Haushaltsüberschüsse, konservative Parteien und das Trilemma der Fiskalpolitik

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift Volume 55 (2014), Edition 4
Full access

Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft

Volume 55 (2014), Edition 4

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Publication year
2014
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
ISSN-Print
0032-3470

Chapter information

Full access

Volume 55 (2014), Edition 4

Haushaltsüberschüsse, konservative Parteien und das Trilemma der Fiskalpolitik

Authors:
ISSN-Print
0032-3470
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Adams, James, und Zeynep Somer-Topcu. 2009. Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39: 825-846. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123409000635. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409000635
  2. Alesina, Alberto, und Silvia Ardagna. 2012. The Design of Fiscal Adjustments. NBER Working Paper 18423. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: 10.3386/w18423. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3386/w18423
  3. Alesina, Alberto, und Guido Tabellini. 1990. A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and ­Government Debt. Review of Economic Studies 57: 403-414. DOI: 10.2307/2298021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2298021
  4. Arndt, Christoph. 2014. Beating Social Democracy on Its Own Turf: Issue Convergence as Winning Formula for the Centre-Right in Universal Welfare States. Scandinavian Political Studies 37: 149-170. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9477.12018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12018
  5. Aulich, Chris. 2010. Reconstructing the Australian State: The Privatization Factor. In Dealing With Debt: Lessons From Abroad, Hrsg. John Springford, 74-92. London: Centre Forum. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.22459/RG.12.2010.01
  6. Bartlett, Bruce. 2007. “Starve the Beast”. Origins and Development of a Budgetary Metaphor. The Independent Review 12: 5-26. Open Google Scholar
  7. Battin, Tim. 2002. The Australian Labor Party and the Notion of Economic Management. Journal of Economic and Social Policy 6: 1-12. Open Google Scholar
  8. Becker, Gary S. 2001. The Real Reason We Need a Tax Cut. Business Week 28, 19.03.2001. Open Google Scholar
  9. Blomqvist, Paula. 2004. The Choice Revolution: Privatization of Swedish Welfare Services in the 1990s. Social Policy and Administration 38: 139-155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 9515.2004.00382.x. Open Google Scholar
  10. Boix, Carles. 2000. Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in Advanced Nations, 1960-93. World Politics 53: 38-73. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887100009370. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100009370
  11. Brender, Adi, und Allan Drazen. 2008. How Do Budget Deficits and Economic Growth Affect Reelection Prospects? Evidence from a Large Panel of Countries. American Economic Review 98: 2203-2220. DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.5.2203. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.2203
  12. Brown, Kevin. 1991. Riding to the End of a Wave. Financial Times, 24.05.1991. Open Google Scholar
  13. Costello, Peter. 1997. Charter of Budget Honesty Bill 1996, Second Reading. Commonwealth of Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 05.12.1997. Open Google Scholar
  14. Costello, Peter. 2000. Budget Speech 2000-01. Department of the Treasury. Canberra. Open Google Scholar
  15. Costello, Peter. 2008. The Costello Memoirs. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. Open Google Scholar
  16. Crean, Simon. 2003. Budget Debate. Commonwealth of Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 15.03.2003. Open Google Scholar
  17. Cusack, Thomas R. 1999. Partisan Politics and Fiscal Policy. Comparative Political Studies 32: 464-486. DOI: 10.1177/0010414099032004003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032004003
  18. Davidsson, Johan Bo, und Paul Marx. 2013. Losing the Issue, Losing the Vote: Issue Competition and the Reform of Unemployment Insurance in Germany and Sweden Political Studies 61: 505-522. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00997.x. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00997.x
  19. DeVries, Pete, Jaime Guajardo, Daniel Leigh, und Andrea Pescatori. 2011. A New Action-based Dataset of Fiscal Consolidation. IMF Working Paper 11/128. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5089/9781455264407.001
  20. Errington, Wayne, und Peter Van Onselen. 2007. John Winston Howard. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0712300103
  21. Fenna, Alan. 2007. Governing in Good Times: Fiscal Policy and Tax Reform in Australia 1996-2006. Australian Journal of Political Science 42: 329-350. DOI: 10.1080/ 10361140701320059. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361140701320059
  22. Finanzpolitischer Rat 2008. Swedish Fiscal Policy. Report of the Swedish Fiscal Policy Council 2008. Stockholm: Finanspolitiska rådet. Open Google Scholar
  23. Finanzpolitischer Rat 2009. Swedish Fiscal Policy. Report of the Swedish Fiscal Policy Council 2009. Stockholm: Finanspolitiska rådet. Open Google Scholar
  24. Franzese, Robert J. 2002. Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 5: 369-421. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112801.080924. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112801.080924
  25. Friedman, Milton. 2003. What Every American Wants. Wall Street Journal, 15.01.2003. Open Google Scholar
  26. Girouard, Nathalie, und Christophe André. 2005. Measuring Cyclically-adjusted Budget Balances for OECD Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 434. Paris: OECD. DOI: 10.1787/787626008442. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1787/787626008442
  27. Gittins, Ross. 1999. The high cost of paying less tax. Sydney Morning Herald, 25.08.1999. Open Google Scholar
  28. Gmeiner, Jens. 2013. Die „Zukunftspartei“ Schwedens? Die Schwedische Sozialdemokratie zwischen erfolgreicher Vergangenheit und unsicherer Zukunft. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Open Google Scholar
  29. Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2002. The Politics of Justification. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5117/9789053565902
  30. Green, John H. 1995. Public Finances, Adjustment Programs, and Debt Dynamics. In Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State, Hrsg. Desmond Lachman, Adam Bennett, John H. Green, Robert Hagemann und Ramana Ramaswamy, 20-29. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5089/9781557754868.084
  31. Gruen, David, und Amanda Sayegh. 2005. The Evolution of Fiscal Policy in Australia. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 21: 618-635. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/gri035. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri035
  32. Haffert, Lukas. 2014. Freiheit von Schulden - Freiheit zur Gestaltung? Die politische Ökonomie von Haushaltsüberschüssen. Köln: Universität zu Köln. Open Google Scholar
  33. Haffert, Lukas, und Philip Mehrtens. 2014. Haushaltsüberschüsse und ihre Verwendung: Wiedergewinnung staatlicher Handlungsfähigkeit? Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften (ZSE) 12: 210-241. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1610-7780-2014-2-3-210
  34. Haffert, Lukas, und Philip Mehrtens. Im Erscheinen. From Austerity to Expansion? Consolidation, Budget Surpluses, and the Decline of Fiscal Capacity. Politics & Society. Open Google Scholar
  35. Hancock, M. Donald. 2002. Sweden. In Politics in Europe. An Introduction to the Politics of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Russia, and the European Union, Hrsg. M. Donald Hancock, 347-401. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  36. Häusermann, Silja, Georg Picot, und Dominik Geering. 2013. Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State - Recent Advances in the Literature. British Journal of Political Science 43: 221-240. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000336. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000336
  37. Hellwig, Timothy. 2012. Constructing Accountability: Party Position Taking and Eco- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414011422516
  38. nomic Voting. Comparative Political Studies 45: 91-118. DOI: 10.1177/ 0010414011422516. Open Google Scholar
  39. Henriksson, Jens. 2007. Ten Lessons About Budget Consolidation. Brüssel: Bruegel. Open Google Scholar
  40. Hibbs, Douglas A., Jr. 1977. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review 71: 1467-1487. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055406232568. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406232568
  41. Hicks, Alexander M., und Duane H. Swank. 1992. Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960-82. The American Political Science Review 86: 658-674. DOI: 10.2307/1964129. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1964129
  42. Jensen, Carsten. 2010. Issue Compensation and Right-Wing Government Social Spending. European Journal of Political Research 49: 282-299. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765. 2009.01898.x. Open Google Scholar
  43. Kalyvas, Stathis N., und Kees Van Kersbergen. 2010. Christian Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 183-209. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.021406.172506. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.021406.172506
  44. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2001. Partisan Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment: When Do Politicians Choose Unpopular Policies? In The New Politics of the Welfare State, Hrsg. Paul Pierson, 265-302. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198297564.003.0010
  45. Lindbom, Anders. 2006. The Swedish Conservative Party and the Welfare State: Institutional Change and Adapting Preferences. Arbetsrapport 2006: 12. Stockholm: Institutet för Framtidsstudier. Open Google Scholar
  46. Martin, Aaron. 2011. Partisan Identification and Attitudes to Big Versus Small Government in Australia: Evidence from the ISSP. Australian Journal of Political Science 46: 243-256. DOI:10.1080/10361146.2011.567971. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2011.567971
  47. McFarlane, Ian. 2006. The real reasons why it was the 1990s recession we had to have. The Age 02.12.2006. http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/the-real-reasons-why-it-was-the-1990s-recession-we-had-to-have/2006/12/01/1164777791623.html. Zugegriffen: 24.10.2014. Open Google Scholar
  48. Mehrtens, Philip. 2014. Staatsschulden und Staatstätigkeit. Zur Transformation der politischen Ökonomie Schwedens. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  49. Morgan, Iwan W. 2009. The Age of Deficits. Presidents and Unbalanced Budgets from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Open Google Scholar
  50. Murphy, Katharine. 2007. Labor seizes on Lib’s Future Fund backing. The Age 27.03.2007. <http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/labor-seizes-on-libs-future-fund-backing/2007/03/26/1174761379941.html>. Zugegriffen: 24.10.2014. Open Google Scholar
  51. Newspoll. 1996. Federal Budget: Impact on Economy. http://polling.newspoll.com.au.tmp.anchor.net.au/cgi-bin/polling/display_poll_data.pl. Zugegriffen: 24.10.2014. Open Google Scholar
  52. Niskanen, William A. 2006. Limiting Government: The Failure of „Starve the Beast“. Cato Journal 26: 553-558. Open Google Scholar
  53. OECD 2013. OECD Economic Outlook Database: Statistics and Projections. Paris: OECD. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1787/data-00655-en
  54. OECD AUS. 1997. OECD Economic Survey: Australia. Paris: OECD. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-aus-1997-en
  55. OECD AUS. 1999. OECD Economic Survey: Australia. Paris: OECD. Open Google Scholar
  56. OECD AUS. 2010. OECD Economic Survey: Australia. Paris: OECD. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-aus-2010-en
  57. Persson, Torsten, und Lars E. O. Svensson. 1989. Why a Stubborn Conservative would Run a Deficit: Policy with Time-Inconsistent Preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 325-345. DOI: 10.2307/2937850. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2937850
  58. Picot, Georg. 2009. Party Competition and Reforms of Unemployment Benefits in Germany: How a Small Change in Electoral Demand Can Make a Big Difference. German Politics 18: 155-179. DOI: 10.1080/09644000902874257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09644000902874257
  59. Pierson, Paul. 2001. From Expansion to Austerity. The New Politics of Taxing and Spending. In Seeking the Center: Politics and Policymaking in the New Century, Hrsg. Martin A. Levin, Marc K. Landy und Martin Shapiro, 54-80. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198297564.003.0014
  60. Rexed, Knud. 1999. Schwedische Steuerpolitik. In Schweden im Wandel: Entwicklungen, Probleme, Perspektiven, Hrsg. Claudius H. Riegler und Olaf Schneider, 217-230. Berlin: BWV - Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag. Open Google Scholar
  61. Romer, Christina, und David Romer. 2009. Do Tax Cuts Starve the Beast? The Effect of Tax Changes on Government Spending. NBER Working Paper No. 13548. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Open Google Scholar
  62. Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter. The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  63. Settergren, Ole. 2001. The Automatic Balance Mechanism of the Swedish Pension System. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 48: 339-349. Open Google Scholar
  64. Stein, Herbert. 1969. The Fiscal Revolution in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  65. Steinmo, Sven. 2010. The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  66. Stockman, David. 1986. The Triumph of Politics. How the Reagan Revolution Failed. New York: Harper & Row. Open Google Scholar
  67. Streeck, Wolfgang, und Kathleen Thelen, 2005. Introduction: Institutional Change in ­Advanced Political Economies. In dies.: Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, 3-39. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  68. Svallfors, Stefan. 2011. A Bedrock of Support? Trends in Welfare State Attitudes in ­Sweden, 1981-2010. Social Policy & Administration 45: 806-825. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1467-9515.2011.00796.x. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00796.x
  69. Swan, Wayne. 2008. Budget Speech 2008-09. Canberra: Department of the Treasury. Open Google Scholar
  70. The New York Times. 25.01.1987. The State of the President. Open Google Scholar
  71. Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  72. Turnbull, Malcolm. 2009. Budget Debate. Commonwealth of Australia, Parliamentary ­Debates, House of Representatives, 14.05.2009. Open Google Scholar
  73. Turner, David. 2006. Should Measures of Fiscal Stance be Adjusted for Terms of Trade ­Effects? OECD Economics Department Working Paper 519. Paris: OECD Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1787/416678318453
  74. Wagschal, Uwe. 1996. Staatsverschuldung: Ursachen im internationalen Vergleich. Op­laden: Leske+Budrich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11473-4_3
  75. Walter, Ryan, und John Uhr. 2013. Budget Talk: Rhetorical Constraints and Contests. Australian Journal of Political Science 48: 431-444. DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2013.837426. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.837426
  76. Wanna, John. 2006. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: the Nonsense of Australia’s Charter of Budget Honesty Act 1998. Paper presented at the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference. University of Newcastle. Open Google Scholar
  77. Wenzelburger, Georg. 2010. Haushaltskonsolidierungen und Reformprozesse. Determinanten, Konsolidierungsprofile und Reformstrategien in der Analyse. Berlin: LIT Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  78. Williams, Paul D. 2008. The 2007 Australian Federal Election: The Story of Labor’s Return from the Electoral Wilderness. Australian Journal of Politics and History 54: 104-125. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2008.00487.x. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2008.00487.x
  79. Wilson, Shaun. 2013. The Limits of Low-Tax Social Democracy? Welfare, Tax and Fiscal Dilemmas for Labor in Government. Australian Journal of Political Science 48: 286-306. DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2013.821102. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.821102

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Share via email

Media