’. Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  43. von Kraelitz-Greifenhorst, Friedrich. 1912. Studien zum Armenisch-Türkischen. Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akademie der Wissenschaften, 168, III. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  44. Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  45. Littmann, Enno. 1918. Das Malerspiel. Ein Schattenspiel aus Aleppo nach einer armenisch-türkischen Handschrift. Heidelberg. Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  46. https://digi.hadw-bw.de/view/sbhadwphkl_1918_8/0051 (18 May 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  47. Meillet, Antoine. 1913. Altarmenisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  48. Menz, Astrid. 2010. ‘Klusile und Affrikaten im Anlaut armenischer Globalkopien in den Dialektmaterialen von Erzurum’. In Boeschoten, Hendrik, and Rentzsch, Julian (eds.) Turcology in Mainz. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 173–190. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  49. Mignon, Laurent. 2021. Uncoupling Language and Religion. An Exploration into the Margins of Turkish Literature. Boston: Academic Studies Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  50. Mildanoğlu, Zakarya. 2014. Ermenice Süreli Yayınlar 1794–2000. Istanbul: Aras. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  51. Pamukciyan, Kevork. 2002. Ermeni Harfli Türkçe Metinler. Ermeni Kaynaklarından Tarihe Katkılar II. Köker, Osman (prepared for publication). Istanbul: Aras. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  52. Pratt, Andrew T. 1866. ‘Miscellanies. On the Armeno-Turkish Alphabet’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 8. 374–376. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  53. Pritsak, Omeljan. 1959. ‘Das Kiptschakische’. In Bazin, Louis et al. (eds.). Philologicae Turcicae Fundamenta. Vol. 1. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. 74–87. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  54. Redhouse, Sir James. 2017. Türkçe / Osmanlıca-İngilizce Redhouse Sözlüğü / Turkish / Ottoman-English Redhouse Dictionary. Istanbul: SEV Yayıncılık Eğitim ve Ticaret A.Ş. [21st reprint of 1968] Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  55. Sakayan, Dora. 2012. Western Armenian. For the English-speaking World. A Contrastive Approach. Yerevan: Yerevan State University Press. (=Sakayan) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  56. Sanjian, Krikor and Tietze, Andreas (eds.). 1981. Eremya Chelebi Kömürjian’s Armeno-Turkish Poem “The Jewish Bride”. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  57. Schmitt, Rüdiger, Kettenhofen, Erich. ‘Hübschmann, (Johann) Heinrich’. In Encyclopaedia Iranica Online. URL: https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/hbschmann-johann-heinrich (27 October 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  58. Schütz, Edmond. 1961. ‘On the Transcription of Armeno-Kipchak’. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 12.1/3. 139–161. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  59. Schütz, Edmond. 1976. ‘Armeno-Kiptchakisch und die Krim’. Hungaro-Turcica. 185–205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  60. Słuszkiewicz, Eugeniusz. 1939. ‘Remarques sur la langue turque des Arméniens et sur les emprunts turcs de l’arménien’. Rocznik orientalistyczny 14. 136–153. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  61. Spies, Otto. 1923/1924. ‘Esman und Zejdschan. Ein türkischer Volksroman aus Kleinasien, nach einem armenisch-türkischen Druck’. Anthropos 18/19. 4/6. 804–818. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  62. Stepanyan, Hasmik. 2005. Hayataṛ turk‘eren grk‘eri ev hayataṛ turk‘eren parberakan mamuli matenagitutyun (1727–1968). Ermeni Harfli Türkçe Kitaplar ve Süreli Yayınlar Bibliyografyası 1727–1968). Istanbul: Turkuaz Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  63. Stepanyan, Hasmik. 2008. Ts‘uts‘ak hayeren dzeṛagreri hayataṛ turk‘eren nyuteri ev hayataṛ turk‘eren dzeṛagreri. Yerevan: Published by the author. (“Catalogue of Armeno-Turkish materials of Armenian manuscripts and Armeno-Turkish manuscripts”). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  64. Strauss, Johann. 2010. ‘Is Karamanli Literature Part of a “Christian-Turkish (Turco-Christian) Literature”?’. In Balta, Evangelia and Kappler, Matthias (eds.). Cries and Whispers in Karamanlidika Books. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Karamanlidika Studies (Nicosia, 11–13 September 2008). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 155–200. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  65. Tietze, Andreas (ed.). 1991. Vartan Paşa. Aḳabi Hikyayesi. İlk Türkçe Roman (1851). Istanbul: Eren. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  66. Tietze, Andreas. 2016. Tarihî ve Etimolojik Türkiye Türkçesi Lugati. Vol I. Ankara: Ses Reklam Matbaacılık. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  67. Timurtaş, Faruk. 1999. Tarihî Türkiye Türkçesi Araştırmaları III. Osmanlı Türkçesi Grameri Eski Yazı ve İmlâ - Arapça - Farsça Eski Anadolu Türkçesi. İstanbul: ALFA Basım Yayım Dağıtım. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  68. Ueno, Masayuki. 2016. ‘One Script, Two Languages: Garabed Panosian and His Armeno-Turkish Newspapers in the Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Empire’. Middle Eastern Studies 52. 4. 605–622. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  69. Woodhead, Christine. 2012. ‘Ottoman Languages’. In Woodhead, Christine (ed.). The Ottoman World. London: Routledge. 143–158. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  70. Internet resources: Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  71. https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/romanization/armenian.pdf (4 June 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  72. http://haygirk.nla.am/upload/1512-1940/1901-1940/leytiIzapel_1910.pdf (4 June 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  73. https://readcoop.eu (4 June 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  74. http://haygirk.nla.am/ (4 June 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  75. http://haygirk.nla.am/upload/1512-1940/1851-1900/kivlinea_eaxot1868.pdf (11 August 2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-161
  76. Anonymous. 1857. ‘Discours de la fuyte des impositeurs italiens et des regretz qu’ilz font de quicter la France, et de leur route vers les pays de Barbarie’. In Fournier, Édouard (ed.). Variétés historiques et littéraires, Tome VII. Paris: P. Jannet. 261–268. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  77. Anonymous. 1861. Notice historique sur les manufactures imperials de tapisseries des Gobelins et de tapis de la Savonnerie, précénte du catalogue des tapisseries qui y sont exposées. Paris: La Manufacture des Gobelins. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  78. Atasoy, Nurhan et al. 2001. İpek: The Crescent & the Rose: Imperial Ottoman Silks and Velvets. Azimuth Editions Limited on behalf of TEB İletișim ve Yayıncılıik A.Ș.: Distributed by Thames & Hudson Limited. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  79. Atasoy, Nurhan. 2002. A Garden for the Sultan: Gardens and Flowers in the Ottoman Culture. Istanbul: Aygaz. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  80. Atçıl, Abdurrahman. 2017. Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  81. Atçıl, Muhammet Zahit. 2015. State and Government in the Mid-Sixteenth Century Ottoman Empire: The Grand Vizierates of Rustem Pasha (1544-1561). PhD Dissertation. University of Chicago, Illinois. Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  82. Clerget, Pierre. 1929. ‘Les industries de la soie dans la vallée du Rhône’. Les études rhodaniennes 5.1. 1–2. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  83. Cole, Charles Woolsey. 1939. Colbert and a Century of French Mercantilism. Vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  84. Conan, Michel and Kress, Walter John. 2007. Botanical Progress, Horticultural Innovations, and Cultural Changes. Vol. 28. Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  85. Çizakça, Murat. 1980. ‘A Short History of the Bursa Silk Industry (1500–1900)’. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 23. 1–2. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  86. Denny, Walter. B.; Krody, Sumru Belger; and The Textile Museum. 2012. ‘The Sultan’s Garden: The Blossoming of Ottoman Art’ at The Textile Museum, Washington, D.C., September 21, 2012 – March 10, 2013. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  87. Erder, Leila T. and Faroqhi, Suraiya. 1980. ‘The Development of the Anatolian Urban Network during the Sixteenth Century’. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 23.3. 265–303. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  88. Evyapan, Gönül Aslanoğlu. 1999 [1972]. Old Turkish Gardens: Old Istanbul Gardens in Particular [Eski Türk Bahçeleri ve Özellikle Eski Istanbul bahçeleri]. Ankara: METU Faculty. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  89. Faroqhi, Suraiya. 1980. ‘Textile Production in Rumeli and the Arab Provinces: Geographical Distribution and Internal Trade (1560–1650)’. Osmanlı Araştırmaları. The Journal of Ottoman Studies I. 61–83. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  90. Faroqhi, Suraiya. 2009. Artisans of Empire: Crafts and Craftspeople under the Ottomans. Library of Ottoman Studies 17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  91. Ferreira, Maria João et al. 2016. ‘Les textiles à la période moderne: circulation, échanges et mondialisation’. Perspective 1. 21–32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  92. ‘Les folles années de la soie’. 1975. Exhibition. Musée historique des tissus (11 June – 30 September). Lyon: Musée historique des tissus. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  93. Gottman, Felicia. 2016. Global Trade, Smuggling, and the Making of Economic Liberalism: Asian Textiles in France 1680–1760. Europe’s Asian Centuries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  94. Heller, Henry. 2003. Anti-Italianism in Sixteenth-Century France. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  95. De L’Hiberderie, Joubert. 1765. Le dessinateur, pour les fabriques d’etoffes d’or, d’argent et de soie. Paris: Sébastien Jorry, Bauche, and Brocas. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  96. Hitzel, Frédéric. 2008. ‘Production et techniques de tissage de la soie à Bursa aux XVe et XVIe siècles’. Rives méditerranéennes 29. 11–24. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  97. Isom-Verhaaren, Christine. 2011. Allies with the Infidel: The Ottoman and French Alliance in the Sixteenth Century. Vol. 30, Library of Ottoman Studies. London: I.B. Tauris. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  98. İnalcık, Halil. 1994. ‘The Economic Mind’ and ‘The Ottoman State: Economy and Society, 1300–1600’. In İnalcık, Halil and Quataert, Donald (eds.). An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1916. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 44–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  99. İnalcık, Halil. 1999 [1985]. ‘L’Empire Ottoman’. Actes du 1er Congrès international des études balkaniques et sud-est europeénnes, III. Sofia, 1969. In Studies in Ottoman Social and Economic History. Aldershot: Ashgate Variorum. II, 75–103. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  100. İnalcık, Halil. 1999 [1985]. ‘The Hub of the City: The Bedestan of Istanbul’. International Journal of Turkish Studies I. Madison, Wisc., 1980. In Studies in Ottoman Social and Economic History. Aldershot: Ashgate Variorum. IX, 1–17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  101. İnalcık, Halil. 2011. Roome, Angela (trans.). Studies in the History of Textiles in Turkey. Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları / Türkiye Tekstil Sanayii İşverenleri Sendikası. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  102. İnalcık, Halil. 2017. The Ottoman Empire and Europe: The Ottoman Empire and its Place in European History. İstanbul: Kronik. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  103. Jolly, Anna. 2002. Seidengewebe des 18. Jahrhunderts II Naturalismus. Die Textilsammlung der Abegg-Stiftung Band 3. Riggisberg: Abegg-Stiftung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  104. Karaman, K. Kivanç and Pamuk, Şevket. 2010. ‘Ottoman State Finances in European Perspective, 1500–1914’. The Journal of Economic History 70.3. 593–629. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  105. Karaman, K. Kivanç and Pamuk, Şevket. 2013. ‘Different Paths to the Modern State in Europe: The Interaction between Warfare, Economic Structure, and Political Regime’. The American Political Science Review 107.3. 603–626. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  106. Markiewicz, Christopher. 2021. ‘Persian Secretaries in the Making of an Anti-Safavid Diplomatic Discourse’. In Sowerby, Tracey A. and Markiewicz, Christopher (eds.). Diplomatic Cultures at the Ottoman Court, c. 1500–1630. New York and Abingdon: Routledge. 27–52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  107. McCabe, Ina Baghdiantz. 2008. Orientalism in Early Modern France: Eurasian Trade, Exoticism, and the Ancien Régime. Oxford: Berg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  108. Miller, Lesley Ellis. 1995. ‘Jean Revel: Silk Designer, Fine Artist, or Entrepreneur?’ Journal of Design History 8.2. 79–96. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  109. Miller, Lesley Ellis. 2012. ‘A Portrait of the “Raphael of silk design”’. London: V&A Online Journal. 4 (Summer). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  110. Millet, Audrey. 2017. ‘Le dessinateur de fabrique (XVIIIe‑XIXe siècle): Dans l’ombre de l’atelier’. Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  111. Murphey, Rhoads. 2008. Exploring Ottoman Sovereignty: Tradition, Image, and Practice in the Ottoman Imperial Household, 1400–1800. London: Continuum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  112. Necipoğlu, Gülru. 1989. ‘Süleyman the Magnificent and the Representation of Power in the Context of Ottoman-Hapsburg-Papal Rivalry’. The Art Bulletin 71.3. 401–427. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  113. Necipoğlu, Gülru. 1990. ‘From International Timurid to Ottoman: A Change of Taste in Sixteenth-Century Ceramic Tiles’. Muqarnas 7. 136–170. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  114. Necipoğlu, Gülru. 1992. ‘A Kanun for the State, a Canon for the Arts: Conceptualizing the Classical Synthesis of Ottoman Arts and Architecture’. In Veinstein, Gilles (ed.). Soliman le Magnifique et son temps: actes du colloque de Paris. Conference Proceedings, Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais. Paris: La Documentation Française. 195–217. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  115. Necipoğlu, Gülru. 2016. ‘Early Modern Floral: The Agency of Ornament in Ottoman and Safavid Visual Cultures’. In Necipoğlu, Gülru and Payne, Alina (eds.). Histories of Ornament: From Global to Local. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 132–155. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  116. Pérez, Liliane. 2008. ‘Inventing in a World of Guilds: Silk Fabrics in Eighteenth-century Lyon’. In Epstein, Stephan R. and Prak, Maarten (eds.). Guilds, Innovation, and the European Economy, 1400–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  117. Phillips, Amanda. 2012. ‘Ottoman Silk Furnishing Fabrics in the Doris Duke Foundation for Islamic Art: Fashion and Production, 1600–1750’. Shangri La Working Papers in Islamic Art 4. 1–31. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  118. Phillips, Amanda. 2014. ‘A Material Culture: Ottoman Velvets and Their Owners, 1600–1750’. Muqarnas 31. 151–172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  119. Phillips, Amanda. 2021. Sea Change: Ottoman Textiles between the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  120. Rogers, J. Michael. 1986. ‘Ottoman Luxury Trades and Their Regulation’. In Majer, Hans Georg (ed.). Osmanistische Studien zur Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte. In memorian Vančo Boškov. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. 135–155. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  121. Rogers, J. Michael. 1992. ‘Kara Mehmed Çelebi (Kara Memi) and the role of the ser- naḳḳāşān’. In Veinstein, Gilles (ed.). Süleyman the Magnificent and his Time, Acts of the Parisian Conference Galeries Nationales de Grand Palais 7–10 March, 1990. Paris: La Documentation Française. 227–238. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  122. Schneider, Jane. 1978. ‘Peacocks and Penguins: The Political Economy of European Cloth and Colors’. American Ethnologist 5.3. 413–47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  123. de Serres, Olivier. 1600. Theatre d’agriculture mesnage des champs. Paris: Jamet Metayer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  124. T., G. [full name unknown]. 1929. ‘An Exhibition of French Textiles and Original Designs’. Bulletin of the Museum of Fine Arts 27.163. 60–63. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  125. Tongo, Gizem. 2009. ‘Interview with Professor Gülru Necipoğlu’. Interview. Tarih 1.1. 5–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  126. Uluç, Lâle. 2008. ‘The Common Timurid Heritage of the Three Capitals of Islamic Arts’. Istanbul, Isfahan, Delhi; 3 Capitals of Islamic Art: Masterpieces from the Louvre Collection. 39–53. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  127. Ünver, Süheyl. 1951. ‘Müzehhib Karamemi: His Life and Works’. Istanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  128. Ünver, Süheyl. 1971. ‘Türkiye’de Lâle Tarihi’. Ankara: Vakıflar genel müdürlüğü. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  129. Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı. 2003 [1986]. ‘Osmanlı Sarayı’nda Ehl-İ Hıref (Sanatkârlar) Defterleri’. Belgeler 11.15. 23–76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  130. Yaman, Bahattin. 2008. ‘1545 Yili Osmanlı Saray Sanatkârları’. Belleten 72.264. 501–534. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-190
  131. Atasoy, Nurhan; Mackie, Louise W.; Tezcan, Hülya et al. 2001. Ipek, Imperial Ottoman Silks and Velvets. London: Teb Yayinlari. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  132. Alpaslan Arça, Sibel. 2008. ‘Macht und Herrschaft am osmanischen Hof: Gewandung bei Trauerfeiern, Thronbesteigungen sowie die Verleihung von Ehrenroben / Power and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Palace: Clothing at Funerals, Accession Ceremonies and the Bestowing of Robes of Honor (Hil’ats)’. In Erduman- Çalış, Deniz (ed.). Tulpen, Kaftane und Levni. Höfische Mode und Kostümalben der Osmanen aus dem Topkapi Palast Istanbul / Tulips caftans and Levni. Imperial Ottoman costumes and miniature albums from Topkapi Palace in Istanbul. Frankfurt: Museum für Angewandte Kunst Frankfurt, 40–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  133. Bouchard, Jacques. 2014. ‘Perception des Phanariotes avant et après Zallony’. Cahiers balkaniques 42. 1–17. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ceb/4935 (07 Juillet 2021). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  134. Brookes, Douglas S. 1992. ‘Of Swords and Tombs: Symbolism in the Ottoman Accession Ritual’. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 17.2. 1–22. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stab le/43384431 (24 May 2021). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  135. Bucur, Bogdan. 2008. Devălmășia valahă (1716–1828): o istorie anarhică a spațiului românesc. București: Editura Paralela 45. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  136. Burke, Peter. 2001. Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence. London: Reaktion Books Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  137. Cantemir, Dimitrie. 2007. Descrierea stării de odinioară și de astăzi a Moldovei. București: Editura Institutului Cultural Român. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  138. Coman, Roxana. 2021. ‘Ottoman Residential Architecture of the 18th and 19th centuries and the Romanian Provinces. From Cosmopolitanism to Nationalism’. Revue des Études Sud-Est Européenes. 59. 217–243. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  139. Duindam, Jerouen. 2019. ‘Crossing Boundaries: Diplomacy and the Global Dimension, 1700–1850’. The International History Review 41.5. 1092–1099. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  140. Ene, Maria-Camelia. 2016. Modă în Țara Românească, secolul al XVIII-lea și prima jumătate a secolului al XIX-lea. Veşminte şi accesorii de epocă din patrimoniul Muzeului Municipiului Bucureşti. București: Editura MMB. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  141. Erimtan, Can. 2008. Ottomans looking West? The origins of the Tulip Age and its development in Modern Turkey. Library of Ottoman Studies, London: Tauris Academic Studies. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  142. Faroqhi, Suraiya. 2011. ‘Bringing Gifts and Receiving Them: The Ottoman Sultan and his Guests at the Festival of 1720’. In Schmidt‐Haberkamp, Barbara (ed.). Europa und die Türkei im 18. Jahrhundert / Europe and Turkey in the 18th Century. Bonn: VR unipress, 383–402. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  143. Felek, Özgen and İşkorkutan, Sinem Erdoğan. 2019. ‘Introduction: Ceremonies, Festivals, and Rituals in the Ottoman World’. Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association. 6.1. 9–19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  144. Gheorghiță, Nicolae.2015. Musical crossroads: Church chants and Brass Bands at the Gates of the Orient. Bucharest: Editura Muzicală. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  145. Iorga, Nicolae. 1906 Scrisori de boieri şi negustori olteni şi munteni către casa de negoţ sibiiană Hagi Pop, publicate cu note genealogice asupra mai multor familii. Bucharest: n.p. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  146. Ilıcak, H. Şükrü. 2021. “Those Infidel Greeks” The Greek War of Independence through Ottoman Archival Documents. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  147. Janos, Damien. 2006. ‘Panaiotis Nicousios and Alexander Mavrocordatos: the Rise of the Phanariots and the Office of Grand Dragoman in the Ottoman Administration in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century’. Archivum Ottomanicum 23. 177–197. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  148. Karadja, Constantin, 1927. ‘Despre investitura domnilor români’. Buletinul Comisiunii Monumentelor Istorice. 20. 2. 57–59. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  149. Kármán, Gábor. 2013. ‘The Networks of a Wallachian pretender in Constantinople: the contacts of the future hospodar Mihail Radu 1654–1657’. In Kármán, Gábor and Păun, Radu G. (eds.). Europe and the ‘Otoman World’. Exchanges and conflicts (sixteenth to seventeenth centuries). Istanbul: The Isis Press. 119–139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  150. Lambton, Ann. 1994. ‘“Pīshkash”: Present or Tribute?’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 57.1. 145–158. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  151. Leezenberg, Michiel. 2012. ‘The oriental origins of orientalism: the case of Dimitrie Cantemir’. In Bod, Rens; Maat, Jaap and Weststeijn, Thijs (eds.). The making of the humanities: volume II: from early modern to modern disciplines. Amsterdam University Press. 243–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  152. Murgescu, Bogdan. 2012. Țările Române între Imperiul Otoman și Europa Creștină. Iași: Editura Polirom. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  153. Murphey, Rhoads. 2008. Exploring Ottoman Sovereignty: Tradition, Image and Practice in the Ottoman Imperial Household, 1400–1800. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  154. Papachristou, Panayiotis.1992. Three faces of the Phanariots: An inquiry into the Role and Motivations of the Greek Nobility under Ottoman Rule, 1683–1821. MA Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Canada. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  155. Păun, Radu G. 1997. ‘Sur l’investiture des derniers princes phanariotes. Autour d’un document ignore’. Revue d’Études Stud-Est Européennes 25.1–2. 63–75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  156. Păun, Radu G. 2007. ‘Scenă și simbol: reprezentații ale puterii în Vechiul Regim Românesc’. In Vintilă-Ghițulescu, Constanta and Willcocks, Maria Pakucs (eds.). Spectacolul public între tradiție și modernitate. București: Editura ICR. 79–122. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  157. Pedani, Maria Pia. 2007. ‘Sultans and voivodas in the 16th c. gifts and insignia’. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 1.1. 193–209. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  158. Petroviciu, Irina; Wouters, Jan; Berghe, Ina Vanden et al. 2017. ‘Dyes in some textiles from the Romanian Medieval Art Gallery’. In Atkinson, Jo Kirby (ed.). The Diversity Of Dyes In History And Archaeology. Archetype Publications. 18–29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  159. Phillips, Amanda. 2015 ‘Ottoman Hil’at: Between Commodity and Charisma’. In Hadjianastasis, Marios (ed.). Frontiers of the Ottoman Imagination: Studies in Honour of Rhoads Murphey. Leiden: Brill. 111–139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  160. Philliou, Christine. 2009. ‘Communities on the Verge: Unraveling the Phanariot Ascendancy in Ottoman Governance’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 51.1. 151–181. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  161. Philliou, Christine. 2011. Biography of an Empire. Governing Ottomans in an Age of Revolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  162. Plemmenos, John. 2013. ‘Music as a marker of liminality in 18th century Balkans. Re-Evaluating Phanariot Musical Activity in the Romanian Principalities’. In eds. Gheorghiță, Nicolae; Moisil, Costin and Suceavă, Daniel (eds.). Simpozionul internațional de muzicologie bizantină. București: Editura Universității Naționale de Muzică. 351–365. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  163. Popescu, Radu. 1847. ‘Cronica Țării Românești’. Magazin istoric pentru Dacia. 4.21–62. 93–178. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  164. Reindl‐Kiel, Hedda. 2005. ‘East is East and West is West, and Sometimes the Twain Did Meet: Diplomatic Gift Exchange in the Ottoman Empire’. In Imber, Colin et al. (eds.). Frontiers of Ottoman Studies: State, Province and the West. London et. al.: Bloomsbury. 113–123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  165. Rothman, E. Natalie. 2021. The Dragoman Renaissance. Diplomatic Interpreters and the Routes of Orientalism. Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  166. Simionescu, Dan. 1939. Literatura românească de ceremonial. Condica lui Gheorgachi, 1762. București: Fundația Regele Carol I. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  167. Simionescu, Dan. 1975. Cronica anonimă a Moldovei 1661–1729 (pseudo-amiras). Bucureșt: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  168. Siruni, Hakob. 1941. Domnii români la Poarta Otomană. După un manuscris turcesc conținând note și însemnări despre ceremoniile și recepțiunile din Palatul Împărătesc din Stambul între anii 1698–1782. București: Monitorul Oficial și Imprimeriile Statului. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  169. Sözen, Zeynep. 2019. ‘The unofficial gift in Cantemir’s History of the Ottoman Empire: forms and functions’. Cogito – Multidisciplinary research Journal 2. 39–51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  170. Tănăsoiu, Carmen. 2015. Podoabe din trecut: colecţia de paftale a Muzeului Naţional de Artă al României. Bucureşti: Editura Muzeul Național de Artă al României. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  171. Timotin, Emanuela (ed.). 2019. Elemente de ceremonial în literatura din spațiul românesc (secolele al XIV-lea- al XVIII-lea). București: Editura Academiei Române. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  172. Urechia, Vasile Alexandrescu. 1892. Istoria Româniloru. Cursu făcutu la facultatea de litere din Bucuresci. Vols. II, III, IV. Bucuresci: Lito-Tipografia Carol Gobl. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  173. Vintilă-Ghiţulescu, Constanța and Pakucs Willcocks, Maria. 2007. Spectacolul public între tradiție și modernitate. Sărbători, ceremonialuri, pelerinaje și suplicii. București: Editura ICR. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  174. Vintilă-Ghițulescu, Constanța. 2015. Patimă şi desfătare: Despre lucrurile mărunte ale vieţii cotidiene în societatea românească (1750–1860). București: Humanitas. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  175. Vintilă-Ghițulescu, Constanța et al. 2021. Lux, modă și alte bagatele politicești în Europa de Sud-Est în secolele XVI–XIX. București: Humanitas. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  176. Vintilă-Ghițulescu, Constanța. 2022. Changing Subjects, Moving Objects. Status, Mobility, and Social Transformation in Southeastern Europe, 1700–1850. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  177. Wasiucionek, Michał. 2016. ‘Conceptualizing Moldavian Ottomanness: Elite Culture and Ottomanization of the Seventeenth-Century Moldavian Boyars’. Medieval and Early Modern Studies for Central and Eastern Europe 8. 39–78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  178. Zahariuc, Petronel. 2015. ‘Bacşişuri, mătăsuri şi argintării. Călătoria boierilor moldoveni la Constantinopol în 1822. In Iacob, Dan Dumitru (ed.). Inventare de avere în secolele XVII–XIX. Iaşi: Editura Universității Iași. 311–369. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-242
  179. Newspapers and journals cited Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  180. al-Ahrām, Cairo, 24/10/1923 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  181. al-Aḫbār, Cairo, 15/4/1924 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  182. al-Fatḥ, Cairo, issue 53, 14/7/1927; issue 54, 21/7/1927; issue 58, 18/8/1928 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  183. al-Manār, Cairo, vol. 16, issue 7, 1913; vol. 23, issue 9, 1922 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  184. al-Muqaṭṭam, Cairo, 27th October 1923; issues from 1895–1896 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  185. al-Muqtaṭaf, Beirut, issue 83, October 1933 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  186. aš-Šihāb, Constantine, May 1938 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  187. Secondary sources Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  188. Anonymous. 1977. Ar-Raǧul aṣ-ṣanam. Muṣṭafā Atātūrk. Ḥayāt raǧul wa-dawla. Beirut: Muʾassasat ar-Risāla. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  189. al-Aḥmad, Muḥammad ʿAlī. 2007. Suqūṭ al-ḫilāfa. Amman: Dār al-Isrāʾ. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  190. Allen, Roger. 2000. Spies, Scandals, and Sultans. Istanbul in the Twilight of the Ottoman Empire. Lanham MD & London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  191. Ardiç, Nurullah. 2012. Islam and the Politics of Secularism. The Caliphate and Middle Eastern Modernization in the Early 20th Century. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  192. Arslān, Šakīb. 1963. Amīr al-Bayān Šakīb Arslān. Ed. by Aḥmad al-Šarabāṣī. 2 vols. Cairo: Miṭbaʿat Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī bi-Miṣr. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  193. Arslān, Šakīb. 1937. As-Sayyid Rašīd Riḍā aw iḫāʾ arbaʿīn sana. Damascus: Maṭbaʿat Ibn Zaydūn. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  194. Assmann, Jan. 2000. Religion und kulturelles Gedächtnis. Munich: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  195. al-Aṯarī, al-Ġarīb al-Hāšimī al-Qurašī. 2013. al-Aqwāl aš-šanīʿa li-aʿdāʾ aš-šarīʿa. Riyadh: Dār al-Ġurabāʾ. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  196. Aydin, Cemil. 2007. The Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia. Visions of World Order in Pan-Islamic and Pan-Asian Thought. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  197. Baer, Marc David. 2010. The Dönme. Jewish Converts, Muslim Revolutionaries, and Secular Turks. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  198. al-Balʿāwī, Fatḥī Bašīr. 2008. aṣ-Ṣanam. Gaza: al-Ǧāmiʿa l-Islāmiyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  199. Barakatullah, Mohammad. 1924. The Khilafet. London: Luzac and Company Oriental and Foreign Booksellers and Publishers. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  200. Barrū, Tawfīq ʻAlī. 1960. al-ʿArab wa-t-Turk fī l-ʿahd ad-dustūrī al-ʿUṯmānī. 1908–1914. Cairo: Dār al-Hanāʾ li-ṭ-Ṭibāʿa. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  201. Bein, Amit. 2017. Kemalist Turkey and the Middle East. International Relations in the Interwar Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  202. Berg, Herbert (ed.). 2018. Routledge Handbook on Early Islam. London & New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  203. Browne, Edward. 2015. ‘Sayyid Jamāl Ud-Dīn. The Protagonist of Pan Islamism’. In Chaghatai, M. Ikram (ed.). Jamāl Al-Dīn al-Afghāni. An Apostle of Islamic Resurgence. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications. 27–57. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  204. Burke, Peter. 1991. ‘Geschichte als soziales Gedächtnis’. In Assmann, Aleida and Harth, Dietrich (eds.). Mnemosyne. Formen und Funktionen der kulturellen Erinnerung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Wissenschaft. 289–304. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  205. Cahit, Bürhan. 1932. Gazinin 4 Süvarisi. Istanbul: Kanaat Kütüphanesi. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  206. Cleveland, William. 1982. Atatürk Viewed by His Arab Contemporaries. The Opinions of Sati al-Husri and Shakib Arslan. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  207. ad-Daǧānī, Raʾfat. 1935. al-Ġāzī Muṣṭafā Kamāl wa-fursānhu l-arbaʿa 1918. Jaffa: Maṭbaʿat al-Kamāl. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  208. ad-Dāqūqī, Ibrāhīm. 2001. Sūrat al-Atrāk ladā l-ʿArab. Beirut: Markaz Dirāsāt al-Waḥda l-ʿArabiyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  209. Darwaza, Muḥammad. 1946. ʿIzzat. Turkiyā l-ḥadīṯa. Beirut: al-Kāšif. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  210. ad-Dawsarī, ʿAbd ar-Raḥmān Muḥammad. 1994. al-Yahūd wa-l-Māsūniyya. al-Ḫubar, Saudi Arabia: Dār as-Sunna. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  211. Dressler, Markus. 1999. Die civil religion der Türkei. Kemalistische und alevitische Atatürk-Rezeption im Vergleich. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  212. Enayat, Hamid. 1982. Modern Islamic Political Thought. Austin: University of Texas Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  213. Ende, Werner. 1977. Arabische Nation und Islamische Geschichte. Die Umayyaden im Urteil arabischer Autoren des 20. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Steiner Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  214. Feroz, Ahmad. 1969. The Young Turks. The Committee of Union and Progress in Turkish Politics 1908–1914. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  215. Feroz, Ahmad. 1978. ‘Ittiḥād-ı Muḥammedī Djemʿiyyeti’. Encyclopaedia of Islam. 4. Leiden: Brill. 283–284. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  216. al-Ǧamālī, Muḥammad Fāḍil. 1938. at-Tarbiya wa-t-taʿlīm fī Turkiyā l-ḥadīṯa. Baghdad: Maṭbaʿat al-Ḥukūma. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  217. al-Ǧamīl, Sayyār. 6/24/2013. ‘Asrār Tārīḫiyya ʿIrāqiyya Baʿd Miʾat ʿām ʿalā Maṣraʿ Aṣ-Ṣadr al-Aʿẓam Maḥmūd Šawkat Bāšā’. Zamān. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  218. Georgeon, François. 2003. Abdulhamid II. Le sultan calife. Paris: Fayard. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  219. al-Ǧundī, Anwar. 1986. as-Sulṭān ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd wa-l-ḫilāfa l-Islāmiyya. Beirut: Dār Ibn Zaydūn. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  220. Halbwachs, Maurice. 1950. La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  221. Halbwachs, Maurice. 1952. Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  222. Ḥallāq, Ḥassān ʿAlī. 1988. Dawr al-Yahūd wa-l-quwā d-dawliyya fī ḫalʿ as-Sulṭān ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd aṯ-Ṯānī ʿan al-ʿarš. 1908–1909. Beirut: ad-Dār al-Ǧāmiʿiyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  223. Hanioğlu, Şükrü. 2001. Preparation for a Revolution. The Young Turks, 1902–1908. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  224. Ḫānkī Bek, ʿAzīz. 1938. Turk wa-Atāturk. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa l-ʿAṣriyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  225. Ḥarb, Muḥammad. 1990. as-Sulṭān ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd aṯ-Ṯānī. Āḫir as-salāṭīn al-ʿUṯmāniyyīn al-kibār. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  226. Hartmann, Angelika. 2004. Geschichte und Erinnerung im Islam. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  227. al-Ḥasan, ʿĪsā. 2009. ad-Dawla l-ʿUṯmāniyya. ʿAwāmil al-banāʾ wa-asbāb al-inhiyār. Amman: ad-Dār al-Ahliyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  228. al-Hāšimī, ʿAbd al-Munʿim. 2004. al-Ḫilāfa l-ʿUṯmāniyya. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  229. Hassan, Mona. 2018. Longing for the Lost Caliphate. A Transregional History. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  230. Hattemer, Richard. 1997. Atatürk und die türkische Reformpolitik im Spiegel der ägyptischen Presse. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  231. Hattemer, Richard. 1999. ‘Ataturk and the Reforms in Turkey as reflected in the Egyptian Press’. Journal of Islamic Studies. 11.1. 21–42. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  232. Herzog, Christoph. 2016. ‘Mevlānzāde Rıfʿat und die jüdische Weltverschwörung’. Bamberger Orientstudien. 8. 243–269. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  233. Hilāl, Riḍā. 1999. as-Sayf wa-l-hilāl. Turkiyā min Atātūrk ilā Arkabān. Cairo: Miṭbaʿat al-Manār. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  234. Ḫiḍr, Hišām. 2009. Atātūrk wa-dawrhu fī l-qaḍāʾ ʿalā l-ḫilāfa l-ʿUṯmāniyya. Giza: Maktabat an-Nāfiḏa. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  235. Ḥilmī, Muṣṭafā Muḥammad. 2004. al-Asrār al-ḫafiyya warāʾ ilġāʾ al-ḫilāfa l-ʿUṯmāniyya. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyaa. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  236. al-Ḥuṣrī, Sātiʿ. 1944. Ārāʾ wa-aḥādīṯ fī l-waṭaniyya wa-l-qawmiyya. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat ar-Risāla. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  237. al-Ḥuṣrī, Sātiʿ. 1944. Ārāʾ wa-aḥādīṯ fī t-tarbiya wa-t-taʿlīm. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat ar-Risāla. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  238. Ībiš, Yūsuf, Yūsuf Ḫūrī and ʿArīḍa, Tūmā. 2011. Zaman al-ʿurūba l-abtar. Beirut: ad-Dār at-Taqdīmiyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  239. Ibn Bādīs, Abd al-Ḥamīd. 1938. ‘al-Ḫilāfa am ǧamāʿat al-Muslimīn’. aš-Šihāb. 14.2. 61–63. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  240. Ihrig, Stefan. 2014. Atatürk in the Nazi Imagination. Cambridge: Belknap Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  241. Iqbal, Mohammad. 1930. Six Lectures on the Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. Lahore: Kapur Art Printing Works. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  242. al-Jumaily, Qassam Khalaf and Öztopark, Izzet. 1999. Irak ve Kemalizm hareketi (1919–1923). Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma merkezi. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  243. Kassir, Samir. 2004. Considérations sur le malheur arabe. Paris: Actes Sud. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  244. al-Kātib, ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd. 1993. Ḥikāyat Atātūrk wa-l-Islām. Cairo: Aḫbār al-Yawm. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  245. al-Kawākibī, ʿAbd ar-Raḥmān. 1899. Umm Al-Qurā. ʾAy Ḍabṭ Wa Mufāwaḍāt Wa Muqarrarāt Muʾtamar an-Nahḍa l-Islāmiyya. Cairo: ʿAbd ar-Raḥmān al-Kawākibī. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  246. Kawṯarānī, Waǧīh. 1996. ad-Dawla wa-l-ḫilāfa fī l-ḫiṭāb al-ʿArabī ibbān aṯ-ṯawra l-kamāliyya fī Turkiyā. Rašīd Riḍā – ʿAlī ʿAbd ar-Razzāq – ʿAbd ar-Raḥmān aš-Šahbandar. Beirut: Dār aṭ-Ṭalīʿa. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  247. Kayalı, Hasan. 1997. Arabs and Young Turks. Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  248. Khalidi, Tarif. 1997. Arabic Historical Thought in the Classical Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  249. Kieser, Hans-Lucas. 2005. Vorkämpfer der ‚Neuen Türkei’. Revolutionäre Bildungseliten am Genfersee (1870–1939). Zurich: Chronos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  250. Krämer, Gudrun. 2010. Hasan Al-Banna. London: Oneworld. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  251. Kreiser, Klaus. 2008. Atatürk. Eine Biographie. Munich: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  252. Kreiser, Klaus and Neumann, Christoph. 2003. Kleine Geschichte der Türkei. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  253. Le Goff, Jacques. 1988. Histoire et Mémoire. Paris: Gallimard. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  254. Louhichi, Soumaya. 2018. ‘The Ideological Exploitation of ʿAbd Al-Ḥamīd II in Contemporary Arab-Islamist Narrative’. Frankfurter Zeitschrift Für Islamisch-Theologische Studien. 4. 57–98. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  255. Mizrahi, Jean-David. 2003. Genèse de l’État mandataire. Service des renseignements et bandes armées en Syrie et au Liban dans les années 1920. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  256. Muḥarram, Aḥmad. n.d. Dīwān Muḥarram. as-Siyāsiyyāt min ʿām 1922 ḥattā ʿām 1945. Kuwait: Maktabat al-Falāḥ. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  257. Mūsā Ǧabalī, Niʿma. 2013. as-Sulṭān Waḥīd ad-Dīn wa-Atātūrk, Cairo: Dār al-Āfāq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  258. Müftüoğlu, Muhammad Metin, 1413 [1992]. Er-Racülus-Sanem'den (PUT ADAM) Kemal Atatürk ـ Gizli Vesikalar, Cologne : n.p. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  259. an-Naʿīmī, Aḥmad Nūrī. 1997. al-Yahūd wa-d-dawla l-ʿUṯmāniyya. Beirut: Dār al-Bašīr, 1997. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  260. Qadrī, Muḥammad ʿAlī. 1983. Muṣṭafā Kamāl. Muḥarrir Turkiyā wa-muʾassis dawlathā l-ḥadīṯa. al-Maṭbaʿa l-Waṭaniyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  261. ar-Rayyis, Munīr. 1969. al-Kitāb aḏ-ḏahabī li-ṯ-ṯawrāt al-waṭaniyya fī l-mašriq al-ʿArabī. aṯ-Ṯawra s-Sūriyya l-kubrā. Beirut: Dār aṭ-Ṭalīʿa. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  262. Riḍā, Muḥammad Rašīd. 1923. al-Ḫilāfa aw al-imāma al-ʿuẓmā. Mabāḥiṯ šarʿiyya siyāsiyya iǧtimāʿiyya iṣlāḥiyya. Cairo: Miṭbaʿat al-Manār. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  263. Riḍā, Muḥammad Rašīd. 1913. ‘Qatl Maḥmūd Šawkat Bāšā’. al-Manār. 7.16. 557. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  264. Riḍā, Muḥammad Rašīd. 1929. ‘Ṯawrat Falasṭīn. Asbābhā wa natāʾiǧhā’. al-Manār. 30. 450–468. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  265. Rifat, Mevlânzade. 1992. al-Waǧh al-ḫafiyy li-l-inqilāb at-Turkī. Trans. by Tawfīq ʻAlī Barrū. Damascus: Dār aš-Šādī li-n-Našr (Aleppo: Maṭbaʿat al-Waqt). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  266. Rothberg, Michael. 2010. ‘From Memory to Memory. From Lieux de mémoire to Noeuds de mémoire’. Yale French Studies. 118/119. 3–12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  267. Rothermund, Dietmar. 1989. ‘Der Traditionalismus als Forschungsgegenstand für Historiker und Orientalisten’. Saeculum. 40.2. 142–148. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  268. aš-Šāḏilī, Maḥmūd Ṯābit. 1989. al-Masʾala š-šarqiyya. Dirāsa waṯāʾiqiyya ʿan al-ḫilāfa l-ʿUṯmāniyya. 1699–1923. Cairo: Maktabat Wahba. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  269. Sajid, Mehdi. 2015. Muslime im Zwischenkriegseuropa und die Dekonstruktion der Faszination vom Westen: eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Šakīb ’Arslāns Artikeln in der ägyptischen Zeitschrift al-Fath ̣(1926–1935). Berlin: E B Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  270. Saʿīd, Amīn and Ṯābit, Karīm Ḫalīl. 1922. Sīrat Muṣṭafā Kamāl bāşā wa tārīḫ al-ḥaraka at-turkiyya al-waṭaniyya fī l- Anāḍūl. Cairo: n.p. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  271. Šaʿrāwī, Hudā. 2012. Muḏakkarāt. Cairo: Hindāwī Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  272. Šawqī, Aḥmad. 2009. aš-Šawqiyyāt. Beirut: al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  273. Šitā, Ibrāhīm ad-Dasūqī. 1986. al-Ḥaraka l-Islāmiyya fī Turkiyā. Cairo: az-Zahrāʾ li-l-Iʿlām al-ʿarabī. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  274. Seyhun, Ahmet. 2014. Islamist Thinkers in the Late Ottoman Empire and Early Turkish Republic. Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  275. Šimālī, Fuʾād. 1939. Turkiyā l-ḥadīṯa. Beirut: Dār al-Maktaba l-Ahliyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  276. Sinnū, Saʿīd. 1938. Turkiyā l-Kamāliyya. Beirut: Maktabat al-Aṣḥāf wa-n-Našr. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  277. Sūkāḥ, Zuhayr. 2020. ‘Ḥaql ‘dirāsāt aḏ-ḏākira’ fī l-ʿulūm al-insāniyya wa-l-iǧtimāʿiyya. Ḥuḍūr ġarbī wa quṣūr ʿArabī’. Usṭūr. 11. 33–58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  278. as-Ṣuwayṣ, Salīm. 1970. Atātūrk. Munqiḏ Turkiyā wa bānī nahḍatha l-ḥadīṯa. Amman: Maṭbaʿat Schneller. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  279. at-Tall, ʿAbd Aḷḷāh. 1971. al-Afʿā l-Yahūdiyya fī maʿāqil al-Islām. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islāmī. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  280. Tawfīq, Muḥammad Muḥammad. 1936. Muṣṭafā Kamāl Atātūrk. 1881–1938. Cairo: Dār al-Hilāl. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  281. Temimi, Abdeljelil (ed.). 1999. Le Kémalisme et les Kémalistes. Zaghouan: Fondation Temimi pour la Recherche Scientifique et l’Information. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  282. az-Zayn, Muṣṭafā. Atātūrk. 1972. Umma fī raǧul. Beirut: Dār an-Nahār. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  283. az-Zayn, Muṣṭafā. 1982. Atātūrk wa ḫulafāʾhu. Beirut: Dār al-Kalima. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  284. az-Zayn, Muṣṭafā. 1991. Ḏiʾb al-Anāḍūl. London: Riyad El-Rayyis Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  285. Zuʿayter, Akram. 2021. Min muḏakkirāt Akram Zuʿaytar. Beirut: al-Muʾassasa l-ʿArabiyya li-d-Dirāsāt wa-n-Našr. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  286. Yalcın, Hüseyin Cahit and Kocahanoğlu, Osman Selim (eds.). 2002. İttihatcı liderlerin gizli mektupları. İstanbul: Temel Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  287. ʿAbd al-Ḥakīm, Manṣūr. 2010. aṣ-Ṣanam al-Yahūdī llaḏī hawā. Muṣtafā Kamāl Atātūrk, ḏiʾb aṭ-Ṭūrāniyya l-aġbar, ṭāġiyat al-Anāḍūl. Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  288. ʿAbd al-Ḥakīm, Manṣūr. 2013. Turkiyā min al-ḫilāfa ilā l-ḥadāṯa. Min Atātūrk ilā Ardūġān. Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  289. ʿAbd al-Qādir, Muḥammad Ṣubayḥ. 1936. Atātūrk. Cairo: Manšūrāt Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyya. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  290. ʿAllūš, Fāyiza. 2015. Muṣṭafā Kamāl Atātūrk wa-mawqifhu min al-ḫilāfa l-ʿUṯmāniyya 1881–1938. Biskra: Ǧāmiʿat Muḥammad Ḫayḍar. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262
  291. ʿAzzām, ʿAbd Aḷḷāh. 1989. Al-Manāra l-Mafqūda. Peshwar: Markaz Šahīd ʿAzzām al-Iʿlāmī. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2022-2-262

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media