Is the ideal political leader still a man? Gendered conceptions of political leadership in the contemporary political elite in Western European democracies
Table of contents
Bibliographic information

Culture, Practice & Europeanization
Volume 11 (2026), Issue 1
- Authors:
- | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Copyright Year
- 2026
- ISSN-Online
- 2566-7742
- ISSN-Print
- 2566-7742
Chapter information
Volume 11 (2026), Issue 1
Is the ideal political leader still a man? Gendered conceptions of political leadership in the contemporary political elite in Western European democracies
- Authors:
- |
- ISSN-Print
- 2566-7742
- ISSN-Online
- 2566-7742
- Preview:
Political leadership has long been associated with masculine traits such as assertiveness, toughness, and task-orientation. Contemporary politics challenges and reproduces this model. The growing presence of women in leadership and crises that highlight the value of cooperation and care foster more gender-balanced understandings of leadership. Yet, the rise of radical right parties and anti-gender movements reinforces masculinized leadership ideals. Against this backdrop, this article examines how political elites currently define the relationship between gender and good leadership. We conducted interviews with 31 Members of Parliament in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, and Spain in 2023/2024, asking: “What do you think are the most important attributes of a good minister?”. Qualitative content analysis shows that many MPs in our sample favor integrative leadership styles—cooperative, inclusive, attentive, interpersonally sensitive, and oriented toward the common good. By contrast, aggregative notions of leadership appear largely limited to assertiveness, while traits such as being forceful, controlling, or individualistic are viewed as detrimental to good leadership by many respondents. These findings suggest that many Western European elites embrace leadership ideals consistent with traits ascribed to women, even in societies far from gender parity and raise questions about the reasons behind persistent inequalities in political leadership.
Bibliography
No match found. Try another term.
- Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts–how green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (2), 417–436. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Abou-Chadi, T. & Krause, W. (2020). The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: A regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science, 50 (3), 829–847. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Aldrich, A. S. & Somer-Topcu, Z. (2025). Glass ceilings, glass cliffs, and quicksands: Gendered party leadership in parliamentary systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A. & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (gen)me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28 (1), 245–260. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Annesley, C., Beckwith, K. & Franceschet, S. (2019). Cabinets, ministers, and gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Armstrong, B., Barnes, T. D., Chiba, D. & O’Brien, D. Z. (2024). Financial crises and the selection and survival of women finance ministers. American Political Science Review, 118 (3), 1305–1323. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Bäck, H., Müller, W. C., Angelova, M. & Strobl, D. (2021). Ministerial autonomy, parliamentary scrutiny and government reform output in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 55 (2), 254–286. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Bale, T. (2003). Cinderella and her ugly sisters: The mainstream and extreme right in europe's bipolarising party systems. West European Politics, 26 (3), 67–90. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Berger, J., Wagner, D. G. & Zelditch, M. J. (1985). Introduction: Expectation states theory – review and assessment. In J Berger and M Zelditch (Eds.) Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (1–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Biernat, M. & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 707–724. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Bjarnegård, E. (2015). Gender, informal institutions and political recruitment. Explaining male dominance in parliamentary representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Bjarnegård, E. (2018). Men’s political representation. Accessed 06/01/2023. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-214. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Braun, S., Stegmann, S., Hernandez Bark, A. S., Junker, N. M. & Van Dick, R. (2017). Think manager—think male, think follower—think female: Gender bias in implicit followership theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47 (7), 377–388. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Bright, J., Döring, H. & Little, C. (2015). Ministerial importance and survival in government: Tough at the top? West European Politics, 38 (3), 441–464. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Bruckmüller, S., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F. & Haslam, S. A. (2014). Beyond the glass ceiling: The glass cliff and its lessons for organizational policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8 (1), 202–232. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Burgess, D. & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, public policy, and law, 5 (3), 665. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Claveria, S. (2014). Still a ‘male business’? Explaining women’s presence in executive office. West European Politics, 37 (5), 1156–1176. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Collignon, S. & Rüdig, W. (2020). Harassment and intimidation of parliamentary candidates in the united kingdom. The Political Quarterly, 91 (2), 422–429. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Collignon, S. & Rüdig, W. (2021). Increasing the cost of female representation? The gendered effects of harassment, abuse and intimidation towards parliamentary candidates in the uk. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31 (4), 429–449. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Curtin, J., Kerby, M. & Dowding, K. (2023). Sex, gender, and promotion in executive office: Cabinet careers in the world of westminster. Governance, 36 (1), 233–254. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Davidson-Schmich, L. K., Jalalzai, F. & Och, M (2023). Crisis, Gender Role Congruency, and Perceptions of Executive Leadership. Politics & Gende,r 19: 900–907. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Dingler, S. C. & Helms, L. (2023). Parliamentary women opposition leaders: A comparative assessment across 28 oecd countries. Politics and Governance, 11 (1), 85–96. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Dingler, S. C. & Kroeber, C. (2022). Myths about women in the political executive – how gender stereotypes shape the way MPs assess the competences of ministers. Political Research Quarterly, 76 (3), 1403–1417. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14 (6), 807–834. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Eagly, A. H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 781–797. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109 (3), 573–598. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M. & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of u.S. Public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75 (3), 301–315. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Eckel, C. C. & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal, 108 (448), 726–735. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Erikson, J. & Josefsson, C. (2023). Feminine leadership ideals and masculine practices: Exploring gendered leadership conditions in the swedish parliament. Politics & Gender, 19 (4), 1061–1086. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Erikson, J. & Josefsson, C. (2024). Adverse contagion? Populist radical right parties and norms on gender balance in political institutions. Politics and Governance, 12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Escobar-Lemmon, M. & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2009). Getting to the top: Career paths of women in Latin American cabinets. Political Research Quarterly, 62 (4), 685–699. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Escobar-Lemmon, M. & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2016). Women in presidential cabinets power players or abundant tokens? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- European Institute for Gender Equality. (2025). Gender equality index 2024. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2024/compare-countries/index/map. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Foschi, M., Lai, L. & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57 (4), 326–339. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Franceschet, S., Krook, M. L. & Piscopo, J. M. (Eds.) (2012). The impact of gender quotas. Oxford: University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Franceschet, S. & Piscopo, J. M. (2013). Sustaining gendered practices? Power, parties, and elite political networks in argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 47 (1), 85–110. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Goddard, D. (2019). Entering the men's domain? Gender and portfolio allocation in european governments. European Journal of Political Research, 58 (2), 631–655. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Goddard, D. (2021). Examining the appointment of women to ministerial positions across europe: 1970–2015. Party Politics, 27 (4), 631–643. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Håkansson, S. (2020). Do women pay a higher price for power? Gender bias in political violence in sweden. The Journal of Politics, 83 (2), 515–531. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Heilman, M. E. & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (1), 81–92. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Herrick, R. & Franklin, L. D. (2019). Is it safe to keep this job? The costs of violence on the psychological health and careers of us mayors. Social Science Quarterly, 100 (6), 2047–2058. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Höhmann, D., Latteier, T. & Bailer, S. (2025). An early leak in the pipeline – online abuse as a barrier for young women’s political engagement. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 1–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Inglehart, R. & Norris, P. (2000). The developmental theory of the gender gap: Women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective. International Political Science Review, 21 (4), 441–63. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Inter-Parliamentary Union Parline. (2025). Women in national parliaments. World average. Accessed 10.1.2025. https://data.ipu.org/women-averages/?date_year=2025&date_month=01. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Jalalzai, F. (2018). Women heads of state and government. In AC Alexander, C Bolzendahl and F Jalalzai (Eds.) Measuring women’s political empowerment across the globe (257–282). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A. & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (2), 126–136. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Kroeber, C. & Dingler, S. C. (2023). Crisis and gender in legislative-executive relations. Politics & Gender, 19 (3), 908–914. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Kroeber, C. & Hüffelmann, J. (2022). It's a long way to the top: Women's ministerial career paths. Politics & Gender, 18 (3), 741–767. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Krook, M. L. (2006). Gender quotas, norms, and politics. Politics & Gender, 2 (1), 110–118. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Krook, M. L. & Mackay, F. (eds.). (2010). Gender, politics and institutions towards a feminist institutionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan: London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Krook, M. L. & O'Brien, D. Z. (2012). All the president’s men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. Journal of Politics, 74 (3), 840–855. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Mackay, F., Kenny, M. & Chappell, L. (2010). New institutionalism through a gender lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31 (5), 573–588. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Mechkova, V. & Wilson, S. L. (2021). Norms and rage: Gender and social media in the 2018 US mid-term elections. Electoral Studies, 69, 102268. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Miller, G. J. (2005). The political evolution of principal-agent theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 8 (1), 203–225. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Montaudon-Tomas, C. M., Montaudon-Tomas, I. M. & Lomas-Montaudon, Y. (2020). Autocratic, transactional, and servant leadership in japan, france, and mexico: A cross-culture theoretical analysis. In Ç Doğru (Ed.) Leadership styles, innovation, and social entrepreneurship in the era of digitalization (101–133). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Murray, R. (2010). Parties, gender quotas and candidate selection in France. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Murray, R. (2014). Quotas for men: Reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representation for all. American Political Science Review, 108 (3), 520–532. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Nichols, A. L. (2016). What Do People Desire in Their Leaders? The Effect of Leadership Experience on Desired Leadership Traits. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37 (5), 658–671. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- O'Brien, D. Z. (2015). Rising to the top: Gender, political performance, and party leadership in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (4), 1022–1039. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- O’Neill, B., Pruysers, S. & Stewart, D. K. (2019). Glass cliffs or partisan pressure? Examining gender and party leader tenures and exits. Political Studies, 69 (2), 257–277. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Ohmura, T., Bailer, S., Meiβner, P. & Selb, P. (2018). Party animals, career changers and other pathways into parliament. West European Politics, 41 (1), 169–195. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A. & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28 (2), 177–193. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Rheault, L., Rayment, E. & Musulan, A. (2019). Politicians in the line of fire: Incivility and the treatment of women on social media. Research & Politics, 6 (1), 2053168018816228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Rosenthal, C. S. (1998). When women lead: Integrative leadership in state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Rosenthal, U., Boin, R. A. & Comfort, L. K. (2001) The Changing World of Crisis and Crisis Management. Springfield:Charles C Thomas Publisher. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Rosenwasser, S. M. & Dean, N. G. (1989). Gender role and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13 (1), 77–85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E. & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (1), 165–179. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Saaka, S. S. (2025). Shuffled and shortchanged? The gender gap in cabinet shuffles in Africa. African Affairs, 124 (495), 175–203,. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Schain, M. A. (2016). The extreme-right and immigration policy-making: Measuring direct and indirect effects. In C. Mudde (Ed.), The populist radical right. London: Routledge, 476–491. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Schein, V. E. & Mueller, R. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13 (5), 439–447. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Schneider, M. C. & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40 (S1), 173–213. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91 (5), 1053–1075. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Silvia, C. & Mcguire, M. (2010). Leading public sector networks: An empirical examination of integrative leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21 (2), 264–277. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Strolovitch, D. Z. (2013). Of mancessions and hecoveries: Race, gender, and the political construction of economic crises and recoveries. Perspectives on Politics, 11 (1), 167–176. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Strolovitch, D. Z. (2021). When does a crisis begin? Race, gender, and the subprime noncrisis of the late 1990s. In J.A.C. Remes & A Horowitz (Eds.), Critical disaster studies (51–68). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37 (3), 261–290. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Taleghani, G., Salmani, D. & Taatian, A. (2010). Survey of leadership styles in different cultures. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies, 3 (3), 91–111. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Verge, T. & Claveria, S. (2016). Gendered political resources: The case of party office. Party Politics, 24 (5), 536–548. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
- Yeganeh, H. (2017). Cultural modernization and work-related values and attitudes. International Journal of Development Issues, 16 (2), 130–146. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
