Media representations of sexuality in an era of pornification

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Jahrgang 13 (2024), Heft 4
Open Access Vollzugriff

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Jahrgang 13 (2024), Heft 4

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2025
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 13 (2024), Heft 4

Media representations of sexuality in an era of pornification

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
Kapitelvorschau:

Sexuell explizite Medieninhalte werden im Zuge der Digitalisierung heute in deutlich größerer Menge und Vielfalt in privaten, öffentlichen und kommerziellen Kontexten produziert und verbreitet. Die zunehmende Normalisierung von Pornografie, die stärkere Sexualisierung von Medieninhalten und die diesbezüglichen öffentlichen Debatten lassen sich als Trend zur Pornografisierung beschreiben. Zeitgleich entwickelt sich in den letzten Dekaden eine interdisziplinäre Pornografieforschung, zu der auch die Kommunikationswissenschaft wichtige Beiträge leistet. Doch institutionalisiert ist die Pornografieforschung im Unterschied zur Gaming-Forschung innerhalb der Kommunikationswissenschaft in deutlich geringerem Maße. Es gibt innerhalb der International Communication Association (ICA) eine Division “Game Studies”, aber keine Division “Porn Studies”. Und das vorliegende Schwerpunktheft ist unseres Wissens das erste Special Issue einer ICA-assoziierten Fachzeitschrift, das sich der Pornografie widmet. Die fünf empirischen Beiträge dieses Heftes befassen sich mit verschiedenen Aspekten der Pornografisierung: Es geht um die Presseberichterstattung über OnlyFans.com, um die nicht-kommerzielle Produktion und Verbreitung von pornografischen Darstellungen unter schwulen, bisexuellen und queeren Männern, um unterschiedliche Präferenzen bei pornografischen Inhalten, die allein oder in der Partnerschaft rezipiert werden, um computergenerierte Rough-Sex-Pornografie und um eine Intervention zur Förderung der Pornografiekompetenz. Das Schwerpunktheft möchte die Kommunikationswissenschaft dazu anregen, sich der sexuell expliziten Kommunikation stärker zu widmen und daran mitzuwirken, bestehende Forschungslücken zu schließen.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Ashton, S., McDonald, K., & Kirkman, M. (2018). Women’s experiences of pornography: A systematic review of research using qualitative methods. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(3), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1364337 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  2. Ashton, S., McDonald, K., & Kirkman, M. (2019). What does ‘pornography’ mean in the digital age? Revisiting a definition for social science researchers. Porn Studies, 6(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2018.1544096 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  3. Austin, E. W., & Domgaard, S. (2024). The media literacy theory of change and the message interpretation process model. Communication Theory, qtae018. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae018 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  4. Bennett-Brown, M., & Wright, P. J. (2022). Pornography consumption and partnered sex: A review of pornography use and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Current Addiction Reports, 9(3), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-022-00412-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  5. Bőthe, B., Vaillancourt-Morel, M. P., Bergeron, S., & Demetrovics, Z. (2019). Problematic and non-problematic pornography use among LGBTQ adolescents: A systematic literature review. Current Addiction Reports, 6(4), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00289-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  6. Brand, M., Antons, S., Wegmann, E., & Potenza, M. N. (2019). Theoretical assumptions on pornography problems due to moral incongruence and mechanisms of addictive or compulsive use of pornography: Are the two “conditions” as theoretically distinct as suggested? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1293-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  7. Byron, P., Newton, J. D. A., Hanson, O., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Saliba, B., & Demant, D. (2024). Social media, self-pornography, and gay/bisexual/queer men’s psychosexual wellbeing. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 13(4), 438–464. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  8. Chib, A., Nguyen, H., & Lin, D. (2021). Provocation as agentic practice: Gender performativity in online strategies of transgender sex workers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(2), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  9. Csányi, G., Dés, F., & Gregor, A. (2024). Pornification as Westernization on the semi-periphery: The history of the Hungarian ‘porn boom’ in the 1990s. Sexualities, 27(1–2), 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607221092651 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  10. Custers, K., & van den Bulck, J. (2012). The relationship between news exposure to a serial killer case and altruistic fear: An exploratory study. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 1(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2012-2-167 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  11. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  12. Döring, N., Krämer, N., Mikhailova, V., Brand, M., Krüger, T. H. C., & Vowe, G. (2021). Sexual interaction in digital contexts and its implications for sexual health: A conceptual analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769732 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  13. Döring, N., & Miller, D. J. (2022). Conceptual overview (Portrayals of sexuality in pornography). DOCA – Database of Variables for Content Analysis, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.34778/5k Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  14. Döring, N., & Mohseni, M. R. (2018). Are online sexual activities and sexting good for adults’ sexual well-being? Results from a national online survey. International Journal of Sexual Health, 30(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2018.1491921 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  15. Döring, N., & Mohseni, M. R. (2020). Gendered hate speech in YouTube and YouNow comments: Results of two content analyses. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 9(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2020-1-62 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  16. Döring, N., Vowels, L., Vowels, M., & Marcantonio, T. (in press). The impact of artificial intelligence on human sexuality: A five-year literature review 2020–2024. Current Sexual Health Reports. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  17. Döring, N., & Walter, R. (2021). Ikonografien des sexuellen Kindesmissbrauchs: Symbolbilder in Presseartikeln und Präventionsmaterialien [Iconographies of child sexual abuse: Symbolic images in press articles and prevention materials]. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 10(3), 362–405. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2021-3-362 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  18. Döring, N., & Walter, R. (2024). Qualität der Berichterstattung über sexuellen Kindesmissbrauch an der Odenwaldschule: Ein empirischer Vergleich zwischen Qualitäts- und Boulevardpresse [Quality of reporting on child sexual abuse at the Odenwaldschule in Germany: An empirical comparison between quality and tabloid press]. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 13(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2024-1-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  19. Eaton, A. A., & McGlynn, C. (2020). The psychology of nonconsensual porn: Understanding and addressing a growing form of sexual violence. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220941534 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  20. Ferguson, C. J., & Hartley, R. D. (2022). Pornography and sexual aggression: Can meta-analysis find a link? Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(1), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020942754 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  21. Fitzgerald, Q. (2024). OnlyFans statistics: Users, demographics & creator earnings in 2024. https://quantummarketer.com/onlyfans-statistics/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  22. Fritz, N., & Paul, B. (2017). From orgasms to spanking: A content analysis of the agentic and objectifying sexual scripts in feminist, for women, and mainstream pornography. Sex Roles, 77(9), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0759-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  23. Godulla, A., Hoffmann, C. P., & Seibert, D. (2021). Dealing with deepfakes – an interdisciplinary examination of the state of research and implications for communication studies. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 10(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2021-1-72 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  24. Grubbs, J. B., Wright, P. J., Braden, A. L., Wilt, J. A., & Kraus, S. W. (2019). Internet pornography use and sexual motivation: a systematic review and integration. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 117–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1584045 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  25. Hakkim, S., Parsa, A. D., Arafat, S. M. Y., Mahmud, I., Sathian, B., Sivasubramanian, M., & Kabir, R. (2022). Pornography – Is it good for sexual health? A systematic review. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 4(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/26318318221088949 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  26. Hald, G. M., & Malamuth, N. M. (2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(4), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9212-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  27. Hoagland, K. C., & Grubbs, J. B. (2021). Pornography use and holistic sexual functioning: A systematic review of recent research. Current Addiction Reports, 8(3), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-021-00378-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  28. Kohut, T., Fernandez, K., Fisher, W. A., & Campbell, L. (2024). What types of pornographic content are people using? A mixed-method analysis that highlights differences by gender and relationship context of use. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 13(4). 465–504. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  29. Koletić, G., Štulhofer, A., Hald, G. M., & Træen, B. (2021). Self-assessed effects of pornography use on personal sex life: Results from a large-scale study of Norwegian adults. International Journal of Sexual Health, 33(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.1918310 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  30. Koós, M., Nagy, L., Kraus, S. W., Demetrovics, Z., Potenza, M. N., Gaudet, É., Ballester-Arnal, R., Batthyány, D., Bergeron, S., Billieux, J., Briken, P., Burkauskas, J., Cárdenas-López, G., Carvalho, J., Castro-Calvo, J., Chang, Y. H., Chen, L., Ciocca, G., Corazza, O., . . . Bőthe, B. (2024). Why do people watch pornography? Cross-cultural validation of the pornography use motivations scale (PUMS) and its short form (PUMS-8). The Journal of Sex Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2359641 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  31. Lee, B., & Tamborini, R. (2005). Third-person effect and internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and internet self-efficacy. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02673.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  32. Litsou, K., Byron, P., McKee, A., & Ingham, R. (2021a). Learning from pornography: Results of a mixed methods systematic review. Sex Education, 21(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2020.1786362 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  33. Litsou, K., Graham, C., & Ingham, R. (2021b). Women in relationships and their pornography use: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(4), 381–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2021.1885532 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  34. Marshall, E. A., & Miller, H. A. (2019). Consistently inconsistent: A systematic review of the measurement of pornography use. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  35. Massey, K., Burns, J., & Franz, A. (2021). Young people, sexuality and the age of pornography. Sexuality & Culture, 25(1), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09771-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  36. McCormack, M., & Wignall, L. (2017). Enjoyment, exploration and education: Understanding the consumption of pornography among young men with non-exclusive sexual orientations. Sociology, 51(5), 975–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516629909 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  37. McKay, K., Poulin, C., & Muñoz-Laboy, M. (2021). Claiming public health crisis to regulate sexual outlets: A critique of the State of Utah’s declaration on pornography. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(2), 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01884-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  38. McKee, A. (2016). Pornography as a creative industry: challenging the exceptionalist approach to pornography. Porn Studies, 3(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2015.1065202 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  39. McKee, A., Byron, P., Litsou, K., & Ingham, R. (2020). An interdisciplinary definition of pornography: Results from a global Delphi panel. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01554-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  40. Mellor, E., & Duff, S. (2019). The use of pornography and the relationship between pornography exposure and sexual offending in males: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 46, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  41. Miller, D. J., & McBain, K. A. (2022). The content of contemporary, mainstream pornography: A literature review of content analytic studies. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 17(2), 219–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2021.2019648 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  42. Montgomery-Graham, S., Kohut, T., Fisher, W., & Campbell, L. (2015). How the popular media rushes to judgment about pornography and relationships while research lags behind. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 24(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.243-A4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  43. Mulholland, M. (2013). Young people and pornography. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326195 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  44. Nikunen, K., Paasonen, S., & Saarenmaa, L. (2007). Pornification: Sex and sexuality in media culture. Berg. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  45. Och, D. (2019). The mainstream cult of Fifty Shades of Grey: Hailing multiple women audiences. Communication, Culture & Critique, 12(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  46. Ort, A., & Fahr, A. (2020). The effectiveness of a positively vs. negatively valenced PSA against sexually transmitted diseases – Evidence from an experimental study. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 9(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  47. Paasonen, S. (2016). Pornification and the mainstreaming of sex. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.159 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  48. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). Adolescents and pornography: A review of 20 years of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  49. Sarracino, C., & Scott, K. M. (2009). The porning of America: The rise of porn culture, what it means, and where we go from here. Beacon Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  50. SimilarWeb. (2024). Top websites ranking. https://www.similarweb.com/top-websites/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  51. Smahel, D., MacHackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Olafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  52. Smith, C. (2010). Pornographication: A discourse for all seasons. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 6(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.6.1.103/3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  53. Sniewski, L., Farvid, P., & Carter, P. (2018). The assessment and treatment of adult heterosexual men with self-perceived problematic pornography use: A review. Addictive Behaviors, 77, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.10.010 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  54. Štulhofer, A., Wiessner, C., Koletić, G., Pietras, L., & Briken, P. (2022). Religiosity, perceived effects of pornography use on personal sex life, and moral incongruence: Insights from the German Health and Sexuality Survey (GeSiD). The Journal of Sex Research, 59(6), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1916422 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  55. Szczuka, J.M., & Szymczyk, N. (2024). Computer-generated rough sex: An empirical study about the interest in human and artificial sexually explicit media displaying rough and gentle sexual behaviors. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 13(4). 505–527. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  56. Thomas, M.F., & Buijzen, M. (in press). The influence of a porn literacy intervention on explicit and implicit attitudes. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 14(1). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  57. Tyler, M., & Quek, K. (2016). Conceptualizing pornographication: A lack of clarity and problems for feminist analysis. Sexualization, Media, & Society, 2(2), 2374623816643281. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374623816643281 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  58. Voss, G. (2012). ‘Treating it as a normal business’: Researching the pornography industry. Sexualities, 15(3–4), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712439650 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  59. Williams, L. (1999). Hard core: Power, pleasure, and the “frenzy of the visible” (2nd ed.). ACLS Humanities E-Book. University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  60. Wright, P. J. (2021). Overcontrol in pornography research: Let it go, let it go… Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(2), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01902-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  61. Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., & Kraus, A. (2016). A meta-analysis of pornography consumption and actual acts of sexual aggression in general population studies. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12201 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  62. Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R., Perry, S. L., & Rains, S. (2023). Pornography and religiosity: prediction and process. Human Communication Research, 49(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  63. Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., & Herbenick, D. (2024). Pornography, identification, alcohol, and condomless sex. Journal of Communication, 74(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae009 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  64. Wurm, A., & Wimmer, J. (2024). Zwischen feministischer Selbstermächtigung und Ausverkauf emotionaler Intimität: Eine qualitative Inhaltsanalyse der deutschen Berichterstattung über OnlyFans von 2020 bis 2023 [Between feminist self-empowerment and selling out emotional intimacy: A qualitative content analysis of German reporting on OnlyFans from 2020 till 2023]. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 13(4). 401–429. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  65. Zurbriggen, E. L., & Morgan, E. M. (2006). Who wants to marry a millionaire? Reality dating television programs, attitudes toward sex, and sexual behaviors. Sex Roles, 54(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8865-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  66.   Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-385
  67. Arriagada, A., & Ibáñez, F. (2020). “You need at least one picture daily, if not, you’re dead”: Content creators and platform evolution in the social media ecology. Social Media & Society, 6(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120944624 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  68. Bartels, A.-K. (2021). ‘Foreign infiltration’ vs ‘immigration country’: The asylum debate in Germany. In J. Silverstein & R. Stevens (Hrsg.), Refugee journeys: Histories of resettlement, representation and resistance (S. 89–108). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1h45md2.9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  69. Bødker, H. (2017). Vice media inc.: Youth, lifestyle and news. Journalism, 18(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916657522 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  70. Bonifacio, R., Hair, L., & Wohn, D. Y. (2021). Beyond fans: The relational labor and communication practices of creators on Patreon. New Media & Society, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027961 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  71. Bruns, A. (2010). Vom Prosumenten zum Produtzer [From prosumer to produser]. In B. Blättel-Mink & K. Hellmann (Hrsg.), Prosumer Revisited: Zur Aktualität einer Debatte (S. 191–205). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  72. Cardoso, D., Chronaki, D., & Scarcelli, C. M. (2022). Digital sex work? Creating and selling explicit content in OnlyFans. In T. Krijnen, P. G. Nixon, M. D. Ravenscroft, & C. M. Scarcelli (Hrsg.), Identities and intimacies on social media. Transnational perspectives (S.169–184). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  73. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  74. Consalvo, M., Lajeunesse, M., & Zanescu, A. (2020). The authenticity engine: Livestreaming on Twitch. Vortrag auf Proceedings of Digital Games Research Association 2020, Tampere Finland. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  75. Craig, D., & Cunningham, S. (2019). Social media entertainment: The new intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. New York University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  76. DeVito, M. A., Birnholtz, J., & Hancock, J. T. (2017). Platforms, people, and perception: Using affordances to understand self-presentation on social media. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, Portland, Oregon, USA. https://t1p.de/zsy8n Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  77. Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  78. Döring, N., Krämer, N., Mikhailova, V. Brand, M., Krüger, T.H.C., & Vowe, G. (2021). Sexual interaction in digital contexts and its implications for sexual health: A conceptual analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769732 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  79. Döring, N. (2014). Prostitution in Deutschland: Eckdaten und Veränderungen durch das Internet [Prostitution in Germany: Key data and changes due to the Internet]. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 27(2), 99–137. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1366591 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  80. Döring, N. (2011). Pornografie-Kompetenz: Definition und Förderung [Pornography-competence: Definition and promotion]. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 24(3), 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-128707 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  81. Drenten, J., Gurrieri, L., & Tyler, M. (2020). Sexualized labour in digital culture: Instagram influencers, porn chic and the monetization of attention. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12354 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  82. Eilders, C. (2016). Journalismus und Nachrichtenwert [Journalism and news value]. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 431–442). Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  83. Famemass (2021, 01. September). OnlyFans statistics: Users, creators, earnings & more. Famemass. https://famemass.com/onlyfans-statistics/ (Abgerufen am 03.03.2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  84. Fox, J., & McEwan, B. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84, 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  85. Gerassi, L. (2015). From exploitation to industry: Definitions, risks, and consequences of domestic sexual exploitation and sex work among women and girls. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 25(6), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2014.991055 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  86. Grenz, S. (2018). Sex-Arbeit. Ein feministisches Dilemma [Sex-work. A feminist dilemma]. Femina Politica–Zeitschrift für feministische Politikwissenschaft, 27(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.3224/feminapolitica.v27i1.09 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  87. Hamilton, V., Soneji, A., McDonald, A., & Redmiles, E. (2022). “Nudes? Shouldn’t I charge for these?”: Exploring what motivates content creation on OnlyFans. Human-Computer Interaction, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.10425 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  88. Hair, L. (2021). Friends, not ATMs: Parasocial relational work and the construction of intimacy by artists on Patreon. Sociological Spectrum, 41(2), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2021.1875090 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  89. Hepp, A. (2021). Auf dem Weg zur digitalen Gesellschaft. Über die tiefergreifende Mediatisierung der sozialen Welt [On the road to a digital society: On the profound mediatization of the social world]. Herbert von Halem Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  90. Höly, D. (2014). Nackte Tatsachen: Wie deutsche Printmedien über Prostitution berichten [Hard facts: How German print media reports on prostitution]. Tectum Wissenschaftsverlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  91. Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  92. Jackson, C. A. (2016). Framing sex worker rights: How US sex worker rights activists perceive and respond to mainstream anti-sex trafficking advocacy. Sociological Perspectives, 59(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416628553 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  93. Johnson, M. R. (2021). Behind the streams: The off-camera labour of game live streaming. Games and Culture, 16(8), 1001–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211005239 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  94. Kreissl, J., Possler, D., & Klimmt, C. (2021). Engagement with the gurus of gaming culture: Parasocial relationships to let’s players. Games and Culture, 1(8), 1021–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211005241 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  95. Kuckartz, U. (2016). Typenbildung und typenbildende Inhaltsanalyse in der empirischen Sozialforschung [Typification and typifying content analysis in the empirical social science]. In M. Schnell, C. Schulz, U. Kuckartz & C. Dunger (Hrsg.), Junge Menschen sprechen mit sterbenden Menschen. Palliative Care und Forschung (S. 31–51). Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  96. Kuckartz, U. (2010). Typenbildung [Typification]. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Hrsg.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (S. 553–568). Springer VS Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  97. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction – a review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(9), 3528–3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8093528 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  98. Kühne, K., & Sadowski, D. (2011). Scandalous co-determination. In A. Brink (Hrsg.), Corporate governance and business ethics (S. 75–87). Springer Netherlands. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  99. Leigh, C. (1998). Inventing sex work. In J. Nagle (Hrsg.), Whores and other feminists (S. 223–31). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  100. Liebers, N., & Schramm, H. (2019). Parasocial interactions and relationships with media characters – an inventory of 60 years of research. Communication Research Trends, 3(2), 4–31. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  101. Litam, S. D. A., Speciale, M. & Balkin, R. S. (2022). Sexual attitudes and characteristics of OnlyFans users. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 51, 3093–3103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02329-0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  102. Möhring, W., Tiele, A., Scherer, H., & Schneider, B. (2005). Repräsentative Stichprobe des Zeitungsangebots – die Methode der publizistischen Stichprobe als computerbasiertes Verfahren [Representative sample of the range of newspapers – The method of journalistic sampling as a computer-based procedure]. In V. Gehrau, B. Fretwurst, B. Krause & G. Daschmann (Hrsg.), Auswahlverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft, (S. 159–173). Herbert von Halem Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  103. Nitschke, P., & Schug, M. (2024, i.Dr.). Politische Online- Influencer:innen als neue Akteure in der öffentlichen Kommunikation [Political online-influencers as new actors in the public communication]. In C. Nuernbergk, J. Haßler, J. Schützeneder & N.F. Schumacher (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation und Demokratische Öffentlichkeit. Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  104. Pezzuto, S. (2019). From porn performer to porntropreneur: Online entrepreneurship, social media branding, and selfhood in contemporary trans pornography. About Gender: International Journal of Gender Studies, 8(16), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.15167/2279-5057/AG2019.8.16.1106 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  105. reporter (2020, 23. September). OnlyFans: Bonny wird reich mit sexy pics und fake Beziehungen [OnlyFans: Bonny becomes rich with sexy pics and fake relationships]. Reporter Magazin. https://www.zdf.de/funk/reporter-11853/funk-onlyfans-bonny-wird-reich-mit-sexy-pics-und-fake-beziehungen---reporter-100.html (Abgerufen am 03.08.2023). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  106. Sanchez, S. (2022). The worlds’ oldest profession gets a make-over: Sex-work, OnlyFans and celebrity participation. Women Leading Change: Case Studies on Women, Gender, and Feminism, 6(1), 1–27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  107. Sundar, S. (2007). Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (S. 89–104). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  108. Treem, J., & Leonardi, P. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. In C. T. Salmon (Hrsg.), Communication yearbook, Vol. 38, (S. 143–189). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  109. Uttarapong, J., Bonifacio, R., Jereza, R., & Wohn, D. Y. (2022). Social support in digital patronage: Onlyfans adult creators as an online community. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, New Orleans, LA, USA. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3491101.3519836 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  110. van der Nagel, E. (2021). Competing platform imaginaries of NSFW content creation on OnlyFans, Porn Studies, 8(4), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2021.1974927 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  111. Wohn, D. Y., Jough, P., Eskander, P., Siri, J. S., Shimobayashi, M., & Desai, P. (2019). Understanding digital patronage: Why do people subscribe to streamers on twitch? Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, Barcelona, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347160 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-401
  112. Ashford, C., & Longstaff, G. (2022). Toward a politics of “raw dicks”: Authenticity, the alt-self, and new understandings of the phallus. Journal of Bodies, Sexualities, and Masculinities, 3(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.3167/jbsm.2022.030107 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  113. Ashton, S., McDonald, K., & Kirkman, M. (2019). What does ‘pornography’ mean in the digi¬tal age? Revisiting a definition for social science researchers. Porn Studies, 6(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2018.1544096 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  114. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  115. Byron, P. (2019). ‘How could you write your name below that?’ The queer life and death of Tumblr. Porn Studies, 6(3), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2019.1613925 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  116. Byron, P., Robards, B., Hanckel, B., Vivienne, S., & Churchill, B. (2019). “Hey, I’m having these experiences”: Tumblr use and young people’s queer (dis)connections. International Journal of Communication, 13, 2239–2259. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9677 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  117. Campbell, J. E. (2004). Getting it on online: Cyberspace, gay male sexuality, and embodied identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783840 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  118. Cao, R. J. D. (2021). Gay amateur porn on twitter in the Philippines: Primitive aesthetics and affect. Synoptique, 9(2), 124–138. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2825442864/ abstract/72CF6995E1B74165PQ/1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  119. Corneau, S., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., Bernatchez, K., & Beauchemin, M. (2017). Gay male pornog¬raphy: A study of users’ perspectives. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(3), 223–245. https://doi.or g/10.1080/19419899.2017.1360931 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  120. Dean, T. (2014). Introduction: Pornography, technology, archive. In T. Dean, S. Ruszczycky, & D. Squires (Eds.), Porn Archives (pp. 1–26). Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  121. Demant, D., Hides, L., White, K. M., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2018). Effects of participation in and connectedness to the LGBT community on substance use involvement of sexual minority young people. Addictive Behaviors, 81, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.028 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  122. Demant, D., Byron, P., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Saliba, B., & Newton, J. D. A. (2024). The nexus between porn and psychosocial/psychosexual wellbeing among gay and bisexual men. Porn Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2024.2335975 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  123. Ding, R., & Song, L. (2023). Digital sexual publics: Understanding do-it-yourself gay porn and lived experiences of sexuality in China. International Journal of Communication, 17, 2463–2478. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19800 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  124. Downing, M. J., Schrimshaw, E. W., Scheinmann, R., Antebi-Gruszka, N., & Hirshfield, S. (2017). Sexually explicit media use by sexual identity: A comparative analysis of gay, bisexual, and heterosexual men in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1763–1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0837-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  125. En, B., En, M., & Griffiths, D. (2013). Gay stuff and guy stuff: The construction of sexual iden¬tities in sidebars on Reddit. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2013.61.293 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  126. Formby, E. (2022). LGBT ‘communities’ and the (self-)regulation and shaping of intimacy. So¬ciological Research Online, 27(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780420974031 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  127. Frost, D. M., & Meyer, I. H. (2012). Measuring community connectedness among diverse sexual minority populations. The Journal of Sex Research, 49(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1 080/00224499.2011.565427 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  128. Grov, C., Breslow, A. S., Newcomb, M. E., Rosenberger, J. G., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2014). Gay and bisexual men’s use of the internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.871626 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  129. Hakim, J. (2019). Work that body: male bodies in digital culture. Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  130. Hangen, F., & Rogge, R. D. (2022). Focusing the conceptualization of erotophilia and eroto¬phobia on global attitudes toward sex: development and validation of the sex positivity– negativity scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508- 021-02085-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  131. Kubicek, K., Beyer, W. J., Weiss, G., Iverson, E., & Kipke, M. D. (2010). In the dark: Young men’s stories of sexual initiation in the absence of relevant sexual health information. Health Education & Behavior, 37(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109339993 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  132. Kvalem, I. L., Træen, B., & Iantaffi, A. (2015). Internet pornography use, body ideals, and sexual self-esteem in Norwegian gay and bisexual men. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(4), 522–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1083782 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  133. Lammers, J., & Stoker, J. I. (2019). Power affects sexual assertiveness and sexual esteem equal¬ly in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10508-018-1285-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  134. Laurin, D. (2019). Subscription intimacy: Amateurism, authenticity and emotional labour in direct-to-consumer gay pornography. About Gender - International Journal of Gender Stud¬ies, 8(16), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.15167/2279-5057/AG2019.8.16.1114 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  135. Maddison, S. (2017). Comradeship of cock? Gay porn and the entrepreneurial voyeur. Porn Studies, 4(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2017.1304235 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  136. McKee, A., Byron, P., Litsou, K., & Ingham, R. (2020). An interdisciplinary definition of por¬nography: Results from a global delphi panel. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01554-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  137. Miles, S. (2018). Still getting it on online: Thirty years of queer male spaces brokered through digital technologies. Geography Compass, 12(11), e12407. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12407 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  138. Miller, B. (2022). Exploring the posting of nude photographs on Reddit in relation to self-esteem, perceived attractiveness, narcissism, and sensation seeking. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(6), 3083–3092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02301-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  139. Miller, D. J., Raggatt, P. T. F., & McBain, K. (2020). A literature review of studies into the prevalence and frequency of men’s pornography use. American Journal of Sexuality Educa¬tion, 15(4), 502–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2020.1831676 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  140. Mowlabocus, S. (2007). Gay men and the pornification of everyday life. In K. Nikunen, S. Paasonen, & L. Saarenmaa (Eds.), Pornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture (pp. 61–71). Berg. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  141. Paasonen, S., Jarrett, K., & Light, B. (2019). #NSFW: Sex, humor, and risk in social media. MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  142. Race, K. (2018). Towards a pragmatics of sexual media/networking devices. Sexualities, 21(8), 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718781538 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  143. Robards, B. (2018). ‘Totally straight’: Contested sexual identities on social media site reddit. Sexualities, 21(1–2), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716678563 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  144. Robards, B., Byron, P., & D’Souza, S. (2021). LGBTQ+ communities and digital media. In D. A. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  145. Roig-Mora, A., Ventura, R., Larrea, O., & Blanco-Fernández, V. (2024). (Homo)masculinities: Dating apps and body image among young gay users in Spain. Journal of LGBT Youth, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2024.2310652 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  146. Snell Jr, W. E., Fisher, T. D., & Schuh, T. (1992). Reliability and validity of the sexuality scale: A measure of sexual-esteem, sexual-depression, and sexual-preoccupation. The Journal of Sex Research, 29(2), 261–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499209551646 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  147. Stout, C. D., Paredes, C. D., & Nelson, K. M. (2023). “I wish I actually had known what the heck sex was:” What adolescent sexual minority males knew and wish they knew prior to sexual debut with a male partner. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 20, 84–93. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00682-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  148. Tiidenberg, K. (2014). Bringing sexy back: Reclaiming the body aesthetic via self-shooting. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/ CP2014-1-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  149. Tiidenberg, K., & van der Nagel, E. (2020). Sex and social media. Emerald Publishing Limited. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  150. Tziallas, E. (2015). Gamified eroticism: Gay male “social networking” applications and self-pornography. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9288-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  151. van der Nagel, E. (2021). Competing platform imaginaries of NSFW content creation on On¬lyFans. Porn Studies, 8(4), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2021.1974927 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  152. Veinot, T. C., Meadowbrooke, C. C., Loveluck, J., Hickok, A., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2013). How “community” matters for how people interact with information: Mixed methods study of young men who have sex with other men. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), e2370. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2370 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  153. Wang, S., & Ding, R. (2022). “Business inquiries are welcome”: Sex influencers and the plat-formization of non-normative media on Twitter. Television & New Media, 23(8), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221077666 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  154. Wang, Y. (2021). The twink next door, who also does porn: Networked intimacy in gay porn performers’ self-presentation on social media. Porn Studies, 8(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/23268743.2020.1841019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  155. Watson, B. M. (2021). A finding aid to the pornographic imaginary: Implications of amateur classifications on/by Reddit’s NSFW411. Porn Studies, 8(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.108 0/23268743.2020.1830590 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  156. Wignall, L. (2017). The sexual use of a social networking site: The case of pup Twitter. Socio¬logical Research Online, 22(3), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417724066 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  157. Yue, A. (2017). Trans-Singapore: Some notes towards queer Asia as method. Inter-Asia Cul¬tural Studies, 18(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2017.1273911 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  158.   Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-438
  159. Balzarini, R. N., Muise, A., Dobson, K., Kohut, T., Raposo, S., & Campbell, L. (2021). The detriments of unmet sexual ideals and buffering effect of sexual communal strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1521–1550. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000323 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  160. Bogaert, A. F. (2001). Personality, individual differences, and preferences for the sexual media. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026416723291 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  161. Bridges, A. J., Wosnitzer, R., Scharrer, E., Sun, C., & Liberman, R. (2010). Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: A content analysis update. Violence Against Women, 16(10), 1065–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210382866 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  162. Burger, R. H. (1987). The Meese report on pornography and its respondents: A review article. The Library Quarterly, 57(4), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/601939 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  163. Burke, K., & MillerMacPhee, A. (2021). Constructing pornography addiction’s harms in science, news media, and politics. Social Forces, 99(3), 1334–1362. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa035 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  164. Chadwick, S. B., Raisanen, J. C., Goldey, K. L., & van Anders, S. (2018). Strategizing to make pornography worthwhile: A qualitative exploration of women’s agentic engagement with sexual media. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 1853–1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1174-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  165. Campbell, L., & Kohut, T. (2017). The use and effects of pornography in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  166. Davis, A. C., Carrotte, E. R., Hellard, M. E., & Lim, M. S. (2018). What behaviors do young heterosexual Australians see in pornography? A cross-sectional study. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(3), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1417350 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  167. Droubay, B. A., Shafer, K., Miles, R. J., Butters, R. P., & Grubbs, J. B. (2024). Secrecy and deception: Values, shame, and endorsement of hiding one’s pornography viewing. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 39(1), 174–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2021.1976403 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  168. Fisher, W. A., & Barak, A. (1991). Pornography, erotica, and behavior: More questions than answers. International Journal of law and Psychiatry, 14(1–2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(91)90025-I Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  169. Galper, E. F., & Tindage, M. F. (2023). Let’s talk about sex (ual health): Young adult women’s disclosure of their pornography use to their romantic partners. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2257687 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  170. Hald, G. M., & Štulhofer, A. (2016a). Author’s correction letter. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 894. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1140487 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  171. Hald, G. M., & Štulhofer, A. (2016b). What types of pornography do people use and do they cluster? Assessing types and categories of pornography consumption in a large-scale online sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1065953 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  172. Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  173. Huntington, C., Pearlman, D. N., & Orchowski, L. (2022). The confluence model of sexual aggression: An application with adolescent males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1-2), 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2096844 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  174. IBM Corp. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 26.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  175. Klaassen, M. J., & Peter, J. (2015). Gender (in) equality in internet pornography: A content analysis of popular pornographic internet videos. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(7), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.976781 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  176. Kohut, T., Balzarini, R. N., Fisher, W. A., Grubbs, J. B., Campbell, L., & Prause, N. (2020). Surveying pornography use: A shaky science resting on poor measurement foundations. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(6), 722–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1695244 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  177. Kohut, T., Campbell, L., & Fisher, W. A. (2016). Measuring the use and/or non-use of adult media [Unpublished raw data]. Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Canada. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  178. Kohut, T., & Campbell, L. (2019). Premature speculation concerning pornography’s effects on relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 2255–2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1389-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  179. Kohut, T., Dobson, K. A., Balzarini, R. N., Rogge, R. D., Shaw, A. M., McNulty, J. K., ... & Campbell, L. (2021). But what’s your partner up to? Associations between relationship quality and pornography use depend on contextual patterns of use within the couple. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661347. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  180. Kohut, T., & Fisher, W. A. (2013). The impact of brief exposure to sexually explicit video clips on partnered female clitoral self-stimulation, orgasm and sexual satisfaction. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 22(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.935 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  181. Kohut, T. & Fisher, W. A. (2017). Personality, pornography, and sexuality [Unpublished raw data]. Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Canada. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  182. Kohut, T., & Fisher, W. A. (2024). Revisiting the role of pornography use in the confluence model theory of sexual aggression. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2174248 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  183. Kohut, T., Fisher, W. A., & Campbell, L. (2017). Patterns of pornography use of men and women in couple relationships. Manuscript in preparation, Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Canada. Retrieved from https://osf.io/p5rsz/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  184. Kohut, T., Fisher, W. A., & Campbell, L. (2018). Perceived effects of pornography on the couple relationship: Initial findings of open-ended, participant-informed,“bottom-up” research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0783-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  185. Leonhardt, N. D., Spencer, T. J., Butler, M. H., & Theobald, A. C. (2019). An organizational framework for sexual media’s influence on short-term versus long-term sexual quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 2233–2249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1209-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  186. Malamuth, N. M. (2018). “Adding fuel to the fire”? Does exposure to non-consenting adult or to child pornography increase risk of sexual aggression?. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.013 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  187. Malamuth, N. M., Lamade, R. V., Koss, M. P., Lopez, E., Seaman, C., & Prentky, R. (2021). Factors predictive of sexual violence: Testing the four pillars of the Confluence Model in a large diverse sample of college men. Aggressive Behavior, 47(4), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21960 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  188. McKee, A. (2015). Methodological issues in defining aggression for content analyses of sexually explicit material. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0253-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  189. Nelson, K. M., Simoni, J. M., Morrison, D. M., George, W. H., Leickly, E., Lengua, L. J., & Hawes, S. E. (2014). Sexually explicit online media and sexual risk among men who have sex with men in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0238-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  190. Paul, B. (2009). Predicting Internet pornography use and arousal: The role of individual difference variables. The Journal of Sex Research, 46(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902754152 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  191. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). Adolescents and pornography: A review of 20 years of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  192. Seida, K., & Shor, E. (2021). Aggression and pleasure in opposite-sex and same-sex mainstream online pornography: A comparative content analysis of dyadic scenes. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(3), 292–304. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  193. Shor, E. (2019). Age, aggression, and pleasure in popular online pornographic videos. Violence Against Women, 25(8), 1018–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012188041 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  194. Shor, E. (2022). Who seeks aggression in pornography? Findings from interviews with viewers. Archives of sexual behavior, 51(2), 1237–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02053-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  195. Shor, E., & Seida, K. (2019). “Harder and harder”? Is mainstream pornography becoming increasingly violent and do viewers prefer violent content?. The Journal of Sex Research, 56(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1451476 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  196. United States. (1986) Attorney general’s commission on pornography: Final report. US Department of Justice, Washington. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  197. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63, 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  198. Vannier, S. A., Currie, A. B., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2014). Schoolgirls and soccer moms: A content analysis of free “teen” and “MILF” online pornography. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(3), 253–264. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  199. Weaver, J. B., III. (1994). Pornography and sexual callousness: The perceptual and behavioral consequences of exposure to pornography. In D. Zillmann, J. Bryant, & A. C. Huston (Eds.), Media, children, and the family (1st ed., pp. 215–228). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  200. Wright, P. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior assessing the claim for causality. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 343–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679121 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  201. Wright, P. J., Paul, B., & Herbenick, D. (2021). Pornography, impersonal sex, and sexual aggression: A test of the confluence model in a national probability sample of men in the US. Aggressive behavior, 47(5), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21978 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  202. Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., Kraus, A., & Klann, E. (2017). Pornography consumption and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 43(3), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12108 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  203.   Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-465
  204. Antevska, A., & Gavey, N. (2015). “Out of sight and out of mind”. Men and Masculinities, 18(5), 605–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X15574339 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  205. Ballester-Arnal, R., García-Barba, M., Castro-Calvo, J., Giménez-García, C., & Gil-Llario, M. D. (2023). Pornography consumption in people of different age groups: An analysis based on gender, contents, and consequences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 20(2), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00720-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  206. Banks, J., & van Ouytsel, J. (2020). Cybersex with human- and machine-cued partners: Gratifications, shortcomings, and tensions. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  207. Brown, A., Barker, E. D., & Rahman, Q. (2020). A systematic scoping review of the prevalence, etiological, psychological, and interpersonal factors associated with BDSM. Journal of Sex Research, 57(6), 781–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1665619 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  208. Burch, R. L., & Salmon, C. (2021). Rough sex and pornography preferences: Novelty seeking, not aggression. EvoS Journal, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.59077/EZCH6547 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  209. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=1192162 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  210. Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  211. Döring, N. (2009). The Internet’s impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1089–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  212. Döring, N. (2023). Rough Sex: Aktueller Diskussions- und Forschungsstand [Rough sex: Current state of discussion and research]. Zeitschrift Für Sexualforschung, 36(02), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2014-1356 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  213. Döring, N., & Poeschl, S. (2019). Love and sex with robots: A content analysis of media representations. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(4), 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00517-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  214. Dubé, S., Santaguida, M., Zhu, C. Y., Di Tomasso, S., Hu, R., Cormier, G., Johnson, A. P., & Vachon, D. (2022). Sex robots and personality: It is more about sex than robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 136, 107403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107403 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  215. Dubé, S., Williams, M., Santaguida, M., Hu, R., Gadoury, T., Yim, B., Vachon, D., & Johnson, A. P. (2022). Hot for robots! Sexual arousal increases willingness to have sex with robots. Journal of Sex Research, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2142190 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  216. Forster, C. M., & Shaughnessy, S. (2024). Ctrl+alt+consent: Exploring the digital generation’s perspective on entirely computer-generated pornography. Bristol Institute for Learning and Teaching (BILT) Student Research Journal, (5). https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/ctrlaltconsent-exploring-the-digital-generations-perspective-on-e Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  217. Gerymski, R. (2017). Are personality traits a good predictors of the type of watched pornography? Analysis of the relationship between personality traits and the preference of a chosen pornographic categories. Przegląd Seksuologiczny, 15(3), 10–16. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=671425 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  218. Grudzen, C. R., Ryan, G., Margold, W., Torres, J., & Gelberg, L. (2009). Pathways to health risk exposure in adult film performers. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 86(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9309-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  219. Hald, G. M., & Štulhofer, A. (2016). What types of pornography do people find arousing and do they cluster? Assessing types and categories of pornography in a large-scale online sample. Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1065953 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  220. Herbenick, D., Fu, T., Valdivia, D. S., Patterson, C., Gonzalez, Y. R., Guerra-Reyes, L., Eastman-Mueller, H., Beckmeyer, J., & Rosenberg, M. (2021). What is rough sex, who does it, and who likes it? Findings from a probability sample of U.S. undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(3), 1183–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  221. Herbenick, D., Guerra-Reyes, L., Perry, C. P., Gonzalez, Y. R. R., Khan, S., Zounlomè, N. O. O., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2024). Navigating consent in the context of sexual choking/strangulation: Findings from qualitative interviews with young adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-01004-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  222. Herbenick, D., Patterson, C., Wright, P. J., Kawata, K., & Fu, T. (2023). Sexual choking/strangulation during sex: A review of the literature. Current Sexual Health Reports, 15(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-023-00373-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  223. Holvoet, L., Huys, W., Coppens, V., Seeuws, J., Goethals, K., & Morrens, M. (2017). Fifty shades of belgian gray: The prevalence of BDSM-related fantasies and activities in the general population. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14(9), 1152–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.07.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  224. Jarke, H. (2022). What do we know about the mental health of porn performers? A systematic literature review. The Journal of Public Mental Health, 21(2), 119–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a5tnb Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  225. Kimmel, M. S. (2005). The gender of desire. Essays an male sexuality. https://sunypress.edu/Books/T/The-Gender-of-Desire2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  226. Kinsey, A. C., Pomery, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). PsycTESTS Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t17515-000 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  227. McKee, A. (2006). The aesthetics of pornography: The insights of consumers. Continuum, 20(4), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310600988310 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  228. Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 477–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  229. Mosher, D. L. (1988). Pornography defined: Sexual involvement theory, narrative context, and goodness-of-fit. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 1(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v01n01_06 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  230. Parvez, Z. F. (2006). The labor of pleasure: How perceptions of emotional labor impact womens enjoyment of pornography. Gender & Society, 20(5), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206291109 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  231. Price, J., Patterson, R., Regnerus, M., & Walley, J. (2016). How much more XXX is generation X consuming? Evidence of changing attitudes and behaviors related to pornography since 1973. Journal of Sex Research, 53(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.1003773 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  232. Rubin, G. S. (1998). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory. In P. M. Nardi & B. E. Schneider (Eds.), Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies: A reader (pp. 100–133). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  233. Rubin, G. S. (2006). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In R. Parker & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Culture, Society and Sexuality: A Reader (1st ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  234. Saunders, R. (2019). Computer-generated pornography and convergence: Animation and algorithms as new digital desire. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 25(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519833591 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  235. Sharkey, M. J., Currin, J. M., Cox, K., Golden, B. L., Evans, A. E., & Garos, S. (2022). ‘Horny and wanting to watch something’: an exploratory qualitative analysis of heterosexual men’s pornography viewing preferences. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1824937 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  236. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26(4), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  237. Szczuka, J. M. (2022). Flirting with or through media: How the communication partners’ ontological class and sexual priming affect heterosexual males’ interest in flirtatious messages and their perception of the source. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 719008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.719008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  238. Szczuka, J. M., & Dehnert, M. (2024). Sexualized Robots: Use Cases, Normative Debates, and the Need for Research. In Nick Bowman (Ed.), Emerging issues for emerging technologies: informed provocations for theorizing media futures. Peter Lang Publishing Incorporated. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  239. Szczuka, J. M., Hartmann, T., & Krämer, N. C. (2019). Negative and positive influences on the sensations evoked by artificial sex partners: A review of relevant theories, recent findings, and introduction of the sexual interaction illusion model. In Y. Zhou & M. H. Fischer (Eds.), AI Love You (pp. 3–19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19734-6_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  240. Szczuka, J. M., & Krämer, N. C. (2017). Not only the lonely—How men explicitly and implicitly evaluate the attractiveness of sex robots in comparison to the attractiveness of women, and personal characteristics influencing this evaluation. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1010003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  241. Taylor, K. (2022). “I’ve got to put one side aside if I want to enjoy it”: Pornography, perceived reality, and pornography viewers’ negotiated pleasures. Sexuality & Culture, 26(4), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09939-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  242. Taylor-Johnson, S. (Director). (2015). Fifty Shades of Grey. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505
  243. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other (Third edition, revised trade paperback edition). Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2024-4-505

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien