Communication floods – Emails in scholarly communication

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Jahrgang 9 (2020), Heft 3
Open Access Vollzugriff

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Jahrgang 9 (2020), Heft 3

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2020
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 9 (2020), Heft 3

Communication floods – Emails in scholarly communication

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  2. Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Ad- vertising, 24(2), 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673605 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  3. Basil, M., & Witte, K. (2011). Health risk message design using the Extended Parallel Pro- cess Model. In H. Cho (Ed.), Health communication message design (pp. 41–71). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  4. Blanc, N., & Brigaud, E. (2014). Humor in print health advertisements: enhanced atten- tion, privileged recognition, and persuasiveness of preventive messages. Health Com- munication, 29(7), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.769832 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  5. Bodemer, N., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Risk perception. In H. Cho, T. Reimer, & K. A. Mc- Comas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of risk communication (pp. 10–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  6. Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied ap- proach (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  7. Burke, M. C., & Edell, J. A. (1989). The impact of feelings on ad-based affect and cogni- tion. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172670 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  8. Breitsohl, H. (2018). Beyond ANOVA. Organizational Research Methods, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118754988 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  9. Campos, B., Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., Gonzaga, G. C., & Goetz, J. L. (2013). What is shared, what is different? Core relational themes and expressive displays of eight posi- tive emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 27(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269993 1.2012.683852 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  10. Carey, R. N., McDermott, D. T., & Sarma, K. M. (2013). The impact of threat appeals on fear arousal and driver behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental research 1990–2011. PloS one, 8(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062821 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). CDC fact sheet: Reported STDs in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https:///www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/std-trends-508.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  12. Choi, Y. H., Cameron, G. T., & Leshner, G. M. (2006). Defining fear appeals-based ant- ismoking PSAs using Izard’s differential emotions scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany. Re- trieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p90143_index.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  13. Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., Bolls, P. D., & Thorson, E. (2016). Discard the smoking cues Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  14. – keep the disgust: An investigation of tobacco smokers’ motivated processing of anti- tobacco commercials. Health Communication, 32(11), 1319–1330. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10410236.2016.1220042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  15. Cohen, E. L., Shumate, M. D., & Gold, A. (2007). Anti-smoking media campaign messag- es: Theory and practice. Health Communication, 22(2), 91–102. https://doi. org/10.1080/10410230701453884 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  16. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi. org/10.1080/03637750500111815 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  17. Donohew, L., Palmgreen, P., & Lorch, E. P. (1994). Attention, need for sensation, and health communication campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(2), 310–322. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1177/0002764294038002011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  18. Duhachek, A., Agrawal, N., & Han, D. (2012). Guilt versus shame: Coping, fluency, and framing in the effectiveness of responsible drinking messages. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0244 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  19. Earl, A., & Albarracín, D. (2007). Nature, decay, and spiraling of the effects of fear-induc- ing arguments and HIV counseling and testing: A meta-analysis of the short- and long- term outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. Health Psychology, 26(4), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.496 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  20. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  21. Evers, C. W., Albury, K., Byron, P., & Crawford, K. (2013). Young people, social media, social network sites and sexual health communication in Australia: “This is funny, you should watch it”. International Journal of Communication, 7, 263–280. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1106 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  22. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  23. Forgas, J. P. & Koch, A. S. (2013). Mood effects on cognition. In M. D. Robinson, E. R. Watkins, & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 231– 251). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  24. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The Broad- en-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions. The American psychologist, 56(3), 218– 226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  25. Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2 Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P., Gysbers, A., . . . Sacau, A. (2016). The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES). Journal of Media Psychology, 28, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  26. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000137 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  27. Heffes, A. (2011). First exorcism. On The Rite (Original Motion Picture Score) [CD]. Unit- ed Kingdom: Silva Screen Records Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  28. Hohenemser, C., Kates, R. W., & Slovic, P. (1985). A causal taxonomy. In R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, & J. X. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology (pp. 67–89). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  29. Holmes, M. S. (2013). Cancer comics: Narrating cancer through sequential art. Tulsa Stud- ies in Women’s Literature, 33(1), 147–162. Retrieved from https://www.muse.jhu.edu/ article/550202. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  30. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  31. Jäger, T., & Eisend, M. (2013). Effects of fear-arousing and humorous appeals in social marketing advertising: The moderating role of prior attitude toward the advertised behavior. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 34(1), 125–134. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2013.754718 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  32. Kim, S.-H., & Willis, A. (2007). Talking about obesity: News framing of who is responsi- ble for causing and fixing the problem. Journal of Health Communication, 12(4), 359– 376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701326051 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  33. Kok, G., Peters, G.-J. Y., Kessels, L. T. E., ten Hoor, G. A., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2018). Ignor- ing theory and misinterpreting evidence: The false belief in fear appeals. Health Psy- chology Review 12(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1415767 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  34. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819–834. https://doi.org/ 10.1037//0003-066x.46.8.819 Lee, J. Y., Slater, M. D., & Tchernev, J. M. (2015). Self-deprecating humor versus other- deprecating humor in health messages. Journal of Health Communication, 20(10), Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  35. 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018591 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  36. Lee, S. T., & Cheng, I.-H. (2010). Assessing the TARES as an ethical model for antismok- ing ads. Journal of Health Communication, 15(1), 55–75. https://doi. org/10.1080/10810730903460542 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  37. Leiss, W. (2004). Effective risk communication practice. Toxicology Letters, 149(1–3), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.050 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  38. Lewis, I. M., Watson, B., White, K. M., & Tay, R. (2007). Promoting public health mes- sages: Should we move beyond fear-evoking appeals in road safety? Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306296395 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  39. Lewis, I., Watson, B., & White, K. M. (2013). Extending the explanatory utility of the EPPM beyond fear-based persuasion. Health Communication, 28(1), 84–98. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.743430 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  40. Lo-Fo-Wong, D. N. N., Beijaerts, A., de Haes, H. C. J. M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2014). Cancer in full-color: Use of a graphic novel to identify distress in women with breast cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 19(12), 1554–1563. https://doi. org/10.1177/1359105313495905 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  41. Martin, R. A. (2010). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.127.4.504 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  42. McGraw, A. P., Schiro, J. L., & Fernbach, P. M. (2015). Not a problem: A downside of humorous appeals. Journal of Marketing Behavior, 1(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/ 10.1561/107.00000012 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  43. McNicol, S., & Weaver, S. (2013). “Dude! You mean you’ve never eaten a peanut butter and jelly sandwich?!?” Nut allergy as stigma in comic books. Health Communication, 28(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.669671 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  44. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Monahan, J. L. (1995). Thinking positively: Using positive affect when designing health messages. In E. Maibach & R. L. Parrott (Eds.), Designing health messages: Approach- Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  45. es from communication theory and public health practice (pp. 81–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  46. Moyer-Gusé, E., Mahood, C., & Brookes, S. (2011). Entertainment-education in the con- text of humor: Effects on safer sex intentions and risk perceptions. Health Communi- cation, 26(8), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  47. Moyer-Gusé, E., Robinson, M. J., & McKnight, J. (2018). The Role of Humor in Messag- ing about the MMR Vaccine. Journal of Health Communication, 23(6), 514–522. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1473533 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  48. Mukherjee, A., & Dubé, L. (2012). Mixing emotions: The use of humor in fear advertising. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  49. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.389 Myrick, J. G. (2015). The role of emotions in preventative health communication. Lanham, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  50. MD: Lexington Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  51. Nabi, R. L. (2015). Emotional flow in persuasive health messages. Health Communication, 30(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974129 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  52. Nabi, R. L. (2016). Laughing in the face of fear (of disease detection): Using humor to promote cancer self-examination behavior. Health Communication, 31(7), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.1000479 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  53. Nabi, R. L. & Myrick, J. G. (2018). Uplifting fear appeals: Considering the role of hope in fear-based persuasive messages. Health Communication 34(4), 463–474. https://doi.or g/10.1080/10410236.2017.1422847 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  54. North, A. C., Mackenzie, L. C., Law, R. M. & Hargreaves, D. J. (2004). The Effects of mu- sical and voice “fit” on responses to advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychol- ogy, 34(8), 1675–1708. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02793.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  55. O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003. tb00292.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  56. Öhman, A. (2008). Fear and anxiety. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 709–729). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  57. Ort, A., & Fahr, A. (2018). Using efficacy cues in persuasive health communication is more effective than employing threats: An experimental study of a vaccination intervention against Ebola. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(3), 665–684. https://doi. org/10.1111/bjhp.12310 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  58. Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A., & Kok, G. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re- analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Re- view, 7(sup1), S8–S31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  59. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 124–181. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  60. Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 5–20. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  61. Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion. Theory, research, and experience (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  62. Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 925–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  63. Renaud, D., & Unz, D. (2006). Die M-DAS – eine modifizierte Version der Differentiellen Affekt Skala zur Erfassung von Emotionen bei der Mediennutzung [The M-DAS – a modified version of the Differential Affect Scale for measuring affective states in media reception]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 18(2), 70–75. https://doi. org/10.1026/1617-6383.18.2.70 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  64. Right Said Fred [Fairbrass, F., Fairbrass, R., Manzoli, R.] (1991). I’m too sexy. On I’m too sexy [CD]. United States: Charisma. https://open.spotify.com/track/2WElktskrNJEwgp p5Vouxk?si=BS65pXHJT5SHzkU60vp7zQ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  65. Rod Kommunikation (2014, August 18). Non, je ne regrette rien [Video file]. Retrieved from https:///www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRfoi6y4RiE Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  66. Ruiter, R. A. C., Kessels, L. T. E., Peters, G.-J. Y., & Kok, G. (2014). Sixty years of fear ap- peal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  67. Schramm, H., & Spangardt, B. (2016). Wirkung von Musik in der Werbung [The effect of music in advertising]. In G. Siegert, W. Wirth, P. Weber, & J. A. Lischka (Eds.), Hand- buch Werbeforschung (pp. 433–449). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-531-18916-1_19 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  68. Schwarz, U., & Hoffmann, S. (2009). Unter welchen Bedingungen ist humorvolle Werbung erfolgreich [Under what conditions is humorous advertising successful]? Wirtschaftswis- senschaftliches Studium (WiSt), 41(7), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.15358/0340-1650- Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  69. 2012-7-344 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  70. Schwarz, U., & Reifegerste, D. (2017). Humorappelle in der Gesundheitskommunikation [Humor appeals in health communication]. In C. Rossmann & M. R. Hastall (Eds.), Handbuch Gesundheitskommunikation: Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Perspek- tiven (pp. 1–12). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-658-10948-6_37-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  71. Shepperd, J. A., Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (2015). A primer on unre- alistic optimism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 232–237. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0963721414568341 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  72. Sjöberg, L., Moen, B.-E., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Trondheim, Norway: Rotunde. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  73. Speck, P. S. (1991). The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of hu- morous ads. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 13(1–2), 1–44. https://doi.org Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  74. /10.1080/01633392.1991.10504957 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  75. Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Al- barracín, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729 Västfjäll, D., & Slovic, P. (2013). Cognition and emotion in judgement and decision mak- ing. Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 252–271). New York, NY: Guilford Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  76. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  77. Vaucaire, M. & Dumont, C. (1961). Non, je ne regrette rien [Recorded by E. Piaf]. On Non, je ne regrette rien / Les Mots d’amour / Jérusalem [Vinyl]. Netherlands: Columbia (10th November 1960). https://open.spotify.com/track/3dkIE8P7hvl3tHl9KSb6dA?si=P eFji_6TQumilQeseEfqfg Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  78. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi. org/10.1080/03637759209376276 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  79. Witte, K. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1(4), 317–342. https://doi. org/10.1080/108107396127988 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  80. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615. https://doi. org/10.1177/109019810002700506 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  81. Yates, F. J., & Stone, E. R. (1992). The risk construct. In F. J. Yates (Ed.), Risk-taking be- havior (pp. 1–25). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  82. Yiend, J. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition & Emotion, 24(1), 3–47. https://doi. org/10.1080/02699930903205698 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  83. Yoon, H. J. (2015). Humor effects in shame-inducing health issue advertising: The moder- ating effects of fear of negative evaluation. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018463 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  84. World Health Organization (WHO).(2016). Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Re- trieved from https:///www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted- infections-(stis) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  85. < .001. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  86. Agarwal, R., & Rodhain, F. (2002). Mine or ours: email privacy expectations, employee attitudes, and perceived work environment characteristics. Proceedings of the 35th An- nual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994186 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  87. Bader, A., Fritz, G., & Gloning, T. (2012). Digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation 2010- 2011: Eine Online-Befragung [Digital science communication 2010-2011: An online survey]: Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek 2012. Retrieved from http://geb.uni-giessen. de/geb/volltexte/2012/8539/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  88. Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0573 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  89. Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., Smith, I., & Grinter, R. E. (2005). Quality versus quantity: E-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload. Human-Com- puter Interaction, 20(1–2), 89–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2005.9667362 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  90. Blasius, J. (2001). Korrespondenzanalyse [Correspondence analysis]. München, Wien, Old- enbourg: Oldenbourg Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  91. Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The Use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302552 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  92. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft [Social sense: Critique of theoretical reason]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  93. Bourdieu, P. (1995). Sozialer Raum und „Klassen“. Leçon sur la leçon. 2 Vorlesungen [So- cial space and “classes”. Leçon sur la leçon. 2 lectures]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  94. Burgess, A., Jackson, T., & Edwards, J. (2005). Email training significantly reduces email defects. International Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 71–83. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.10.004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  95. Cameron, A. F., & Webster, J. (2005). Unintended consequences of emerging communica- tion technologies: Instant Messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.12.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  96. Capra, R., Khanova, J., & Ramdeen, S. (2013). Work and personal e-mail use by univer- sity employees: PIM practices across domain boundaries. Journal of the American So- ciety for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1029–1044. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.22815 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  97. Cardon, P. W., & Marshall, B. (2015). The hype and reality of social media use for work collaboration and team communication. International Journal of Business Communi- cation, 52(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525446 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  98. Dressel, M. (2008). E-Mail-Knigge: Das Original [E-mail etiquette: The original]. Freital/ Dresden: WEB-GOLD-Akademie. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  99. Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Keaten, J. A. (2005). College faculty use and perceptions of elec- tronic mail to communicate with students. Communication Quarterly, 53(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500090118 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  100. Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., Smart, R., & Stevenson, M. (2014). Mobile technology and boundary permeability. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 570–588. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-8551.12027 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  101. Eddy, E., D’Abate, C., & Thurston, P. (2010). Explaining engagement in personal activities on company time. Personnel Review, 39(5), 639–654. https://doi. org/10.1108/00483481011064181 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  102. Enders, J. (2008). Professor werden ist sehr schwer, Professor sein dann gar nicht mehr? Ein Beitrag zur Personalstrukturreform an den Hochschulen [Becoming a professor is very difficult, being one is not? A contribution to the personnel structure reform at universities]. In H. Matthies & D. Simon (Eds.), Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung. Wis- senschaft unter Beobachtung: Effekte und Defekte von Evaluationen (pp. 83–98). Wiesbaden: Springer VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  103. Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of litera- ture from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The information society, 20(5), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974 Flick, S. (2013). Leben durcharbeiten: Selbstsorge in entgrenzten Arbeitsverhältnissen [Work through life: Self-care in unlimited employment relationships]. Frankfurt/New Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  104. York: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  105. Gillespie, N. A., Walsh, M., Winefield, A. H., Dua, J., & Stough, C. (2001). Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work & Stress, 15(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370117944 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  106. Glavin, P., & Schieman, S. (2012). Work-family role blurring and work-family conflict: The moderating influence of job resources and job demands. Work and Occupations, 39(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411406295 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  107. Gloning, T., & Fritz, G. (Eds.). (2011). Digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation: Formate und ihre Nutzung [Digital science communication: formats and their usage]. Gießen: Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  108. Hjavard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  109. Höflich, J. R. (2016). Der Mensch und seine Medien - Mediatisierte interpersonale Kom- munikation. Eine Einführung [Man and his media - Mediatized interpersonal commu- nication. An introduction]. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  110. Höhle, E. A., & Teichler, U. (2013). Determinants of academic job satisfaction in Germa- ny. In P. J. Bentley, H. Coates, I. Dobson, L. Goedegebuure, & V. L. Meek (Eds.), Job satisfaction around the academic world (pp. 125–143). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5434-8_7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  111. Ishii, K. (2005). The human side of the digital divide: Media experience as the border of communication satisfaction with email. Journal of Technical Writing & Communica- tion, 35(4), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.2190/CHEJ-2CW4-6BNY-9LRT Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  112. Jackson, T., Dawson, R., & Wilson, D. (2001). The cost of email interruption. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 5(1), 81–92. https://doi. org/10.1108/13287260180000760 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  113. Kelly, C., MacKinnon, R. A., McCrudden, M., & Tatham, N. (2015). You’ve got mail! Research report 2015. Retrieved from http://www.futureworkcentre.com/wp-content/ uploads/2015/07/FWC-Youve-got-mail-research-report.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  114. Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1752–1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121958023 Kozicka, P. (2016, May 27). After-work emails: banned in France, ‘a national epidemic’ in Canada. Global News Canada. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/2725886/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  115. after-work-emails-banned-in-france-a-national-epidemic-in-canada/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  116. Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of ‘mediatization’ as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665070030030103 Krotz, F. (2009). Mediatization. A concept with which to grasp media and societal change. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization. Concept, Changes, Consequences (pp. 21–40). New Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  117. York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  118. Kuckartz, U. (2012). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstüt- zung: [Qualitative content analysis: Methods, practice, computer assistance]. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Juventa. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  119. Kuehl, Rebecca, A., Westwick, Joshua, N., & Hunter, Karla, M. (2014). Y R U NOT RE- SPONDING – Teaching effective email communication. Journal of the Communica- tion, Speech, and Theatre Association of North Dakota, 27, 23–30. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  120. Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Com- puters in Human behavior, 43, 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  121. Lam, P. (2016). Academic email requests: A pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic compari- son between faculty and students. In F. Bianchi & S. Gesuato (Eds.), Pragmatic issues in specialized communicative contexts (pp. 127–146). Leiden, Boston, MA: Brill Ro- dopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004323902_008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  122. Lam, P. W. Y. (2014). Professional e-mail communication in higher education in Hong Kong: A case study. Text & Talk, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0041 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  123. Lüthje, C. (2017). Field-specific mediatization: Testing the combination of social theory and mediatization theory using the example of scientific communication. Mediatization Studies, 1, 45–67. Retrieved from http://journals.umcs.pl/ms/article/view/4789/pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  124. Mark, G. J., Voida, S., & Cardello, A. V. (2012). “A pace not dictated by electrons”: An empirical study of work without email. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  125. Markgraf, D. (2018). Arbeitswelten im Wandel 2018. Auswirkungen etablierter Kommuni- kationsmittel auf die Effizienz modernen Arbeitens [Working environments in transi- tion 2018: Effects of established means of communication on the efficiency of modern working]. Stuttgart, Germany: AKAD University – Hochschule Stuttgart. Retrieved from https://www.akad.de/fileadmin/content/Bilder_und_PDFs/5_Das_AKAD_Fern- studium/AKAD_University/Forschung_und_Wissenschaft_an_der_AKAD_University/ AKAD_Studien_002_-_Arbeitswelten_im_Wandel_-_Auswirkungen_etablierter_Kom- munikationsmittel.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  126. Matzat, U. (2009). The embeddedness of academic online groups in offline social networks. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  127. International Sociology, 24(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580908095911 Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  128. content analysis: Basics and techniques]. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  129. McCloskey, D. W. (2018). An examination of the boundary between work and home for knowledge workers. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Tech- nology Professionals, 9(3), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJHCITP.2018070102 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  130. Misoch, S. (2015). Qualitative Interviews [Qualitative interviews]. Berlin, München, Bos- ton: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110354614 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  131. Nippert-Eng, C. (1996). Calendars and keys: The classification of “home” and “work”. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  132. Sociological Forum, 11(3), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408393 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  133. Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2005). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of inte- gration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behav- ior, 68(3), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  134. Pscheida, D., Albrecht, S., Herbst, S., Minet, C., & Köhler, T. Nutzung von Social Media und onlinebasierten Anwendungen in der Wissenschaft: Erste Ergebnisse des Science 2.0-Survey 2013 des Leibniz-Forschungsverbunds „Science 2.0“ [Usage of social media and online-based applications in science: First results of the science 2.0 survey 2013 of the Leibniz research association “Science 2.0”]. Dresden: Technische Universität Dres- den. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-132962 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  135. The Radicati Group (2019). Email statistics report, 2019-2023. Retrieved from https:// www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Email-Statistics-Report- 2019-2023-Executive-Summary.pdf=AOvVaw18NHhYzfLWcFTirzuvs_w5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  136. Renaud, K., Ramsay, J., & Hair, M. (2006). “You’ve got e-mail!”…shall I deal with it now? Electronic mail from the recipient’s perspective. International Journal of Human- Computer Interaction, 21(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2103_3 Roth-Ebner, C. (2015). Der effiziente Mensch: Zur Dynamik von Raum und Zeit in media- tisierten Arbeitswelten [The efficient human being: On the dynamics of space and time Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  137. in mediatized working worlds]. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  138. Schmidt, J. H. (2018). Social Media [Social media]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-658-02096-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  139. Schmitt, J. B., Debbelt, C. A., & Schneider, F. M. (2018). Too much information? Predic- tors of information overload in the context of online news exposure. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1151–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/136911 8X.2017.1305427 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  140. Schneider, H. (2017). Verantwortung, Flexibilität und neue Freiräume im Job werden ge- schätzt – aber nicht von allen: Erste Ergebnisse der großen Arbeitsmarktstudie von IZA und XING [Responsibility, flexibility and new freedom in the job are appreciated - but not by everyone: First results of the large job market study by IZA and XING]. Re- trieved from https://newsroom.iza.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/20170330_Schnei- der_IZA_XING.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  141. Siegert, P. F. (2008). Die Geschichte der E-Mail: Erfolg und Krise eines Massenmediums [The history of the email: Success and crisis of a mass medium]. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  142. Song, H., Jung, J., & Kim, Y. (2017). Perceived news overload and its cognitive and attitu- dinal consequences for news usage in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communica- tion Quarterly, 94(4), 1172–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679975 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  143. Statista (2019). Durchschnittliche tägliche Nutzungsdauer von Kommunikationsmedien in Deutschland in den Jahren 2016 und 2019 [Average daily usage of communication media in Germany between 2016 and 2019]. Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/ statistik/daten/studie/616143/umfrage/taegliche-nutzungsdauer-von-kommunikations- medien-in-deutschland/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  144. Tang, J. C., Matthews, T., Cerruti, J., Dill, S., Wilcox, E., Schoudt, J., & Badenes, H. (2009). Global differences in attributes of email usage. In S. Fussell, P. Hinds, & T. Ishida (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collab- oration (p. 185). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1499224.1499252 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  145. Thiele, F. (2016). Der Einfluss des Feldes auf die Wissenschaftskommunikation: Eine Un- tersuchung des disziplin- und fachspezifischen Einsatzes von E-Publikationsformaten und sozialen Medien [The influence of the field on science communication: A study of the discipline- and subject-specific use of e-publication formats and social media]. In D. Bertel, J. Himmelsbach, & C. Krakovsky (Eds.), Junge Perspektiven auf Partizipation in Geschichte und Gegenwart: Beiträge zur ersten under.docs-Fachtagung zu Kommuni- kation. Wien, Austria: danzig & unfried. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  146. Thomas, G. F., King, C. L., Baroni, B., Cook, L., Keitelman, M., Miller, S., & Wardle, A. (2006). Reconceptualizing e-mail overload. Journal of Business and Technical Com- munication, 20(3), 252–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651906287253 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  147. Van den Hooff, B., & Jackson, T. (2006). Structuring e-mail communication in the work- place: Managing the users’ customization process. Annual Conference of the Interna- tional Communication Association (ICA), Dresden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  148. Vasagar, J. (2013, August 30). Out of hours working banned by German labour ministry. The Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ germany/10276815/Out-of-hours-working-banned-by-German-labour-ministry.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  149. Voß, G. G., & Pongratz, H. J. (1998). Der Arbeitskraftunternehmer. Eine neue Grundform der Ware Arbeitskraft? [The manpower entrepreneur. A new basic form of the commod- ity of manpower?]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 50, 131–158. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  150. Watts, L., & Ducheneaut, N. (2005). In search of coherence: A review of email research. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  151. Human-Computer Interaction. (Vol. 20, No. 1-2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  152. 024.2005.9667360 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  153. Weber, R. M., & Horn, B. D. (2011). Taming your inbox. Journal of Financial Service Pro- fessionals, July 2011, 33–36. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  154. Anderssohn, E., & Frost, F. (2013). The use values of smartphone apps. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  155. Baron, N. S. (2008). Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse con- trol. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 177–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  156. Bayer, J. B., Campbell, S. W., & Ling, R. (2016). Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory, 26(2), 128–149. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/comt.12090 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  157. Blom, J., Chittaranjan, G., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2011). Who’s who with big-five: Analyzing and classifying personality traits with smartphones. Lausanne, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.idiap.ch/~gatica/publications/ChittaranjanBlomGatica-iswc11.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  158. Brunnhofer, M., Platzer, E., Petrovic, O., & Rauch, W. (2010). Causes and consequences of mobile phone’s indispensability for everyday life: An experimental comparison to inter- net and TV. IEEE Computer Society, 251–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ ISWC.2011.29 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  159. Burchell, K. (2015). Tasking the everyday: Where mobile and online communication take time. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(1), 36–52. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/2050157914546711 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  160. Chui, R. C. F. (2014). Smartphone usage, social relations and life satisfaction of Hong Kong college students. In W. Ma, A. Yuen, J. Park, W. Lau, & L. Deng (Eds.), New me- dia, knowledge practices and multiliteracies 2015 (pp. 171–178). Singapore: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-209-8_16 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  161. Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhone separation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of Computer-Medi- ated Communication, 20, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12109 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  162. Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PA- NAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non- clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  163. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indi- cators Research, 31(2), 103–157. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  164. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403– 425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  165. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three dec- ades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  166. Elhai, J. D., Hall, B. J., Levine, J. C., & Dvorak, R.D. (2017). Types of smartphone usage and relations with problematic smartphone behaviors: The role of content consump- tion vs. social smartphone use. Cyperpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(2), article 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-2-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  167. European Social Survey. (2014). Questionnaire round 7, 2014/2015. Retrieved from http:// www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round7/questionnaire/ESS7_source_main_ques- tionnaire_final_alert_03.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  168. Gao, Y., Li, H., & Zhu, T. (2014). Predicting subjective well-being by smartphone usage behaviors. Proceedings from the International Conference on Health Informatics. HEALTHINF, 317–322. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  169. Google Play. (2016). Flipd: Distraction blocker. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/ store/apps/details?id=com.flipd.app&hl=de Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  170. Hefner, D., & Vorderer, P. (2017). Digital stress: Permanent connectedness and multitask- ing. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 237–249). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  171. Hoffner, C. A., & Lee, S. (2015). Mobile phone use, emotion regulation, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(7), 411–416. https://doi. org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0487 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  172. Hoffner C. A., Lee, S., & Park, S. J. (2016). “I miss my mobile phone!”: Self-expansion via mobile phone and responses to phone loss. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2452–2468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444815592665 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  173. Initiative 21. (2010). Die Digitale Gesellschaft in Deutschland – Sechs Nutzertypen im Vergleich [The digital society in Germany – six user types in comparison]. Retrieved from http://www.initiatived21.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Digitale-Gesellschaft_ Endfassung.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  174. International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal wellbeing index (5th ed.). Melbourne, Aus- tralia: The Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. Retrieved from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/pwi-a-english.pdf Kaun, A., & Schwarzenegger, C. (2014). “No media, less life?”: Online disconnection in Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  175. mediatized worlds. First Monday, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i11.5497 Kassambara, A. (2018). Machine learning essentials: Practical guide in R. CreateSpace In- Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  176. dependent Publishing Platform. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  177. Kohout, S. & Schumann, C. (2020, February 24). Measuring the associations between smartphone use and subjective well-being during normal use and a deprivation condi- tion: A hybrid feedback and elicitation diary combined with a qualitative interview guideline. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3685545 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  178. Kuckartz, U. (2010). Einführung in die computergestützte Analyse qualitativer Daten [In- troduction to computer assisted analysis of qualitative data] (3rd edition). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS, Verl. für Sozialwiss. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  179. Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. (2015). Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 220–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  180. LaRose, R. (2010). The problem of media habits. Communication Theory (10503293), 20(2), 194–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01360.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  181. LaRose, R., Connolly, R., Lee, H., Li, K., & Hales, K. D. (2014). Connection overload? A cross cultural study of the consequences of social media connection. Information Sys- tems Management, 31(1), 59–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.854097 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  182. Larsen, J. T., Hershfield, H. E., Stastny, B. J., & Hester, N. (2017). On the relationship be- tween positive and negative affect: Their correlation and their co-occurrence. Emotion, 17, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000231 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  183. Larsen, J. T., & McGraw, A. P. (2011). Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021846. supp Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  184. Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 684–696. https:// doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.4.684 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  185. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Com- puters in Human Behavior, 31, 343–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049 Licoppe, C. (2004). “Connected” presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for manag- ing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  186. Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 135–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d323t Ling, R. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into so- Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  187. ciety. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  188. Ling, R., & Lai, C. H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12251 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  189. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Meth- odology, 1, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  190. Mai, L. M., Freudenthaler, R., Schneider, F. M., & Vorderer, P. (2015): “I know you’ve seen it!” Individual and social factors for users’ chatting behavior on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.074 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  191. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(8), 522– 525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  192. Mastrolia, B. A. (1997). The media deprivation experience: Revealing mass media as both message and massage. Communication Education, 46(3), 203. https://doi. org/10.1080/03634529709379092 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  193. Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived informa- tion overload. Environment and Behavior, 44, 737–759. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0013916511404408 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  194. Nowland, R., Necka, E. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2017). Loneliness and social internet use: Pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  195. Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105–114. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  196. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  197. Reinecke, L., & Oliver, M. B. (2017). Media use and well-being: Status quo and open ques- tions. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  198. Rotondi, V., Stanca, L., & Tomasuolo, M. (2017). Connecting alone: Smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 17– 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.09.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  199. Ruhnau, J. (2016, February 25). Daran erkennen Sie, ob Sie handysüchtig sind [That is how you know that you are addicted to your cell phone]. Welt N24. Retrieved from https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/webwelt/article152633755/Daran-erkennen-Sie-ob-Sie- handysuechtig-sind.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  200. Sherman, L. E., Michikyan, M., & Greenfield, P. M. (2013). The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends. CyberPsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(2), Article 3. http://dx.doi. org/10.5817/CP2013-2-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  201. Schnauber, A. (2017). Medienselektion im Alltag [Media selection in daily life]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15441-7 Schnauber-Stockmann, A., Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2018). Procrastination out of habit? The role of impulsive versus reflective media selection in procrastinatory media use. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  202. Media Psychology, 21(4), 640–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1476156 Schimmack, U. (2003). Affect measurement in experience sampling research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 79–106. Retrieved from http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3psyuli/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  203. JH03AffectESM.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  204. Schimmack, U. (2007). Methodological issues in the assessment of the affective component of subjective well-being. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. Van Dulmen, (Eds.), Oxford hand- book of methods in positive psychology (pp. 96–110). Oxford, England: Oxford Uni- versity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  205. Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective wellbeing. The Science of Subjective Well-Being, 97–123. Retrieved from http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3psyuli/SWB- Structure.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  206. Stegmüller, D. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of fre- quentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 748–761. Trepte, S., & Scharkow, M. (2017). Friends and live-savers: How social capital and social support received in media environments contribute to well-being. In L. Reinecke & M. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  207. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 304–316). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  208. Vanden Abeele, M., de Wolf, R., & Ling, R. (2018). Mobile media and social space: How anytime, anyplace connectivity structures everyday life. Media and Communication, 6, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i2.1399 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  209. Verbrugge, K., Stevens, I., De Marez, L. (2013). Multifaceted companion devices: Applying the new model of media attendance to smartphone usage. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/df3e/53d5cc3b229d4d1e4686489824315093a004.pdf Vorderer, P., Krömer, N., & Schneider, F. (2016). Permanently online – permanently con- nected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 694–703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  210. chb.2016.05.085 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  211. Windahl, S., Höjerback, I., & Hedinsson, E. (1986). Adolescents without television: A study in media deprivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158609386607 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  212. Aronson, E (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  213. W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cogni- tive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago, Il: Rand McNally. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  214. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psycho- logical Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  215. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I. & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-es- teem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier life- styles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44. https://doi. org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  216. BAG (2019). Facts & figures: Tobacco. Retrieved from https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/ home/zahlen-und-statistiken/zahlen-fakten-zu-sucht/zahlen-fakten-zu-tabak.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  217. Blanc, N., & Brigaud, E. (2014). Humor in print health advertisements: Enhanced atten- tion, privileged recognition, and persuasiveness of preventive messages. Health Com- munication, 29, 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.769832 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  218. Brehm, J. W., & Brehm, S. S. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  219. Brockner, J., & Elkind, M. (1985). Self-esteem and reactance: Further evidence of attitudi- nal and motivational consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90035-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  220. CDC (2017). Health effects of cigarette smoking. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/to- bacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/index.htm Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  221. Cho, Y. J., Thrasher, J. F., Swayampakala, K., Yong, H. H., McKeever, R., Hammond, D., ... & Borland, R. (2016). Does reactance against cigarette warning labels matter? Warn- ing label responses and downstream smoking cessation amongst adult smokers in Aus- tralia, Canada, Mexico and the United States. PloS one, 11, 1–16. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159245 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  222. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its elicit role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03637750500111815 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  223. Erceg-Hurn, D., & Steed, L. (2011). Does exposure to cigarette health warnings elicit psy- chological reactance in smokers? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00710.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  224. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  225. Gibbons, F. X., Eggleston, T. J., & Benthin, A. C. (1997). Cognitive reactions to smoking relapse: The reciprocal relation between dissonance and self-esteem. Journal of Person- ality and Social Psychology, 72, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.184 Glock, S., & Kneer, J. (2009). Are deterrent pictures effective? The impact of warning la- bels on cognitive dissonance in smokers. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  226. 1, 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01019.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  227. Glock, S., Müller, B., & Ritter, S.M. (2012). Warning labels formulated as questions posi- tively influence smoking-related risk perception. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105312439734. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  228. Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 7–16. https://doi. org/10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  229. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analy- sis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  230. Hellman, C. M., & McMillin, W. L. (1997). The relationship between psychological reac- tance and self-esteem. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 135–138. https://doi. org/10.1080/00224549709595424 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  231. Huang, L. L., Thrasher, J. F., Abad, E. N., Cummings, K. M., Bansal-Travers, M., Brown, A., & Nagelhout, G. E. (2015). The US national Tips From Former Smokers antismok- ing campaign: promoting awareness of smoking-related risks, cessation resources, and cessation behaviors. Health Education & Behavior, 42, 480–486. https://doi. org/10.1177/1090198114564503 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  232. Joubert, C. E. (1990). Relationship among self-esteem, psychological reactance, and other personality variables. Psychological Reports, 66, 1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.2466/ pr0.1990.66.3c.1147 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  233. LaVoie, N. R., Quick, B. L., Riles, J. M., & Lambert, N. J. (2017). Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? A test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Communication Research, 44, 416–436. https://doi. org/10.1177/0093650215609669 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  234. Leary, M. R., & MacDonald, G. (2003). Individual differences in self-esteem: A review and theoretical integration. In M. R. Leary & J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and iden- tity (pp. 401–418). New York, NY: Guilford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  235. Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  236. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 119–186). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60091-X Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  237. Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A re- view and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psy- chology Compass, 5, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  238. McCaul, K. D., Hockemeyer, J. R., Johnson, R. J., Zetocha, K., Quinlan, K., & Glasgow, R. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  239. E. (2006). Motivation to quit using cigarettes: a review. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 42– 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.04.004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  240. Morita, A. (2007). Tobacco smoke causes premature skin aging. Journal of Dermatological Science, 48, 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.06.015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  241. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.379 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  242. Nabi, R. L. (2016). Laughing in the face of fear (of disease detection): Using humor to promote cancer self-examination behavior. Health Communication, 31, 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.1000479 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  243. Norman, P., Conner, M., & Bell, R. (1999). The theory of planned behavior and smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 18, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.89 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  244. Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7, 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  245. Peterson, A. A., Haynes, G. A., & Olson, J. M. (2008). Self-esteem differences in the effects of hypocrisy induction on behavioral intentions in the health domain. Journal of Per- sonality, 76, 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00487.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  246. Popova, L. (2012). The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39, 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111418108 Quick, B. L., Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance theory and persuasion. In J. P. Dil- lard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  247. and Practice (pp. 167–183). London, UK: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  248. Rahman, M. S., Mannan, M., & Rahman, M. M. (2018). The intention to quit smoking: The impact of susceptibility, self-efficacy, social norms and emotional intelligence embedded model. Health Education, 118, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-06-2017-0033 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  249. Renaud, D., & Unz, D. (2006). Die M-DAS-eine modifizierte Version der Differentiellen Affekt Skala zur Erfassung von Emotionen bei der Mediennutzung. [The MDAS – a modified version of the Differential Emotion Scale for the assessment of emotions in media use.] Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 18, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.18.2.70 Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  250. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni- Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  251. versity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  252. Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2, 354–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200405 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  253. Ruiter, R. A., Kessels, L. T., Peters, G. J. Y., & Kok, G. (2014). Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  254. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 1–36). Chichester, UK: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  255. Silvia, P. J. (2006). Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: Multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.309 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  256. Sowislo, J. F., & Orth, U. (2013). Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 213–240. http://dx. doi.org/10.1037/a0028931 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  257. Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Al- barracín, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  258. Tobacco Products Directive (2014). Tobacco Products Directive (2014/40/EU). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/law/pictorial_en (13.02.2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  259. Thrasher, J. F., Swayampakala, K., Borland, R., Nagelhout, G., Yong, H. H., Hammond, D., Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  260. ... & Hardin, J. (2016). Influences of self-efficacy, response efficacy, and reactance on responses to cigarette health warnings: a longitudinal study of adult smokers in Aus- tralia and Canada. Health Communication, 31, 1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 0410236.2015.1089456 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  261. Tyc, V. L., Lensing, S., Rai, S. N., Klosky, J. L., Stewart, D. B., & Gattuso, J. (2006). Pre- dicting perceived vulnerability to tobacco-related health risks and future intentions to use tobacco among pediatric cancer survivors. Patient Education and Counseling, 62, 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  262. Van Dellen, M. R., Campbell, W. K., Hoyle, R. H. & Bradfield, E. K. (2011). Compensat- ing, resisting, and breaking: A meta-analytic examination of reactions to self-esteem threat. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 51–74. https://doi. org/10.1177/1088868310372950 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  263. van ‘t Riet, J., & Ruiter, R. A. (2013). Defensive reactions to health-promoting informa- tion: An overview and implications for future research. Health Psychology Review, 7, 104–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2011.606782 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  264. Velicer, W. F., DiClemente, C. C., Rossi, J. S., & Prochaska, J. O. (1990). Relapse situations and self-efficacy: An integrative model. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 271–283. https://doi. org/10.1016/0306-4603(90) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  265. Wakefield, M., Freeman, J., & Donovan, R. (2003). Recall and response of smokers and recent quitters to the Australian National Tobacco Campaign. Tobacco control, 12, ii15–ii22. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.suppl_2.ii15 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  266. Weinstein, N. D., Marcus, S. E., & Moser, R. P. (2005). Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tobacco Control, 14, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.008375 World Health Organization (2016). Smoking & tobacco use. Retrieved from https://www. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  267. cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/index.htm (23.01.2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  268. White, V., Bariola, E., Faulkner, A., Coomber, K., & Wakefield, M. (2014). Graphic health warnings on cigarette packs: how long before the effects on adolescents wear out?. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17, 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu184 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  269. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59, 329–349. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03637759209376276 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  270. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals. Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591–615. https://doi. org/10.1177/109019810002700506 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  271. Wong, N. C., & Cappella, J. N. (2009). Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802593928 Xu, J. (2015). Designing messages with high sensation value: when activation meets reac- tance. Psychology & Health, 30, 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.97 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  272. 7280 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  273. Ahmed, S., & Matthes, J. (2017). Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. International Communication Gazette, 79, 219–244. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  274. Arlt, H. J., Storz, W., Wallraff, G., & Simon, U. (2011). Drucksache „Bild“ – Eine Marke und ihre Mägde. Die „Bild“-Darstellung der Griechenland- und Eurokrise 2010 [Print- ed matter „Bild“ – A brand and its maids. The “Bild” presentation of the Greek and Euro crisis 2010]. Abgerufen von: https://www.otto-brenner-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_data/stiftung/02_Wissenschaftsportal/02_Infoseiten/Bild_Studien/01_Drucksache_Bild/ AH_Bild_TeilIV_punkt7.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  275. Aslan, E., Akkılıç, E. E., & Hämmerle, M. (2017). Islamistische Radikalisierung: biografis- che Verläufe im Kontext der religiösen Sozialisation und des radikalen Milieu [sic] [Is- lamist radicalization: Biographical developments in the context of religious socializa- tion and the radical milieu]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  276. Beck, U. (2015). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne [Risk society. On the way to a different modernity]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  277. Bierhoff, H.-W., & Frey, D. (2011). Sozialpsychologie – Individuum und soziale Welt [So- cial psychology – individual and social world]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  278. Bild (26. März 2018). Islamismus-Alarm an Berliner Grundschulen. Morddrohungen ge- gen ‚ungläubige‘ Kinder [Islamism alarm at Berlin elementary schools. Death threats against ‘unbelieving’ children]. Bild, S.1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  279. Blum, R. (2011). Leidende Leuchttürme. Über die Unentbehrlichkeit von Qualitätsmedien [Suffering lighthouses. About the indispensability of quality media]. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof, & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommu- nikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 7–15). Wiesbaden, Ger- many: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  280. Bruck, P. A., & Stocker, G. (1996). Die ganz normale Vielfältigkeit des Lesens: zur Rezep- tion von Boulevardzeitungen [The normal diversity of reading: On the reception of tabloid newspapers] (Vol. 23). Münster, Germany: LIT. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  281. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2019). Zahlen zur salafistischen Szene in Deutschland [Figures on the Salafist scene in Germany]. Redaktion Infodienst Radikalisierungspräven- tion am 08.01.2019. Abgerufen von https://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/radika- lisierungspraevention/265409/ zahlen-zur-salafistischen-szene-in-deutschland Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  282. D’Angelo, P., Lule, J., Neuman, W. R., Rodriguez, L., Dimitrova, D. V., & Carragee, K. M. (2019). Beyond framing: A forum for framing researchers. Journalism & Mass Com- munication Quarterly, 96 (1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018825004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  283. Dantschke, C. (2017). Attraktivität, Anziehungskraft und Akteure des politischen und mil- itanten Salafismus in Deutschland [Attractiveness, attraction and actors of political and militant Salafism in Germany]. In A. Toprak & G. Weitzel (Hrsg.), Salafismus in Deutschland. Jugendkulturelle Aspekte, pädagigische Perspektiven (S. 61–76). Wies- baden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  284. Donsbach, W., & Büttner, K. (2005). Boulevardisierungstrend in deutschen Fernsehnach- richten [Boulevardization trend in German television news]. Publizistik, 50, 21–38. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  285. Drews, J. (2018). Risikokommunikation und Krisenkommunikation. Kommunikation von Behörden und die Erwartungen von Journalisten [Risk communication and crisis com- munication. Communication of authorities and the expectations of journalists]. Wies- baden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  286. Dulinski, U. (2003). Sensationsjournalismus in Deutschland [Sensational journalism in Germany]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  287. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  288. Epkins, H. D. (2017). Covering acts of terrorism. In P. Robinson, P. M. Seib, & R. Fröhlich (Hrsg.), Routledge Handbook of Media, Conflict and Security (S. 255–270). London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  289. Esser, F. (1999). ‚Tabloidization’ of News. A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14, 291–324. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  290. Focus (02. Februar 2009). Die deutsche Islamisten-AG. Wie Fanatiker den Terror planen [The German Islamist Association. How fanatics plan terror]. Focus, S. 1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  291. Frindte, W., & Haußecker, N. (2010). Inszenierter Terrorismus: mediale Konstruktionen und individuelle Interpretationen [Staged terrorism: Media constructions and individ- ual interpretations]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  292. Früh, W. (2004). Inhaltsanalyse. Theorie und Praxis [Content analysis. Theory and prac- tice]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  293. Früh, W., & Frey, F. (2014). Narration und Storytelling: Theorie und empirische Befunde [Narration and storytelling: Theory and empirical findings]. Köln, Germany: Herbert von Halem. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  294. Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2015). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25, 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12048 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  295. Geise, S., Lobinger, K., & Brantner, C. (2013). Fractured Paradigm? Theorien, Konzepte und Methoden der visuellen Framingforschung. Ergebnisse einer systematischen Litera- turschau [Fractured Paradigm? Theories, concepts and methods of visual framing re- search. Results of a systematic literature review]. In S. Geise & K. Lobinger (Hrsg.), Visual Framing. Perspektiven und Herausforderungen der Visuellen Kommunikations- forschung (S. 41–75). Köln, Germany: Herbert von Halem. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  296. Gerhards, J., Schäfer, M. S., Al Jabiri, I., & Seifert, J. (2011). Terrorismus im Fernsehen: Formate, Inhalte und Emotionen in westlichen und arabischen Sendern [Terrorism on television: Formats, contents and emotions in Western and Arabic channels]. Wies- baden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  297. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: The University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  298. Glaab, S. (2007). Medien und Terrorismus: auf den Spuren einer symbiotischen Beziehung [Media and terrorism: On the tracks of a symbiotic relationship]. Berlin, Germany: BWV Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  299. Hafez, K., & Richter, C. (2008). Das Islambild von ARD und ZDF. Themenstrukturen einer Negativagenda [The image of Islam of ARD and ZDF. Thematic structures of a negative agenda]. Der Fachjournalist, 8, 10–16. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  300. Hagen, L. (1992). Die opportunen Zeugen. Konstruktionsmechanismen von Bias in der Zeitungsberichterstattung über die Volkszählungsdiskussion [The opportune witnesses. Construction mechanisms of bias in newspaper coverage of the census debate]. Pub- lizistik, 37, 444–460. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  301. Haim, M. (2019). Die Orientierung von Online-Journalismus an seinen Publika. Anforder- ung, Antizipation, Anspruch [The orientation of online journalism towards its audi- ences. Requirement, anticipation, demand]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  302. Heeren, J., & Zick, A. (2014). Misleading images. Results from interviews with media pro- ducers, journalists and consumers on Muslims and Islam in Germany. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 7, 46–63. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  303. Hertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), LEA’s communica-tion series. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 139–161). New York, USA: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  304. Holicki, S. (1993). Pressefoto und Pressetext im Wirkungsvergleich: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung am Beispiel von Politikerdarstellungen [Press photo and press text in a comparison of effects: An experimental study using the example of politicians]. München, Germany: Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  305. Hummel, K., & Loginov, M. (Hrsg.) (2015). Gefährliche Nähe: Salafismus und Dschihad- ismus in Deutschland [Dangerous proximity: Salafism and Jihadism in Germany]. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  306. Jirschitzka, J., Haußecker, N., & Frindte, W. (2010). Mediale Konstruktion II: Die Kon- struktion des Terrorismus im deutschen Fernsehen – Ergebnisdarstellung und Interpre- tation [Media Construction II: The construction of terrorism in German television – presentation and interpretation of results]. In W. Frindte & N. Haußecker (Hrsg.), Inszenierter Terrorismus: mediale Konstruktionen und individuelle Interpreta- tionen (S. 81–119). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  307. Kepplinger, H. M. (1989). Instrumentelle Aktualisierung: Grundlagen einer Theorie pub- lizistischer Konflikte [Opinion formation: Fundamentals of a theory of journalistic conflicts]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 29, 199–220. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  308. Kepplinger, H. M. (2011). Journalismus als Beruf [Journalism as profession]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  309. Kiousis, S. (2004). Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 U. S. Presidential Election. Journal of Communication, 54, 71–87. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  310. Kösters, R., & Friedrich, K. (2017). Doch mehr als Klatsch und Tratsch? [More than just gossip?]. In O. Jandura, M. Wendelin, M. Adolf, & J. Wimmer (Hrsg.), Zwischen Inte- gration und Diversifikation. Medien – Kultur – Kommunikation (S. 245–261). Wies- baden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  311. Krohne, H. W. (2010). Psychologie der Angst: Ein Lehrbuch [Psychology of fear: A text- book]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  312. Krone.at (2019). Reichweiten-Erfolg. „Krone“: Auch online die meisten Leser! [Reach suc- cess. “Krone”: Most readers online too!] Abgerufen von https://www.krone.at/1897096 Landmeier, C., & Daschmann, G. (2011). Im Seichten kann man nicht ertrinken? Boule- vardisierung in der überregionalen deutschen Qualitätspresse [You can‘t drown in shal- low water? Boulevardisation in the national German quality press]. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof, & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommu- nikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 177–191). Wiesbaden, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  313. Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  314. Lobinger, K. (2012). Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung: Medienbilder als Herausforder- ung für die Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Medien – Kultur – Kommuni- kation [Visual communication research: Media images as a challenge for communica- tion and media science. Media – Culture – Communication]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93480-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  315. Lünenborg, M. (2005). Journalismus als kultureller Prozess: Zur Bedeutung von Journalismus in der Mediengesellschaft. Ein Entwurf [Journalism as a cultural process: On the signifi- cance of journalism in the media society. A draft]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  316. Martinsen, R. (2009). Öffentlichkeit in der „Mediendemokratie“ aus der Perspektive konkurrierender Demokratietheorien [Public sphere in “media democracy” from the perspective of competing theories of democracy]. In F. Marcinkowski & B. Pfetsch (Hrsg.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie (Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 42, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  317. S. 37–69). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Matthes, J. (2014). Framing. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  318. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2004). Die empirische Erfassung von Medien-frames [The empirical measurement of media frames]. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissen- schaft, 52, 56–75. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  319. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative con- tent analysis. Basics and techniques]. Weinheim und Basel, Germany/Switzerland: Beltz. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  320. Media Analyse (2018). MA 2018 Presse [MA 2018 print]. Abgerufen von https://www. media-analyse.at/admin/pages/htmlTemplateTable.php?xyC at=402819,402820,402821,402822,402823,402824,402825,402909,402910,402913 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  321. ,402928,402955 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  322. Neidhardt, F., & Rucht, D. (1993). Auf dem Weg in die „Bewegungsgesellschaft“? Über die Stabilisierbarkeit sozialer Bewegungen [On the way to the “movement society”? On the stabilisation of social movements]. Soziale Welt, 305–326. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  323. Neumann, P. R. (2016). Der Terror ist unter uns. Dschihadismus und Radikalisierung in Europa [The terror is among us. Jihadism and radicalisation in Europe]. Berlin, Ger- many: Ullstein. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  324. Neumann, K. (2019). Medien und Islamismus. Der Einfluss von Medienberichterstattung und Propaganda auf islamistische Radikalisierungsprozesse [Media and Islamism. The influence of media coverage and propaganda on Islamist radicalization processes]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  325. ÖWA Plus (2019). Medienanalyse 2019-II [Media analysis 2019-II]. Abgerufen von http:// www.oewa.at/plus/medienanalyse Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  326. Ohliger, U. (2019). Kennzeichen und Wandel der Politikberichterstattung im Boulevard- journalismus [Characteristics and change of political reporting in tabloid journalism]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  327. Papacharissi, Z., & Fatima Oliveira, M. (2008). News frames terrorism: A comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in US and UK newspapers. The In- ternational Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 52–74. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  328. Patterson, T. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good. KSG working paper 01-001. Online abgerufen von https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=257395 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  329. Pentzold, C., & Fraas, C. (2018). Verbale und visuelle Medienframes im Verfahrensrahmen der Grounded Theory analysieren. Methodologische Grundlagen, Methoden und Forschungspraxis deduktiven und induktiven Kodierens multimodaler Dokumente [Ana- lyse verbal and visual media frames within the procedural framework of Grounded The- ory. Methodological foundations, methods and research practice of deductive and induc- tive coding of multimodal documents]. In A. M. Scheu (Hg.), Auswertung qualitativer Daten. Strategien, Verfahren und Methoden der Interpretation nicht-standardisierter Daten in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 227–243). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer. Pfahl-Traughber, A. (2008). Islamismus – der neue Extremismus, Faschismus, Fundamen- talismus und Totalitarismus? Eine Erörterung zu Angemessenheit und Erklärungskraft der Zuordnungen [Islamism – the new extremism, fascism, fundamentalism and totali-tarianism? A discussion on the appropriateness and explanatory power of the attribu- tions]. Zeitschrift für Politik, 55, 33–48. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  330. Pörksen, B. (2015). Die Beobachtung des Beobachters. Eine Erkenntnistheorie der Journal- istik [The observation of the observer. An epistemology of journalism]. Heidelberg, Germany: Carl Auer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  331. Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S., & Legnante, G. (2011). From hard vs. soft to a mul- ti-dimensional approach. Towards a standardized definition and measurement of dif- ferent types of news. Journalism, 13, 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  332. Renger, R. (2000). Populärer Journalismus. Nachrichten zwischen Fakten und Fiktion [Pop- ular journalism. News between fact and fiction]. Innsbruck, Austria: Studien-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  333. Renner, K. N., & Schupp, K. (2017). Journalismus [Journalism]. In M. Martínez (Hg.), Erzählen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (S. 122–132). Stuttgart, Germany: J. B. Met- zler Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  334. Rossmann, C., & Brosius, H. B. (2013). Die Risiken der Risikokommunikation und die Rolle der Massenmedien [The risks of risk communication and the role of the mass me- dia]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 56, 118–123. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  335. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  336. Scheufele, B., & Engelmann, I. (2016). Framing und Journalismus [Framing and journal- ism]. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 443–456). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  337. Schirmer, S. (2001). Die Titelseiten-Aufmacher der BILD-Zeitung im Wandel. Eine Inhalt- sanalyse unter Berücksichtigung von Merkmalen journalistischer Qualität [The front page headlines of the BILD newspaper in transition. A content analysis taking into ac- count characteristics of journalistic quality]. München, Germany: R. Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  338. Schulz, W. (1976). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien. Analyse der aktuellen Berichterstattung [The construction of reality in the news media. Analysis of current reporting]. Freiburg, München, Germany: Alber. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  339. Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549-570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  340. Slovic, P. (Hg.). (2000). Risk, society, and policy series. The perception of risk. London, England: Earthscan Publications. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  341. Staab, J. F. (1990): Nachrichtenwerttheorie: Formale Struktur und empirischer Gehalt [Message value theory: formal structure and empirical content]. Freiburg, München, Germany: Alber. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  342. Steinmaurer, T. (2012). Medien und Medienpolitik in Österreich – ein Überblick [Media and media politics in Austria – an overview]. Abgerufen von http://www.politischebil- dung.com/pdfs/35steinmaurer.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  343. Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press cover- age of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20 (4), 484–507. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  344. Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & De Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication research, 26, 550–569. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  345. von Sikorski, C., Matthes, J., & Schmuck, D. (2018). The Islamic State in the news: Journal- istic differentiation of Islamist terrorism from Islam, terror news proximity, and Islamo- phobic attitudes. Communication Research, https://doi.org/0093650218803276. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  346. von Sikorski, C., Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Binder, A. (2017). “Muslims are not Terror- ists”: Islamic State coverage, journalistic differentiation between terrorism and Islam, fear reactions, and attitudes toward Muslims. Mass Communication and Society, 20, 825–848. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  347. Wälder, K., & Wälder, O. (2017). Methoden zur Risikomodellierung und des Risikomana- gements [Methods of risk modelling and the risk management]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  348. Wendelin, M., Engelmann, I., & Neubarth, J. (2017). User Rankings and Journalistic News Selection. Journalism Studies, 18, 135–153, https://doi.org/10.1080/146167 0X.2015.1040892. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  349. Quellen Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  350. B3: https://www.krone.at/545258 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B47: https://www.krone.at/603609 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B41: https://www.krone.at/480939 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B124: https://www.krone.at/422810 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B136: https://www.krone.at/429587 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B214: https://www.krone.at/1685984 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B206: https://www.krone.at/1907722 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B115: https://www.krone.at/429266 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B211: https://www.krone.at/1691554 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B67: https://www.krone.at/549888 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B111: https://www.krone.at/582006 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B210: https://www.krone.at/1819894 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B5: https://www.krone.at/603105 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B188: https://www.krone.at/599350 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B127: https://www.krone.at/1819324 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B208: https://www.krone.at/1877670 [nicht mehr verfügbar, 23.08.2020] B73: https://www.krone.at/1876494 [nicht mehr verfügbar, 23.08.2020] B45: https://www.krone.at/594485 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  351. B96: https://www.krone.at/550201 [nicht mehr vollständig verfügbar, 23.08.2020] B130: https://www.krone.at/484405 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  352. B98: https://www.krone.at/439228 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B93: https://www.krone.at/425187 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B166: https://www.krone.at/1608661 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B31: https://www.krone.at/1686147 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B48: https://www.krone.at/601586 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B78: https://www.krone.at/509740 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B66: https://www.krone.at/551029 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B146: https://www.krone.at/410063 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B36: https://www.krone.at/1751886 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B100: https://www.krone.at/465836 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B90: https://www.krone.at/426148 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B1: https://www.krone.at/1724076 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B30: https://www.krone.at/1713999 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  353. B19: https://www.krone.at/533063 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B40: https://www.krone.at/1669361 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B32: https://www.krone.at/522971 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B50: https://www.krone.at/1662117 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B107: https://www.krone.at/483895 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B25: https://www.krone.at/484136 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B177: https://www.krone.at/422295 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B2: https://www.krone.at/595540 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B157: https://www.krone.at/598704 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B181: https://www.krone.at/550602 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B140: https://www.krone.at/1891313 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B14: https://www.krone.at/585126 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B65: https://www.krone.at/566686 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B11: https://www.krone.at/419351 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B1: https://www.krone.at/1724076 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B199: https://www.krone.at/534453 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien