Internationale Verhandlungen via Twitter?

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen Volume 28 (2021), Issue 2
Full access

ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen

Volume 28 (2021), Issue 2


Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2021
ISSN-Online
2942-1233
ISSN-Print
0946-7165

Chapter information


Full access

Volume 28 (2021), Issue 2

Internationale Verhandlungen via Twitter?


Authors:
ISSN-Print
0946-7165
ISSN-Online
2942-1233


Preview:

Bibliography


  1. Arbia, Ali 2014: Die Republik der Gelehrten 2.0, in: ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21: 1, 109-127. Arbia Ali Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  2. Aykut, Stefan C./Morena, Edouard/Foyer, Jean 2020: ‘Incantatory’ Governance: Global Climate Politics’ Performative Turn and its Wider Significance for Global Politics, in: International Politics. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  3. Bauer, Michael W./Knill, Christoph/Eckhard, Steffen (Hrsg.) 2017: International Bureaucracy. Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research (Public Sector Organizations), London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  4. Bjola, Corneliu/Holmes, Marcus (Hrsg.) 2015: Digital Diplomacy. Theory and Practice (Routledge New Diplomacy Studies), Hoboken. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  5. Bossetta, Michael 2018: The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election, in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95: 2, 471-496. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  6. Bossner, Felix/Nagel, Melanie 2020: Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations, in: Politics and Governance 8: 2, 311-325. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  7. Brand, Alexander 2012: Medien-Diskurs-Weltpolitik: Wie Massenmedien die internationale Politik beeinflussen, Bielefeld. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  8. Briggs, Paul 2020: Global Twitter Users 2020. Pandemic Boosts Previously Expected Slow Growth, in: https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-twitter-users-2020; 15.1.2021. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  9. Burson Cohn/Wolfe 2018: Twiplomacy Study 2018, in: https://twiplomacy.com/blog/ twiplomacy-study-2018/; 4.8.2021. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  10. Chen, Wenhong/Tu, Fangjing/Zheng, Pei 2017: A Transnational Networked Public Sphere of Air Pollution: Analysis of a Twitter Network of PM2.5 from the Risk Society Perspective, in: Information, Communication & Society 20: 7, 1005-1023. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  11. Climate Action Network 2021: Fossil of the Day, in: https://climatenetwork.org/resource_ type Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  12. /fossil-of-the-day/; 4.8.2021. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  13. Dimitrov, Radoslav S. 2016: The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors, in: Global Environmental Politics 16: 3, 1-11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  14. Duncombe, Constance 2017: Twitter and Transformative Diplomacy: Social Media and Iran– US Relations, in: International Affairs 93: 3, 545-562. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  15. Duncombe, Constance 2018: Twitter and the Challenges of Digital Diplomacy, in: SAIS Review of International Affairs 38: 2, 91-100. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  16. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2018: Self-Legitimation in the Face of Politicization: Why International Organizations Centralized Public Communication, in: The Review of International Organizations 13: 4, 519-546. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  17. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2020: IO Public Communication Going Digital? Understanding Social Media Adoption and Use in Times of Politicization, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Zaiotti, Ruben (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations, Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY, 21-51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  18. Eckhard, Steffen/Ege, Jörn 2016: International Bureaucracies and their Influence on Policy- Making: A Review of Empirical Evidence, in: Journal of European Public Policy 23: 7, 960-978. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  19. Enberg, Jasmine 2020: Global Instagram Users 2020. The Pandemic Propels Worldwide User Base to 1.00 Billion for the First Time, in: https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-in stagram-users-2020; 15.1.2021. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  20. Etter, Michael 2014: Broadcasting, reacting, engaging – three strategies for CSR communication in Twitter, in: Journal of Communication Management 18: 4, 322-342. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  21. Goritz, Alexandra/Kolleck, Nina/Jörgens, Helge 2019: Analyzing Twitter Data: Advantages and Challenges in the Study of UN Climate Negotiations, in: SAGE Research Methods Cases, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526472441. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  22. Goritz, Alexandra/Schuster, Johannes/Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina 2020: International Public Administrations on Twitter: A Comparison of Digital Authority in Global Climate Policy, in: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1-25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  23. Guo, Chao/Saxton, Gregory D. 2014: Tweeting Social Change. How Social Media are Changing Nonprofit Advocacy, in: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43: 1, 57-79. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  24. Hall, Nina/Schmitz, Hans P./Dedmon, Michael 2019: Transnational Advocacy and NGOs in the Digital Era: New Forms of Networked Power, in: International Studies Quarterly 64: 1, 159-167. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  25. Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina/Saerbeck, Barbara 2016: Exploring the Hidden Influence of International Treaty Secretariats. Using Social Network Analysis to Analyse the Twitter Debate on the ‘Lima Work Programme on Gender’, in: Journal of European Public Policy 23: 7, 979-998. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  26. Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina/Saerbeck, Barbara/Well, Mareike 2017: Orchestrating (Bio-)Diversity. The Secretariat of the Convention of Biological Diversity as an Attention-Seeking Bureaucracy, in: Bauer, Michael W./Knill, Christoph/Eckhard, Steffen (Hrsg.): International Bureaucracy. Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research, London, 73-95. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  27. Jungherr, Andreas 2016: Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review, in: Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13: 1, 72-91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  28. Knill, Christoph/Bauer, Michael W. 2016: Policy-Making by International Public Administrations: Concepts, Causes and Consequences, in: Journal of European Public Policy 23: 7, 949-959. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  29. Kolleck, Nina/Well, Mareike/Sperzel, Severin/Jörgens, Helge 2017: The Power of Social Networks. How the UNFCCC Secretariat Creates Momentum for Climate Education, in: Global Environmental Politics 94: 1, 106-126. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  30. Pond, Philip/Lewis, Jeff 2019: Riots and Twitter: Connective Politics, Social Media and Framing Discourses in the Digital Public Sphere, in: Information, Communication & Society 22: 2, 213-231. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  31. Schneiker, Andrea/Dau, Magnus/Joachim, Jutta/Martin, Marlen/Lange, Henriette 2019: How to Analyze Social Media? Assessing the Promise of Mixed-Methods Designs for Studying the Twitter Feeds of PMSCs, in: International Studies Perspectives 20: 2, 188-200. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  32. Schuster, Johannes/Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina 2019: The Rise of Global Policy Networks in Education: Analyzing Twitter Debates on Inclusive Education Using Social Network Analysis, in: Journal of Education Policy 36: 2, 1-21. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  33. Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C. 2018: Twitter as Data (Elements in Quantitative and Computational Methods for the Social Sciences), Cambridge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  34. Tumasjan, Andranik/Sprenger, Timm O./Sandner, Philipp G./Welpe, Isabell M. 2011: Election Forecasts with Twitter: How 140 Characters Reflect the Political Landscape, in: Social Science Computer Review 29: 4, 402-418. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  35. Twitter 2014: The 2014 #YearOnTwitter, in: https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/a/2014/the- 2014-yearontwitter.html; 25.7.2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  36. Vu, Hong T./Do, Hung V./Seo, Hyunjin/Liu, Yuchen 2020: Who Leads the Conversation on Climate Change?: A Study of a Global Network of NGOs on Twitter, in: Environmental Communication 14: 4, 450-464. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  37. Wasserman, Stanley/Faust, Katherine 2009: Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, Band 8), Cambridge u.a. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  38. Williamson, Debra A. 2020: Global Facebook Users 2020. The Pandemic Brought Back Momentum in Lagging Regions and Led to Even Higher Growth in Others, in: https://www. emarketer.com/content/global-facebook-users-2020; 15.1.2021. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex