From rainbow flags to red flags: How attitudes toward gender equality and LGBTIQ+ shape voting behavior

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Volume 11 (2026), Issue 1
Open Access Full access

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Volume 11 (2026), Issue 1


Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2026
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Chapter information


Open Access Full access

Volume 11 (2026), Issue 1

From rainbow flags to red flags: How attitudes toward gender equality and LGBTIQ+ shape voting behavior


Authors:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742


Preview:

Post-industrial societies increasingly face conflicting forces that simultaneously advance and resist gender equality. While policy efforts have advanced women’s and LGBTIQ+ rights, a reactionary discourse has gained traction in Europe, often framed as a “war on gender ideology”. While research has extensively explored the role of sexism in voting behavior, comparatively less attention has been paid to attitudes toward LGBTIQ+. Notably, it remains unclear how social groups combine support for women and LGBTIQ+ rights and how they translate into voting behavior. To address this gap, this study poses two key questions: (1) To what extent do attitudes toward women and LGBTIQ+ rights differ in their degree of polarization? (2) How do these attitudes shape voting behavior, and are there discernible differences in their influence? Using original survey data from ten European countries, this paper demonstrates that LGBTIQ+ rights are significantly more contested than gender equality. Moreover, opposition to gender equality and LGBTIQ+ rights is a strong and consistent driver of far-right support, whereas progressive views mainly benefit the Greens but translate into partisan loyalty less directly and consistently. As such, this study enhances the literature theoretically and empirically by linking attitudes on the two issues to political preferences in contemporary democracies.

Bibliography


  1. Abou-Chadi, T., Breyer, M. & Gessler, T. (2021). The (Re)politicisation of Gender in Western Europe. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 4(2), 311–314. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  2. Ahrens, P., Ayoub, P. M. & Lang, S. (2022). Leading from Behind? Gender Equality in Germany During the Merkel Era. German Politics, 31(1), 1–19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  3. Akkerman, T. (2015). Gender and the Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Agendas. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 37–60. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  4. Allen, T. J. & Goodman, S. W. (2021). Individual- and Party-Level Determinants of Far-Right Support Among Women in Western Europe. European Political Science Review, 13(2), 135–150. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  5. Anduiza, E. & Rico, G. (2024). Sexism and the Far‐Right Vote: The Individual Dynamics of Gender Backlash. American Journal of Political Science, 68(2), 478–493. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  6. Beckwith, K. (2000). Beyond Compare? Women’s Movements in Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 37(4), 431–468. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  7. Bernardez-Rodal, A., Requeijo Rey, P. & Franco, Y. G. (2022). Radical Right Parties and Anti-Feminist Speech on Instagram: Vox and the 2019 Spanish General Election. Party Politics, 28(2), 272–283. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  8. Bornschier S. (2010). Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  9. Bornschier, S., Häusermann, S., Zollinger, D. & Colombo, C. (2021). How “Us” and “Them” Relates to Voting Behavior: Social Structure, Social Identities, and Electoral Choice. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2087–2122. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  10. Breyer, M. (2024). Backlash or Progressive Mobilization? Voter Reactions to Perceived Trajectories of Women’s Representation. Comparative Political Studies, 57(13), 2193–2224. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  11. Butler, J. (2024). Who’s Afraid of Gender? New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  12. Pérez, L. C., de Oger, S. A. S. & Fortes, B. G. (2023). Ideology and Party Positions on Gender Issues in Spain: Evidence from a Novel Data Set. Politics & Gender, 19(4), 1204–1230. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  13. Campbell, A., Coverse, P. E., Miller, W. E. & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  14. Campbell, R. & Erzeel, S. (2018). Exploring Gender Differences in Support for Rightist Parties: The Role of Party and Gender Ideology. Politics & Gender, 14(1), 80–105. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  15. Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  16. Cassese, E. C. & Barnes, T. D. (2019). Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races. Political Behavior, 41, 677–700. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  17. Christley, O. R. (2022). Traditional Gender Attitudes, Nativism, and Support for the Radical Right. Politics & Gender, 18(4), 1141–1167. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  18. Clayton, A., O’Brien, D. Z. & Piscopo, J. M. (2019). All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 113–129. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  19. De Lange, S. & Mügge, L. (2015). Gender and Right-Wing Populism in the Low Countries: Ideological Variations Across Parties and Time. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 61–80. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  20. Dietz, M. & Roßteutscher, S. (2025). Contested Terrain. How Attitudes toward Gender Issues Shape Voting Behavior in Germany. Annual Conference of the German Political Science Association, Research Group “Elections and Political Attitudes” 2025 in Berlin, Germany, 19. September 2025. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  21. Dietze, G. & Roth J. (2020). Right-Wing Populism and Gender. European Perspectives and Beyond. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  22. European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2024). Gender Equality Index 2024: Sustaining Momentum on a Fragile Path. Retrieved from: Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  23. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index (last accessed: 2025, September 25). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  24. Erel, U. (2018). Saving and Reproducing the Nation: Struggles Around Right-wing Politics of Social Reproduction, Gender and Race in Austerity Europe. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68, 173–182. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  25. Farris, S. R. (2017). In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  26. Flood, M., Dragiewicz, M., & Pease, B. (2021). Resistance and backlash to gender equality. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 393–408. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  27. Fortin-Rittberger, J. & Eder, C. (2025). Disentangling different types of sexist attitudes and vote choice in Germany. Political Research Exchange, 7(1), 2508382. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  28. Fraser, N. (1995). Recognition or Redistribution? A Critical Reading of Iris Young’s Justice and the Politics of Difference. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 3(2), 166–180. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  29. Gaweda, B., Siddi, M. & Miller, C. (2023). What’s in a Name? Gender Equality and the European Conservatives and Reformists’ Group in the European Parliament. Party Politics, 29(5), 829–839. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  30. Gest, J., Reny, T. & Mayer, J. (2018). Roots of the Radical Right: Nostalgic Deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1694–1719. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  31. de Geus, R., Ralph-Morrow, E. & Shorrocks, R. (2022). Understanding Ambivalent Sexism and its Relationship with Electoral Choice in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 1564–1583. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  32. Green, J. & Shorrocks, R. (2023). The Gender Backlash in the Vote for Brexit. Political Behavior, 45(1), 347–371. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  33. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes toward Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  34. Graff, A. & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  35. Gwiazda A. (2023). Gender Ideologies and Polish Political Parties. Government and Opposition, 58(4), 641–660. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  36. Hark, S. & Villa, P. (2015). Anti-Genderismus. Sexualität und Geschlecht als Schauplätze aktueller politischer Auseinandersetzungen. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  37. Henninger, A. & von Wahl, A. (2014). Grand Coalition and Multi-Party Competition: Explaining Slowing Reforms in Gender Policy in Germany (2009–13). German Politics, 23(4), 386–399. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  38. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  39. Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  40. Hunklinger, M., & Ferch, N. (2020). Trans* voting: demand and supply side of trans* politics in Germany. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 3(3), 389–408. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  41. Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  42. Ignazi, P. (1992). The Silent Counter‐Revolution: Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right‐Wing Parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22(1), 3–34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  43. Ignazi, P. (2003). Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  44. ILGA-Europe. (2023). Rainbow Map 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.ilga-europe.org/report/rainbow-europe-2023/ (last accessed: 2025, September 25). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  45. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  46. Inglehart, R. & Norris, P. (2003). Rising Tide. Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  47. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O. & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social Inequality and the Reduction of Ideological Dissonance on Behalf of the System: Evidence of Enhanced System Justification among the Disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  48. Kantola, J. & Lombardo, E. (2017). Feminist Political Analysis: Exploring Strengths, Hegemonies and Limitations. Feminist Theory, 18(3), 323–341. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  49. Kehn, A. & Ruthig, J. C. (2013). Perceptions of Gender Discrimination across Six Decades: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Age. Sex roles, 69, 289–296. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  50. Kimmel, M. (2017). Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York, NY: Bold Type Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  51. Kuhar, R. & Paternotte, D. (2017). Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  52. Knuckey, J. (2019). “I just don’t think she has a Presidential Look”: Sexism and Vote Choice in the 2016 Election. Social Science Quarterly, 100(1), 342–358. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  53. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S. & Wüest, B. (2012). Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  54. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. & Frey, T. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  55. Lancaster, C. M. (2020). Not So Radical After All: Ideological Diversity Among Radical Right Supporters and Its Implications. Political Studies, 68(3), 600–616. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  56. Lavizzari, A. & Pirro, A. L. (2024). The Gender Politics of Populist Parties in Southern Europe. West European Politics, 47(7), 1473–1502. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  57. Magni, G. (2019). LGBTI Issues and Representation in the 2019 European Elections. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 2(3), 421–423. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  58. Mansbridge, J. & Shames, S. L. (2008). Toward a Theory of Backlash: Dynamic Resistance and the Central Role of Power. Politics & Gender, 4(4), 623–634. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  59. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Nelson, M. & Edwards, E. (2006). Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 155–175. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  60. Mathisen, R. B. (2025). Growing Apart: Ideological Polarization between Teenage Boys and Girls. OSF Working Paper. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  61. Meret S. & Siim B. (2013). Gender, Populism and Politics of Belonging: Discourses of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Denmark, Norway and Austria. In: Siim B. & Mokre M. (eds.) Negotiating Gender and Diversity in an Emergent European Public Sphere (78–96). Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  62. Milosav, Ð., Dickson, Z., Hobolt, S. B., Klüver, H., Kuhn, T. & Rodon, T. (2026). The Youth Gender Gap in Support for the Far Right. Journal of European Public Policy, 33(2), 444–468. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  63. Murib, Z. (2025). Gender Ideology, the Far Right, and LGBTQ Politics. Political Science & Politics, January, 1–6. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  64. Mutz, D. C. (2018). Status Threat, not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4330–E4339. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  65. Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  66. Off, G. (2023). Gender Equality Salience, Backlash and Radical Right Voting in the Gender-Equal Context of Sweden. West European Politics, 46(3), 451–476. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  67. Otteni, C. (2025a). From empowerment to participation: How women’s political empowerment shapes non-institutionalized political participation and reduces gender disparities. International Political Science Review, 01925121251357720. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  68. Otteni, C. (2025b). Polarized Equality? Ideological and Affective Divides Over Gender Equality in Europe. Social Science Quarterly, 106(7), e70120. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  69. Paternotte, D. & Kuhar, R. (2018) Disentangling and Locating the “Global Right”: Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 6–19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  70. Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  71. Reinhardt S., Heft A. & Pavan E. (2024). Varieties of Antigenderism: The Politicization of Gender Issues Across Three European Populist Radical Right Parties. Information, Communication & Society, 27(7), 1273–1294. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  72. Richardson, D. (2015). Rethinking Sexual Citizenship. Sociology, 51(2), 208–224. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  73. Rydgren, J. (2013). Class Politics and the Radical Right (Vol. 16). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  74. Sass, K. & Kuhnle, S. (2023). The Gender Cleavage: Updating Rokkanian Theory for the Twenty-First Century. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 30(1), 188–210. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  75. Sauer, B. (2017). Gesellschaftstheoretische Überlegungen zum Europäischen Rechtspopulismus. Zum Erklärungspotential der Kategorie Geschlecht. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 58(1), 3–22. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  76. Sauer, B., Kuhar, R., Ajanović E. & Saarinen, A. (2016). Exclusive Intersections. Constructions of Gender and Sexuality. In G. Lazaridis & G. Campani (eds.), Understanding the Populist Shift: Othering in a Europe in Crisis. London: Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  77. Schotel, A. L. & Mügge L. (2024). Politics without Presence? The Symbolic Representation of Trans People in Germany and the Netherlands. Politics & Gender, 20(4), 788–813. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  78. Siegel, S. & Wang, Y. A. (2018). Broken Rainbows: The Partisan Politics of Marriage Equality in Europe. European Politics and Society, 19(4), 377–395. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  79. Spierings, N. (2020). Why Gender and Sexuality Are Both Trivial and Pivotal in Populist Radical Right Parties. In: Dietze G. & Roth J. (eds), Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond (41–58). Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  80. Spierings N., Lubbers M. & Zaslove A. (2017). Sexually Modern Nativist Voters: Do They Exist and Do They Vote for the Populist Radical Right? Gender and Education, 29(2), 216–237. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  81. Swim, J. K. & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, Covert, and Subtle Sexism: A Comparison Between the Attitudes Toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 103–118. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  82. Swim, J. K. & Hyers, L. L. (2009). Sexism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (407–430). New York: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  83. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S. & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and Racism: Old-Fashioned and Modern Prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  84. Tremblay M. & Paternotte, D. (2011). The Lesbian and Gay Movement and the State: Comparative Insights into a Transformed Relationship. London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  85. Valentino, N. A., Wayne, C. & Oceno, M. (2018). Mobilizing Sexism: The Interaction of Emotion and Gender Attitudes in the 2016 US Presidential Election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 799–821. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  86. van der Eijk, C. (2001). Measuring Agreement in Ordered Rating Scales. Quality and Quantity 35: 325–341. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  87. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem). (2025). Graphing Tool. Retrieved from: https://v-dem.net/data_analysis/VariableGraph/ (last accessed: 2025, September 25). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  88. Wallaschek, S., Verbalyte, M. & Eigmüller, M. (2024). Cleavage Theory Meets Gender Equality: Examining Party Positions in Germany. European Politics and Society, 25(5), 809–826. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  89. Weeks, A. C., Caravantes, P. Espírito-Santo, A., Lombardo, E., Stratigaki, M. & Gul, S. (2024). When is Gender on Party Agendas? Manifestos and (De-)democratisation in Greece, Portugal, and Spain. South European Society and Politics, 1–33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex