Rethink: Planetary Perspectives on Circularity

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Swiss Journal of Business Jahrgang 79 (2025), Heft 3
Open Access Vollzugriff

Swiss Journal of Business

Jahrgang 79 (2025), Heft 3

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2025
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
ISSN-Print
2944-3741

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 79 (2025), Heft 3

Rethink: Planetary Perspectives on Circularity

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2944-3741
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
Kapitelvorschau:

Kreislaufwirtschaft ist zu einer der wichtigsten Strategien für die Transformation unserer Gesellschaft aufgestiegen: Kreisläufe zu schliessen soll ökonomische Profite unabhängig vom Ressourcenverbrauch und dem damit einhergehenden Umweltauswirkungen ermöglichen. Das Denken in Kreisläufen und Systemen ist zweifelsohne essenziell, um eine Gesellschaft innerhalb planetarer Grenzen aufzubauen. Aber: Kreislaufstrategien müssen auf spezifische Probleme zugeschnitten sein. Kreislaufwirtschaft ist nicht ein Allheilmittel, daher ist es wichtig herauszukristallisieren, wann und wo Kreislaufwirtschaft zum planetaren Wohlergehen beitragen kann. Dabei stellt sich „Rethink“ – umdenken – als wichtigste Strategie heraus: von der Art und Weise wie wir Energie verwenden, über die Priorität wirtschaftlicher Aktivitäten, zur Rolle die die Kreislaufwirtschaft selbst in der Transformation spielt.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockstrom, J., & Lenton, T. M. (2022). Exceeding 1.5 degrees C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. In Science (Vol. 377, Issue 6611, p. eabn7950). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  2. Barnhart, C. J., & Benson, S. M. (2013). On the importance of reducing the energetic and material demands of electrical energy storage. In Energy and Environmental Science (Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp. 1083–1092). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  3. Bärnthaler, R., Novy, A., & Plank, L. (2021). The foundational economy as a cornerstone for a social–ecological transformation. In Sustainability (Vol. 13, Issue 18). www.doi.org/10.3390/su131810460 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  4. Baum, H.-G. (2018). Eco-efficiency—A measure to determine optimal recycling rates? In J. Fellner, D. Laner, & J. Lederer (Eds.), Science to support circular economy. Christian Doppler Laboratory “Anthropogenic Resources”, TU Wien Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management. https://iwr.tuwien.ac.at/circular-economy/home/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  5. Blomsma, F., & Brennan, G. (2017). The emergence of circular economy: A new framing around prolonging resource productivity. In Journal of Industrial Ecology (Vol. 21, Issue 3, pp. 603–614). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  6. Blum, N., Haupt, M., & Benning, C. (2020). Why «Circular» doesn’t always mean «Sustainable». In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 162). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  7. Bocken, N. M. P., Pauw, I. D., Bakker, C., Grinten, B. V. D., Bocken, N. M. P., Pauw, I. D., Bakker, C., & Grinten, B. V. D. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. In Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering (Vol. 1015, pp. 1–12). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  8. Bocken, N. M. P., Stahel, W., Dobrauz, G., Koumbarakis, A., Obst, M., & Matzdorf, P. (2021). Circularity as the new normal—Whitepaper [Report]. PwC, WWF. www.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25761.22885 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  9. Carrara, S., Bobba, S., Blagoeva, D., Alves Dias, P., Cavalli, A., Georgitzikis, K., Grohol, M., Itul, A., Kuzov, T., Latunussa, C., Lyons, L., Malano, G., Maury, T., Prior Arce, A., Somers, J., Telsnig, T., Veeh, C., Wittmer, D., Black, C., … Christou, M. (2023). Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sectors in the EU - A foresight study [Report]. Publications Office of the European Union. www.doi.org/10.2760/386650 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  10. Chen, C., Chaudhary, A., & Mathys, A. (2019). Dietary change scenarios and implications for environmental, nutrition, human health and economic dimensions of food sustainability. In Nutrients (Vol. 11, Issue 4). www.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040856 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  11. Circle economy. (2023). Circularity gap report [Report]. Circle Economy. www.circularity-gap.world Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  12. Creutzig, F., Kopp, M., Berrill, P., Desing, H., Javaid, A., Mastrucci, A., Milojevic-Dupond, N., Nachtigall, F., Napiontel, J., Schlesier, H., Silva, M., Wiedenhofer, D., & Zharova, A. (submitted). Towards an integrated understanding of urban design, sustainability and circularity. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  13. Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W. F., Azevedo, I. M. L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dalkmann, H., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Geels, F. W., Grubler, A., Hepburn, C., Hertwich, E. G., Khosla, R., Mattauch, L., Minx, J. C., Ramakrishnan, A., Rao, N. D., Steinberger, J. K., Tavoni, M., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., & Weber, E. U. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. In Nature Climate Change (Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 260–263). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  14. Creutzig, F., Simoes, S. G., Leipold, S., Berrill, P., Azevedo, I., Edelenbosch, O., Fishman, T., Haberl, H., Hertwich, E., Krey, V., Lima, A. T., Makov, T., Mastrucci, A., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Nachtigall, F., Pauliuk, S., Silva, M., Verdolini, E., van Vuuren, D., … Wilson, C. (2024). Demand-side strategies key for mitigating material impacts of energy transitions. In Nature Climate Change (Vol. 14, Issue 6, pp. 561–572). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  15. Desing, H. (2022). Below zero. In Environmental Science: Advances (pp. 612–619). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  16. Desing, H. (2024). E-retrofitting busses for a faster mobility turnaround and preservation of resources. https://circeular.org/e-retrofitting-busses-for-a-faster-mobility-turnaround-and-preservation-of-resources/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  17. Desing, H., & Blum, N. (2023). On circularity, complexity and (elements of) hope. In Circular Economy (Vol. 1, Issue 1). www.doi.org/10.55845/WNHN7338 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  18. Desing, H., Braun, G., & Hischier, R. (2020). Ecological resource availability: A method to estimate resource budgets for a sustainable economy. In Global Sustainability (Vol. 3, pp. 1–11). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  19. Desing, H., Brunner, D., Takacs, F., Nahrath, S., Frankenberger, K., & Hischier, R. (2020). A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 155). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104673 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  20. Desing, H., Gerber, A., Hischier, R., Wäger, P., & Widmer, R. (2022). The 3‐machines energy transition model: Exploring the energy frontiers for restoring a habitable climate. In Earth’s Future (Vol. 10, Issue 10, pp. 1–15). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  21. Desing, H., Schlesier, H., & Gauch, M. (2025). Solar Basic Service—Just acceleration of the energy transition. In Progress in Energy. www.doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/adc370 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  22. Desing, H., & Widmer, R. (2021). Reducing climate risks with fast and complete energy transitions: Applying the precautionary principle to the Paris agreement. In Environmental Research Letters (Vol. 16, Issue 12, p. 121002). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  23. Desing, H., & Widmer, R. (2022). How much energy storage can we afford? On the need for a sunflower society, aligning demand with renewable supply. In Biophysical Economics and Sustainability (Vol. 7, Issue 3, p. 3). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  24. Desing, H., Widmer, R., Bardi, U., Beylot, A., Billy, R. G., Gasser, M., Gauch, M., Monfort, D., Müller, D. B., Raugei, M., Remmen, K., Schenker, V., Schlesier, H., Valdivia, S., & Wäger, P. (2024). Mobilizing materials to enable a fast energy transition: A conceptual framework. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 200). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107314 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  25. Desing, H., Widmer, R., Beloin-Saint-Pierre, D., Hischier, R., & Wäger, P. (2019). Powering a sustainable and circular economy—An engineering approach to estimating renewable energy potentials within earth system boundaries. In Energies (Vol. 12, Issue 24, pp. 1–18). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  26. Ditlevsen, P., & Ditlevsen, S. (2023). Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. In Nature communications (Vol. 14, Issue 1, p. 4254). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  27. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Completing the picture—How the circular economy tackles climate change [Report]. EMF. www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  28. European Commission. (2020). A new circular economy action plan—For a cleaner and more competitive europe [Report]. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_de Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  29. European Environmental Bureau. (2019). Decoupling Debunked—Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability [Report]. EEB. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  30. European Environmental Bureau. (2021). Sufficiency and Circularity—The two overlooked decarbonisation strategies in the fit for 55 package [Report]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  31. Fuss, S., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., Luderer, G., Nemet, G. F., Rogelj, J., Smith, P., Vicente, J. L. V., Wilcox, J., del Mar Zamora Dominguez, M., & Minx, J. C. (2018). Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. In Environmental Research Letters (Vol. 13, Issue 6). www.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  32. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 143, pp. 757–768). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  33. Gerten, D., Heck, V., Jägermeyr, J., Bodirsky, B. L., Fetzer, I., Jalava, M., Kummu, M., Lucht, W., Rockström, J., Schaphoff, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2020). Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries. In Nature Sustainability. www.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0465-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  34. Gerwin, M. (2022). Deliberative democracy: Waldenia-model [Report]. bluedemocracy.pl Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  35. Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2021). The dawn of everything—A new history of humanity. Allen Lane. https://dawnofeverything.industries Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  36. Griscom, B. W., Adams, J., Ellis, P. W., Houghton, R. A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D. A., Schlesinger, W. H., Shoch, D., Siikamaki, J. V., Smith, P., Woodbury, P., Zganjar, C., Blackman, A., Campari, J., Conant, R. T., Delgado, C., Elias, P., Gopalakrishna, T., Hamsik, M. R., … Fargione, J. (2017). Natural climate solutions. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 114, Issue 44, pp. 11645–11650). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  37. Grübel, B., Cimiotti, G., Schmiga, C., Schellinger, S., Steinhauser, B., Brand, A. A., Kamp, M., Sieber, M., Brunner, D., Fox, S., & Kluska, S. (2021). Progress of plated metallization for industrial bifacial TOPCon silicon solar cells. In Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications (Vol. 30, Issue 6, pp. 615–621). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  38. Hallam, B., Kim, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Lennon, A., Verlinden, P., Altermatt, P. P., & Dias, P. R. (2022). The silver learning curve for photovoltaics and projected silver demand for net‐zero emissions by 2050. In Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications (Vol. 31, Issue 6, pp. 598–606). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  39. Haupt, M., Waser, E., Wurmli, J. C., & Hellweg, S. (2018). Is there an environmentally optimal separate collection rate? In Waste management (New York, N.Y.) (Vol. 77, pp. 220–224). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  40. Heath, G. A., Silverman, T. J., Kempe, M., Deceglie, M., Ravikumar, D., Remo, T., Cui, H., Sinha, P., Libby, C., Shaw, S., Komoto, K., Wambach, K., Butler, E., Barnes, T., & Wade, A. (2020). Research and development priorities for silicon photovoltaic module recycling to support a circular economy. In Nature Energy (Vol. 5, Issue 7, pp. 502–510). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  41. Heide, M., Hauschild, M. Z., & Ryberg, M. (2023). Reflecting the importance of human needs fulfilment in absolute sustainability assessments: Development of a sharing principle. In Journal of Industrial Ecology (Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 1151–1164). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  42. Hummen, T., & Desing, H. (2021). When to replace products with which (circular) strategy? An optimization approach and lifespan indicator. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 174). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105704 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  43. IEA. (2023). Critical minerals market review 2023 [Report]. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/critical-minerals-market-review-2023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  44. IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services [Report]. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  45. IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022—Impacts, adaption and vulerability [Report]. IPCC. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  46. Ivanova, M., Rogalla, M., & Desing, H. (2024). Zukunfts(K)reise—How we can create planet-compatible circularity. Empa, PHSG. https://www.empa.ch/web/zukunftskreise/the-book Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  47. Kikstra, J. S., Daioglou, V., Min, J., Sferra, F., Soergel, B., Kriegler, E., Lee, H., Mastrucci, A., Pachauri, S., Rao, N., Rauner, S., van Vuuren, D., Riahi, K., van Ruijven, B., & Rogelj, J. (2025). Closing decent living gaps in energy and emissions scenarios: Introducing DESIRE. Environmental Research Letters, 20(5), 054038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adc3ad Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  48. Kikstra, J. S., Mastrucci, A., Min, J., Riahi, K., & Rao, N. D. (2021). Decent living gaps and energy needs around the world. In Environmental Research Letters (Vol. 16, Issue 9). www.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1c27 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  49. Lebre, E., Stringer, M., Svobodova, K., Owen, J. R., Kemp, D., Cote, C., Arratia-Solar, A., & Valenta, R. K. (2020). The social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metals. In Nature communications (Vol. 11, Issue 1, p. 4823). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  50. Lennon, A., Lunardi, M., Hallam, B., & Dias, P. R. (2022). The aluminium demand risk of terawatt photovoltaics for net zero emissions by 2050. In Nature Sustainability (Vol. 5, Issue 4, pp. 357–363). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  51. Lenton, T. M., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Loriani, S., Abrams, J. F., Lade, S. J., Donges, J. F., Milkoreit, M., Powell, T., Smith, S. R., Zimm, C., Buxton, J. E., Bailey, E., Laybourn, L., Ghadiali, A., & Dyke, J. G. (2023). The global tipping points report 2023 [Report]. University of Exeter. www.global-tipping-points.org Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  52. Lura, P., Lunati, I., Desing, H., Heuberger, M., Bach, C., & Richner, P. (2025). Mining the atmosphere: A concrete solution to global warming. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 212). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107968 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  53. Millward-Hopkins, J. (2022). Inequality can double the energy required to secure universal decent living. In Nature communications (Vol. 13, Issue 1, p. 5028). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  54. Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D., & Oswald, Y. (2020). Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario. In Global Environmental Change (Vol. 65, p. 102168). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  55. O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. In Nature Sustainability (Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 88–95). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  56. Pauliuk, S. (2024). Decent living standards, prosperity, and excessive consumption in the Lorenz curve. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 220). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108161 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  57. Persson, L., Carney Almroth, B. M., Collins, C. D., Cornell, S., de Wit, C. A., Diamond, M. L., Fantke, P., Hassellov, M., MacLeod, M., Ryberg, M. W., Sogaard Jorgensen, P., Villarrubia-Gomez, P., Wang, Z., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2022). Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. In Environmental science & technology (Vol. 56, Issue 3, pp. 1510–1521). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  58. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain (Policy Report No. 2544). PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  59. Rao, N. D., & Min, J. (2018). Decent living standards: Material prerequisites for human wellbeing. In Social indicators research (Vol. 138, Issue 1, pp. 225–244). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  60. Raworth, K. (2013). Defining a safe and just space for humanity. In State of the world 2013: Is sustainability still possible? www.doi.org/DOI 10.5822/ 978-1-61091-458-1_3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  61. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Druke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., von Bloh, W., Feulner, G., Fiedler, S., Gerten, D., Gleeson, T., Hofmann, M., Huiskamp, W., Kummu, M., Mohan, C., Nogues-Bravo, D., … Rockstrom, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. In Science advances (Vol. 9, Issue 37, p. eadh2458). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  62. Rockström, J., Gupta, J., Qin, D., Lade, S. J., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Bai, X., Bala, G., Bunn, S. E., Ciobanu, D., DeClerck, F., Ebi, K., Gifford, L., Gordon, C., Hasan, S., Kanie, N., Lenton, T. M., Loriani, S., … Zhang, X. (2023). Safe and just Earth system boundaries. In Nature. www.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  63. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schnellhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., … Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. In Ecology and Society (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 1–33). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  64. Schlesier, H., Guillen-Gosalbez, G., & Desing, H. (in review). Digesting fossil infrastructure for cleaner energy transitions. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6346491/v1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  65. Schlesier, H., Schäfer, M., & Desing, H. (2024). Measuring the Doughnut: A good life for all is possible within planetary boundaries. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 448). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141447 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  66. Schmalz, D. (2025). Das bevölkerungsargument (1st ed.). Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  67. Shepon, A., Eshel, G., Noor, E., & Milo, R. (2018). The opportunity cost of animal based diets exceeds all food losses. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 115, Issue 15, pp. 3804–3809). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  68. Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., de Vries, W., Vermeulen, S. J., Herrero, M., Carlson, K. M., Jonell, M., Troell, M., DeClerck, F., Gordon, L. J., Zurayk, R., Scarborough, P., Rayner, M., Loken, B., Fanzo, J., … Willett, W. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. In Nature (Vol. 562, Issue 7728, pp. 519–525). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  69. Springmann, M., Dingenen, R. V., Vandyck, T., Latka, C., Witzke, P., & Leip, A. (2023). The global and regional air quality impacts of dietary change. Nature Communications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41789-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  70. Sverdrup, H., Koca, D., & Ragnarsdottir, K. V. (2014). Investigating the sustainability of the global silver supply, reserves, stocks in society and market price using different approaches. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 83, pp. 121–140). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  71. The Silver Institute and Metal Focus. (2023). World silver survey 2023 [Report]. The Silver Institute. www.silverinstitute.org Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  72. Tost, M., Murguia, D., Hitch, M., Lutter, S., Luckeneder, S., Feiel, S., & Moser, P. (2020). Ecosystem services costs of metal mining and pressures on biomes. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.11.013 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  73. UN. (2022). World population prospects 2022 [Report]. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. https://population.un.org/wpp/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  74. UNEP. (2024). Global resources outlook 2024: Bend the trend – pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spikes [Report]. International Resource Panel. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/44901 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  75. United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. In Development and Cooperation (Vol. 42, p. 4). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  76. United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). Emission gap report 2022: The closing window—Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies [Report]. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  77. van Westen, R. M., Kliphuis, M., & Dijkstra, H. A. (2024). Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course. In Science advances (Vol. 10, Issue 6, p. eadk1189). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  78. Victoria, M., Haegel, N., Peters, I. M., Sinton, R., Jäger-Waldau, A., del Cañizo, C., Breyer, C., Stocks, M., Blakers, A., Kaizuka, I., Komoto, K., & Smets, A. (2021). Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future. In Joule (Vol. 5, Issue 5, pp. 1041–1056). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  79. Vita, G., Hertwich, E. G., Stadler, K., & Wood, R. (2019). Connecting global emissions to fundamental human needs and their satisfaction. In Environmental Research Letters (Vol. 14, Issue 1). www.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae6e0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  80. Vita, G., Lundström, J. R., Hertwich, E. G., Quist, J., Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., & Wood, R. (2019). The environmental impact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in europe: Connecting local sustainability visions to global consequences. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 164). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  81. Waldinger, R., & Schulz, M. (2023). The good life and how to live it. Vermilion. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  82. Wang, P., Li, W., & Kara, S. (2018). Dynamic life cycle quantification of metallic elements and their circularity, efficiency, and leakages. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 174, pp. 1492–1502). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  83. Wiedenhofer, D., Wieland, H., Leipold, S., Aoki-Suzuki, C., Watari, T., Aguilar-Hernandez, G. A., Graf, S., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Zanon-Zotin, M., Kaufmann, L., Fortes, P., Haas, W. & Streeck, J. (2025). The Circular Economy and Climate Change: The State of National and Global Evidence on Mitigation Potential. Annual Review of Environment and Resources (Vol. 50). doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-111523-102441 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  84. Wiedmann, N., & Desing, H. (2024). Repurposing natural gas pipelines: A path to decarbonizing the eu’s heating sector? https://circeular.org/repurposing-natural-gas-pipelines-a-path-to-decarbonizing-the-eus-heating-sector/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  85. Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., Jonell, M., Clark, M., Gordon, L. J., Fanzo, J., Hawkes, C., Zurayk, R., Rivera, J. A., De Vries, W., Majele Sibanda, L., … Murray, C. J. L. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. In The Lancet (Vol. 393, Issue 10170, pp. 447–492). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  86. Wunderling, N., Winkelmann, R., Rockström, J., Loriani, S., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Ritchie, P. D. L., Sakschewski, B., & Donges, J. F. (2022). Global warming overshoots increase risks of climate tipping cascades in a network model. In Nature Climate Change (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 75–82). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01545-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  87. Zhang, Y., Kim, M., Wang, L., Verlinden, P., & Hallam, B. (2021). Design considerations for multi-terawatt scale manufacturing of existing and future photovoltaic technologies: Challenges and opportunities related to silver, indium and bismuth consumption. In Energy and Environmental Science (Vol. 14, Issue 11, pp. 5587–5610). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien