Enforcement of civil judgements – responsible law enforcement authorities, procedural obstacles and current issues in Uganda
Table of contents
Bibliographic information

KAS African Law Study Library
Volume 3 (2016), Edition 3
- Authors:
- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Copyright year
- 2016
- ISSN-Online
- 2363-6262
- ISSN-Print
- 2363-6262
Chapter information
Volume 3 (2016), Edition 3
Enforcement of civil judgements – responsible law enforcement authorities, procedural obstacles and current issues in Uganda
- Authors:
- ISSN-Print
- 2363-6262
- ISSN-Online
- 2363-6262
- Preview:
This paper gives an over view of the Execution process in Uganda. Execution is provided by law as a means to realise the fruits of judgment. The Civil Procedure Act and Rules made therein provide a seemingly well structured manner of executing any matters but this is marred by the legal gymnastics that fall in play hence causing unnecessary delays.There are various actors in the process of execution of which may not be ignored by parties to an execution. The court which passes the decree or the court to which a decree is sent for execution plays a critical mandate in helping a successful litigant. The Advocates play the role of choosing the mode of execution, the attachable property and giving a helping hand to the bailiff in the process. The Bailiff whom the law demands should be one registered for that purpose is the foot soldier that carries out the actual execution. The Bailiff is assisted by the Police, Local Council authorities and the prisons authorities who hold the judgment debtor in custody. The principle judge of late has advised that courts should stop sending the judgment debtors to prisons in order to decongest them but again this destroys the very purpose of arrest and detention which is to scare the judgment debtor into paying the said sums of money demanded by warrant.
Bibliography
No match found. Try another term.
- Acts of Parliamentand Statutory Instruments (S.I) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Advocates Act, Chapter 267, Laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Civil Procedure Act, Chapter 7, Laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Civil Procedure Rules, S.I 7-1, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement Act, Chapter.9, Laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Government Proceedings Act, Chapter 77, Laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Government Proceedings (Civil Procedure) Rules S.I 77-1, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Judicature Act, Chapter 13, laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Judicature (Court Bailiffs) Rules S.I 13-16, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Local Government Act, Chapter 243, Laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Maintenance Orders Enforcement Act, Chapter 17, Laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Maintenance Orders Enforcement Rules S.I 17-1, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Police Act, Chapter 303, Laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act, Chapter 21, Laws of Uganda, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Uganda Railways Corporation Act, Chapter 331, Laws of Uganda. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Case Law Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Bifabusha V Turyazooka [2000] 2 E.A 330 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Caltex Oil (U) Limited Vs Petro (Uganda) Limited and Sam KirondeMiscellaneous Application No.279 of 2004 (Arising from Misc. Application No. 86 of 2004 and C.S no. 533 of 2002. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Corporate insurance Co. limited vs. Samex Insurance Brokers Ltd (2002) I EA 41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Immelda Nassanga Vs Stanbic Bank & another (2007) HCB Vol. 1, 57. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Immelda Nassanga Vs Stanbic Bank & another Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Orient Bank Limited Versus Fredrick J.K Zaabwe and Mars Trading Co. Limited, Supreme Court Civil Application No. 19 of 2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392
- Registrar, Trustees, Kampala Arch Diocese and Anor. Vs Harriet Namakula and Others [1997-2001] UCLR, Page 365 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-3-392