Zum Verhältnis von Journalismus und Aktivismus: Boundary work als Navigieren zwischen Komplementarität und Hybridisierung.

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Volume 14 (2025), Edition 1
Open Access Full access

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Volume 14 (2025), Edition 1

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Publication year
2025
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 14 (2025), Edition 1

Zum Verhältnis von Journalismus und Aktivismus: Boundary work als Navigieren zwischen Komplementarität und Hybridisierung.

Authors:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
Preview:

Discursive self-empowerment, the visibility of political attitudes and acting towards societal transformation are vernacular practices in social media. This also applies to parts of journalistic actors who advocate for equality and social justice alongside or within their professional activities. Results from qualitative ethnographic case studies on border crossers who are active in journalism and/or activism based on a feminist perspective are reported. The boundary work approach, implemented here in a comparative design that examines the perspectives of journalists and activists in an interrelationship, guides the analysis. In addition to discursive boundary work (normative imagery/role orientation), the actual positioning of the actors in their professional fields was also analyzed (practical actuality/role performance). A comparison of the groups shows a tendency towards opposing boundary work: While the activists discursively argue and justify complementary cooperation of independent, clearly separated fields of activity, the (feminist) journalists justify the hybridization of both fields. This hybridization is legitimized with the (new) norm of transparent, evidence-based partisanship, linked to the idea of community-oriented journalism with a high degree of personal approachability. On the level of practical performance, the activists show formal and stylistic overlaps with journalistic practices, contrary to the verbal demarcation, while the journalists (can) realize the hybridity that verbally has been made strong to varying degrees. The concept of boundary work is made fruitful for the praxeologically based analysis of ongoing negotiating of boundaries between professional journalism and other forms of public communication, which pose a particular challenge in digital media environments. The relational perspective of investigation here allows for a nuanced and dynamic consideration of boundary changes beyond dichotomous distinctions (journalism, non-journalism).

Bibliography

  1. Aigner, I., & Lenz, I. (2019). Antifeminismus und Antigenderismus in medialen und digitalen Öffentlichkeiten [Antifeminism and antigenderism in mediated and digital public spheres]. In J. Dorer, B. Geiger, B. Hipfl & V. Ratković (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medien und Geschlecht (S. 1–10). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20712-0_45-1 Open Google Scholar
  2. Altmeppen, K.-D. (2016). Anwaltschaftlicher Journalismus [Advocacy journalism]. In J. Heesen (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (S. 132–137). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_18 Open Google Scholar
  3. Ammann, I. (2010). Gedenktagsjournalismus. Bedeutung und Funktion in der Erinnerungskultur [Memorial day journalism. Meaning and function in the culture of memory]. In K. Arnold, W. Hömberg & S. Kinnebrock (Hrsg.), Geschichtsjournalismus: Zwischen Information und Inszenierung (S. 153–167). LIT Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  4. Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070 Open Google Scholar
  5. Banjac, S., & Hanusch, F. (2022). A question of perspective: Exploring audiences’ views of journalistic boundaries. New Media & Society, 24(3), 705–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444820963795 Open Google Scholar
  6. Barker-Plummer, B., & Barker-Plummer, D. (2017). Twitter as a feminist resource: #YesAllWomen, digital platforms, and discursive social change. In J. Earl & D. A. Rohlinger (Hrsg.), Social Movements and Media (S. 91–118). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020170000014010 Open Google Scholar
  7. Barnard, S. R. (2018). Tweeting #Ferguson: Mediatized fields and the new activist journalist. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2252–2271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712723 Open Google Scholar
  8. Belair-Gagnon, V., & Holton, A. E. (2018). Boundary work, interloper media, and analytics in newsrooms: An analysis of the roles of web analytics companies in news production. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1445001 Open Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 Open Google Scholar
  10. Bettendorf, S. (2019). Instagram-Journalismus: Ein Leitfaden für Redaktionen und freie Journalisten [Instagram journalism: A guideline for newsrooms and free journalists]. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25853-5 Open Google Scholar
  11. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2007). Über die Rechtfertigung. Eine Soziologie der kritischen Urteilskraft [On justification. Economies of Worth]. Hamburger Edition. Open Google Scholar
  12. boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Hrsg.), A Networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (S. 39–58). Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  13. Brinkmann, J. (2023). Journalistische Grenzgänger. Wie die Reportage-Formate von funk Wirklichkeit konstruieren. [Journalistic border crossers. How funk’s reportage formats construct reality]. Otto-Brenner-Stiftung. https://www.otto-brenner-stiftung.de/journalistische-grenzgaenger/ Open Google Scholar
  14. Brüggemann, M., Frech, J., & Schäfer, T. (2021). Transformative journalisms: How the ecological crisis is transforming journalism [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mqv5w Open Google Scholar
  15. Bruns, A. (2017). Gatewatching and news curation: Journalism, social media, and the public sphere. Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  16. Burri, R. V. (2008). Doing distinctions: Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707082021 Open Google Scholar
  17. Cabas-Mijares, A. (2023). In feminism we trust! On how feminist standpoint epistemologies shape journalism practices in two Argentine digital newsrooms. Journalism, 24(8), 1615–1633. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221090741 Open Google Scholar
  18. Carlson, M. (2015). Introduction. The many boundaries of journalism. In M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (Hrsg.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation (S. 1–18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727684 Open Google Scholar
  19. Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088 Open Google Scholar
  20. Carlson, M., & Lewis, S. C. (Hrsg.) (2015). Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation. Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  21. Carlson, M., & Lewis, S. C. (2019). Boundary work. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The handbook of journalism studies (S. 123–135). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497-8 Open Google Scholar
  22. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  23. Chan, J. M., & Lee, C.-C. (1984). The journalistic paradigm on civil protests: A case study of Hong Kong. In A. Arno & W. Dissanayake (Hrsg.), The news media in national and international conflict (S. 182–202). Westview. Open Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  25. Costera Meijer, I. (2020). Understanding the audience turn in journalism: From quality discourse to innovation discourse as anchoring practices 1995–2020. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2326–2342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1847681 Open Google Scholar
  26. Crossley, A. D. (2015). Facebook feminism: Social media, blogs, and new technologies of contemporary U.S. feminism. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-2-253 Open Google Scholar
  27. Di Salvo, P. (2020). The boundary space between journalism and activism. In P. Di Salvo, Digital whistleblowing platforms in journalism (S. 155–174). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38505-7_7 Open Google Scholar
  28. Domingo, D., & Le Cam, F. (2015). Journalism beyond the boundaries. The collective construction of news narratives. In M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (Hrsg.), Boundaries of journalism: professionalism, practices and participation (S. 137–151). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727684 Open Google Scholar
  29. Drüeke, R. (2019). Digitale Öffentlichkeiten und feministische Protestkulturen [Digital public spheres and feminist protest cultures]. In J. Dorer, B. Geiger, B. Hipfl & V. Ratković (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medien und Geschlecht. Perspektiven und Befunde der feministischen Kommunikations- und Medienforschung [Handbook media and gender. Perspectives and findings of feminist communication and media research] (S. 1–11). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20712-0_42-1 Open Google Scholar
  30. Edgerly, S., & Vraga, E. K. (2020). Deciding what’s news: News-ness as an audience concept for the hybrid media environment. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(2), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020916808 Open Google Scholar
  31. Eldridge II, S. A. (2019). Where do we draw the line? Interlopers, (ant)agonists, and an unbounded journalistic field. Media and Communication, 7(4), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i4.2295 Open Google Scholar
  32. Ferrucci, P., & Canella, G. (2023). Resisting the resistance (journalism): Ben Smith, Ronan Farrow, and delineating boundaries of practice. Journalism, 24(3), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211064379 Open Google Scholar
  33. Fotopoulou, A. (2017). Feminist activism and digital networks: Between empowerment and vulnerability. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  34. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. Open Google Scholar
  35. Ginosar, A., & Reich, Z. (2022). Obsessive-activist journalists: A new model of journalism? Journalism Practice, 16(4), 660–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1816488 Open Google Scholar
  36. Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Mellado, C., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., Coman, M., Hamada, B., Hernández, M. E., Karadjov, C. D., Moreira, S. V., Mwesige, P. G., Plaisance, P. L., Reich, Z., Seethaler, J., Skewes, E. A., Vardiansyah Noor, D., & Kee Wang Yuen, E. (2011). Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.512502 Open Google Scholar
  37. Hanitzsch, T., & Vos, T. P. (2017). Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive Constitution of Journalism. Communication Theory, 27(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12112 Open Google Scholar
  38. Hanusch, F. (2018). Political journalists’ corporate and personal identities on twitter profile pages: A comparative analysis in four Westminster democracies. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1488–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698479 Open Google Scholar
  39. Hanusch, F., & Löhmann, K. (2022). Dimensions of peripherality in journalism: A typology for studying new actors in the journalistic field. Digital Journalism, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2148549 Open Google Scholar
  40. Hepp, A., & Loosen, W. (2021). Pioneer journalism: Conceptualizing the role of pioneer journalists and pioneer communities in the organizational re-figuration of journalism. Journalism, 22(3), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919829277 Open Google Scholar
  41. Hoffjann, O. (2021). Public Relations und Journalismus [Public relations and journalism]. In P. Szyszka, R. Fröhlich & U. Röttger (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Public Relations (S. 1–22). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28149-6_17-1 Open Google Scholar
  42. Holt, K., Figenschou, T. U., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715 Open Google Scholar
  43. Holton, A. E., & Belair-Gagnon, V. (2018). Strangers to the game? Interlopers, intralopers, and shifting news production. Media and Communication, 6(4), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1490 Open Google Scholar
  44. Horak, G. (2008). Feministische Zeitschriften in Österreich. Feministischer Journalismus arbeitet nach anderen Qualitätskriterien [Feminist magazines in Austria. Feminist journalism works according to different quality criteria]. In L. Susemichel, S. Rudigier & G. Horak (Hrsg.), Feministische Medien: Öffentlichkeiten jenseits des Malestream (S. 19–31). U. Helmer. Open Google Scholar
  45. Ismail, A., Torosyan, G., & Tully, M. (2019). Social media, legacy media and gatekeeping: The protest paradigm in news of Ferguson and Charlottesville. The Communication Review, 22(3), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2019.1651153 Open Google Scholar
  46. Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Welles, B. F. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001 Open Google Scholar
  47. Kananovich, V., & Perreault, G. (2021). Audience as journalistic boundary worker: The rhetorical use of comments to critique media practice, assert legitimacy and claim authority. Journalism Studies, 22(3), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1869912 Open Google Scholar
  48. Keinert, A., Heft, A., & Dogruel, L. (2019). Wie sehen News-Entrepreneurs die Zukunft ihrer Profession? Vier Thesen zum Journalismus von morgen [How do news entrepreneurs see the future of their profession? Four theses on the journalism of tomorrow]. Journalistik. Zeitschrift für Journalismusforschung, 2(3), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1453/2569-152X-32019-10134-de Open Google Scholar
  49. Kinnebrock, S. (2005). Anita Augspurg (1857–1943). Feministin und Pazifistin zwischen Journalismus und Politik. Eine kommunikationshistorische Biographie [Anita Augspurg (1857–1943). Feminist and pacifist between journalism and politics. A biography from the perspective of communication history]. Centaurus. Open Google Scholar
  50. Kinnebrock, S., Klaus, E., & Wischermann, U. (2014). GrenzgängerInnentum als terra incognita der KommunikatorInnenforschung? Zum Potenzial von Autobiographien für die historische Berufsfeldforschung [Border crossers as terra incognita in communicator research? On the potential of autobiographies for historical vocational field research]. Medien & Zeit, 29(4), 5–15. Open Google Scholar
  51. Klaus, E. (2004). Öffentlichkeit und Privatheit: Frauenöffentlichkeiten und feministische Öffentlichkeiten [Public and private spheres: Female public spheres and feminist public spheres]. In R. Becker & B. Kortendiek (Hrsg.), Handbuch Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung. Theorie, Methoden, Empirie (S. 209–216). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  52. Klaus, E., & Wischermann, U. (2013). Journalistinnen. Eine Geschichte in Biographien und Texten 1848–1990 [Female journalists. A history in biographies and texts 1848–1990]. LIT. Open Google Scholar
  53. Laws, N., & Chojnicka, J. (2020). “A Future to believe in”: Introducing varieties of advocacy journalism. The examples sustainability and the Sanders campaign. Journalism Studies, 21(9), 1261–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1742773 Open Google Scholar
  54. Lenz, I. (2019). Feminismus: Denkweisen, Differenzen, Debatten [Feminism: mindsets, differences, debates]. In B. Kortendiek, B. Riegraf & K. Sabisch (Hrsg.), Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung (S. 231–241). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12496-0_18 Open Google Scholar
  55. Lilienthal, V. (2017). Recherchejournalismus für das Gemeinwohl. Correctiv – eine Journalismusorganisation neuen Typs in der Entwicklung [Investigative journalism for the common good. Correctiv – a new type of journalism organization in development]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 659–681. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-659 Open Google Scholar
  56. Lilienthal, V., & Neverla, I. (Hrsg.). (2017). Lügenpresse. Anatomie eines Kampfbegriffs [Lying press. Anatomy of a tendentious term]. Kiepenheuer & Witsch. Open Google Scholar
  57. Loosen, W. (2015). The notion of the „blurring boundaries“: Journalism as a (de-)differentiated phenomenon. Digital Journalism, 3(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.928000 Open Google Scholar
  58. Loosen, W., Ahva, L., Reimer, J., Solbach, P., Deuze, M., & Matzat, L. (2022). ‘X Journalism’. Exploring journalism’s diverse meanings through the names we give it. Journalism, 23(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920950090 Open Google Scholar
  59. Lünenborg, M. (1997). Journalistinnen in Europa: Eine international vergleichende Analyse zum Gendering im sozialen System Journalismus [Female journalists in Europe: An international comparative analysis of gendering in the social system of journalism]. Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  60. Lünenborg, M. (2005). Journalismus als kultureller Prozess: Zur Bedeutung von Journalismus in der Mediengesellschaft. Ein Entwurf [Journalism as a cultural process: On the significance of journalism in the media society. An outline]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  61. Lünenborg, M., Raetzsch, C., Reißmann, W., & Siemon, M. (2020). Media Practice in performativen Öffentlichkeiten: Für eine praxistheoretische Positionierung der Journalismusforschung [Media practice in performative publics: Toward a practice-theoretical positioning of journalism research]. In J. Schützeneder, K. Meier & N. Springer (Hrsg.), Neujustierung der Journalistik/Journalismusforschung in der digitalen Gesellschaft: Proceedings zur Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Journalistik/Journalismusforschung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 2019 (S. 34–51). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft e.V. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.70817 Open Google Scholar
  62. Martini, F. (2020). Wer ist #MeToo? Eine netzwerkanalytische Untersuchung (anti-)feministischen Protests auf Twitter [Who is #MeToo? A network analysis of (anti-)feminist protests on twitter]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 68(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2020-3-255 Open Google Scholar
  63. Meier, K. (2019). Berichterstattungsmuster als Strategie der Komplexitätsreduktion [Reporting patterns as a strategy for complexity reduction]. In B. Dernbach, A. Godulla & A. Sehl (Hrsg.), Komplexität im Journalismus (S. 101–116). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22860-6_10 Open Google Scholar
  64. Mellado, C. (2019). Journalists’ professional roles and role performance. In M. Powers (Hrsg.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.832 Open Google Scholar
  65. Mellado, C., & Alfaro, A. (2020). Platforms, journalists and their digital selves. Digital Journalism, 8(10), 1258–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1817763 Open Google Scholar
  66. Møller Hartley, J., & Askanius, T. (2021). Activist-journalism and the norm of objectivity: Role performance in the reporting of the #MeToo movement in Denmark and Sweden. Journalism Practice, 15(6), 860–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1805792 Open Google Scholar
  67. Neuberger, C. (2014). Konflikt, Konkurrenz und Kooperation. Interaktionsmodi in einer Theorie der dynamischen Netzwerköffentlichkeit [Conflict, competition and cooperation. Modes of interaction in a theory of dynamic networked public sphere]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 62(4), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2014-4-567 Open Google Scholar
  68. Neuberger, C., Nuernbergk, C., & Langenohl, S. (2019). Journalism as multichannel communication. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1260–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1507685 Open Google Scholar
  69. Örnebring, H. (2013). Anything you can do, I can do better? Professional journalists on citizen journalism in six European countries. International Communication Gazette, 75(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512461761 Open Google Scholar
  70. Pfetsch, B., Löblich, M., & Eilders, C. (2018). Dissonante Öffentlichkeiten als Perspektive kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung [Dissonant public spheres. A new perspective in communication theory]. Publizistik, 63(4), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-018-0441-1 Open Google Scholar
  71. Raetzsch, C., & Lünenborg, M. (2020). Anchoring practices for public connection: Media practice and its challenges for journalism studies. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2868–2886. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11213/3100 Open Google Scholar
  72. Reschke, A. (2018). Haltung zeigen! [Show attitude!] Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  73. Robinson, S. (2010). Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist – audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347719 Open Google Scholar
  74. Rosen, J. (2010). The view from nowhere: Questions and answers. PressThink. https://pressthink.org/2010/11/the-view-from-nowhere-questions-and-answers/ Open Google Scholar
  75. Rucht, D. (2004). The quadruple ‘A’: media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In W. Van de Donk, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon & D. Rucht (Hrsg.), Cyberprotest (S. 29–56). Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  76. Schapals, A. K. (2022). Peripheral actors in journalism: Deviating from the norm? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003144663 Open Google Scholar
  77. Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Twitter and the rise of personal publics. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (Hrsg.), Twitter and Society (S. 3–14). Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  78. Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news. A social history of American newspapers. Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  79. Schultz, T. (2021). Der Reporter-Blick von nirgendwo?: Journalismus in der Spannung zwischen Objektivität und Subjektivität [A reporter’s view from nowhere? Journalism’s tension between objectivity and subjectivity]. Publizistik, 66(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-020-00624-1 Open Google Scholar
  80. Schulz, W. (1990). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien. Analyse der aktuellen Berichterstattung [The construction of reality in the news media. Analysis of current reporting] (2. Aufl.). Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar
  81. Seiler, M. (2021). Ergebnisse meiner Masterarbeit: Feministische Journalist*innen erleben einen beruflichen Rollenkonflikt [Results of my master’s thesis: Feminist journalists experience a professional role conflict]. Open Google Scholar
  82. Singer, J. B. (2015). Out of bounds: Professional norms as boundary markers. In M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (Hrsg.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation (S. 21–36). Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  83. Sobieraj, S. (2010). Reporting conventions: Journalists, activists, and the thorny struggle for political visibility. Social Problems, 57(4), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.4.505 Open Google Scholar
  84. Susemichel, L., Rudigier, S., & Horak, G. (Hrsg.) (2008). Feministische Medien: Öffentlichkeiten jenseits des Malestream [Feminist media: Public spheres beyond the malestream]. U. Helmer. Open Google Scholar
  85. Swart, J., Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2017). Repositioning news and public connection in every­day life: A user-oriented perspective on inclusiveness, engagement, relevance, and constructiveness. Media, Culture & Society, 39(6), 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716679034 Open Google Scholar
  86. Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual. An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660–679. Open Google Scholar
  87. Usher, N. (2016). Interactive journalism: Hackers, data and code. University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar
  88. Vos, T. P., & Moore, J. (2020). Building the journalistic paradigm: Beyond paradigm repair. Journalism, 21(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918767586 Open Google Scholar
  89. Wallace, L. R. (2017). Objectivity is dead, and I’m okay with it. Medium. https://medium.com/@lewispants/objectivity-is-dead-and-im-okay-with-it-7fd2b4b5c58f Open Google Scholar
  90. Wallace, L. R. (2019). The view from somewhere: Undoing the myth of journalistic objectivity. University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  91. Weinberger, D. (2009). Transparency is the new objectivity. https://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/07/19/transparency-is-the-new-objectivity/ Open Google Scholar
  92. Wimmer, J. (2007). (Gegen-)Öffentlichkeit in der Mediengesellschaft: Analyse eines medialen Spannungsverhältnisses [(Counter)Public sphere in the media society: Analysis of a media tension.]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90549-5 Open Google Scholar
  93. Zelizer, B. (1990). Achieving journalistic authority through narrative. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(4), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360185 Open Google Scholar
  94.   Open Google Scholar

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Download complete (PDF)

Share via email

Media