Competing Intellectual Currents within Modern Turkish Conservatism: The Bergsonian Connection

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: DIYÂR Volume 2 (2021), Issue 2
Full access

DIYÂR

Volume 2 (2021), Issue 2


Authors:
Publisher
Ergon, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2021
ISSN-Online
2942-3155
ISSN-Print
2625-9842

Chapter information


Full access

Volume 2 (2021), Issue 2

Competing Intellectual Currents within Modern Turkish Conservatism: The Bergsonian Connection


Authors:
ISSN-Print
2625-9842
ISSN-Online
2942-3155


Preview:

The philosophy of Henri Bergson (1859-1941) emerged during a critical juncture of European history as a reaction to the predominance of Enlightenment rationalism and positivism. Essentially, it strived to contest the peculiar convictions of these intellectual traditions and reintroduce the primacy of creativity, transcendence and human agency. As such, its influence had travelled across time and place. In modern Turkey, the thought of Bergson particularly influenced a group of conservative literati including İsmail Hakkı Baltacıoğlu (1886-1978), Peyami Safa (1899-1961), Hilmi Ziya Ülken (1901-1974) and Mustafa Şekip Tunç (1886-1958). For these intellectuals, Bergson represented the face of the ‘Other West’ and they appropriated his ideas with the aim of transforming the starkly positivist and rationalist disposition of Kemalism while being firmly committed to the ideals of the Modern Turkish Republic. On a different side of Turkey’s intellectual spectrum, another figure also appealed to Bergson and his philosophy. It was Necip Fazıl Kısakürek (1904-1983), who fiercely dissented the project of the republic for its pro-Western foundations and reconceptualized Islam as a totalizing ideology. Hence, through a critical cross-reading of different primary and secondary sources, the present article contrasts these competing currents of Turkish conservatism, their appropriations of Bergsonian philosophy and attitudes toward their society’s experience of the Turkish revolution and modernity.

Bibliography


  1. Adamson, Walter L. 1992. ‘The Language of Opposition in Early Twentieth-Century Italy: Rhetorical Continuities between Prewar Florentine Avant-Gardism and Mussolini’s Fascism’. The Journal of Modern History. 64.1. 22-51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  2. Ansell-Pearson, Keith. 2018. Bergson: Thinking Beyond the Human Condition. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  3. Antliff, Mark. 1993. Inventing Bergson: Cultural Politics and the Parisian Avant-Garde. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  4. Aslan, İlker. 2020. ‘1930’lar Türkiye’sinin Kültürel Haraketlerine Genel Bir Bakış: Necip Fazıl Kısakürek ve Ağaç Dergisi Örneği’. İmgelem Dergisi. 4.6. 107-130. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  5. Azouvi, François. 2007. La gloire de Bergson: Essai sur le magistère philosophique. Paris: Gallimard. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  6. Baldwin, Thomas (ed.). 2003. The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  7. Baltacıoğlu, İsmail Hakkı. 1337/[1921]. ‘Kerbelaya Giden Derviş’. Dergâh. I.1. 2-3. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  8. Bayraktar, Levent. 1998. ‘Bergsonculuğun Türkiye’ye Girişi ve İlk Temsilcileri’. Felsefe Dünyası. 28. 62-72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  9. Bergson, Henri. 1920. Mind-Energy: Lectures and Essays. New York: Henry Holt. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  10. Bergson, Henri. 1935. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. London: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  11. Bergson, Henri. 1944. Creative Evolution. New York: Random House. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  12. Bergson, Henri. 1946. The Creative Mind. New York: Philosophical Library. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  13. Bergson, Henri. 1947. Yaratıcı Tekamül. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  14. Bergson, Henri. 1959. Écrits et Paroles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  15. Berkes, Niyazi. 1954. ‘Ziya Gökalp: His Contribution to Turkish Nationalism’. The Middle East Journal. 8.4. 375-390. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  16. Çınar, Metin. 2003. ‘Dergâh Dergisi’. Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat (eds.). Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Muhafazakârlık’. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 85-91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  17. Duran, Burhanettin. 2015. ‘Necip Fazıl Kısakürek’te Tek Parti ve Kemalizm Eleştrisi’. Öz, Asım, Kara, İsmail and Ertuğrul, Aykut (eds.). Necip Fazıl Kitabı. İstanbul: Zeytinburnu Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  18. Fardid, Ahmad. 1316 [1938]. ‘Hanry Bergson va Falsafe-ye Bergsoni: I’. Majalle-ye Mehr (I). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  19. Fardid, Ahmad. 1316 [1938]. ‘Hanry Bergson va Falsafe-ye Bergsoni: II’. Majalle-ye Mehr (II). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  20. Fujita, Hisashi. 2012. ‘Anarchy and Analogy: The Violence of Language in Bergson and Sorel’. In Lefebvre, Alexandre and White, Melanie (eds.). Bergson, Politics, and Religion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 126-143. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  21. Gallagher, Idella J. 1970. Morality in Evolution: The Moral Philosophy of Henri Bergson. Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  22. Guida, Michelangelo. 2014. ‘Nurettin Topçu and Necip Fazıl Kısakürek: Stories of ‘Conversion’ and Activism in Republican Turkey’. Journal for Islamic Studies. 34.1. 98-117. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  23. Güzel, Murat. 2003. ‘Necip Fazıl Kısakürek’. Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat (eds.). Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Muhafazakârlık’. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 334-345. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  24. Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü. 1995. The Young Turks in Opposition. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  25. Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü. 2008. A Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  26. Heyd, Uriel. 1950. Foundations of Turkish Nationalism: The Life and Teachings of Ziya Gökalp. London: Luzac & Company and Harvill Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  27. Howard, Douglas A. 2017. A History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  28. İrem, Nazım. 1999. ‘Muhafazakâr Modernlik, Diğer Batı ve Türkiye’de Bergsonculuk’. Toplum ve Bilim. 82. 141-179. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  29. İrem, Nazım. 2002. ‘Turkish Conservative Modernism: Birth of Nationalist Quest for Cultural Renewal’. International Journal of Middle East Studies. 34.1. 87-112. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  30. İrem, Nazım. 2004. ‘Undercurrents of European Modernity and the Foundations of Modern Turkish Conservatism: Bergsonism in Retrospect’. Middle Eastern Studies. 40.4. 79-112. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  31. İrem, Nazım. 2011. ‘Bergson and Politics: Ottoman-Turkish Encounters with Innovation’. The European Legacy. 16.7. 873-882. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  32. İrem, Nazım. 2014. ‘Cumhuriyetçi Muhafazakarlık, Seferber Edici Modernlik ve Diğer Batı Düşüncesi’. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2.57. 41-60. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  33. Kadıoğlu, Ayşe. 1996. ‘The Paradox of Turkish Nationalism and the Construction of Official Identity’. Middle Eastern Studies. 32.2. 177-193. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  34. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 1973. İdeolocya Örgüsü. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  35. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 1982. Batı Tefekkürü ve İslam Tasavvufu. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  36. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 1984. Batı Tefekkürü ve İslam Tasavvufu. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  37. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 1992. Sahte Kahramanlar. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  38. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 2002. İdeolocya Örgüsü. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  39. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 2010. O ve Ben. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  40. Kıvılcımlı, Hikmet. 2008. Bergsonizm: Göçen Sermaye Dervişliği. İstanbul: Sosyal İnsan Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  41. Lefebvre, Alexandre and White, Melanie. 2020. ‘Bergson and Social Theory’. In Lefebvre, Alexandre and Schott, Nils F (eds.). Interpreting Bergson: Critical Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press. 139-154. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  42. Mardin, Şerif. 1992. Jön Türklerin Siyasi Fikirleri. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  43. Mardin, Şerif. 1999. Religion, Society and Modernity in Turkey. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  44. Mirsepassi, Ali. 2017. Transnationalism in Iranian Political Thought: The Life and Times of Ahmad Fardid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  45. Miyasoğlu, Mustafa. 1999. Necip Fazıl Kısakürek. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  46. Okay, Orhan. 1987. Necip Fazıl Kısakürek. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  47. Özdenören, Rasim. 2004. ‘Necip Fazıl Kısakürek’. Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat (eds.). Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: İslamcılık’. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 136-156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  48. Reardon, Bernard M.G. 1989. ‘Ernest Renan and the Religion of Science’. In Jasper, David and Wright, T.R. (eds.). The Critical Spirit and the Will to Believe: Essays in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Religion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 191-205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  49. Robinet, André (ed.). 1972. Mélanges. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  50. Safa, Peyami. 1953. ‘Türk Düşüncesi ve Batı Medeniyeti’. Türk Düşüncesi Dergisi. 1.1. 4-9. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  51. Safa, Peyami. 2019. Türk İnkılâbına Bakışlar. İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  52. Sarmış, Dilek. 2009. ‘Cumhuriyet öncesi Fikir Hareketlerinde Bergsonculuğun yeri ve yayılması’. Toplumsal Tarih. 192. 66-74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  53. Sarmış, Dilek. 2014. ‘L’essor du bergsonisme en Turquie: une lecture de la guerre d’indépendance à travers la revue Dergâh (1921-1923)’. Işiksel, Güneş et Szurek, Emmanuel (éds.). Turcs et Français. Une histoire culturelle, 1860-1960. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. 115-132. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  54. Sarmış, Dilek. 2016. La pensée de Bergson dans la genèse de la Turquie moderne. Un prisme des transitions lexicales, institutionnelles et politiques de la fin de l’Empire ottoman à la Turquie républicaine. PhD Dissertation. EHESS, Paris. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  55. Sarmış, Dilek. 2019. ‘Psychologies ottomanes et turques. Un laboratoire pour les partages savants’. Revue d’histoire des sciences humaines et sociales. 34. 34-66. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  56. Sarmış, Dilek. 2020. ‘Variations bergsoniennes dans les écritures intellectuelles et littéraires turques’. François, Arnaud et Riquier, Camille (éds.). Annales bergsoniennes IX – Bergson et les écrivains. Paris: PUF. 155-175. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  57. Shaw, Stanford J. and Shaw, Ezel Kural. 2002. History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  58. Sinclair, Mark. 2016. ‘Bergson’s Philosophy of Will and the War of 1914-1918’. Journal of the History of Ideas.77.3. 467-487. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  59. Sinclair, Mark. 2020. Bergson. New York, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  60. Sorel, Georges. 1908. Réflexions sur la violence. Paris: Marcel Rivière. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  61. Taglia, Stefano. 2017. Intellectuals and Reform in the Ottoman Empire: The Young Turks on the challenges of modernity. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  62. Tekin, Arslan and İzgöer, Ahmet Zeki (eds.) 2014. Dergâh Giriş-Çeviriyazı-Dizin I.Cilt. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  63. Ter Schure, Leon. 2019. Bergson and History: Transforming the Modern Regime of Historicity. Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  64. Törenek, Mehmet. 2012. ‘Peyami Safa ve Türk Düşüncesi Dergisi’. Erdem Dergisi. 62. 237-249. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  65. Tunç, Mustafa Şekip. 1337/ [1921]. ‘Hakiki Hürriyet’. Dergâh. I.3. 39. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  66. Tunç, Mustafa Şekip. 1958. ‘Descartes Kongresine Hitab’. Bilgi Dergisi. XI. 132. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  67. Turnaoğlu, Banu. 2017. The Formation of Turkish Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  68. Uçman, Abdullah. (n.d.). “Dergâh”. TDV Encyclopedia of Islam. URL. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/dergah--dergi (accessed 04.03.2021). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  69. Ülken, Hilmi Ziya. 1992. Türkiye’de Çağdaş Düşünce Tarihi. İstanbul: Ülken Yayınları. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  70. Yılmaz, Murat. 2003. ‘Türk Düşüncesi Dergisi’. Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat (eds.). Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Muhafazakârlık’. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 216-219. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  71. Zürcher, Erik J. 2004. Turkey: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex