Representing the Marginalized. A Critical Interrogation of (Self-)Representation

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft Volume 73 (2025), Issue 3
Open Access Full access

M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft

Volume 73 (2025), Issue 3

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2025
ISSN-Online
2942-3317
ISSN-Print
1615-634X

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 73 (2025), Issue 3

Representing the Marginalized. A Critical Interrogation of (Self-)Representation

Authors:
ISSN-Print
1615-634X
ISSN-Online
2942-3317
Preview:

This contribution connects post- and decolonial theoretical perspectives on “representation” with previous communications research to explore how journalism can—or cannot—produce spaces for subversive speaking and listening. Specifically, we focus on moments of tension and negotiation surrounding the reporting on colonial and racial injustices in German journalism. The article addresses two main questions: (1) What patterns of (post-)colonial representation appear in journalistic reporting on racist and colonial injustices? (2) How do these patterns shape the speaking positions from which formerly colonized subjects can or cannot speak and be heard in journalistic reporting? These questions are answered through two critical discourse analyses, focusing on coverage of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests in Germany and the German-Namibian negotiations over reparations for colonial genocide. The analysis reveals three representational patterns that continue to restrict how members of Germany’s Black community and Namibia’s Indigenous communities are represented in German media coverage: homogenization, irritation, and containment. The findings highlight the urgent need to reorient contemporary journalism within the context of colonial power structures.

Bibliography

  1. Ahmed, S. (2014): The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  2. Arndt, S., & Hamann, U. (2021). Mohr_in. In S. Arndt & N. Ofuatey-Alazard (Eds.), Wie Rassismus aus Wörtern spricht. (K)Erben des Kolonialismus im Wissensarchiv deutsche Sprache. Ein kritisches Nachschlagewerk [How racism speaks from words. Heritage/noches of colonialism of the knowledge archive of German language, A critical reader] (4th ed., pp. 649–653). Unrast Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  3. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2013). Postcolonial studies: The key concepts (3rd ed.). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  4. Balibar, E. (1991). Is there a “Neo-Racism”? In E. Balibar & I. Wallerstein, Race, nation, class. Ambiguous identities (pp. 17–28). Verso. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  5. Bielicki, J. (2019). Cologne’s new year’s eve sexual assaults. The turning point in German Media Coverage. In G. Dell’Orto & I. Wetzstein (Hrsg.), Refugee news, refugee politics journalism, public opinion and policy making in Europe (pp. 184–190). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  6. Blaagaard, B. B. (2011). Whose freedom? Whose memories? Commemorating Danish colonialism in St. Croix. Social Identities, 17(1), 61–72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  7. Çaglar, D., & Sridharan, A. (2021). Gemeinsam die Einwanderungsgesellschaft gestalten. Bericht der Fachkommission der Bundesregierung zu den Rahmenbedingungen der Integrationsfähigkeit [Shaping the immigration society together. Report of the federal government’s expert commission on the framework conditions for integration capacity]. Fachkommission Integrationsfähigkeit. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  8. Carney, N., & Kelekay, J. (2022). Framing the Black Lives Matter Movement: An Analysis of Shifting News Coverage in 2014 and 2020. Social Currents, 9(6), 558–572. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  9. Castro Varela, M., & Dhawan, N. (2020): Postkoloniale Theorie. Eine kritische Einführung. transcript. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  10. Chasi, C., & Rodny-Gumede, Y. (2022): Decolonial Journalism: New Notes on Ubuntu and the Public Interest. In: Journalism Studies, 23(13), 1625–1637. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  11. Chakravartty, P. (2019). Media, race and the infrastructure of empire. In J. Curran & D. Hesmondhalgh (Eds.), Media and Society (pp. 245–262). Bloomsbury. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  12. Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  13. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity. Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  14. Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  15. Delgado, J. M. (1972). Die „Gastarbeiter“ in der Presse. Eine inhaltsanalytische Studie. Leske. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  16. Dhawan, N., & Castro Varela, M. do M. (2020). Die Migrantin retten!? Zum vertrackten Verhältnis von Geschlechtergewalt, Rassismus und Handlungsmacht. In E. Hausbacher, L. Herbst, J. Ostwald, & M. Thiele, Geschlecht_transkulturell. Aktuelle Forschungsperspektiven (pp. 303–321). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  17. Dietze, G. (2016). Ethosexismus: Sex-Mob-Narrative um die Kölner Silvesternacht. Movements – Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 2(1), 1–16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  18. Dindler, C., & Blaagaard, B. B. (2021). The colour-line of journalism: Exploring racism as a boundary object in journalistic practice and principle. Journalistica, 1, 90–113. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  19. Duisburger Institut für Sprach- und Sozialforschung (1999). Medien und Straftaten. Vorschläge zur Vermeidung diskriminierender Berichterstattung über Einwanderer und Flüchtlinge. DISS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  20. Fanon, F. (1999). The fact of blackness. In J. Evans & S. Hall (Eds.), Visual culture: The reader (pp. 417–420). SAGE Publications & The Open University. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  21. Foucault, M. (1981): Archäologie des Wissens. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  22. Fürsich, E. (2010): Media and the representation of Others. In: International Social Science Journal, 61(199), 113–130. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  23. Geiger, K. F. (1985). Rassismus und Ausländerfeindlichkeit in Deutschland. Beiträge zu ihrer Erforschung. Gesamthochschulbibliothek. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  24. Goebel, S. (2017). Politische Talkshows über Flucht: Wirklichkeitskonstruktionen und Diskurse: eine kritische Analyse. transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  25. Grosfoguel, R. (1999). Introduction: “Cultural racism” and colonial caribbean migrants in core zones of the capitalist world-economy. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 22(4), 409–434. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  26. Hall, S. (1989): Cultural identity and cinematic representation. In: Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media (36), 68–81. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  27. Hall, S. (1997): The work of representation. In: S. Hall (Ed.), Representation. Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13–75). SAGE. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  28. Hall, S. (2019): Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. In: D. Morley (Ed.), Foundations of cultural studies (pp. 257–276). Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  29. Haller, M. (2017). Die „Flüchtlingskrise“ in den Medien. Tagesaktueller Journalismus zwischen Meinung und Information. Otto Brenner Stiftung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  30. Hill Collins, P. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. The Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  31. Holzberg, B., Kolbe, K., & Zaborowski, R. (2018). Figures of Crisis: The Delineation of (Un)Deserving Refugees in the German Media. Sociology, 52(3), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518759460 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  32. Hömberg, W., & Schlemmer, S. (1995). Fremde als Objekt. Asylberichterstattung in deutschen Tageszeitungen. Media Perspektiven, 1, 11–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  33. hooks, bell (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  34. hooks, bell (2015). Feminism is for everybody. Passionate politics. Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  35. Jäger, S. (2000). Das Fremde und die Medien. Rassismus und rassistisch motivierte Verbrechen dauern an. Medien Impulse, 17–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  36. Jäger, S. (2015). Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung (7th ed.). Unrast. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  37. Kerner, I. (2009). Differenzen und Macht. Zur Anatomie von Rassismus und Sexismus. Campus Verlag GmbH. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  38. Klaus, E., Drüeke, R., Thiele, M., & Goldmann, J. E. (2018). „Die Welt ist ein Riesenphonograph“. In R. Drüeke, E. Klaus, M. Thiele, & J. E. Goldmann (Eds.), Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Gender Studies (pp. 11–38). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839438374-003 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  39. Klaus, E., & Kirchhoff, S. (2016). Journalismustheorien und Geschlechterforschung. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Eds.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (pp. 523–536). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  40. Klaus, E., & Lünenborg, M. (2012). Cultural citizenship. Participation by and through media. In E. Zobl & R. Drüeke, Feminist media. Participatory spaces, networks and cultural citizenship (pp. 197–212). transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  41. Kloppenburg, J. (2014). Zur medialen Verhandlung von Migrantinnen und Migranten in Fernsehnachrichten. In S. Geise & K. Lobinger (Hrsg.), Bilder—Kulturen—Identitäten. Analysen zu einem Spannungsfeld visueller Kommunikationsforschung (pp. 125–141). Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  42. Kumar, S. (2014): Media, Communication and Postcolonial Theory. In M. Fackler, & R. S. Fortner (Eds.), The handbook of media and mass communication theory (pp. 380–399). John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  43. Kumar, S., & Parameswaran, R. (2018): Charting an itinerary for postcolonial communication and media studies. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 347–358. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  44. Lünenborg, M. (2019). Representing migration—Building national identity: Pictures of difference and emnity in German media. In A. Grüne, K. Hafez, S. Priyadharma, & S. Schmidt, Media and transformation in Germany and Indonesia (pp. 161–186). Frank & Timme. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  45. Lünenborg, M., Fritsche, K. & Bach, A. (2014): Migrantinnen in den Medien. Darstellungen in der Presse und ihre Rezeption. transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  46. Lünenborg, M. & Medeiros, D. (2021): Redaktionen dekolonisieren! Journalismus für die Einwanderungsgesellschaft. In ´H. Dilger, & M. Warstat (Eds.), Umkämpfte Vielfalt. Affektive Dynamiken institutioneller Diversifizierung (pp. 95–115). Campus. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  47. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis. A multimodal introduction. Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  48. Maier, T. (2018). Von der Repräsentationskritik zur Sichtbarkeitspolitik. In R. Drüeke, E. Klaus, M. Thiele, & J. E. Goldmann (Eds.), Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Gender Studies: Zur Aktualität kritischer Gesellschaftsanalyse (pp. 77–90). transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  49. Marriott, D. (2018): The X of Representation. In Qui Parle, 27(2), pp. 355–430. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  50. Merten, K. (1986). Das Bild der Ausländer in der deutschen Presse. Ergebnisse einer systematischen Inhaltsanalyse. Dagyeli. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  51. Meyen, M. (2013). Wir haben freier gelebt. transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  52. Mikos, L. (2023). Inhalt und Repräsentation. In L. Mikos (Ed.), Film- und Fernsehanalyse (4th ed., pp. 122–146). utb GmbH. https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838559810 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  53. Milman, N., Ajayi, F., Della Porta, D., Doerr, N., Kocyba, P., Lavizzari, A., Reiter, H., Płucienniczak, P., Sommer, M., Steinhilper, E., & Zajak, S. (2021). Black Lives Matter in Europe. Transnational diffusion, local translation and resonance of anti- racist protest in Germany, Italy, Denmark and Poland. Deutsches Zentrum für Integrations- und Migrationsforschung (DeZIM). https://www.rassismusmonitor.de/fileadmin/user_upload/NaDiRa/Pdfs/DeZIM_Research_Notes__06_-_Black_Lives_Matter_in_Europe.pdf [31.07.2025]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  54. Moyo, L. (2020): The decolonial turn in media studies in Africa and the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  55. Müller, D. (2005). Die Darstellung ethnischer Minderheiten in deutschen Massenmedien. In R. Geißler & H. Pöttker, Massenmedien und die Integration ethnischer Minderheiten in Deutschland (pp. 83–126). transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  56. Müller, T. (2017). Constructing cultural borders: Depictions of Muslim refugees in British and German media. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 12, 263–277. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  57. Ng, E., White, K. C., & Saha, A. (2020). #CommunicationSoWhite: Race and power in the academy and beyond. Communication, Culture and Critique, 13(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa011 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  58. Nothias, T. (2020): Postcolonial reflexivity in the news industry: The case of foreign correspondents in Kenya and South Africa. Journal of Communication, 70(2), 245–273. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  59. Parameswaran, R. (2008): The Other Sides of Globalization: Communication, Culture, and Postcolonial Critique. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(1), 116–125. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  60. Persram, N. (2011): Spatial and temporal dislocations of theory, subjectivity, and postreason in the geocolonial politics of subaltern studies. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11(1), 9–23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  61. Räthzel, N. (2010). Rassimustheorien: Geschlechterverhältnisse und Feminismus. In R. Becker & B. Kortendieck, Handbuch Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung. Theorie, Methode, Empirie (3rd ed., pp. 283–291). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  62. Ruhrmann, G., & Kollmer, J. (1987). Ausländerberichterstattung in der Kommune. Inhaltsanalyse Bielefelder Tageszeitungen unter Berücksichtigung “ausländerfeindlicher” Alltagstheorien. Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  63. Said, E. W. (1978): Orientalism. Western conceptions of the Orient. Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  64. Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism (1st Vintage Books ed). Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  65. Said, E. W. (1993): Culture and imperialism. Chatto & Windus. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  66. Said, E. W. (1997): Covering Islam. How the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  67. Salem, S., & Thompson, V. (2016). Old racisms, new masks: On the continuing discontinuities of racism and the erasure of race in European contexts. Nineteen Sixty Nine: An Ethnic Studies Journal, 3(1), 1–23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  68. Schaffer, J. (2008): Ambivalenzen der Sichtbarkeit. Über die visuellen Strukturen der Anerkennung. transcript. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  69. Schneider, J., Fincke, G., & Will, A.-K. (2013). Muslime in der Mehrheitsgesellschaft: Medienbild und Alltagserfahrung in Deutschland [Policy Brief]. Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Migration und Integration. https://www.svr-migration.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Medienbild-Muslime_SVR-FB_final.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  70. Shome, R. (2016): When postcolonial studies meets media studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(3), 245–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  71. Shome, R. (2018): Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Relevance for communication studies. https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-600 [31.07.2025]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  72. Shome, R. (2019): When postcolonial studies interrupts media studies. Communication, Culture and Critique, 12(3), 305–322. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  73. Shome, R., & Hegde, R. S. (2002): Postcolonial Approaches to Communication: Charting the terrain, engaging the intersections. Communication Theory, 12(3), 249–270. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  74. Spivak, G. C. (1988): Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson, & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). Macmillan Education UK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  75. Spivak, G. C. (1996): Subaltern Talk. Interview with the editors. In D. Landry, & G. MacLean (Eds.), The Spivak Reader. Selected works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (pp. 287–308). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  76. Spivak, G. C. (2003). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present (4th ed.). Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  77. Stewart, S. (1991): Crimes of writing: Problems in the containment of representation. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  78. Tränhardt, D. (2018). Welcoming citizens, divided government, simplifying media. Germany’s refugee crisis, 2015–2017. In G. Dell’Orto, & I. Wetzstein, Refugee news, refugee politics. Journalism, public opinion and policy making in Europe (pp. 15–25). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  79. Weiß, A.-N. (2025). Between normative universality and sharing embodied knowledge. Exploring the (re-)definition of legitimate knowledge and knowers using the example of the German public media debate about racism. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, 1536195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1536195 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  80. Winker, G., & Degele, N. (2009). Intersektionalität. Zur Analyse sozialer Ungleichheiten. transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  81. Zelizer, B. (2017): What journalism could be. Polity. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  82. List of Quoted Sources Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  83. Newspapers Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  84. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (02.10.2021). „Alte deutsche Schuld“. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  85. Namibian Sun (03.09.2018). „Müntefering’s apology torn apart.“ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  86. Süddeutsche Zeitung (29.05.21). „Kurz und blutig“ / „Zeit der Schuld“ / „Chor der Vernachlässigten“ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  87. die tageszeitung (09.03.2019). „Restitution als Chance“. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  88. Talk shows Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  89. Belli, Aminata, & Tesfai, Hadnet (hosts) 2020. “Sitzplatzreservierung 6a.” Berlin, July. Video, 55 min., 5 sec https://www.instagram.com/tv/CDevkqDKb8S/?igsh=MXFrOW84M3JhbnZ6MA%3D%3D [31.07.2025]. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334
  90. Plasberg, Frank (host) 2020. „Hart aber fair: Streit um die Sprache: Was darf man noch sagen und was besser nicht?“ Köln, October, Video, 1h, 14 min, 20 sec. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1615-634X-2025-3-334

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Full download (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media