Use Cases of the Integrated Administration and Control System’s Plot-Level Data: Protocol and Pilot Analysis for a Systematic Mapping Review

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: GJAE - German Journal of Agricultural Economics Jahrgang 72 (2023), Heft 03-04
Kein Zugriff

GJAE - German Journal of Agricultural Economics

Jahrgang 72 (2023), Heft 03-04

Autor:innen:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Verlag
dfv Mediengruppe, Frankfurt am Main
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
ISSN-Online
2191-4028
ISSN-Print
2191-4028

Kapitelinformationen

Kein Zugriff

Jahrgang 72 (2023), Heft 03-04

Use Cases of the Integrated Administration and Control System’s Plot-Level Data: Protocol and Pilot Analysis for a Systematic Mapping Review

Autor:innen:
, , , ,
ISSN-Print
2191-4028
ISSN-Online
2191-4028
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. APRIYANI, V., M.J.M. HOLLE, C. SILANGEN, F.T. OKTALIRA and S. MUMBUNAN. (2021): What evidence exists on the relationship between agricultural production and biodiversity in tropical rainforest areas? A systematic map protocol. In: Environmental Evidence 10 (1): 21. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. ARPINON, T. and R. ESPINOSA. (2022): A Practical Guide to Registered Reports for Economists. In: SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4110803. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. BARBOTTIN, A., C. BOUTY and P. MARTIN. (2018): Using the French LPIS database to highlight farm area dynamics: The case study of the Niort Plain. In: Land Use Policy 73 (Elsevier Ltd): 281-289. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. BILL, R., E. NASH and G. GRENZDÖRFFER. (2011): GIS in Agriculture. In: Springer Handbook of Geographic Information. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg: 461-476. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. BODDY, C.R. (2015): Sample size for Qualitative Interviews. In: Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 19 (2003): 426-432. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. BORNMANN, L., R. HAUNSCHILD and R. MUTZ (2021): Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. In: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 (1): 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. BRAINARD, J. (2023): Fake scientific papers are alarmingly common. https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common. doi:10.1126/science.adi6523. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. BROWN, S.E., D.C. MILLER, P.J. ORDONEZ and K. BAYLIS. (2018): Evidence for the impacts of agroforestry on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in high-income countries: A systematic map protocol. In: Environmental Evidence 7 (1): 24. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. BRUNSON, J.C. and Q. d. READ (2020): ggalluvial: Alluvial Plots in “ggplot2.” Google Scholar öffnen
  10. DALE, V.H. and S. POLASKY. (2007): Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. In: Ecological Economics 64 (2): 286-296. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. DIJK, S.H.B. VAN, M.G.J. BRUSSE-KEIZER, C.C. BUCSÁN, J. VAN DER PALEN, C.J.M. DOGGEN and A. LENFERINK (2023): Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used. In: BMJ open 13 (7): e072254. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. EDER, A., K. SALHOFER and E. SCHEICHEL. (2021): Land tenure, soil conservation, and farm performance: An eco-efficiency analysis of Austrian crop farms. In: Ecological Economics 180 (February 21): 106861. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2023): Aims of the integrated administration and control system. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/financing-cap/assurance-and-audit/managing-payments_en, accessed 13.10.2023. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. FAHRIG, L., J. BAUDRY, L. BROTONS, F.G. BUREL, T.O. CRIST, R.J. FULLER, C. SIRAMI, G.M. SIRIWARDENA and J.-L. MARTIN (2011): Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. In: Ecology Letters 14 (2): 101-112. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. FERRARO, P.J. and P. SHUKLA (2023): Credibility crisis in agricultural economics. In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 45 (3): 1275-1291. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. FINGER, R., C. GREBITUS and A. HENNINGSEN (2023): Replications in agricultural economics. In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 45 (3): 1258-1274. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. GRANT, M.J. and A. BOOTH (2009): A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. In: Health Information & Libraries Journal 26 (2): 91-108. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. HADDAWAY, N.R., B. MACURA, P. WHALEY and A.S. PULLIN (2018): ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. 7: 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. HAMMOND, A., A. ADRIAANSE, E. RODENBURG, D. BRYANT and R. WOODWARD (1995): Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World Resources Institute, Washington D. C. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. HECKELEI, T., S. HÜTTEL, M. ODENING and J. ROMMEL (2023): The p-Value Debate and Statistical (Mal)practice - Implications for the Agricultural and Food Economics Community. In: German Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (1): 47-67. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. HEINK, U. and I. KOWARIK (2010): What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning. In: Ecological Indicators 10 (3): 584-593. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. JAMES, K.L., N.P. RANDALL and N.R. HADDAWAY (2016): A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. In: Environmental Evidence 5 (1): 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. KELLY, E., L. LATRUFFE, Y. DESJEUX, M. RYAN, S. UTHES, A. DIAZABAKANA, E. DILLON and J. FINN (2018): Sustainability indicators for improved assessment of the effects of agricultural policy across the EU: Is FADN the answer? In: Ecological Indicators 89 (December 2017): 903-911. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. KIRCHWEGER, S., Y. CLOUGH, M. KAPFER, I. STEFFAN-DEWENTER and J. KANTELHARDT (2020): Do improved pollination services outweigh farm-economic disadvantages of working in small-structured agricultural landscapes? - Development and application of a bio-economic model. In: Ecological Economics 169: 106535. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. KUGLEY, S., A. WADE, J. THOMAS, Q. MAHOOD, A.K. JØRGENSEN, K. HAMMERSTRØM and N. SATHE (2017): Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. In: Campbell Systematic Reviews 13 (1): 1-73. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. KYERE, I., T. ASTOR, R. GRAß and M. WACHENDORF (2019): Multi-Temporal Agricultural Land-Cover Mapping Using Single-Year and Multi-Year Models Based on Landsat Imagery and IACS Data. In: Agronomy 9 (6): 309. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. LATRUFFE, L. and L. PIET (2014): Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France. In: Agricultural Systems 129 (July 2014): 68-80. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. LEONHARDT, H., M. PENKER and K. SALHOFER (2019): Do farmers care about rented land? A multi-method study on land tenure and soil conservation. In: Land Use Policy 82 (March 2019): 228-239. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. LOMBA, A., M. STROHBACH, J.S. JERRENTRUP, J. DAUBER, S. KLIMEK and D.I. MCCRACKEN (2017): Making the best of both worlds: Can high-resolution agricultural administrative data support the assessment of High Nature Value farmlands across Europe? In: Ecological Indicators 72 (Elsevier Ltd): 118-130. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. LÜKER-JANS, N., D. SIMMERING and A. OTTE (2016): Analysing Data of the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) to Detect Patterns of Agricultural Land-Use Change at Municipality Level. In: Landscape Online 48: 1-24. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. MAYRING, P. (2022): Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 13th ed. Beltz, Weinheim Basel. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. MEDEIROS, A., C. FERNANDES, J.F. GONÇALVES and P. FARINHA-MARQUES (2021): Research trends on integrative landscape assessment using indicators - A systematic review. In: Ecological Indicators 129: 107815. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. MUNN, Z., M.D.J. PETERS, C. STERN, C. TUFANARU, A. MCARTHUR and E. AROMATARIS (2018): Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. In: BMC Medical Research Methodology 18 (1): 143. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. NIEMEIJER, D. (2002): Developing indicators for environmental policy: Data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example. In: Environmental Science and Policy 5 (2): 91-103. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. NIEMEIJER, D. and R.S. DE GROOT (2008): A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. In: Ecological Indicators 8 (1): 14-25. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. NIEMI, G.J. and M.E. MCDONALD (2004): Application of ecological indicators. In: Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35 (1): 89-111. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. NIVA CONSORTIUM. NIVA TECHNICAL BRIEF No. 1: Common Crop Type List for CAP Monitoring Executive summary. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. OTTOY, S., V. ANGILERI, C. GIBERT, M.L. PARACCHINI, P. POINTEREAU, J.M. TERRES, J. VAN ORSHOVEN, L. VRANKEN and L. V. DICKS (2018): Impacts of selected Ecological Focus Area options in European farmed landscapes on climate regulation and pollination services: A systematic map protocol. In: Environmental Evidence 7 (1): 10. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. PETERS, M.D.J., C. MARNIE, A.C. TRICCO, D. POLLOCK, Z. MUNN, L. ALEXANDER, P. MCINERNEY, C.M. GODFREY and H. KHALIL (2020): Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. In: JBI Evidence Synthesis 18 (10): 2119-2126. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. R CORE TEAM (2021): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. ROSSUM, G. VAN and F.L. DRAKE (2009): Python 3 Reference Manual. Create Space, Scotts Valley, CA. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. RUSCH, A., K. BIRKHOFER, R. BOMMARCO, H.G. SMITH and B. EKBOM (2014): Management intensity at field and landscape levels affects the structure of generalist predator communities. In: Oecologia 175 (3): 971-983. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. RUSCH, A., R. BOMMARCO, M. JONSSON, H.G. SMITH and B. EKBOM (2013): Flow and stability of natural pest control services depend on complexity and crop rotation at the landscape scale. In: Journal of Applied Ecology 50 (2): 345-354. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. SABEL, B.A., E. KNAACK, G. GIGERENZER and M. BILC (2023): Fake Publications in Biomedical Science: Red-flagging Method Indicates Mass Production. In: medRxiv (2023.05.06.23289563). doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.06.23289563. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. SAGRIS, V., T. KIKAS and V. ANGILERI (2015): Registration of land for the common agricultural policy management: Potentials for evaluation of environmental policy integration. In: International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 11 (1): 24-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. SAGRIS, V., P. WOJDA, P. MILENOV and W. DEVOS (2013): The harmonised data model for assessing Land Parcel Identification Systems compliance with requirements of direct aid and agri-environmental schemes of the CAP. In: Journal of Environmental Management 118 (Elsevier Ltd): 40-48. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. SCIMAGO. SJR — SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Portal]: http://www.scimagojr.com. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. SKLENICKA, P., V. JANOVSKA, M. SALEK, J. VLASAK and K. MOLNAROVA (2014): The Farmland Rental Paradox: Extreme land ownership fragmentation as a new form of land degradation. In: Land Use Policy 38 (May 2014): 587-593. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. SKLENICKA, P. and M. SALEK (2008): Ownership and soil quality as sources of agricultural land fragmentation in highly fragmented ownership patterns. In: Landscape Ecology 23 (3): 299-311. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. TOMLINSON, S.J., U. DRAGOSITS, P.E. LEVY, A.M. THOMSON and J. MOXLEY (2018): Quantifying gross vs. net agricultural land use change in Great Britain using the Integrated Administration and Control System. In: Science of the Total Environment 628-629 (July 1, 2018): 1234-1248. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. UTHES, S., E. KELLY and H.J. KÖNIG (2020): Farm-level indicators for crop and landscape diversity derived from agricultural beneficiaries data. In: Ecological Indicators 108 (January 2020): 105725. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. UUEMAA, E., Ü. MANDER and R. MARJA (2013): Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. In: Ecological Indicators 28 (May 2013): 100-106. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. WICKHAM, H (2016): ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. WOLFF, S., S. HÜTTEL, C. NENDEL and T. LAKES (2021): Agricultural Landscapes in Brandenburg, Germany: An Analysis of Characteristics and Spatial Patterns. In: International Journal of Environmental Research 15 (3): 487-507. Google Scholar öffnen

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex
Kein Zugriff
Sie haben keinen Zugriff auf diesen Inhalt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien