Social habitus and climate change: Rethinking demand-side mitigation through Eliasian figurational sociology

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 10 (2025), Issue 2
Open Access Full access

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Volume 10 (2025), Issue 2


Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2026
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Chapter information


Open Access Full access

Volume 10 (2025), Issue 2

Social habitus and climate change: Rethinking demand-side mitigation through Eliasian figurational sociology


Authors:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742


Preview:

This article explores the analytical potential of Norbert Elias’s notion of social habitus for understanding resistance and change in everyday practices relevant to demand-side climate mitigation. It unfolds in two steps. First, it revisits the concept of social habitus, emphasising its value for interpreting the emotional and figurational dimensions of social practices. Second, it applies this theoretical lens to focus group data collected in Italy to examine how emotions, identity, and social interdependencies sustain high-carbon habits despite widespread environmental awareness. By integrating theoretical and empirical analysis, the paper shows how the habitus can serve as a key interpretive tool for understanding the emotional foundations of resistance to behavioural change.

Bibliography


  1. Abrahamse, W. (2019). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: What works, what doesn’t, and why. Academic Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  2. Bowen P., van Heerikhuizen B. & Emirbayer M. (2012). Elias and Bourdieu. Journal of Classical Sociology, 12, 69–93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  3. Buccarelli, F. (2011). Fra sociogenesi e psicogenesi: Il “lato oscuro" dell’habitus sociale. Cambio. Rivista sulle trasformazioni sociali, 1(2), 75–88. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  4. Bucholc, M. (Ed.). (2024). Established-outsiders Relations in Poland: Reconfiguring Elias and Scotson. Springer Nature. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  5. Camic, C. (1986). The matter of habit. American journal of sociology, 91(5), 1039–1087. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  6. Corchia L. (2020), La teoria bourdieusiana dell’habitus. Pensare con e contro Durkheim. «Lo Sguardo – rivista di filosofia, 31(2), 99–123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  7. Déchaux J.H. (1993). N. Elias et P. Bourdieu analyse conceptuelle comparée. Archives européennes de sociologie, 34 (2), 364–385 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  8. Dendasck C. V., Lopes G.F. (2016). Conceito de Habitus em Pierre Bourdieu e Norbert Elias. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do conhecimento. 3 (5), 01–10 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  9. Dietz, T. (2014). “Understanding Environmentally Significant Consumption.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 14: 5067–5068. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  10. Elias, N. (1939/2012). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [The Civilising Process, Collected Works, vol. 3, UCD Press]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  11. Elias, N. (1969/2006). Die höfische Gesellschaft: Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Königtums und der höfischen Aristokratie mit einer Einleitung: Soziologie und Geschichtswissenschaft. Neuwied: Luchterhand.[The Court Society, Collected Works, vol. 2, UCD Press] Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  12. Elias, N. (1987/2009). On Human Beings and Their Emotions: A Process-Sociological Essay. Theory, Culture & Society, 4(2–3), 339–361. [in Essay III, Collected Works, vol. 16, pp. 141–158]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  13. Elias, N. (1987/2010). Die Gesellschaft der Individuen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, [The society of individuals, Collected Works, vol 10, UCD Press]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  14. Elias, N. (1984/2007). Über die Zeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Time: An essay Collected Works, vol 9, UCD Press]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  15. Elias, N. (1989/2013). Studien über die Deutschen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [The Germans: Power struggles and the development of habitus in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Collected Works, vol 11, UCD Press]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  16. Elias, N., & Scotson, J. L. (1965/2008). The Established and the Outsiders, London: Frank Cass & Co.] [Collected works, Vol. 9, UCD Press]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  17. Ernst, S., Weischer, C., & Alikhani, B. (2017). Changing power relations and the drag effects of habitus: Theoretical and empirical approaches in the twenty-first century. An introduction. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 7–21. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  18. Feuerhahn W: (2009), Une sociologie des habitus nationaux: Norbert Elias et l’héritage de Heidelberg, Individu & nation, 3, DOI: 10.58335/individuetnation.167. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  19. Freud, S. (1923). Das Ich und das Es. (Italian ed. L’Io e l’Es, 2010, Newton Compton: Rome). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  20. Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of consumer culture, 11(1), 79–99. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  21. Hertwich, E. G. & Peters, G. P. (2009). Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 16: 6414–6420. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  22. IPCC (2023): Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  23. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  24. Kuzmics, H. (2000). Nationaler Habitus und Handlungstheorie: Das Beispiel von Autoritaet und Selbstironie im österreichischen Charakter. In Zivilisationstheorie in der Bilanz: Beiträge zum 100. Geburtstag von Norbert Elias (pp. 221–242). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  25. Kuzmics, H., Reicher, D., & Hughes, J. (2020). State, emotion, authority, and national habitus: State-related problems of our time and methodological discourses in sociology and historical sociology. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 45(1), 7–41. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  26. Marasco V. & Perulli A. (forthcoming) Perché fatichiamo a cambiare rotta verso un futuro sostenibile? L’inerzia ecologica attraverso la sociologica figurazionale, in AA.VV. Questione ecologica e mutamento sociale: le sfide per la teoria sociologica, Morlacchi. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  27. Mennell, S. (2007). The American civilizing process. Polity. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  28. Mennell, S., & Dunning, E. (1996). Preface. In N. Elias, The Germans (pp. vii–xvi). Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  29. Perulli, A. (2011). Beyond dichotomous thinking: The society of individuals. Cambio. Rivista sulle trasformazioni sociali, 1(1), 6–22. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  30. Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(6), 1273–1285. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  31. Shove, E., Watson, M., & Pantzar, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  32. Sieczka, E. (2025). National Figurations under Hysteresis in Norbert Elias and Pierre Bourdieu: From Plural to Cleft National Habitus. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 31(1), 95–113. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  33. Sommer, B. (2011). Interdependenzen und Ungleichzeitigkeiten im Kontext des anthropogenen Klimawandels. Leviathan, 39(1), 55–72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  34. Wacquant L. (2013). Homines in extremis: Che cosa gli studiosi lottatori ci insegnano sull’habitus. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 6(2), 169–182. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  35. Wacquant, L. (2016). A concise genealogy and anatomy of habitus. The sociological review, 64(1), 64–72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex