The dialectic of civilisation: Norbert Elias, the triad of controls, and social- ecological transformation

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2
Open Access Vollzugriff

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Erscheinungsjahr
2025
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2

The dialectic of civilisation: Norbert Elias, the triad of controls, and social- ecological transformation

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Adamczak, B. (2017). Beziehungsweise Revolution: 1917, 1968 und kommende. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Anders, K. (2000). Die unvermeidliche Universalgeschichte. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Arora, S., Dyck, B. V., Sharma, D., & Stirling, A. (2020). Control, care, and conviviality in the politics of technology for sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1816687 Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Asara, V. (2015). Democracy without growth: The political ecology of the Indignados movement [PhD thesis]. Universitat Autònoma. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Asara, V., Profumi, E., & Kallis, G. (2013). Degrowth, democracy and autonomy. Environmental Values, 22(2), 217–239. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Barca, S. (2014). Laboring the Earth: Transnational Reflections on the Environmental History of Work. Environmental History, 19(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emt099 Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Baumgart, R., & Eichener, V. (2017). Norbert Elias zur Einführung. Junius Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Bello, W. (2005). Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy. Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B. (2016). The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. Verso. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Borowy, I., & Schmelzer, M. (Eds.). (2017). History of the Future of Economic Growth. Historical roots of current debates on sustainable degrowth. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Brand, U., Muraca, B., Pineault, É., Sahakian, M., Schaffartzik, A., Novy, A., Streissler, C., Haberl, H., Asara, V., Dietz, K., Lang, M., Kothari, A., Smith, T., Spash, C., Brad, A., Pichler, M., Plank, C., Velegrakis, G., Jahn, T., … Görg, C. (2021). From planetary to societal boundaries: An argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754 Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Brand, U., & Wissen, M. (2024). Kapitalismus am Limit: Öko-imperiale Spannungen, umkämpfte Krisenpolitik und solidarische Perspektiven. oekom verlag GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Büttner, M., & Schmelzer, M. (2021). Fossile Mentalitäten. Zur Geschichte der fossilen Durchdringung moderner Vorstellungswelten. Working Paper Nr. 3, Mentalitäten Im Fluss (Flumen), Jena. https://www.flumen.uni-jena.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Working-Paper-Nr.-3_Schmelzer-und-Buettner_Fossile-Mentalitaeten-Zur-Geschichte-der-fossilen-Durchdringung-moderner-Vorstellungswelten-1.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Caffentzis, G. (2013). In Letters of Blood and Fire: Work, Machines, and the Crisis of Capitalism. PM Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. Anthem Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Dale, G. (2012). The growth paradigm: A critique. International Socialism, 134. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Dörre, K., Lessenich, S., & Rosa, H. (2009). Soziologie—Kapitalismus – Kritik: eine Debatte. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Duerr, H. P. (1988). Der Mythos vom Zivilisationsprozeß: Band 1: Nacktheit und Scham. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Duerr, H. P. (2005). Der Mythos vom Zivilisationsprozeß: Band 5: Die Tatsachen des Lebens. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Durand, C., Hofferberth, E., & Schmelzer, M. (2024). Planning beyond growth: The case for economic democracy within ecological limits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140351 Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Eastwood, L., & Heron, K. (Eds.). (2024). De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth. In De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth. De Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Elias, N. (1971). Sociology of Knowledge: New Perspectives, Part 2. Sociology, 5(3), 355–370. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Elias, N. (1992). Zivilisation. In B. Schäfers (Ed.), Grundbegriffe der Soziologie (pp. 382–387). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14856-2_142 Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Elias, N. (1997a). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Wandlungen des Verhaltens in den westlichen Oberschichten des Abendlandes. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Elias, N. (1997b). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Wandlungen der Gesellschaft. Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Elias, N. (2001). The Society of Individuals. Continuum. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Elias, N. (2003). Engagement und Distanzierung. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Elias, N. (2006). Gesammelte Schriften in 19 Bänden: Band 5: Was ist Soziologie? (A. Treibel, Ed.). Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Elias, N. (1989). Studien über die Deutschen: Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Elias, N., & Steenhuis, A. (1984). We still haven’t learnt to control nature and ourselves enough. Interview with Aafke Stenhuis. http://www.kuwi.uni-linz.ac.at/hyperelias/z-elias/abstracts/FullText-eng-1996-T-eng-2.htm Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2017). Mehr als Weniger: Erste Überlegungen zur Frage nach dem Postwachstumssubjekt. Psychosozial, 40(2), 83–100. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2019). Degrowth und Männlichkeiten – Zur Geschlechtlichkeit des relationalen Postwachstumssubjekts. In A. Heilmann & S. Scholz (Eds.), Caring Masculinities? Auf der Suche nach Transformationswegen in eine demokratische Postwachstumsgesellschaft (pp. 173–184). oekom. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2023). Degrowth and Masculinities: Towards a gendered understanding of degrowth subjectivities. Degrowth Journal, 1. https://www.degrowthjournal.org/publications/2023-04-26-degrowth-and-masculinities-towards-a-gendered-understanding-of-degrowth-subjectivities/ Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Fioramonti, L. (2013). Gross Domestic Problem: The Politics Behind the World’s Most Powerful Number. Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Fressoz, J.-B. (2024). More and More and More: An All-Consuming History of Energy (1st ed.). Allen Lane. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Freud, S. (2010). Civilization and Its Discontents. W. W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Ghosh, A. (2021). The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Görg, C. (1999). Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse. Westfälisches Dampfboot. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Goudsblom, J. (1995). Fire And Civilization. Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Graeber, D. (2019). Bullshit Jobs: The Rise of Pointless Work, and What We Can Do About It (1st ed.). Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Groos, J., & Sorg, C. (2025). Creative Construction: Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond. Bristol University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Hamilton, C. (2016). The Theodicy of the “Good Anthropocene.” Environmental Humanities, 7(1), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3616434 Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Hickel, J. (2017). The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions. Cornerstone Digital. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Hobson, J. M. (2017). A critical-sympathetic introduction to Linklater’s odyssey: Bridge over troubled (Eurocentric?) water. Review of International Studies, 43(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000250 Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Hofferberth, E., Schmelzer, M., & Durand, C. (2025). Planned Degrowth: Macroeconomic Coordination for Sustainable Degrowth. In J. Groos & C. Sorg (Eds.), Creative Construction: Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond (pp. 247–264). Bristol University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2006). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente (16th ed.). Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Hornborg, A. (2016). Global Magic: Technologies of Appropriation from Ancient Rome to Wall Street. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Hughes, J. G. (2013). Drawing Elias – Sketches from Four Interviews. Human Figurations, 2(2). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0002.207 Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Hummel, D., Jahn, T., Kramm, J., & Stieß, I. (2024). Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse – Grundbegriff und Denkraum für die Gestaltung von sozial-ökologischen Transformationen. In M. Sonnberger, A. Bleicher, & M. Groß (Eds.), Handbuch Umweltsoziologie (pp. 15–29). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37218-7_1 Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality. Harper & Row. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. 10.59327/IPCC/AR6–9789291691647 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Jackson, T. (2025). The Care Economy. Polity. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Kallis, G. (2019). Limits: Why Malthus Was Wrong and Why Environmentalists Should Care. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025). Post-growth: The science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(1), e62–e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00310-3 Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on Degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 291–316. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Kallis, G., Paulson, S., D’Alisa, G., & Demaria, F. (2020). The Case for Degrowth. Polity. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Kemp, L., Xu, C., Depledge, J., Ebi, K. L., Gibbins, G., Kohler, T. A., Rockström, J., Scheffer, M., Schellnhuber, H. J., Steffen, W., & Lenton, T. M. (2022). Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(34), e2108146119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119 Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L., & Ehlers, M.-H. (2018). Degrowth and Technology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1619–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147 Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Keyßer, L., Steinberger, J., & Schmelzer, M. (2025). Economic growth dependencies and imperatives: A review of key theories and their conflicts. Ecological Economics, 238, 108745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108745 Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Kilminster, R. (2007). Norbert Elias: Post-Philosophical Sociology. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Kimmerer, R. W. (2020). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Komlosy, A. (2014). Arbeit: Eine globalhistorische Perspektive. 13. bis 21. Jahrhundert. Promedia. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (Eds.). (2019). Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary. Authors Up Front. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Lepenies, P. (2013). Die Macht der einen Zahl. Eine politische Geschichte des Bruttoinlandsprodukts. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Liegey, V., Madelaine, S., Ondet, C., Veillot, A.-I., & Ariès, P. (2013). Un projet de décroissance. Manifeste pour une Dotation inconditionnelle d’autonomie. Les éditions Utopia. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Livingston, J. (2019). Self-Devouring Growth: A Planetary Parable as Told from Southern Africa. Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Malm, A. (2016). Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. Verso. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Mennell, S. (1996). Civilizing and Decivilizing Processes. In The Course of Human History: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Mennell, S. (1998). Norbert Elias: An Introduction. University College Dublin Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Merchant, C. (1983). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. Harper & Row. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. E. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Mitchell, T. (2014). Economentality: How the Future Entered Government. Critical Inquiry, 40(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.1086/676417 Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Nelson, A. (Ed.). (2025). Routledge Handbook of Degrowth. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Nia, E. M. (2003). Zum Begriff des Fortschritts bei Norbert Elias. Shaker. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Nixon, R. (2013). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Oliveira, V. M. de. (2021). Hospicing Modernity: Facing Humanity’s Wrongs and the Implications for Social Activism. North Atlantic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 88(95), 88–95. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Osterhammel, J. (2009). Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts / Jürgen Osterhammel. Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Parrique, T. (2022). Ralentir ou périr: L’économie de la décroissance. SEUIL. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Pineault, E. (2023). A Social Ecology of Capital. Pluto. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Quilley, S. (2013). De-Growth Is Not a Liberal Agenda: Relocalisation and the Limits to Low Energy Cosmopolitanism. Environmental Values, 22(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725310 Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Quilley, S. (2020). Elias in the Anthropocene: Human Nature, Evolution and the Politics of the Great Acceleration (pp. 111–139). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_7 Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Quilley, S., & Loyal, S. (2005). Eliasian Sociology as a ‘Central Theory’ for the Human Sciences. Current Sociology, 53(5), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392105055021 Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Radkau, J. (2002). Natur und Macht: Eine Weltgeschichte der Umwelt. C.H. Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Gregg, J. W., Rockström, J., Mann, M. E., Oreskes, N., Lenton, T. M., Rahmstorf, S., Newsome, T. M., Xu, C., Svenning, J.-C., Pereira, C. C., Law, B. E., & Crowther, T. W. (2024). The 2024 state of the climate report: Perilous times on planet Earth. BioScience, biae087. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae087 Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Rosa, H. (2013). Beschleunigung und Entfremdung: Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Salleh, A. (2017). Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx, and the Postmodern. Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Saramago, A. (2023). Dualism and Anti-Dualism in the Anthropocene: Process Sociology and Human/Nature Relations in the Great Evolution. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 48(1), 190–212. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Scheidler, F. (2020). The End of the Megamachine: A Brief History of a Failing Civilization. Zero Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Schmelzer, M. (2015a). ‘Expandiere oder stirb.’ Wachstumsziele, die OECD und die Steigerungslogik wirtschaftlicher Expansion. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 41(3), 355–393. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Schmelzer, M. (2015b). The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship. Ecological Economics, 118, 262–271. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Schmelzer, M. (2016). The Hegemony of Growth. The OECD and the Making of the Economic Growth Paradigm. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Schmelzer, M. (2024). ‘Without Growth, Everything is Nothing’: On the Origins of Growthism. In L. Eastwood & K. Heron (Eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth (pp. 26–40). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110778359 Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Schmelzer, M., & Büttner, M. (2024). Fossil mentalities: How fossil fuels have shaped social imaginaries. Geoforum, 150, 103981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.103981 Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Schmelzer, M., & Hofferberth, E. (2023). Democratic Planning for Degrowth. Monthly Review, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-075-03-2023-07_10 Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Schmelzer, M., & Nowshin, T. (2023). Ecological Reparations and Degrowth: Towards a Convergence of Alternatives Around World-making After Growth. Development, 66, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-023-00360-9 Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Schmelzer, M., Vetter, A., & Vansintjan, A. (2022). The Future is Degrowth: A Guide to a World Beyond Capitalism. Verso. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Schröter, M., & Elias, N. (2004). Gesammelte Schriften in 19 Bänden: Band 9: Über die Zeit. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Sommer, B., & Welzer, H. (2014). Transformationsdesign. Wege in eine zukunftsfähige Moderne. Oekom. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Stay Grounded. (2019). Degrowth of Aviation: Reducing Air Travel in a Just Way. Stay Grounded. https://stay-grounded.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Degrowth-Of-Aviation_2019.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Szeman, I., & Boyer, D. (2017). Energy Humanities: An Anthology. JHU Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. Vintage. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Treibel, A. (2008). Die Soziologie von Norbert Elias: Eine Einführung in Ihre Geschichte, Systematik und Perspektiven. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. van Krieken, R. (1999). The barbarism of civilization: Cultural genocide and the ‘stolen generations’1. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00297.x Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Van Krieken, R. (2001). Norbert Elias and Process Sociology. In G. Ritzer & B. Smart, Handbook of Social Theory (pp. 353–368). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608351.n27 Google Scholar öffnen
  109. van Krieken, R. (2024). The Age of Anger and Social Media: Elias, Technology, Civilizing/Decivilizing Processes and Ressentiment. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(7–8), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241299767 Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Vetter, A. (2023). Konviviale Technik: Empirische Technikethik für eine Postwachstumsgesellschaft. transcript. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Vogel, J., & Hickel, J. (2023). Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO2–GDP decoupling in high-income countries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(9), e759–e769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00174-2 Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Vries, B. D., & Goudsblom, J. (Eds.). (2002). Mappae Mundi: Humans and Their Habitats in a Long-Term Socio-Ecological Perspective : Myths, Maps and Models. Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Weber, M. (1920). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. In M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie (pp. 1–206). J.C.B. Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Welzer, H. (2011). Mentale Infrastrukturen: Wie das Wachstum in die Welt und in die Seelen kam (Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Ed.). Heinrich Böll Stiftung. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Wouters, C. (2014). Universally applicable criteria for doing figurational process sociology: Seven balances, one triad. Human Figurations, 3(1). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0003.106 Google Scholar öffnen

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien