Gerechte Praxis statt universellem Standard. Eine alternative Perspektive auf Gerechtigkeit am Beispiel des globalen Drogendiskurses

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift Volume 56 (2015), Edition 1
No access

Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft

Volume 56 (2015), Edition 1

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Publication year
2015
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
ISSN-Print
0032-3470

Chapter information

No access

Volume 56 (2015), Edition 1

Gerechte Praxis statt universellem Standard. Eine alternative Perspektive auf Gerechtigkeit am Beispiel des globalen Drogendiskurses

Buy in shop
ISSN-Print
0032-3470
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Arneson, Richard J. 2006. Justice after Rawls. In The Oxford Handbook of Political ­Theory, Hrsg. John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig und Anne Phillips, 45-64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  2. Ashley, Richard K., und R.B.J. Walker. 1990. Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly 34: 367-416. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2600576
  3. Bell, Duncan (Hrsg.). 2010. Ehics and World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  4. Bewley-Taylor, David. 2012. International Drug Control: Consensus Fractured. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057424
  5. Bonacker, Thorsten. 2002. Die Gemeinschaft der Dekonstruktion: zum normativen Gehalt liberaler Gemeinschaften. In Philosophie der Dekonstruktion. Zum Verhältnis von Normativität und Praxis, Hrsg. Andrea Kern und Christoph Menke, 264-288. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  6. Brown, Chris. 1992. International Relations Theory. New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  7. Brown, Chris. 1994. ‘Turtles All the Way Down’: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23: 213-236. DOI: 10.1177/03058298940230020901. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230020901
  8. Bulley, Dan. 2006. Negotiating ethics: Campbell, ontopology and hospitality. Review of International Studies 32: 645-663. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210506007200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506007200
  9. Burke, Anthony. 2013. Security as Ethics. In The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies, Hrsg. Peter Burgess, 90-99. London/New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, David. 1993. Politics Without Principle. Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Open Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, David. 1998a. National Deconstruction. Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. London/Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, David. 1998b. Writing Security. United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (revised edition). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, David. 1999. The Deterritorialization of Responsibility: Levinas, Derrida, and Ethics after the End of Philosophy. In Moral Spaces. Rethinking Ethics and World Politics, Hrsg. David Campbell und Michael J. Shapiro, 29-55. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, David, und Michael J. Shapiro. 1999a. Introduction. From Ethical Theory to the Ethical Relation. In dies.: Moral Spaces. Rethinking Ethics and World Politics, VII-XX. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, David, und Michael J. Shapiro (Hrsg.). 1999b. Moral Spaces. Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  16. Campbell, Elaine. 2011. The cultural politics of justice: Bakhtin, stand-up comedy and post-9/11 securitization. Theoretical Criminology 15: 159-177. DOI: 10.1177/1362480610387967. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1362480610387967
  17. Chwaszcza, Christine. 2011. Moral Responsibility and Global Justice. A Human Rights Approach. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  18. Cochran, Molly. 1995. Postmodernism, Ethics and International Political Theory. Review of International Studies 21: 237-250. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S026021050011767X
  19. Connolly, William E. 1991. Identity/Difference. Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  20. Connolly, William E. 1995. The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  21. Couzens Hoy, David. 2004. Critical Resistance. From Poststructuralism to Post-Critique. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Open Google Scholar
  22. Critchley, Simon. 1992. The Ethics of Deconstruction. Derrida and Levinas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Open Google Scholar
  23. Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2010. Parallele Universen oder Verschmelzung der Horizonte? Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 17: 279-292. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2010-2-279
  24. Der Derian, James, und Michael J. Shapiro (Hrsg.). 1989. International/Intertextual Relations. Postmodern Readings of World Politics. New York: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
  25. Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Die Schrift und die Differenz. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  26. Derrida, Jacques. 1991. Gesetzeskraft. Der „mystische Grund der Autorität“. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  27. Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Politik der Freundschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  28. Derrida, Jacques. 2003. Autoimmunity: Real and Symbolic Suicides. In Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, Hrsg. Giovanna Borradori, 85-136. Chigaco, IL.: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  29. Diez, Thomas. 1999. Die EU Lesen. Diskursive Knotenpunkte in der Britischen Europa­debatte. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Open Google Scholar
  30. Dillon, Michael. 1999. Another Justice. Political Theory 27: 155-175. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0090591799027002001
  31. Dillon, Michael. 2013. Deconstructing International Politics. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  32. Drogenbeauftragte der Bundesregierung. 2003. Aktionsplan Drogen und Sucht. http://www.drogenbeauftragte.de/fileadmin/dateien-dba/Service/Publikationen/Drogen_und_Suchtbericht_2003_Drogenbeauftragte.pdf. Zugegriffen: 08.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  33. Dryzek, John S., Bonnie Honig, und Anne Philips (Hrsg.). 2006. The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  34. Edkins, Jenny. 1999. Poststructuralism & International Relations. Bringing the Political Back in. Boulder, CO/London: Lynne Rienner. Open Google Scholar
  35. Engelkamp, Stephan, Katharina Glaab, und Judith Renner. 2012. „In der Sprechstunde“: Wie (kritische) Normenforschung ihre Stimme wiederfinden kann. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 19: 101-129. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2012-2-101
  36. European Coalition for Just and Effective Drug Policies. 1998. Für eine gerechte und ­wirksame Drogenpolitik. http://www.encod.de/info/FUR-EINE-GERECHTE-UND-WIRKSAME.html. Zugegriffen: 08.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  37. Fagan, Madeleine. 2013. Ethics and Politics after Poststructuralism: Levinas, Derrida and Nancy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748685134.003.0007
  38. Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver. 2009. Entzweiung. Die Normativität der Moderne. Baden-­Baden: Nomos Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  39. Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver. 2009. Grundfragen politischer Philosophie. Eine Untersuchung der Diskurse über das Politische. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  40. Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver. 2010. Die Normativität von Kritik. Ein Minimalmodell. Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 1: 139-154. Open Google Scholar
  41. Forst, Rainer. 2004. Moralische Autonomie und Autonomie der Moral. Zu einer Theorie der Normativität nach Kant. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 52: 179-197. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2004.52.2.179
  42. Forst, Rainer. 2007. Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-977248
  43. Forst, Rainer, und Klaus Günther. 2011. Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Zur Idee eines interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramms. In dies.: Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, 11-30. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  44. Frost, Mervyn. 1998. A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the Millenium. Review of International Studies 24: 119-132. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598001296
  45. Frost, Mervin. 2009. Global Ethics. Anarchy, Freedom and International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2009.00200.x
  46. Gallie, William B. 1956. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167-198. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
  47. George, Jim. 1994. Discourses of Global Politics. A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Open Google Scholar
  48. George, Jim. 1995. Realist ‘Ethics’, International Relations, and Postmodernism: Thinking beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 24: 195-223. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240020301
  49. Glynos, Jason, und David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  50. Goodin, Robert E. 2003. Globalizing Justice. In Taming Globalization. Frontiers of Governance, Hrsg. David Held und Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, 68-92. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  51. Gosepath, Stefan. 2009. Zum Ursprung der Normativität. In Sozialphilosophie und Kritik, Hrsg. Rainer Forst, Martin Hartmann, Rahel Jaeggi und Martin Saar, 250-268. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  52. Hahn, Henning. 2009. Globale Gerechtigkeit. Eine philosophische Einführung. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  53. Hanfparade. 2012. Hanfparade 2012 - Freiheit, Gesundheit, Gerechtigkeit! http://www.hanfparade.de/2012.html. Zugegriffen: 08.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  54. Hansen, Lene. 2006. Security as Practice. Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  55. Henkel, Knuth. 2011. Der Krieg ist außer Kontrolle. Jungle World Online. http://­jungle-world.com/artikel/2011/33/43811.html. Zugegriffen: 08.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  56. Herschinger, Eva. 2011. Constructing Global Enemies. Hegemony and Identity in Inter­national Discourses on Terrorism and Drug Prohibition. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  57. Herschinger, Eva. 2012. ‘Hell Is the Other’: Conceptualising Hegemony and Identity through Discourse Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 41: 65-90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0305829812449501
  58. Howarth, David, und Yannis Stavrakakis. 2000. Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In Discourse theory and political analysis. Identities, hegemonies and social change, Hrsg. David Howarth, Yannis Stavrakakis und Aletta J. Norval, 1-23. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  59. Hudson, Barbara. 2003. Justice in the Risk Society. London: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  60. Hurrell, Andrew. 2002. Norms and Ethics in International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, Hrsg. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse und Beth A. Simmons, 137-154. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4135/9781848608290.n7
  61. Hurrell, Andrew, und Terry MacDonald. 2013. Ethics and Norms in International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations. 2. Auflage, Hrsg. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse und Beth A. Simmons, 57-84. London: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n3
  62. International Network of People Who Use Drugs. o. D. INPUD Position Statement on Language, Identity, Inclusivity and Discrimination. Draft version 2.1. http://inpud.wordpress.com/position-papers/inpud-position-statement-on-language-identity-­inclusivity-and-discrimination/. Zugegriffen: 08.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  63. Jabri, Vivienne. 2007. War and the Transformation of Global Politics. Houndsmills: ­Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9780230626393
  64. Kearney, Richard. 2003. Strangers, Gods and Monsters. Interpreting Otherness. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  65. Laclau, Ernesto. 2000a. Foreword. In Discourse theory and political analysis. Identities, hegemonies and social change, Hrsg. David Howarth, Yannis Stavrakakis und Aletta J. Norval, x-xi. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  66. Laclau, Ernesto. 2000b. Constructing Universality. In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Hrsg. Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau und Slavoj Žižek, 281-307. London: Verso. Open Google Scholar
  67. Laclau, Ernesto. 2004. Glimpsing the Future. In Laclau. A critical reader, Hrsg. Simon Critchley und Oliver Marchart, 279-328. London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  68. Laclau, Ernesto, und Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso. Open Google Scholar
  69. Lawler, Peter. 2008. The Ethics of Postmodernism. In Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Hrsg. Christian Reus-Smit und Duncan Snidal, 378-390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.001.0001
  70. Lyon, David. 1999. Postmodernity. 2. Auflage. Buckingham: Open University Press. Open Google Scholar
  71. Menke, Christoph. 2002. Können und Glauben. Die Möglichkeit der Gerechtigkeit. In ­Philosophie der Dekonstruktion. Zum Verhältnis von Normativität und Praxis, Hrsg. Andrea Kern und Christoph Menke, 243-263. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  72. Methmann, Chris Paul. 2010. ‘Climate Protection’ as Empty Signifier: A Discourse Theoretical Perspective on Climate Mainstreaming in World Politics. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 39: 345-372. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0305829810383606
  73. Miller, David. 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235056.001.0001
  74. Mission interministérielle de la lutte contre la drogue et la toxicomanie. 1999. Plan triennal de lutte contre la drogue et de prévention des dépendances, 1999-2001: rapport officiel. Paris: La Documentation Française. Open Google Scholar
  75. Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London/New York: Verso. Open Google Scholar
  76. Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1990. Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society. International Organization 44: 479-526. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035384
  77. NAACP. 2011. NAACP Calls for End to War on Drugs. http://stopthedrugwar.org/­chronicle/2011/jul/26/naacp_calls_end_war_drugs. Zugegriffen: 08.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  78. Nonhoff, Martin. 2006. Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie. Das Projekt „Soziale Marktwirtschaft“. Bielefeld: Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14361/9783839404249
  79. Pin-Fat, Véronique. 2009. How do we begin to think about the world? In Global Politics. A New Introduction, Hrsg. Jenny Edkins und Maja Zehfuss, 22-44. London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  80. Pin-Fat, Véronique. 2010. Universality, Ethics and International Relations. A Grammatical Reading. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  81. Renner, Judith. 2013. Discourse, Normative Change and the Quest for Reconciliation in Global Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719088025.001.0001
  82. Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  83. Shapcott, Richard. 2001. Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491672.010
  84. Shapiro, Michael J. 2012. The Micropolitics of Justice: Language, Sense and Space. Law, Culture and the Humanities 8: 466-484. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1743872110387519
  85. Smith, Steve. 2004. Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11. Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, February 27, 2003, Portland. International Studies Quarterly 48: 499-515. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.t01-1-00312.x
  86. Stäheli, Urs. 1999. Die politische Theorie der Hegemonie: Ernesto Laclau und Chantal Mouffe. In Politische Theorien der Gegenwart, Hrsg. Andre Brodocz und Gary S. Schaal, 141-165. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97432-7_7
  87. Süddeutsche Zeitung Online. 2013. Papst Franziskus geißelt den Drogenhandel. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/panorama/rio-de-janeiro-papst-franziskus-geisselt-den-­drogenhandel-1.1730194. Zugegriffen: 08.01.2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2013-1-24
  88. Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  89. Transnational Institute. 2008. 10 Years. TNI Drugs & Policy Programme 1998-2008. ­Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Open Google Scholar
  90. United Nations. 1964a. Official Records of United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 (Vol. I). New York: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  91. United Nations. 1964b. Official Records of United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 (Vol. II). New York: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  92. United Nations. 1973a. Official Records of United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Protocol on Psychotropic Substances (Vol. II). New York: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  93. United Nations. 1973b. Official Records of United Nations Conference to Consider Amendments to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 (Vol. II). New York: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  94. United Nations. 1991. Official Records of United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vol. II). New York: United Nations. Open Google Scholar
  95. Vaughn-Williams, Nick. 2009. Border Politics: The Limits of Sovereign Power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Open Google Scholar
  96. Vienna NGO Committee on Narcotic Drugs. 2008. „Beyond 2008“ - Declaration and Resolutions. http://www.vngoc.org/details.php?id_cat=13&id_cnt=59. Zugegriffen: 08.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  97. Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/Outside. International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  98. Walker, R.B.J. 2006. On the Protection of Nature and the Nature of Protection. In The Politics of Protection. Sites of Insecurity and Political Agency, Hrsg. Jef Huysmans, Andrew Dobson und Raia Prokhovnik, 189-203. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  99. Walker, R.B.J. 2010. After the Globe, Before the World. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203871249
  100. Wallace, R. Jay. 2011. Konzeptionen der Normativität: Einige grundlegende philosophische Fragen. In Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Interdisziplinäre Perspek­tiven, Hrsg. Rainer Forst und Günther Klaus, 33-55. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  101. Welch, David. 1993. Justice and the Genesis of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  102. White, Stephen K. 1988. Poststructuralism and Political Reflection. Political Theory 6: 186-208. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0090591788016002002
  103. Zehfuss, Maja. 2007. Subjectivity and Vulnerability: On the War with Iraq. International Politics 44: 58-71. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800158. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800158
  104. Zehfuss, Maja. 2011. Targeting: Precision and the production of ethics. European Journal of International Relations 17: 543-566. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1354066110373559
  105. Zehfuss, Maja. 2013. Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, and Postcolonialism. In Handbook of International Relations. 2. Auflage, Hrsg. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse und Beth A. Simmons, 145-169. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n6
  106. ZIB Forum. 2010. Internationale Politische Theorie. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 17: 267-363. Open Google Scholar

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex
No access
You do not have access to this content.

Share via email

Media