Realismus als Theorie und Heuristik

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen Volume 30 (2023), Edition 1
Full access

ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen

Volume 30 (2023), Edition 1


Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright year
2023
ISSN-Online
2942-1233
ISSN-Print
0946-7165

Chapter information


Full access

Volume 30 (2023), Edition 1

Realismus als Theorie und Heuristik


Authors:
ISSN-Print
0946-7165
ISSN-Online
2942-1233


Preview:

For much of German politics and political science, the Russian attack on Ukraine on February 24, 2022, came as an unexpected shock. At the same time, the war seemed to confirm core realist messages, such as Russia's stated goal of using force to prevent Ukraine's future NATO membership. As a result, prominent commentators lamented prejudices against realism in Germany. Indeed, by international standards, realism is underrepresented in German IR research. The article argues that an ideal-typical distinction between realist theory and realist heuristics resolves wide areas of this realism controversy. In this regard, the article exemplifies that even minimalist models of realist theory can provide important explanatory contributions to core issues of Ukrainian-Russian-German security relations. The article also demonstrates to what extent atheoretical realist heuristics can lead to empirically false, only supposedly authoritative, and politically problematic assumptions about Ukrainian-Russian-German relations.

Bibliography


  1. Poast, Paul 2022: A World of Power and Fear. What Critics of Realism Get Wrong, in: Foreign Affairs, 15.6.2022, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukraine/2022-06-15/world-power-and-fear. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  2. Schweller, Randall L. 2003: The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism, in: Elman, Colin/Fendius Elman, Miriam (Hrsg.): Progress in International Relations Theory, Cambridge, 311-347. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  3. Rynning, Sten/Ringsmose, Jens 2008: Why Are Revisionist States Revisionist? Reviving Classical Realism as an Approach to Understanding International Change, in: International Politics 45: 1, 19-39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  4. ——— 2021b: Treaty Between The United States of America and the Russian Federation on Security Guarantees, in: https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790818/?lang=en. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  5. Russian Federation 2021a: Agreement on Measures to Ensure the Security of The Russian Federation and Member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization - Министерство иностранных дел Российской Федерации, in: https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790803/?lang=en. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  6. Rosato, Sebastian. 2021: Intentions in great power politics. Uncertainty and the roots of conflict, New Haven. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  7. Rivera, Sharon W./Bryan, James/Camacho-Lovell, Brisa/Fineman, Carlos/Klemmer, Nora/Raynor, Emma 2016: The Russian Elite 2016. Perspectives on Foreign and Domestic Policy. 2016 Hamilton College Levitt Poll, The Arthur Levitt Public Affairs Center Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, https://www.hamilton.edu/news/polls/2016-russian-elite, 01.07.2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  8. Risse, Thomas/ Wemheuer-Vogelaar, Wiebke 2016: IB in Deutschland. Jung, internationalisiert und eklektisch. Ergebnisse der TRIP-Umfrage 2014, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 23: 2, 144-172. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  9. Ripsman, Norrin M./Taliaferro, Jeffrey W./Lobell, Steven E. 2016: Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics, Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  10. Radchenko, Sergey 2020: ‘Nothing but Humiliation for Russia’: Moscow and NATO’s Eastern Enlargement, 1993-1995, in: Journal of Strategic Studies 43: 6-7, 1-47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  11. Putin, Wladimir W. 2007: Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy, München, 10.2.2007, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24034, 08.06.2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  12. Shifrinson, Joshua R. Itzkowitz. 2018: Rising Titans, Falling Giants. How Great Powers Exploit Power Dhifts, in: Cornell Studies in Security Affairs, Ithaca. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  13. Pifer, Steven 2017: The Eagle and the Trident. U.S.-Ukraine Relations in Turbulent Times, Washington, D.C. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  14. NBC News 2022: Images of Russian Army Struggles Show a ‚rush to Failure‘ in Ukraine, Experts Say, in: NBC News, 4.3.2022, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/-rush-failure-russian-military-started-badly-ukraine-rcna18557. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  15. ——— 2022: Relations with Ukraine, in: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_37750.htm, 29.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  16. NATO. 2008: Bucharest Summit Declaration - Issued by the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bucharest on 3 April 2008, in: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_8443.htm, 29.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  17. Narizny, Kevin. 2017: On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics. A Critique of the Newest Realism, in: International Security 42:2, 155-190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  18. Monteiro, Nuno P. 2014: Theory of Unipolar Politics, Cambridge, UK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  19. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine 2021: Cooperation with NATO, 6.8.2021, https://mfa.gov.ua/en/about-ukraine/european-integration/cooperation-nato, 29.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  20. Meibauer, Gustav/Desmaele,Linde/Onea, Tudor/Kitchen, Nicholas/Foulon, Michiel/Reichwein, Alexander/Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2021: Forum. Rethinking Neoclassical Realism at Theory’s End, in: International Studies Review 23:1, 268-295. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  21. Mearsheimer, John J./Walt, Stephen M. 2013: Leaving Theory behind. Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations, in: European Journal of International Relations 19: 3, 427-457. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  22. ——— 2022c: Playing With Fire in Ukraine. The Underappreciated Risks of Catastrophic Escalation, in: Foreign Affairs, 26.9. 2022, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/playing-fire-ukraine. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  23. ——— 2022b: The Gold Medal for Foreign Policy Goes to Germany, in: Foreign Policy (Blog), 7.2.2022, https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/07/the-gold-medal-for-foreign-policy-goes-to-germany/, 26.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  24. Zysk, Katarzyna 2018: Russia, in: Meijer, Hugo/Wyss, Marco (Hrsg.): The Handbook of European Defence Policies and Armed Forces, Oxford, 88-106. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  25. Zürn, Michael 2022: Macht Putin den (Neo-)Realismus stark?, in: Leviathan 50: 3, 395-412. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  26. Wolczuk, Roman 2003: Ukraine’s Foreign and Security Policy. 1991-2000, London. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  27. Wohlforth, William C. 2008: Realism, in: Reus-Smit, Christian/Snidal, Duncan (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford, 131-149. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  28. Wilson, Andrew 2015: The Ukrainians. Unexpected Nation, 4. Auflage, ORT HINZUFÜGEN. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  29. Westphal, Kirsten 2020: German–Russian Gas Relations in Face of the Energy Transition, in: Russian Journal of Economics 6: 4, 406-423. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  30. Washington Post 2022: Mixed Signals from Ukraine’s President and His Aides Leave West Confused about His Endgame, 18.3.2022, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/03/18/russia-ukraine-peace-negotiations/, 29.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  31. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979: Theory of International Politics, Long Grove, IL. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  32. ——— 2022d Why Do People Hate Realism So Much?, in: Foreign Policy (Blog), 13.6.2022, https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/06/13/why-do-people-hate-realism-so-much/, 18.01.2023. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  33. ——— 2022c: An International Relations Theory Guide to the War in Ukraine, in: Foreign Policy (Blog), 8.3.2022, https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/08/an-international-relations-theory-guide-to-ukraines-war/, 26.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  34. ——— 2022b: The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine Crisis, in: The National Interest, 23.6.2022, https://nationalinterest.org/feature/causes-and-consequences-ukraine-crisis-203182. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  35. Walt, Stephen M. 2022a: Liberal Illusions Caused the Ukraine Crisis, in: Foreign Policy (Blog), 19.1.2022, https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/01/19/ukraine-russia-nato-crisis-liberal-illusions/, 26.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  36. Wagenknecht, Sahra/Dagdelen, Sevim/Pellmann, Sören/Hunko, Andrej, Nastic, Zaklin/Ernst, Klaus/Leye, Christian 2022: Erklärung zur Abstimmung über den Ukraine-Antrag von SPD/CDU/CSU, Bündnis 90/DIE GRÜNEN und FDP am 27.02.2022 - Wagenknecht -, in: https://www.sahra-wagenknecht.de/de/article/3154.erklärung-zur-abstimmung-über-den-ukraine-antrag-von-spd-cdu-csu-bündnis-90-die.html, 14.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  37. Vasquez, John A. 1997: The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs. An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition, in: The American Political Science Review 91: 4, 899-912. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  38. Varwick, Johannes 2023: Taugt Die Realistische Theorieschule Zur Erklärung Des Russischen Kriegs Gegen Die Ukraine?, in: SIRIUS – Zeitschrift Für Strategische Analysen 7 (1): 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/sirius-2023-1007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  39. Treisman, Daniel 2016: Why Putin Took Crimea. The Gambler in the Kremlin, in: Foreign Affairs 95: 3, 47-54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  40. Szabo, Stephen F. 2015: Germany, Russia and the Rise of Geo-Economics, London. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  41. Statistisches Bundesamt 2022: Außenhandel. Rangfolge der Handelspartner im Außenhandel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (vorläufige Ergebnisse), in: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Wirtschaft/Aussenhandel/Tabellen/rangfolge-handelspartner.pdf;jsessionid=D2996AF7A8AFECB826B3BB1B0B6AFB85.live712?__blob=publicationFile, 07.05.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  42. Specter, Matthew 2022: The Atlantic Realists. Empire and International Political Thought Between Germany and the United States, Stanford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  43. Sil, Rudra/Katzenstein, Peter J. 2010: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions, in: Perspectives on Politics 8: 2, 411-431. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  44. ——— 2022b: Inertia and Reactiveness in Germany’s Russia Policy. From the 2021 Federal Election to the Invasion of Ukraine in 2022, in: German Politics and Society 40: 4, 135-151. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  45. Gauland, Alexander 2013: Thesenpapier Außenpolitik - Alternative für Deutschland, in: https://web.archive.org/web/20140706142931/http://www.alternativefuer.de/thesenpapier-aussenpolitik/, 18.05.2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  46. Forsberg, Tuomas 2016: From Ostpolitik to ‘Frostpolitik’? Merkel, Putin and German Foreign Policy towards Russia, in: International Affairs 92: 1, 21-42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  47. Fiammenghi, Davide/Rosato, Sebastian/Parent, Joseph M./Taliaferro, Jeffrey W./Lobell, Steven E./Ripsman, Norrin M./ Narizny, Kevin 2018: Correspondence. Neoclassical Realism and Its Critics, in International Security 43: 2, 193-203. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  48. Fearon, James D. 2018: Cooperation, Conflict, and the Costs of Anarchy, in: International Organization 72: 3, 523-559. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  49. Elman, Colin/Jensen, Michael (Hrsg.) 2014: Realism Reader. 1. Auflage,. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  50. Edinger, Harald 2022: Offensive Ideas. Structural Realism, Classical Realism and Putin’s War on Ukraine, in International Affairs 98: 6, 1873-1893. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  51. Eberle, Jakub/Handl, Vladimír 2020: Ontological Security, Civilian Power, and German Foreign Policy Toward Russia, in: Foreign Policy Analysis 16: 1, 41-58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  52. ——— 2023c: Was jeder zur Risikobereitschaft des Putin-Regimes wissen sollte, in: PRIF BLOG (Blog), https://blog.prif.org/2023/01/13/was-jeder-zur-risikobereitschaft-des-putin-regimes-wissen-sollte/, 13.1.2023. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  53. ——— 2023b: Risk Acceptance and Offensive War: The Case of Russia Under the Putin Regime, in: Contemporary Security Policy 44: 2, 199-225. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  54. ——— 2023a: The Stopping Power of Sources: Implied Causal Mechanisms and Historical Interpretations in (Mearsheimer’s) Arguments on the Russo-Ukrainian War’. Analyse & Kritik. Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory 45 (1): 137–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2023-2006. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  55. Götz, Elias 2016: Neorealism and Russia’s Ukraine Policy, 1991–Present, in: Contemporary Politics 22: 3, 301-323. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  56. ——— 2022a: Did Germany Contribute to Deterrence Failure against Russia in Early 2022?, in: Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 16: 3, 152-171. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  57. Driedger, Jonas J. 2021: Bilateral Defence and Security Cooperation Despite Disintegration. Does the Brexit Process Divide the United Kingdom and Germany on Russia?, in: European Journal of International Security 6: 1, 86-108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  58. Donnelly, Jack 2000: Realism and International Relations; Cambridge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  59. Deutschlandfunk.de 2022, Interview mit Herfried Münkler: Wie verändert der Krieg die Nachkriegsordnung?, in: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/wie-veraendert-der-krieg-die-nachkriegsordnung-herfried-muenkler-politikwissens-dlf-aa52b7e0-100.html, 28.2.2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  60. Czada, Roland 2022: Realismus im Aufwind? Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik in der »Zeitenwende«, in: Leviathan 50: 2, 216-38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  61. Colgan, Jeff D. 2016: Where Is International Relations Going? Evidence from Graduate Training, in: International Studies Quarterly 60: 3, 486-98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  62. Booth, Ken (Hrsg.) 2011: Realism and World Politics, London.  Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  63. Blinken, Antony J./Kuleba, Dmytro 2021: U.S.-Ukraine Charter on Strategic Partnership, in: United States Department of State (Blog), https://www.state.gov/u-s-ukraine-charter-on-strategic-partnership/, 10.11.2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  64. Beach, Derek/Pedersen, Rasmus Brun 2016: Causal Case Study Methods. Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching and Tracing, Ann Arbor, MI. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  65. Åtland, Kristian 2020: Destined for Deadlock? Russia, Ukraine, and the Unfulfilled Minsk Agreements, in: Post-Soviet Affairs 36: 2, 122-39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  66. Legro, Jeffrey W./Moravcsik, Andrew 1999: Is Anybody Still a Realist?, in: International Security 24: 2, 5-55. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  67. ——— 2022a: John Mearsheimer on why the West is principally responsible for the Ukrainian crisis, in: The Economist, 25.3.2022, https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2022/03/11/john-mearsheimer-on-why-the-west-is-principally-responsible-for-the-ukrainian-crisis. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  68. ——— 2014: Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault, in: Foreign Affairs, 18.8.2014, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-08-18/why-ukraine-crisis-west-s-fault, 22.09.2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  69. Mearsheimer, John J. 2001_ The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, 1. Auflage, New York. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  70. ——— 2020: Putin, Putinism, and the Domestic Determinants of Russian Foreign Policy, in: International Security 45: 2, 95-139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  71. McFaul, Michael 2002: The Liberty Doctrine. Hoover Institution. 1. April 2002, in: https://www.hoover.org/research/liberty-doctrine, 12.02.2018 . Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  72. Maull, Hanns W. 2018: Reflective, Hegemonic, Geo-economic, Civilian … ? The Puzzle of German Power, in: German Politics 27: 4, 460-478. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  73. Masala, Carlo/Mearsheimer, John J./Waltz, Kenneth N. 2014: Kenneth N. Waltz. Einführung in seine Theorie und Auseinandersetzung mit seinen Kritikern, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  74. Masala, Carlo. 2017: Realismus in den Internationalen Beziehungen, in: Sauer, Frank/Masala, Carlo (Hrsg.): Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen, Wiesbaden, 141-175. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  75. Lieber, Keir A./Press, Daryl G. 2020: The Myth of the Nuclear Revolution: Power Politics in the Atomic Age, Ithaca, NY. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  76. Lieber, Keir A. 2005: War and the Engineers: The Primacy of Politics over Technology, Cornell Studies in Security Affairs, Ithaca, NY. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  77. Allison, Roy 2014: Russian ‘Deniable’ Intervention in Ukraine: How and Why Russia Broke the Rules, in: International Affairs 90: 6, 1255-1297. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  78. Krotz, Ulrich. 2015: History and Foreign Policy in France and Germany, London. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  79. Keohane, Robert O./Nye, Joseph S. 1977: Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition. Boston. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  80. Jenne, Dominik 2017: Realität oder Ideologie? Implizite Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen in Schulbüchern Für Den Politik- und Geschichtsunterricht der Sekundarstufe. Leverkusen-Opladen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  81. Ish-Shalom, Piki 2013: Democratic Peace. A Political Biography. Ann Arbor. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  82. Hellmann, Gunther 2009: Fatal Attraction? German Foreign Policy and IR/Foreign Policy Theory, in: Journal of International Relations and Development 12: 3, 257-292. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  83. Haslam, Jonathan 2002_ No Virtue Like Necessity. Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli. New Haven, CT. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  84. Guzzini, Stefano 1998: Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  85. ——— 2021: Neoclassical Realist Theories, Intervening Variables, and Paradigmatic Boundaries, in: Foreign Policy Analysis 17: 2. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85
  86. ——— 2019: Explaining Russia’s Opposition to NATO Enlargement. Strategic Imperatives, Ideas, or Domestic Politics?, in: Hamilton, Daniel S./Spohr, Kristina (Hrsg.): Open Door: NATO and Euro-Atlantic Security after the Cold War, Washington DC, 481-498. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex