Breaking Barriers: Accelerating the Transition to a Circular Economy

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Swiss Journal of Business Jahrgang 79 (2025), Heft 3
Open Access Vollzugriff

Swiss Journal of Business

Jahrgang 79 (2025), Heft 3

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2025
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
ISSN-Print
2944-3741

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 79 (2025), Heft 3

Breaking Barriers: Accelerating the Transition to a Circular Economy

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2944-3741
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
Kapitelvorschau:

Der globale Ressourcenverbrauch nimmt kontinuierlich zu und beschleunigt damit die Überschreitung planetarer Grenzen. Die Lösung der damit verbundenen Umweltprobleme erfordert gezielte Massnahmen und einen systemischen Wandel vom vorherrschenden linearen Wirtschaftsmodell hin zu einem zirkulären. Dieser Artikel verfolgt einen systemischen Ansatz, um die Transformationsbarrieren auf verschiedenen relevanten Ebenen zu identifizieren – darunter Produkt-, Unternehmens-, Ökosystem-, Industrie- sowie gesellschaftliche und regulatorische Systeme. Er leistet einen Beitrag zur Forschung, indem er die Barrieren anhand von acht zugrunde liegenden Mechanismen strukturiert und darstellt. Diese Mechanismen erklären, wie die Barrieren funktionieren und weshalb sie den Wandel von linearen zu zirkulären sozio-technischen Regimen behindern. So beschreibt etwa das Gefangenendilemma, wie kurzfristige Eigeninteressen häufig kollektive Vorteile überlagern und dadurch zu suboptimalen Ergebnissen führen. Gleichzeitig geben diese Mechanismen Hinweise auf potenzielle Lösungsansätze, um die Barrieren zu überwinden und die Umsetzung einer zirkulären Wirtschaft zu beschleunigen. Anhand praxisnaher Beispiele wird veranschaulicht, dass das „Durchbrechen von Barrieren“ sowohl möglich als auch notwendig ist – insbesondere durch verschiedene Formen der Zusammenarbeit.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Ayres, R. U. (1997). Industrial Metabolism: Work in Progress. INSEAD Working Paper Series. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  2. Bocken, N. M. P., Pauw, I. De, Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  3. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., Del Vecchio, P., & Urbinati, A. (2020). Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1734–1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  4. Circle Economy. (2025). The Circularity Gap Report 2025. https://www.circularity-gap.world/2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  5. Desing, H., Brunner, D., Takacs, F., Naharath, S., Frankenberger, K., & Hischier, R. (2020). A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 155. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  6. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1162/108819806775545321/abstract Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  7. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Growth within: A Circular Economy vision for a competitive Europe. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  8. Frankenberger, K., Takacs, F., & Stechow, R. (2021). A step toward making your company more sustainable. HBR.Org. https://hbr.org/2021/01/a-step-toward-making-your-company-more-sustainable Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  9. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  10. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  11. Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  12. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  13. Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  14. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  15. Morseletto, P. (2020). Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(4), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12987 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  16. Takacs, F., Brunner, D., & Frankenberger, K. (2022). Barriers to a circular economy in small- and medium-sized enterprises and their integration in a sustainable strategic management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 132227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132227 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  17. Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Chiesa, V. (2017). Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-199
  18. Agamuthu, P., & Visvanathan, C. (2014). Extended producers’ responsibility schemes for used beverage carton recycling. Waste Management and Research, 32(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13517611 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  19. Ahmadov, T., Durst, S., Gerstlberger, W., & Kraut, E. (2023). SMEs on the way to a circular economy: insights from a multi-perspective review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00380-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  20. Akemu, O., Whiteman, G., & Kennedy, S. (2016). Social enterprise emergence from social movement activism: The Fairphone case. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 846–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12208 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  21. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  22. Arranz, C. F. A., Arroyabe, M. F., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2024). Organisational transformation toward circular economy in SMEs. The effect of internal barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142307 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  23. Awan, U., Sroufe, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2038–2060. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2731 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  24. Axelrod, R. (1980). Effective choice in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1), 3–25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  25. Ayres, R. U. (1996). Limits to the growth paradigm. Ecological Economics, 19, 117–134. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  26. Ayres, R. U. (1997). Industrial Metabolism: Work in progress. INSEAD Working Paper Series. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  27. Bakker, C., Hollander, D., van Hinte, E., & Zijlstra, Y. (2014). Products that last: Product design for circular business models. TU Delft Library. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  28. Barros, M., & Dimla, E. (2021). From planned obsolescence to the circular economy in the smartphone industry: An evolution of strategies embodied in product features. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.422 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  29. Bateman, I. J., & Mace, G. M. (2020). The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making. Nature Sustainability, 3(10), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  30. Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge university press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  31. Berardi, P. C., & de Brito, R. P. (2021). Supply chain collaboration for a circular economy-From transition to continuous improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, 129511. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  32. Berardi, P. C., & Peregrino de Brito, R. (2021). Supply chain collaboration for a circular economy – From transition to continuous improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129511 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  33. Berkhout, F. (2002). Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 12(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00025-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  34. Bocken, N. M. P., & Konietzko, J. (2022). Circular business model innovation in consumer-facing corporations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122076 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  35. Bocken, N. M. P., Pauw, I. De, Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  36. Bocken, N. M. P., Schuit, C. S. C., & Kraaijenhagen, C. (2018). Experimenting with a circular business model: Lessons from eight cases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.02.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  37. Boyer, R. H. W., Hunka, A. D., Linder, M., Whalen, K. A., & Habibi, S. (2021). Product labels for the Circular Economy: Are customers willing to pay for circular? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.010 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  38. Bressanelli, G., Saccani, N., Perona, M., & Baccanelli, I. (2020). Towards circular economy in the household appliance industry: An overview of cases. Resources, 9(11), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9110128 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  39. Brown, P., Bocken, N., & Balkenende, R. (2020). How do companies collaborate for circular oriented innovation? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041648 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  40. Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., & Pettersen, I. N. (2018). Consumption in the circular economy: A literature review. Sustainability, 10(8), 2758. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  41. Cantú, A., Aguiñaga, E., & Scheel, C. (2021). Learning from failure and success: The challenges for circular economy implementation in SMEs in an emerging economy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031529 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  42. Chander, P., & Tulkens, H. (1997). The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities. In International Journal of Game Theory (Vol. 26). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  43. Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223–2247. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1863 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  44. Cho, Y.-N., Thyroff, A., Rapert, M. I., Park, S.-Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). To be or not to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1052–1059. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  45. Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  46. Circle Economy. (2025). The Circularity Gap Report 2025. https://www.circularity-gap.world/2025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  47. Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  48. Collste, D., Cornell, S. E., Randers, J., Rockström, J., & Stoknes, P. E. (2021). Human well-being in the Anthropocene: Limits to growth. Global Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.26 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  49. Corso, M., & Pellegrini, L. (2007). Continuous and discontinuous innovation: Overcoming the Innovator Dilemma. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00459.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  50. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Farberll, S., Grassot, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O, R. V, Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., & Suttonllll, P. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  51. Costanza, R., Hart, M., Talberth, J., & Posner, S. (2009). Beyond GDP: The need for new measures of progress. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/iss_pub Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  52. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY (Vol. 75, Issue 2). The American Economic Review. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  53. de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  54. Delucchi, M. A. (2000). Environmental externalities of motor-vehicle use in the US. In Source: Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (Vol. 34, Issue 2). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  55. Desing, H., Braun, G., & Hischier, R. (2020). Ecological resource availability: A method to estimate resource budgets for a sustainable economy. Global Sustainability, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.26 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  56. Desing, H., Braun, G., & Hischier, R. (2021). Resource pressure – A circular design method. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 164, 105179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105179 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  57. Desing, H., Brunner, D., Takacs, F., Nahrath, S., Frankenberger, K., & Hischier, R. (2020). A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104673 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  58. Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization Studies, 26(3), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050873 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  59. Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41–52. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  60. Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2020). Evaluating the adoption of circular economy practices in industrial supply chains: An empirical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122966 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  61. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1162/108819806775545321/abstract Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  62. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, & IDEO. (2020). The Circular Design Guide. https://www.circulardesignguide.com/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  63. Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2018). Introducing a Circular Economy: New thinking with new managerial and policy implications. California Management Review, 60(3), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618764691 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  64. European Commission. (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_en Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  65. Evertsen, P. H., & Knotten, V. (2024). Toward a collaborative circular ecosystem within the built environment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 52, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  66. Fenichel, E. P., & Abbott, J. K. (2014). Natural Capital: From metaphor to measurement. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1(1/2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/676034 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  67. Fischer, A., & Pascucci, S. (2017). Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.038 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  68. Flynn, A., & Hacking, N. (2019). Setting standards for a circular economy: A challenge too far for neoliberal environmental governance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 1256–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.257 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  69. Frankenberger, K., Mayer, H., Reiter, A., & Schmidt, M. (2020). The digital transformer’s dilemma: How to energize your core business while building disruptive products and services. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  70. Frankenberger, K., Takacs, F., & Stechow, R. (2021). A step toward making your company more sustainable. HBR.Org. https://hbr.org/2021/01/a-step-toward-making-your-company-more-sustainable Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  71. Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015). Managing co-creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British Journal of Management, 26, 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12087 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  72. Gallego-Schmid, A., Chen, H. M., Sharmina, M., & Mendoza, J. M. F. (2020). Links between circular economy and climate change mitigation in the built environment. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 260). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121115 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  73. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  74. Geels, F. W. (2006). Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: A multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850–1930). Technology in Society, 28(4), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.09.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  75. Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  76. Geels, F. W. (2022). Causality and explanation in socio-technical transitions research: Mobilising epistemological insights from the wider social sciences. Research Policy, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104537 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  77. Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  78. Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 712–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  79. Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Soufani, K. (2020). Circular business models: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  80. Geissdoerfer, M., Santa-Maria, T., Kirchherr, J., & Pelzeter, C. (2023). Drivers and barriers for circular business model innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3814–3832. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3339 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  81. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  82. George, B., Pandey, S. K., Steijn, B., Decramer, A., & Audenaert, M. (2021). Red tape, organizational performance, and employee outcomes: Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and research agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13327 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  83. Godinho Filho, M., Gonella, J. dos S. L., Latan, H., & Ganga, G. M. D. (2024). Awareness as a catalyst for sustainable behaviors: A theoretical exploration of planned behavior and value-belief-norms in the circular economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122181 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  84. Goering, G. E. (1997). Product durability and moral hazard. Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 399–411. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  85. Goldsmith, R. E., & Clark, R. A. (2012). Materialism, status consumption, and consumer independence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152(1), 43–60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  86. Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018a). A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 278–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  87. Grafström, J., & Aasma, S. (2021). Breaking circular economy barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  88. Grillo, F., Wiegmann, P. M., de Vries, H. J., Bekkers, R., Tasselli, S., Yousefi, A., & van de Kaa, G. (2024). Standardization: Research trends, current debates, and interdisciplinarity. Academy of Management Annals, 18(2), 788–830. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  89. Guldmann, E., & Huulgaard, R. D. (2020). Barriers to circular business model innovation: A multiple-case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118160 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  90. Gupta, S., Chen, H., Hazen, B. T., Kaur, S., & Santibañez Gonzalez, E. D. R. (2019). Circular economy and big data analytics: A stakeholder perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.030 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  91. Hamzaoui Essoussi, L., & Linton, J. D. (2010). New or recycled products: How much are consumers willing to pay? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011063358 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  92. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-1224%28198404%2949%3A2%3C149%3ASIAOC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  93. Hansen, E. G., & Schmitt, J. C. (2021). Orchestrating cradle-to-cradle innovation across the value chain: Overcoming barriers through innovation communities, collaboration mechanisms, and intermediation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(3), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13081 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  94. Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 198–2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  95. Hart, J., Adams, K., Giesekam, J., Tingley, D. D., & Pomponi, F. (2019). Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: The case of the built environment. Procedia CIRP, 80, 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  96. Henrysson, M., & Nuur, C. (2021). The role of institutions in creating Circular Economy pathways for regional development. Journal of Environment and Development, 30(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496521991876 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  97. Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth Possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  98. Hina, M., Chauhan, C., Kaur, P., Kraus, S., & Dhir, A. (2022). Drivers and barriers of circular economy business models: Where we are now, and where we are heading. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130049 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  99. Ho, C. H., Böhm, S., & Monciardini, D. (2022). The collaborative and contested interplay between business and civil society in circular economy transitions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(6), 2714–2727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  100. Hofmann, F. (2019). Circular business models: Business approach as driver or obstructer of sustainability transitions? Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.115 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  101. Hofmann, F., & Jaeger-Erben, M. (2020). Organizational transition management of circular business model innovations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2770–2788. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2542 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  102. Hofmann Trevisan, A., Gonçalves Castro, C., Augusto De Vasconcelos Gomes, L., & Mascarenhas, J. (2023). Circular ecosystem structure and orchestration: outlining actions to innovate, integrate, and invest. Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, 897–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.90 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  103. Hummel, K., & Jobst, D. (2024). An overview of corporate sustainability reporting legislation in the European Union. Accounting in Europe. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2024.2312145 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  104. Hummen, T., & Desing, H. (2021). When to replace products with which (circular) strategy? An optimization approach and lifespan indicator. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105704 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  105. Ianole-Călin, R., Francioni, B., Masili, G., Druică, E., & Goschin, Z. (2020). A cross-cultural analysis of how individualism and collectivism impact collaborative consumption. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104762 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  106. IMF. (2025). Fossil fuel subsidies. https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/climate-change/energy-subsidies Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  107. International Resource Panel. (2024). Global Resources Outlook 2024. https://www.unep.org/resources/Global-Resource-Outlook-2024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  108. Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow. Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  109. Jaeger, B., & Upadhyay, A. (2020). Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(4), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0047 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  110. Jäger-Roschko, M., & Petersen, M. (2022). Advancing the circular economy through information sharing: A systematic literature review. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 369). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133210 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  111. Jain, S. (2019). Time inconsistency and product design: A strategic analysis of feature creep. Marketing Science, 38(5), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1170 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  112. Kallis, G. (2017). Radical dematerialization and degrowth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 375(2095). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0383 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  113. Kanda, W., Geissdoerfer, M., & Hjelm, O. (2021). From circular business models to circular business ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(6), 2814–2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2895 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  114. Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  115. Khan, A. A., & Abonyi, J. (2022). Information sharing in supply chains – Interoperability in an era of circular economy. In Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain (Vol. 5). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100074 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  116. Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  117. Kissling, R., Coughlan, D., Fitzpatrick, C., Boeni, H., Luepschen, C., Andrew, S., & Dickenson, J. (2013). Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 80, 21–31. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  118. Kitching, J., Hart, M., & Wilson, N. (2015). Burden or benefit? Regulation as a dynamic influence on small business performance. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(2), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613493454 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  119. Köhler, J., Sönnichsen, S. D., & Beske‐Jansen, P. (2022). Towards a collaboration framework for circular economy: The role of dynamic capabilities and open innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(6), 2700–2713. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  120. Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020a). A tool to analyze, ideate and develop circular innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(417). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010417 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  121. Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020b). Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  122. Kumar, V., Sezersan, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Gonzalez, E. D. R. S., & AL-Shboul, M. A. (2019). Circular economy in the manufacturing sector: benefits, opportunities and barriers. Management Decision, 57(4), 1067–1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2018-1070 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  123. Lahti, T., Wincent, J., & Parida, V. (2018). A definition and theoretical review of the circular economy, value creation, and sustainable business models: Where are we now and where should research move in the future? In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 10, Issue 8). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082799 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  124. Lauten-Weiss, J., Friege, H., Westphal, I., & Brinker, J. (2024). Dynamics of business models in Circular Economy: Shifting challenges in pilot projects. Sustainability & Circularity NOW, 1(continuous publication). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  125. Llorente-González, L. J., & Vence, X. (2020). How labour-intensive is the circular economy? A policy-orientated structural analysis of the repair, reuse and recycling activities in the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105033. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  126. Löfgren, K.-G., Persson, T., & Weibull, J. W. (2002). Markets with asymmetric information: The contributions of George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(2), 195–211. https://about.jstor.org/terms Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  127. Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  128. Luchs, M. G., Brower, J., & Chitturi, R. (2012). Product choice and the importance of aesthetic design given the emotion-laden trade-off between sustainability and functional performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00970.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  129. Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. In Journal of Marketing (Vol. 74, Issue 5). https://scholarworks.wm.edu/businesspubs Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  130. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2018). A review and typology of Circular Economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 00(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12763 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  131. Lumpkin, G. T., & Brigham, K. H. (2011). Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1149–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00495.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  132. Magnusson, T., & Werner, V. (2023). Conceptualisations of incumbent firms in sustainability transitions: Insights from organisation theory and a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(2), 903–919. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  133. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  134. Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2006). Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? Research Policy, 35(5), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  135. Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U., Vivien, F. D., & Zaccai, E. (2010). Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  136. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  137. Meade, J. E. (1973). The Theory of Economic Externalities. A. W. Sijthoff, 1973, 92 p., DFL 22.00. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  138. Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  139. Michaud, C., & Llerena, D. (2011). Green consumer behaviour: An experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 408–420. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  140. Moreau, V., Sahakian, M., van Griethuysen, P., & Vuille, F. (2017). Coming full circle: Why social and institutional dimensions matter for the Circular Economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  141. Morseletto, P. (2020). Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(4), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12987 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  142. Morseletto, P. (2023). Sometimes linear, sometimes circular: States of the economy and transitions to the future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136138 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  143. Nag, U., Sharma, S. K., & Kumar, V. (2022). Multiple life-cycle products: A review of antecedents, outcomes, challenges, and benefits in a Circular Economy. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(3), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2021.2020219 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  144. Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 36(1), 48–49. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  145. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  146. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. In Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 28, pp. 185–206). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  147. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  148. Özkan, P., & Karataş Yücel, E. (2020). Linear Economy to Circular Economy. In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Development and Opportunities in Circular Economy (pp. 61–86). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5116-5.ch004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  149. Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J., & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  150. Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 974–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309360280 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  151. Paha, J. (2023). Sustainability agreements and first mover disadvantages. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 19(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhad007 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  152. Parida, V., Burström, T., Visnjic, I., & Wincent, J. (2019). Orchestrating industrial ecosystem in circular economy: A two-stage transformation model for large manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 101(January), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  153. Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  154. Pavel, S. (2018). Circular Economy: The beauty ofcircularity in value chain. Journal of Economics and Business, 1(4), 584–598. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.01.04.52 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  155. Peng, B., & Shen, X. (2024). Does environmental regulation affect Circular Economy performance? Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114406 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  156. Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00753.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  157. Pickman, H. A. (1999). The effect of environmental regulation on environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7(4), 223–233. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  158. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. In Source: The American Political Science Review (Vol. 94, Issue 2). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  159. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain – Policy report. In PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (Issue 2544). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  160. Pretner, G., Darnall, N., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2021). Are consumers willing to pay for circular products? The role of recycled and second-hand attributes, messaging, and third-party certification. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105888 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  161. Quairel‐Lanoizelée, F. (2011). Are competition and corporate social responsibility compatible? Society and Business Review, 6(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465681111105850 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  162. Raworth, K. (2017). Die Donut-Ökonomie. Hanser. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  163. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Drüke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., Von Bloh, W., Feulner, G., Fiedler, S., Gerten, D., Gleeson, T., Hofmann, M., Huiskamp, W., Kummu, M., Mohan, C., Nogués-Bravo, D., … Rockström, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9. https://www.science.org Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  164. Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological Change. In Human Choice and Climate Change (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  165. Ritzén, S., & Sandström, G. Ö. (2017). Barriers to the Circular Economy – integration of perspectives and domains. Procedia CIRP, 64, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  166. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Kafyeke, T., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., & Ioannou, A. (2015). The Circular Economy: Barriers and opportunities for SMEs. Ceps Working Document, 412. https://www.ceps.eu/publications/circular-economy-barriers-and-opportunities-smes Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  167. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., & Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. (2016). Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability, 8(11), 1212. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  168. Rizzati, M., & Landoni, M. (2024). A systematic review of agent-based modelling in the circular economy: Insights towards a general model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 69, 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2024.03.013 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  169. Robèrt, K. H., & Broman, G. (2017). Prisoners’ dilemma misleads business and policy making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.069 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  170. Rockström, J., Steffen, W. L., Noone, K., Persson, A., & Chapin III, F. S. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  171. Rosenschöld, J., Rozema, J. G., & Frye-Levine, L. A. (2014). Institutional inertia and climate change: A review of the new institutionalist literature. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(5), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.292 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  172. Ross, S. A. (1973). The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem (Vol. 63, Issue 2). American Economic Association. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  173. Salmenperä, H., Pitkänen, K., Kautto, P., & Saikku, L. (2021). Critical factors for enhancing the circular economy in waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124339. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  174. Santa-Maria, T., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2021). Framing and assessing the emergent field of business model innovation for the circular economy: A combined literature review and multiple case study approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 872–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.037 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  175. Saracevic, S., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Wu, T. (2022). How normative appeals influence pro-environmental behavior: The role of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131086 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  176. Sarja, M., Onkila, T., & Mäkelä, M. (2021). A systematic literature review of the transition to the circular economy in business organizations: Obstacles, catalysts and ambivalences. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 286). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125492 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  177. Schmelzer, M. (2015). The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmans Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-205
  178. Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockstrom, J., & Lenton, T. M. (2022). Exceeding 1.5 degrees C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. In Science (Vol. 377, Issue 6611, p. eabn7950). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  179. Barnhart, C. J., & Benson, S. M. (2013). On the importance of reducing the energetic and material demands of electrical energy storage. In Energy and Environmental Science (Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp. 1083–1092). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  180. Bärnthaler, R., Novy, A., & Plank, L. (2021). The foundational economy as a cornerstone for a social–ecological transformation. In Sustainability (Vol. 13, Issue 18). www.doi.org/10.3390/su131810460 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  181. Baum, H.-G. (2018). Eco-efficiency—A measure to determine optimal recycling rates? In J. Fellner, D. Laner, & J. Lederer (Eds.), Science to support circular economy. Christian Doppler Laboratory “Anthropogenic Resources”, TU Wien Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management. https://iwr.tuwien.ac.at/circular-economy/home/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  182. Blomsma, F., & Brennan, G. (2017). The emergence of circular economy: A new framing around prolonging resource productivity. In Journal of Industrial Ecology (Vol. 21, Issue 3, pp. 603–614). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  183. Blum, N., Haupt, M., & Benning, C. (2020). Why «Circular» doesn’t always mean «Sustainable». In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 162). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  184. Bocken, N. M. P., Pauw, I. D., Bakker, C., Grinten, B. V. D., Bocken, N. M. P., Pauw, I. D., Bakker, C., & Grinten, B. V. D. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. In Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering (Vol. 1015, pp. 1–12). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  185. Bocken, N. M. P., Stahel, W., Dobrauz, G., Koumbarakis, A., Obst, M., & Matzdorf, P. (2021). Circularity as the new normal—Whitepaper [Report]. PwC, WWF. www.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25761.22885 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  186. Carrara, S., Bobba, S., Blagoeva, D., Alves Dias, P., Cavalli, A., Georgitzikis, K., Grohol, M., Itul, A., Kuzov, T., Latunussa, C., Lyons, L., Malano, G., Maury, T., Prior Arce, A., Somers, J., Telsnig, T., Veeh, C., Wittmer, D., Black, C., … Christou, M. (2023). Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sectors in the EU - A foresight study [Report]. Publications Office of the European Union. www.doi.org/10.2760/386650 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  187. Chen, C., Chaudhary, A., & Mathys, A. (2019). Dietary change scenarios and implications for environmental, nutrition, human health and economic dimensions of food sustainability. In Nutrients (Vol. 11, Issue 4). www.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040856 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  188. Circle economy. (2023). Circularity gap report [Report]. Circle Economy. www.circularity-gap.world Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  189. Creutzig, F., Kopp, M., Berrill, P., Desing, H., Javaid, A., Mastrucci, A., Milojevic-Dupond, N., Nachtigall, F., Napiontel, J., Schlesier, H., Silva, M., Wiedenhofer, D., & Zharova, A. (submitted). Towards an integrated understanding of urban design, sustainability and circularity. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  190. Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W. F., Azevedo, I. M. L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dalkmann, H., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Geels, F. W., Grubler, A., Hepburn, C., Hertwich, E. G., Khosla, R., Mattauch, L., Minx, J. C., Ramakrishnan, A., Rao, N. D., Steinberger, J. K., Tavoni, M., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., & Weber, E. U. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. In Nature Climate Change (Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 260–263). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  191. Creutzig, F., Simoes, S. G., Leipold, S., Berrill, P., Azevedo, I., Edelenbosch, O., Fishman, T., Haberl, H., Hertwich, E., Krey, V., Lima, A. T., Makov, T., Mastrucci, A., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Nachtigall, F., Pauliuk, S., Silva, M., Verdolini, E., van Vuuren, D., … Wilson, C. (2024). Demand-side strategies key for mitigating material impacts of energy transitions. In Nature Climate Change (Vol. 14, Issue 6, pp. 561–572). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  192. Desing, H. (2022). Below zero. In Environmental Science: Advances (pp. 612–619). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  193. Desing, H. (2024). E-retrofitting busses for a faster mobility turnaround and preservation of resources. https://circeular.org/e-retrofitting-busses-for-a-faster-mobility-turnaround-and-preservation-of-resources/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  194. Desing, H., & Blum, N. (2023). On circularity, complexity and (elements of) hope. In Circular Economy (Vol. 1, Issue 1). www.doi.org/10.55845/WNHN7338 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  195. Desing, H., Braun, G., & Hischier, R. (2020). Ecological resource availability: A method to estimate resource budgets for a sustainable economy. In Global Sustainability (Vol. 3, pp. 1–11). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  196. Desing, H., Brunner, D., Takacs, F., Nahrath, S., Frankenberger, K., & Hischier, R. (2020). A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 155). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104673 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  197. Desing, H., Gerber, A., Hischier, R., Wäger, P., & Widmer, R. (2022). The 3‐machines energy transition model: Exploring the energy frontiers for restoring a habitable climate. In Earth’s Future (Vol. 10, Issue 10, pp. 1–15). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  198. Desing, H., Schlesier, H., & Gauch, M. (2025). Solar Basic Service—Just acceleration of the energy transition. In Progress in Energy. www.doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/adc370 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  199. Desing, H., & Widmer, R. (2021). Reducing climate risks with fast and complete energy transitions: Applying the precautionary principle to the Paris agreement. In Environmental Research Letters (Vol. 16, Issue 12, p. 121002). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  200. Desing, H., & Widmer, R. (2022). How much energy storage can we afford? On the need for a sunflower society, aligning demand with renewable supply. In Biophysical Economics and Sustainability (Vol. 7, Issue 3, p. 3). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  201. Desing, H., Widmer, R., Bardi, U., Beylot, A., Billy, R. G., Gasser, M., Gauch, M., Monfort, D., Müller, D. B., Raugei, M., Remmen, K., Schenker, V., Schlesier, H., Valdivia, S., & Wäger, P. (2024). Mobilizing materials to enable a fast energy transition: A conceptual framework. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 200). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107314 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  202. Desing, H., Widmer, R., Beloin-Saint-Pierre, D., Hischier, R., & Wäger, P. (2019). Powering a sustainable and circular economy—An engineering approach to estimating renewable energy potentials within earth system boundaries. In Energies (Vol. 12, Issue 24, pp. 1–18). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  203. Ditlevsen, P., & Ditlevsen, S. (2023). Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. In Nature communications (Vol. 14, Issue 1, p. 4254). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  204. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Completing the picture—How the circular economy tackles climate change [Report]. EMF. www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  205. European Commission. (2020). A new circular economy action plan—For a cleaner and more competitive europe [Report]. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_de Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  206. European Environmental Bureau. (2019). Decoupling Debunked—Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability [Report]. EEB. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  207. European Environmental Bureau. (2021). Sufficiency and Circularity—The two overlooked decarbonisation strategies in the fit for 55 package [Report]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  208. Fuss, S., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., Luderer, G., Nemet, G. F., Rogelj, J., Smith, P., Vicente, J. L. V., Wilcox, J., del Mar Zamora Dominguez, M., & Minx, J. C. (2018). Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. In Environmental Research Letters (Vol. 13, Issue 6). www.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  209. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 143, pp. 757–768). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  210. Gerten, D., Heck, V., Jägermeyr, J., Bodirsky, B. L., Fetzer, I., Jalava, M., Kummu, M., Lucht, W., Rockström, J., Schaphoff, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2020). Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries. In Nature Sustainability. www.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0465-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  211. Gerwin, M. (2022). Deliberative democracy: Waldenia-model [Report]. bluedemocracy.pl Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  212. Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2021). The dawn of everything—A new history of humanity. Allen Lane. https://dawnofeverything.industries Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  213. Griscom, B. W., Adams, J., Ellis, P. W., Houghton, R. A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D. A., Schlesinger, W. H., Shoch, D., Siikamaki, J. V., Smith, P., Woodbury, P., Zganjar, C., Blackman, A., Campari, J., Conant, R. T., Delgado, C., Elias, P., Gopalakrishna, T., Hamsik, M. R., … Fargione, J. (2017). Natural climate solutions. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 114, Issue 44, pp. 11645–11650). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  214. Grübel, B., Cimiotti, G., Schmiga, C., Schellinger, S., Steinhauser, B., Brand, A. A., Kamp, M., Sieber, M., Brunner, D., Fox, S., & Kluska, S. (2021). Progress of plated metallization for industrial bifacial TOPCon silicon solar cells. In Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications (Vol. 30, Issue 6, pp. 615–621). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  215. Hallam, B., Kim, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Lennon, A., Verlinden, P., Altermatt, P. P., & Dias, P. R. (2022). The silver learning curve for photovoltaics and projected silver demand for net‐zero emissions by 2050. In Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications (Vol. 31, Issue 6, pp. 598–606). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  216. Haupt, M., Waser, E., Wurmli, J. C., & Hellweg, S. (2018). Is there an environmentally optimal separate collection rate? In Waste management (New York, N.Y.) (Vol. 77, pp. 220–224). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  217. Heath, G. A., Silverman, T. J., Kempe, M., Deceglie, M., Ravikumar, D., Remo, T., Cui, H., Sinha, P., Libby, C., Shaw, S., Komoto, K., Wambach, K., Butler, E., Barnes, T., & Wade, A. (2020). Research and development priorities for silicon photovoltaic module recycling to support a circular economy. In Nature Energy (Vol. 5, Issue 7, pp. 502–510). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  218. Heide, M., Hauschild, M. Z., & Ryberg, M. (2023). Reflecting the importance of human needs fulfilment in absolute sustainability assessments: Development of a sharing principle. In Journal of Industrial Ecology (Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 1151–1164). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  219. Hummen, T., & Desing, H. (2021). When to replace products with which (circular) strategy? An optimization approach and lifespan indicator. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 174). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105704 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  220. IEA. (2023). Critical minerals market review 2023 [Report]. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/critical-minerals-market-review-2023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  221. IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services [Report]. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  222. IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022—Impacts, adaption and vulerability [Report]. IPCC. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  223. Ivanova, M., Rogalla, M., & Desing, H. (2024). Zukunfts(K)reise—How we can create planet-compatible circularity. Empa, PHSG. https://www.empa.ch/web/zukunftskreise/the-book Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  224. Kikstra, J. S., Daioglou, V., Min, J., Sferra, F., Soergel, B., Kriegler, E., Lee, H., Mastrucci, A., Pachauri, S., Rao, N., Rauner, S., van Vuuren, D., Riahi, K., van Ruijven, B., & Rogelj, J. (2025). Closing decent living gaps in energy and emissions scenarios: Introducing DESIRE. Environmental Research Letters, 20(5), 054038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adc3ad Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  225. Kikstra, J. S., Mastrucci, A., Min, J., Riahi, K., & Rao, N. D. (2021). Decent living gaps and energy needs around the world. In Environmental Research Letters (Vol. 16, Issue 9). www.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1c27 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  226. Lebre, E., Stringer, M., Svobodova, K., Owen, J. R., Kemp, D., Cote, C., Arratia-Solar, A., & Valenta, R. K. (2020). The social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metals. In Nature communications (Vol. 11, Issue 1, p. 4823). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  227. Lennon, A., Lunardi, M., Hallam, B., & Dias, P. R. (2022). The aluminium demand risk of terawatt photovoltaics for net zero emissions by 2050. In Nature Sustainability (Vol. 5, Issue 4, pp. 357–363). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  228. Lenton, T. M., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Loriani, S., Abrams, J. F., Lade, S. J., Donges, J. F., Milkoreit, M., Powell, T., Smith, S. R., Zimm, C., Buxton, J. E., Bailey, E., Laybourn, L., Ghadiali, A., & Dyke, J. G. (2023). The global tipping points report 2023 [Report]. University of Exeter. www.global-tipping-points.org Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  229. Lura, P., Lunati, I., Desing, H., Heuberger, M., Bach, C., & Richner, P. (2025). Mining the atmosphere: A concrete solution to global warming. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 212). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107968 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  230. Millward-Hopkins, J. (2022). Inequality can double the energy required to secure universal decent living. In Nature communications (Vol. 13, Issue 1, p. 5028). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  231. Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D., & Oswald, Y. (2020). Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario. In Global Environmental Change (Vol. 65, p. 102168). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  232. O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. In Nature Sustainability (Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 88–95). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  233. Pauliuk, S. (2024). Decent living standards, prosperity, and excessive consumption in the Lorenz curve. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 220). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108161 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  234. Persson, L., Carney Almroth, B. M., Collins, C. D., Cornell, S., de Wit, C. A., Diamond, M. L., Fantke, P., Hassellov, M., MacLeod, M., Ryberg, M. W., Sogaard Jorgensen, P., Villarrubia-Gomez, P., Wang, Z., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2022). Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. In Environmental science & technology (Vol. 56, Issue 3, pp. 1510–1521). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  235. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain (Policy Report No. 2544). PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  236. Rao, N. D., & Min, J. (2018). Decent living standards: Material prerequisites for human wellbeing. In Social indicators research (Vol. 138, Issue 1, pp. 225–244). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  237. Raworth, K. (2013). Defining a safe and just space for humanity. In State of the world 2013: Is sustainability still possible? www.doi.org/DOI 10.5822/ 978-1-61091-458-1_3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  238. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Druke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., von Bloh, W., Feulner, G., Fiedler, S., Gerten, D., Gleeson, T., Hofmann, M., Huiskamp, W., Kummu, M., Mohan, C., Nogues-Bravo, D., … Rockstrom, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. In Science advances (Vol. 9, Issue 37, p. eadh2458). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  239. Rockström, J., Gupta, J., Qin, D., Lade, S. J., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Bai, X., Bala, G., Bunn, S. E., Ciobanu, D., DeClerck, F., Ebi, K., Gifford, L., Gordon, C., Hasan, S., Kanie, N., Lenton, T. M., Loriani, S., … Zhang, X. (2023). Safe and just Earth system boundaries. In Nature. www.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  240. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schnellhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., … Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. In Ecology and Society (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 1–33). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  241. Schlesier, H., Guillen-Gosalbez, G., & Desing, H. (in review). Digesting fossil infrastructure for cleaner energy transitions. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6346491/v1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  242. Schlesier, H., Schäfer, M., & Desing, H. (2024). Measuring the Doughnut: A good life for all is possible within planetary boundaries. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 448). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141447 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  243. Schmalz, D. (2025). Das bevölkerungsargument (1st ed.). Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  244. Shepon, A., Eshel, G., Noor, E., & Milo, R. (2018). The opportunity cost of animal based diets exceeds all food losses. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 115, Issue 15, pp. 3804–3809). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  245. Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., de Vries, W., Vermeulen, S. J., Herrero, M., Carlson, K. M., Jonell, M., Troell, M., DeClerck, F., Gordon, L. J., Zurayk, R., Scarborough, P., Rayner, M., Loken, B., Fanzo, J., … Willett, W. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. In Nature (Vol. 562, Issue 7728, pp. 519–525). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  246. Springmann, M., Dingenen, R. V., Vandyck, T., Latka, C., Witzke, P., & Leip, A. (2023). The global and regional air quality impacts of dietary change. Nature Communications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41789-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  247. Sverdrup, H., Koca, D., & Ragnarsdottir, K. V. (2014). Investigating the sustainability of the global silver supply, reserves, stocks in society and market price using different approaches. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 83, pp. 121–140). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  248. The Silver Institute and Metal Focus. (2023). World silver survey 2023 [Report]. The Silver Institute. www.silverinstitute.org Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  249. Tost, M., Murguia, D., Hitch, M., Lutter, S., Luckeneder, S., Feiel, S., & Moser, P. (2020). Ecosystem services costs of metal mining and pressures on biomes. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.11.013 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  250. UN. (2022). World population prospects 2022 [Report]. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. https://population.un.org/wpp/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  251. UNEP. (2024). Global resources outlook 2024: Bend the trend – pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spikes [Report]. International Resource Panel. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/44901 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  252. United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. In Development and Cooperation (Vol. 42, p. 4). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  253. United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). Emission gap report 2022: The closing window—Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies [Report]. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  254. van Westen, R. M., Kliphuis, M., & Dijkstra, H. A. (2024). Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course. In Science advances (Vol. 10, Issue 6, p. eadk1189). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  255. Victoria, M., Haegel, N., Peters, I. M., Sinton, R., Jäger-Waldau, A., del Cañizo, C., Breyer, C., Stocks, M., Blakers, A., Kaizuka, I., Komoto, K., & Smets, A. (2021). Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future. In Joule (Vol. 5, Issue 5, pp. 1041–1056). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  256. Vita, G., Hertwich, E. G., Stadler, K., & Wood, R. (2019). Connecting global emissions to fundamental human needs and their satisfaction. In Environmental Research Letters (Vol. 14, Issue 1). www.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae6e0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  257. Vita, G., Lundström, J. R., Hertwich, E. G., Quist, J., Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., & Wood, R. (2019). The environmental impact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in europe: Connecting local sustainability visions to global consequences. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 164). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  258. Waldinger, R., & Schulz, M. (2023). The good life and how to live it. Vermilion. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  259. Wang, P., Li, W., & Kara, S. (2018). Dynamic life cycle quantification of metallic elements and their circularity, efficiency, and leakages. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 174, pp. 1492–1502). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  260. Wiedenhofer, D., Wieland, H., Leipold, S., Aoki-Suzuki, C., Watari, T., Aguilar-Hernandez, G. A., Graf, S., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Zanon-Zotin, M., Kaufmann, L., Fortes, P., Haas, W. & Streeck, J. (2025). The Circular Economy and Climate Change: The State of National and Global Evidence on Mitigation Potential. Annual Review of Environment and Resources (Vol. 50). doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-111523-102441 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  261. Wiedmann, N., & Desing, H. (2024). Repurposing natural gas pipelines: A path to decarbonizing the eu’s heating sector? https://circeular.org/repurposing-natural-gas-pipelines-a-path-to-decarbonizing-the-eus-heating-sector/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  262. Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., Jonell, M., Clark, M., Gordon, L. J., Fanzo, J., Hawkes, C., Zurayk, R., Rivera, J. A., De Vries, W., Majele Sibanda, L., … Murray, C. J. L. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. In The Lancet (Vol. 393, Issue 10170, pp. 447–492). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  263. Wunderling, N., Winkelmann, R., Rockström, J., Loriani, S., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Ritchie, P. D. L., Sakschewski, B., & Donges, J. F. (2022). Global warming overshoots increase risks of climate tipping cascades in a network model. In Nature Climate Change (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 75–82). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01545-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  264. Zhang, Y., Kim, M., Wang, L., Verlinden, P., & Hallam, B. (2021). Design considerations for multi-terawatt scale manufacturing of existing and future photovoltaic technologies: Challenges and opportunities related to silver, indium and bismuth consumption. In Energy and Environmental Science (Vol. 14, Issue 11, pp. 5587–5610). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-241
  265. Circular Cities Declaration. (2020). Current Signatories. https://circularcitiesdeclaration.eu/current-signatories Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  266. City of Espoo. (2021). Carbon-neutral circular economy. https://www.espoo.fi/en/sustainable-development/carbon-neutral-circular-economy#1-circular-economy-solutions-during-the-construction-life-cycle--48441 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  267. City of Gothenburg. (2021). Environment and Climate Programme for the City of Gothenburg 2021–2030. https://goteborg.se/wps/portal/enhetssida/miljo-och-klimat-goteborg/miljo-och-klimatprogrammet Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  268. City of Leuven. (2020). Circular Leuven. https://roadmap-en.leuven2030.be/pdf/Circular_Leuven.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  269. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Cities and the circular economy. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/cities-and-the-circular-economy-deep-dive Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  270. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2024). Building Prosperity: Unlocking the potential of a nature-positive, circular economy for Europe. https://content.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/m/62e7613596a2d12f/original/Building-Prosperity-July-2024.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  271. European Commission. (2022). Circular cities and regions initiative: Introduction to the initiative. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/download/0ba0e655-3932-413b-a54d-1d13d7936630_en?filename=ec_rtd_circular-cities-regions-initiative-report-initiative-summary.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  272. Gravagnuolo, A., Angrisano, M., & Fusco Girard, L. (2019). Circular Economy Strategies in Eight Historic Port Cities: Criteria and Indicators Towards a Circular City Assessment Framework. Sustainability, 11(13), 3512. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133512 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  273. Kisser, J., & Wirth, M. (2021). The Fabrics of a Circular City. In L. Liu & S. Ramakrishna (Eds.), An Introduction to Circular Economy (pp. 55–75). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8510-4_4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  274. Lakatos, E. S., Yong, G., Szilagyi, A., Clinci, D. S., Georgescu, L., Iticescu, C., & Cioca, L.-I. (2021). Conceptualizing Core Aspects on Circular Economy in Cities. Sustainability, 13(14), 7549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147549 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  275. Municipality of Murcia. (2021). Murcia’s Circular Economy Strategy. https://www.estrategiamurcia.es/upload/2021/11/Murcia-s-Circular-Economy-Strategy.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  276. OECD. (2025). The Circular Economy in Cities and Regions of the European Union. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e09c21e2-en Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  277. Paiho, S., Mäki, E., Wessberg, N., Paavola, M., Tuominen, P., Antikainen, M., Heikkilä, J., Rozado, C. A., & Jung, N. (2020). Towards circular cities—Conceptualizing core aspects. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102143 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  278. Petit-Boix, A., & Leipold, S. (2018). Circular economy in cities: Reviewing how environmental research aligns with local practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1270–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.281 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  279. Prague Innovation Institute. (2021). Circular Prague 2030. https://klima.praha.eu/data/Dokumenty/circular-prague-2030-eng.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  280. Wang, N., Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, J., Chen, H., & Li, H. (2018). Evaluation of Urban circular economy development: An empirical research of 40 cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 876–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.089 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-252
  281. Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: A model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28, 234–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0215 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  282. Allaoui, H., Guo, Y., Choudhary, A., & Bloemhof, J. (2018). Sustainable agro-food supply chain design using two-stage hybrid multi-objective decision-making approach. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.10.012 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  283. Alliance to Zero. (2025). Alliance to Zero. https://alliancetozero.com/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  284. Almandoz, J., Lee, Y.-T., & Ribera, A. (2018). Unleashing the Power of Purpose: 5 Steps to Transform Your Business. IESE Insight, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.15581/002.ART-3171 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  285. Arekrans, J., Ritzén, S., & Laurenti, R. (2023). The role of radical innovation in circular strategy deployment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(3), 1085–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3108 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  286. AshaRani, P. V., Lai, D., Koh, J., & Subramaniam, M. (2022). Purpose in Life in Older Adults: A Systematic Review on Conceptualization, Measures, and Determinants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105860 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  287. Bailey, C., & Madden, A. (2016). What Makes work meaningful—Or meaningless. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  288. Battilana, J., Kimsey, M., Pache, A.-C., & Sengul, M. (2019). The dual-purpose playbook. Harvard Business Review, 2019(March-April), 124–133. Scopus®. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  289. Battilana, J., Obloj, T., Pache, A.-C., & Sengul, M. (2022). Beyond Shareholder Value Maximization: Accounting for Financial/Social Trade-Offs in Dual-Purpose Companies. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0386 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  290. Baumgartner, R. J. (2014). Managing Corporate Sustainability and CSR: A Conceptual Framework Combining Values, Strategies and Instruments Contributing to Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1336 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  291. Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A., Foote, N., Fredberg, T., & Norrgren, F. (2011). Higher Ambition: How Great Leaders Create Economic and Social Value. Harvard Business Review Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/chalmers/detail.action?docID=5181897 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  292. Besharov, M., & Mitzinneck, B. (2023). The Multiple Facets of Corporate Purpose: An Analytical Typology. Strategy Science, 8(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0186 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  293. Binns, A., O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. (2022). Corporate explorer: How corporations beat startups at the innovation game. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  294. Birkinshaw, J., Juul Foss, N., & Lindenberg, S. (2014). Combining purpose with profits. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 49–56. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  295. Björck, A., Blaese, R., & Schoch, D. (2023). A Process Perspective On Purpose: A Systematic Literature Review On Purpose-Driven Transformation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2023(1), 17110. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.17110abstract Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  296. Bleicher, K. (1991). Organisation: Strategien—Strukturen—Kulturen. Gabler Verlag. https://books.google.se/books?id=tziKGAAACAAJ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  297. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  298. Brosch, N. (2023). Corporate purpose: From a ‘Tower of Babel’ phenomenon towards construct clarity. Journal of Business Economics, 93(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01137-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  299. Bushe, G. (2021). The Generative Change Model: Creating the Agile Organization While Dealing With a Complex Problem. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(4), 530–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863211038119 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  300. Bushe, G., & Lewis, S. (2023). Three change strategies in organization development: Data-based, high engagement and generative. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2022-0229 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  301. Campbell, A., & Yeung, S. (1991). Creating a sense of mission. Long Range Planning, 24(4), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(91)90002-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  302. Cardona, P., & Rey, C. (2022). Management by Missions: Connecting People to Strategy through Purpose (Open Access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83780-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  303. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  304. Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  305. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. In Journal of Engineering and Technology Management—J ENG TECHNOL MANAGE (Vol. 21). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  306. Chesbrough, H., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Open Social Innovation* (pp. 169–188). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0009 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  307. Clariant. (2021). Integrated Report 2021. https://reports.clariant.com/2021/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  308. Coca-Cola Company. (2025). About Us. https://www.coca-colacompany.com/about-us Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  309. Collins, H., & Saliba, C. (2020). Connecting people to purpose builds a sustainable business model at Bark House. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21992 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  310. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1991). Organizational Vision and Visionary Organizations. California Management Review, 34(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166682 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  311. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1996). Building your company’s vision. Harvard Business Review, v74(n5). Gale Business: Insights. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=8b610120-f8e8-3405-90d4-fec687b3deba Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  312. Crilly, D., Hansen, M., & Zollo, M. (2015). The Grammar of Decoupling: A Cognitive-Linguistic Perspective on Firms’ Sustainability Claims and Stakeholders’ Interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0171 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  313. Dhanesh, G. (2020). Who cares about organizational purpose and corporate social responsibility, and how can organizations adapt? A hypermodern perspective. Business Horizons, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  314. Diaz, A., Reyes, T., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2022). Implementing circular economy strategies during product development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184, 106344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106344 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  315. Durand, R., & Huynh, C.-W. (2024). Corporate purpose research: Streams and promises. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 2(3–4), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311241283390 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  316. Elgendy, R., Morad, A., Elmongui, H., Khalafallah, A., & Abougabal, M. (2017). Role-task conditional-purpose policy model for privacy preserving data publishing. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.05.029 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  317. Fitzsimmons, A. B., Qin, Y. S., & Heffron, E. R. (2022). Purpose vs mission vs vision: Persuasive appeals and components in corporate statements. Journal of Communication Management, 26(2), 207–219. Scopus®. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-09-2021-0108 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  318. Fleischer, H. (2021). Corporate Purpose: A Management Concept and its Implications for Company Law. In European Company and Financial Law Review (Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 161–189). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  319. Fontán, C., Alloza, A., & Rey, C. (2019). (Re)Discovering Organizational Purpose (pp. 107–118). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17674-7_9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  320. Gartenberg, C. (2021). Purpose-driven companies and sustainability. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3786823 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  321. Gartenberg, C., Prat, A., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate purpose and financial performance. In ORGANIZATION SCIENCE (Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp. 1–18). INFORMS. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1230 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  322. Gartenberg, C., & Serafeim, G. (2022). Corporate Purpose in Public and Private Firms. Management Science, 69(9), 5087–5111. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4618 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  323. Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018). Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  324. George, G., Haas, M. R., McGahan, A. M., Schillebeeckx, S. J. D., & Tracey, P. (2023). Purpose in the For-Profit Firm: A Review and Framework for Management Research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1841–1869. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006450 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  325. George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  326. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1988). Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490388 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  327. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1994). Linking Organizational Context and Managerial Action: The Dimensions of Quality of Management. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 91–112. JSTOR. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  328. Glissman, S., & Sanz, J. L. C. (2009). A comparative review of business architecture. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14675074 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  329. Global Impact Coalition. (2025). https://globalimpactcoalition.com/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  330. Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., Sisodia, R., & Nordfält, J. (2017). Enhancing Customer Engagement Through Consciousness. The Future of Retailing, 93(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  331. Gulati, R. (2022). Deep Purpose: The Heart and Soul of High-performance Companies. Harper Business. https://books.google.se/books?id=GOxzzgEACAAJ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  332. Gulati, R., & Wohlgezogen, F. (2023). Can Purpose Foster Stakeholder Trust in Corporations? Strategy Science, 8(2), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0196 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  333. Harrison, J. S., Phillips, R. A., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). On the 2019 Business Roundtable “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation.” In Journal of Management (Vol. 46, Issue 7, pp. 1223–1237). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  334. Henderson, R. (2021a). Changing the purpose of the corporation to rebalance capitalism. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(4), 838–850. Business Source Ultimate. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grab034 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  335. Henderson, R. (2021b). Innovation in the 21st Century: Architectural Change, Purpose, and the Challenges of Our Time. Management Science, 67(9), 5479–5488. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3746 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  336. Holden, P. A. (1997). Success through service. Management Decision, 35(9), 677–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749710186513 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  337. Hollander, M., van der Meer, J., & van der Velden, M. (2017). The role of system change in the transition to a circular economy. Sustainability, 9(8), 1345. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  338. Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., George, G., & Nichols, C. V. (2014). Organizations with Purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.4005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  339. Hsieh, N., Meyer, M., Rodin, D., & Klooster, J. (2018). The Social Purpose of Corporations. Journal of the British Academy, 6, 49–73. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/006s1.049 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  340. Hsu, C. J. (2017). Selling products by selling brand purpose. Journal of Brand Strategy. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  341. Hurth, V., Ebert, C., & Prabhu, J. (2018). Organisational Purpose: The Construct and its Antecedents and Consequences. Cambridge Judge Business School Working Paper No. 02/2018. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  342. Imec (2023). Imec explores disruptive ideas in health tech in collaboration with Johnson & Johnson Innovation. https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/imec-explores-disruptive-ideas-health-tech-collaboration-johnson-johnson-innovation?utm_source=chatgpt.com Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  343. Ingenhoff, D., & Fuhrer, T. (2010). Positioning and differentiation by using brand personality attributes. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011016859 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  344. Jasinenko, A., & Steuber, J. (2023). Perceived Organizational Purpose: Systematic Literature Review, Construct Definition, Measurement and Potential Employee Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 60(6), 1415–1447. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12852 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  345. Johnson & Johnson (2025). Our Credo. https://www.jnj.com/our-credo Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  346. Kershaw, D., & Schuster, E. (2021). The Purposive Transformation of Corporate Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 69(3), 478–538. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avac004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  347. Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  348. Knowles, J., Tom Hunsaker, B., Grove, H., & James, A. (2022). What Is the Purpose of Your Purpose? Harvard Business Review, 2022-March-April. Scopus®. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=89f602ec-e42f-3b41-bd50-62a1f08c73d8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  349. Kuhlmann, M., Bening, C. R., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2023). How incumbents realize disruptive circular innovation ‐ Overcoming the innovator’s dilemma for a circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(3), 1106–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3109 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  350. Lacy, P., & Rutqvist, J. (2015). Waste to wealth: The circular economy advantage (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  351. Lankoski, L., & Smith, N. C. (2018). Alternative Objective Functions for Firms. Organization & Environment, 31(3), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617722883 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  352. Lleó, Á., Prat, M., Rey, C., & Perez, F. (2020). Purpose Implementation: Conceptualization and Measurement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3630416 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  353. Logitech. (2025a). About Logitech – Our Story and Focus. https://www.logitech.com/en-us/about.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  354. Logitech. (2025b). Sustainability. https://www.logitech.com/en-us/planet-and-people/sustainability Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  355. Logitech Impact Report. (2024). Logitech. https://impactreport.logitech.com/#page=3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  356. Malnight, T. W., Buche, I., & Dhanaraj, C. (2019). Put Purpose at the CORE of Your Strategy. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 97(5), 70–79. Social Sciences Citation Index. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  357. Margolis, S. L., & Hansen, C. D. (2002). A Model for Organizational Identity: Exploring the Path to Sustainability during Change. Human Resource Development Review, 1(3), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484302013002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  358. Marques, J. F. (2019). Flawed organizational purpose? Changing the narrative in management education and practice. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 33(5), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-12-2018-0168 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  359. Mayer, C. (2021). The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 887–901. Scopus®. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12660 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  360. Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems (1st ed.). Chelsea Green Publishing Co. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  361. Mirvis, P., Googins, B., & Kinnicutt, S. (2010). Vision, mission, values. Organizational Dynamics – ORGAN DYN, 39, 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.07.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  362. Modgil, S., Singh, R. K., & Hannibal, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence for supply chain resilience: Learning from Covid-19. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(4), 1246–1268. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0094 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  363. Moktadir, Md. A., Kumar, A., Ali, S. M., Paul, S. K., Sultana, R., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Critical success factors for a circular economy: Implications for business strategy and the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3611–3635. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2600 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  364. Morrison, A. D., & Mota, R. (2023). A Theory of Organizational Purpose. Academy of Management Review, 48(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0307 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  365. Moser, S. (2016). Reflections on Climate Change Communication Research and Practice in the Second Decade of the 21 st Century: What More Is There to Say? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.403 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  366. Narbel, F., & Muff, K. (2017). Should the Evolution of Stakeholder Theory Be Discontinued Given Its Limitations? Theoretical Economics Letters, 07, 1357–1381. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2017.75092 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  367. O’brien, D., Main, A., Kounkel, S., & R. Stephan, A. (2019). Purpose is everything. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/marketing-and-sales-operations/global-marketing-trends/2020/purpose-driven-companies.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  368. Ocasio, W., Kraatz, M., & Chandler, D. (2023). Making Sense of Corporate Purpose. Strategy Science, 8(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0054 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  369. O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  370. Paine, L., & Freeman, E. (2024, September 19). 181 CEOs pledged to lead companies for ‘all stakeholders’ in 2019. Did it make a difference? | Institute for Business in Global Society. Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/bigs/181ceos-pledged-for-stakeholder-capitalism-in-2019-did-it-make-a-difference Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  371. Parida, V., Sjödin, D., & Reim, W. (2019). Reviewing Literature on Digitalization, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Industry: Past Achievements and Future Promises. Sustainability, 11(2), 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020391 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  372. Pheifer, A. G. (2017). Barriers and enablers to circular business models. White Paper. Brielle. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  373. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). CREATING SHARED VALUE. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  374. Pregmark, J. E., & Beer, M. (2025). The Silent Killers of Strategic Change in a VUCA World. Academy of Management Perspectives, amp.2024.0093. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2024.0093 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  375. Pregmark, J. E., Fredberg, T., Berggren, R., & Frössevi, B. (2023). Learning From Collaborative Action Research in Three Organizations: How Purpose Activates Change Agency. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 59(4), 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231195909 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  376. Rerup, C., Gioia, D., & Corley, K. (2022). Identity Transitions via Subtle Adaptive Sensemaking: The Empirical Pursuit of the Intangible. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0212 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  377. Rey, C., Prat, M., & Sotok, P. (2019). Purpose-driven Organizations Management Ideas for a Better World: Management Ideas for a Better World. (Open Acces). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17674-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  378. Rodríguez Víla, O., Bharadwaj, S., & Knowles, J. (2017). Competing on social purpose: Interaction. Harvard Business Review, 95(6), 17–17. Business Source Ultimate. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  379. Roos Lindgreen, E., Opferkuch, K., Walker, A. M., Salomone, R., Reyes, T., Raggi, A., Simboli, A., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Caeiro, S. (2022). Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1414–1438. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2962 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  380. Rosenman, M. A., & Gero, J. S. (1999). Purpose and function in a collaborative CAD environment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 64(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00061-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  381. Saionz A. (2023). JLABS' Global Head on Open Innovation & Writing Biotech Success Stories. Pharma Boardroom. https://pharmaboardroom.com/articles/jlabs-global-head-on-open-innovation-writing-biotech-success-stories/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  382. Saleem, F., & Iglesias, O. (2016). Mapping the domain of the fragmented field of internal branding. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-11-2014-0751 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  383. Salem Khalifa, A. (2012). Mission, purpose, and ambition: Redefining the mission statement. Journal of Strategy and Management, 5(3), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251211247553 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  384. Santa‐Maria, T., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2022). How do incumbent firms innovate their business models for the circular economy? Identifying micro‐foundations of dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1308–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2956 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  385. Schmitt, A., Raisch, S., & Volberda, H. W. (2018). Strategic Renewal: Past Research, Theoretical Tensions and Future Challenges. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12117 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  386. Selznick, P. (1984). Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. University of California Press. https://books.google.se/books?id=baExQc8ARDEC Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  387. Senge, P. M. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world (1st ed.). Doubleday. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  388. Shee, P., & Abratt, R. (1989). A new approach to the corporate image management process. Journal of Marketing Management, 5, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1989.9964088 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  389. Shuck, B., & Rose, K. (2013). Reframing Employee Engagement Within the Context of Meaning and Purpose Implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422313503235 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  390. Silver, H. (2018). Sociology: Moral dialogues and normative change. The Social Science Journal, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.02.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  391. Simpson, M., Taylor, N., & Barker, K. (2004). Environmental responsibility in SMEs: Does it deliver competitive advantage? Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(3), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.398 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  392. Steingard, D., & Clark, W. (2016). The Benefit Corporation as an Exemplar of Integrative Corporate Purpose. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 35(1), 73–101. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  393. Steller, N., & Björck, A. (2024). Extending Strategifying by Cultural Coupling: Purposefying Led by Chief Purpose Officers. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2024(1), 13671. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.13671abstract Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  394. Steller, N., & Björck, A. (2025). Dynamic Strategifying: How do Chief Purpose Officers make purpose strategic and strategy purposeful? Long Range Planning, 58(3), 102532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102532 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  395. Steller, N., & Moellering, G. (2024). Beyond the Hype: Organizational Challenges and Implications of the Purpose Approach. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2024(1), 20327. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.272bp Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  396. Stewart, H., & Gapp, R. (2014). Achieving Effective Sustainable Management: A Small‐Medium Enterprise Case Study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1305 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  397. Takacs, F., Brunner, D., & Frankenberger, K. (2022). Barriers to a circular economy in small- and medium-sized enterprises and their integration in a sustainable strategic management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 132227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132227 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  398. Thakor, A., & Quinn, R. (2013). The Economics of Higher Purpose. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2362454 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  399. Tushman, M. L., Volberda, H. W., Di Minin, A., Bushe, G. R., Björck, A., Pregmark, J. E., Gionfriddo, G., & Fredberg, T. (2024). Purpose-Driven Strategic Renewal, Open Innovation & Generative Change: Models, Governance, Practice. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2024(1), 12103. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.12103symposium Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  400. van Ingen, R., Peters, P., De Ruiter, M., & Robben, H. (2021). Exploring the Meaning of Organizational Purpose at a New Dawn: The Development of a Conceptual Model Through Expert Interviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 675543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675543 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  401. Volberda, H., Vishwananthan, P., Heij, K., & Sidhu, J. (2022). De Winst van Purpose (1st ed.). Mediawerf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  402. von Ahsen, A., & Gauch, K. (2022). Opportunities and Challenges of Purpose-Led Companies: An Empirical Study Through Expert Interviews. Corporate Reputation Review, 25(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00122-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  403. Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview and New Research Directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.5001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-262
  404. Abbate, S., Centobelli, P., & Cerchione, R. (2023a). From Fast to Slow: An Exploratory Analysis of Circular Business Models in the Italian Apparel Industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 260, 108824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108824 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  405. Abbate, S., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Nadeem, S. P., & Riccio, E. (2023b). Sustainability trends and gaps in the textile, apparel and fashion industries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 2837–2864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02887-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  406. Areias, S. A. (2024). Striving for a Rapid Transition: How Companies are Approaching Integrating Respect for Human Rights in Their Climate Action. Business and Human Rights Journal, 9(2), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2024.17 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  407. Atanasovska, I., Choudhary, S., Koh, L., Ketikidis, P. H., & Solomon, A. (2022). Research gaps and future directions on social value stemming from circular economy practices in agri-food industrial parks: Insights from a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131753 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  408. Center for International Environmental Law CIEL. (2023, March 1). Beyond Recycling: Reckoning with Plastics in a Circular Economy. Center for International Environmental Law. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://www.ciel.org/reports/circular-economy-analysis/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  409. Chrysler, J., Jaeger, C., & Phan, T. (2024). Towards a Sustainable Future: Recommendations for a just transition in waste management and circular economy in the ASEAN region (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Ed.). https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz2024-en-just-transition-report.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  410. Gil-Pérez, D., & Vilches, A. (2023). Cómo avanzar en la necesaria Transición a la Sostenibilidad. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 29. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320230027 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  411. Joas, H. (2012). Die Sakralität der Person: Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte (3rd ed.). Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  412. Kirchschlaeger, P. G. (2012). Evolution of the International Environment Law and Position of Child from a Philosophical Perspective. In K. Boesch (Ed.), Changement Climatique: Impacts sur les enfants et leurs droits (pp. 73–87). Institut international des Droits de l’Enfant. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  413. Kirchschlaeger, P. G. (2013). Wie können Menschenrechte begründet werden? Ein für religiöse und säkulare Menschenrechtskonzeptionen anschlussfähiger Ansatz. Religionsrecht im Dialog: Vol. 15. LIT. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  414. Kirchschlaeger, P. G. (2016). How can we justify human rights? International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, 4(4), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRCS.2016.10001930 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  415. Kirchschlaeger, P. G. (2023). Klimagerechtigkeit und Menschenrechte. In M. Wasmaier-Sailer & M. Durst (Eds.), Theologische Berichte: Vol. 42. Schöpfung und Ökologie (pp. 175–202). Herder. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  416. Kuegerl, M.‑T., & Tost, M. (2022). Verantwortungsvolle Beschaffung im Bereich der erneuerbaren Energien – Realität oder noch ein weiter Weg? BHM Berg- Und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte, 167(4), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-022-01209-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  417. Lembacher, Y., Marsden, J., & Schwerdtner, A. ‑S. V. (2022, June 2). Thinking beyond borders to achieve social justice in a global circular economy – Insights – Circle Economy. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://www.circle-economy.com/resources/thinking-beyond-borders-to-achieve-social-justice-in-a-global-circular-economy Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  418. Mies, A., & Gold, S. (2021). Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  419. Millward-Hopkins, J. (2024). The Social Implications of Circular Clothing Economies in the Global North. Sustainability, 16(16), 7094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167094 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  420. Mulvaney, D. (2024). Governing solar supply chains for socio-ecological justice. In S. Sareen & A. Martin (Eds.), Geographies of Solar Energy Transitions: Conflicts, controversies and cognate aspects (pp. 125–136). UCL Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  421. Musariri, L., & Moyer, E. (2022). Hunting Treasure, Gathering Trash: Politics and Precarity in the Plastic Recycling Industry. Etnofoor, 34(2), 49–66. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  422. Orellana, M. (2021). The stages of the plastics cycle and their impacts on human rights. (United Nations, Ed.; A/76/207). Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://undocs.org/A/76/207 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  423. Rocasolano, M. M., & Berlanga, M. D. C. (2022). Piedras Angulares del derecho ambiental, el ecocidio y el derecho fundamental al medio ambiente para el desarrollo de la persona. Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza), 20(35), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.p83-109.2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  424. Sareen, S., & Martin, A. (Eds.). (2024). Geographies of Solar Energy Transitions: Conflicts, controversies and cognate aspects. UCL Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  425. Sehnem, S., Pandolfi, A., & Gomes, C. (2019). Is sustainability a driver of the circular economy? Social Responsibility Journal, 16(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2018-0146 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  426. Sevigné-Itoiz, E., Mwabonje, O., Panoutsou, C., & Woods, J. (2021). Life cycle assessment (LCA): Informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy? Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 379(2206), 20200352. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0352 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  427. Stockholm Environment Institute. (2019, November 15). Transformational change through a circular economy. In JSTOR. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep22978 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  428. Suarez-Visbal, L. J., Carreón, J. R., Corona, B., & Worrel, E. (2022). The Social Impacts of Circular Strategies in the Apparel Value Chain; a Comparative Study Between Three Countries. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3(2), 757–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00203-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  429. The Clube of Rome & Systemic. (2020). A System Change Compass: Implementing the European Green Deal in a time of recovery. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/a-system-change-compass-implementing-the-european-green-deal-in-a-time-of-recovery/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  430. Thompson, J. (2010). What is Intergenerational Justice? Future Justice, 5–20, 6. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  431. UN Environment Programme (Ed.). (2024). Global Resources Outlook: Bend the trend Pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spike. International Resource Panel. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://resourcepanel.org/reports/global-resources-outlook-2024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  432. UN News. (2021, October 8). Access to a healthy environment, declared a human right by UN Rights Council. UN News. Global Perspective Human Stories. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/10/1102582 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  433. United Nations Development Programme UNDP. (2023, April 24). What is circular economy and why does it matter? UNDP Climate Promise. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/what-is-circular-economy-and-how-it-helps-fight-climate-change Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  434. Upadhyay, A., Mukhuty, S., Kumar, V., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126130 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  435. Vallaeys, F. (2020). ¿Por qué la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial no es todavía transformadora? Una aclaración filosófica. Andamios, Revista De Investigación Social, 17(42), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v17i42.745 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  436. Vasil, A. (2020) How to clean up Ev’s dirty Battery Problem. Corporate Knights, 19(1), 26–31. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  437. Zanoletti, A., Bresolin, B. M., & Bontempi, E. (2024). Building a Circular Economy for Lithium: Addressing Global Challenges. Global Challenges, 8(12), 2400250. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202400250 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-286
  438. Banerjee, S. B. (2012). A climate for change? Critical reflections on the Durban United Nations Climate Change Conference. Organization Studies, 33(12), 1761–1786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612464609 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  439. Bocken, N. M. P., Niessen, L., & Short, S. W. (2022). The sufficiency-based circular economy—An analysis of 150 companies. Frontiers in Sustainability, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.899289 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  440. Buch-Hansen, H., & Koch, M. (2019). Degrowth through income and wealth caps? Ecological Economics, 160, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  441. Cassiers, I., & Maréchal, K. (2018). The economy in a post-growth era: What project and what philosophy? In I. Cassiers, K. Maréchal, & D. Méda (Eds.), Post-growth economics and society: Exploring the paths of a social and ecological transition (pp. 1–12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315145334 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  442. Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2022). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(2), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13187 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  443. Costanza, R. (2025, February 3). Towards an integrated system and consolidation [Conference presentation]. MERGE kick-off event: Measuring what matters – Economy that would improve wellbeing for all now and in the future, online. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  444. Dengler, C., & Lang, M. (2022). Commoning care: Feminist degrowth visions for a socio-ecological transformation. Feminist Economics, 28(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1942511 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  445. Ekins, P. (2000). Economic growth and environmental sustainability: The prospects for green growth. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  446. European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions: A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe (Document 52020DC0098). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0098 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  447. European Commission. (2023). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions: A Green Deal Industrial Plan for the net-zero age (Document 52023DC0062). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52023DC0062 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  448. Finnish Government. (2021). New directions: The strategic programme to promote a circular economy (Publications of the Finnish Government 2021:1). http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-383-658-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  449. Haapanen, L., & Tapio P. (2016). Economic growth as phenomenon, institution and ideology: A qualitative content analysis of the 21st century growth critique. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3492–3503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  450. Hagens, N. J. (2020). Economics for the future – Beyond the superorganism. Ecological Economics, 169, 106520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106520 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  451. Hankammer, S., Kleer, R., Mühl, L., & Euler, J. (2021). Principles for organizations striving for sustainable degrowth: Framework development and application to four B Corps. Journal of Cleaner Production, 300, 126818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126818 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  452. Heikkurinen, P. (2024). Degrowth: An experience on being finite (1st ed.). Mayfly Books. https://mayflybooks.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Degrowth_An_Experience_of_Being_Finite_ONLINE45-1.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  453. Heikkurinen, P., Ruuska, T., Wilén, K., & Ulvila, M. (2019). The Anthropocene exit: Reconciling discursive tensions on the new geological epoch. Ecological Economics, 164, 106369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106369 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  454. Hickel, J. (2021). The anti-colonial politics of degrowth. Political Geography, 88, 102404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102404 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  455. Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  456. Houtbeckers, E. (2022). Ekofeministinen kohtuutalous ja ekososiaaliset kriisit [Ecofeminist degrowth and ecosocial crises]. Poliittinen talous, 10(2), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.51810/pt.111959 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  457. International Resource Panel. (2024). Global resources outlook 2024: Bend the trend – Pathways to a liveable planet as resource use spikes. United Nations Environment Programme. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/44901 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  458. Jungell-Michelsson, J., & Heikkurinen, P. (2022). Sufficiency: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics, 195, 107380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107380 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  459. Kallis, g., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025). Post-growth: The science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(1), e62–e78. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  460. Khmara, Y., & Kronenberg, J. (2018). Degrowth in business: An oxymoron or a viable business model for sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.182 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  461. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 221–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  462. Kongshøj, K. (2023). Social policy in a future of degrowth? Challenges for decommodification, commoning and public support. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02255-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  463. Laurent, É. (2024). Sufficiency as a confluence for post-growth streams – Report on the integrated analysis of the different schools of thought. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13682536 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  464. Lehmann, C., Delbard, O., & Lange, S. (2022). Green growth, a-growth or degrowth? Investigating the attitudes of environmental protection specialists at the German Environment Agency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 336, 130306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130306 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  465. Leinonen, H., & Lappalainen, R. (2023). Kiertotalous ponnahduslautana kohtuutalouteen: Suosituksia kestävään organisoitumiseen [A circular economy as a springboard to degrowth: Recommendations for sustainable organizing]. Wisdom Letters, 2023(2). https://doi.org/10.17011/wl/9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  466. Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  467. Nesterova, I. (2020). Degrowth business framework: Implications for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121382 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  468. Parrique, T. (2019). The political economy of degrowth [Doctoral dissertation, Université Clermont Auvergne, Stockholm University]. Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement International. https://theses.hal.science/tel-02499463 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  469. Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked – Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. The European Environmental Bureau. eeb.org/decoupling-debunked Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  470. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  471. Pla-Julián, I., & Guevara, S. (2019). Is circular economy the key to transitioning towards sustainable development? Challenges from the perspective of care ethics. Futures, 105, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.09.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  472. Princen, T. (2003). Principles for sustainability: From cooperation and efficiency to sufficiency. Global Environmental Politics, 3(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003763336374 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  473. Raworth, K. (2017). A doughnut for the anthropocene: Humanity's compass in the 21st century. The Lancet Planetary Health, 1(2), e48–e49. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196%2817%2930028-1/fulltext Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  474. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Drüke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., von Bloh, W., Feulner, G., Fiedler, S., Gerten, D., Gleeson, T., Hofmann, M., Huiskamp, W., Kummu, M., Mohan, C., Nogués-Bravo, D., Petri, S., Porkka, M., Rahmstorf, S., Schaphoff, S., Thonicke, K., Tobian, A., Virkki, V., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Weber, L., & Rockström, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37), eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  475. Rising, J. (2023). Loss and damage today: How climate change is impacting output and capital. Gerard J. Mangone Climate Change Science and Policy Hub Report. https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.udel.edu/dist/5/11885/files/2023/11/Report-Loss_and_Damage_Today.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  476. Scheidel, A., & Schaffartzik, A. (2019). A socio-metabolic perspective on environmental justice and degrowth movements. Ecological Economics, 161, 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  477. Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  478. Stoknes, P. E., & Rockström, J. (2018). Redefining green growth within planetary boundaries. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.030 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  479. Vadén, T., Lähde, V., Majava, A., Järvensivu, P., Toivanen, T., & Eronen, J. T. (2020a). Raising the bar: On the type, size and timeline of a ‘successful’ decoupling. Environmental Politics, 30(3), 462–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1783951 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  480. Vadén, T., Lähde, V., Majava, A., Järvensivu, P., Toivanen, T., Hakala, E., & Eronen, J. T. (2020b). Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  481. Vadén, T., Lähde, V., Majava, A., Toivanen, T., Eronen, J. T., & Järvensivu, P. (2019). Onnistunut irtikytkentä Suomessa? [Successful decoupling in Finland?]. Alue ja Ympäristö, 48(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.76338 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  482. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2011). Environment versus growth – A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth”. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 881–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.035 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  483. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Kallis, G. (2012). Growth, a-growth or degrowth to stay within planetary boundaries? Journal of Economic Issues, 46(4), 909–920. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  484. Wright, C., Nyberg, D., Rickards, L., & Freund, J. (2018). Organizing in the Anthropocene. Organization, 25(4), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418779649 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  485. Young, W., & Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.510 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-294
  486. Alvarez-Risco, A., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., & Rosen, M.A. (2022a). Introduction to the Circular Economy. In A. Alvarez-Risco, M.A. Rosen, & S. Del-Aguila-Arcentales (Eds.), Towards a Circular Economy (pp. 3-23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94293-9_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  487. Alvarez-Risco, A., Rosen, M.A., & Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S. (2022b). Towards a Circular Economy. Cham, Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94293-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  488. Amir, S., Salehi, N., Roci, M., Sweet, S., & Rashid, A. (2023). Towards circular economy: A guiding framework for circular supply chain implementation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 2684–2701. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3264 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  489. Angelis, R. de, Howard, M., & Miemczyk, J. (2018). Supply chain management and the circular economy: towards the circular supply chain. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  490. Babbitt, C.W., Gaustad, G., Fisher, A., Chen, W.-Q., & Liu, G. (2018). Closing the loop on circular economy research: From theory to practice and back again, Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 135, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.012 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  491. Bachrach, D.G., Bendoly, E., Beu Ammeter, D., Blackburn, R., Brown, K.G., Burke, G., Callahan, T., Chen, K.Y., Day, V.H., Ellstrand, A.E., Erekson, O.H., Gomez, J.A., Greenlee, T., Handfield, R., Loudder, M.L., Malhotra, M., Petroni, K.R., Sevilla, A., Shafer, S., Shih, M., & Voss, D. (2017). On Academic Rankings, Unacceptable Methods, and the Social Obligations of Business Schools. Decision Sciences, 48(3), 561–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12274 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  492. Bansal, S., Guide, V.D.R., & Naumov, S. (2024). Closed‐loop supply chains with product remanufacturing: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Operations Management, 70(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1298 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  493. Baxter, W., Aurisicchio, M., & Childs, P. (2017). Contaminated Interaction: Another Barrier to Circular Material Flows. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12612 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  494. Beske-Janssen, P., Johnson, M.P., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). 20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management – what has been achieved?. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), 664–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0216 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  495. Biancolin, M., Capoani, L., & Rotaris, L. (2023). Reverse logistics and circular economy: A literature review. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, (94), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.48295/ET.2023.94.7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  496. Bimpizas-Pinis, M., Bozhinovska, E., Genovese, A., Lowe, B., Pansera, M., Alberich, J.P., & Ramezankhani, M.J. (2021). Is efficiency enough for circular economy?. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 167, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105399 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  497. Blomsma, F., & Brennan, G. (2017). The Emergence of Circular Economy: A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  498. Bocken, N., Pinkse, J., Darnall, N., & Ritala, P. (2023). Between Circular Paralysis and Utopia: Organizational Transformations towards the Circular Economy. Organization & Environment, 36(2), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221148298 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  499. Boulding, K.E. (1966). The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In H. Jarrett (Eds.), Environmental quality in a growing economy (pp. 3-14). Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315064147 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  500. Brandão, M., Lazarevic, D., & Finnveden, G. (2020). Handbook of the circular economy. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  501. Bressanelli, G., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2019). Challenges in supply chain redesign for the Circular Economy: a literature review and a multiple case study. International Journal of Production Research, 57(23), 7395–7422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1542176 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  502. Calisto Friant, M., Vermeulen, W.J., & Salomone, R. (2021). Analysing European Union circular economy policies: words versus actions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  503. Calzolari, T., Bimpizas-Pinis, M., Genovese, A., & Brint, A. (2023). Understanding the relationship between institutional pressures, supply chain integration and the adoption of circular economy practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139686 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  504. Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., & Pettersen, I.N. (2018). Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 10(8), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082758 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  505. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., Del Vecchio, P., & Urbinati, A. (2020). Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1734–1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  506. Chrispim, M.C., Mattsson, M., & Ulvenblad, P. (2023). The underrepresented key elements of Circular Economy: A critical review of assessment tools and a guide for action. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  507. Corley, K.G., & Gioia, D.A. (2004). Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131471 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  508. Corvellec, H., Stowell, A.F., & Johansson, N. (2022). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(2), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13187 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  509. Cullen, J.M. (2017). Circular Economy: Theoretical Benchmark or Perpetual Motion Machine?. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 483–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12599 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  510. Demestichas, K., & Daskalakis, E. (2020). Information and Communication Technology Solutions for the Circular Economy. Sustainability, 12(18), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187272 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  511. Desing, H., Brunner, D., Takacs, F., Nahrath, S., Frankenberger, K., & Hischier, R. (2020). A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104673 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  512. Dieckmann, E., Sheldrick, L., Tennant, M., Myers, R., & Cheeseman, C. (2020). Analysis of Barriers to Transitioning from a Linear to a Circular Economy for End of Life Materials: A Case Study for Waste Feathers. Sustainability, 12(5), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051725 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  513. Do, Q., Mishra, N., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Ramudhin, A. (2022). An extended institutional theory perspective on the adoption of circular economy practices: Insights from the seafood industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 247, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108400 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  514. Dopfer, K., Foster, J., & Potts, J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  515. Dzhengiz, T., Miller, E.M., Ovaska, J.-P., & Patala, S. (2023). Unpacking the circular economy: A problematizing review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(2), 270–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12329 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  516. Erol, I., Murat Ar, I., Peker, I., & Searcy, C. (2022). Alleviating the Impact of the Barriers to Circular Economy Adoption Through Blockchain: An Investigation Using an Integrated MCDM-based QFD With Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 165, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.107962 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  517. Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  518. Gao, J.Q., Li, D., Qiao, G.H., Jia, Q.R., Li, S.R., & Gao, H.L. (2024). Circular economy strategies in supply chains, enhancing resource efficiency and sustainable development goals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 31(6), 8751–8767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31551-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  519. Gedam, V.V., Raut, R.D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Tanksale, A.N., & Narkhede, B.E. (2021). Circular economy practices in a developing economy: Barriers to be defeated. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127670 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  520. Giampietro, M., & Funtowicz, S.O. (2020). From elite folk science to the policy legend of the circular economy. Environmental Science & Policy, 109, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.012 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  521. Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018). A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 278–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  522. Greer, R., von Wirth, T., & Loorbach, D. (2021). The Waste-Resource Paradox: Practical dilemmas and societal implications in the transition to a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126831 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  523. Gupta, H., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Barriers and overcoming strategies to supply chain sustainability innovation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104819 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  524. Heath, G.A., Ravikumar, D., Hansen, B., & Kupets, E. (2022). A critical review of the circular economy for lithium-ion batteries and photovoltaic modules – status, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 72(6), 478–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2022.2068878 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  525. Huang, Y.-F., Azevedo, S.G., Lin, T.-J., Cheng, C.-S., & Lin, C.-T. (2021). Exploring the decisive barriers to achieve circular economy: Strategies for the textile innovation in Taiwan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1406–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.007 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  526. Jaeger, B., & Upadhyay, A. (2020). Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(4), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0047 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  527. Jensen, S.F., Kristensen, J.H., Uhrenholt, J.N., Rincón, M.C., Adamsen, S., & Waehrens, B.V. (2022). Unlocking Barriers to Circular Economy: An ISM-Based Approach to Contextualizing Dependencies. Sustainability, 14(15), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159523 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  528. Jerome, A., Helander, H., Ljunggren, M., & Janssen, M. (2022). Mapping and testing circular economy product-level indicators: A critical review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 178, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106080 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  529. Jesus, A. de, & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  530. Kirchherr, J. (2022). Circular economy and growth: A critical review of “post-growth” circularity and a plea for a circular economy that grows. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 179, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106033 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  531. Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  532. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  533. Korhonen, J. (2004). Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model: strategic applications of industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(8–10), 809–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.026 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  534. Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018a). Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  535. Korhonen, J., Malmborg, F. von, Strachan, P.A., & Ehrenfeld, J.R. (2004). Management and policy aspects of industrial ecology: an emerging research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(5), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.415 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  536. Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S.E. (2018b). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  537. Kreye, M.E., & van Donk, D.P. (2021). Servitization for consumer products: an empirical exploration of challenges and benefits for supply chain partners. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(5), 494–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2020-0439 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  538. Lazarevic, D., & Valve, H. (2017). Narrating expectations for the circular economy: Towards a common and contested European transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  539. Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  540. Lowe, B.H., Bimpizas-Pinis, M., Zerbino, P., & Genovese, A. (2024). Methods to estimate the circular economy rebound effect: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 443, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141063 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  541. Lu, H., Zhao, G., & Liu, S. (2024). Integrating circular economy and Industry 4.0 for sustainable supply chain management: a dynamic capability view. Production Planning & Control, 35(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2063198 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  542. Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S., Mishra, N., Singh, A., Rana, N.P., Dora, M., & Dwivedi, Y. (2018). Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449265 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  543. Manning, J. (2017). In Vivo Coding. In J. Matthes; C.S. Davis, & R.F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1-2). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0270 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  544. Mayring, P. (2022). Qualitative content analysis, Los Angeles, SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  545. Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  546. Millar, N., McLaughlin, E., & Börger, T. (2019). The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?. Ecological Economics, 158, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.012 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  547. Milne, M.J., & Adler, R.W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910270138 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  548. Mishra, J.L., Hopkinson, P.G., & Tidridge, G. (2018). Value creation from circular economy-led closed loop supply chains: a case study of fast-moving consumer goods. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449245 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  549. Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  550. Nasir, M.H.A., Genovese, A., Acquaye, A.A., Koh, S., & Yamoah, F. (2017). Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  551. Norouzi, M., Chàfer, M., Cabeza, L.F., Jiménez, L., & Boer, D. (2021). Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  552. Pacurariu, R.L., Vatca, S.D., Lakatos, E.S., Bacali, L., & Vlad, M. (2021). A Critical Review of EU Key Indicators for the Transition to the Circular Economy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168840 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  553. Rockström, J., Steffen, W.L., Noone, K., Persson, A., & Chapin III, F.S. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 1–32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  554. Rodriguez-Anton, J.M., Rubio-Andrada, L., Celemín-Pedroche, M.S., & Alonso-Almeida, M.D.M. (2019). Analysis of the relations between circular economy and sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(8), 708–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1666754 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  555. Saccani, N., Bressanelli, G., & Visintin, F. (2023). Circular supply chain orchestration to overcome Circular Economy challenges: An empirical investigation in the textile and fashion industries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  556. Sarkis, J. (2012). A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211212924 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  557. Schöggl, J.-P., Stumpf, L., & Baumgartner, R.J. (2020). The narrative of sustainability and circular economy – A longitudinal review of two decades of research. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105073 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  558. Seuring, S., & Gold, S. (2012). Conducting content‐analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258609 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  559. Sharma, M., Jain, N.L., & Purohit, J.K. (2023a). Analysis of circular economy barriers in manufacturing context for indian industries: a BWM ranking process. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 29349-29377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03868-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  560. Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Prasad, M., & Bartwal, S. (2023b). Overcoming barriers to circular economy implementation in the oil & gas industry: Environmental and social implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 391, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136133 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  561. Singh, R.K., Kumar, A., Garza-Reyes, J.A., & de Sá, M.M. (2020). Managing operations for circular economy in the mining sector: An analysis of barriers intensity. Resources Policy, 69, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101752 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  562. Skene, K.R. (2018). Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work. Sustainability Science, 13(2), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  563. Sonar, H., Ghag, N., Kharde, Y., & Ghosh, S. (2023). Analysis of barriers affecting circular economy adoption in food supply chain: A strategic perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5273–5288. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3416 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  564. Sopha, B.M., Purnamasari, D.M., & Ma’mun, S. (2022). Barriers and Enablers of Circular Economy Implementation for Electric-Vehicle Batteries: From Systematic Literature Review to Conceptual Framework. Sustainability, 14(10), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106359 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  565. Takacs, F., Brunner, D., & Frankenberger, K. (2022). Barriers to a circular economy in small- and medium-sized enterprises and their integration in a sustainable strategic management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132227 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  566. Thinakaran, S., Chandravelu, P., Ponnambalam, S.G., Sankaranarayanan, B., & Karuppiah, K. (2023). Analyzing the Challenges to Circular Economy in Indian Fashion Industry. IEEE Access, 11, 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3233197 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  567. Thomé, A.M.T., Scavarda, L.F., & Scavarda, A.J. (2016). Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Production Planning & Control, 27(5), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  568. Tosi, D., Gusmerotti, N.M., Testa, F., & Frey, M. (2024). How companies navigate circular economy paradoxes: An organizational perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 353, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120269 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  569. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  570. Winans, K., Kendall, A., & Deng, H. (2017). The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.123 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  571. Zink, T., & Geyer, R. (2017). Circular Economy Rebound. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12545 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  572. Zotti, J., & Bigano, A. (2019). Write circular economy, read economy’s circularity. How to avoid going in circles. Economia Politica, 36(2), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-019-00145-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-303
  573. Aboelenien, A., Baudet, A., & Chow, A. M. (2023). ‘You need to change how you consume’: Ethical influencers, their audiences and their linking strategies. Journal of Marketing Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2023.2218853 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  574. Alcalde-Calonge, A., Sáez-Martínez, F. J., & Ruiz-Palomino, P. (2022). Evolution of research on circular economy and related trends and topics. A thirteen-year review. Ecological Informatics, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101716 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  575. Arnould, E. J., & Wallendorf, M. (1994). Market-Oriented ethnography: Interpretation building and marketing strategy formulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  576. Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  577. Aschemann-Witzel, J., & Zielke, S. (2017). Can’t buy me green? A review of consumer perceptions of and behavior toward the price of organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(1), pp. 211–251. Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12092 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  578. Bajde, D., & Rojas-Gaviria, P. (2021). Creating responsible subjects: The role of mediated affective encounters. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(3), 492–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  579. Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  580. Bohnenberger, K. (2021). Can “Sufficiency” reconcile social and environmental goals? A Q-methodological analysis of German housing policy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(1), 171–189. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  581. Borchers, N. S., & Enke, N. (2021). Managing strategic influencer communication: A systematic overview on emerging planning, organization, and controlling routines. Public Relations Review, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102041 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  582. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2011).How to design a winning business model. Harvard Business Review. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  583. Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  584. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., Del Vecchio, P., & Urbinati, A. (2020). Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1734–1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  585. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  586. Connors, S., Anderson-MacDonald, S., & Thomson, M. (2017). Overcoming the ‘Window Dressing’ effect: Mitigating the negative effects of inherent skepticism towards corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  587. Edeling, A., & Wies, S. (2024). Embracing entrepreneurship in the creator economy: The rise of creatrepreneurs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 41(3), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.07.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  588. Erz, A., Marder, B., & Osadchaya, E. (2018). Hashtags: Motivational drivers, their use, and differences between influencers and followers. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.030 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  589. Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  590. Fourstarzz Media. (2020). Leading platforms for influencer marketing worldwide as of January 2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1241723/platforms-influencer-marketing/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  591. Fronell, C., Mithas, S., V. Morgeson, F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. Journal of Marketing, 70, 3–14. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  592. Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., & Csik, M. (2013). The St. Gallen Business Model Navigator. www.bmi-lab.ch Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  593. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, pp. 757–768. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  594. Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  595. Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003). The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  596. Heiskanen, E., & Pantzar, M. (1997). Toward sustainable consumption: Two new perspectives. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 409–442. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  597. Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  598. Hudders, L., & Lou, C. (2023). The rosy world of influencer marketing? Its bright and dark sides, and future research recommendations. International Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2137318 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  599. Husemann, K. C., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2019). Consumer deceleration. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(6), 1142–1163. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy047 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  600. Insider Intelligence. (2022). Number of Instagram users worldwide from 2020 to 2025 (in billions). Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/183585/instagram-number-of-global-users/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  601. Johnson, B. K., Potocki, B., & Veldhuis, J. (2019). Is that my friend or an advert? The effectiveness of instagram native advertisements posing as social posts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(3), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  602. Jungell-Michelsson, J., & Heikkurinen, P. (2022). Sufficiency: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics, 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107380 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  603. Ki, C. W. ‘Chloe,’ Cuevas, L. M., Chong, S. M., & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  604. Ki, C. W. ‘Chloe,’ & Kim, Y. K. (2019). The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology and Marketing, 36(10), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21244 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  605. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, pp. 221–232. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  606. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography Redefined. SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  607. Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  608. Kozinets, R. V, De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74, 71–89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  609. Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146–172. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0415 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  610. Leung, F. F., Gu, F. F., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). Online influencer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(2), 226–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00829-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  611. Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  612. Luukkonen, R., Närvänen, E., & Becker, L. (2024). Consumer collectives in the circular economy: A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 45, pp. 281–293. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  613. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). Business Models and their Elements. Position Paper for the International Workshop on Business Models. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  614. Perera, B. Y., Chaudhury, S. R., Albinsson, P. A., & Nafees, L. (2021). This is who I am: Instagram as Counterspace for shared gendered ethnic identity expressions. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 6(2), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1086/713288 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  615. Potting, J., Hekkert, M. P., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: measuring innovation in the product chain. Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving, (2544). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  616. Riedl, M., Schwemmer, C., Ziewiecki, S., & Ross, L. M. (2021). The rise of political influencers-perspectives on a trend towards meaningful content. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.752656 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  617. Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  618. Sozuer, S., Carpenter, G. S., Kopalle, P. K., McAlister, L. M., & Lehmann, D. R. (2020). The past, present, and future of marketing strategy. Marketing Letters, 31(2–3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09529-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  619. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/209413 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  620. Suski, P., Palzkill, A., & Speck, M. (2022). Sufficiency in social practices: An underestimated potential for the transformation to a circular economy. Frontiers in Sustainability, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.1008165 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  621. Takacs, F. (2021). Managerial and organizational antecedents of business model innovation for a circular economy. White Paper of the Institute of Management & Strategy, University of St. Gallen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  622. Takacs, F., Stechow, R., & Frankenberger, K. (2020). Business model innovation for the circular economy. White Paper of the Institute of Management & Strategy, University of St. Gallen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  623. Thompson, C. J., & Arsel, Z. (2004). The Starbucks brandscape and consumers’ (anticorporate) experiences of glocalization. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1086/425098 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  624. Velenturf, A. P. M., & Purnell, P. (2021). Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, pp. 1437–1457. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  625. Villalba-Eguiluz, U., Sahakian, M., González-Jamett, C., & Etxezarreta, E. (2023). Social and solidarity economy insights for the circular economy: Limited-profit and sufficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138050 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  626. Wilson, A. V., & Bellezza, S. (2022). Consumer minimalism. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 796–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab038 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  627. Ye, G., Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The value of influencer marketing for business: A bibliometric analysis and managerial omplications. Journal of Advertising, 50(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1857888 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  628. Zabel, C. (2021). The business of influencing: Business models of social media influencers-a literature review. Nordic Journal of Media Management, 2(3), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.5278/njmm.2597-0445.6948 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339
  629. Zukunftsinstitut. (2019). Der Siegeszug der Sinnfluencer. https://www.zukunftsinstitut.de/zukunftsthemen/marketing/der-siegeszug-der-sinnfluencer Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2944-3741-2025-3-339

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien