Who Pays the Piper calls the Tune? The implementation of the Union budget in the Institutional Framework of the European Union
Table of contents
Bibliographic information

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Volume 29 (2026), Issue 2
- Authors:
- | | | | | |
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Copyright Year
- 2026
- ISSN-Online
- 2942-3589
- ISSN-Print
- 1435-439X
Chapter information
Volume 29 (2026), Issue 2
Who Pays the Piper calls the Tune? The implementation of the Union budget in the Institutional Framework of the European Union
- Authors:
- |
- ISSN-Print
- 1435-439X
- ISSN-Online
- 2942-3589
- Preview:
The EU budget is an important tool for the attainment of the Union’s political and constitutional priorities. Despite its political significance, EU primary law sets only high-level principles as to the responsibilities for executing and implementing the Union budget. Against this background, this article provides a thorough analysis of the legal-constitutional principles guiding the budget implementation as set by the EU Treaties. Specifically, the article considers the European Commission’s responsibility under the current legal framework for implementing the Union budget. It, furthermore, distinguishes this responsibility from the respective role of the European Parliament and the Council as budgetary and legislative authority, and it legally qualifies typical practical cases of budget implementation. While the legislator enjoys certain leeway when defining what constitutes budget implementation in the context of a concrete legislative (basic) act, the article shows that there is a hard core of budget implementation which should remain reserved to the Commission. By combining the analysis of the legal framework with its practical implementation, this article contributes to establishing a clearer understanding of the role of the respective institutions in the implementation of the Union budget as well as of the primary law requirements for budget implementation.
Bibliography
No match found. Try another term.
- BIEBER, ROLAND, Art. 315 AEUV, in: von der Groeben, Hans; Schwarze, Jürgen; Hatje, Armin; Terhechte, Jörg Philipp (eds.), Europäisches Unionsrecht. Article-by-Article Commentary, 7th edition, Baden-Baden, 2015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- BUCHET, ANTOINE, La réforme des pouvoirs conférés à la Commission européenne, entre métamorphose et réminiscence, Cahiers de droit européen, 2018, Vol. 54(3), pp. 205–250 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- CHAMON, MERIJN, Case Note: Only Fans of the Council's implementing powers in Luxembourg, Common Market Law Review, 2023, Vol. 60(6), pp. 1683–1704 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- CHAMON, MERIJN, Case Note: Fining Member States under the SGP, or how enforcement is different from implementation under Article 291 TFEU: Spain v. Council, Common Market Law Review, 2018, Vol. 55(5), pp. 1495–1520 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- EHLERMANN, CLAUS-DIETER; MINCH, MARY, Conflicts between Community Institutions within the Budgetary Procedure – Article 205 EEC, Europarecht, 1981, Vol. 16(1), pp. 23–42 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- FORMAN, JOHN, Case Note: Case 16/88, Commission, supported by Parliament v. Council, Judgment of 24 October 1989, Common Market Law Review, 1990, Vol. 27(4), pp. 872–882 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- FORMAN, JOHN, Implementing the Community Budget, Revue d’intégration européenne, 1985, Vol. 8 (2/3), pp. 139–156 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- HERVEY, TAMARA, Case Note: Case C-106/96, United Kingdom v. Commission (Poverty 4) [Court of Justice of the European Communities], Common Market Law Review, 1999, Vol. 36(5), pp. 1079–1090 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- INGHELRAM, JAN, Budget and Finances, in: Kuijper, Pieter Jan; Amtenbrink, Fabian; Curtin, Deirdre; De Witte, Bruno; Mcdonnell, Alison; Van Den Bogaert, Stefaan (eds.), The Law of the European Union, 5th edition, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp. 313–356 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- KILPATRICK, CLAIRE, Explaining and Remedying the Near Absence of the Budget in EU Law Scholarship, Common Market Law Review, 2024, Vol. 61(3), pp. 623–654 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- MAGIERA, SIEGFRIED, Art. 314 AEUV, in: Grabitz, Eberhard; Hilf, Meinhard; Nettesheim, Martin (eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union. Article-by-Article Commentary, 86th edition, München, 2025 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- MANTL, LEOPOLD; TRITZ, CHRISTINA, Ein neuer Finanzierungsrahmen für die Kohäsion in der EU, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2021, Vol. 32(23), pp. 1019–1025 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- RITLENG, DOMINIQUE, Case Note: Case C 427/12, European Commission v European Parliament and Council of the European Union [Court of Justice of the European Union], Common Market Law Review, 2015, Vol. 52(1), pp. 243–258 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
- STELKENS, ULRICH, Art. 291, das Unionsverwaltungsrecht und die Verwaltungsautonomie der Mitgliedstaaten -zugleich zur Abgrenzung der Anwendungsbereiche von Art. 290 und Art. 291 AEUV, Europarecht, 2012, Vol. 47(5), pp. 511–545 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2026-2-228
