“This is not what I expected”: The Meaning of Democracy as Freedom in Post-Apartheid South Africa

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover des Buchs: Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Open Access Vollzugriff

Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie

Festschrift für Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

Autor:innen:
Reihe
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Band
35
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

“This is not what I expected”: The Meaning of Democracy as Freedom in Post-Apartheid South Africa

Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  2. Alexander, Peter. 2013. ‘Marikana, Turning Point in South African History’. Review of African Political Economy 40(138): 605–19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  3. Anderson, Elizabeth. 2018. ‘Freedom and Equality’. In The Oxford Handbook of Freedom, eds. David Schmidtz and Carmen E. Pavel. New York: Oxford University Press, 90–105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  4. Arblaster, Anthony. 2002. Democracy. 3rd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  5. Arksey, Hilary, and Peter T. Knight. 1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists: An Introductory Resource with Examples. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  6. Beetham, David. 2004. ‘The Quality of Democracy: Freedom as the Foundation’. Journal of Democracy 15(4): 61–75. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  7. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1990. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  8. Berlin, Isaiah. 1966. Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  9. Blokker, Paul. 2010. Multiple Democracies in Europe: Political Culture in New Member States. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  10. Bratton, Michael, and Robert Mattes. 2001. ‘Support for Democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or Instrumental?’ British Journal of Political Science 31(3): 447–74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  11. Brooks, Heidi, Trevor Ngwane, and Carin Runciman. 2020. ‘Decolonising and Re-Theorising the Meaning of Democracy: A South African Perspective’. The Sociological Review 68(1): 17–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  12. Browne, Craig, and Paula Diehl. 2019. ‘Conceptualising the Political Imaginary: An Introduction to the Special Issue’. Social Epistemology 33(5): 393–97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  13. Bühlmann, Marc, Wolfgang Merkel, Lisa Müller, and Bernhard Weßels. 2012. ‘The Democracy Barometer: A New Instrument to Measure the Quality of Democracy and Its Potential for Comparative Research’. European Political Science 11(4): 519–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  14. Chuma, Wallace, Tanja Bosch, and Herman Wasserman. 2017. ‘The Media, Civil Society and Democracy in South Africa: State of the Nation Address 2015’. Communicatio 43(2): 93–108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  15. Collier, David, and Stephen Levitsky. 1997. ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’. World Politics 49(3): 430–51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  16. Dahl, Robert Alan. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  17. Diamond, Larry, and Leonardo Morlino. 2005. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  18. Diamond, Larry, and Marc F. Plattner. 2001. The Global Divergence of Democracies. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  19. Doorenspleet, Renske. 2015. ‘Where Are the People? A Call for People-Centred Concepts and Measurements of Democracy’. Government and Opposition 50(3): 469–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  20. Dovi, Suzanne. 2014. ‘Political Representation’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/political-representation/ (August 18, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  21. Duncan, Jane. 2016. Protest Nation: The Right to Protest in South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  22. Dunn, John. 1993. Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 BC to AD 1993. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  23. Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. ‘Do Liberty and Equality Conflict?’ In Living as Equals, ed. Paul Barker. New York: Oxford University Press, 39–57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  24. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2023. ‘Democracy | Definition, History, Meaning, Types, Examples, & Facts’. https://www.britannica.com/topic/democracy (June 19, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  25. Ezrahi, Yaron. 2012. Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  26. Gready, Paul. 2010. The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  27. Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  28. Hayek, Friedrich August. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Abingdon & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  29. Held, David. 2006. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  30. von Holdt, Karl. 2013. ‘South Africa: The Transition to Violent Democracy’. Review of African Political Economy 40(138): 589–604. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  31. Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  32. Isakhan, Benjamin, and Stephen Stockwell. 2012. Edinburgh Companion to the History of Democracy. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  33. Johnson-Cartee, Karen S. 2005. News Narratives and News Framing: Constructing Political Reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  34. Krastev, Ivan, and Stephen Holmes. 2019. The Light That Failed: A Reckoning. London: Penguin UK. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  35. Kruse, Stefan, Maria Ravlik, and Christian Welzel. 2019. ‘Democracy Confused: When People Mistake the Absence of Democracy for Its Presence’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 50(3): 315–35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  36. Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. 2016. ‘Social Construction’. In Oxford Bibliographies in Communication, ed. Patricia Moy. DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199756841-0106. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0106.xml (June 8, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  37. Lieberman, Evan. 2022. Until We Have Won Our Liberty: South Africa after Apartheid. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  38. Mandela, Nelson. 2013. Long Walk To Freedom. London: Little, Brown. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  39. Mkhize, Mbekezeli C. 2015. ‘Is South Africa’s 20 Years of Democracy in Crisis? Examining the Impact of Unrest Incidents in Local Protests in the Post-Apartheid South Africa’. African Security Review 24(2): 190–206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  40. Moosa, Mikhail, and Jan Hofmeyr. 2021. ‘South Africans’ Trust in Institutions and Representatives Reaches New Low’. Africa Portal. https://www.africaportal.org/publications/south-africans-trust-institutions-and-representatives-reaches-new-low/ (May 5, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  41. Munck, Gerardo L. 2016. ‘What Is Democracy? A Reconceptualization of the Quality of Democracy’. Democratization 23(1): 1–26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  42. Nussbaum, Martha, and Amartya Sen. 1993. The Quality of Life. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  43. Project, Borgen. 2020. ‘Poverty on the Rise in South Africa’. The Borgen Project. https://borgenproject.org/poverty-in-south-africa/ (April 14, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  44. Robeyns, Ingrid, and Morten Fibieger Byskov. 2023. ‘The Capability Approach’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, eds. Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/ (May 5, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  45. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2004. ‘The Quality of Democracy: Addressing Inequality’. Journal of Democracy 15(4): 76–90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  46. Saward, Michael. 2003. Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  47. Saward, Michael. 2006. ‘The Representative Claim’. Contemporary Political Theory 5(3): 297–318. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  48. Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2000. Democracy in Translation: Understanding Politics in an Unfamiliar Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  49. Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2014. ‘Thin Descriptions: The Limits of Survey Research on the Meaning of Democracy’. Polity 46(3): 303–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  50. Schedler, Andreas, and Rodolfo Sarsfield. 2007. ‘Democrats with Adjectives: Linking Direct and Indirect Measures of Democratic Support’. European Journal of Political Research 46(5): 637–59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  51. Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Henry E. Brady, and Sidney Verba. 2020. Unequal and Unrepresented: Political Inequality and the People’s Voice in the New Gilded Age. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  52. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and Christiane Grill. 2020. ‘From the Living Room to the Meeting Hall? Citizens’ Political Talk in the Deliberative System’. Political Communication 37(6): 832–51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  53. Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  54. Sen, Amartya. 1995. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  55. Shapiro, Ian, and Casiano Hacker-Cordón. 1999. Democracy’s Edges. London, UK & New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  56. Snyder, Jack L. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  57. Sorensen, Lone, Heather Ford, Walid Al-Saqaf, and Tanja Bosch. 2019. ‘Dialogue of the Deaf: Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address’. In ed. Katrin Voltmer et al. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 229–54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  58. South African Government. 2023. ‘The Constitution’. https://www.gov.za/constitution/ (August 11, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  59. Southall, Roger. 2016. The New Black Middle Class in South Africa. Suffolk (UK): James Currey. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  60. Steiner, Hillel. 2018. ‘On the Conflict between Liberty and Equality’. In The Oxford Handbook of Freedom, eds. David Schmidtz and Carmen E. Pavel. New York: Oxford University Press, 76–89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  61. Twala, Chitja. 2014. ‘The Causes and Socio-Political Impact of the Service Delivery Protests to the South African Citizenry: A Real Public Discourse’. Journal of Social Sciences 39(2): 159–67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  62. Voltmer, Katrin. 2019. ‘Democratization Conflicts as Communicative Contestations’. In Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change. Case Studies on Contested Transitions, ed. Katrin Voltmer et al. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  63. van Wessel, Margit. 2010. ‘Political Disaffection: What We Can Learn from Asking the People’. Parliamentary Affairs 63(3): 504–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  64. van Wessel, Margit. 2017. ‘Citizens as Sense-Makers: Towards a Deeper Appreciation of Citizens’ Understandings of Democratic Politics’. Political Studies 65(1): 127–45. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  65. Whitehead, Laurence. 2002. Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien