Popularity cues in online media: A review of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and general effects

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Volume 7 (2018), Issue 2
Open Access Full access

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Volume 7 (2018), Issue 2

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2018
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 7 (2018), Issue 2

Popularity cues in online media: A review of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and general effects

Authors:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bodenhausen, G. V., & Hugenberg, K. (2009). Attention, perception, and social cognition. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  2. In F. Strack & J. Förster (Eds.), Social cognition: The basis of human interaction Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  3. (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  4. Brosius, H.-B., & Mundorf, N. (1990). Eins und eins ist ungleich zwei: Differentielle Aufmerksamkeit, Lebhaftigkeit von Information und Medienwirkung [One plus one is not two: Differential attention, vividness of information, and media effects]. Publizistik, 35(4), 398–407. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  5. Bushman, B. J., & Wang, M. C. (2009). Vote-counting procedures in meta-analysis. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (pp. 207–220). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  6. Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales. An empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  7. Evatt, D. (1997). The influence of emotion-evoking content of news on issue salience (Dissertation). University of Texas, Austin, TX. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  8. Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  9. Hardmeier, S. (2008). The effects of published polls on citizens. In W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 504–513). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  10. Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  11. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  12. Hu, R., & Pu, P. (2014). Exploring personality’s effect on users’ rating behavior. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2599–2604). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581317 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  13. Kim, H.-S., Brubaker, P., & Seo, K. (2015). Examining psychological effects of source cues and social plugins on a product review website. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.058 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  14. Kim, H.-S., & Sundar, S. S. (2014). Can online buddies and bandwagon cues enhance user participation in online health communities? Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 319– 333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.039 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  15. Kiousis, S. (2004). Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 U.S. Presidential election. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02614.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  16. Kisielius, J., & Sternthal, B. (1984). Detecting and explaining vividness effects in attitudinal judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/3151792 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  17. Kisielius, J., & Sternthal, B. (1986). Examining the vividness controversy: An availabilityvalence interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 418–431. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  18. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Sharma, N., Hansen, D. L., & Alter, S. (2005). Impact of popularity indications on readers’ selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  19. Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Lessard, K. (2016). User engagement with online news: Conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments. New Media & Society, 18(3), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444814545073 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  20. Kümpel, A. S., Karnowski, V., & Keyling, T. (2015). News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  21. Lee, Y. (2009). Taking cues from others: The effect of distinct self-views on the persuasiveness of extrinsic brand popularity information. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 981–982. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  22. Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  23. Nabi, R. L., & Hendriks, A. (2003). The persuasive effect of host and audience reaction shots in television talk shows. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 527–543. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02606.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  24. Napoli, P. M. (2010). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  25. Neo, R. L. (2010). Examining the impact of multiple negative online consumer reviews and review helpfulness ratings on persuasion. Retrieved from http://citation.allacadem-ic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/4/0/3/9/0/p403903_index.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  26. Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2017). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444817701318 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  27. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings in social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  28. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence. A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  29. Peter, C., Rossmann, C., & Keyling, T. (2014). Exemplification 2.0: Roles of direct and indirect social information in conveying health messages through social network sites. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 26(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000103 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  30. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  31. Posner, M. I. (1994). Attention: The mechanisms of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91(16), 7398–7403. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  32. Stavrositu, C. D., & Kim, J. (2014). Social media metrics: Third-person perceptions of health information. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 61–67. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.025 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  33. Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psychological Review, 89(2), 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.155 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  34. Walther, J. B., Liang, Y. (Jake), Ganster, T., Wohn, D. Y., & Emington, J. (2012). Online reviews, helpfulness ratings, and consumer attitudes: An extension of congruity theory to multiple sources in web 2.0. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01595.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  35. Weber, P. (2014). Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments. New Media & Society, 16(6), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813495165 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  36. Xu, X., Hao, X., & Younbo, J. (2015). An information-processing model for audiences’ selections of movies. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(4), 187–199. https://doi.org/ 10.1027/1864-1105/a000157 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  37. Yang, J. (2016). Effects of popularity-based news recommendations (“most-viewed”) on users’ exposure to online news. Media Psychology, 19(2), 243–271. https://doi.org/10. 1080/15213269.2015.1006333 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  38. Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2015). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1007– Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
  39. 1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813520477 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media