Social media, self-pornography, and gay/bisexual/queer men’s psychosexual wellbeing

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Volume 13 (2024), Issue 4
Open Access Full access

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Volume 13 (2024), Issue 4

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2025
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 13 (2024), Issue 4

Social media, self-pornography, and gay/bisexual/queer men’s psychosexual wellbeing

Authors:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
Preview:

Despite the internet’s historical significance for LGBTQ+ identities and communities, contemporary public health research overlooks how gay, bisexual, and queer (GBQ+) men utilise online spaces for sexual expression and connections. This study ­explores the role of pornographic content creation and sharing on social media among Australian GBQ+ men, addressing the gap in understanding its implications for health and wellbeing. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among N = 596 men (Mage = 36.1 years; SD = 11.4) in Australia, allowing us to investigate their practices of producing and sharing pornographic content on social media. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were employed to explore demographics, psychosexual wellbeing, and motivations for content creation. It was found that 71.3% of participants reported producing sexual self-representations, and 15.1% shared this content publicly on social media, without commercial interest. Participants who produced content (either for sharing privately or publicly) exhibited higher sex positivity and sexual self-esteem than those not producing content. There was no significant difference regarding age or sexual orientation. Qualitative analysis revealed the key motivations for sharing sexual content on social media were for arousal, connection, and validation. These findings underscore the multifaceted motivations behind GBQ+ men’s engagement with pornographic content creation, emphasising its role in social connection and personal validation. Recognising these practices within health frameworks is crucial for understanding and accommodating GBQ+ men’s digital sexual cultures.

Bibliography

  1. Ashford, C., & Longstaff, G. (2022). Toward a politics of “raw dicks”: Authenticity, the alt-self, and new understandings of the phallus. Journal of Bodies, Sexualities, and Masculinities, 3(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.3167/jbsm.2022.030107 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  2. Ashton, S., McDonald, K., & Kirkman, M. (2019). What does ‘pornography’ mean in the digi¬tal age? Revisiting a definition for social science researchers. Porn Studies, 6(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2018.1544096 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  4. Byron, P. (2019). ‘How could you write your name below that?’ The queer life and death of Tumblr. Porn Studies, 6(3), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2019.1613925 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  5. Byron, P., Robards, B., Hanckel, B., Vivienne, S., & Churchill, B. (2019). “Hey, I’m having these experiences”: Tumblr use and young people’s queer (dis)connections. International Journal of Communication, 13, 2239–2259. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9677 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  6. Campbell, J. E. (2004). Getting it on online: Cyberspace, gay male sexuality, and embodied identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783840 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  7. Cao, R. J. D. (2021). Gay amateur porn on twitter in the Philippines: Primitive aesthetics and affect. Synoptique, 9(2), 124–138. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2825442864/ abstract/72CF6995E1B74165PQ/1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  8. Corneau, S., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., Bernatchez, K., & Beauchemin, M. (2017). Gay male pornog¬raphy: A study of users’ perspectives. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(3), 223–245. https://doi.or g/10.1080/19419899.2017.1360931 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  9. Dean, T. (2014). Introduction: Pornography, technology, archive. In T. Dean, S. Ruszczycky, & D. Squires (Eds.), Porn Archives (pp. 1–26). Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  10. Demant, D., Hides, L., White, K. M., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2018). Effects of participation in and connectedness to the LGBT community on substance use involvement of sexual minority young people. Addictive Behaviors, 81, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.028 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  11. Demant, D., Byron, P., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Saliba, B., & Newton, J. D. A. (2024). The nexus between porn and psychosocial/psychosexual wellbeing among gay and bisexual men. Porn Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2024.2335975 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  12. Ding, R., & Song, L. (2023). Digital sexual publics: Understanding do-it-yourself gay porn and lived experiences of sexuality in China. International Journal of Communication, 17, 2463–2478. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19800 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  13. Downing, M. J., Schrimshaw, E. W., Scheinmann, R., Antebi-Gruszka, N., & Hirshfield, S. (2017). Sexually explicit media use by sexual identity: A comparative analysis of gay, bisexual, and heterosexual men in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1763–1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0837-9 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  14. En, B., En, M., & Griffiths, D. (2013). Gay stuff and guy stuff: The construction of sexual iden¬tities in sidebars on Reddit. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2013.61.293 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  15. Formby, E. (2022). LGBT ‘communities’ and the (self-)regulation and shaping of intimacy. So¬ciological Research Online, 27(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780420974031 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  16. Frost, D. M., & Meyer, I. H. (2012). Measuring community connectedness among diverse sexual minority populations. The Journal of Sex Research, 49(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1 080/00224499.2011.565427 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  17. Grov, C., Breslow, A. S., Newcomb, M. E., Rosenberger, J. G., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2014). Gay and bisexual men’s use of the internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.871626 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  18. Hakim, J. (2019). Work that body: male bodies in digital culture. Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  19. Hangen, F., & Rogge, R. D. (2022). Focusing the conceptualization of erotophilia and eroto¬phobia on global attitudes toward sex: development and validation of the sex positivity– negativity scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508- 021-02085-7 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  20. Kubicek, K., Beyer, W. J., Weiss, G., Iverson, E., & Kipke, M. D. (2010). In the dark: Young men’s stories of sexual initiation in the absence of relevant sexual health information. Health Education & Behavior, 37(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109339993 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  21. Kvalem, I. L., Træen, B., & Iantaffi, A. (2015). Internet pornography use, body ideals, and sexual self-esteem in Norwegian gay and bisexual men. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(4), 522–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1083782 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  22. Lammers, J., & Stoker, J. I. (2019). Power affects sexual assertiveness and sexual esteem equal¬ly in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10508-018-1285-5 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  23. Laurin, D. (2019). Subscription intimacy: Amateurism, authenticity and emotional labour in direct-to-consumer gay pornography. About Gender - International Journal of Gender Stud¬ies, 8(16), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.15167/2279-5057/AG2019.8.16.1114 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  24. Maddison, S. (2017). Comradeship of cock? Gay porn and the entrepreneurial voyeur. Porn Studies, 4(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2017.1304235 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  25. McKee, A., Byron, P., Litsou, K., & Ingham, R. (2020). An interdisciplinary definition of por¬nography: Results from a global delphi panel. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01554-4 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  26. Miles, S. (2018). Still getting it on online: Thirty years of queer male spaces brokered through digital technologies. Geography Compass, 12(11), e12407. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12407 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  27. Miller, B. (2022). Exploring the posting of nude photographs on Reddit in relation to self-esteem, perceived attractiveness, narcissism, and sensation seeking. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(6), 3083–3092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02301-y Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  28. Miller, D. J., Raggatt, P. T. F., & McBain, K. (2020). A literature review of studies into the prevalence and frequency of men’s pornography use. American Journal of Sexuality Educa¬tion, 15(4), 502–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2020.1831676 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  29. Mowlabocus, S. (2007). Gay men and the pornification of everyday life. In K. Nikunen, S. Paasonen, & L. Saarenmaa (Eds.), Pornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture (pp. 61–71). Berg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  30. Paasonen, S., Jarrett, K., & Light, B. (2019). #NSFW: Sex, humor, and risk in social media. MIT Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  31. Race, K. (2018). Towards a pragmatics of sexual media/networking devices. Sexualities, 21(8), 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718781538 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  32. Robards, B. (2018). ‘Totally straight’: Contested sexual identities on social media site reddit. Sexualities, 21(1–2), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716678563 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  33. Robards, B., Byron, P., & D’Souza, S. (2021). LGBTQ+ communities and digital media. In D. A. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  34. Roig-Mora, A., Ventura, R., Larrea, O., & Blanco-Fernández, V. (2024). (Homo)masculinities: Dating apps and body image among young gay users in Spain. Journal of LGBT Youth, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2024.2310652 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  35. Snell Jr, W. E., Fisher, T. D., & Schuh, T. (1992). Reliability and validity of the sexuality scale: A measure of sexual-esteem, sexual-depression, and sexual-preoccupation. The Journal of Sex Research, 29(2), 261–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499209551646 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  36. Stout, C. D., Paredes, C. D., & Nelson, K. M. (2023). “I wish I actually had known what the heck sex was:” What adolescent sexual minority males knew and wish they knew prior to sexual debut with a male partner. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 20, 84–93. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00682-8 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  37. Tiidenberg, K. (2014). Bringing sexy back: Reclaiming the body aesthetic via self-shooting. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/ CP2014-1-3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  38. Tiidenberg, K., & van der Nagel, E. (2020). Sex and social media. Emerald Publishing Limited. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  39. Tziallas, E. (2015). Gamified eroticism: Gay male “social networking” applications and self-pornography. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9288-z Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  40. van der Nagel, E. (2021). Competing platform imaginaries of NSFW content creation on On¬lyFans. Porn Studies, 8(4), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2021.1974927 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  41. Veinot, T. C., Meadowbrooke, C. C., Loveluck, J., Hickok, A., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2013). How “community” matters for how people interact with information: Mixed methods study of young men who have sex with other men. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), e2370. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2370 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  42. Wang, S., & Ding, R. (2022). “Business inquiries are welcome”: Sex influencers and the plat-formization of non-normative media on Twitter. Television & New Media, 23(8), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221077666 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  43. Wang, Y. (2021). The twink next door, who also does porn: Networked intimacy in gay porn performers’ self-presentation on social media. Porn Studies, 8(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/23268743.2020.1841019 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  44. Watson, B. M. (2021). A finding aid to the pornographic imaginary: Implications of amateur classifications on/by Reddit’s NSFW411. Porn Studies, 8(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.108 0/23268743.2020.1830590 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  45. Wignall, L. (2017). The sexual use of a social networking site: The case of pup Twitter. Socio¬logical Research Online, 22(3), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417724066 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  46. Yue, A. (2017). Trans-Singapore: Some notes towards queer Asia as method. Inter-Asia Cul¬tural Studies, 18(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2017.1273911 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  47.   Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Full download (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media