Figurations of socio-ecological decline: The climate crisis as a process of de- civilisation

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2
Open Access Vollzugriff

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2

Figurations of socio-ecological decline: The climate crisis as a process of de- civilisation

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Dunlap, R.E. & Michelson, W., Eds., (2001). Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  2. Elias, N. (2000 1976). On the Process of Civilisation. Dublin: University College Dublin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  3. Elias, N. (2007 [1993]). Involvement and Detachment. Dublin: University College Dublin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  4. Elias, N. (2012a [1978]). What is Sociology? Dublin: University College Dublin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  5. Goudsblom, J. (1992). Fire and Civilization. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  6. Latour, B. & Schultz, N. (2023). On the Emergence of an Ecological Class. A Memo, Oxford, UK: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  7. Quilley, S. (2011). Entropy, the Anthroposphere and the Ecology of Civilization: An Essay on the Problem of ‘Liberalism in One Village’ in the Long View. The Sociological Review, 59, 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.01979.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  8. Rohloff, A. (2018). Climate Change, Moral Panics and Civilization. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  9. Sommer, B. & von Querfurth, S. (2025). „Wäre mir dieses ganze Thema rund um das Klima egal, dann würde ich hier auch in Technik schwimmen.“ Zum Verhalten und Empfinden junger Klimaaktivisti. In S. Ernst, A. Jitschin & V. Dahl (Eds.), Zur Transformation sozialer Kanons. Texte zu Norbert Elias (56–74). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-129
  10. Blok, A. (2023). Anmeldelse af Bruno Latour & Nikolaj Schultz: Notat om den nye økologiske klasse. Dansk Sociologi, Årgang 34, Nr. 2, 134–136. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-140
  11. Elias, N. (1997). The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford, UK: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-140
  12. Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process. Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-140
  13. Karsenti, B. (2024). Nous Autres Européens. Dialogue philosophique avec Bruno Latour, Paris: Éditions PUF. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-140
  14. Krøijer, S., Kolling, M. & Sen, A. (2021). Ruins and Rhythms of Life and Development after Progress. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 86, Issue 5, 877–896. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-140
  15. Latour, B. & Schultz, N. (2023). On the Emergence of an Ecological Class. A Memo. Oxford, UK: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-140
  16. Latour, B. (2021). Comment penser la suite de l’aventure moderne?, Retrieved from: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/175-PERELMAN_0.pdf (last accessed: 25, November 25). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-140
  17. Battistoni, A. & Britton-Purdy, J. (2020). After Carbon Democracy. Dissent, 67(1), 51–60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  18. Beckert, J. (2025). How We Sold Our Future: The Failure to Fight Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  19. Blühdorn, I. (2022). Post-Democracy and Post-Sustainability. In B. Bornemann et al. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Democracy and Sustainability. London: Routledge, 476–494. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  20. Brownhill, L. et al. (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge Handbook on Ecosocialism. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  21. BVerfG (2021). Order of the First Senate of 24 March 2021. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2021/03/rs20210324_1bvr265618en.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  22. Christophers, B. (2022). Fossilised Capital: Price and Profit in the Energy Transition. New Political Economy, 27(1), 146–159. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  23. Climate, Climatic Change, and Society (CLICCS) (2023). Fossile CO2-Emissionen erreichen neues Rekordhoch. December 5. https://www.cliccs.uni-hamburg.de/de/about-cliccs/news/2023-news/2023-12-05-global-carbon-ilyina.html. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  24. Der Standard (2021, March 2). Heute vor 20 Jahren: Zukunftsforscher prophezeien Ende des Internetbooms. https://www.derstandard.de/story/2000124571379/heute-vor-20-jahren-zukunftsforscherprophezeien-ende-des-internet-booms. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  25. Elias, N. (1977). Zur Grundlegung einer Theorie sozialer Prozesse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 6(2), 127–149. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  26. Elias, N. (2006a). Figuration. In B. Schäfers & J. Knopp (Eds.), Grundbegriffe der Soziologie. 9th Revised and Updated Edition. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 73–76. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  27. Elias, N. (2006b). Figuration, sozialer Prozeß und Zivilisation: Grundbegriffe der Soziologie. In N. Elias, Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 16: Aufsätze und andere Schriften III. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  28. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2023). Treibhausgasemissionen in der EU. https://www.eea.europa.eu/de/highlights/die-treibhausgasemissionen-in-der-eu Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  29. Forman, E. et al. (2020). The Municipalist Moment. Dissent, 67(1). https://dissentmagazine.org/article/the-municipalist-moment/. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  30. Friedlingstein, P. et al. (2022). Global Carbon Budget 2022. Earth System Science Data, 14(11), 4811–4900. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  31. Hirschman, A. O. (1973). The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023). Climate Change 2023. Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Summary for Policymakers). Geneva. Doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6–9789291691647.001. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  33. Kemp, L. et al. (2022). Climate Endgame: Exploring Catastrophic Climate Change Scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 119(34). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  34. Kemp, L. (2025). Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse. London: Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  35. Kraushaar, W. (2008). Achtundsechzig. Eine Bilanz. Berlin: Propyläen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  36. Merkel, W. (2010). Systemtransformation. Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  37. Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life. Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  38. Offe, C. (1991). Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central. Social Research, 58(4), 865–892. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  39. Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  40. Republik (2025): Erfolgreich gescheitert. Kopenhagen und sein Klimaziel. https://www.republik.ch/2025/05/21/erfolgreich-gescheitert. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  41. Ripple, W. J. et al. (2024). The 2024 State of the Climate Report: Perilous Times on Planet Earth. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae087. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  42. Saito, K. (2024). Slow Down: The Degrowth Manifesto. London: Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  43. Schmelzer, M. et al. (2022). The Future is Degrowth. A Guide to a World beyond Capitalism. London: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  44. Statista (2025a). USA: Entwicklung der CO2-Emissionen von 1960 bis 2023. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1382237/umfrage/entwicklung-der-co2-emissionen-in-den-usa/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  45. Statista (2025b). Treibhausgasemissionen in Deutschland nach Sektoren. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1241046/umfrage/treibhausgasemissionen-in-deutschland-nach-sektor. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  46. Weber, M. (1988 [1920]). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-144
  47. Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa. (2024): Średnia powierzchnia gospodarstwa rolnego w Polsce w 2024 roku. https://www.gov.pl/web/arimr/srednia-powierzchnia-gruntow-rolnych-w-gospodarstwie-w-2024-roku. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  48. Aguilar-Gómez, S., & Salazar-Díaz, A. (2025). Droughts and domestic violence: Measuring the gender-climate nexus (IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-1653). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  49. Alston, M. (1997). Violence against women in a rural context. Australian Social Work, 50(1), 15–22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  50. Alston, M. (2012). Rural male suicide in Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 74(4), 515–522. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  51. Alston, M., & Kent, J. (2008). The Big Dry: The link between rural masculinities and poor health outcomes for farming men. Journal of Sociology, 44(2), 133–147. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  52. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  53. Bukraba-Rylska, I. (2008). Socjologia wsi polskiej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  54. Dehingia, N., McDougal, L., Silverman, J. G., Reed, E., Urada, L., McAuley, J.,... & Raj, A. (2024). Climate and gender: Association between droughts and intimate partner violence in India. American Journal of Epidemiology, 193(4), 636–645. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  55. Dickinson, J.L. (2009). The People Paradox: Self-Esteem Striving, Immortality Ideologies, and Human Response to Climate Change. Ecology & Society, 14(1). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  56. Drąg, Z., & Gorlach, K. (2019). Polskie rolniczki jako menedżerki. Studia Socjologiczne, 4 (235), 129–156. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  57. Dudek, M. (2016). Sukcesja indywidualnych gospodarstw rolnych jako czynnik przeobrażeń strukturalnych w polskim rolnictwie. Dział Wydawnictw IERiGŻ-PIB. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  58. Elias, N. (2007). Involvement and Detachment. Ireland: University College Dublin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  59. Eurostat. (2023). Farmers and the agricultural labour force – statistics. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Farmers_and_the_agricultural_labour_force_-_statistics (last accessed: 2025, October 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  60. Ghazi, B., Salehi, H., Przybylak, R., & Pospieszyńska, A. (2025). Projection of climate change impact on the occurrence of drought events in Poland. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 5609. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  61. Gorlach, K. (2000). Freedom for credit: Polish peasants protests in the era of communism and post-communism. Polish Sociological Review, (129), 57–85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  62. Höijer, B. (2010). Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public understanding of science, 19(6), 717–731. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  63. Jones, R. (2018). Uncertainty and the emotional landscape of drought. International Review of Environmental History, 4(2), 13–26. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  64. Lawrence, M., Homer-Dixon, T., Janzwood, S., Rockstöm, J., Renn, O., & Donges, J. F. (2024). Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability, 7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  65. Loyal, S., & Quilley, S. (2005). Eliasian Sociology as a ‘Central Theory’ for the Human Sciences. Current Sociology, 35(5), 807–828. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  66. Morin, E., & Kern, A. B. (1999). Homeland earth: A manifesto for the new millenium. Hampton Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  67. Mosberg, M., & Eriksen, S. H. (2015). Responding to climate variability and change in dryland Kenya: The role of illicit coping strategies in the politics of adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 545–557. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  68. Nicholas, J. (2025, September 17). Ground zero: Rain-starved southern Australia is grappling with one of the worst droughts in memory. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2025/sep/17/southern-australia-one-of-worst-droughts-recent-memory-rain-starved (last accessed: 2025, October 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  69. Raedecke, A-L., Lamine, C., & Olsson, J. (2003). Habitus and the Field of Agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 43(1), 67–86. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  70. Rutledge‐Prior, S., & Beggs, R. (2021). Of droughts and fleeting rains: Drought, agriculture and media discourse in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 67(1), 106–129. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  71. Somorowska, U. (2009). Increase in the hydrological drought risk in different geographical regions of Poland in the 20th century. Prace i Studia Geograficzne, 43, 97–114. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  72. Sutherland L-A. & Darnhofer, I. (2012). Of Organic Farmers and ‘Good Farmers’: Changing Habitus in Rural England. Sociologia Ruralis 52(2), 231–247. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  73. Toreti, A., Bavera, D., Acosta Navarro, J., Acquafresca, L., Barbosa, P., de Jager, A., Ficchi, A., Fioravanti, G., Grimaldi, S., Hrast Essenflelder, A., Magni, D., Mazzeschi, M., McCormick, N., Mouti, S., Otieno, V., Salamon, P., Nunes Santos, S., & Volpi, D. (2025). Drought in Africa – April 2025. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/2135988, JRC142074. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  74. Williamson, F., & Courtney, C. (2018). Disasters fast and slow: The temporality of hazards in environmental history. International Review of Environmental History, 4(2), 5–11. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-158
  75. Abrahamse, W. (2019). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: What works, what doesn’t, and why. Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  76. Bowen P., van Heerikhuizen B. & Emirbayer M. (2012). Elias and Bourdieu. Journal of Classical Sociology, 12, 69–93. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  77. Buccarelli, F. (2011). Fra sociogenesi e psicogenesi: Il “lato oscuro" dell’habitus sociale. Cambio. Rivista sulle trasformazioni sociali, 1(2), 75–88. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  78. Bucholc, M. (Ed.). (2024). Established-outsiders Relations in Poland: Reconfiguring Elias and Scotson. Springer Nature. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  79. Camic, C. (1986). The matter of habit. American journal of sociology, 91(5), 1039–1087. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  80. Corchia L. (2020), La teoria bourdieusiana dell’habitus. Pensare con e contro Durkheim. «Lo Sguardo – rivista di filosofia, 31(2), 99–123. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  81. Déchaux J.H. (1993). N. Elias et P. Bourdieu analyse conceptuelle comparée. Archives européennes de sociologie, 34 (2), 364–385 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  82. Dendasck C. V., Lopes G.F. (2016). Conceito de Habitus em Pierre Bourdieu e Norbert Elias. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do conhecimento. 3 (5), 01–10 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  83. Dietz, T. (2014). “Understanding Environmentally Significant Consumption.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 14: 5067–5068. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  84. Elias, N. (1939/2012). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [The Civilising Process, Collected Works, vol. 3, UCD Press]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  85. Elias, N. (1969/2006). Die höfische Gesellschaft: Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Königtums und der höfischen Aristokratie mit einer Einleitung: Soziologie und Geschichtswissenschaft. Neuwied: Luchterhand.[The Court Society, Collected Works, vol. 2, UCD Press] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  86. Elias, N. (1987/2009). On Human Beings and Their Emotions: A Process-Sociological Essay. Theory, Culture & Society, 4(2–3), 339–361. [in Essay III, Collected Works, vol. 16, pp. 141–158]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  87. Elias, N. (1987/2010). Die Gesellschaft der Individuen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, [The society of individuals, Collected Works, vol 10, UCD Press]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  88. Elias, N. (1984/2007). Über die Zeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Time: An essay Collected Works, vol 9, UCD Press]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  89. Elias, N. (1989/2013). Studien über die Deutschen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [The Germans: Power struggles and the development of habitus in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Collected Works, vol 11, UCD Press]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  90. Elias, N., & Scotson, J. L. (1965/2008). The Established and the Outsiders, London: Frank Cass & Co.] [Collected works, Vol. 9, UCD Press]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  91. Ernst, S., Weischer, C., & Alikhani, B. (2017). Changing power relations and the drag effects of habitus: Theoretical and empirical approaches in the twenty-first century. An introduction. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 7–21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  92. Feuerhahn W: (2009), Une sociologie des habitus nationaux: Norbert Elias et l’héritage de Heidelberg, Individu & nation, 3, DOI: 10.58335/individuetnation.167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  93. Freud, S. (1923). Das Ich und das Es. (Italian ed. L’Io e l’Es, 2010, Newton Compton: Rome). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  94. Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of consumer culture, 11(1), 79–99. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  95. Hertwich, E. G. & Peters, G. P. (2009). Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 16: 6414–6420. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  96. IPCC (2023): Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  97. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  98. Kuzmics, H. (2000). Nationaler Habitus und Handlungstheorie: Das Beispiel von Autoritaet und Selbstironie im österreichischen Charakter. In Zivilisationstheorie in der Bilanz: Beiträge zum 100. Geburtstag von Norbert Elias (pp. 221–242). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  99. Kuzmics, H., Reicher, D., & Hughes, J. (2020). State, emotion, authority, and national habitus: State-related problems of our time and methodological discourses in sociology and historical sociology. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 45(1), 7–41. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  100. Marasco V. & Perulli A. (forthcoming) Perché fatichiamo a cambiare rotta verso un futuro sostenibile? L’inerzia ecologica attraverso la sociologica figurazionale, in AA.VV. Questione ecologica e mutamento sociale: le sfide per la teoria sociologica, Morlacchi. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  101. Mennell, S. (2007). The American civilizing process. Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  102. Mennell, S., & Dunning, E. (1996). Preface. In N. Elias, The Germans (pp. vii–xvi). Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  103. Perulli, A. (2011). Beyond dichotomous thinking: The society of individuals. Cambio. Rivista sulle trasformazioni sociali, 1(1), 6–22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  104. Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(6), 1273–1285. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  105. Shove, E., Watson, M., & Pantzar, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  106. Sieczka, E. (2025). National Figurations under Hysteresis in Norbert Elias and Pierre Bourdieu: From Plural to Cleft National Habitus. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 31(1), 95–113. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  107. Sommer, B. (2011). Interdependenzen und Ungleichzeitigkeiten im Kontext des anthropogenen Klimawandels. Leviathan, 39(1), 55–72. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  108. Wacquant L. (2013). Homines in extremis: Che cosa gli studiosi lottatori ci insegnano sull’habitus. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 6(2), 169–182. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  109. Wacquant, L. (2016). A concise genealogy and anatomy of habitus. The sociological review, 64(1), 64–72. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-174
  110. Abellan, A. (2025). Performing the People: Affective and Discursive Strategies of Populist Proximity. Preprint. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6829941/v1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  111. Acemoglu, D. & J. A. Robinson (2019). The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. London etc.: Penguin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  112. Adamidis, V. (2021). Democracy, populism, and the rule of law: A reconsideration of their interconnectedness. Politics, 44(3), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211041444 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  113. Albert, G. (2013). Figuration und Emergenz. Zur Ontologie und Methodologie des Ansatzes von Norbert Elias. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 65(2), 193–222. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  114. Albrecht, G. A. (2019). Earth Emotions: New Words for a New World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  115. Alì, N. & Caranti, L. (2021). How much economic inequality is fair in liberal democracies? The approach of proportional justice. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(7), 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720987865. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  116. Anderson, E. N. (1996). Ecologies of the Heart. Emotion, Belief, and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  117. Archer, M. S. (Ed.) (2015). Generative Mechanisms Transforming the Social Order. Cham etc.: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  118. Arguedas, A. R., C. T. Robertson, R. Fletcher & R. K. Nielsen. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review. Oxford: Reuters Institute. DOI: 10.60625/risj-etxj-7k60. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/echo-chambers-filter-bubbles-and-polarisation-literature-review. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  119. Arnason, J. P. (2022). Civilisation, Culture and Power: Reflections on Norbert Elias’s Genealogy of the West. In A. Bogner & S. Mennell (Ed.), Civilisations, Civilising Processes and Modernity – A Debate. Palgrave Studies on Norbert Elias (175–201). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  120. Barker, K. (2025). Anaesthetic Worlds of Denial: ‘Sleepwalking’ Through Climate Change. In J. Glückler, M. Garschagen & R. Panitz (Ed.), Placing the Future (75–96). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  121. Beard, S. J. et al. (2021). Assessing climate change’s contribution to global catastrophic risk. Futures 127, 102673. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  122. Biermann, F. (2022). The future of ‘environmental’ policy in the Anthropocene: time for a paradigm shift. In G. Hayes et al. (Ed.), Trajectories in Environmental Politics (68–88). London: Routledge Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  123. Bingaman, K.A. (2022). The End of the World As We Have Known It? An Introduction to Collapsology. Pastoral Psychol, 71, 753–767. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-022-01026-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  125. Blümel, W.D. (2009). Natural Climatic Variations in the Holocene: Past Impacts on Cultural History, Human Welfare and Crisis. In H.G. Brauch et al. (Ed.), Facing Global Environmental Change. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, (103–118), vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68488-6_5. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  126. Böckenförde, W. (1976). Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit. Studien zur Staatstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  127. Bogner, A. (1989). Zivilisation und Rationalisierung. Die Zivilisationstheorien Max Webers, Norbert Elias' und der Frankfurter Schule im Vergleich. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  128. Böhnert, M., Hornisch, M. & Rink, A. (Ed.) (2025). Apokalypse und Apathie. Handlungs(un)fähigkeiten in der Klimakrise. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  129. Bösel, B. (2023). Die Plastizität der Gefühle. Das affektive Leben zwischen Psychotechnik und Ereignis. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  130. Bosetti, V., Colantone, I., De Vries, C.E. et al. (2025). Green backlash and right-wing populism. Nature Climate Change, 15, 822–828 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02384-0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  131. Bostrom, N. (2019). The vulnerable world hypothesis. Global Policy. 10, 455–476. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  132. Brand, U. et al. (2021). From planetary to societal boundaries: an argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 264–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  133. Buhaug, H. & Uexkuell, N. v. (2021). Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-014708. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  134. Buzogány, A. & Mohamad-Klotzbach, C. (2022). Environmental Populism. In M. Oswald (Ed.). The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. (321–340). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  135. Caiani, M. & Graziano, P. (2022). The Three Faces of Populism in Power: Polity, Policies and Politics. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 569–588. doi:10.1017/gov.2022.4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  136. Caiani, M. & Graziano, P. (Ed.) (2021). Varieties of Populism in Europe in Times of Crisis. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  137. Callahan, C.W. (2025). Present and future limits to climate change adaptation. Nature Sustainability, 8, 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01519-7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  138. Carrión, J. F. (2022). A Dynamic Theory of Populism in Power. The Andes in Comparative Perspective. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  139. Catlin, J. (2022). Bauman, the Frankfurt School, and the tradition of enlightened catastrophism. In J. Palmer & D. Brzeziński (Eds.). Revisiting Modernity and the Holocaust: Heritage, Dilemmas, Extensions (199–218). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120551 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  140. Chakrabarty, D. (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  141. Clark, N. (2020). (Un)Earthing Civilization: Holocene Climate Crisis, City-State Origins and the Birth of Writing. Humanities, 9 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9010001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  142. Clark, N. & Szerszynski, B. (2020). Planetary Social Thought: The Anthropocene Challenge to the Social Sciences. Cambridge etc.: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  143. Clausen, L. (1994). Krasser sozialer Wandel. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  144. Clayton, Susan (2020). Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  145. Clough, P. T. & Halley, J. (Eds.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  146. Colelli, F.P., Wing, I.S. & Cian, E.D. (2023). Air-conditioning adoption and electricity demand highlight climate change mitigation–adaptation tradeoffs. Scientific Reports 13, 4413. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31469-z. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  147. Cox, R. W. (2001). Globalization and Civilizations and the twenty-first century. Some theoretical considerations. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 1(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/1.1.105 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  148. Crawford, N. C. (2022). The Pentagon, Climate Change, and War. Charting the Rise and Fall of U.S. Military Emissions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  149. Dannemann, H. (2024). Populism and Anti-Populism in Climate Politics: Conflict Line, Contingent Relation, or Tacit Alliance in Climate Obstruction? Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVZ) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-024-00581-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  150. Davidson, J.P.L. (2023). Two cheers for collapse? On the uses and abuses of the societal collapse thesis for imagining Anthropocene futures. Environmental Politics, 32(6), 969–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2164238. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  151. Davis, L. et al. (2021). Air conditioning and global inequality. Global Environmental Change, 69, 102299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102299. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  152. Dépelteau, F., Passiani, E. & Mariano, R. (2013). Ariel or Caliban? The Civilizing Process and Its Critiques. In F. Dépelteau, T. S. Landini (Ed.), Norbert Elias and Social Theory (41–59). Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  153. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  154. Diehl, P. & Bargetz, B. (Eds.) (2024). The Complexity of Populism New Approaches and Methods. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  155. Dreier, R. (1991). Recht – Staat – Vernunft. Studien zur Rechtstheorie 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  156. Drucks, S. (2011). Normativität bei Norbert Elias. In J. Ahrend, R. Beer, U.H. Bittligmeier & J. Gerdes (Ed.), Normativität. Über die Hintergründe sozialwissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung (157–187). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  157. du Plessis, E. M. & Husted, E. (2024). Prepping as implicit activism: risk, danger, and post-capitalist imaginaries in prepper literature. Social Movement Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2024.2349568 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  158. Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.) (2002). Multiple Modernities. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  159. Ejsing, M. (2022). The arrival of the Anthropocene in social theory: From modernism and Marxism towards a new materialism. The Sociological Review, 71(1), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221106905. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  160. Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process. Malden & Victoria: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  161. Elias, N. (2001). The Society of Individuals. London & New York: Continuum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  162. Elias, N. (2013). Studies on the Germans. Dublin: University College Dublin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  163. Engels, A. et al. (2024). Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook 2024. Conditions for Sustainable Climate Change Adaptation. Bielefeld: Transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  164. Eslen-Zyia, H. & Giorgi, A. (Ed.) (2022). Populism and Science in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  165. Eversberg, D. et al. (2024). Der neue sozial-ökologische Klassenkonflikt. Mentalitäts- und Interessengegensätze im Streit um Transformation. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  166. Feenberg, A. (2011). The Liberation of Nature? In A. Biro (Ed.), Critical Ecologies. The Frankfurt School and Contemporary Environmental Crises (339–354). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  167. Flannery, F. (2024). Why We Must Stop Saying ‘Climate Apocalypse’: Symbols, Religious Social Memory, and Effective Climate Action. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 59(1), 195–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.11610. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  168. Fletcher, J. (1995). Towards a Theory of Decivilizing Processes. Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift, 22(2), 283–296. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  169. Frankenberg, G. & Heitmeyer, W. (Ed.) (2025). Autoritäre Treiber eines Systemwechsels. Zur Destabilisierung von Institutionen durch die AfD. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  170. Friedlingstein, P. at al. (2025). Global Carbon Budget 2024. Earth System Science Data, 17, 965–1039. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  171. Fuchs, T. (2024). Verkörperte Gefühle. Zur Phänomenologie von Affektivität und Interaffektivität. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  172. Gaufman, E. & Ganesh, B. (2024). The Trump Carnival. Populism, Transgression and the Far Right. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  173. Gerbaudo, P. (2024). Digital Populism. In Y. Stavrakakis & G. Katsambekis (Ed.), Research Handbook on Populism (506–515). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  174. Gordon, D. (2017). ‘Civilization’ and the Self-Critical Tradition. Society, 54, 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-017-0110-4. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  175. Gradstein, M. (2024). Social Status Inequality and Populism. Journal of Comparative Economics, 52(2), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2024.02.001. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  176. Graeber, D. & Wengrow, D. (2021). The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  177. Greve, B. (Ed.) (2021). Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State. Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  178. Gronenborn, D. et al. (2020). Inherent Catastrophes? Social Dynamics and External Forcing in Early Neolithic and Modern SW Germany. In F. Reide & P. Sheets (Ed.), Going Forward by Looking Back: Archaeological Perspectives on Socio-Ecological Crisis, Response, and Collapse (333–366). New York: Berghahn. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  179. Haas, T. (2024). On the links between climate scepticism and right-wing populism (RWP): an explanatory approach based on cultural political economy (CPE). New Political Economy, 29(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2275017. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  180. Haasnoot. M.; Lawrence, J. & Magnan, A. K. (2021). Pathways to coastal retreat. The shrinking solution space for adaptation calls for long-term dynamic planning starting now. Science, 372(6548): 1287–1290. DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6594 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  181. Habermas, J. (1998). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  182. Hartwell, C. A. & Devinney, T. M. (2023). A Responsibility to Whom? Populism and Its Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, 63(2), 300–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503231163536. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  183. Hausfather, Z. (2025). State of the climate: 2025 on track to be second or third warmest year on record. Carbon Brief, 29 July 2025. https://www.carbonbrief.org/state-of-the-climate-2025-on-track-to-be-second-or-third-warmest-year-on-record/ (last accessed: 2025, July 22). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  184. Heidenreich, F. (2023). Nachhaltigkeit und Demokratie. Eine politische Theorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  185. Heinisch, R. & V. Jansesberger (2024). Lacking control -analysing the demand side of populist party support. European Politics and Society, 25(2), 266–285. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2022.2150027. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  186. Heinisch, R., Holtz-Bacha, C. & Mazzoleni, O. (Ed.). (2021). Political Populism. Handbook of Concepts, Questions and Strategies of Research. 2nd Edition. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  187. Hickman, T. et al. (Eds.). (2018). The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  188. Hillje, J. (2025). Mehr Emotionen wagen. Wie wir Angst, Hoffnung und Wut nicht dem Populismus überlassen. Ein Plädoyer für eine demokratische Emotionskultur. Munich: Piper. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  189. Hochachka, G., Wise, M. & Regan, W. (2025). ‘Sensemaking’ climate change: navigating policy, polarization and the culture wars. npj Climate Action, 4, 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00240-7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  190. Huber, R. A., Maltby, T., Szulecki, K. & Ćetković, S. (2021). Is populism a challenge to European energy and climate policy? Empirical evidence across varieties of populism. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 998–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918214. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  191. Ignatieff, M. (2022). Democracy Versus Democracy: The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy. In A. Velasco & I. Bucelli (Ed.), Populism. Origins and Alternative Policy Responses (35–52). London: LSE Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  192. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC. doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6–9789291691647. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  193. Jaeggi, R. (2018). Critique of Forms of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  194. Jaeggi, R. (2025). Progress and Regression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  195. Jones, P. & Menon, A. (2024). Varieties of Populists. Paths to Power and Implications for Regime Stability. In M. Bernhard, A. Kreppel & C. de la Torre (Ed.), Still the Age of Populism? Re-examining Theories and Concepts (68–89). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  196. Jørgensen, P. S. et al. (2024). Evolution of the polycrisis: Anthropocene traps that challenge global sustainability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London (B), Biological Science, 379 (1893): 20220261. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0261. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  197. Kaidatzis, A. et al. (2024). How Populism Affects Constitutional Law. In: A. Kaidatzis et al. (Ed.), The People’s Constitution. The Populist Transformation of Constitutional Law? (3–28). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978–3–031–71889–2_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  198. Kallis, A. (2020). ‘Counter-spurt’ but not ‘de-civilization’: fascism, (un)civility, taboo, and the ‘civilizing process.’ Journal of Political Ideologies, 26(1), 3–22. doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1825278. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  199. Kaltwasser, C. R. et al. (Ed.) (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford Academic. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  200. Kareiva, P. & V. Carranza (2018). Existential risk due to ecosystem collapse: Nature strikes back. Futures, 102, 39–50. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  201. Kaven, C. (2020). Die Ordnung des Zerfalls Verlaufsformen im Angesicht ökologischer Krisen. Soziologie und Nachhaltigkeit, 2, 49–64. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  202. Kemp, L.; Xu, C., Depledge, J.; Ebi, K. L.; Gibbins, G.; Kohler, T. A.; Rockström, J.; Scheffer, M.; Schellnhuber, H. J.; Steffen, W. & Lenton, T.M. (2022). Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 119(34) e2108146119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  203. Ko, J., Lee, H. F. & Leung, C.K. (2024). War and warming: The effects of climate change on military conflicts in developing countries (1995–2020). Innovation and Green Development 3(4), 100175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100175. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  204. Koch, C. M. (2024). ‚The People’ vs. the Liberal International Order. Varieties of Populism & the International Politics of Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  205. Kochi, T. (2023). Authoritarian Populism, Democracy and the Long Counter-Revolution of the Radical Right. Contemporary Political Theory, 22, 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00611-3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  206. Kornhuber, K., Coumou, D., Vogel, E. et al. (2020). Amplified Rossby waves enhance risk of concurrent heatwaves in major breadbasket regions. Nature Climate Change, 10, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0637-z. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  207. Kovalčík, M. (2022). The instrumental abuse of constitutional courts: how populists can use constitutional courts against the opposition. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(7), 1160–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2108017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  208. Krekó, P. (2021). Populism in Power. The Tribal Challenge. In J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano & K. Fiedler (Eds), The Psychology of Populism. The Tribal Challenge to Liberal Democracy. (251–269). London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  209. Krygier, M., Czarnota, A. & Sadurski, W. (Ed.) (2022). Anti-Constitutional Populism. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  210. Küppers, A. (2022). ‘Climate-Soviets,’ ‘Alarmism,’ and ‘Eco-Dictatorship’: The Framing of Climate Change Scepticism by the Populist Radical Right Alternative for Germany. German Politics, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2056596 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  211. Lauer, A. et al. (2025). Beyond Green capitalism: Global scenarios for fast societal transitions toward sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 56, 100981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.100981. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  212. Linklater, A. (2019). Process Sociology and Human Emancipation: Involvement and Detachment Reconsidered. Human Figurations Journal, 8(1). https://norbert-elias.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/HF_vol8-n1-3.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  213. Linklater, A. (2020). The Idea of Civilization and the Making of the Global Order. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  214. Lucky, M. C. (2023). Knowledge-Making in Politics: Expertise in Democracy and Epistocracy. Political Theory, 52(3), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917231199495 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  215. Luhmann, N. (1996). Social Systems. Redwood City, CA: Stanford Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  216. Machin, A. (2022). Climates of democracy: Skeptical, rational, and radical imaginaries. WIREs Climate Change, 13(4), e773. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.774. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  217. MacKay, K. (2017). Radical Transformation: Oligarchy, Collapse, and the Crisis of Civilization. Toronto: Between The Lines Book. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  218. Mackenthun, G. (2021). Sustainable Stories: Managing Climate Change with Literature. Sustainability, 13, 4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074049. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  219. Mackenthun, G. (2023). Planters of Doom and Playful Gardeners. Determinist and Possibilist Narratives of Mankind. In G. Mackenthun & J. Dosch (Ed.), Subversive Semantics in Political and Cultural Discourse (181–225). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  220. Malmqvist, K. (2024). Avoiding the hope of avoiding collapse: collapsology and non-hope as an emotional practice of conviction. Social Movement Studies, 24(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2024.2321131. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  221. Mede, N. G., Schäfer, M. S. & Metag, J. (2024). Cognitio populi – Vox populi: Implications of science-related populism for communication behavior. Communications, 49(4), 645–668. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0059 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  222. Mennell S. (2002). The Other Side of the Coin: Decivilizing Processes. In T. Salumets (Ed.), Norbert Elias and Human Interdependencies (32–49). Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  223. Mennell S. & Goudsblom J. (Ed.) (1998). Norbert Elias: On Civilization, Power, and Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  224. Miller, M. (2002). Some Theoretical Aspects of Systemic Learning. Sozialer Sinn, 3(3), 379–422. doi:10.1515/sosi-2002–0302. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  225. Milner, A. & Burgmann, J. R. (2020). Science Fiction & Climate Change. A Sociological Approach. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  226. Monios, J. & Wilmsmeier, G. (2021). Deep adaptation and collapsology. In F. J. Carrillo & G. Koch (Ed.), Knowledge For The Anthropocene. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800884298.00023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  227. Moran, M., & Littler, J. (2020). Cultural populism in new populist times. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 857–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420960477 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  228. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  229. Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs Democracy: Why our Freedom is in Danger and How to save it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  230. Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  231. Muno, W. & Pfeiffer, C. (2022). Populism in power – A comparative analysis of populist governance. International Area Studies Review, 25(4), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/22338659221120067. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  232. Naylor, A. et al. (2020). Conceptualizing Climate Vulnerability in Complex Adaptive Systems. One Earth, 2(5), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.011. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  233. Nazir, M. et al. (2025). From conflict to a climate future: Unraveling the nexus between warfare and environmental degradation. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100525. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  234. Neal, T. et al. (2025). Reconsidering the macroeconomic damage of severe warming. Environmental Research Letters, 20(4), 044029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adbd58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  235. Neckel, S. (2021). Im Angesicht der Katastrophe. Der nahende Zusammenbruch des Erdsystems und die sozial-ökologische Transformation. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 2, 51–58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  236. O’Brien, K., et al. (2012). Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  237. Obringer, R. et al. (2022). Implications of increasing household air conditioning use across the United States under a warming climate. Earth's Future, 10, e2021EF002434. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002434. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  238. Ofstehage, A., Wolford, W. & Borras, S. M. (2022). Contemporary Populism and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47, 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-124635 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  239. Oswald, M. (Ed.) (2022). The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  240. Pamuk, Z. (2021). Politics and Expertise. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  241. Pepperell, N. (2016). The unease with civilization: Norbert Elias and the violence of the civilizing process. Thesis Eleven, 137(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616638480. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  242. Peruzzotti, E. (2017). Populism as Democratization’s Nemesis: The Politics of Regime Hybridization. Chinese Political Science Review, 2, 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0070-2. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  243. Quilley, S. (2020). Elias in the Anthropocene: Human Nature, Evolution and the Politics of the Great Acceleration. In J. Pereira & A. Saramago (Ed.), Non-Human Nature in World Politics. Frontiers in International Relations (111–139). Charm: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  244. Reusswig, F. (2022). Ganz normale Katastrophen. Biodiversitätsverlust, Klimawandel und Covid-19-Pandemie als Anthropozän-Krisen. In L. Berger, H.-W. Frohn & C. Schell (Ed.), Biodiversitätsverlust, Klimawandel und Covid-19-Pandemie. Zum Verhältnis bestehender Krisenlagen (21–44). Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  245. Reusswig, F. et al. (2026). High-end climate change risks for Germany. Adaptive capacity between incrementalism and transformative adaptation. Accepted by GAIA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  246. Reusswig, F., Lass, W. & Bock, S. (2022). Populistische Narrative der Energiewende und die Zukunft der Demokratie. In J. Zilles, E. Drewing & J. Janik (Ed.), Umkämpfte Zukunft. Zum Verhältnis von Nachhaltigkeit, Demokratie und Konflikt (183–202). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  247. Richards, C.E., Lupton, R.C. & Allwood, J.M. (2021). Re-framing the threat of global warming: an empirical causal loop diagram of climate change, food insecurity and societal collapse. Climatic Change, 164, 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02957-w. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  248. Richardson, K. et al. (2023). Earth beyond Six of Nine Planetary Boundaries. Science Advances, 9 (37): eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  249. Rockström, J. (2025). Diagnosing earth’s tipping points: where we stand in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1653860. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1653860. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  250. Rosa, H. (2019). Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Cambridge etc.: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  251. Runciman, D. (2018). How Democracy Ends. London: Profile Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  252. Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  253. Schad, M. & Sommer, B. (2025): Socioecological transformation and conflict. Arenas, topics, and dimensions. In H. Knoblauch, V. Sommer & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Spatial Conflicts and Conflictual Spaces (309–329). London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  254. Scheffran, J. et al. (2025). Tipping cascades between conflict and cooperation in climate change. Earth System Dynamics, 16, 1197–1219. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1197-2025. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  255. Scherer, K. R. (2022). Emotions, social coordination, and the danger of affective polarization. Cognition and Emotion, 36(8), 1458–1463. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2181315 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  256. Schroer, M. (2022). Geosoziologie. Die Erde als Raum des Lebens. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  257. Schumacher, G., Rooduijn, M. & Bakker, B.N. (2022). Hot Populism? Affective Responses to Antiestablishment Rhetoric. Political Psychology, 43, 851–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12832. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  258. Selk, V. & Kemmerzell, J. (2022). Retrogradism in context. Varieties of right-wing populist climate politics. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1999150 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  259. Senghaas, D. (2002). The Clash within Civilizations. Coming to Terms with Cultural Conflicts. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  260. Senghaas, D. (2004). The Civilisation of Conflict: Constructive Pacifism as a Guiding Notion for Conflict Transformation. In A. Austin, M. Fischer & N. Ropers (Ed.), Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflict. (25–39). VS Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (VS). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  261. Serdeczny, O. et al. (2024). Climatic risks to adaptive capacity. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10103-3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  262. Sharma, D. C. (2023). Climate disasters challenge health infrastructures in India. The Lancet, 402, 279–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01512-X. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  263. Sherman, P., H. Lin & M. McElroy (2022). Projected global demand for air conditioning associated with extreme heat and implications for electricity grids in poorer countries. Energy and Buildings, 268, 112198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112198 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  264. Siders, A. R. (2019). Adaptive capacity to climate change: A synthesis of concepts, methods, and findings in a fragmented field. WIREs Climate Change, 10(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.573. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  265. Singha, S. & Singha, R. (2024). Populism and Climate Change. In: Chennattuserry, J. C., Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  266. Deshpande, M. & Hong, P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of New Populism and Responses in the 21st Century (583–588), Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7802-1_445 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  267. Slaby, J. (2023). Structural apathy, affective injustice, and the ecological crisis. Philosophical Topics, 51(1), 63–84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48776804. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  268. Smirnov, O. et al. (2022). Climate Change, Drought, and Potential Environmental Migration Flows Under Different Policy Scenarios. International Migration Review, 57(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183221079850. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  269. Sommer, B. et al. (2022). Rechtspopulismus vs. Klimaschutz? Positionen, Einstellungen, Erklärungsansätze. München: Oekom. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  270. Spaiser, V. et al. (2024). Negative social tipping dynamics resulting from and reinforcing Earth system destabilization. Earth System Dynamics, 15, 1179–1206. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1179-2024. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  271. Spissinger, F. (2024). Die Gefühlsgemeinschaft der AfD. Narrative, Praktiken und Räume zum Wohlfühlen. Opladen etc.: Barbara Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  272. Stede, M. & R. Memminger. (2025). AfD-CCC: Analyzing the Climate Change Discourse of a German Right-wing Political Party, Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact (NLP4PI), p.163 – 174. https://aclanthology.org/2025.nlp4pi-1.14.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  273. Steel, D., DesRoches C. T. & K. Mintz-Woo (2022). Climate change and the threat to civilization. PNAS, 119(42), e2210525119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210525119 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  274. Steffen, W. et al. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 115, 8252–8259. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  275. Stockemer, D. (Ed.) (2019). Populism Around the World. A Comparative Perspective. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  276. Tainter, J. A. (1988): The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  277. Tietjen, R. R. (2023). The Affects of Populism. Journal of the American Philosophical Association. 9(2), 284–302. doi:10.1017/apa.2021.56. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  278. Treibel, A., Blomert, R. & Kuzmics, H. (Ed.) (2000). Zivilisationstheorie in der Bilanz. Beiträge zum 100. Geburtstag von Norbert Elias. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  279. Tushnet, M. (2019). Varieties of populism. German Law Journal, 20, 382–389. doi: 10.1017/glj.2019.27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  280. Tushnet, M. & Bugarič, B. (2021). Power to the People. Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  281. UNEP (United Nations Environment Program) (2019). Global Environment Outlook 6. Nairobi: UNEP. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  282. van Krieken, R. (2024). The Age of Anger and Social Media: Elias, Technology, Civilizing/Decivilizing Processes and Ressentiment. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(7–8), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241299767 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  283. Voelz, J. (2022). Reading Populism with Bourdieu and Elias. In A. Franke; S. Mueller; S. Sarkowsky, K. (Ed), Reading the Social in American Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93551-1_10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  284. Wallenhorst, N. (2023). A Critical Theory for the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37738-9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  285. Warner, K. et al. (2019). Characteristics of transformational adaptation in climate-land-society interactions. Sustainability, 11, 356. DOI: 10.3390/su11020356. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  286. Wesche, T. (2014). Hegel und die Demokratie. In H. Rosa & K. Vieweg (Ed.), Zur Architektonik praktischer Vernunft – Hegel in Transformationen (135–156), Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  287. Wesche, T. (2023). Die Rechte der Natur. Vom nachhaltigen Eigentum. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  288. Weyland, K. (2024). Populism as a political strategy. In Y. Stavarakis & G. Katsambekis (Ed.), Research Handbook on Populism (154–165). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  289. Winkelmann, R. et al. (2022). Social tipping processes towards climate action: A conceptual framework, Ecol. Econ., 192, 107242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107242 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  290. Wunderling, N. et al. (2024). Climate tipping point interactions and cascades: a review, Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 41–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-41-2024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  291. Xiao, R. et al. (2023). The development of ecological civilization in China based on the economic–social–natural complex system, Ambio, 52, 1910–1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01937-x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  292. Xu, C., T. A. Kohler, T. M. Lenton, J. C. Svenning & M. Scheffer (2020). Future of the human climate niche. PNAS, 117, 11350–11355. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  293. Zaslove, A. & Meijers, M. (2023). Populist Democrats? Unpacking the Relationship Between Populist and Democratic Attitudes at the Citizen Level. Political Studies, 72(3), 1133–1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231173800. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  294. Zhang, J. & Fu, B. (2023). Eco-civilization: A complementary pathway rooted in theory and practice for global sustainable development. Ambio, 52, 1882–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01902-8. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  295. Ziblatt, D. & Levitsky S. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  296. Zick, A., Küpper, B. & Mokros, N. (Ed.) (2023). Die distanzierte Mitte: Rechtsextreme und demokratiegefährdende Einstellungen in Deutschland. Bonn: J. H. W. Dietz Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  297. All treaties and regulations of IHL retrieved from: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties (last accessed: 2025, September 9). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  298. Altenstaedt, R. L. (2006). Trench fever: The British medical response in the Great War. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(11), 564–586. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  299. Beck, U. (2016). The metamorphosis of the world. Cambridge & Malden, MA: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  300. Brady, L. M. (2005). The wilderness of war: Nature and strategy in the American Civil War. Environmental History 1(3), 421–447. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  301. Braudel, F. (1960). History and the social sciences: The long duration. American Behavioral Scientist, 3(6), 3–13. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  302. Bucholc, M., Canihac, H., Delmotte, F., & van Krieken, R. (2024). Law and (de)civilization: An introduction. Historical Social Research, 49(2), 7–33. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  303. Bucholc, M. (2024). Legal governance of abortion: Interdependencies and centrifugal forces in the global figuration of human rights. Historical Social Research, 49(2), 133–155. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  304. Charlier, B. & Mustafayev, T. (2022). International humanitarian law and the protection of cultural property. In J. Cuno & T. G. Weiss (Eds.), Cultural Heritage and Mass Atrocities (381–395). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  305. Chin, S. (2024). Powerful call to action by Ukraine and members of civil society for the International Criminal Court to address ‘ecocide’. Retrieved from https://www.envirosecurity.org/top-stories/powerful-call-to-action-by-ukraine-and-members-of-civil-society-for-the-international-criminal-court-to-address-ecocide (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  306. Cirillo, V. J. (2008). Two faces of death: Fatalities from disease and combat in America’s principal wars, 1775 to present. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 51(1), 121–133. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  307. Council of Europe (2024). Register of damage caused by the aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Categories of claims eligible for recording. Retrieved from: https://www.rd4u.coe.int/documents/358068/424646/RD4U-Board%282024%2907-Rev1-EN+-+Categories+of+Claims+eligible+for+recording.pdf/74037c42-4c7e-c197-a06f-47673f2659bb?t=1743593800002 (last accessed: 2025, December 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  308. Council of Europe (2025, December 8). Council of Europe conference to launch International Claims Commission for Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://www.coe.int/de/web/portal/-/council-of-europe-conference-to-launch-international-claims-commission-for-ukraine (last accessed: 2025, December 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  309. Depledge, D. (2023). Low carbon warfare: Climate change, net zero and military operations. International Affairs, 99(2), 667–685. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  310. Dienelt, A. (2022). Armed conflicts and the environment: Complementing the laws of armed conflict with human rights law and international environmental law. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  311. Droege, C. & Tougas, M.-L. (2013). The protection of the natural environment in armed conflict: Existing rules and need for further legal protection. Nordic Journal of International Law, 82(1), 21–52. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  312. Elias, N. (1939 [2012]). On the process of civilization: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Transl. by E. Jephcott. Dublin: University College Dublin Press (Collected works of Norbert Elias, Vol. 3). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  313. Elias, N. (1970 [2012]). What is sociology? Transl. by G. Morrissey, S. Mennell & E. Jephcott. Dublin: University College Dublin Press (Collected works of Norbert Elias, Vol. 5). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  314. Elias, N. (1986 [2009]). On Nature. In R. Kilminster & S. Mennell (Eds.), Norbert Elias. Essays I: On the sociology of knowledge and the sciences (53–65). Dublin: University College Dublin Press (Collected works of Norbert Elias, Vol. 14). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  315. Elias, N. (1987 [2001]). The Society of Individuals. Transl. by E. Jephcott. Dublin: University College Dublin Press (Collected works of Norbert Elias, Vol. 10). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  316. Elias, N. (1989 [2013]). Studies on the Germans: Power struggles and the development of habitus in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Transl. by E. Dunning & S. Mennell. Dublin: University College Dublin Press (Collected works of Norbert Elias, Vol. 11). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  317. Feuer, A. (2023). Environmental warfare tactics in irregular conflicts. Perspectives on Politics, 21(2), 533–549. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  318. Frey, S. R. (2013). Agent Orange and America at war in Vietnam and Southeast Asia. Human Ecology Review, 20(1), 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  319. Ghosh, Amitav (2021). The nutmeg’s curse: Parables for a planet in crisis. London: John Murray. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  320. Grotius, H. (1646 [1925]). De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres. Volume Two. The translation. Transl. by F. W. Kelsey, ed. by J. B. Scott. Oxford & London: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  321. Hamblin, J. D. (2013). Arming mother nature: The birth of catastrophic environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  322. ICRC (2004). What is International Humanitarian Law? By: International Committee of the Red Cross, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law. Retrieved from: https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/other/what_is_ihl.pdf (last accessed: 2025, July 22). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  323. ICRC (2020). Guidelines on the protection of the natural environment in armed conflicts: Rules and recommendations relating to the protection of the natural environment under international humanitarian law, with commentary. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/4382-guidelines-protection-natural-environment-armed-conflict (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  324. Jensen, E. T. (2005). The international law of environmental warfare: Active and passive damage during armed conflict. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 38 (1), 145–185. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  325. Kalshoven, F. & Zegveld, L. (2011). Constraints on the waging of war: An introduction to international humanitarian law. Fourth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  326. Killean, R. & Newton, E. (2024). From ecocide to ecocentrism: Conceptualising environmental victimhood at the International Criminal Court. International Review of Victimology, 31(2), 238–264. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  327. Koskenniemi, M. (2001). The gentle civilizer of nations: The rise and fall of international law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  328. Kreike, E. (2021). Scorched earth: Environmental warfare as a crime against humanity and nature. Princeton, NJ & Oxford: Princeton University Press (Human rights and crimes against humanity, 30). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  329. Leebaw, B. (2014). Scorched earth: Environmental war crimes and international justice. Perspectives on Politics, 12(4), 770–788. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  330. Martin, S. B. (2016). Norms, military utility, and the use/non-use of weapons: The case of anti-plant and irritant agents in the Vietnam war. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39(3), 321–364. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  331. Martini, E. (2012). Even we can’t prevent forests: The chemical war in Vietnam and the illusion of control. War & Society, 31(3), 264–279. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  332. Mayor, A. (2022). Greek fire, poison arrows, and scorpion bombs: Unconventional warfare in the ancient world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  333. McNeill, J. R. (2004). Woods and warfare in world history. Environmental History, 9(3), 388–410. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  334. Muscolino, M. S. (2015). The ecology of war in China: Henan Province, the Yellow River, and beyond, 1938–1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Studies in environment and history). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  335. Namibia (1999, May 14). UN Security Council, 4003rd Meeting (United Nations, S/PV.4003). Retrieved from: https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/1999 (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  336. Nuccitelli, D. (2025). The Republican campaign to stop the U.S. EPA from protecting the climate. Retrieved from: https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2025/08/the-republican-campaign-to-stop-the-u-s-epa-from-protecting-the-climate/ (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  337. Oatsvall, N. S. (2013). Trees versus lives: Reckoning military success and the ecological effects of chemical defoliation during the Vietnam war. Environment and History, 19(4), 427–458. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  338. Poland (2023, June 6). UN Security Council, 9340th Meeting (United Nations, S/PV.9340). Retrieved from: https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2023 (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  339. Quilley, S. (2004). Ecology, ‘human nature’ and civilizing processes: Biology and sociology in the work of Norbert Elias. In S. Loyal & S. Quilley (Eds.), The Sociology of Norbert Elias (42–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  340. Quilley, S. (2009). The land ethic as an ecological civilizing process: Aldo Leopold, Norbert Elias, and environmental philosophy. Environmental Ethics, 31(2), 115–134. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  341. Quilley, S. (2011). Entropy, the anthroposphere and the ecology of civilization: An essay on the problem of ‘liberalism in one village’ in the long view. The Sociological Review, 59(1), 65–90. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  342. Rockel, S. J. (2009). Collateral damage: a comparative history. In S. J. Rockel & R. Halpern (Eds.), Inventing Collateral Damage: Civilian Casualties, War, and Empire (1–93). Toronto: Between the Lines. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  343. Russian Federation (1999a, May 14). UN Security Council, 4003rd Meeting (United Nations, S/PV.4003). Retrieved from: https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/1999 (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  344. Russian Federation (1999b, June 6). UN Security Council, 4011th Meeting (United Nations, S/PV.4011). Retrieved from: https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/1999 (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  345. Stein, C. (2025). Armee des Rückzugs: Die Wehrmacht an der Ostfront 1941–1945. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag (Moderne Zeit. Neue Forschungen zur Gesellschafts- und Kulturgeschichte des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, 39). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  346. The Guardian (2025, June 26). Are we witnessing the death of international law? By Kinstler, L. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/jun/26/are-we-witnessing-the-death-of-international-law (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  347. Ukraine (2025). EcoZagroza. Retrieved from: https://ecozagroza.gov.ua/en (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  348. United Nations (1992). Rio declaration on environment and development. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/rio1992 (last accessed: 2025, September 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  349. United Nations (2003, November 6). Existing laws not sufficient to address danger posed to environment by conflict, secretary-general says in international day message (Press release SG/SM/8988-OBV/390). Retrieved from: https://press.un.org/en/2003/sgsm8988.doc.htm (last accessed: 2025, July 17). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  350. van Krieken, R. (2019). Law and civilization: Norbert Elias as a regulation theorist. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 15, 267–288. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  351. van Munster, R. (2021). The nuclear origins of the Anthropocene. In D. Chandler, F. Müller & D. Rothe (Eds.), International Relations in the Anthropocene (59–75). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  352. Villalobos, B. (2025). Prosecuting ecocide in Ukraine: The role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) amidst the war. Retrieved from: https://unitedrisingassociation.com/prosecuting-ecocide-in-ukraine-the-role-of-the-international-criminal-court-icc-amidst-the-war/ (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  353. VKC (1962). Working Group 2 of Phase I (Third Exercise) on environmental warfare of the von Karman Committee (VKC-EX 3 GP 2/PH 1). Retrieved from: https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://declassified.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/7479183c2c1f63c2ae45f6515ac7d26a.pdf (last accessed: 2025, September 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  354. Westing, A. H. (1983). The environmental aftermath of warfare in Viet Nam. Natural Resources Journal, 23(2), 365–389. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  355. Westing, A. H. (1985). Environmental warfare. Environmental Law, 15(4), 645–666. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  356. Williams, L. (2011). The social theory of Norbert Elias and the question of the nonhuman world. In A. Goodbody & K. Rigby (Eds.), Ecocritical Theory: New European Approaches (84–97). Charlottesville, VA & London: University of Virginia Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  357. Zierler, D. (2011). Invention of ecocide: Agent Orange, Vietnam, and the scientists who changed the way we think about the environment. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-222
  358. Adamczak, B. (2017). Beziehungsweise Revolution: 1917, 1968 und kommende. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  359. Anders, K. (2000). Die unvermeidliche Universalgeschichte. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  360. Arora, S., Dyck, B. V., Sharma, D., & Stirling, A. (2020). Control, care, and conviviality in the politics of technology for sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1816687 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  361. Asara, V. (2015). Democracy without growth: The political ecology of the Indignados movement [PhD thesis]. Universitat Autònoma. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  362. Asara, V., Profumi, E., & Kallis, G. (2013). Degrowth, democracy and autonomy. Environmental Values, 22(2), 217–239. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  363. Barca, S. (2014). Laboring the Earth: Transnational Reflections on the Environmental History of Work. Environmental History, 19(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emt099 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  364. Baumgart, R., & Eichener, V. (2017). Norbert Elias zur Einführung. Junius Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  365. Bello, W. (2005). Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy. Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  366. Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B. (2016). The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  367. Borowy, I., & Schmelzer, M. (Eds.). (2017). History of the Future of Economic Growth. Historical roots of current debates on sustainable degrowth. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  368. Brand, U., Muraca, B., Pineault, É., Sahakian, M., Schaffartzik, A., Novy, A., Streissler, C., Haberl, H., Asara, V., Dietz, K., Lang, M., Kothari, A., Smith, T., Spash, C., Brad, A., Pichler, M., Plank, C., Velegrakis, G., Jahn, T., … Görg, C. (2021). From planetary to societal boundaries: An argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  369. Brand, U., & Wissen, M. (2024). Kapitalismus am Limit: Öko-imperiale Spannungen, umkämpfte Krisenpolitik und solidarische Perspektiven. oekom verlag GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  370. Büttner, M., & Schmelzer, M. (2021). Fossile Mentalitäten. Zur Geschichte der fossilen Durchdringung moderner Vorstellungswelten. Working Paper Nr. 3, Mentalitäten Im Fluss (Flumen), Jena. https://www.flumen.uni-jena.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Working-Paper-Nr.-3_Schmelzer-und-Buettner_Fossile-Mentalitaeten-Zur-Geschichte-der-fossilen-Durchdringung-moderner-Vorstellungswelten-1.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  371. Caffentzis, G. (2013). In Letters of Blood and Fire: Work, Machines, and the Crisis of Capitalism. PM Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  372. Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. Anthem Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  373. Dale, G. (2012). The growth paradigm: A critique. International Socialism, 134. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  374. Dörre, K., Lessenich, S., & Rosa, H. (2009). Soziologie—Kapitalismus – Kritik: eine Debatte. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  375. Duerr, H. P. (1988). Der Mythos vom Zivilisationsprozeß: Band 1: Nacktheit und Scham. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  376. Duerr, H. P. (2005). Der Mythos vom Zivilisationsprozeß: Band 5: Die Tatsachen des Lebens. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  377. Durand, C., Hofferberth, E., & Schmelzer, M. (2024). Planning beyond growth: The case for economic democracy within ecological limits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140351 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  378. Eastwood, L., & Heron, K. (Eds.). (2024). De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth. In De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth. De Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  379. Elias, N. (1971). Sociology of Knowledge: New Perspectives, Part 2. Sociology, 5(3), 355–370. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  380. Elias, N. (1992). Zivilisation. In B. Schäfers (Ed.), Grundbegriffe der Soziologie (pp. 382–387). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14856-2_142 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  381. Elias, N. (1997a). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Wandlungen des Verhaltens in den westlichen Oberschichten des Abendlandes. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  382. Elias, N. (1997b). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Wandlungen der Gesellschaft. Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  383. Elias, N. (2001). The Society of Individuals. Continuum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  384. Elias, N. (2003). Engagement und Distanzierung. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  385. Elias, N. (2006). Gesammelte Schriften in 19 Bänden: Band 5: Was ist Soziologie? (A. Treibel, Ed.). Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  386. Elias, N. (1989). Studien über die Deutschen: Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  387. Elias, N., & Steenhuis, A. (1984). We still haven’t learnt to control nature and ourselves enough. Interview with Aafke Stenhuis. http://www.kuwi.uni-linz.ac.at/hyperelias/z-elias/abstracts/FullText-eng-1996-T-eng-2.htm Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  388. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  389. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2017). Mehr als Weniger: Erste Überlegungen zur Frage nach dem Postwachstumssubjekt. Psychosozial, 40(2), 83–100. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  390. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2019). Degrowth und Männlichkeiten – Zur Geschlechtlichkeit des relationalen Postwachstumssubjekts. In A. Heilmann & S. Scholz (Eds.), Caring Masculinities? Auf der Suche nach Transformationswegen in eine demokratische Postwachstumsgesellschaft (pp. 173–184). oekom. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  391. Eversberg, D., & Schmelzer, M. (2023). Degrowth and Masculinities: Towards a gendered understanding of degrowth subjectivities. Degrowth Journal, 1. https://www.degrowthjournal.org/publications/2023-04-26-degrowth-and-masculinities-towards-a-gendered-understanding-of-degrowth-subjectivities/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  392. Fioramonti, L. (2013). Gross Domestic Problem: The Politics Behind the World’s Most Powerful Number. Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  393. Fressoz, J.-B. (2024). More and More and More: An All-Consuming History of Energy (1st ed.). Allen Lane. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  394. Freud, S. (2010). Civilization and Its Discontents. W. W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  395. Ghosh, A. (2021). The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  396. Görg, C. (1999). Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse. Westfälisches Dampfboot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  397. Goudsblom, J. (1995). Fire And Civilization. Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  398. Graeber, D. (2019). Bullshit Jobs: The Rise of Pointless Work, and What We Can Do About It (1st ed.). Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  399. Groos, J., & Sorg, C. (2025). Creative Construction: Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond. Bristol University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  400. Hamilton, C. (2016). The Theodicy of the “Good Anthropocene.” Environmental Humanities, 7(1), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3616434 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  401. Hickel, J. (2017). The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions. Cornerstone Digital. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  402. Hobson, J. M. (2017). A critical-sympathetic introduction to Linklater’s odyssey: Bridge over troubled (Eurocentric?) water. Review of International Studies, 43(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000250 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  403. Hofferberth, E., Schmelzer, M., & Durand, C. (2025). Planned Degrowth: Macroeconomic Coordination for Sustainable Degrowth. In J. Groos & C. Sorg (Eds.), Creative Construction: Democratic Planning in the 21st Century and Beyond (pp. 247–264). Bristol University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  404. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2006). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente (16th ed.). Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  405. Hornborg, A. (2016). Global Magic: Technologies of Appropriation from Ancient Rome to Wall Street. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  406. Hughes, J. G. (2013). Drawing Elias – Sketches from Four Interviews. Human Figurations, 2(2). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0002.207 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  407. Hummel, D., Jahn, T., Kramm, J., & Stieß, I. (2024). Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse – Grundbegriff und Denkraum für die Gestaltung von sozial-ökologischen Transformationen. In M. Sonnberger, A. Bleicher, & M. Groß (Eds.), Handbuch Umweltsoziologie (pp. 15–29). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37218-7_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  408. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality. Harper & Row. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  409. IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. 10.59327/IPCC/AR6–9789291691647 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  410. Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  411. Jackson, T. (2025). The Care Economy. Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  412. Kallis, G. (2019). Limits: Why Malthus Was Wrong and Why Environmentalists Should Care. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  413. Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025). Post-growth: The science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(1), e62–e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00310-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  414. Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on Degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 291–316. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  415. Kallis, G., Paulson, S., D’Alisa, G., & Demaria, F. (2020). The Case for Degrowth. Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  416. Kemp, L., Xu, C., Depledge, J., Ebi, K. L., Gibbins, G., Kohler, T. A., Rockström, J., Scheffer, M., Schellnhuber, H. J., Steffen, W., & Lenton, T. M. (2022). Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(34), e2108146119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  417. Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L., & Ehlers, M.-H. (2018). Degrowth and Technology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1619–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  418. Keyßer, L., Steinberger, J., & Schmelzer, M. (2025). Economic growth dependencies and imperatives: A review of key theories and their conflicts. Ecological Economics, 238, 108745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108745 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  419. Kilminster, R. (2007). Norbert Elias: Post-Philosophical Sociology. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  420. Kimmerer, R. W. (2020). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  421. Komlosy, A. (2014). Arbeit: Eine globalhistorische Perspektive. 13. bis 21. Jahrhundert. Promedia. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  422. Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (Eds.). (2019). Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary. Authors Up Front. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  423. Lepenies, P. (2013). Die Macht der einen Zahl. Eine politische Geschichte des Bruttoinlandsprodukts. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  424. Liegey, V., Madelaine, S., Ondet, C., Veillot, A.-I., & Ariès, P. (2013). Un projet de décroissance. Manifeste pour une Dotation inconditionnelle d’autonomie. Les éditions Utopia. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  425. Livingston, J. (2019). Self-Devouring Growth: A Planetary Parable as Told from Southern Africa. Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  426. Malm, A. (2016). Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  427. Mennell, S. (1996). Civilizing and Decivilizing Processes. In The Course of Human History: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  428. Mennell, S. (1998). Norbert Elias: An Introduction. University College Dublin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  429. Merchant, C. (1983). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. Harper & Row. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  430. Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. E. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  431. Mitchell, T. (2014). Economentality: How the Future Entered Government. Critical Inquiry, 40(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.1086/676417 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  432. Nelson, A. (Ed.). (2025). Routledge Handbook of Degrowth. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  433. Nia, E. M. (2003). Zum Begriff des Fortschritts bei Norbert Elias. Shaker. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  434. Nixon, R. (2013). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  435. Oliveira, V. M. de. (2021). Hospicing Modernity: Facing Humanity’s Wrongs and the Implications for Social Activism. North Atlantic Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  436. O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 88(95), 88–95. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  437. Osterhammel, J. (2009). Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts / Jürgen Osterhammel. Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  438. Parrique, T. (2022). Ralentir ou périr: L’économie de la décroissance. SEUIL. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  439. Pineault, E. (2023). A Social Ecology of Capital. Pluto. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  440. Quilley, S. (2013). De-Growth Is Not a Liberal Agenda: Relocalisation and the Limits to Low Energy Cosmopolitanism. Environmental Values, 22(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725310 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  441. Quilley, S. (2020). Elias in the Anthropocene: Human Nature, Evolution and the Politics of the Great Acceleration (pp. 111–139). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  442. Quilley, S., & Loyal, S. (2005). Eliasian Sociology as a ‘Central Theory’ for the Human Sciences. Current Sociology, 53(5), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392105055021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  443. Radkau, J. (2002). Natur und Macht: Eine Weltgeschichte der Umwelt. C.H. Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  444. Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Gregg, J. W., Rockström, J., Mann, M. E., Oreskes, N., Lenton, T. M., Rahmstorf, S., Newsome, T. M., Xu, C., Svenning, J.-C., Pereira, C. C., Law, B. E., & Crowther, T. W. (2024). The 2024 state of the climate report: Perilous times on planet Earth. BioScience, biae087. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae087 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  445. Rosa, H. (2013). Beschleunigung und Entfremdung: Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  446. Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  447. Salleh, A. (2017). Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx, and the Postmodern. Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  448. Saramago, A. (2023). Dualism and Anti-Dualism in the Anthropocene: Process Sociology and Human/Nature Relations in the Great Evolution. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 48(1), 190–212. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  449. Scheidler, F. (2020). The End of the Megamachine: A Brief History of a Failing Civilization. Zero Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  450. Schmelzer, M. (2015a). ‘Expandiere oder stirb.’ Wachstumsziele, die OECD und die Steigerungslogik wirtschaftlicher Expansion. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 41(3), 355–393. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  451. Schmelzer, M. (2015b). The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship. Ecological Economics, 118, 262–271. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  452. Schmelzer, M. (2016). The Hegemony of Growth. The OECD and the Making of the Economic Growth Paradigm. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  453. Schmelzer, M. (2024). ‘Without Growth, Everything is Nothing’: On the Origins of Growthism. In L. Eastwood & K. Heron (Eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth (pp. 26–40). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110778359 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  454. Schmelzer, M., & Büttner, M. (2024). Fossil mentalities: How fossil fuels have shaped social imaginaries. Geoforum, 150, 103981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.103981 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  455. Schmelzer, M., & Hofferberth, E. (2023). Democratic Planning for Degrowth. Monthly Review, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-075-03-2023-07_10 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  456. Schmelzer, M., & Nowshin, T. (2023). Ecological Reparations and Degrowth: Towards a Convergence of Alternatives Around World-making After Growth. Development, 66, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-023-00360-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  457. Schmelzer, M., Vetter, A., & Vansintjan, A. (2022). The Future is Degrowth: A Guide to a World Beyond Capitalism. Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  458. Schröter, M., & Elias, N. (2004). Gesammelte Schriften in 19 Bänden: Band 9: Über die Zeit. Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  459. Sommer, B., & Welzer, H. (2014). Transformationsdesign. Wege in eine zukunftsfähige Moderne. Oekom. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  460. Stay Grounded. (2019). Degrowth of Aviation: Reducing Air Travel in a Just Way. Stay Grounded. https://stay-grounded.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Degrowth-Of-Aviation_2019.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  461. Szeman, I., & Boyer, D. (2017). Energy Humanities: An Anthology. JHU Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  462. Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. Vintage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  463. Treibel, A. (2008). Die Soziologie von Norbert Elias: Eine Einführung in Ihre Geschichte, Systematik und Perspektiven. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  464. van Krieken, R. (1999). The barbarism of civilization: Cultural genocide and the ‘stolen generations’1. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00297.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  465. Van Krieken, R. (2001). Norbert Elias and Process Sociology. In G. Ritzer & B. Smart, Handbook of Social Theory (pp. 353–368). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608351.n27 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  466. van Krieken, R. (2024). The Age of Anger and Social Media: Elias, Technology, Civilizing/Decivilizing Processes and Ressentiment. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(7–8), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241299767 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  467. Vetter, A. (2023). Konviviale Technik: Empirische Technikethik für eine Postwachstumsgesellschaft. transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  468. Vogel, J., & Hickel, J. (2023). Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO2–GDP decoupling in high-income countries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(9), e759–e769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00174-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  469. Vries, B. D., & Goudsblom, J. (Eds.). (2002). Mappae Mundi: Humans and Their Habitats in a Long-Term Socio-Ecological Perspective : Myths, Maps and Models. Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  470. Weber, M. (1920). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. In M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie (pp. 1–206). J.C.B. Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  471. Welzer, H. (2011). Mentale Infrastrukturen: Wie das Wachstum in die Welt und in die Seelen kam (Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Ed.). Heinrich Böll Stiftung. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  472. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245
  473. Wouters, C. (2014). Universally applicable criteria for doing figurational process sociology: Seven balances, one triad. Human Figurations, 3(1). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0003.106 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-245

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien