Organisational principles of the global drug economy

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover des Buchs: Geopolitics of the Illicit
Open Access Vollzugriff

Geopolitics of the Illicit

Linking the Global South and Europe

Autor:innen:
Reihe
Weltwirtschaft und internationale Zusammenarbeit
Band
25
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0015-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3594-0

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Organisational principles of the global drug economy

Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0015-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3594-0
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Behrens, Timo/Brombacher, Daniel (2015): „Transnationale Organisierte Kriminalität“. In: Jäger, Thomas (ed.): Handbuch Sicherheitsgefahren. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 135-145. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  2. Bergmann, Marcelo (2018): Illegal drugs, drug trafficking and violence in Latin America. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  3. Bewley-Taylor, Dave (2016): “Towards metrics that measure outcomes that matter”. At: <https://www.swansea.ac.uk/media/Towards-Metrics-that-Measure-Outcomes-that-Matter.pdf> (accessed 2 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  4. Bouchard, Martin/Ouellet, Frédéric (2011): “Is small beautiful? The link between risks and size in illegal drug markets”. In: Global Crime, 12, 1, pp. 70-86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  5. Bright, David/Greenhill, Catherine/Britz, Thomas/Ritter, Alison/Morselli, Carlo (2017): “Criminal network vulnerabilities and adaptations”. In: Global Crime, 18, 4, pp. 424-441. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  6. Brombacher, Daniel/Garzón, Juan Carlos/Vélez, Maria Alejandra (2021): “Introduction Special Issue: Environmental impacts of illicit economies”. In: Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 3, 1, pp. 1-9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  7. Brombacher, Daniel/David, Sarah (2020): „From alternative development to development-oriented drug policies”. In: International Development Policy, 12, pp. 64-79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  8. Brombacher, Daniel/Maihold, Günther (2013): „Das Gewaltparadox im mexikanischen Drogenkampf: Erklärungsversuche und ihre Folgen“. In: Brombacher, Daniel/Maihold, Günther (eds.): Gewalt, Organisierte Kriminalität und Staat in Lateinamerika. Opladen/Berlin/Toronto: Barbara Budrich, pp. 85-97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  9. Brombacher, Daniel (2013): „Illegal drug cultivation and legal regulatory options in the UN drug control framework. Comparing coca and opium poppy”. In: Matthieu, Hans/Nino, Catalina (eds.): From repression to regulation. Proposals for drug policy reform. Bogotá: FESCOL, pp. 253-289. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  10. Buxton, Julia (2010): “The historical foundation of the narcotic drug control regime”. In: Keefer, Philipp/Loayza, Norman (eds.): Innocent bystanders. Developing countries and the war on drugs. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, pp. 61-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  11. Buxton, Julia (2020): “Drug control and development. A blind spot”. In: International Development Policy, 12, pp. 13-42. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  12. Calderoni, Francesco (2011): “Where is the mafia in Italy? Measuring the presence of the mafia across Italian provinces”. In: Global Crime, 12, 1, pp. 41-69. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  13. Catino, Maurizio (2019): Mafia organizations. The visible hand of criminal enterprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  14. Caulkins, Jonathan/Reuter, Peter (1998): “What price data tells us about drug markets”. In: Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 3, pp. 593-612. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  15. Collins, John (2016): “Development first. Multilateralism in the post-‘war on drugs’ era”. In: After the drug wars. Report of the LSE expert group on the economics of drug policy. London: LSE Press, pp. 9-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  16. Daily Sabah (2021): “Turkey seizes more than 1 ton of cocaine in ‘biggest bust’”. At: <https://www.dailysabah.com/turkey/investigations/turkey-seizes-more-than-1-ton-of-Cocaine-in-biggest-bust> (accessed 04 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  17. Davalos, Liliana/Davalos, Eleonora/Holmes, Jennifer/Tucker, Clara/Armenteras, Dolors (2021): “Forests, coca, and conflict. Grass frontier dynamics and deforestation in the Amazon-Andes”. In: Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 3, 1, pp.74 - 96 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  18. Diskul, Dispanadda/Collins, John/Brombacher, Daniel (2021): “Drugs and development in the urban setting - expanding development-oriented interventions beyond illicit drug crop cultivation.” In: Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 2, 2, pp. 80-90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  19. EMCDDA, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2021a): European Drug Report. Lisbon: EMCDDA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  20. EMCDDA, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drugs Addiction (2021b): Illicit drug markets and supply in the Western Balkans. Impact of COVID-19. EMCDDA Trendspotter Briefing. Lisbon: EMCDDA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  21. EMCDDA, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drugs Addiction (2021c): “Statistical Bulletin. Cocaine price and purity in the European Union”. At: <https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/media-library/Cocaine-price-and-purity-european-union-updated-june-2021_en> (accessed 3 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  22. EMCDDA, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drugs Addiction (2021d) Statistical Bulletin 2021. Prevalence of drug use. At: <https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/data/stats2021/gps_en> (04 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  23. EMCDDA European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drugs Addiction (2021e): “Statistical Bulletin 2021. Price, purity and potency”. At: <https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/data/stats2021/ppp_en> (accessed 12 July 2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  24. EMCDDA, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction/Europol (2019): EU Drug Markets Report. Lisbon/The Hague: EMCDDA, Europol. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  25. EMCDDA, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction/Europol (2020): EU Drug Markets. Impact of Covid-19. Lisbon/The Hague: EMCDDA, Europol. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  26. Europol (2019): “News: 1 176 kg of cocaine hidden in bananas seized in Italy”. At: <https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/1-176-kg-of-Cocaine-hidden-in-bananas-seized-in-italy> (accessed 4 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  27. Europol (2021): Serious and organized crime situation assessment (SOCTA). The Hague: Europol. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  28. Farfán-Méndez, Cecilia (2019): “The structure of drug trafficking organizations and money laundering practices. A risk appetite hypothesis.” In: Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1, 3, pp. 294-311. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  29. Felbab-Brown, Vanda (2020): Fentanyl and geopolitics. Controlling opioid supply from China. Washington D.C.: Brookings. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  30. GI-TOC, Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime (2020): Civil Society Observatory of Illicit Economies in Eastern and Southern Africa, Risk Bulletin, 12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  31. GI-TOC, Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime (2021): Observatory of illicit economies in Southeastern Europe, Risk Bulletin, 7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  32. GI-TOC, Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime/Insight Crime (2021): The Cocaine Pipeline to Europe, Research Report. Vienna/Bogotá: 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  33. GI-TOC, Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime/INTERPOL/RHIPTO, Norwegian Center for Global Analysis (2018): World Atlas of Illicit Flows. Vienna/Oslo/Lyon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  34. Goodhand, Jonathan/Meehan, Patrick/Bhatia, Jasmine/Ghiabi, Maziyar/Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco (2021): “Critical policy frontiers. The drugs-development-peacebuilding trilemma”. In: International Journal of Drug Policy, 89, 103115. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  35. Gootenberg, Paul (2021): “Chicken or eggs? Rethinking illicit drugs and ‘Development’”. In: International Journal of Drug Policy, 89, 102985. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  36. Grimmelmann, Klaas/Arning, Nike/Arnold, Jana/Espinoza, Jorge (2017): “The land-drugs nexus. How illicit drug crop cultivation is related to access to land”. In: Bulletin of Narcotics, 61, LXI, pp. 75-105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  37. Gutiérrez-Sanín, Francisco (2021): “Tough Tradeoffs. Coca crops and agrarian alternatives in Colombia”. In: International Journal of Drug Policy, 89, 103156. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  38. Insight Crime (2020): „Honduras proves fertile ground for coca”. At: https://insightcrime.org/news/brief/coca-crops-flourish-honduras/ (accessed 30 June 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  39. Kenney, Michael (2007): “The architecture of drug trafficking. Network forms of organisation in the Colombian Cocaine trade”. In: Global Crime, 8, 3, pp. 233-259. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  40. Mansfield, David (2020): “Trying to be all things to all people. Alternative development in Afghanistan”. In: International Development Policy, 12, pp. 79-105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  41. Mansfield, David/Soderholm, Alexander (2020): Emerging evidence of Afghanistan’s role as a producer and supplier of ephedrine and methamphetamine. Lisbon: EMCDDA. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  42. Morselli, Carlo/Turcotte, Mathilde/Tenti, Valentina (2011): “The mobility of criminal groups”. In: Global Crime, 12, 3, pp. 165-188. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  43. Morselli, Carlo/Petit, Katja (2007): “Law-enforcement disruption of a drug importation network”. In: Global Crime, 8, 2, pp. 109-130. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  44. Open Society Foundations/Transform Drug Policy Foundation (2008): The alternative world drug report. Counting the costs of the war on drugs. New York/London: Open Society Foundations. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  45. Pearl, Betsy (2019): Ending the war on drugs. By the numbers. Washington D.C.: Center of American Progress. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  46. Pollack, Harold/Reuter, Peter (2014): “Does tougher enforcement make drugs more expensive?”. In: Addiction, 109, pp. 1959-1966. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  47. Reitano, Tuesday (2020): “Making war. Conflict zones and their implications for drug policy”. In: International Development Policy, 12, pp. 127-141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  48. Reuter, Peter (2009): “Systemic violence in drug markets”. In: Crime, Law and Social Change, 52, pp. 275-284. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  49. Reuter, Peter (2010): “Can production and trafficking of illicit drugs be reduced or only shifted?”. In: Keefer, Philipp/Loayza, Norman (eds.): Innocent bystanders. Developing countries and the war on drugs. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, pp. 95-135. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  50. Shaw, Mark (2019): “What could an asymmetrical strategy against organised crime look like? A lesson from the drug policy debate”. In: Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1, 1 pp. 99-106. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  51. Thoumi, Francisco (2010): “Competitive advantages in the production and trafficking of Coca-Cocaine and Opium-Heroin in Afghanistan and the Andean Countries”. In: Keefer, Philip/Loayza, Norman (eds.): Innocent bystanders. Developing countries and the war on drugs. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, pp. 195-253. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  52. UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2019): Afghanistan opium survey 2019. Socio-economic survey report. Drivers, causes and consequences of opium poppy cultivation. Vienna/Kabul: UNODC. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  53. UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2020): Research Brief. COVID-19 and the drug supply chain: from production and trafficking to use. Vienna: UNODC. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  54. UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2021a): World Drug Report 2021, Booklet II. Vienna: UNODC. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  55. UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2021b): “UNODC World Drug Report 2021. Statistical Annex: Prevalence of drug use in the general population including NPS”. At: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2021_annex.html (accessed 11 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  56. UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2021c): UNODC World Drug Report. Statistical Annex: Global seizures of Cocaine and Heroin. At: https://dataunodc.un.org/data/drugs/Global%20Seizures (11 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  57. US Bureau of Transportation Statistics (n.d.): “Border Crossing Data”. At: <https://explore.dot.gov/views/BorderCrossingData/Annual?:isGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y&:embed=y> (accessed 4 July 2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  58. US Department of State (2020): “Mexico Human Rights Report”. At: <https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/MEXICO-2020-HUMAN-RIGHTS-REPORT.pdf> (accessed 2 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99
  59. Janowitz, Nathaniel (2021): “Are Mexican cartels trying to make their own cocaine?”. At: <https://www.vice.com/en/article/epdwd7/are-mexican-cartels-trying-to-make-their-own-cocaine> (accessed 30 June 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-99

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien