Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: wt Werkstattstechnik online Volume 115 (2025), Edition 03
Open Access Full access

wt Werkstattstechnik online

Volume 115 (2025), Edition 03

Authors:
Publisher
VDI fachmedien, Düsseldorf
Copyright year
2025
ISSN-Online
1436-4980
ISSN-Print
1436-4980

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 115 (2025), Edition 03

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis

ISSN-Print
1436-4980
ISSN-Online
1436-4980
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. [1] Liebers, F.; Brendler, C.; Latza, U.: Berufsspezifisches Risiko für das Auftreten von Arbeitsunfähigkeit durch Muskel-Skelett-Erkrankungen und Krankheiten des Herz-Kreislauf-Systems. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA) 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  2. [2] Schlick, C.; Bruder, R.; Luczak, H.: Arbeitswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  3. [3] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; Kok, J.; Vroonhof, P. et al.: Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Prevalence, Costs and Demographics in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2019, doi.org/10.2802/66947 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  4. [4] Brenscheidt, S.; Siefer, A.; Hinnenkamp, H. et al.: Arbeitswelt im Wandel: Zahlen – Daten – Fakten. Ausgabe 2020. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA) 2020, doi.org/10.21934/baua:praxis20200131 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  5. [5] Eurofound; Wilczynska, A.; Cabrita, J. et al.: 6th European Working Conditions Survey: 2017 Update. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2017, doi.org/10.2806/422172 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  6. [6] Holzgreve, F.; Schulte, L.; Oremek, G. et al.: Allgemeine und arbeitsplatzbezogene Risikofaktoren von Muskel-Skelett-Erkrankungen und deren Bestimmungsmethoden. Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie 73 (2023) 4, S. 182–189 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  7. [7] Brendler, C.: Alters- und berufsspezifische Unterschiede für das Auftreten von Arbeitsunfähigkeit aufgrund ausgewählter Herz-Kreislauf- sowie Muskel-Skelett-Erkrankungen. Dissertation, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  8. [8] Ilmarinen, J.; Tempel, J.: Erhaltung, Förderung und Entwicklung der Arbeitsfähigkeit – Konzepte und Forschungsergebnisse aus Finnland. In: Badura, B.; Schellschmidt, H.; Vetter, C. (Hrsg.): Demographischer Wandel: Herausforderung für die betriebliche Personal- und Gesundheitspolitik – Zahlen, Daten, Analysen aus allen Branchen der Wirtschaft. BerHeidelberg: Springer 2003, S. 85–99, doi.org/10.1007/978–3–642–59351–2_7 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  9. [9] Rudow, B.; Neubauer, W.; Krüger, W. et al.: Die betriebliche Integration leistungsgewandelter Mitarbeiter – Ein Arbeits- und Personalprojekt aus der Automobilindustrie. Arbeit 16 (2007) 2, S. 118–131 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  10. [10] Börner, K.; Löffler, T.; Bullinger-Hoffmann, A. C. (Hrsg.): CheckAge – Screening-Verfahren für die Bewertung alter(n)sgerechter Arbeitsplätze. Chemnitz: aw&I – Wissenschaft und Praxis Verlag 2017, doi.org/10.14464/awir.v1i2.13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  11. [11] Bullinger-Hoffmann, A.C.; Mühlstedt, J. (Hrsg.): Homo Sapiens Digitalis – Virtuelle Ergonomie und digitale Menschmodelle. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  12. [12] Spitzhirn, M.; Ullmann, S.; Fritzsche, L.: Considering individual abilities and age-related changes in digital production planning—human-centered design of industrial work tasks with ema software. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 76 (2022) 4, S. 459–477, doi.org/10.1007/s41449–022–00343–5 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  13. [13] imk Industrial Intelligence GmbH: Homepage. Stand: 2024. Internet: imk-industrial-intelligence.com/. Zugriff am 27.01.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  14. [14] Spitzhirn, M., Ullmann, S., Bauer, S. et al.: Digital production planning and human simulation of manual and hybrid work processes using the ema Software Suite. Proceedings of the 7th International Digital Human Modeling Symposium 7 (1), 2022, Iowa, USA, p.20–32, doi.org/10.17077/dhm.31816 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  15. [15] Spitzhirn, M., Gärtner, C., Ullmann, S. et al.: Considering Individual Abilities and Age-Related Changes in Digital Production Planning Using Digital Human Models. In: Scataglini, S.; Harih, G.; Saeys, W.; Truijen, S. (eds.): DHM 2023, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 744, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi.org/10.1007/978–3–031–37848–5_28 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  16. [16] Spitzhirn, M.; Gärtner, C.; Fritzsche F.: Digital planning of ability-appropriate and productive human-robot interactions in production. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), Berlin, 2023, pp. 166–171, doi.org/10.1109/ARSO56563.2023.10187520 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  17. [17] Spitzhirn, M.; Benter, M.; Heindl, C. et al.: Hybrid work systems – platform-based work planning – designing productive and human-centered work processes. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 76 (2022), S. 489–509, doi.org/10.1007/s41449–022–00342–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  18. [18] Spitzhirn, M.; Liedtke, M.; Grün, G. et al.: Simulation of work environment factors for human-oriented and efficient workplaces. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 76 (2022), S. 416–439, doi.org/10.1007/s41449–022–00337–3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  19. [19] Daub, U.; Ackermann, A.; Kopp, V.: Ergonomie-Benefits: Kriterien zur Bewertung ergonomischer Maßnahmen in der Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IPA 2019, doi.org/10.24406/ipa-n-559153 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  20. [20] Schaub K.; Mühlstedt, J.; Illmann, B. et al.: Ergonomic assessment of automotive assembly tasks with digital human modelling and the ergonomics assessment worksheet‘ (EAWS). International Journal of Human Factors Modelling and Simulation 3 (2012) 3/4, dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHFMS.2012.051581 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  21. [21] DIN EN ISO 14738:2009–07: Sicherheit von Maschinen – Anthropometrische Anforderungen an die Gestaltung von Maschinenarbeitsplätzen. Ausgabe Juli 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  22. [22] DIN 33402–2: Ergonomie – Körpermaße des Menschen – Teil 2: Werte. Berlin: Beuth Verlag 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  23. [23] Wakula, J.; Berg, K.; Schaub, K. et al.: Der montagespezifische Kraftatlas. BGIA-Report 3/2009. Sankt Augustin: BGIA 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  24. [24] Kapandji, I. A.: Funktionelle Anatomie: schematisierte und kommentierte Zeichnungen zur menschlichen Biomechanik. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  25. [25] Spitzhirn, M.: Integration altersbedingter Veränderung der Beweglichkeit zur altersgerechten Arbeitsprozessgestaltung in digitalen Menschmodellen. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. (Hrsg.): Soziotechnische Gestaltung des digitalen Wandels, 63. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft. Dortmund: GfA-Press 2017, Beitrag C.1.7, S. 1–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  26. [26] HVBG (Hrsg.): Leitfaden für die Beurteilung von hebe- und Tragetätigkeiten. Gesundheitsgefährdung, gesetzliche Regelungen, Messmethoden, Beurteilungskriterien und Beurteilungsverfahren. Stand: 1995. Internet: www.dguv.de/projektdatenbank/ffff0119/pr9119.pdf. Zugriff am 27.01.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  27. [27] Nimbarte, A. D.; Chowdhury, S. K.; Moore, C. W.: Effects of lift-assist device on trunk and shoulder kinematics. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health 5 (2017) 1, pp. 1–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  28. [28] Fritzsche, L.; Hölzel, C.; Spitzhirn, M.: Weiterentwicklung der Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertung für Ergonomiemaßnahmen anhand von Praxisbeispielen der Automobilindustrie. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft (Hrsg.): Arbeit interdisziplinär – analysieren, bewerten, gestalten. Dortmund: GfA-Press 2019, Beitrag A.7.2, S. 1–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  29. [29] Kaltenbrunner, S.; Spillner, R.: Untersuchungen zur Akzeptanz von Handhabungsgeräten. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 108 (2013) 4, S. 244–248 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  30. [30] Shojaei, I.; Vazirian, M.; Croft, E. et al.: Age related differences in mechanical demands imposed on the lower back by manual material handling tasks. Journal of Biomechanics 49 (2016) 6, pp. 896–903 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  31. [31] ASTM: New Standard for Use of Exoskeletons for Return-to-Work. Stand: 2024. Internet: sn.astm.org/update/exoskeletons-return-to-work.html. Zugriff am 27.01.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-5
  32. [1] Bitkom Research: Rekord-Fachkräftemangel: In Deutschland sind 149.000 IT-Jobs unbesetzt. Stand: 2023. Internet: www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/Rekord-Fachkraeftemangel-Deutschland-IT-Jobs-unbesetzt/. Zugriff am 14.03.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  33. [2] Mueller, K.: Komplexität beherrschen: Modellbasierte Softwareentwicklung von Enterprise Software. mgm technology partners GmbH. Stand: 2023. Internet: insights.mgm-tp.com/de/komplexitaet-beherrschen-modellbasierte-softwareentwicklung-von-enterprise-software/. Zugriff am 14.03.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  34. [3] IBM: Was ist Low-Code? Stand: 2024. Internet: www.ibm.com/de-de/topics/low-code. Zugriff am 14.03.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  35. [4] Adrian, B.; Hinrichsen, S.; Schulz, A. et al.: Low-Code-Programmierung als Ansatz zur Gestaltung bedarfsgerechter informatorischer Assistenzsysteme – eine Fallstudie. In: Bornewasser, M.; Hinrichsen, S. (Hrsg.): Informatorische Assistenzsysteme in der variantenreichen Montage. Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg, 2020, S. 173–186 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  36. [5] Sauer, S.; Weidmann, N.; Kirchhoff, J.: Merkmale und Entwicklungslinien der Low-Code-Programmierung. In: Hinrichsen, S.; Sauer, S.; Schröder, K. (Hrsg.): Prozesse in Industriebetrieben mittels Low-Code-Software digitalisieren. Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg 2023, S. 17–29 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  37. [6] Vial, G.: Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28 (2019) 2, pp. 118–144 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  38. [7] Kagermann, H.; Wahlster, W.; Helbig, J.: Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0. Stand: 2013. Internet: www.acatech.de/publikation/umsetzungsempfehlungen-fuer-das-zukunftsprojekt-industrie-4–0-abschlussbericht-des-arbeitskreises-industrie-4–0/download-pdf?lang=de. Zugriff am 14.03.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  39. [8] Gartner: Forecast Analysis: Low-Code Development Technologies. Stand: 2021. Internet: www.gartner.com/en/documents/3995846. Zugriff am 14.03.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  40. [9] Fuerst, S.; Sanchez-Dominguez, O.; Rodriguez-Montes, M. A.: The Role of Digital Technology within the Business Model of Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Sustainability 15 (2023) 14, #10923 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  41. [10] Ulich, E.: Arbeitssysteme als Soziotechnische Systeme – eine Erinnerung. Journal Psychologie des Alltagshandelns 6 (2013) 1, S. 4–12 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  42. [11] Hirsch-Kreinsen, H.; Ittermann, P.: Digitalization of Work Processes: A Framework for Human-Oriented Work Design. In: McMurray, A.; Muenjohn, N.; Weerakoon, C. (Hrsg): The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Innovation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, pp. 273–293 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  43. [12] Hanelt, A.; Bohnsack, R.; Marz, D. et al.: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. Journal of Management Studies 58 (2021) 5, pp. 1159–1197 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  44. [13] Bresciani, S.; Ferraris, A.; Romano, M. et al.: Digital Transformation Management for Agile Organizations: A Compass to Sail the Digital World. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  45. [14] Kraus, S.; Ferraris, A.; Bertello, A.: The future of work: How innovation and digitalization re-shape the workplace. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 8 (2023) 4, #100438 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  46. [15] Myers; Klein: A Set of Principles for Conducting Critical Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 35 (2011) 1, pp. 17–36 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  47. [16] Ullrich, A.; Reißig, M.; Niehoff, S. et al.: Employee involvement and participation in digital transformation: a combined analysis of literature and practitioners‘ expertise. Journal of Organizational Change Management 36 (2023) 8, pp. 29–48 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  48. [17] Calderon-Monge, E.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D.: The role of digitalization in business and management: a systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science 18 (2024) 2, pp. 449–491 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  49. [18] PRISMA: PRISMA statement. Stand: 2024. Internet: www.prisma-statement.org/. Zugriff am 14.03.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  50. [19] Avishahar-Zeira, A.; Lorenz, D. H.: Could No-Code Be Code? Toward a No-Code Programming Language for Citizen Developers. Onward! 2023 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software, Cascais, Portugal, 2023, pp. 103–119 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  51. [20] Sanchis, R.; García-Perales, Ó.; Fraile, F. et al.: Low-Code as Enabler of Digital Transformation in Manufacturing Industry. Applied Sciences 10 (2020) 1, #12 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  52. [21] Guevara, I.; Chaudhary, H. A. A.; Margaria, T.: Model-Driven Edge Analytics: Practical Use Cases in Smart Manufacturing. International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, 2022, pp. 406–421 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  53. [22] Gomes, P. M.; Brito, M. A.: Low-Code Development Platforms: A Descriptive Study. 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Madrid, Spain, 2022, pp. 1–4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  54. [23] Sahay, A.; Di Ruscio, D.; Pierantonio, A.: Understanding the role of model transformation compositions in low-code development platforms. MODELS ‘20: ACM/IEEE 23rd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Virtual Event Canada, 2020, pp. 1–5 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  55. [24] Schneid, K.; Stapper, L.; Thone, S. et al.: Automated Regression Tests: A No-Code Approach for BPMN-based Process-Driven Applications. 2021 IEEE 25th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), Gold Coast, Australia, 2021, pp. 31–40 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  56. [25] Käss, S.; Strahringer, S.; Westner, M.: A Multiple Mini Case Study on the Adoption of Low Code Development Platforms in Work Systems. IEEE Access 11 (2023), pp. 118762–118786 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  57. [26] Wang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, M. et al.: The Necessity of Low-code Engineering for Industrial Software Development: A Case Study and Reflections. 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW), Wuhan, China, 2021, pp. 415–420 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  58. [27] Redchuk, A.; Walas Mateo, F.: New Business Models on Artificial Intelligence—The Case of the Optimization of a Blast Furnace in the Steel Industry by a Machine Learning Solution. Applied System Innovation 5 (2022) 1, p. 6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  59. [28] Lin, C.; Jia, C.; Han, G. et al.: A Low-Code Edge Computing-Based Predicting Scheme for Aeroengine Components to Enable Intelligent Aeronautical Manufacture. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics 5 (2024) 2, pp. 745–752 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  60. [29] El Kamouchi, H.; Kissi, M.; El Beggar, O.: Low-code/No-code Development: A systematic literature review. 14th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA), Casablanca, Morocco, 2023, pp. 1–8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  61. [30] Redchuk, A.; Walas Mateo, F.; Pascal, G. et al.: Adoption Case of IIoT and Machine Learning to Improve Energy Consumption at a Process Manufacturing Firm, under Industry 5.0 Model. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 7 (2023) 1, #42 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  62. [31] Horváth, B.; Horváth, Á.; Wimmer, M.: Towards the next generation of reactive model transformations on low-code platforms. MODELS ‘20: ACM/IEEE 23rd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Virtual Event Canada, 2020, pp. 1–10 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  63. [32] Bexiga, M.; Garbatov, S.; Seco, J. C.: Closing the gap between designers and developers in a low code ecosystem. MODELS ‘20: ACM/IEEE 23rd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Virtual Event Canada, 2020, pp. 1–10 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  64. [33] Qu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, X. et al.: Contract-Based Design for Low-Code Development in Industrial Edge Applications. 2023 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Helsinki, Finland, 2023, pp. 1–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  65. [34] Das, P.; Srivastava, S.; Moskovich, V. et al.: CDI-E. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 15 (2022) 12, pp. 3319–3331 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  66. [35] Ren, H.; Dorofeev, K.; Anicic, D. et al.: SeLoC-ML: Semantic Low-Code Engineering for Machine Learning Applications in Industrial IoT. In: Sattler, U.; Hogan, A.; Keet, M. et al. (Hrsg.): The Semantic Web – ISWC 2022. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2022, pp. 845–862 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  67. [36] Halim, J.; Eichler, P.; Krusche, S. et al.: No-code robotic programming for agile production: A new markerless-approach for multimodal natural interaction in a human-robot collaboration context. Frontiers in robotics and AI 9 (2022), #1001955 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  68. [37] Waszkowski, R.: Low-code platform for automating business processes in manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (2019) 10, pp. 376–381 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  69. [38] Deshmukh, R. A.; Jayakody, D.; Schneider, A. et al.: Data Spine: A Federated Interoperability Enabler for Heterogeneous IoT Platform Ecosystems. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 21 (2021) 12, #4010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  70. [39] Dalibor, M.; Heithoff, M.; Michael, J. et al.: Generating customized low-code development platforms for digital twins. Journal of Computer Languages 70 (2022), #101117 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  71. [40] Chaudhary, H. A. A.; Guevara, I.; Singh, A. et al.: Efficient Model-Driven Prototyping for Edge Analytics. Electronics 12 (2023) 18, #3881 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  72. [41] Overeem, M.; Jansen, S.: Proposing a Framework for Impact Analysis for Low-Code Development Platforms. 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), Fukuoka, Japan, 2021, pp. 88–97 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  73. [42] Klarhorst, C.; Quirin, D.; Hesse, M. et al.: ML4ProFlow: A Framework for Low-Code Data Processing from Edge to Cloud in Industrial Production. 2022 IEEE 27th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Stuttgart, 2022, pp. 1–4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  74. [43] Phalake, V. S.; Joshi, S. D.; Rade, K. A. et al.: Optimization for achieving sustainability in low code development platform. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 18 (2024) 8, pp. 5717–5724 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  75. [44] Biyalou-Sama, A.: Simplify model design in MDE approaches. MODELS ‚22: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion (2022), pp. 170 – 175 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-14
  76. [1] Sjarov, M.; Lechler, T.; Fuchs, J. et al.: The Digital Twin Concept in Industry – A Review and Systematization. 2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Vienna, Austria, 2020, pp. 1789–1796 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  77. [2] Hermann, M.; Pentek, T.; Otto, B.: Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 2016, pp. 3928–3937 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  78. [3] Bergs, T.; Gierlings, S.; Auerbach, T. et al.: The Concept of Digital Twin and Digital Shadow in Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 101 (2021) 3, pp. 81–84 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  79. [4] ISO 23247: Automation systems and Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing. Englische Fassung, Ausgabe Oktober 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  80. [5] Zimmermann, P.; Gerber, K.; Seyler, J. R.: A Concept for Selecting Suitable Resources in Automated Assembly Systems. 2021 IEEE 26th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Vasteras, Sweden, 2021, pp. 1–8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  81. [6] DIN SPEC 91345: Referenzarchitekturmodell Industrie 4.0 (RAMI4.0). Deutsche Fassung, Ausgabe April 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  82. [7] Xu, W.; Cui, J.; Li, L. et al.: Digital twin-based industrial cloud robotics: Framework, control approach and implementation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 58, Part B (2021), pp. 196–209 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  83. [8] Saavedra Sueldo, C.; Perez Colo, I.; Paula, M. de et al.: ROS-based architecture for fast digital twin development of smart manufacturing robotized systems. Annals of Operations Research 322 (2023) 1, pp. 75–99 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  84. [9] Tantik, E.; Anderl, R.: Integrated Data Model and Structure for the Asset Administration Shell in Industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP 60 (2017) 10, pp. 86–91 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  85. [10] Walter, J.; Grau, S.; Raczok, T. et al.: Bringing the new class of cable-driven parallel robots to the world of industrial cyber-physical systems based on RAMI 4.0. 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), Coventry, United Kingdom, 2022, pp. 1–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  86. [11] Inigo, M. A.; Porto, A.; Kremer, B. et al.: Towards an Asset Administration Shell scenario: a use case for interoperability and standardization in Industry 4.0. NOMS 2020–2020 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, Budapest, Hungary, 2020, pp. 1–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  87. [12] Ye, X.; Hong, S. H.; Song, W. S. et al.: An Industry 4.0 Asset Administration Shell-Enabled Digital Solution for Robot-Based Manufacturing Systems. IEEE Access 9 (2021), pp. 154448–154459 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  88. [13] IDTA: Specification of the Asset Administration Shell. Part 1: Metamodel. Internet: industrialdigitaltwin.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/IDTA-01001–3–0–1_SpecificationAssetAdministrationShell_Part1_Metamodel.pdf. Zugriff am 11.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  89. [14] IDTA: Specification of the Asset Administration Shell. Part 3a: Data Specification – IEC 61360. Internet: industrialdigitaltwin.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/IDTA-01003-a-3–0–2_SpecificationAssetAdministrationShell_Part3a_DataSpecification_IEC613601.pdf. Zugriff am 11.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  90. [15] ECLASS: ECLASS 14.0. Internet: eclass.eu/eclass-standard/content-suche. Zugriff am 11.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  91. [16] IDTA: Digital Nameplate for Industrial Equipment. Internet: industrialdigitaltwin.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IDTA-02006–3–0_Submodel_Digital-Nameplate.pdf. Zugriff am 11.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  92. [17] IDTA: Generic Frame for Technical Data for Industrial Equipment in Manufacturing. Internet: industrialdigitaltwin.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/IDTA-02003–1–2_Submodel_TechnicalData.pdf. Zugriff am 11.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  93. [18] IDTA: Time Series Data. Internet: industrialdigitaltwin.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/IDTA-02008–1–1_Submodel_TimeSeriesData.pdf. Zugriff am 11.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  94. [19] IDTA: Specification of the Asset Administration Shell. Part 2: Application Programming Interfaces. Internet: /industrialdigitaltwin.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IDTA-01002–3–0–3_SpecificationAssetAdministrationShell_Part2_API.pdf. Zugriff am 11.02.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-23
  95. [1] Miehe, R. et al.: Enabling bidirectional real time interaction between biological and technical systems: Structural basics of a control oriented modeling of biology-technology-interfaces. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 81, 2019, pp. 63–68 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  96. [2] Bergs, T. et al.: Application cases of biological transformation in manufacturing technology. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 31, 2020, pp. 68–77 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  97. [3] Hellmich, A. et al.: Bio-inspired factories of the future. Hannover, Proceedings of the Conference on Production Systems and Logistics: CPSL 2020, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  98. [4] European Commission, The European Green Deal,” Communication, European Commission, Bruessels COM(2019) 640 fina, 2019. Internet: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en. Zugriff am 9. Juli 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  99. [5] European Commission, Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR): Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for sustainable products, amending Directive (EU) 2020/1828 and Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC. Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1781/oj. Zugriff am 11. Juli 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  100. [6] Berkhahn, M. et al.: Taxonomy for Biological Transformation Principles in the Manufacturing Industry. In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing Driving Circular Economy, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 981–989 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  101. [7] Neugebauer, R.: Biologische Transformation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  102. [8] Miehe, R. et al.: The biological transformation of industrial manufacturing: Technologies, status and scenarios for a sustainable future of the German manufacturing industry. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 54, 2020, pp. 50–61 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  103. [9] Bauernhansl, T.; Brecher, C.; Drossel, W.: Biointelligenz: eine neue Perspektive für nachhaltige industrielle Wertschöpfung: Ergebnisse der Voruntersuchung zur biologischen Transformation der industriellen Wertschöpfung (Biotrain). Vol. 2019, http://publica.fraunhofer.de/ eprints/urn_nbn_de_0011-n-5412052.pdf, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  104. [10] Byrne, G. et al.: Biologicalisation: Biological transformation in manufacturing, 2018, pp. 1–43 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  105. [11] Drossel, W.; Dani, I.; and Wertheim, R.: Biological transformation and technologies used for manufacturing of multifunctional metal-based parts. Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 33, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s2351978919304937, 2019, pp. 115–122 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  106. [12] Seegrün, A.; Mügge, J.; Riedelsheimer, T.; and Lindow, K.: Digital Twins for Sustainability in the Context of Biological Transformation. In: Manufacturing Driving Circular Economy: Proceedings of the 18th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, October 5-7, 2022, Berlin, 2023, pp. 576–584 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  107. [13] Miehe, R.; Horbelt, J.; Baumgarten, Y.; and Bauernhansl, T.: Basic considerations for a digital twin of biointelligent systems: Applying technical design patterns to biological systems, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 31, 2020, pp. 548–560 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  108. [14] Fraunhofer IPK, BioFusion 4.0: Integration biologischer Prinzipien in die Industrie 4.0. [Online] https://www.ipk.fraunhofer.de/de/zusammenarbeit/referenzen/biofusion40.html. Zugriff am 13. Aug. 2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  109. [15] Riedelsheimer, T.; Seegrün, A.; Lindow, K.: Digital Twins for real-time Life Cycle Assessment of Products, Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, to be published 2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  110. [16] Negri, E.; Fumagalli, L.; Macchi, M.: A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production Systems,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 11, 2017, pp. 939–948 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  111. [17] Plattform Industrie 4.0, Details on the Asset Administration Shell (AAS): Specification. Internet: https://www.plattform-i40.de/IP/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Publikation/Details_of_the_Asset_Administration_Shell_Part1_V2.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=6. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  112. [18] Eclipse Foundation, BaSyx. Internet: https://wiki.eclipse.org/ BaSyx. Zugriff am 11. Juli 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  113. [19] Stark, R.; Damerau, T.: Digital Twin. In: CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2019, pp. 1–8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  114. [20] Mügge, J.; Hahn, I. R.; Riedelsheimer, T.; and Chatzis, J.: Digital Twins for Circular Economy - Enabling Decision Support for R-Strategies, I40M, No. 6, 2022, pp. 42–46 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  115. [21] Seegrün, A. et al.: Sustainable product lifecycle management with Digital Twins: A systematic literature review, Procedia CIRP, vol. 119, 2023, pp. 776–781 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  116. [22] DIN ISO. DIN EN ISO 14040:2006 Umweltmanagement – Ökobilanz – Grundsätze und Rahmenbedingungen,” DIN-Norm, Berlin DIN EN ISO 14040:2009-11, 2006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  117. [23] DIN EN ISO 14044:2006, 14044, 2006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-30
  118. [1] Berger, J.; Schumacher, S.; Mehrer, J. et al.: User-centered analysis for the implementation of industrial mobile robots. Procedia CIRP 126 (2024), pp. 224–229 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  119. [2] Berger, J.; Lu, S.: A Multi-camera System for Human Detection and Activity Recognition. Procedia CIRP 112 (2022), pp. 191–196 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  120. [3] Ghodsian, N.; Benfriha, K.; Olabi, A. et al.: Toward designing an integration architecture for a mobile manipulator in production systems: Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 109 (2022), pp. 443–448 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  121. [4] Rothmeyer, F.; Spitzer, F.; Herrmann, S. et al.: Akustische Basissignale für mobile Logistik-Roboter. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 119 (2024) 10, S. 728–734 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  122. [5] Berg, J.; Lottermoser, A.; Richter, C. et al.: Human-Robot-Interaction for mobile industrial robot teams. Procedia CIRP 79 (2019), pp. 614–619 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  123. [6] Berger, J.; Colceriu, C.; Blank, A. et al.: Abschlussbericht: FORobotics – mobile ad-hoc kooperierende Roboterteams. Augsburg: Universität Augsburg/Fraunhofer IGCV 2021, doi.org/10.24406/igcv-n-624794 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  124. [7] Niemann, F.; Reining, C.; Moya Rueda, F. et al.: LARa: Creating a Dataset for Human Activity Recognition in Logistics Using Semantic Attributes. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 20 (2020) 15, #4083, doi.org/10.3390/s20154083 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  125. [8] Wang, L.; Huang, B.; Zhao, Z. et al.: VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Masking. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 14549–14560 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  126. [9] Kolensnikov, A.; Dosovitskiy, A.; Weissenborn, D. et al.: An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021, Arxiv, doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  127. [10] Feichtenhofer, C.: X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 203–213 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  128. [11] Materzynska, J.; Berger, G.; Bax, I. et al.: The Jester Dataset: A Large-Scale Video Dataset of Human Gestures. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop, 2019, pp. 2874–2882 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-38
  129. [1] Orson, B.: Sustainable Cabin Design. New Approaches in Sustainable Aircraft Interior Design. Aerospace Technology Institute – FlyZero. Stand: 2022. Internet: www.ati.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/FZO-AIR-POS-0039-Sustainable-Cabin-Design.pdf. Zugriff am 04.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  130. [2] Beyerer, J.; Puente León, F.; Frese, C. et al. (Hrsg.): Automatische Sichtprüfung. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  131. [3] Halbach, G.; Oechsner, U.: Smart Line Scan Measurement Systems. PhotonicsViews 17 (2020) 6, pp. 50–53 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  132. [4] Beyerer, J.; Puente León, F.; Frese, C. et al.: Sensoren zur Bildgewinnung. In: Beyerer, J.; Puente León, F.; Frese, C. et al. (Hrsg.): Automatische Sichtprüfung. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2024, S. 255–284 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  133. [5] Forgács, Z.; Trohák, A.: The determination of the line of interest in a line scan camera-based measurement system. Pollack Periodica (2024), doi.org/10.1556/606.2024.01187 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  134. [6] Zhang, Z.: A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22 (2000) 11, pp. 1330–1334 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  135. [7] Shang, H.; Liu, C.; Wang, R.: Measurement methods of 3D shape of large-scale complex surfaces based on computer vision: A review. Measurement 197 (2022), #111302, doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111302 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  136. [8] Ramm, R.; Heinze, M.; Kühmstedt, P. et al.: Portable solution for high-resolution 3D and color texture on-site digitization of cultural heritage objects. Journal of Cultural Heritage 53 (2022), pp. 165–175 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  137. [9] Beyerer, J.; Puente León, F.; Frese, C. et al.: Vorverarbeitung und Bildverbesserung. In: Beyerer, J.; Puente León, F.; Frese, C. et al. (Hrsg.): Automatische Sichtprüfung. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2024, S. 639–708 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  138. [10] Valente, J.; Soatto, S.: Perspective distortion modeling, learning and compensation. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Boston, MA, USA, 2015, pp. 9–16 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  139. [11] Vasluianu, F.-A.; Seizinger, T.; Zhou, Z. et al.: NTIRE 2024 Image Shadow Removal Challenge Report. 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Seattle, WA, USA, 2024, pp. 6547–6570 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  140. [12] Ramola, A.; Shakya, A. K.; van Pham, D.: Study of statistical methods for texture analysis and their modern evolutions. Engineering Reports 2 (2020) 4, doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12149 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  141. [13] Hoseini, E.; Farhadi, F.; Tajeripour, F.: Fabric Defect Detection Using Auto-Correlation Function. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering (2013), pp. 114–117 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  142. [14] Luo, Q.; Fang, X.; Su, J. et al.: Automated Visual Defect Classification for Flat Steel Surface: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 69 (2020) 12, pp. 9329–9349 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  143. [15] Jocher, G.; Jing, Q.; Chaurasia, A.: Ultralytics YOLO (Version 8.0.0). Internet: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics. Zugriff am 04.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  144. [16] Selamet, F.; Cakar, S.; Kotan, M.: Automatic Detection and Classification of Defective Areas on Metal Parts by Using Adaptive Fusion of Faster R-CNN and Shape From Shading. IEEE Access 10 (2022), pp. 126030–126038, doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3224037 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  145. [17] Mittal, A.; Moorthy, A. K.; Bovik, A. C.: No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE transactions on image processing 21 (2012) 12, pp. 4695–4708, doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  146. [18] Deng, J.; Dong, W.; Socher, R. et al.: ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPR Workshops), Miami, FL, 2009, pp. 248–255 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  147. [19] Ultralytics Inc.: Modelltraining mit Ultralytics YOLO. Stand: 2024. Internet: docs.ultralytics.com/de/modes/train/. Zugriff am 04.02.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  148. [20] Lin, T.-Y.; Maire, M.; Belongie, S. et al.: Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. In: Fleet, D.; Pajdla, T.; Schiele, B. et al. (Hrsg.): Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2014, pp. 740–755, doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–10602–1_48 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-46
  149. [1] Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V.: Die Elektromobilität weltweit auf dem Vormarsch. 14,5 Millionen E-Autos weltweit abgesetzt. Deutschland hinter China und den USA drittgrößter Elektro-Pkw-Markt weltweit. Internet: www.vda.de/de/themen/elektromobilitaet/marktentwicklung-europa-international. Zugriff am 06.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  150. [2] Kagermann, H.: Geleitwort. In: Korthauer, R. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Lithium-Ionen-Batterien. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2013, S. V–VI Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  151. [3] Kampker, A.: Die Produktion des Hochvolt-Speichersystems. In: Kampker, A. (Hrsg.): Elektromobilproduktion. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2014, S. 43–113 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  152. [4] Kurzweil, P.; Dietlmeier, O. K. (Hrsg.): Elektrochemische Speicher. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  153. [5] Börner, M. F.: Ein prozessbasiertes Modell zur Berechnung der Kosten von Lithium-Ionen-Batteriezellen. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  154. [6] Frieske, B.; Stieler, S.: Themenpapier Cluster Elektromobilität Süd-West: Die Produktionskette „Batteriesystem“ und kritische Ressourcen. Stuttgart. Stand: 2022. Internet: www.transformationswissen-bw.de/fileadmin/media/Publikationen/e-mobil_Studien/Themenpapier_Cluster_ESW_Produktionskette_Batteriesystem_und_kritische_Ressourcen.pdf. Zugriff am 06.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  155. [7] Thielmann, A.; Wietschel, M.; Funke, S. e. a.: Batterien für Elektroautos: Faktencheck und Handlungsbedarf. Sind Batterien für Elektroautos der Schlüssel für eine nachhaltige Mobilität der Zukunft? Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  156. [8] ZVEI e.V.: Steigender Import von Batterien: Lithium-Ionen-Zellen und -Batterien dominieren. Stand: 2023. Internet: www.zvei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Presse_und_Medien/Publikationen/2023/Mai/Faktenblatt_Import/Faktenblatt_Import_End.pdf. Zugriff am 07.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  157. [9] Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz (BMWK) (Hrsg.): Batteriezellförderung – ein Beispiel erfolgreich transformativer Industriepolitik. Stand: 2022. Internet: www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Energie/batteriezellforderung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1. Zugriff am 07.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  158. [10] VDE (Hrsg.):-Positionspapier: Batteriezellfertigung für die Elektromobilität in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main: VDE e.V. 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  159. [11] Dahmen, C.; Degen, F.; Eckstein, M. C. et al.: Whitepaper: Mastering Ramp-up of Battery Production. Stand: 2024. Internet: www.ffb.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ipt/forschungsfertigung-batteriezelle/Bilder/presse-medien/whitepaper-ramp-up/Whitepaper_Mastering%20Ramp-up%20of%20Battery%20Production.pdf. Zugriff am 06.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  160. [12] Michaelis, S.; Schütrumpf, J.; Kampker, A. et al.: Batterie-Produktionsmittel Roadmap 2030. Update 2023. Frankfurt am Main: VDMA-Verlag 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  161. [13] Lodwig, R.; Schulz, F.: Datenerhebung in der Batteriezellenproduktion. wt Werkstattstechnik online 113 (2023) 3, S. 81–86. Internet: www.werkstattstechnik.de. Düsseldorf: VDI Fachmedien Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  162. [14] acp systems AG: Innovative Wickelmaschine für zylindrische Batteriezellen. Internet: batterie-produktion.de/batterieproduktion/innovative-wickelmaschine-fuer-zylindrische-batteriezellen/. Zugriff am 06.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  163. [15] PEM der RWTH Aachen; VDMA (Hrsg.): Produktionsprozess einer Lithium-Ionen-Battereizelle. Frankfurt am Main: Eigendruck PEM der RWTH Aachen & VDMA 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  164. [16] Pettinger, K.-H.: Fertigungsprozesse von Lithium-Ionen-Zellen. In: Korthauer, R. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Lithium-Ionen-Batterien. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2013, S. 221–235 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  165. [17] Baazouzi, S.; Feistel, N.; Wanner, J. et al.: Design, Properties, and Manufacturing of Cylindrical Li-Ion Battery Cells—A Generic Overview. Batteries 9 (2023) 6, p. 309 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  166. [18] Wöhrle, T.: Lithium-Ionen-Zelle. In: Korthauer, R. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Lithium-Ionen-Batterien. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2013, S. 107–117 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  167. [19] Carter, R.; Klein, E. J.; Atkinson, R. W. et al.: Mechanical collapse as primary degradation mode in mandrel-free 18650 Li-ion cells operated at 0 °C. Journal of Power Sources 437 (2019), #226820 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  168. [20] Sigma-Aldrich: Safety Data Sheet. Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, electrode sheet,aluminium substrate. Steinheim: Sigma Aldrich 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  169. [21] VDMA 4001-2: OPC UA for Machinery - Part 2: Process Values. Stand: 2023. Internet: attachments.vdma.org/attachments/Fqv4xdiemRfhRsU5Fjug. Zugriff am 07.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  170. [22] Rietdorf, C.; Torolsan, K.; Favier, M. et al.: Leveraging Digital Twins for Real-Time Environmental Monitoring in Battery Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 130 (2024), pp. 749–754 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  171. [23] Anderlik, S.; Kößler, F.; Sawodny, J. et al.: Dashboards in der Batteriezellfertigung. wt Werkstattstechnik online 114 (2024) 7/8, S. 439–444. Internet: www.werkstattstechnik.de. Düsseldorf: VDI Fachmedien Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  172. [24] Öttinger, M. (Hrsg.): Die EU- Batterieverordnung. Neue Pflichten für Akteure der Batteriewirtschaft. Berlin: Beuth Verlag 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-54
  173. [1] Ahlborn, H.; Bezerra, R.; Middendorf, P. et al.: PulForm – Manufacturing of complex parts by combination of braiding, pultrusion and blowmoulding. Stuttgart: Institut für Kunststofftechnik 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  174. [2] Volk, M.; Yuksel, O.; Baran, I. et al.: Cost-efficient, automated, and sustainable composite profile manufacture: A review of the state of the art, innovations, and future of pultrusion technologies. Composites Part B: Engineering 246 (2022) #110135 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  175. [3] Wilhelm, F.; Wedel, A.; Wilfert, J. et al.: Prozessdigitalisierung von Bestandsanlagen. Intelligente Prozessdigitalisierung am Beispiel des Fertigungsverfahrens Pultrusion. wt Werkstattstechnik 112 (2022) 3, S. 154–160. Internet: www.werkstattstechnik.de. Düsseldorf: VDI Fachmedien Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  176. [4] Canevarolo, S. V. J.; Gasparini, T. M.; Costa, L. C. et al.: Apparatus for in-line optical detection of low-angle laser light scattering (lalls), use of same and method for real-time morphological monitoring of polyphase systems. Patent WO2017136910 vom 10.02.2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  177. [5] Xian Jiaotong University: Continuous fiber 3D printing process monitoring method based on artificial intelligence image recognition. Patent CN115457476A vom 09.12.2022 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  178. [6] Talabi, S. I.; Tobin, J.; Strom, B. et al.: Recent and future developments in pultrusion technology with consideration for curved geometries: A review. Composites Part B: Engineering 283 (2024), # 111678, S. 13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  179. [7] DIN EN 13706–2:2002. Verstärkte Kunststoffverbundwerkstoffe – Spezifikationen für pultrudierte Profile – Teil 2. Deutsche Fassung, Ausgabe Oktober 2002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  180. [8] Taudt, C.; Leyens, C.; Hartmann, P. et al.: Darkfield-scattering surface analysis in powder-based AM-processes: analysis of a multi-wavelength approach. Conference LA401: Laser 3D Manufacturing XIII, San Francisco/California USA, 2025, Paper 13354–16 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  181. [9] Baran, I.: Pultrusion: State-of-the-art Process Models. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-60
  182. [1] Reinhart, G.: Handbuch Industrie 4.0. Geschäftsmodelle, Prozesse, Technik. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  183. [2] Wiendahl, H.-P.; Wiendahl, H.-H.: Betriebsorganisation für Ingenieure. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  184. [3] DIN EN ISO 10218–1: Robotik – Sicherheitsanforderungen – Teil 1: Industrieroboter (ISO/DIS 10218–1.2:2021), Ausgabe September 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  185. [4] Hesse, S.; Malisa, V. (Hrsg.): Taschenbuch Robotik, Montage, Handhabung. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  186. [5] Lynch, K. M.; Park, F. C.: Modern robotics – mechanics, planning, and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  187. [6] Yang, L.; Qi, J.; Song, D. et al.: Survey of Robot 3D Path Planning Algorithms. Journal of Control Science and Engineering (2016), pp. 1–22, doi.org/10.1155/2016/7426913 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  188. [7] Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Yang, X. et al.: Path planning techniques for mobile robots: Review and prospect. Expert Systems with Applications 227 (2023), #120254 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  189. [8] Kroger, T.; Wahl, F. M.: Online Trajectory Generation: Basic Concepts for Instantaneous Reactions to Unforeseen Events. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 26 (2010) 1, pp. 94–111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  190. [9] Kavraki, L. E.; Svestka, P.; Latombe, J.-C. et al.: Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 12 (1996) 4, pp. 566–580 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  191. [10] Hart, P.; Nilsson, N.; Raphael, B.: A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4 (1968) 2, pp. 100–107 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  192. [11] Madridano, Á.; Al-Kaff, A.; Martín, D. et al.: 3D Trajectory Planning Method for UAVs Swarm in Building Emergencies. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 20 (2020) 3, #642, doi.org/10.3390/s20030642 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  193. [12] Steven M. LaValle: Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees: A New Tool for Path Planning. Stand:1998. Internet: lavalle.pl/papers/Lav98c.pdf. Zugriff am 04.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  194. [13] Shahabi, M.; Ghariblu, H.; Beschi, M.: Comparison of different sample-based motion planning methods in redundant robotic manipulators. Robotica 40 (2022) 9, pp. 3104–3119 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  195. [14] Khatib, O.: Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, MO, USA, 1985, pp. 500–505 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  196. [15] Liu, H.; Qu, D.; Xu, F. et al.: Real-Time and Efficient Collision Avoidance Planning Approach for Safe Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 105 (2022) 4, #93, doi.org/10.1007/s10846–022–01687–0 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  197. [16] Sutton, R. S.; Barto, A. G.: Reinforcement learning. An introduction. Cambridge/Massachusetts: The MIT Press 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  198. [17] Tan, C. S.; Mohd-Mokhtar, R.; Arshad, M. R.: A Comprehensive Review of Coverage Path Planning in Robotics Using Classical and Heuristic Algorithms. IEEE Access 9 (2021), pp. 119310–119342 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  199. [18] Raajan, J.; Srihari, P. V.; Satya, J. P. et al.: Real Time Path Planning of Robot using Deep Reinforcement Learning. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53 (2020) 2, pp. 15602–15607 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  200. [19] Chandler, B.; Goodrich, M. A.: Online RRT* and online FMT*: Rapid replanning with dynamic cost. 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2017, pp. 6313–6318 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  201. [20] Kurniawati, H.: Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes and Robotics. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems 5 (2022) 1, pp. 253–277 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  202. [21] Thumm, J.; Althoff, M.: Provably Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation in Human Environments. arXiv (2022), https://arxiv:2205.06311 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  203. [22] Vrabič, R.; Škulj, G.; Malus, A. et al.: An architecture for sim-to-real and real-to-sim experimentation in robotic systems. Procedia CIRP 104 (2021), pp. 336–341 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  204. [23] Collins, J.; Howard, D.; Leitner, J.: Quantifying the Reality Gap in Robotic Manipulation Tasks. 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2019, pp. 6706–6712 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  205. [24] Skalse, J.; Howe, N. H. R.; Krasheninnikov, D. et al.: Defining and Characterizing Reward Hacking. arXiv (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13085 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  206. [25] Cho, J.; Jung, S.: Reinforcement Learning-Based Motion Planning for Robotic Manipulators in Smart Industry. 2024 15th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2024, pp. 1166–1168 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  207. [26] Prasuna, R. G.; Potturu, S. R.: Deep reinforcement learning in mobile robotics – a concise review. Multimedia Tools and Applications 83 (2024) 28, pp. 70815–70836 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  208. [27] Quillen, D.; Jang, E.; Nachum, O. et al.: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Grasping: A Simulated Comparative Evaluation of Off-Policy Methods. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, QLD, 2018, pp. 6284–6291 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  209. [28] Xie, J.; Shao, Z.; Li, Y. et al.: Deep Reinforcement Learning With Optimized Reward Functions for Robotic Trajectory Planning. IEEE Access 7 (2019), pp. 105669–105679 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  210. [29] Liu, H.; Ying, F.; Jiang, R. et al.: Obstacle-Avoidable Robotic Motion Planning Framework Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 29 (2024) 6, pp. 4377–4388 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  211. [30] Sangiovanni, B.; Incremona, G. P.; Piastra, M. et al.: Self-Configuring Robot Path Planning With Obstacle Avoidance via Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Control Systems Letters 5 (2021) 2, pp. 397–402 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  212. [31] Tang, C.; Abbatematteo, B.; Hu, J. et al.: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: A Survey of Real-World Successes. arXiv (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03539 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  213. [32] Tobin, J.; Fong, R.; Ray, A. et al.: Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real World. 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2017, pp. 23–30, doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2017.8202133 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-67
  214. [1] Schenk, M. (Hrsg.): Produktion und Logistik mit Zukunft. Digital Engineering and Operation. Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  215. [2] Westkämper, E.; Spath, D.; Constantinescu, C. et al: Digitale Produktion. Heidelberg: Springer 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  216. [3] Kletti, J.; Rieger, J.: Die perfekte Produktion. Manufacturing Excellence in der Smart Factory. Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg 2022 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  217. [4] Bauernhansl, T.; Fechter, M.; Dietz, T. (Hrsg.): Entwicklung, Aufbau und Demonstration einer wandlungsfähigen (Fahrzeug-) Forschungsproduktion. Berlin: Springer Vieweg 2020 (Arena2036) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  218. [5] Nordwig, K.; Kärcher S.; Bauernhansl T.: Steuerungsbedarfe im operativen Betrieb von Matrixproduktionssystemen. wt Werkstattstechnik online, 114 (2024) 9, S. 555–561. Internet: www.werkstattstechnik.de. Düsseldorf: VDI Fachmedien Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  219. [6] Wiendahl, H.-H.: Auftragsmanagement der industriellen Produktion: Grundlagen, Konfiguration, Einführung. Heidelberg: Springer 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  220. [7] Gottmann, J.: Produktionscontrolling: Wertströme und Kosten Optimieren. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  221. [8] Kempkes, J. A.; Suprano, F.; Wömpener, A.: Produktion 4.0 mit den richtigen Kennzahlen steuern. Controlling & Management Review 62 (2018) 4, S. 56–61 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  222. [9] Hofmann, C. C.: Vorausschauende und reaktive Mehrzieloptimierung für die Produktionssteuerung einer Matrixproduktion. Dissertation, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  223. [10] Müller, D.: Flexibilitätsorientierte Selbststeuerung. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dortmund, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  224. [11] Bochmann, L. S.: Entwicklung und Bewertung eines flexiblen und dezentral gesteuerten Fertigungssystems für variantenreiche Produkte. Dissertation, ETH Zürich, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  225. [12] Echsler Minguillon, F.: Prädiktiv-reaktives Scheduling zur Steigerung der Robustheit in der Matrix-Produktion. Dissertation, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  226. [13] Göppert, A.; Hüttemann, G.; Jung, S. et al.: Frei verkettete Montagesysteme. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 113 (2018) 3, S. 151–155 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  227. [14] Kletti, J.: MES – Manufacturing Execution System. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  228. [15] Gronau, N.; Kern, E.-M.; Jonitz, H.: Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Produktionsstörungen. Industrie 4.0 Management 35 (2019) 6, S. 33–36, doi.org/10.30844/I40M_19–6_S29–32 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  229. [16] Brackel, T. van: Adaptive Steuerung flexibler Werkstattfertigungssysteme: Nutzung moderner Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien zur effizienten Produktionssteuerung unter Echtzeitbedingungen. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  230. [17] Wagner, J.; Burggräf, P.; Bäumers, Y. et al.: Störungsrelevante Montageprozesse erkennen. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 110 (2015) 12, S. 787–790 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  231. [18] Siebel, T.: Matrixproduktion vereint Wirtschaftlichkeit und Flexibilität. Stand: 2022. Internet: www.springerprofessional.de/en/produktion-produktionstechnik/industrie-4–0/matrixproduktion-vereint-wirtschaftlichkeit-und-flexibilitaet/23281702. Zugriff am 31.01.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  232. [19] Forschungsbeirat der Plattform Industrie 4.0/acatech (Hrsg.): Umsetzung von cyber-physischen Matrixproduktionssystemen. Internet: www.acatech.de/publikation/umsetzung-von-cyber-physischen-matrixproduktionssystemen/. Zugriff am 31.01.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  233. [20] Wiendahl, H.-P.; Reichardt, J.; Nyhuis, P.: Handbuch Fabrikplanung: Konzept, Gestaltung und Umsetzung wandlungsfähiger Produktionsstätten. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  234. [21] De Toni, A.; Tonchia, S.: Manufacturing flexibility: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research 36 (1998) 6, pp. 1587–1617 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  235. [22] Zäh, M.F.; Moller, N.; Vogl, W.: Symbiosis of Changeable and Virtual Production – The Emperor’s New Clothes or Key Factor for Future Success?. In: Zäh, M. (Hrsg.): International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV 2005), München: Utz Verlag 2005, pp. 3–10 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  236. [23] Meyer, G.; Knüppel, K.; Schmidt, M. et al.: Störgrößenmanagement-Systematik. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 109 (10), S. 704– 707, doi.org/10.3139/104.111215 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  237. [24] Butollo, F.; Staritz, C.: Deglobalisierung, Rekonfiguration oder Business as Usual? COVID-19 und die Grenzen der Rückverlagerung globalisierter Produktion. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 32 (2022) 3, S. 393–425, doi.org/10.1007/s11609–022–00479–5 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  238. [25] Hirsch, A.; Regel, J.: Werkzeugmaschinen und Vorrichtungen. Anforderungen, Auslegung, Ausführungsbeispiele. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg 2022 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  239. [26] Ullrich, G.; Albrecht, T.: Die Welt des FTS. In: Ullrich, G.; Albrecht, T. (Hrsg.): Fahrerlose Transportsysteme. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg 2023, S. 1–32, doi.org/10.1007/978–3–658–38738–9_1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  240. [27] Martin, H.: Grundlagen Transportlogistik. In: Martin, H. (Hrsg.): Transport- und Lagerlogistik. Systematik, Planung, Einsatz und Wirtschaftlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg 2016, S. 99–133 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  241. [28] Kumar, V.; Verma, P.; Muthukumaar, V.: The Performances of Process Capability Indices in the Six-Sigma Competitiveness Levels. Proceedings 8th IEOM Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2018, Bandung, pp. 1945–1951 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  242. [29] Koether, R. (Hrsg.): Taschenbuch der Logistik. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  243. [30] Werner, S.; Kellner, M.; Schenk, E.: Just-in-sequence material supply—a simulation-based solution in electronics production. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 19 (2003) 1–2, pp. 107–111, doi.org/10.1016/S0736–5845(02)00067–4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  244. [31] Helmold, M.; Terry, B.: Operations and supply management 4.0. Industry insights, case studies and best practices. Cham: Springer-Verlag 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  245. [32] Sandengen, O. C.; Estensen, L. A.; Raoslash, H. et al.: High Performance Manufacturing – An Innovative Contribution towards Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation Conference, Manchester/UK, 2016, pp. 14–20 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  246. [33] Badura, B.; Ducki, A.; Baumgardt, J. et al.: Fehlzeiten-Report 2023. Zeitenwende – Arbeit gesund gestalten. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  247. [34] Schuler, H.: Zum Automatisierungsgrad von verfahrenstechnischen Prozessen. In: Chemie Ingenieur Technik 67 (1995) 5, S. 545–552, doi.org/10.1002/cite.330670503 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  248. [35] Clauer, D.; Fottner, J.; Rauch, E. et al.: Usage of Autonomous Mobile Robots Outdoors – an Axiomatic Design Approach. Procedia CIRP 96 (2021), pp. 242–247, doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.081 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-75
  249. [1] Westkämper, E.; Löffler, C.: Strategien der Produktion. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  250. [2] Fechter, M.; Dietz, T.: Bewertung der Wandlungsfähigkeit eines Produktionssystems. In: Bauernhansl, T.; Fechter, M.; Dietz, T. (Hrsg.): Entwicklung, Aufbau und Demonstration einer wandlungsfähigen (Fahrzeug-) Forschungsproduktion. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2020, S. 11–17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  251. [3] Meyer-Schwickerath, B.: Wandlungsfähigkeit von KMU erhöhen. wt Werkstattstechnik online 103 (2013) 7/8 Seite 624. Internet: www.werkstattstechnik.de. Düsseldorf: Springer-VDI-Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  252. [4] Westkämper, E.; Zahn, E.: Wandlungsfähige Produktionsunternehmen. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  253. [5] Wiendahl, H.-P.; Wiendahl Hans-Hermann: Betriebsorganisation für Ingenieure. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  254. [6] Götz, G.: Methode zur Steigerung der Formatflexibilität von Verpackungsmaschinen. Dissertation, Technische Universität München, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  255. [7] Andersen, A.-L.; Nielsen, K.; Brunoe, T. D. et al.: Understanding Changeability Enablers and Their Impact on Performance in Manufacturing Companies. In: Moon, I.; Lee, G. M.; Park, J. et al. (Hrsg.): Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management for Data-Driven, Intelligent, Collaborative, and Sustainable Manufacturing. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2018, pp. 297–304 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  256. [8] Nyhuis, P.; Reinhart, G.; Abele, E. (Hrsg.): Wandlungsfähige Produktionssysteme. Heute die Industrie von morgen gestalten. Garbsen: PZH Produktionstechnisches Zentrum 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  257. [9] Wiendahl, H.-P.; Noven, D.; Klußmann, J. H.: Planung modularer Fabriken. Vorgehen und Beispiele aus der Praxis. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  258. [10] Hernández Morales, R.: Systematik der Wandlungsfähigkeit in der Fabrikplanung. Dissertation, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 2002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  259. [11] Abele, E.; Reinhart, G.: Zukunft der Produktion. Herausforderungen, Forschungsfelder, Chancen. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  260. [12] Schuh, G.; Riesener, M.: Produktkomplexität managen. Strategien-Methoden-Tools. München: Carl Hanser Verlag 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  261. [13] Drabow, G.: Modulare Gestaltung und ganzheitliche Bewertung wandlungsfähiger Fertigungssysteme. Dissertation, Universität Hannover, 2006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  262. [14] Ullrich, A.: Eigenschaften wandlungsfähiger Systeme – Erarbeitung eines Indikatorsystems. Berlin: GITO Verlag 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  263. [15] Napoleone, A.; Pozzetti, A.; Macchi, M.: Core Characteristics of Reconfigurability and their Influencing Elements. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (2018) 11, pp. 116–121 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  264. [16] Slama, S.: Effizienzsteigerung in der Montage durch marktorientierte Montagestrukturen und erweitereter Mitarbeiterkompetenz. Bamberg: Meisenbach Verlag 2004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  265. [17] Kluge, S.: Methodik zur fähigkeitsbasierten Planung modularer Montagesysteme. Heimsheim: Jost-Jetter Verlag 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  266. [18] Gotthard, V.; Bercsey, T.: Development of Modular Production Lines. Periodica Polytechnica Ser. Mech. Eng. 50 (2006) 2, pp. 125–145 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  267. [19] Kern, W.; Rusitschka, F.; Kopytynski, W. et al.: Alternatives to assembly line production in the automotive industry. 23rd International Conference on Production Research, ICPR 2015, doi.org/10.24406/publica-fhg-391281 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  268. [20] Gauss, L.; Lacerda, D. P.; Sellitto, M. A.: Module-based machinery design: a method to support the design of modular machine families for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 102 (2019) 9–12, pp. 3911–3936 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  269. [21] Jürgensmeyer, N.; Osenberg, D.; Reitze, A. et al.: Development of a Transformation Model – Modularization Step by Step. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 92 (2020) 12, pp. 1998–2004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  270. [22] Foith-Förster, P.: Design of matrix production systems for the personalized production of mechatronic machine modules. Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  271. [23] Rothhöft, M.: Marktstudie SPS-Systeme 2022. Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Unternehmen aus dem Maschinenbau in Deutschland. Stand: 2022. Internet: www.marktstudien.org/marktstudien/marktstudie-sps-systeme/. Zugriff am 06.03.2025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  272. [24] ISO 13849–1:2023: Safety of machinery – Safety-related parts of control systems – Part 1: General principles for design. Ausgabe 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  273. [25] ISO 12100:2010: Safety of machinery – General principles for design – Risk assessment and risk reduction, Ausgabe 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-87
  274. [1] Miehe, R.; Schneider, R.; Baaij, F. et al.: Criticality of Material Resources in Industrial Enterprises – Structural Basics of an Operational Model. Procedia CIRP 48 (2016), pp. 1–9 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  275. [2] Miehe, R.; Buckreus, L.; Kiemel, S. et al.: A Conceptual Framework for Biointelligent Production—Calling for Systemic Life Cycle Thinking in Cellular Units. Clean Technologies 3 (2021) 4, pp. 844–857 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  276. [3] Weiss, M.; Haufe, J.; Carus, M. et al.: A Review of the Environmental Impacts of Biobased Materials. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16 (2012) s1, doi.org/10.1111/j.1530–9290.2012.00468.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  277. [4] Ferrari, F.; Striani, R.; Fico, D. et al.: An Overview on Wood Waste Valorization as Biopolymers and Biocomposites: Definition, Classification, Production, Properties and Applications. Polymers 14 (2022) 24, #5519, doi.org/10.3390/polym14245519 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  278. [5] Cabeza, C.; Gaffey, J.; Hendriks, K. et al.: Potential of biomass sidestreams for a sustainable biobased economy. Bringing added value to agriculture and forest sectors by closing the research and innovation divide. Stuttgart: Steinbeis-Edition 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  279. [6] Hassan, M. K.; Villa, A.; Kuittinen, S. et al.: An assessment of side-stream generation from Finnish forest industry. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 21 (2019) 2, pp. 265–280 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  280. [7] Full, J.; Shoshi, A.; Gamero, E. et al.: Biointelligent Waste-to-X systems: A novel concept for sustainable, decentralized and interconnected value creation. Procedia CIRP 116 (2023), pp. 576–581 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  281. [8] Protte, K.; Schwarz, O.: Additive manufacturing with chitin – Investigating the feasibility of an enzyme-assisted material approach for more sustainability. Procedia CIRP 107 (2022), pp. 149–154 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  282. [9] Silber, N.; Hessel, J.; Eigner, S. et al.: Towards an Enzymatic Approach to Valorize Wood Residues for Industrial Production in a Circular Bioeconomy. Procedia CIRP 116 (2023), pp. 450–455 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  283. [10] Protte-Freitag, K.; Gotzig, S.; Rothe, H. et al.: Enzyme-Assisted Circular Additive Manufacturing as an Enabling Technology for a Circular Bioeconomy—A Conceptual Review. Sustainability 16 (2024) 5, #2167, doi.org/10.3390/su16052167 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  284. [11] Zaaba, N. F.; Jaafar, M.: A review on degradation mechanisms of polylactic acid: Hydrolytic, photodegradative, microbial, and enzymatic degradation. Polymer Engineering & Science 60 (2020) 9, pp. 2061–2075 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  285. [12] Rosli, N. A.; Karamanlioglu, M.; Kargarzadeh, H. et al.: Comprehensive exploration of natural degradation of poly(lactic acid) blends in various degradation media: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 187 (2021), pp. 732–741 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  286. [13] Suarez, N. E.; Inalbon, M. C.; Meyer, C. I. et al.: A Wood Bioplastic Composite From Soy Flour And Sawdust. Latin American applied research 50 (2020) 2, pp. 95–100 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  287. [14] Podlena, M.; Böhm, M.; Saloni, D. et al.: Tuning the Adhesive Properties of Soy Protein Wood Adhesives with Different Coadjutant Polymers, Nanocellulose and Lignin. Polymers 13 (2021) 12, doi.org/10.3390/polym13121972 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  288. [15] Kieliszek, M.; Misiewicz, A.: Microbial transglutaminase and its application in the food industry. A review. Folia microbiologica 59 (2014) 3, pp. 241–250 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  289. [16] Greenberg, C. S.; Birckbichler, P. J.; Rice, R. H.: Transglutaminases: multifunctional cross-linking enzymes that stabilize tissues. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 5 (1991) 15, pp. 3071–3077 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  290. [17] Gouseti, O.; Larsen, M. E.; Amin, A. et al.: Applications of Enzyme Technology to Enhance Transition to Plant Proteins: A Review. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) 12 (2023) 13, doi.org/10.3390/foods12132518 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  291. [18] Zeeb, B.; McClements, D. J.; Weiss, J.: Enzyme-Based Strategies for Structuring Foods for Improved Functionality. Annual review of food science and technology 8 (2017), pp. 21–34 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  292. [19] Shanbhag, G.; Wheat, E.; Moylan, S. et al.: Effect of specimen geometry and orientation on tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by electron beam powder bed fusion. Additive Manufacturing 48 Part A (2021), #102366 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  293. [20] Batley, A.; Glithro, R.; Dyer, B. et al.: Evaluation of Tensile Strength and Repeatability of 3D Printed Carbon Fiber Materials and Processes. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 11 (2024) 5, doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2022.0262 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  294. [21] Tanveer, M. Q.; Haleem, A.; Suhaib, M.: Effect of variable infill density on mechanical behaviour of 3-D printed PLA specimen: an experimental investigation. SN Applied Sciences 1 (2019), #1701 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  295. [22] Travieso-Rodriguez, J. A.; Jerez-Mesa, R.; Llumà, J. et al.: Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printing Polylactic Acid Parts subjected to Bending Stress and Fatigue Testing. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 12 (2019) 23, doi.org/10.3390/ma12233859 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  296. [23] Atakok, G.; Kam, M.; Koc, H. B.: Tensile, three-point bending and impact strength of 3D printed parts using PLA and recycled PLA filaments: A statistical investigation. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 18 (2022), pp. 1542–1554 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  297. [24] Novianti, T.; Anna, I. D.; Cahyadi, I.: Optimization of bioplastic’s tensile strength. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1211 (2019), #12048 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  298. [25] Hariati, A.; Harsojuwono, B. A.; Suyanto, H. et al.: Characteristics of starch-based bioplastic composites in the ratio variations of the polysaccharide mixture. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 13 (2021) 02, doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2021.13.02.223 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  299. [26] Amin, M. R.; Chowdhury, M. A.; Kowser, M. A.: Characterization and performance analysis of composite bioplastics synthesized using titanium dioxide nanoparticles with corn starch. Heliyon 5 (2019) 8, e02009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  300. [27] Evstigneev, E. I.: Specific features of lignin dissolution in aqueous and aqueous-organic media. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry 83 (2010) 3, pp. 509–513 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  301. [28] Evstigneev, E. I.: Factors affecting lignin solubility. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry 84 (2011) 6, pp. 1040–1045 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  302. [29] Mauri, A. N.; Añón, M. C.: Effect of solution pH on solubility and some structural properties of soybean protein isolate films. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86 (2006) 7, pp. 1064–1072 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  303. [30] Evstigneyev, E. I.; Shevchenko, S. M.: Structure, chemical reactivity and solubility of lignin: a fresh look. Wood Science and Technology 53 (2019) 1, pp. 7–47 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  304. [31] Melro, E.; Alves, L.; Antunes, F. E. et al.: A brief overview on lignin dissolution. Journal of Molecular Liquids 265 (2018), pp. 578–584 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  305. [32] Gilomen, K.; Stauffer, H. P.; Meyer, V. R.: Detoxification of Acetonitrile – Water Wastes from Liquid Chromatography. Chromatographia 41 (1995) 7/8, pp. 488–491 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  306. [33] Jin, M.; Huang, J.; Pei, Z. et al.: Purification and characterization of a high-salt-resistant microbial transglutaminase from Streptomyces mobaraensis. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 133 (2016), pp. 6–11 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-96
  307. [1] Gebhardt, A.: Additive Fertigungsverfahren. Additive Manufacturing und 3D-Drucken für Prototyping - Tooling - Produktion. München: Hanser 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102
  308. [2] Bagehorn, S.; Wehr, J.; Maier, H. J.: Application of mechanical surface finishing processes for roughness reduction and fatigue improvement of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V parts. International Journal of Fatigue 102 (2017), S. 135–142 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102
  309. [3] Berger, U.; Hartmann, A.; Schmid, D.: 3D-Druck - Additive Fertigungsverfahren. Rapid Prototyping - Rapid Tooling - Rapid Manufacturing. Haan-Gruiten: Verlag Europa-Lehrmittel - Nourney Vollmer GmbH & Co. KG 2023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102
  310. [4] Nalli, F.; Bottini, L.; Boschetto, A. et al.: Effect of Industrial Heat Treatment and Barrel Finishing on the Mechanical Performance of Ti6Al4V Processed by Selective Laser Melting. Applied Sciences 10 (2020) 7, S. 2280 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102
  311. [5] Klocke, F.: Fertigungsverfahren 2. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102
  312. [6] Khorasani, M.; Ghasemi, A. H.; Farabi, E. et al.: A comprehensive investigation of abrasive barrel finishing on hardness and manufacturability of laser-based powder bed fusion hollow components. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 120 (2022) 5-6, S. 3471–3490 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102
  313. [7] Radziejewska, J.; Marczak, M.; Maj, P. et al.: Influence of post-processing on surface texture of additive manufacturing micro-elements. XIV INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ELECTROMACHINING 2023, Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2024, S. 20031 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102
  314. [8] Rosswag GmbH: Titanlegierung TiAl6V4. Internet: https://www.rosswag-engineering.de/werkstoff-titanium-alloy-tial6v4. Zugriff am 31.07.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102
  315. [9] EOS GmbH: EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg. Material Data Sheet. Internet: https://www.eos.info/03_system-related-assets/material-related-contents/metal-materials-and-examples/metal-material-datasheet/aluminium/material_datasheet_eos_aluminium-alsi10mg_en_web.pdf. Zugriff am 31.07.2024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2025-03-102

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media