“The morass is just getting ... deeper and deeper and deeper”: Synthetic media and news integrity

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos


Cover der Ausgabe: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Jahrgang 14 (2025), Heft 4
Open Access Vollzugriff

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Jahrgang 14 (2025), Heft 4


Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Kapitelinformationen


Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 14 (2025), Heft 4

“The morass is just getting ... deeper and deeper and deeper”: Synthetic media and news integrity


Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007


Kapitelvorschau:

Seit dem Aufkommen generativer KI (genKI) im Jahr 2022 erlebt die Nachrichtenindustrie Wellen der Begeisterung wie auch Besorgnis. Wenn auch die Herausforderungen und Möglichkeiten synthetischer Medien für Nachrichten real sind, erweisen sich diese als weniger aufregend als erwartet. Im Beitrag wird eine qualitative Studie in zwei Phasen vorgestellt, die untersucht, wie sich diese Herausforderungen und Möglichkeiten in australischen Nachrichtenreaktionen entfalten. Dabei fokussieren wir uns auf: 1) Wie wenden Redaktionen genKI in der Produktion synthetischer Medien an? 2) Wie nehmen Redaktionen potenzielle Auswirkungen synthetischer Medien auf die Nachrichtenintegrität wahr? 3) Wie beeinflussen diese Auswirkungen die Anwendung von genKI, insbesondere für synthetische Medien? Erhebungen innerhalb der Industrie haben gezeigt, dass der Einsatz von genKI in australischen Nachrichtenredaktionen gering ist. In Phase 1 konnten wir feststellen, dass kaum genKI zur Produktion synthetischer Medien verwendet wurde, was auf Bedenken hinsichtlich technischer Begrenzungen wie auch Bewusstsein über die Gefährdung von Vertrauen und Nachrichtenintegrität hindeutet. Phase 2 deutet zwar auf das Aufkommen weniger risikoreicher Möglichkeiten hin, wenn auch die Anwendung in publikumsorientierten Inhalten weiterhin begrenzt blieb und Teilnehmende nach wie vor Besorgnisse hinsichtlich der Nachrichtenintegrität und des Vertrauens des Publikums äußerten. Zur Interpretation der Aussagen der Teilnehmenden wenden wir sowohl eine technologische Prozessperspektive als auch eine normative Perspektive an, die auf das Konzept der Nachrichtenintegrität fokussiert ist. Wir schließen daraus, dass die begrenzte Anwendung von genKI in australischen Redaktionen auf Bedenken hinsichtlich der Nachrichtenintegrität zurückzuführen ist. Diese Bedenken gehen über journalistische Standards hinaus und umfassen sowohl die sozio-politischen Funktionen des Journalismus als auch Sorgen über die anhaltende Plattformisierung der Medienökonomie und ein zunehmend degradiertes Informationsumfeld.

Literaturverzeichnis


  1. 9News staff. (2024, March 7). 9ExPress. 9News. https://www.9news.com.au/technology/9express/16480c33-636a-461f-9c4f-d0e2522c722a Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Ananny, M., & Karr, J. (2025). How media unions stabilize technological hype: Tracing organized journalism’s discursive constructions of generative artificial intelligence. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2454516 Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Attard, M., Davis, M., & Main, L. (2023). Gen AI and journalism. UTS Centre for Media Transition. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24751881.v3 Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Australian Communications and Media Authority. (n.d.). Local content on regional commercial radio. Retrieved April 24, 2025, from https://www.acma.gov.au/local-content-­regional-commercial-radio Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. (2019). Digital platforms inquiry final report. https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/publications/digital-platforms-inquiry-final-report Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Australian Press Council. (2023, August). Submission to the Department of Industry, Transport, Regional Development and Communications on the Exposure Draft of the Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023 (sub. E3250). https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/acma2023-e3250-australian-press-council.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Avishai, T. (Director). (2023, December 4). Synthetic media: AI and journalism (No. 6) [Broadcast]. In Knowing Machines. https://engelberg-center-live.simplecast.com/episodes/synthetic-media-ai-and-journalism Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Bäck, A., Diakopoulos, N., Granroth-Wilding, M., Haapanen, L., Leppänen, L. J., Melin, M., Moring, T. A., Munezero, M. D., Siren-Heikel, S. J., Södergård, C., & Toivonen, H. (2019). News automation: The rewards, risks and realities of “machine journalism.” World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers, WAN-IFRA. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Bagozzi, R. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00122 Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Barnes, C., & Barraclough, T. (2020). Deepfakes and synthetic media. In R. Steff, J. Burton, & S. R. Soare (Eds.), Emerging Technologies and International Security: Machines, the State, and War (pp. 206–222). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808846 Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Becker, K. B., Simon, F. M., & Crum, C. (2025). Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations. Digital Journalism, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2431519 Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Beckett, C., & Yaseen, M. (2023). Generating change: The journalism AI report. Polis, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://www.journalismai.info/s/Generating-Change-_-The-Journalism-AI-report-_-English.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Borchardt, A., Simon, F., Zachrison, O., Bremme, K., Kurczabinska, J., Mulhall, E., & Johanny, Y. (2024). Trusted journalism in the age of generative AI. European Broadcasting Union. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c874e2e-34de-4813-ba23-84e6300af110 Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Borden, S. L., & Tew, C. (2007). The role of journalist and the performance of journalism: Ethical lessons from “fake” news (seriously). Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(4), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520701583586 Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Broussard, M., Diakopoulos, N., Guzman, A. L., Abebe, R., Dupagne, M., & Chuan, C.-H. (2019). Artificial intelligence and journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019859901 Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Cazzamatta, R., & Sarısakaloğlu, A. (2025). Mapping global emerging scholarly research and practices of AI-supported fact-checking tools in journalism. Journalism Practice, 19(10), 2422–2444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2025.2463470 Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Center for News, Technology & Innovation. (2025). What it means to do journalism in the age of AI: Journalist views on safety, technology and government. https://innovating.news/2024-journalist-survey/ Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2018). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954 Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Cools, H., & Diakopoulos, N. (2024). Uses of generative AI in the newsroom: Mapping journalists’ perceptions of perils and possibilities. Journalism Practice, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2394558 Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Cools, H., & Koliska, M. (2024). News automation and algorithmic transparency in the newsroom: The case of the Washington Post. Journalism Studies, 25(6), 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2326636 Google Scholar öffnen
  21. de-Lima-Santos, M.-F., Yeung, W. N., & Dodds, T. (2024). Guiding the way: A comprehensive examination of AI guidelines in global media. AI & Society, 40, 2585–2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01973-5 Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Diakopoulos, N., Cools, H., Li, C., Helberger, N., Kung, E., Rinehart, A., & Gibbs, L. (2024). Generative AI in journalism: The evolution of newswork and ethics in a generative information ecosystem. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31540.05765 Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Dodds, T., Zamith, R., & Lewis, S. C. (2025). The AI turn in journalism: Disruption, adaptation, and democratic futures. Journalism. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251343518 Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Dunstan, J., & Ortolan, M. (2024, January 31). An AI-generated image of a Victorian MP raises wider questions on digital ethics. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440 Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Eder, M., & Sjøvaag, H. (2025). Falling behind the adoption curve: Local journalism’s struggle for innovation in the AI transformation. Journal of Media Business Studies, 22(4), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2025.2473301 Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Elbeyi, E., Bruhn Jensen, K., Aronczyk, M., Asuka, J., Ceylan, G., Cook, J., Erdelyi, G., Ford, H., Milani, C., Mustafaraj, E., Ogenga, F., Yadin, S., Howard, P. N., Valenzuela, S., Brulle, R., Jacquet, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Roberts, T. (2025). Information integrity about climate science: A systematic review. International Panel on the Information Environment (IPIE). https://doi.org/10.61452/BTZP3426 Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 Google Scholar öffnen
  29. European Broadcasting Union. (2025, May 5). Media outlets worldwide join call for AI companies to help protect news integrity. https://www.ebu.ch/news/2025/05/media-outlets-worldwide-join-call-for-ai-companies-to-help-protect-news-integrity Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Farhi, P. (2023, January 17). CNET used AI to write articles. It was a journalistic disaster. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/01/17/cnet-ai-articles-journalism-corrections/ Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Feher, K. (2024). Exploring AI media. Definitions, conceptual model, research agenda. Journal of Media Business Studies, 21(4), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2024.2340419 Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Ferrucci, P., & Perreault, G. (2021). The liability of newness: Journalism, innovation and the issue of core competencies. Journalism Studies, 22(11), 1436–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1916777 Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Furtáková, L., & Janáčková, Ľ. (2023). AI in radio: The game changer you did not hear coming. In M. Prostináková Hossová, M. Martovič, & M. Solík (Eds.), Marketing identity: AI – The future of today. Proceedings from the International Scientific Conference. University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius. https://mmidentity.fmk.sk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/MM_2023_eng.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (2022). The political economy of contemporary journalism and the crisis of public knowledge. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism (2nd ed., pp. 36–45). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003174790-5 Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Gutierrez Lopez, M., Porlezza, C., Cooper, G., Makri, S., MacFarlane, A., & Missaoui, S. (2023). A question of design: Strategies for embedding AI-driven tools into journalistic work routines. Digital Journalism, 11(3), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2043759 Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Gutiérrez-Caneda, B., Lindén, C.-G., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2024). Ethics and journalistic challenges in the age of artificial intelligence: Talking with professionals and experts. Frontiers in Communication, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1465178 Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Hall, C. J. (2025). Platform journalism on YouTube: A democratic functions approach to analysing journalism on digital platforms. Australian Journalism Review, 47(1), 97–115. ­https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00178_7 Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Harris, K. R. (2024). Synthetic media detection, the wheel, and the burden of proof. Philosophy & Technology, 37(131). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00821-0 Google Scholar öffnen
  39. He, X., & Fang, L. (2024). Regulatory challenges in synthetic media governance: Policy frameworks for AI-generated content across image, video, and social platforms. Journal of Robotic Process Automation, AI Integration, and Workflow Optimization, 9(12), 36–54. https://helexscience.com/index.php/JRPAAIW/article/view/2024-12-13 Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Helberger, N., van Drunen, M., Moeller, J., Vrijenhoek, S., & Eskens, S. (2022). Towards a normative perspective on journalistic AI: Embracing the messy reality of normative ideals. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1605–1626. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2152195 Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Hermida, A. (2015). Nothing but the truth: Redrafting the journalistic boundary of verification. In M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (Eds.), Boundaries of Journalism (pp. 37–50). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Jones, B., Jones, R., & Luger, E. (2022). AI ‘everywhere and nowhere’: Addressing the AI intelligibility problem in public service journalism. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1731–1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2145328 Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Jones, B., Jones, R., & Luger, E. (2023). Generative AI & journalism: A rapid risk-based review. University of Edinburgh. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/generative-ai-amp-journalism-a-rapid-risk-based-review Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Kieran, M. (1998). Objectivity, impartiality and good journalism. In M. Kieran (Ed.), Media Ethics (1st ed., pp. 23–36). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Lin, B., & Lewis, S. C. (2022). The one thing journalistic AI just might do for democracy. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2084131 Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Lindén, T. C.-G., & Dierickx, L. (2019). Robot journalism: The damage done by a metaphor. Unmediated, 2, 152–155. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Mahadevan, A. (2025, March 20). An Italian newspaper launched a generative AI experiment. It’s not going well. Poynter. https://www.poynter.org/tech-tools/2025/il-foglio-newspaper-generated-artificial-intelligence/ Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Martin, A., & Newell, B. (2024). Synthetic data, synthetic media, and surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 22(4), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v22i4.18334 Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Matich, P., Thomson, T. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2025). Old threats, new name? Generative AI and visual journalism. Journalism Practice, 19(10), 2402–2421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2025.2451677 Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Medianet. (2025). 2025 Australian media landscape report. https://engage.medianet.com.au/2025-media-landscape-report Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Meir, N. (2015, June 15). Automated earnings stories multiply. The Associated Press. https://www.ap.org/the-definitive-source/announcements/automated-earnings-stories-multiply/ Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Min, S. J., & Fink, K. (2021). Keeping up with the technologies: Distressed journalistic labor in the pursuit of “shiny” technologies. Journalism Studies, 22(14), 1987–2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1979425 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Møller, L. A., Cools, H., & Skovsgaard, M. (2025). One size fits some: How journalistic roles shape the adoption of generative AI. Journalism Practice, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2025.2484622 Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Montaña-Niño, S. (2024). Automated journalistic assemblages. A conceptual approach to the normative and ethical debates on AI implementation in newsrooms. Problemi Dell’informazione, 1, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1445/113227 Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Moran, C. (2023, April 6). ChatGPT is making up fake Guardian articles. Here’s how we’re responding. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/06/ai-chatgpt-guardian-technology-risks-fake-article Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Moran, R. E., & Shaikh, S. J. (2022). Robots in the news and newsrooms: Unpacking meta-journalistic discourse on the use of artificial intelligence in journalism. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1756–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2085129 Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Oliver, L. (2024, November 1). This chatbot helps tell the story of how women are affected by drug trafficking in Paraguay. Reuters Institute News. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/chatbot-helps-tell-story-how-women-are-affected-drug-trafficking-paraguay Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Paris Charter on AI and Journalism. (2023, November 10). https://rsf.org/sites/default/files/medias/file/2023/11/Paris%20Charter%20on%20AI%20and%20Journalism.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Partnership on AI. (2023, February 27). PAI’s responsible practices for synthetic media. ­https://partnershiponai.org/ Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Petković, B. (2014). Media integrity matters: Reclaiming public service values in media and journalism (1st ed). Peace Institute, Institute for Contemporary Social and Political Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Radcliffe, D. (2025). Journalism in the AI era (TRF Insights). Thomson Reuters Foundation. https://www.trust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/TRF-Insights-Journalism-in-the-AI-Era.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Riordan, K. (2014). Accuracy, independence, and impartiality: How legacy media and digital natives approach standards in the digital age. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/accuracy-independence-and-­impartiality-how-legacy-media-and-digital-natives-approach Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Roper, D., Henriksson, T., Hälbich, K., & Martin, O. (2023). Gauging generative AI’s impact on newsrooms. World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). https://wan-ifra.org/insight/gauging-generative-ais-impact-in-newsrooms/ Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Salas, A., Rivero-Calle, I., & Martinón-Torres, F. (2023). Chatting with ChatGPT to learn about safety of COVID-19 vaccines – A perspective. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2235200 Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Samosir, H. (2023, July 12). More countries across Asia are debuting digital artificial intelligence news readers. Could Australia follow suit? ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-13/artificial-intelligence-news-readers-becoming-common-in-asia/102591790 Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Schell, K. (2024). AI transparency in journalism: Labels for a hybrid era. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2025-01/RISJ%20Fellows%20Paper_Katja%20Schell_MT24_Final.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Simon, F. M. (2022). Uneasy bedfellows: AI in the news, platform companies and the issue of journalistic autonomy. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1832–1854. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2063150 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Simon, F. M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the news: How AI retools, rationalizes, and reshapes journalism and the public arena. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. https://journalism.columbia.edu/news/tow-report-artificial-intelligence-news-and-how-­ai-reshapes-journalism-and-public-arena Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Simon, F. M., Altay, S., & Mercier, H. (2023). Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-127 Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Simon, F. M., & Isaza-Ibarra, L. F. (2023). AI in the news: Reshaping the information ecosystem? Oxford Internet Institute. https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Minderoo_Report_Simon_Ibarra.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Sjøvaag, H. (2024). The business of news in the AI economy. AI Magazine, 45(2), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12172 Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Society of Professional Journalists. (2014). SPJ code of ethics. https://www.spj.org/spj-code-of-ethics/ Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Squicciarini, M., Valdez Genao, J., & Sarmiento, C. (2024). Synthetic content and AI policy: A primer. UNESCO. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/17958669/synthetic-content-and-its-implications-for-ai-policy/18857919/ Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Ternovski, J., Kalla, J., & Aronow, P. M. (2022). The negative consequences of informing voters about deepfakes: Evidence from two survey experiments. Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i2.28 Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Thomson, T. J., Thomas, R. J., & Matich, P. (2024). Generative visual AI in news organizations: Challenges, opportunities, perceptions, and policies. Digital Journalism, 1–22. ­https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2331769 Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Thomson, T. J., Thomas, R., Riedlinger, M., & Matich, P. (2025). Generative AI & journalism. RMIT University. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28068008 Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Toff, B., & Simon, F. M. (2024). “Or they could just not use it?”: The dilemma of AI disclosure for audience trust in news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(4), 881–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241308697 Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Tran, M. (2006, August 18). Robots write the news. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/blog/2006/aug/18/robotswriteth Google Scholar öffnen
  81. WashPostPR. (2024, November 7). The Washington Post launches “Ask the Post AI,” a new search experience. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/2024/11/07/washington-post-launches-ask-post-ai-new-search-experience/ Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Whittaker, L., Kietzmann, T. C., Kietzmann, J., & Dabirian, A. (2020). “All around me are synthetic faces”: The mad world of AI-generated media. IT Professional, 22(5), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2020.2985492 Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Wilding, D., Fray, P., Molitorisz, S., & McKewon, E. (2018). The impact of digital platforms on news and journalistic content. UTS Centre for Media Transition. http://hdl.handle.net/10453/159124 Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Wintterlin, F., Engelke, K. M., & Hase, V. (2020). Can transparency preserve journalism’s trustworthiness? Recipients’ views on transparency about source origin and verification regarding user-generated content in the news. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 9(2), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2020-2-218 Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Zier, J., & Diakopoulos, N. (2024, October 26). Labeling AI-generated news content: Matching journalist intentions with audience expectations. Proceedings of the Computation and Journalism Symposium 2024. https://cplusj2024.github.io/ Google Scholar öffnen

Zitation


Download RIS Download BibTex