Figurations of socio-ecological decline: The climate crisis as a process of de- civilisation

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2
Open Access Vollzugriff

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 10 (2025), Heft 2

Figurations of socio-ecological decline: The climate crisis as a process of de- civilisation

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abellan, A. (2025). Performing the People: Affective and Discursive Strategies of Populist Proximity. Preprint. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6829941/v1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  2. Acemoglu, D. & J. A. Robinson (2019). The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. London etc.: Penguin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  3. Adamidis, V. (2021). Democracy, populism, and the rule of law: A reconsideration of their interconnectedness. Politics, 44(3), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211041444 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  4. Albert, G. (2013). Figuration und Emergenz. Zur Ontologie und Methodologie des Ansatzes von Norbert Elias. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 65(2), 193–222. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  5. Albrecht, G. A. (2019). Earth Emotions: New Words for a New World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  6. Alì, N. & Caranti, L. (2021). How much economic inequality is fair in liberal democracies? The approach of proportional justice. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(7), 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720987865. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  7. Anderson, E. N. (1996). Ecologies of the Heart. Emotion, Belief, and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  8. Archer, M. S. (Ed.) (2015). Generative Mechanisms Transforming the Social Order. Cham etc.: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  9. Arguedas, A. R., C. T. Robertson, R. Fletcher & R. K. Nielsen. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review. Oxford: Reuters Institute. DOI: 10.60625/risj-etxj-7k60. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/echo-chambers-filter-bubbles-and-polarisation-literature-review. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  10. Arnason, J. P. (2022). Civilisation, Culture and Power: Reflections on Norbert Elias’s Genealogy of the West. In A. Bogner & S. Mennell (Ed.), Civilisations, Civilising Processes and Modernity – A Debate. Palgrave Studies on Norbert Elias (175–201). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  11. Barker, K. (2025). Anaesthetic Worlds of Denial: ‘Sleepwalking’ Through Climate Change. In J. Glückler, M. Garschagen & R. Panitz (Ed.), Placing the Future (75–96). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  12. Beard, S. J. et al. (2021). Assessing climate change’s contribution to global catastrophic risk. Futures 127, 102673. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  13. Biermann, F. (2022). The future of ‘environmental’ policy in the Anthropocene: time for a paradigm shift. In G. Hayes et al. (Ed.), Trajectories in Environmental Politics (68–88). London: Routledge Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  14. Bingaman, K.A. (2022). The End of the World As We Have Known It? An Introduction to Collapsology. Pastoral Psychol, 71, 753–767. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-022-01026-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  16. Blümel, W.D. (2009). Natural Climatic Variations in the Holocene: Past Impacts on Cultural History, Human Welfare and Crisis. In H.G. Brauch et al. (Ed.), Facing Global Environmental Change. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, (103–118), vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68488-6_5. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  17. Böckenförde, W. (1976). Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit. Studien zur Staatstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  18. Bogner, A. (1989). Zivilisation und Rationalisierung. Die Zivilisationstheorien Max Webers, Norbert Elias' und der Frankfurter Schule im Vergleich. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  19. Böhnert, M., Hornisch, M. & Rink, A. (Ed.) (2025). Apokalypse und Apathie. Handlungs(un)fähigkeiten in der Klimakrise. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  20. Bösel, B. (2023). Die Plastizität der Gefühle. Das affektive Leben zwischen Psychotechnik und Ereignis. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  21. Bosetti, V., Colantone, I., De Vries, C.E. et al. (2025). Green backlash and right-wing populism. Nature Climate Change, 15, 822–828 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02384-0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  22. Bostrom, N. (2019). The vulnerable world hypothesis. Global Policy. 10, 455–476. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  23. Brand, U. et al. (2021). From planetary to societal boundaries: an argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 264–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  24. Buhaug, H. & Uexkuell, N. v. (2021). Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-014708. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  25. Buzogány, A. & Mohamad-Klotzbach, C. (2022). Environmental Populism. In M. Oswald (Ed.). The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. (321–340). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  26. Caiani, M. & Graziano, P. (2022). The Three Faces of Populism in Power: Polity, Policies and Politics. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 569–588. doi:10.1017/gov.2022.4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  27. Caiani, M. & Graziano, P. (Ed.) (2021). Varieties of Populism in Europe in Times of Crisis. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  28. Callahan, C.W. (2025). Present and future limits to climate change adaptation. Nature Sustainability, 8, 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01519-7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  29. Carrión, J. F. (2022). A Dynamic Theory of Populism in Power. The Andes in Comparative Perspective. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  30. Catlin, J. (2022). Bauman, the Frankfurt School, and the tradition of enlightened catastrophism. In J. Palmer & D. Brzeziński (Eds.). Revisiting Modernity and the Holocaust: Heritage, Dilemmas, Extensions (199–218). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120551 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  31. Chakrabarty, D. (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  32. Clark, N. (2020). (Un)Earthing Civilization: Holocene Climate Crisis, City-State Origins and the Birth of Writing. Humanities, 9 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9010001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  33. Clark, N. & Szerszynski, B. (2020). Planetary Social Thought: The Anthropocene Challenge to the Social Sciences. Cambridge etc.: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  34. Clausen, L. (1994). Krasser sozialer Wandel. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  35. Clayton, Susan (2020). Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  36. Clough, P. T. & Halley, J. (Eds.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  37. Colelli, F.P., Wing, I.S. & Cian, E.D. (2023). Air-conditioning adoption and electricity demand highlight climate change mitigation–adaptation tradeoffs. Scientific Reports 13, 4413. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31469-z. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  38. Cox, R. W. (2001). Globalization and Civilizations and the twenty-first century. Some theoretical considerations. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 1(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/1.1.105 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  39. Crawford, N. C. (2022). The Pentagon, Climate Change, and War. Charting the Rise and Fall of U.S. Military Emissions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  40. Dannemann, H. (2024). Populism and Anti-Populism in Climate Politics: Conflict Line, Contingent Relation, or Tacit Alliance in Climate Obstruction? Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVZ) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-024-00581-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  41. Davidson, J.P.L. (2023). Two cheers for collapse? On the uses and abuses of the societal collapse thesis for imagining Anthropocene futures. Environmental Politics, 32(6), 969–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2164238. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  42. Davis, L. et al. (2021). Air conditioning and global inequality. Global Environmental Change, 69, 102299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102299. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  43. Dépelteau, F., Passiani, E. & Mariano, R. (2013). Ariel or Caliban? The Civilizing Process and Its Critiques. In F. Dépelteau, T. S. Landini (Ed.), Norbert Elias and Social Theory (41–59). Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  44. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  45. Diehl, P. & Bargetz, B. (Eds.) (2024). The Complexity of Populism New Approaches and Methods. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  46. Dreier, R. (1991). Recht – Staat – Vernunft. Studien zur Rechtstheorie 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  47. Drucks, S. (2011). Normativität bei Norbert Elias. In J. Ahrend, R. Beer, U.H. Bittligmeier & J. Gerdes (Ed.), Normativität. Über die Hintergründe sozialwissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung (157–187). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  48. du Plessis, E. M. & Husted, E. (2024). Prepping as implicit activism: risk, danger, and post-capitalist imaginaries in prepper literature. Social Movement Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2024.2349568 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  49. Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.) (2002). Multiple Modernities. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  50. Ejsing, M. (2022). The arrival of the Anthropocene in social theory: From modernism and Marxism towards a new materialism. The Sociological Review, 71(1), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221106905. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  51. Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process. Malden & Victoria: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  52. Elias, N. (2001). The Society of Individuals. London & New York: Continuum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  53. Elias, N. (2013). Studies on the Germans. Dublin: University College Dublin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  54. Engels, A. et al. (2024). Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook 2024. Conditions for Sustainable Climate Change Adaptation. Bielefeld: Transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  55. Eslen-Zyia, H. & Giorgi, A. (Ed.) (2022). Populism and Science in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  56. Eversberg, D. et al. (2024). Der neue sozial-ökologische Klassenkonflikt. Mentalitäts- und Interessengegensätze im Streit um Transformation. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  57. Feenberg, A. (2011). The Liberation of Nature? In A. Biro (Ed.), Critical Ecologies. The Frankfurt School and Contemporary Environmental Crises (339–354). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  58. Flannery, F. (2024). Why We Must Stop Saying ‘Climate Apocalypse’: Symbols, Religious Social Memory, and Effective Climate Action. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 59(1), 195–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.11610. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  59. Fletcher, J. (1995). Towards a Theory of Decivilizing Processes. Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift, 22(2), 283–296. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  60. Frankenberg, G. & Heitmeyer, W. (Ed.) (2025). Autoritäre Treiber eines Systemwechsels. Zur Destabilisierung von Institutionen durch die AfD. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  61. Friedlingstein, P. at al. (2025). Global Carbon Budget 2024. Earth System Science Data, 17, 965–1039. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  62. Fuchs, T. (2024). Verkörperte Gefühle. Zur Phänomenologie von Affektivität und Interaffektivität. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  63. Gaufman, E. & Ganesh, B. (2024). The Trump Carnival. Populism, Transgression and the Far Right. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  64. Gerbaudo, P. (2024). Digital Populism. In Y. Stavrakakis & G. Katsambekis (Ed.), Research Handbook on Populism (506–515). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  65. Gordon, D. (2017). ‘Civilization’ and the Self-Critical Tradition. Society, 54, 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-017-0110-4. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  66. Gradstein, M. (2024). Social Status Inequality and Populism. Journal of Comparative Economics, 52(2), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2024.02.001. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  67. Graeber, D. & Wengrow, D. (2021). The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  68. Greve, B. (Ed.) (2021). Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State. Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  69. Gronenborn, D. et al. (2020). Inherent Catastrophes? Social Dynamics and External Forcing in Early Neolithic and Modern SW Germany. In F. Reide & P. Sheets (Ed.), Going Forward by Looking Back: Archaeological Perspectives on Socio-Ecological Crisis, Response, and Collapse (333–366). New York: Berghahn. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  70. Haas, T. (2024). On the links between climate scepticism and right-wing populism (RWP): an explanatory approach based on cultural political economy (CPE). New Political Economy, 29(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2275017. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  71. Haasnoot. M.; Lawrence, J. & Magnan, A. K. (2021). Pathways to coastal retreat. The shrinking solution space for adaptation calls for long-term dynamic planning starting now. Science, 372(6548): 1287–1290. DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6594 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  72. Habermas, J. (1998). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  73. Hartwell, C. A. & Devinney, T. M. (2023). A Responsibility to Whom? Populism and Its Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, 63(2), 300–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503231163536. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  74. Hausfather, Z. (2025). State of the climate: 2025 on track to be second or third warmest year on record. Carbon Brief, 29 July 2025. https://www.carbonbrief.org/state-of-the-climate-2025-on-track-to-be-second-or-third-warmest-year-on-record/ (last accessed: 2025, July 22). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  75. Heidenreich, F. (2023). Nachhaltigkeit und Demokratie. Eine politische Theorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  76. Heinisch, R. & V. Jansesberger (2024). Lacking control -analysing the demand side of populist party support. European Politics and Society, 25(2), 266–285. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2022.2150027. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  77. Heinisch, R., Holtz-Bacha, C. & Mazzoleni, O. (Ed.). (2021). Political Populism. Handbook of Concepts, Questions and Strategies of Research. 2nd Edition. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  78. Hickman, T. et al. (Eds.). (2018). The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  79. Hillje, J. (2025). Mehr Emotionen wagen. Wie wir Angst, Hoffnung und Wut nicht dem Populismus überlassen. Ein Plädoyer für eine demokratische Emotionskultur. Munich: Piper. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  80. Hochachka, G., Wise, M. & Regan, W. (2025). ‘Sensemaking’ climate change: navigating policy, polarization and the culture wars. npj Climate Action, 4, 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00240-7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  81. Huber, R. A., Maltby, T., Szulecki, K. & Ćetković, S. (2021). Is populism a challenge to European energy and climate policy? Empirical evidence across varieties of populism. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 998–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918214. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  82. Ignatieff, M. (2022). Democracy Versus Democracy: The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy. In A. Velasco & I. Bucelli (Ed.), Populism. Origins and Alternative Policy Responses (35–52). London: LSE Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  83. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC. doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6–9789291691647. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  84. Jaeggi, R. (2018). Critique of Forms of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  85. Jaeggi, R. (2025). Progress and Regression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  86. Jones, P. & Menon, A. (2024). Varieties of Populists. Paths to Power and Implications for Regime Stability. In M. Bernhard, A. Kreppel & C. de la Torre (Ed.), Still the Age of Populism? Re-examining Theories and Concepts (68–89). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  87. Jørgensen, P. S. et al. (2024). Evolution of the polycrisis: Anthropocene traps that challenge global sustainability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London (B), Biological Science, 379 (1893): 20220261. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0261. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  88. Kaidatzis, A. et al. (2024). How Populism Affects Constitutional Law. In: A. Kaidatzis et al. (Ed.), The People’s Constitution. The Populist Transformation of Constitutional Law? (3–28). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978–3–031–71889–2_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  89. Kallis, A. (2020). ‘Counter-spurt’ but not ‘de-civilization’: fascism, (un)civility, taboo, and the ‘civilizing process.’ Journal of Political Ideologies, 26(1), 3–22. doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1825278. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  90. Kaltwasser, C. R. et al. (Ed.) (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford Academic. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  91. Kareiva, P. & V. Carranza (2018). Existential risk due to ecosystem collapse: Nature strikes back. Futures, 102, 39–50. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  92. Kaven, C. (2020). Die Ordnung des Zerfalls Verlaufsformen im Angesicht ökologischer Krisen. Soziologie und Nachhaltigkeit, 2, 49–64. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  93. Kemp, L.; Xu, C., Depledge, J.; Ebi, K. L.; Gibbins, G.; Kohler, T. A.; Rockström, J.; Scheffer, M.; Schellnhuber, H. J.; Steffen, W. & Lenton, T.M. (2022). Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 119(34) e2108146119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  94. Ko, J., Lee, H. F. & Leung, C.K. (2024). War and warming: The effects of climate change on military conflicts in developing countries (1995–2020). Innovation and Green Development 3(4), 100175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100175. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  95. Koch, C. M. (2024). ‚The People’ vs. the Liberal International Order. Varieties of Populism & the International Politics of Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  96. Kochi, T. (2023). Authoritarian Populism, Democracy and the Long Counter-Revolution of the Radical Right. Contemporary Political Theory, 22, 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00611-3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  97. Kornhuber, K., Coumou, D., Vogel, E. et al. (2020). Amplified Rossby waves enhance risk of concurrent heatwaves in major breadbasket regions. Nature Climate Change, 10, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0637-z. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  98. Kovalčík, M. (2022). The instrumental abuse of constitutional courts: how populists can use constitutional courts against the opposition. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(7), 1160–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2108017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  99. Krekó, P. (2021). Populism in Power. The Tribal Challenge. In J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano & K. Fiedler (Eds), The Psychology of Populism. The Tribal Challenge to Liberal Democracy. (251–269). London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  100. Krygier, M., Czarnota, A. & Sadurski, W. (Ed.) (2022). Anti-Constitutional Populism. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  101. Küppers, A. (2022). ‘Climate-Soviets,’ ‘Alarmism,’ and ‘Eco-Dictatorship’: The Framing of Climate Change Scepticism by the Populist Radical Right Alternative for Germany. German Politics, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2056596 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  102. Lauer, A. et al. (2025). Beyond Green capitalism: Global scenarios for fast societal transitions toward sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 56, 100981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.100981. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  103. Linklater, A. (2019). Process Sociology and Human Emancipation: Involvement and Detachment Reconsidered. Human Figurations Journal, 8(1). https://norbert-elias.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/HF_vol8-n1-3.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  104. Linklater, A. (2020). The Idea of Civilization and the Making of the Global Order. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  105. Lucky, M. C. (2023). Knowledge-Making in Politics: Expertise in Democracy and Epistocracy. Political Theory, 52(3), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917231199495 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  106. Luhmann, N. (1996). Social Systems. Redwood City, CA: Stanford Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  107. Machin, A. (2022). Climates of democracy: Skeptical, rational, and radical imaginaries. WIREs Climate Change, 13(4), e773. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.774. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  108. MacKay, K. (2017). Radical Transformation: Oligarchy, Collapse, and the Crisis of Civilization. Toronto: Between The Lines Book. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  109. Mackenthun, G. (2021). Sustainable Stories: Managing Climate Change with Literature. Sustainability, 13, 4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074049. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  110. Mackenthun, G. (2023). Planters of Doom and Playful Gardeners. Determinist and Possibilist Narratives of Mankind. In G. Mackenthun & J. Dosch (Ed.), Subversive Semantics in Political and Cultural Discourse (181–225). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  111. Malmqvist, K. (2024). Avoiding the hope of avoiding collapse: collapsology and non-hope as an emotional practice of conviction. Social Movement Studies, 24(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2024.2321131. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  112. Mede, N. G., Schäfer, M. S. & Metag, J. (2024). Cognitio populi – Vox populi: Implications of science-related populism for communication behavior. Communications, 49(4), 645–668. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0059 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  113. Mennell S. (2002). The Other Side of the Coin: Decivilizing Processes. In T. Salumets (Ed.), Norbert Elias and Human Interdependencies (32–49). Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  114. Mennell S. & Goudsblom J. (Ed.) (1998). Norbert Elias: On Civilization, Power, and Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  115. Miller, M. (2002). Some Theoretical Aspects of Systemic Learning. Sozialer Sinn, 3(3), 379–422. doi:10.1515/sosi-2002–0302. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  116. Milner, A. & Burgmann, J. R. (2020). Science Fiction & Climate Change. A Sociological Approach. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  117. Monios, J. & Wilmsmeier, G. (2021). Deep adaptation and collapsology. In F. J. Carrillo & G. Koch (Ed.), Knowledge For The Anthropocene. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800884298.00023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  118. Moran, M., & Littler, J. (2020). Cultural populism in new populist times. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 857–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420960477 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  119. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  120. Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs Democracy: Why our Freedom is in Danger and How to save it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  121. Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  122. Muno, W. & Pfeiffer, C. (2022). Populism in power – A comparative analysis of populist governance. International Area Studies Review, 25(4), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/22338659221120067. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  123. Naylor, A. et al. (2020). Conceptualizing Climate Vulnerability in Complex Adaptive Systems. One Earth, 2(5), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.011. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  124. Nazir, M. et al. (2025). From conflict to a climate future: Unraveling the nexus between warfare and environmental degradation. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100525. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  125. Neal, T. et al. (2025). Reconsidering the macroeconomic damage of severe warming. Environmental Research Letters, 20(4), 044029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adbd58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  126. Neckel, S. (2021). Im Angesicht der Katastrophe. Der nahende Zusammenbruch des Erdsystems und die sozial-ökologische Transformation. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 2, 51–58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  127. O’Brien, K., et al. (2012). Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  128. Obringer, R. et al. (2022). Implications of increasing household air conditioning use across the United States under a warming climate. Earth's Future, 10, e2021EF002434. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002434. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  129. Ofstehage, A., Wolford, W. & Borras, S. M. (2022). Contemporary Populism and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47, 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-124635 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  130. Oswald, M. (Ed.) (2022). The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  131. Pamuk, Z. (2021). Politics and Expertise. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  132. Pepperell, N. (2016). The unease with civilization: Norbert Elias and the violence of the civilizing process. Thesis Eleven, 137(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616638480. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  133. Peruzzotti, E. (2017). Populism as Democratization’s Nemesis: The Politics of Regime Hybridization. Chinese Political Science Review, 2, 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0070-2. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  134. Quilley, S. (2020). Elias in the Anthropocene: Human Nature, Evolution and the Politics of the Great Acceleration. In J. Pereira & A. Saramago (Ed.), Non-Human Nature in World Politics. Frontiers in International Relations (111–139). Charm: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  135. Reusswig, F. (2022). Ganz normale Katastrophen. Biodiversitätsverlust, Klimawandel und Covid-19-Pandemie als Anthropozän-Krisen. In L. Berger, H.-W. Frohn & C. Schell (Ed.), Biodiversitätsverlust, Klimawandel und Covid-19-Pandemie. Zum Verhältnis bestehender Krisenlagen (21–44). Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  136. Reusswig, F. et al. (2026). High-end climate change risks for Germany. Adaptive capacity between incrementalism and transformative adaptation. Accepted by GAIA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  137. Reusswig, F., Lass, W. & Bock, S. (2022). Populistische Narrative der Energiewende und die Zukunft der Demokratie. In J. Zilles, E. Drewing & J. Janik (Ed.), Umkämpfte Zukunft. Zum Verhältnis von Nachhaltigkeit, Demokratie und Konflikt (183–202). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  138. Richards, C.E., Lupton, R.C. & Allwood, J.M. (2021). Re-framing the threat of global warming: an empirical causal loop diagram of climate change, food insecurity and societal collapse. Climatic Change, 164, 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02957-w. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  139. Richardson, K. et al. (2023). Earth beyond Six of Nine Planetary Boundaries. Science Advances, 9 (37): eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  140. Rockström, J. (2025). Diagnosing earth’s tipping points: where we stand in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1653860. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1653860. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  141. Rosa, H. (2019). Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Cambridge etc.: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  142. Runciman, D. (2018). How Democracy Ends. London: Profile Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  143. Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  144. Schad, M. & Sommer, B. (2025): Socioecological transformation and conflict. Arenas, topics, and dimensions. In H. Knoblauch, V. Sommer & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Spatial Conflicts and Conflictual Spaces (309–329). London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  145. Scheffran, J. et al. (2025). Tipping cascades between conflict and cooperation in climate change. Earth System Dynamics, 16, 1197–1219. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1197-2025. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  146. Scherer, K. R. (2022). Emotions, social coordination, and the danger of affective polarization. Cognition and Emotion, 36(8), 1458–1463. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2181315 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  147. Schroer, M. (2022). Geosoziologie. Die Erde als Raum des Lebens. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  148. Schumacher, G., Rooduijn, M. & Bakker, B.N. (2022). Hot Populism? Affective Responses to Antiestablishment Rhetoric. Political Psychology, 43, 851–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12832. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  149. Selk, V. & Kemmerzell, J. (2022). Retrogradism in context. Varieties of right-wing populist climate politics. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1999150 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  150. Senghaas, D. (2002). The Clash within Civilizations. Coming to Terms with Cultural Conflicts. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  151. Senghaas, D. (2004). The Civilisation of Conflict: Constructive Pacifism as a Guiding Notion for Conflict Transformation. In A. Austin, M. Fischer & N. Ropers (Ed.), Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflict. (25–39). VS Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (VS). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  152. Serdeczny, O. et al. (2024). Climatic risks to adaptive capacity. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10103-3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  153. Sharma, D. C. (2023). Climate disasters challenge health infrastructures in India. The Lancet, 402, 279–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01512-X. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  154. Sherman, P., H. Lin & M. McElroy (2022). Projected global demand for air conditioning associated with extreme heat and implications for electricity grids in poorer countries. Energy and Buildings, 268, 112198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112198 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  155. Siders, A. R. (2019). Adaptive capacity to climate change: A synthesis of concepts, methods, and findings in a fragmented field. WIREs Climate Change, 10(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.573. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  156. Singha, S. & Singha, R. (2024). Populism and Climate Change. In: Chennattuserry, J. C., Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  157. Deshpande, M. & Hong, P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of New Populism and Responses in the 21st Century (583–588), Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7802-1_445 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  158. Slaby, J. (2023). Structural apathy, affective injustice, and the ecological crisis. Philosophical Topics, 51(1), 63–84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48776804. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  159. Smirnov, O. et al. (2022). Climate Change, Drought, and Potential Environmental Migration Flows Under Different Policy Scenarios. International Migration Review, 57(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183221079850. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  160. Sommer, B. et al. (2022). Rechtspopulismus vs. Klimaschutz? Positionen, Einstellungen, Erklärungsansätze. München: Oekom. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  161. Spaiser, V. et al. (2024). Negative social tipping dynamics resulting from and reinforcing Earth system destabilization. Earth System Dynamics, 15, 1179–1206. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1179-2024. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  162. Spissinger, F. (2024). Die Gefühlsgemeinschaft der AfD. Narrative, Praktiken und Räume zum Wohlfühlen. Opladen etc.: Barbara Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  163. Stede, M. & R. Memminger. (2025). AfD-CCC: Analyzing the Climate Change Discourse of a German Right-wing Political Party, Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact (NLP4PI), p.163 – 174. https://aclanthology.org/2025.nlp4pi-1.14.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  164. Steel, D., DesRoches C. T. & K. Mintz-Woo (2022). Climate change and the threat to civilization. PNAS, 119(42), e2210525119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210525119 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  165. Steffen, W. et al. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 115, 8252–8259. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  166. Stockemer, D. (Ed.) (2019). Populism Around the World. A Comparative Perspective. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  167. Tainter, J. A. (1988): The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  168. Tietjen, R. R. (2023). The Affects of Populism. Journal of the American Philosophical Association. 9(2), 284–302. doi:10.1017/apa.2021.56. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  169. Treibel, A., Blomert, R. & Kuzmics, H. (Ed.) (2000). Zivilisationstheorie in der Bilanz. Beiträge zum 100. Geburtstag von Norbert Elias. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  170. Tushnet, M. (2019). Varieties of populism. German Law Journal, 20, 382–389. doi: 10.1017/glj.2019.27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  171. Tushnet, M. & Bugarič, B. (2021). Power to the People. Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  172. UNEP (United Nations Environment Program) (2019). Global Environment Outlook 6. Nairobi: UNEP. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  173. van Krieken, R. (2024). The Age of Anger and Social Media: Elias, Technology, Civilizing/Decivilizing Processes and Ressentiment. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(7–8), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241299767 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  174. Voelz, J. (2022). Reading Populism with Bourdieu and Elias. In A. Franke; S. Mueller; S. Sarkowsky, K. (Ed), Reading the Social in American Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93551-1_10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  175. Wallenhorst, N. (2023). A Critical Theory for the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37738-9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  176. Warner, K. et al. (2019). Characteristics of transformational adaptation in climate-land-society interactions. Sustainability, 11, 356. DOI: 10.3390/su11020356. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  177. Wesche, T. (2014). Hegel und die Demokratie. In H. Rosa & K. Vieweg (Ed.), Zur Architektonik praktischer Vernunft – Hegel in Transformationen (135–156), Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  178. Wesche, T. (2023). Die Rechte der Natur. Vom nachhaltigen Eigentum. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  179. Weyland, K. (2024). Populism as a political strategy. In Y. Stavarakis & G. Katsambekis (Ed.), Research Handbook on Populism (154–165). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  180. Winkelmann, R. et al. (2022). Social tipping processes towards climate action: A conceptual framework, Ecol. Econ., 192, 107242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107242 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  181. Wunderling, N. et al. (2024). Climate tipping point interactions and cascades: a review, Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 41–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-41-2024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  182. Xiao, R. et al. (2023). The development of ecological civilization in China based on the economic–social–natural complex system, Ambio, 52, 1910–1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01937-x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  183. Xu, C., T. A. Kohler, T. M. Lenton, J. C. Svenning & M. Scheffer (2020). Future of the human climate niche. PNAS, 117, 11350–11355. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  184. Zaslove, A. & Meijers, M. (2023). Populist Democrats? Unpacking the Relationship Between Populist and Democratic Attitudes at the Citizen Level. Political Studies, 72(3), 1133–1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231173800. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  185. Zhang, J. & Fu, B. (2023). Eco-civilization: A complementary pathway rooted in theory and practice for global sustainable development. Ambio, 52, 1882–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01902-8. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  186. Ziblatt, D. & Levitsky S. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193
  187. Zick, A., Küpper, B. & Mokros, N. (Ed.) (2023). Die distanzierte Mitte: Rechtsextreme und demokratiegefährdende Einstellungen in Deutschland. Bonn: J. H. W. Dietz Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2025-2-193

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien