Introduction: The contestation of gender equality in Europe

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1
Open Access Vollzugriff

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1

Introduction: The contestation of gender equality in Europe

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abou-Chadi, T., Breyer, M., & Gessler, T. (2021). The (re)politicisation of gender in Western Europe. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 4(2), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16177312096679 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  2. Ahrens, P., & Meier, P. (2026). From Gender Equality Champion to Anti-Gender Battleground? The European Parliament and the Contestation of Gender Equality and LGBTQIA+ Inclusivity. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 11(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  3. Alexander, A. C., & Off, G. (2025). Attitudes toward Political Authoritarianism in Economically Advanced Democracies: The Role of Gender Values and Norms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009374309 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  4. Ayoub, P. M. (2013). Cooperative transnationalism in contemporary Europe: Europeanization and political opportunities for LGBT mobilization in the European Union. European Political Science Review, 5(2), 279–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000161 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  5. de Lange, S. L., & Mügge, L. M. (2015). Gender and right-wing populism in the Low Countries: Ideological variations across parties and time. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2015.1014199 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  6. Dietz, M., & Otteni, C. (2026). From Rainbow Flags to Red Flags: How Attitudes Toward Gender Equality and LGBTIQ+ Shape Voting Behavior. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 11(1), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  7. Dietz, M., & Roßteutscher, S. (2024). Different Colors of the Same Rainbow? The Polarization of Gender Issues and its Campaign Potential. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/27qyt Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  8. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse. Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  9. Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  10. Indelicato, M. E., & Magalhães Lopes, M. (2024). Understanding populist far-right anti-immigration and anti-gender stances beyond the paradigm of gender as ‘a symbolic glue’: Giorgia Meloni’s modern motherhood, neo-Catholicism, and reproductive racism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 31(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068241230819 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  11. Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2019). Populism and feminist politics: The cases of Finland and Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1108–1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12333 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  12. Kaushik, K. (2026). Care or control in times of crisis? Gendered identity narratives and democratic resilience in digital public sphere. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 11(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  13. Kroeber, C., & Dingler, S. C. (2026). Is the ideal political leader still a man? Gendered Conceptions of Political Leadership in the Contemporary Political Elite in Western European Democracies. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 11(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  14. Kugelmeier López, A. M. (2026). A feminist promise? Gender equality in the rhetoric of Ursula von der Leyen. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 11(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  15. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds). (2018). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  16. Lombardo, E., Meier, P., & Verloo, M. (Eds). (2009). The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality (0 edn). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203881330 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  17. Luxton, L., Jabra, D., & Braun, D. (2025). Anti-feminism in the spotlight: Media coverage of German parties’ gender and sexuality policies in the 2024 European Parliament election campaign. European Journal of Communication, 40(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231251349002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  18. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  19. Off, G. (2024). Multidimensional and intersectional cultural grievances over gender, sexuality and immigration. European Journal of Political Research, 63(4), 1351–1373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12665 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  20. Off, G., Alexander, A., & Charron, N. (2025). Is there a gender youth gap in far-right voting and cultural attitudes? European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088Y2025D000000077 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  21. Otteni, C. (2025). Polarized Equality? Ideological and Affective Divides Over Gender Equality in Europe. Social Science Quarterly, 106(7), e70120. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70120 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  22. Reinhardt, S., Heft, A., & Pavan, E. (2024). Varieties of antigenderism: The politicization of gender issues across three European populist radical right parties. Information, Communication & Society, 27(7), 1273–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2246536 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  23. Righetti, N., Kulichkina, A., Almeida Paroni, B., Cseri, Z. F., Aguirre, S. I., & Maikovska, K. (2025). Mainstreaming and transnationalization of anti-gender ideas through social media: The case of CitizenGO. Information, Communication & Society, 28(15), 2658–2681. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2470229 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  24. Roth, J., & Sauer, B. (2022). Worldwide Anti-Gender Mobilization Right-wing Contestations of Women’s and Gender Rights. In A. Scheele, J. Roth, & H. Winkel (Eds), Global Contestations of Gender Rights (pp. 99–114). Bielefeld University Press / transcript Verlag. https://www.transcript-open.de/isbn/6069 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  25. Tronina, D. (2024). Virtual Brokers and National Boundaries: Transnational Online Networks in European Anti-Gender Movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 29(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-29-4-487 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  26. Vida, B. (Ed.). (2022). The gendered politics of crises and de-democratization: Opposition to gender equality. ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  27. Volk, S. (2025). The AfD and Antifeminism in Germany, 2014–2025: Family First, Trans Panic Second. German Politics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2025.2587228 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  28. Wallaschek, S., Kaushik, K., Verbalyte, M., Sojka, A., Sorci, G., Trenz, H.-J., & Eigmüller, M. (2022). Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  29. Wallaschek, S., & Minkus, L. (2026). Gender Equality Between Rights and Resentment: Social Media Engagement and Gender Attitudes Across Europe. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 11(1), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  30. Wallaschek, S., Verbalyte, M., & Eigmüller, M. (2024). Cleavage theory meets gender equality: Examining party positions in Germany. European Politics and Society, 25(5), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2024.2304591 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  31. Weeks, A. C., Caravantes, P., Espírito-Santo, A., Lombardo, E., Stratigaki, M., & Gul, S. (2025). When is gender on party agendas? Manifestos and (De-)democratisation in Greece, Portugal, and Spain. South European Society and Politics, 30(4), 561–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2024.2412746 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  32. Wilhelmsen, M. E. (2026). “We like to provoke the ladies” – A qualitative study of climate change skepticism as masculinity expression in Southern Norway. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 11(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-1
  33. Abels, G. (2025). Gender and descriptive representation: What’s new after the 2024 elec-tion?. In M. Kaeding, M. Müller & A. Hoppe (Eds.), The 2024 European Parliament Elections. The Future of Europe (239–250). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  34. Abels, G. (2019). The powers of the European Parliament: Implications for gender equality policy. In P. Ahrens & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament: Struc-tures, policies, and practices (19–34). London: Rowman & Littlefield International. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  35. Abels, G., & Klöckner, T. (2025). „Eine Union der Gleichheit“ – Bilanz und Perspektiven der Präsidentschaft von der Leyens. Integration, 48(3), 202–217. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  36. Abels, G., & Mushaben, J. M. (2020). Great expectations, structural limitations: Ursula von der Leyen and the Commission's New Equality Agenda. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(1), 121–132. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  37. Abels, G., van der Vleuten, A., MacRae, H., & Krizsán, A. (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  38. Ahrens, P. (2019). Working against the tide? Institutionalizing gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament. In P. Ahrens & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament: Structures, policies, and practices (85–101). London: Rowman & Littlefield Interna-tional. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  39. Ahrens, P. (2016). The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in the Europe-an Parliament: Taking advantage of Institutional power play. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(4), 778–793. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  40. Ahrens, P., & Erzeel, S. (2024). Handbook. Beyond numbers: Stories of gender equality in and through parliaments. INTER PARES/IDEA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  41. Ahrens, P., Gaweda, B., & Kantola, J. (2022). Reframing the language of human rights? Political group contestations on women’s and LGBTQI rights in European Parliament de-bates. Journal of European Integration, 44(6), 803–819. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  42. Ahrens, P., & Kantola, J. (2023). Political group formation in the European Parliament: Ne-gotiating democracy and gender. Party Politics, 29(5), 817–828. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  43. Ahrens, P., & Meier, P. (2024). From parliament to party: The gender‐sensitive parliamen-tary group. Politics and Governance, 12(X), XX-XX. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  44. Ahrens, P., Meier, P., & Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2023). The European Parliament and gender equal-ity: An analysis of achievements based on the concept of power. Journal of Common Market Stud-ies, 61(4), 1065–1081. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  45. Ahrens, P., & Woodward, A. (2020). Adjusting venues and voices: populist and right-wing par-ties, the European Parliament and civil society equality organizations 2014–2019. European Politics and Society, 22(4), 486–502. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  46. Ayoub, P. (2016). When states come out: Europe’s sexual minorities and the politics of visibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  47. Berthet, V. (2022a). Mobilization against sexual harassment in the European Parliament: The MeTooEP campaign. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 29(2), 331–346. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  48. Berthet, V. (2022b). Norm under fire: Support for and opposition to the EU’s ratification of the Istanbul Convention in the European Parliament. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 24(5), 675–698. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  49. Berthet, V. (2022c). United in crisis: Abortion politics in the European Parliament and politi-cal groups’ dispute over EU values. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(6), 1797–1814. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  50. Berthet, V., & Kantola, J. (2021). Gender, violence, and political institutions: Struggles over sexual harassment in the European Parliament. Social Politics, 28(1), 143–167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  51. Berthet, V., & Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2025). EU Values in Gendered Violence Legislation: The Directive on Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. In G. Abels, J. Kantola, E. Lombardo & H. Müller (Eds.), The European Commission under President Ursula von der Leyen: Gender, Leadership, Policies and Crises (324–341). Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  52. Bönisch, L.E. (2022). What factors shape the substantive representation of lesbians, gays and bisexuals in parliament? Testing the impact of minority membership, political values and awareness. Parliamentary Affairs, 75(4), 843–866. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  53. Brack, N. (2018). Opposing Europe in the European Parliament. Rebels and Radicals in the Cham-ber. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  54. Campbell, R., & Childs, S. (2014). Parents in parliament: “Where’s mum?.” The Political Quarterly, 85(4), 487–492. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  55. Catalano Weeks, A. (2022). Making Gender Salient: From Gender Quota Laws to Policy. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  56. Chaney, P. (2013). Institutionally homophobic? Political parties and the substantive repre-sentation of LGBT people: Westminster and regional UK elections 1945–2011. Policy & Poli-tics, 41(1), 101–121. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  57. Chaney, P. (2006). Critical mass, deliberation and the substantive representation of wom-en: Evidence from the UK’s devolution programme. Political Studies, 54(4), 691–714. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  58. Childs, S. (2023). Feminist institutional change: The case of the UK women and equalities committee. Parliamentary Affairs, 76(3), 507–531. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  59. Childs, S. (2017). Diversity Sensitive Parliaments. Parliamentary Practice in Comparison: A Brief-ing. Bristol: University of Bristol. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  60. Childs, S. (2016). The Good Parliament. Bristol: University of Bristol. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  61. Childs, S., & Palmieri, S. (2023). Gender sensitive parliaments: Feminizing formal political institutions. In M. Sawer, L. A., Banaszak, J. True & J. Kantola (Eds.), Handbook on Feminist Governance (174–188). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  62. Chiva, C. (2019). Women’s representation in the European Parliament after the 2019 elec-tions. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 2(3), 419–420. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  63. Collier, C.N., & Raney, T. (2018). Understanding sexism and sexual harassment in politics: A comparison of Westminster parliaments in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Social Politics, 25(3), 432–455. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  64. CPA (2001). Gender Sensitizing Commonwealth Parliaments. London: CPA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  65. Crespy, A., & Parks, L. (2019). The European Parliament and civil society. In O. Costa (Ed), The European Parliament in times of EU crisis. Dynamics and transformations (203–223). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  66. Dodeigne, J., Erzeel, S., & Randour, F. (2025). Putting the European Parliament’s gender exceptionalism to the test: MEPs’ specialisation in masculine and feminine policy domains in parliamentary questions. European Union Politics, 26(1), 115–144. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  67. EIGE (2019). Gender Equality in National Parliaments across the EU and the European Parliament. Results from EIGE’s Gender-sensitive Parliaments Tool. Vilnius: EIGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  68. Elomäki, A. (2021). ‘It’s a total no-no’: The strategic silence about gender in the European Parliament’s economic governance policies. International Political Science Review, 44(3), 403–417. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  69. Elomäki, A., & Ahrens, P. (2022). Contested gender mainstreaming in the European Par-liament: political groups and committees as gatekeepers. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 5(3), 322–340. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  70. Elomäki, A., & Kantola, J. (2023) Feminist Governance in the European Parliament: The Political Struggle over the Inclusion of Gender in the EU’s COVID-19 Response. Politics & Gender, 19(2), 327–348. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  71. Erikson, J., & Freidenvall, L. (2024). Exploring sustainability in parliamentary gender equali-ty work. Insights from the Swedish Riksdag. NORA, 32(1), 17–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  72. Erikson, J., & Josefsson, C. (2021). Equal playing field? On the intersection between gen-der and being young in the Swedish Parliament. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(1), 81–100. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  73. Erikson, J., & Josefsson, C. (2019). The legislature as a gendered workplace: Exploring members of parliament's experiences of working in the Swedish parliament. International Political Science Review, 40(2), 197–214. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  74. Erikson, J., & Verge, T. (2022). Gender, power and privilege in the parliamentary work-place. Parliamentary Affairs, 75(1), 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  75. European Parliament (2017). European Parliament resolution of 26 October 2017 on com-bating sexual harassment and abuse in the EU (2017/2897(RSP)). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  76. European Parliament (2021a). European Parliament Resolution of 11 March 2021 on the declaration of the EU as an LGBTIQ Freedom Zone (2021/2557(RSP)). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  77. European Parliament (2021b). European Parliament resolution of 8 July 2021 on breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the legal changes adopted by the Hungarian Parliament (2021/2780(RSP)) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  78. European Parliament (2025). European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 November 2025 on the amendment of the European Electoral act, allowing Members to vote in plena-ry by proxy voting during pregnancy and after giving birth (2025/2195(INL) – 2025/0900(APP)). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  79. European Union (2024). Directive (EU) 2024/1385 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on combating violence against women and domestic violence. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  80. Fortin-Rittberger, J., & Rittberger, B. (2015). Nominating women for Europe: Exploring the role of political parties’ recruitment procedures for European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research, 54(4), 767–783. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  81. Fortin-Rittberger, J., & Rittberger, B. (2014). Do electoral rules matter? Explaining national differences in women’s representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 15(4), 496–520. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  82. Frech, E. (Ed.) (2025). Special Issue: Gendered European careers? Representation and the challenges in women's political careers. European Union Politics, 26(1), 3–202. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  83. Frech, E. (2024). Gendered exits: The role of parliamentarians, parties and voters in wom-en’s departure from the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 26(1), 145–166. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  84. Frech, E., & Kopsch, S. (2024). Beyond Rhetoric: The European Parliament as a Work-place for Parents and Current Reform Debates. Politics and Governance, 12, Article 8078. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8078 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  85. Franceschet, S., Och, M., & Xydias, C. (2024). Gender, family status, and parliamentary careers in the German Bundestag. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 13(1), 138–158. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  86. Franceschet, S., Piscopo, J. M., & Thomas, G. (2016). Supermadres, maternal legacies and women’s political participation in contemporary Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 48(1), 1–32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  87. Gilby, L., & Koivusalo, M. (2024). ‘It's very much part of this movement to undermine democracy’: A qualitative study of European Union level opposition strategies against reproductive health and rights. Social Science & Medicine, 358, 117232. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  88. Grace, J., & Sawer, M. (2016). Representing gender equality: Specialised parliamentary bodies. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(4), 745–747. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  89. Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  90. Gros, M., & Griera, M. (2025). EU conservatives vote with far right to approve cuts to green rules. Politico (2025, November 13). Retrieved from: https://www.politico.eu/article/epp-votes-with-far-right-to-approve-cuts-to-green-rules/ (last accessed: 7.1.2025) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  91. Hix, S., Noury, A.G., & Roland, G. (2007) Democratic politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  92. Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?. Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 956–989. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  93. IPU (2018). Sexism, Harassment and Violence against Women in Parliaments in Europe. Geneva: IPU. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  94. IPU (2011). Gender-Sensitive Parliaments: A Global Review of Good Practice. Geneva: IPU. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  95. Jacquot, S. (2015). Transformations in EU gender equality. From emergence to dismantling. Ba-singstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  96. Joshi, D. K., & Echle, C. (Eds.) (2023). Substantive Representation of Women in Asian Parlia-ments. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  97. Joshi, D. K., & Goehrung, R. (2021). Mothers and fathers in Parliament: MP parental status and family gaps from a global perspective. Parliamentary Affairs, 74(2), 296–313. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  98. Juvonen, T. (2016). Out and Elected: Political Careers of Openly Gay and Lesbian Politi-cians in Germany and Finland. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 19(1), 49–71. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  99. Kantola, J. (2022). Parliamentary politics and polarization around gender: The case of tack-ling gendered inequalities in political groups in the European Parliament. In P. Ahrens, A. Elomäki & J. Kantola (Eds.), European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times (221–243). Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  100. Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2023). The European Parliament as a gender equality actor: a contradictory forerunner. In M. Sawer, L. A. Banaszak, J. True & J. Kantola (Eds.), Hand-book of Feminist Governance (299–310). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  101. Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2021a). Challenges to democratic practices and discourses in the European Parliament: Feminist perspectives on the politics of political groups. Social Politics, 28(3), 579–602. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  102. Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2021b). Strategies of right populists in opposing gender equal-ity in a polarized European Parliament. International Political Science Review, 42(5), 565–579. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  103. Kantola, J., & Miller, C. (2022). Gendered leadership in the European Parliament’s political groups. In H. Müller & I. Tömmel (Eds.), Women and leadership in the European Union (150–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  104. Kantola, J., & Miller, C. (2021). Party politics and radical right populism in the European Parliament: Analysing political groups as democratic actors. Journal of Common Market Stud-ies, 59(4), 782–801. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  105. Kantola, J., & Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2019). Gendering the representative work of the Eu-ropean Parliament: A political analysis of women MEP’s perceptions of gender equality in party groups. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(4), 768–786. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  106. Krook, M. L. (2018). Westminster too: On sexual harassment in British politics. Political Quarterly, 89(1), 65–72. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  107. Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for Women in Politics. Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  108. Krook, M. L., & Mackay F. (Eds.) (2011). Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  109. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.) (2017). Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe. Mobilizing against Equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  110. Lang, (2021). Civil Society. In G. Abels, A. van der Vleuten, H. & A. Krizsán, (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics (85–101). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  111. Lecerf, M. (2025). Maternity leave and voting procedures in the European Parliament and EU na-tional parliaments. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service Brief. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  112. Lehmann, T. (2025, June 19). Neue Prüfungskommission. In Brüssel eskaliert der Streit über die NGO-Förderung. Spiegel Online, https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/eu-finanzierung-konservative-und-rechte-fuehren-kontrollgremium-fuer-ngos-ein-a-d020e94c-dea7-47f6-bb4a-b2fbbe5deb36?sara_ref=re-em-em-sh Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  113. Lomazzi, V., & Crespi, I. (2019). Gender mainstreaming and gender equality in Europe: Policies, culture and public opinion. Bristol: Bristol University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  114. Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2019). The significance of symbolic representation for gender issues in politics. NORA, 27(4), 231–244. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  115. Lovenduski, J. (2005). Feminizing politics. Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  116. Mackay, F. (2014). Nested newness, institutional innovation, and the gendered limits of change. Politics & Gender, 10(14), 549–571. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  117. Magni, G., & Reynolds, A. (2021). Voter preferences and the political underrepresentation of minority groups: Lesbian, gay, and transgender candidates in advanced democracies. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1199–1215. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  118. Mariani, G. (2025). Transnational networks against equality: The anti-gender mobilization in the European Parliament, Social Politics https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaf015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  119. Meier, P., & Verlooy, R. (2026). On the limits of the playing field: factors constraining oppo-sition to anti-gender mobilization in the Belgian House of Representatives. In A. Ana (Ed.), Resistance to anti-gender politics: Social movements, coalitions and institutional politics in Europe (XX-XX). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  120. Mondo, E., & Close, C. (2018). Morality politics in the European parliament. A qualitative insight into MEPs’ voting behaviour on abortion and human embryonic stem cell research. Journal of European Integration, 40(7), 1001–1018. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  121. Montoya, C. M., Bejarano, C., Brown, N. E., & Gershon, A. S. (2022). The intersectional dynamics of descriptive representation. Politics & Gender, 18(2), 483–512. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  122. Mos, M. (2013). Conflicted normative power Europe: The European Union and sexual mi-nority rights. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 9(1), 78–93. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  123. Mos, M., & Rubio Grundell, L. (2025). Opportunity beckons: the anti-gender movement at the European Parliament. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 27(3), 560–583. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  124. Norris, S. (2024, December 19). MEPs Demand Answers Over EU Funding of Anti-Abortion Charity. openDemocracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/eu-anti-abortion-funding-questions-world-youth-alliance-erasmus/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  125. Nugent, (2019). ‘Feminist to Its fingertips’? Gendered divisions of labour and the Commit-tee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality. In P. Ahrens & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament: Structures, Policies, and Practices (123–140). London: Row-man & Littlefield International. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  126. Palmieri, S. (2021). Realizing Gender Equality in Parliament. A Guide for Parliaments in the OSCE Region. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  127. Palmieri, S. (2018, June 25). Gender-sensitive parliaments. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.215 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  128. Palmieri, S., Williams, B., & Sawer, M. (2021). Parliament as a gendered workplace: Intro-duction to this special issue. Australasian Parliamentary Review, 36(2), 8–19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  129. Paxton, P., & Hughes, M.M. (2016). Women, Politics, and Power. A Global Perspective. Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  130. Philipps, A. (1995). The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  131. Pitkin, H. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of Califor-nia Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  132. Rai, S. M., & Spary, C. (2019). Performing Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  133. Roggeband, C., Rawłuszko, M., Meier, P., Díaz Fernández, S., Lombardo, E., & Cara-vantes, P. (2025). Anti-gender politics and European democracies' legacies of exclusion and violence. Women’s Studies International Forum, 113 (September-October), XX-XX. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  134. Sawer, M. (2020). Gender mainstreaming and the substantive representation of women: Where do parliamentary bodies fit?. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 8(3), 648–660. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  135. Sawer, M., Palmieri, S., & Freidenvall, L. (2014, September 1). Playing their Part? Parlia-mentary Institutions and Gender Mainstreaming. SSRN, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2488867 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  136. Seldenthuis, N. (2024). From Presence to Impact: Assessing the Substantive Impact of Female Representation in the European Parliament’s Committees. PhD Thesis Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  137. Shreeves, R., & Hahnkamper-Vandenbulcke, N. (2021). Gender mainstreaming in the European Par-liament: State of play. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service Brief. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  138. Slootmaeckers, K., Touquet, H., & Vermeersch, P. (Eds.) (2016). The EU Enlargement and Gay Politics: The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on Rights, Activism and Prejudice. London: Pal-grave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  139. Smith, J. C. (2022). Effective and Inclusive Parliaments. London: CPA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  140. Swiebel, J. (2009). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender human rights: the search for an international strategy. Contemporary Politics, 15(1), 19–35. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  141. Thiel, M. (2021). The European Union’s International Promotion of LGBTI Rights. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  142. Thomas, M., & Bittner, A. (Eds.) (2017). Mothers and others: The role of parenthood in politics. Vancouver: UBC Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  143. Tremblay, M. (2019). Outing representation: lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer politi-cians’ narratives. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 2(2), 221–236. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  144. Treaty of Amsterdam (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Un-ion, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, 2 Octo-ber 1997, Official Journal C 340, 10 November 1997. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  145. Treaty of Rome (1957). Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, 25 March 1957, entered into force 1 January 1958. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  146. van der Vleuten, A. (2019). The European Parliament as a constant promoter of gender equality. Another European myth?. In P. Ahrens & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the European Parliament: Structures, Policies, and Practices (35–49). London: Rowman & Little-field International. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  147. van der Vleuten, A. (2007). The Price of Gender Equality: Member States and Governance in the European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  148. Verge, T. (2022a). Evoking equality: The gender sensitivity of parliaments through their symbolic function. Political Studies, 70(4), 1048–1067. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  149. Verge, T. (2022b). A chamber of one's own: Institutional claim-making on gender equality and the symbolic role of parliaments. Politics & Gender, 18(1), 95–125. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  150. Verloo, M., & Paternotte, D. (2018). The Feminist Project under Threat in Europe. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 1–5. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  151. Xydias, C. (2016). Discrepancies in women’s presence between European national legisla-tures and the European Parliament: A contextual explanation. Political Research Quarterly, 69(4), 800–812. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  152. Zimmermann, J. (2019). Staging power: Constructing gender in the debates of the Europe-an Parliament, 1999–2014. In P. Ahrens & L. Rolandsen Agustín (Eds.), Gendering the Euro-pean Parliament: Structures, Policies, and Practices (51–66). London: Rowman & Littlefield Inter-national. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-9
  153. Abels, G., Kantola, J., Lombardo, E., & Müller, H. (2025). Introduction: The European Commission under President Ursula von der Leyen — A critical actorness approach. In G. Abels, J. Kantola, E. Lombardo, & H. Müller (Eds.), The European Commission under President Ursula von der Leyen: Gender, leadership, policies, and crises (1–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  154. Abels, G., & Klöckner, T. (2025). “Eine Union der Gleichheit” – Bilanz und Perspektiven der Präsidentschaft Ursula von der Leyens. integration, 48(3), 202–217. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  155. Abels, G., Krizsán, A., MacRae, H., & van der Vleuten, A. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge handbook of gender and EU politics. London / New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  156. Abels, G., & Mushaben, J. M. (2020). Great expectations, structural limitations: Ursula von der Leyen and the Commission’s new equality agenda. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(S1), 121–132. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  157. Ahrens, P. (2021). Gender mainstreaming im Europäischen Parlament: Geschichte, Institutionalisierung, Hindernisse. GENDER – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft, 13(1), 11–26. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  158. Ahrens, P. (2023). Velvet triangles and more: Alliances of supranational EU gender equality actors. In M. Sawer, L. Banaszak, J. True, & J. Kantola (Eds.), Handbook of feminist governance (335–346). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  159. Ahrens, P., & Kantola, J. (2025). Gender equality in the new European Parliament: Europarties and political groups. In M. Kaeding, M. A. Hoppe, & M. Manuel (Eds.), The 2024 European Parliament elections: A turn to the right in the shadow of war (229–237). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  160. Ahrens, P., & van der Vleuten, A. (2019). EU gender equality policies in times of crisis: Different instruments, different actors, different outcomes. In I. Jungwirth & C. Bauschke-Urban (Eds.), Gender and diversity studies: European perspectives (31–54). Leverkusen-Opladen: Barbara Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  161. Cavaghan, R. (2017). Bridging rhetoric and practice: New perspectives on barriers to gendered change. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(1), 42–63. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  162. Celis, K., Kantola, J., Waylen, G., & Weldon, S. L. (2013). Introduction. Gender and politics: A gendered world, a gendered discipline. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  163. Condor, S., Tileagă, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  164. Directive implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. Official Journal of the European Communities (2000/43/EC), 22–26. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  165. Framework Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law. Official Journal of the European Union (2008/913/JHA), 55–58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  166. Eigenmann, L., Guschke, B. L., & Zippel, K. (2024). Intersectional transformation or ‘gender equality+’? Intersectionality in European Union policies on research and science. European Journal of Politics and Gender (published online ahead of print) 1–26. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  167. European Commission. (2020, March 5). A union of equality: Gender equality strategy 2020–2025 (COM/2020/152 final). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  168. Treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union (C 326/47). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  169. Hartlapp, M., Müller, H., & Tömmel, I. (2021). Gender equality and the European Commission. In G. Abels, A. Krizsán, H. MacRae, & A. Van Der Vleuten (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and EU politics (133–145). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  170. Jacquot, S. (2015). Transformations in EU gender equality. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  171. Kassim, H. (2023). The von der Leyen Commission: An early assessment. In O. Costa & S. Van Hecke (Eds.), The EU political system after the 2019 European elections (169–193). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  172. Kassim, H., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Rozenberg, O., & Bendjaballah, S. (2017). Managing the house: The Presidency, agenda control and policy activism in the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 653–674. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  173. Kugelmeier López, A. M. (2025). The “leftover” portfolio: Gender equality at the onset of von der Leyen’s second term. FEMINA POLITICA – Zeitschrift für feministische Politikwissenschaft, 34(2–2025), 75–89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  174. Lombardo, E., Meier, P., & Verloo, M. (2017). Policymaking from a gender+ equality perspective. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(1), 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  175. MacRae, H. (2010). The EU as a gender equal polity: Myths and realities. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 155–174. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  176. Mazur, A. G., & Engeli, I. (2023). Gender policy. In M. Van Gerven, C. Rothmayr Allison, & K. Schubert (Eds.), Encyclopedia of public policy (1–8). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  177. Müller, H. (2020). Political leadership and the European Commission presidency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  178. Müller, H., & Pansardi, P. (2022). Rhetoric and leadership: A comparison of female vice-presidents of the European Commission (1999–2019). In H. Müller & I. Tömmel (Eds.), Women and leadership in the European Union (129–149). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  179. Müller, H., & Tömmel, I. (2022). Strategic leadership: Ursula von der Leyen as president of the European Commission. In H. Müller & I. Tömmel (Eds.), Women and leadership in the European Union (311–330). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  180. Mushaben, J. M. (2025). Through the side door: Ursula von der Leyen’s unconventional path to power. In G. Abels, J. Kantola, E. Lombardo, & H. Müller (Eds.), The European Commission under President Ursula von der Leyen: Gender, leadership, policies, and crises (60–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  181. Pansardi, P., & Battegazzorre, F. (2018). The discursive legitimation strategies of the president of the commission: A qualitative content analysis of the State of the Union Addresses (SOTEU). Journal of European Integration, 40(7), 853–871. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  182. Reisigl, M. (2008). Rhetoric of political speeches. In R. Wodak & V. Koller (Eds.), Handbook of communication in the public sphere (243–270). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  183. Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  184. Verloo, M. (2005). Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe. A critical frame analysis approach. The Greek Review of Social Research, 117, 11–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  185. von der Leyen, U. (2019, November 27). Speech by President-elect von der Leyen in the European Parliament Plenary on the occasion of the presentation of her College of Commissioners and their programme. SPEECH/19/6408. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  186. von der Leyen, U. (2020a, November 18). Speech by President von der Leyen at the 2020 Women’s Forum Global Meeting. SPEECH/20/2149. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  187. von der Leyen, U. (2020b, June 13). Speech by President von der Leyen at the event Progettiamo il Rilancio, hosted by Giuseppe Conte, Prime Minister of Italy. SPEECH/20/1060. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  188. von der Leyen, U. (2020c, June 17). Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary – “We need to talk about racism – openly and honestly”. SPEECH/20/1114. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  189. von der Leyen, U. (2020d, November 19). Speech by President von der Leyen at the high-level conference on migration and asylum in Europe. SPEECH/20/2157. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  190. von der Leyen, U. (2020e, September 16). 2020 State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen. SPEECH/20/1655. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  191. von der Leyen, U. (2021a, February 3). Opening speech by President von der Leyen at the ETUI-ETUC Conference: “Towards a new socio-ecological contract”. SPEECH/21/404. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  192. von der Leyen, U. (2021b, October 21). Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on the rule of law crisis in Poland and the primacy of EU law. SPEECH/21/5361. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  193. von der Leyen, U. (2021c, April 26). Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on the conclusions of the European Council meeting of 25–26 March 2021 and the outcome of the high-level meeting between the EU and Turkey. SPEECH/21/1965. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  194. von der Leyen, U. (2021d, September 15). 2021 State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen. SPEECH/21/4701. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  195. von der Leyen, U. (2021e, March 4). Opening speech by President von der Leyen at the EP FEMM Interparliamentary Committee meeting, on the occasion of the International Women’s Day 2021. SPEECH/21/1017. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  196. von der Leyen, U. (2021f, March 19). Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Anti-Racism Summit. SPEECH/21/1265. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  197. von der Leyen, U. (2022a, September 29). Keynote address by President von der Leyen at the 10th annual Athens Democracy Forum. SPEECH/22/5885. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  198. von der Leyen, U. (2022b, March 21). Speech by President von der Leyen at the opening ceremony of the 9th World Water Forum. SPEECH/22/1947. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  199. von der Leyne, U. (2022c, January 27). Speech by President von der Leyen at the solemn ceremony on the occasion of the International Holocaust Remembrance Day. SPEECH/22/641. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  200. von der Leyen, U. (2022d, September 20). Speech by President von der Leyen at the 2022 Global Goalkeepers Awards by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. SPEECH/22/5669. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  201. von der Leyen, U. (2023a, September 14). Laudation by President von der Leyen for the Iranian 'Women, Life, Freedom' movement at the M100 Media Award 2023. SPEECH/23/4485. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  202. von der Leyen, U. (2023b, March 29). Speech by President von der Leyen at the second Summit for Democracy, via videoconference. SPEECH/23/2041. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  203. von der Leyen, U. (2023c, April 26). Speech by President von der Leyen at the Roma Week 2023, via video message. SPEECH/23/2451. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  204. von der Leyen, U. (2023d, April 27). Speech by President von der Leyen at the 2023 European Capitals of Inclusion and Diversity Awards, via video message. SPEECH/23/2490. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  205. von der Leyen, U. (2023e, May 25). Speech by President von der Leyen at the 15th Congress of the European Trade Union Confederation. SPEECH/23/2926. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  206. von der Leyen, U. (2023f, October 7). Speech by President von der Leyen at the plenary of the European Campus Renaissance. SPEECH/23/4821. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  207. von der Leyen, U. (2023g, March7). Address by President von der Leyen at a joint session of the Canadian parliament. SPEECH/23/1528. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  208. von der Leyen, U. (2024a, April 16). Speech by President von der Leyen at the high-level conference on the European Pillar of Social Rights. SPEECH/24/2082. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  209. von der Leyen, U. (2024b, March 08). Message by President von der Leyen on the occasion of the International Women’s Day. SPEECH/24/1381. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-33
  210. Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts–how green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (2), 417–436. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  211. Abou-Chadi, T. & Krause, W. (2020). The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: A regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science, 50 (3), 829–847. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  212. Aldrich, A. S. & Somer-Topcu, Z. (2025). Glass ceilings, glass cliffs, and quicksands: Gendered party leadership in parliamentary systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  213. Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A. & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (gen)me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28 (1), 245–260. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  214. Annesley, C., Beckwith, K. & Franceschet, S. (2019). Cabinets, ministers, and gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  215. Armstrong, B., Barnes, T. D., Chiba, D. & O’Brien, D. Z. (2024). Financial crises and the selection and survival of women finance ministers. American Political Science Review, 118 (3), 1305–1323. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  216. Bäck, H., Müller, W. C., Angelova, M. & Strobl, D. (2021). Ministerial autonomy, parliamentary scrutiny and government reform output in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 55 (2), 254–286. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  217. Bale, T. (2003). Cinderella and her ugly sisters: The mainstream and extreme right in europe's bipolarising party systems. West European Politics, 26 (3), 67–90. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  218. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G. & Zelditch, M. J. (1985). Introduction: Expectation states theory – review and assessment. In J Berger and M Zelditch (Eds.) Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (1–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  219. Biernat, M. & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 707–724. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  220. Bjarnegård, E. (2015). Gender, informal institutions and political recruitment. Explaining male dominance in parliamentary representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  221. Bjarnegård, E. (2018). Men’s political representation. Accessed 06/01/2023. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-214. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  222. Braun, S., Stegmann, S., Hernandez Bark, A. S., Junker, N. M. & Van Dick, R. (2017). Think manager—think male, think follower—think female: Gender bias in implicit followership theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47 (7), 377–388. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  223. Bright, J., Döring, H. & Little, C. (2015). Ministerial importance and survival in government: Tough at the top? West European Politics, 38 (3), 441–464. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  224. Bruckmüller, S., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F. & Haslam, S. A. (2014). Beyond the glass ceiling: The glass cliff and its lessons for organizational policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8 (1), 202–232. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  225. Burgess, D. & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, public policy, and law, 5 (3), 665. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  226. Claveria, S. (2014). Still a ‘male business’? Explaining women’s presence in executive office. West European Politics, 37 (5), 1156–1176. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  227. Collignon, S. & Rüdig, W. (2020). Harassment and intimidation of parliamentary candidates in the united kingdom. The Political Quarterly, 91 (2), 422–429. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  228. Collignon, S. & Rüdig, W. (2021). Increasing the cost of female representation? The gendered effects of harassment, abuse and intimidation towards parliamentary candidates in the uk. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31 (4), 429–449. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  229. Curtin, J., Kerby, M. & Dowding, K. (2023). Sex, gender, and promotion in executive office: Cabinet careers in the world of westminster. Governance, 36 (1), 233–254. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  230. Davidson-Schmich, L. K., Jalalzai, F. & Och, M (2023). Crisis, Gender Role Congruency, and Perceptions of Executive Leadership. Politics & Gende,r 19: 900–907. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  231. Dingler, S. C. & Helms, L. (2023). Parliamentary women opposition leaders: A comparative assessment across 28 oecd countries. Politics and Governance, 11 (1), 85–96. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  232. Dingler, S. C. & Kroeber, C. (2022). Myths about women in the political executive – how gender stereotypes shape the way MPs assess the competences of ministers. Political Research Quarterly, 76 (3), 1403–1417. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  233. Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14 (6), 807–834. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  234. Eagly, A. H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 781–797. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  235. Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109 (3), 573–598. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  236. Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M. & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of u.S. Public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75 (3), 301–315. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  237. Eckel, C. C. & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal, 108 (448), 726–735. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  238. Erikson, J. & Josefsson, C. (2023). Feminine leadership ideals and masculine practices: Exploring gendered leadership conditions in the swedish parliament. Politics & Gender, 19 (4), 1061–1086. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  239. Erikson, J. & Josefsson, C. (2024). Adverse contagion? Populist radical right parties and norms on gender balance in political institutions. Politics and Governance, 12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  240. Escobar-Lemmon, M. & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2009). Getting to the top: Career paths of women in Latin American cabinets. Political Research Quarterly, 62 (4), 685–699. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  241. Escobar-Lemmon, M. & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2016). Women in presidential cabinets power players or abundant tokens? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  242. European Institute for Gender Equality. (2025). Gender equality index 2024. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2024/compare-countries/index/map. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  243. Foschi, M., Lai, L. & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57 (4), 326–339. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  244. Franceschet, S., Krook, M. L. & Piscopo, J. M. (Eds.) (2012). The impact of gender quotas. Oxford: University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  245. Franceschet, S. & Piscopo, J. M. (2013). Sustaining gendered practices? Power, parties, and elite political networks in argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 47 (1), 85–110. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  246. Goddard, D. (2019). Entering the men's domain? Gender and portfolio allocation in european governments. European Journal of Political Research, 58 (2), 631–655. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  247. Goddard, D. (2021). Examining the appointment of women to ministerial positions across europe: 1970–2015. Party Politics, 27 (4), 631–643. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  248. Håkansson, S. (2020). Do women pay a higher price for power? Gender bias in political violence in sweden. The Journal of Politics, 83 (2), 515–531. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  249. Heilman, M. E. & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (1), 81–92. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  250. Herrick, R. & Franklin, L. D. (2019). Is it safe to keep this job? The costs of violence on the psychological health and careers of us mayors. Social Science Quarterly, 100 (6), 2047–2058. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  251. Höhmann, D., Latteier, T. & Bailer, S. (2025). An early leak in the pipeline – online abuse as a barrier for young women’s political engagement. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  252. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  253. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  254. Inglehart, R. & Norris, P. (2000). The developmental theory of the gender gap: Women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective. International Political Science Review, 21 (4), 441–63. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  255. Inter-Parliamentary Union Parline. (2025). Women in national parliaments. World average. Accessed 10.1.2025. https://data.ipu.org/women-averages/?date_year=2025&date_month=01. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  256. Jalalzai, F. (2018). Women heads of state and government. In AC Alexander, C Bolzendahl and F Jalalzai (Eds.) Measuring women’s political empowerment across the globe (257–282). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  257. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A. & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (2), 126–136. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  258. Kroeber, C. & Dingler, S. C. (2023). Crisis and gender in legislative-executive relations. Politics & Gender, 19 (3), 908–914. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  259. Kroeber, C. & Hüffelmann, J. (2022). It's a long way to the top: Women's ministerial career paths. Politics & Gender, 18 (3), 741–767. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  260. Krook, M. L. (2006). Gender quotas, norms, and politics. Politics & Gender, 2 (1), 110–118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  261. Krook, M. L. & Mackay, F. (eds.). (2010). Gender, politics and institutions towards a feminist institutionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan: London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  262. Krook, M. L. & O'Brien, D. Z. (2012). All the president’s men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. Journal of Politics, 74 (3), 840–855. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  263. Mackay, F., Kenny, M. & Chappell, L. (2010). New institutionalism through a gender lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31 (5), 573–588. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  264. Mechkova, V. & Wilson, S. L. (2021). Norms and rage: Gender and social media in the 2018 US mid-term elections. Electoral Studies, 69, 102268. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  265. Miller, G. J. (2005). The political evolution of principal-agent theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 8 (1), 203–225. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  266. Montaudon-Tomas, C. M., Montaudon-Tomas, I. M. & Lomas-Montaudon, Y. (2020). Autocratic, transactional, and servant leadership in japan, france, and mexico: A cross-culture theoretical analysis. In Ç Doğru (Ed.) Leadership styles, innovation, and social entrepreneurship in the era of digitalization (101–133). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  267. Murray, R. (2010). Parties, gender quotas and candidate selection in France. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  268. Murray, R. (2014). Quotas for men: Reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representation for all. American Political Science Review, 108 (3), 520–532. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  269. Nichols, A. L. (2016). What Do People Desire in Their Leaders? The Effect of Leadership Experience on Desired Leadership Traits. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37 (5), 658–671. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  270. O'Brien, D. Z. (2015). Rising to the top: Gender, political performance, and party leadership in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (4), 1022–1039. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  271. O’Neill, B., Pruysers, S. & Stewart, D. K. (2019). Glass cliffs or partisan pressure? Examining gender and party leader tenures and exits. Political Studies, 69 (2), 257–277. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  272. Ohmura, T., Bailer, S., Meiβner, P. & Selb, P. (2018). Party animals, career changers and other pathways into parliament. West European Politics, 41 (1), 169–195. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  273. Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A. & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28 (2), 177–193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  274. Rheault, L., Rayment, E. & Musulan, A. (2019). Politicians in the line of fire: Incivility and the treatment of women on social media. Research & Politics, 6 (1), 2053168018816228. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  275. Rosenthal, C. S. (1998). When women lead: Integrative leadership in state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  276. Rosenthal, U., Boin, R. A. & Comfort, L. K. (2001) The Changing World of Crisis and Crisis Management. Springfield:Charles C Thomas Publisher. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  277. Rosenwasser, S. M. & Dean, N. G. (1989). Gender role and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13 (1), 77–85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  278. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E. & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (1), 165–179. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  279. Saaka, S. S. (2025). Shuffled and shortchanged? The gender gap in cabinet shuffles in Africa. African Affairs, 124 (495), 175–203,. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  280. Schain, M. A. (2016). The extreme-right and immigration policy-making: Measuring direct and indirect effects. In C. Mudde (Ed.), The populist radical right. London: Routledge, 476–491. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  281. Schein, V. E. & Mueller, R. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13 (5), 439–447. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  282. Schneider, M. C. & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40 (S1), 173–213. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  283. Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91 (5), 1053–1075. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  284. Silvia, C. & Mcguire, M. (2010). Leading public sector networks: An empirical examination of integrative leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21 (2), 264–277. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  285. Strolovitch, D. Z. (2013). Of mancessions and hecoveries: Race, gender, and the political construction of economic crises and recoveries. Perspectives on Politics, 11 (1), 167–176. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  286. Strolovitch, D. Z. (2021). When does a crisis begin? Race, gender, and the subprime noncrisis of the late 1990s. In J.A.C. Remes & A Horowitz (Eds.), Critical disaster studies (51–68). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  287. Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37 (3), 261–290. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  288. Taleghani, G., Salmani, D. & Taatian, A. (2010). Survey of leadership styles in different cultures. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies, 3 (3), 91–111. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  289. Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  290. Verge, T. & Claveria, S. (2016). Gendered political resources: The case of party office. Party Politics, 24 (5), 536–548. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  291. Yeganeh, H. (2017). Cultural modernization and work-related values and attitudes. International Journal of Development Issues, 16 (2), 130–146. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  292. Aasen, M., & Sælen, H. (2022). Right-wing populism and climate policies: Explaining opposition to road tolls in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 105, 103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103222 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  293. Ahmed, S. (2015). The cultural politics of emotion (Second edition). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  294. Allen, I. K. (2022). Heated Attachments to Coal: Everyday Industrial Breadwinning Petro-Masculinity and Domestic Heating in the Silesian Home. I K. Iwińska & X. Bukowska (Red.), Gender and Energy Transition: Case Studies from the Upper Silesia Coal-mining Region (s. 189–222). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78416-4_11 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  295. Almiron, N., & Moreno, J. A. (2022). Beyond climate change denialism. Conceptual challenges in communicating climate action obstruction. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, (55), Artikkel 55. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.01 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  296. Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (Third edition.). SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  297. Anshelm, J., & Hultman, M. (2014). A green fatwā? Climate change as a threat to the masculinity of industrial modernity. NORMA, 9(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2014.908627 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  298. Benegal, S., & Holman, M. R. (2021). Understanding the importance of sexism in shaping climate denial and policy opposition. Climatic Change, 167(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03193-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  299. Boasson, E. L., & Lahn, B. (2017). Norway: A dissonant cognitive leader? | 26 | The European Union in Int. I R. K. Wurzel, D. Connely, & D. Liefferink (Red.), The European Union in international climate change politics (s. 213–228). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315627199-26/norway-dissonant-cognitive-leader-elin-lerum-boasson-b%C3%A5rd-lahn Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  300. Bond, S., Thomas, A., & Diprose, G. (2020). Making and unmaking political subjectivities: Climate justice, activism, and care. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(4), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12382 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  301. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  302. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  303. Brulle, R. J., & Roberts, J. T. (2024). Introduction—The First Portrait of Climate Obstruction across Europe. I R. J. Brulle, M. C. Spencer, & J. T. Roberts (Red.), Climate Obstruction across Europe (1. utg., s. 1–25). University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197762042.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  304. Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods (3. utg.). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  305. Bufdir. (2023). Politikk og kjønn | Bufdir. https://www.bufdir.no/statistikk-og-analyse/kjonnslikestilling/politikk-kjonn/#section-490 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  306. Carian, E. K., & Sobotka, T. C. (2018). Playing the Trump Card: Masculinity Threat and the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 4, 2378023117740699. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117740699 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  307. Clifford, J., Marcus, G. E., & School of American Research. (2010). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (25th anniversary edition with a foreword by Kim Fortun.). University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  308. Cohen, S. (2013). States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  309. Connell, R. W. (2020). Masculinities (2. utg.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116479 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  310. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  311. Delin, L. (2023). The Complexity of Climate Positions of Right-wing Populist Parties in Europe. Social Science, Humanities and Sustainability Research, 4(4), p81. https://doi.org/10.22158/sshsr.v4n4p81 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  312. Egge, J. H. (2025, august 11). Gutter i niende klasse er skeptiske til at menn og kvinner skal ha like rettigheter. NRK. https://www.nrk.no/trondelag/gutter-i-niende-klasse-er-skeptiske-til-at-menn-og-kvinner-skal-ha-like-rettigheter-1.17453728 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  313. Evergeti, V. (2004). Building trust through social capital in the field: Reflections from an ethnography in minority communities in Greece. I R. Edwards (Red.), Social capital in the field: Researchers’ Tales. South Bank University (s. 41–46). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  314. Feygina, I. (2021). Social psychological drivers of climate change denial. I F. J. Carrillo & G. Koch (Red.), Knowledge For The Anthropocene. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://china.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800884281/9781800884281.00013.xml Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  315. Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of “System-Sanctioned Change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  316. Fjellheim, E. M. (2023). Wind Energy on Trial in Saepmie: Epistemic Controversies and Strategic Ignorance in Norway’s Green Energy Transition: Arctic Review on Law & Politics. Arctic Review on Law & Politics, 14, 140–168. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v14.5586 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  317. Flemmen, M., Hjellbrekke, J., Hovden, J. F., & Jarness, V. (2022). Stability, transformation, and escalation: Norwegian classes and class boundaries 2008–2020. I Class Boundaries in Europe. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  318. Fuist, T. N. (2014). The Dramatization of Beliefs, Values, and Allegiances: Ideological Performances Among Social Movement Groups and Religious Organizations. Social Movement Studies, 13(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.832189 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  319. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2010). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3. ed., reprinted). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  320. Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  321. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2016). Narrative practice and the active interview. I D. Silverman (Red.), Qualitative research (4th ed., s. 67–82). Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  322. Hystad, J., & Lystad, E. (2025, juli 17). Likestilling og rasisme: — Deler av høyresiden har fyrt opp under. https://www.khrono.no/hver-tredje-student-vil-begrense-temaer-som-likestilling-lhbt-og-rasisme-i-undervisningen/983836 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  323. Iossifidis, M. J. M. (2024). Ecofascism, far-right ecologism, and neo-Malthusianism. I A. Vaughan, J. Braune, M. Tinsley, & A. Mondon (Red.), The ethics of researching the far right: Critical approaches and reflections (s. 57–74). Manchester University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  324. Jylhä, K. M., Cantal, C., Akrami, N., & Milfont, T. L. (2016). Denial of anthropogenic climate change: Social dominance orientation helps explain the conservative male effect in Brazil and Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  325. Jylhä, K. M., Strimling, P., & Rydgren, J. (2019). Climate change denial among radical right-wing supporters. https://doi.org/10.17045/STHLMUNI.10007582.V1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  326. Keller, J. (2021). “This is oil country:” mediated transnational girlhood, Greta Thunberg, and patriarchal petrocultures. Feminist Media Studies, 21(4), 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1919729 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  327. Kidder, J. L. (2018). Civil and uncivil places: The moral geography of College Republicans. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 6(1), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-016-0023-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  328. Kimmel, M. (2019). Angry white men: American masculinity at the end of an era (Third Trade paperback edition). Bold Type Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  329. Krange, O., Kaltenborn, B. P., & Hultman, M. (2019). Cool dudes in Norway: Climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men. Environmental Sociology, 5(1), Artikkel 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1488516 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  330. Krick, E., & Holst, C. (2019). 7 Committee Governance in Consensus Cultures: An Exploration of Best Practice Cases in Germany and Norway. I 7 Committee Governance in Consensus Cultures: An Exploration of Best Practice Cases in Germany and Norway (s. 151–174). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  331. De Gruyter Open Poland. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110634082-008/html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  332. Lamont, M., & Swidler, A. (2014). Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing. Qualitative Sociology, 37(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  333. Ljunggren, J. (2017). Elitist Egalitarianism: Negotiating Identity in the Norwegian Cultural Elite. Sociology, 51(3), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515590755 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  334. Mangset, M. (2015). What Does it Mean to be Part of the Elite? https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341343 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  335. Manning, N., & Stefanovic, D. (2024). Beyond Angry White Men: A progressive sociological imagination as an alternative to aggrieved entitlement. Journal of Youth Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2024.2370280 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  336. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Organized Climate Change Denial. I J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Red.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (s. 144–160). OUP Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  337. Moore, S., & Roberts, A. (2022). The Rise of Ecofascism: Climate Change and the Far Right. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  338. Mósesdóttir, L. (2024). Energy (in)justice in the green energy transition. The case of Fosen wind farms in Norway. Technology in Society, 77, 102563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102563 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  339. Mosher, D. L., & Tomkins, S. S. (1988). Scripting the macho man: Hypermasculine socialization and enculturation. The Journal of Sex Research, 25(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551445 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  340. Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  341. Norgaard, K. M. (2012). Climate Denial and the Construction of Innocence: Reproducing Transnational Environmental Privilege in the Face of Climate Change. Race, Gender & Class, 19(1/2), 80–103. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  342. Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Bernard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The Fundations of Qualitative Research. I J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Red.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (Second edition, s. 1–26). Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  343. Oswald, M. T., Fromm, M., & Broda, E. (2021). Strategic clustering in right-wing-populism? ‘Green policies’ in Germany and France. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00485-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  344. Rahmstorf, S. (2004). The climate sceptics. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/843459669/Rahmstorf-Climate-Sceptics-2004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  345. Remsö, A., Bäck, H., & Aurora Renström, E. (2024). Gender differences in climate change denial in Sweden: The role of threatened masculinity. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1450230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450230 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  346. Renström, E., & Bäck, H. (2024). Manfluencers and Young Men’s Misogynistic Attitudes: The Role of Perceived Threats to Men’s Status. Sex Roles, 90, 1787–1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01538-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  347. Revisorforeningen. (2025). Krav til kjønnsbalanse i norske styrer. Den norske Revisorforeningen. https://www.revisorforeningen.no:443/fag/nyheter/krav-til-kjonnsbalanse-i-norske-styrer/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  348. Rome, A. (2006). «Political Hermaphrodites»: Gender and Environmental Reform in Progressive America. Environmental History, 11(3), 440–463. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  349. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  350. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (Fourth edition). SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  351. Sandvik, H. (2008). Public concern over global warming correlates negatively with national wealth. Climatic Change, 90(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9429-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  352. Selk, V., & Kemmerzell, J. (2022). Retrogradism in context. Varieties of right-wing populist climate politics. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1999150 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  353. Statsministerens kontor. (2026). Norges statsministre [Tidslinje]. regjeringen.no. Regjeringen.no. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dep/smk/ansvarsomrader/norgesstatsministre/id747985/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  354. Stephens, J. C. (2024). The dangers of masculine technological optimism: Why feminist, antiracist values are essential for social justice, economic justice, and climate justice. Environmental Values, 33(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/09632719231208752 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  355. Sælen, H. G., & Aasen, M. (2023). Exploring public opposition and support across different climate policies: Poles apart? Ecological Economics, 209, 107838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107838 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  356. Sæther, A. K. (2017). De beste intensjoner: Oljelandet i klimakampen (1. utgave). Cappelen Damm. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  357. Tebaldi, C., & Jereza, R. (2024). Ethnographic empathy and research ethics as methodological whiteness. I A. Vaughan, J. Braune, M. Tinsley, & A. Mondon (Red.), The ethics of researching the far right: Critical approaches and reflections (s. 106–120). Manchester University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  358. Tranter, B., & Booth, K. (2015). Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change, 33, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  359. Van Rensburg, W. (2015). Climate Change Scepticism: A Conceptual Re-Evaluation. Sage Open, 5(2), 2158244015579723. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015579723 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  360. Vokey, M., Tefft, B., & Tysiaczny, C. (2013). An Analysis of Hyper-Masculinity in Magazine Advertisements. Sex Roles, 68(9), 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0268-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  361. Vowles, K., & Hultman, M. (2021). Dead White men vs. Greta Thunberg: Nationalism, Misogyny, and Climate Change Denial in Swedish far-right Digital Media. Australian Feminist Studies, 36(110), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2022.2062669 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  362. Wagner, E. (2024). Performing Conservative Politics. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 08912416241309853. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416241309853 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  363. Wilkinson, S. (2016). Analysing Focus Group Data. I D. Silverman (Red.), Qualitative research (4th ed., s. 83–99). Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-84
  364. Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1998). The role of narratives in consumer information pro-cessing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 207–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0703_01 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  365. Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  366. Alonso, A., Ciccia, R., & Lombardo, E. (2023). A Southern European model? Gender re-gime change in Italy and Spain. Women’s Studies International Forum, 98, 102737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102737 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  367. Andrade, F.C., Hoyle, R.H., Burnell, K. (2023). Adjusting to the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States: The impact of disruptions on habits and changes in health behaviors. Jour-nal of Health Psychology. 28(14):1307–1319. doi:10.1177/13591053221144440 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  368. Angus, S. (2024). Tracking Public Narratives of Democratic Resilience at Scale: From ex-perts and machines, to the transformer revolution. Australian Resilient Democracy Re-search and Data Network Discussion Paper 3, Australian National University. https://polis.cass.anu.edu.au/files/docs/2025/6/Resilient-Democracy---Discussion-Paper-03.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  369. Argyle, L. P., Busby, E. C., Fulda, N., Gubler, J. R., Rytting, C., & Wingate, D. (2023). Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples. Political Analy-sis, 31(3), 337–351. doi:10.1017/pan.2023.2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  370. Bail, C. A. (2024). Can Generative AI improve social science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(21), e2314021121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314021121 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  371. Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham: Duke University Press Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  372. Boym, S. (2001). The future of nostalgia. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  373. Brady, W.J., Wills, J.A., Jost, J.T., Tucker, J.A. & Van Bavel, J.J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114 (28) 7313–7318, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  374. Breakwell, G. M., & Jaspal, R. (2020). Identity change, uncertainty and mistrust in relation to fear and risk of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 24(3–4), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1864011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  375. Butler, J. (2015). Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  376. Calhoun, C. (1994). Social theory and the politics of identity. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA. : Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  377. Camponeschi, C. (2022). Integrative resilience in action: Stories from the frontlines of cli-mate change and the Covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 4:933501. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2022.933501 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  378. Carastathis, A. (2013). Identity categories as potential coalitions. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 941–965. https://doi.org/10.1086/669573 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  379. Chae, Y., & Davidson, T. (2025). Large Language Models for Text Classification: From Ze-ro-Shot Learning to Instruction-Tuning. Sociological Methods & Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251325243 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  380. Chen, B., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025). Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models. Patterns, 6(6), 101260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  381. Divon, T., Are, C., & Briggs, P. (2025). Platform gaslighting: A user-centric insight into so-cial media corporate communications of content moderation. Platforms & Society, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/29768624241303109 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  382. Edwards, L., Philip, F., & Gerrard, Y. (2020). Communicating feminist politics? The double-edged sword of using social media in a feminist organisation. Feminist Media Stu-dies, 20(5), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1599036 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  383. Elgenius, G., & Rydgren, J. (2018). Frames of nostalgia and belonging: the resurgence of ethno-nationalism in Sweden. European Societies, 21(4), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494297 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  384. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  385. European Institute for Gender Equality. (2021). Gender Equality Index 2021. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  386. Evans, E., & Bussey-Chamberlain, P. (2021). The problems with feminist nostalgia: Inter-sectionality and white popular feminism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 28(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068211032058 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  387. Farris, S. R. (2017). In the Name of Women’s Rights. The Rise of Femonationalism. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  388. Facebook. (2020, November 19). Community Standards Enforcement Report, November 2020. Facebook Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2020/11/community-standards-enforcement-report-nov-2020/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  389. Freelon, D., Marwick, A., & Kreiss, D. (2020). False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right. Science, 369(6508), 1197–1201. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2428 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  390. Ganesh, B., & Froio, C. (2020). A “Europe des Nations”: far right imaginative geographies and the politicization of cultural crisis on Twitter in Western Europe. Journal of European Integration, 42(5), 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1792462 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  391. Gerrand, V., Ging, D., Roose, J. M., & Flood, M. (2025). Mapping the Neo-Manosphere(s): New Directions for Research. Men and Masculinities, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X251350277 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  392. Ging, D., & Siapera, E. (Eds.). (2019). Gender hate online: Understanding the new anti-feminism. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  393. Gkeredakis, M., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Barrett, M. (2021). Crisis as opportunity, disruption and exposure: Exploring emergent responses to crisis through digital technology. Infor-mation and Organization, 31(1), 100344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100344 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  394. Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2015). Embodied Harms: Gender, Shame, and Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence. Violence Against Women, 21(6), 758–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215576581 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  395. Holdo, M. (2025). Caring for Democracy: Feminist Ethics and Radical Democratic Spac-es. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 21(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.1632 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  396. Hogg, M. A., & Grieve, P. (1999). Social identity theory and the crisis of confidence in social psychology: A commentary, and some research on uncertainty reduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00027 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  397. Hogg, M. A., & Gaffney, A. M. (2023). Social identity dynamics in the face of overwhelming uncertainty. In J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano, & K. Fiedler (Eds.), The psychology of insecurity: Seeking certainty where none can be found (pp. 244–264). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003317623-17 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  398. Horta Ribeiro, M., Blackburn, J., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., Long, S., Greenberg, S., & Zannettou, S. (2021). The Evolution of the Manosphere across the Web. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15(1), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18053 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  399. Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2010). When Do Governments Promote Women’s Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 207–216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25698527 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  400. Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. John F. Kennedy School of Government of Harvard Uni-versity Working Paper No. RWP16–026, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2818659 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  401. Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  402. Jiang, A.Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., Bamford, C., Chaplot, D.S., Casas, D., Bressand, F., Lengyel, G., Lample, G., Saulnier, L. (2023). Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  403. Johnson, C., & Williams, B. (2020). Gender and Political Leadership in a Time of COVID. Politics & Gender, 16(4), 943–950. doi:10.1017/S1743923X2000029X Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  404. Kelleher, S., Murphy, M. & Su, X. (2022). Asexual identity development and internalisation: a scoping review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychology and Sexuality, 14(1), pp.45 – 72. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2022.2057867 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  405. Kern, L. (2021). Stories we tell. Dialogues in Human Geography, 11(1), 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820621995629 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  406. Kinnvall, C., & Mitzen, J. (2018). Ontological security and conflict: The dynamics of crisis and the constitution of community. Journal of International Relations and Develop-ment, 21(4), 825–835. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  407. Koenig, B. (2024). Exploring the Pathway of Far-Right Radicalization in the Age of Neolib-eralism. Kroc IPJ Research and Resources. 104. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  408. https://digital.sandiego.edu/ipj-research/104 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  409. Korolczuk, E., & Graff, A. (2018). Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The anticolonial frame and the rise of illiberal populism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1086/696691 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  410. Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., Clark, E. M., O'Keefe, D. J., Erwin, D. O., Holmes, K., Hinyard, L. J., Houston, T., & Woolley, S. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879904 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  411. Labio-Bernal, A., & Manzano-Zambruno, L. (2023). 8M Demonstrations, the Spanish Far Right, and the Pandemic in a Hybrid Media System. Media and Communication, 11(1), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.5991 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  412. Lacalle, C., Gómez-Morales, B., & Vicent-Ibáñez, M. (2023). Misogyny and the construction of toxic masculinity in the Spanish Manosphere (Burbuja.info). Profesional De La infor-mación, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.15 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  413. Levi, M. (2025). Expanding the Community of Fate by Expanding the Community of Care. Daedalus. 154. 240–250. 10.1162/daed_a_02135 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  414. Lindsay, A. (2022). Swallowing the black pill: Involuntary celibates’ (Incels) anti-feminism within digital society. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 11(1), [210]-224. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.379622488850885 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  415. Lombardo, E., & Bustelo, M. (2012). Political approaches to inequalities in Southern Eu-rope: A comparative analysis of Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19(4), 572–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  416. Lugones, M. (2003). Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing Coalition Against Multiple Op-pressions. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  417. Majumdar, S., & Tewatia, M. (2024). Embodied Uncertainty and COVID-19: Social identity, stigma, trust and coping through the pandemic. Journal of Risk Research, 27(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2340021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  418. Martinsson, L., & Ericson, M. (2023). ‘Fight pandemics with protective masks or gender?’ Emerging collective identities and anti-gender movements on Twitter during the COVID-19 crisis in Sweden. Feminist Media Studies, 23(5), 2011–2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.2009898 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  419. Mathieu, E., Ritchie, H., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Gavrilov, D., Giattino, C., Hasell, J., Macdonald, B., Dattani, S., Beltekian, D., Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Roser, M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  420. Mercer, J. (2014). Feeling like a state: social emotion and identity. International Theo-ry, 6(3), 515–535. doi:10.1017/S1752971914000244 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  421. Meta. (2024). Meta transparency report 2024 (Report). https://transparency.meta.com/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  422. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  423. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  424. Nabi, R. L., & Green, M. C. (2015). The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychology, 18(2), 137–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912585 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  425. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  426. Osuna, J. J. O., & Rama, J. (2021). COVID-19: A Political Virus? VOX’s Populist Discourse in Times of Crisis. Frontiers in Political Science, Volume 3–2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.678526 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  427. Pain, P. (2020). “It took me quite a long time to develop a voice”: Examining feminist digital activism in the Indian #MeToo movement. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3139–3155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820944846 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  428. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  429. Power, K. (2020). The Covid-19 Pandemic Has Increased the Care Burden of Women and Families. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16, 67–73. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1776561 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  431. Primig, F. (2025). The epistemic crisis and the rise of the far right: toward a conceptualization of counter-knowledge orders in digital knowledge socie-ty. Publizistik 70, 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-025-00887-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  432. Quéré, L. (2021). Feminist collective memory and nostalgia in gynaecological self-help in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 28(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068211029980 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  433. Ramis-Moyano, R., Pasadas-del-Amo, S., & Font, J. (2023). Not only a territorial matter: The electoral surge of VOX and the anti-libertarian reaction. PLOS ONE 18(4): e0283852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283852 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  434. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  435. Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. So-cial Science Information, 56(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  436. Sapiro, G. (2022). Structural crises vs. situations of (political) crisis. Rassegna italiana di Sociologia, LXIII (2), pp.299 – 321. 10.1423/104930 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  437. Schöne, J. P., Garcia, D., Parkinson, B., & Goldenberg, A. (2023). Negative expressions are shared more on Twitter for public figures than for ordinary users. PNAS nexus, 2(7), pgad219. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad219 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  438. Smith, J., Davies, S. E., Feng, H., Gan, C. C. R., Grépin, K. A., Harman, S., Herten-Crabb, A., Morgan, R., Vandan, N., & Wenham, C. (2021). More than a public health crisis: A fem-inist political economic analysis of COVID-19. Global Public Health, 16(8–9), 1364–1380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1896765 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  439. Somers, M. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network ap-proach. Theory and Society, 23, 605–650. doi:10.1007/BF00992905 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  440. Sugiura, L. (2021). The Incel Rebellion: The Rise of the Manosphere and the Virtual War Against Women. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-254-420211004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  441. Tilly, C. (2002). Stories, identities and political change. Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  442. Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2023). White supremacists anonymous: how digital media emotionally energize far-right movements. Journal of Information Technology & Poli-tics, 22(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2262459 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  443. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Psychol-ogy Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  444. Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New. York: New York University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  445. Tufekci, Z. (2018). Twitter and tear gas. Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  446. Van Bavel, J. J., Robertson, C. E., del Rosario, K., Rasmussen, J., & Rathje, S. (2024). Social Media and Morality. In Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 75, Issue Volume 75, 2024, pp. 311–340). Annual Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-110258 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  447. van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford Academic https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  448. Wajcman, J. (2007). From Women And Technology To Gendered Technosci-ence. Information, Communication & Society, 10(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701409770 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  449. Weinhardt, C., Fegert, J., Hinz, O., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2024). Digital Democracy: A Wake-Up Call. Bus Inf Syst Eng 66, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-024-00862-x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  450. White, H. C. (2008). Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  451. Wimmer, A. (2002). Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  452. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Women, Citizenship and Difference. Feminist Review, 57(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/014177897339632 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-105
  453. Abou-Chadi, T., Breyer, M. & Gessler, T. (2021). The (Re)politicisation of Gender in Western Europe. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 4(2), 311–314. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  454. Ahrens, P., Ayoub, P. M. & Lang, S. (2022). Leading from Behind? Gender Equality in Germany During the Merkel Era. German Politics, 31(1), 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  455. Akkerman, T. (2015). Gender and the Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Agendas. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 37–60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  456. Allen, T. J. & Goodman, S. W. (2021). Individual- and Party-Level Determinants of Far-Right Support Among Women in Western Europe. European Political Science Review, 13(2), 135–150. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  457. Anduiza, E. & Rico, G. (2024). Sexism and the Far‐Right Vote: The Individual Dynamics of Gender Backlash. American Journal of Political Science, 68(2), 478–493. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  458. Beckwith, K. (2000). Beyond Compare? Women’s Movements in Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 37(4), 431–468. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  459. Bernardez-Rodal, A., Requeijo Rey, P. & Franco, Y. G. (2022). Radical Right Parties and Anti-Feminist Speech on Instagram: Vox and the 2019 Spanish General Election. Party Politics, 28(2), 272–283. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  460. Bornschier S. (2010). Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  461. Bornschier, S., Häusermann, S., Zollinger, D. & Colombo, C. (2021). How “Us” and “Them” Relates to Voting Behavior: Social Structure, Social Identities, and Electoral Choice. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2087–2122. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  462. Breyer, M. (2024). Backlash or Progressive Mobilization? Voter Reactions to Perceived Trajectories of Women’s Representation. Comparative Political Studies, 57(13), 2193–2224. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  463. Butler, J. (2024). Who’s Afraid of Gender? New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  464. Pérez, L. C., de Oger, S. A. S. & Fortes, B. G. (2023). Ideology and Party Positions on Gender Issues in Spain: Evidence from a Novel Data Set. Politics & Gender, 19(4), 1204–1230. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  465. Campbell, A., Coverse, P. E., Miller, W. E. & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  466. Campbell, R. & Erzeel, S. (2018). Exploring Gender Differences in Support for Rightist Parties: The Role of Party and Gender Ideology. Politics & Gender, 14(1), 80–105. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  467. Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  468. Cassese, E. C. & Barnes, T. D. (2019). Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races. Political Behavior, 41, 677–700. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  469. Christley, O. R. (2022). Traditional Gender Attitudes, Nativism, and Support for the Radical Right. Politics & Gender, 18(4), 1141–1167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  470. Clayton, A., O’Brien, D. Z. & Piscopo, J. M. (2019). All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 113–129. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  471. De Lange, S. & Mügge, L. (2015). Gender and Right-Wing Populism in the Low Countries: Ideological Variations Across Parties and Time. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 61–80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  472. Dietz, M. & Roßteutscher, S. (2025). Contested Terrain. How Attitudes toward Gender Issues Shape Voting Behavior in Germany. Annual Conference of the German Political Science Association, Research Group “Elections and Political Attitudes” 2025 in Berlin, Germany, 19. September 2025. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  473. Dietze, G. & Roth J. (2020). Right-Wing Populism and Gender. European Perspectives and Beyond. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  474. European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2024). Gender Equality Index 2024: Sustaining Momentum on a Fragile Path. Retrieved from: Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  475. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index (last accessed: 2025, September 25). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  476. Erel, U. (2018). Saving and Reproducing the Nation: Struggles Around Right-wing Politics of Social Reproduction, Gender and Race in Austerity Europe. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68, 173–182. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  477. Farris, S. R. (2017). In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  478. Flood, M., Dragiewicz, M., & Pease, B. (2021). Resistance and backlash to gender equality. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 393–408. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  479. Fortin-Rittberger, J. & Eder, C. (2025). Disentangling different types of sexist attitudes and vote choice in Germany. Political Research Exchange, 7(1), 2508382. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  480. Fraser, N. (1995). Recognition or Redistribution? A Critical Reading of Iris Young’s Justice and the Politics of Difference. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 3(2), 166–180. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  481. Gaweda, B., Siddi, M. & Miller, C. (2023). What’s in a Name? Gender Equality and the European Conservatives and Reformists’ Group in the European Parliament. Party Politics, 29(5), 829–839. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  482. Gest, J., Reny, T. & Mayer, J. (2018). Roots of the Radical Right: Nostalgic Deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1694–1719. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  483. de Geus, R., Ralph-Morrow, E. & Shorrocks, R. (2022). Understanding Ambivalent Sexism and its Relationship with Electoral Choice in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 1564–1583. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  484. Green, J. & Shorrocks, R. (2023). The Gender Backlash in the Vote for Brexit. Political Behavior, 45(1), 347–371. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  485. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes toward Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  486. Graff, A. & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  487. Gwiazda A. (2023). Gender Ideologies and Polish Political Parties. Government and Opposition, 58(4), 641–660. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  488. Hark, S. & Villa, P. (2015). Anti-Genderismus. Sexualität und Geschlecht als Schauplätze aktueller politischer Auseinandersetzungen. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  489. Henninger, A. & von Wahl, A. (2014). Grand Coalition and Multi-Party Competition: Explaining Slowing Reforms in Gender Policy in Germany (2009–13). German Politics, 23(4), 386–399. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  490. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  491. Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  492. Hunklinger, M., & Ferch, N. (2020). Trans* voting: demand and supply side of trans* politics in Germany. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 3(3), 389–408. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  493. Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  494. Ignazi, P. (1992). The Silent Counter‐Revolution: Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right‐Wing Parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22(1), 3–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  495. Ignazi, P. (2003). Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  496. ILGA-Europe. (2023). Rainbow Map 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.ilga-europe.org/report/rainbow-europe-2023/ (last accessed: 2025, September 25). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  497. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  498. Inglehart, R. & Norris, P. (2003). Rising Tide. Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  499. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O. & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social Inequality and the Reduction of Ideological Dissonance on Behalf of the System: Evidence of Enhanced System Justification among the Disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  500. Kantola, J. & Lombardo, E. (2017). Feminist Political Analysis: Exploring Strengths, Hegemonies and Limitations. Feminist Theory, 18(3), 323–341. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  501. Kehn, A. & Ruthig, J. C. (2013). Perceptions of Gender Discrimination across Six Decades: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Age. Sex roles, 69, 289–296. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  502. Kimmel, M. (2017). Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York, NY: Bold Type Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  503. Kuhar, R. & Paternotte, D. (2017). Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  504. Knuckey, J. (2019). “I just don’t think she has a Presidential Look”: Sexism and Vote Choice in the 2016 Election. Social Science Quarterly, 100(1), 342–358. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  505. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S. & Wüest, B. (2012). Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  506. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. & Frey, T. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  507. Lancaster, C. M. (2020). Not So Radical After All: Ideological Diversity Among Radical Right Supporters and Its Implications. Political Studies, 68(3), 600–616. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  508. Lavizzari, A. & Pirro, A. L. (2024). The Gender Politics of Populist Parties in Southern Europe. West European Politics, 47(7), 1473–1502. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  509. Magni, G. (2019). LGBTI Issues and Representation in the 2019 European Elections. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 2(3), 421–423. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  510. Mansbridge, J. & Shames, S. L. (2008). Toward a Theory of Backlash: Dynamic Resistance and the Central Role of Power. Politics & Gender, 4(4), 623–634. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  511. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Nelson, M. & Edwards, E. (2006). Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 155–175. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  512. Mathisen, R. B. (2025). Growing Apart: Ideological Polarization between Teenage Boys and Girls. OSF Working Paper. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  513. Meret S. & Siim B. (2013). Gender, Populism and Politics of Belonging: Discourses of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Denmark, Norway and Austria. In: Siim B. & Mokre M. (eds.) Negotiating Gender and Diversity in an Emergent European Public Sphere (78–96). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  514. Milosav, Ð., Dickson, Z., Hobolt, S. B., Klüver, H., Kuhn, T. & Rodon, T. (2026). The Youth Gender Gap in Support for the Far Right. Journal of European Public Policy, 33(2), 444–468. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  515. Murib, Z. (2025). Gender Ideology, the Far Right, and LGBTQ Politics. Political Science & Politics, January, 1–6. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  516. Mutz, D. C. (2018). Status Threat, not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4330–E4339. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  517. Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  518. Off, G. (2023). Gender Equality Salience, Backlash and Radical Right Voting in the Gender-Equal Context of Sweden. West European Politics, 46(3), 451–476. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  519. Otteni, C. (2025a). From empowerment to participation: How women’s political empowerment shapes non-institutionalized political participation and reduces gender disparities. International Political Science Review, 01925121251357720. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  520. Otteni, C. (2025b). Polarized Equality? Ideological and Affective Divides Over Gender Equality in Europe. Social Science Quarterly, 106(7), e70120. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  521. Paternotte, D. & Kuhar, R. (2018) Disentangling and Locating the “Global Right”: Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 6–19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  522. Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  523. Reinhardt S., Heft A. & Pavan E. (2024). Varieties of Antigenderism: The Politicization of Gender Issues Across Three European Populist Radical Right Parties. Information, Communication & Society, 27(7), 1273–1294. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  524. Richardson, D. (2015). Rethinking Sexual Citizenship. Sociology, 51(2), 208–224. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  525. Rydgren, J. (2013). Class Politics and the Radical Right (Vol. 16). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  526. Sass, K. & Kuhnle, S. (2023). The Gender Cleavage: Updating Rokkanian Theory for the Twenty-First Century. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 30(1), 188–210. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  527. Sauer, B. (2017). Gesellschaftstheoretische Überlegungen zum Europäischen Rechtspopulismus. Zum Erklärungspotential der Kategorie Geschlecht. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 58(1), 3–22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  528. Sauer, B., Kuhar, R., Ajanović E. & Saarinen, A. (2016). Exclusive Intersections. Constructions of Gender and Sexuality. In G. Lazaridis & G. Campani (eds.), Understanding the Populist Shift: Othering in a Europe in Crisis. London: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  529. Schotel, A. L. & Mügge L. (2024). Politics without Presence? The Symbolic Representation of Trans People in Germany and the Netherlands. Politics & Gender, 20(4), 788–813. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  530. Siegel, S. & Wang, Y. A. (2018). Broken Rainbows: The Partisan Politics of Marriage Equality in Europe. European Politics and Society, 19(4), 377–395. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  531. Spierings, N. (2020). Why Gender and Sexuality Are Both Trivial and Pivotal in Populist Radical Right Parties. In: Dietze G. & Roth J. (eds), Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond (41–58). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  532. Spierings N., Lubbers M. & Zaslove A. (2017). Sexually Modern Nativist Voters: Do They Exist and Do They Vote for the Populist Radical Right? Gender and Education, 29(2), 216–237. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  533. Swim, J. K. & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, Covert, and Subtle Sexism: A Comparison Between the Attitudes Toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 103–118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  534. Swim, J. K. & Hyers, L. L. (2009). Sexism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (407–430). New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  535. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S. & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and Racism: Old-Fashioned and Modern Prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  536. Tremblay M. & Paternotte, D. (2011). The Lesbian and Gay Movement and the State: Comparative Insights into a Transformed Relationship. London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  537. Valentino, N. A., Wayne, C. & Oceno, M. (2018). Mobilizing Sexism: The Interaction of Emotion and Gender Attitudes in the 2016 US Presidential Election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 799–821. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  538. van der Eijk, C. (2001). Measuring Agreement in Ordered Rating Scales. Quality and Quantity 35: 325–341. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  539. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem). (2025). Graphing Tool. Retrieved from: https://v-dem.net/data_analysis/VariableGraph/ (last accessed: 2025, September 25). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  540. Wallaschek, S., Verbalyte, M. & Eigmüller, M. (2024). Cleavage Theory Meets Gender Equality: Examining Party Positions in Germany. European Politics and Society, 25(5), 809–826. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  541. Weeks, A. C., Caravantes, P. Espírito-Santo, A., Lombardo, E., Stratigaki, M. & Gul, S. (2024). When is Gender on Party Agendas? Manifestos and (De-)democratisation in Greece, Portugal, and Spain. South European Society and Politics, 1–33. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-133
  542. Abou-Chadi, T., Breyer, M., & Gessler, T. (2021). The (re)politicisation of gender in Western Europe. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 4(2), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16177312096679 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  543. Alexander, A. C., & Off, G. (2025). Attitudes toward Political Authoritarianism in Economically Advanced Democracies: The Role of Gender Values and Norms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009374309 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  544. Anderson, C. J., Bol, D., & Ananda, A. (2022). Humanity’s Attitudes about Democracy and Political Leaders. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(4), 957–986. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab056 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  545. Anduiza, E., & Off, G. (2026). Perceptions of Feminism as a Threat. Politics & Gender, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X26100592 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  546. Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., & Sauer, C. (2017). Why Should Women Get Less? Evidence on the Gender Pay Gap from Multifactorial Survey Experiments. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416683393 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  547. Bail, C. A. (2021). Breaking the social media prism: How to make our platforms less polarizing. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  548. Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  549. Barberá, P. (2020). Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Eds), Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform (pp. 34–55). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  550. Baym, N. K., & Boyd, D. (2012). Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705200 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  551. Bernhard, R., Shames, S., & Teele, D. L. (2021). To Emerge? Breadwinning, Motherhood, and Women’s Decisions to Run for Office. American Political Science Review, 115(2), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000970 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  552. Blais, M., & Dupuis-Déri, F. (2012). Masculinism and the Antifeminist Countermovement. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.640532 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  553. Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759–789. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  554. Bornschier, S., Häusermann, S., Zollinger, D., & Colombo, C. (2021). How “Us” and “Them” Relates to Voting Behavior—Social Structure, Social Identities, and Electoral Choice. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2087–2122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997504 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  555. Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017). Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40), 10612–10617. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706588114 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  556. boyd, D. M. (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  557. Chafetz, J. S., & Dworkin, A. G. (1987). IN THE FACE OF THREAT: Organized Antifeminism in Comparative Perspective. Gender & Society, 1(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124387001001003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  558. Chen, A. Y., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2023). Subscriptions and external links help drive resentful users to alternative and extremist YouTube channels. Science Advances, 9(35), eadd8080. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add8080 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  559. Chen, G. M., Pain, P., Chen, V. Y., Mekelburg, M., Springer, N., & Troger, F. (2020). ‘You really have to have a thick skin’: A cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists. Journalism, 21(7), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918768500 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  560. Conlin, S. E., & Heesacker, M. (2018). The Association between Feminist Self-Labeling and Gender Equality Activism: Exploring the Effects of Scale Language and Identity Priming. Current Psychology, 37(1), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9517-0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  561. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments: Editorial. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  562. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2020). Media and the Social Construction of Reality. In D. A. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology (pp. 27–39). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  563. Dahlum, S., Hanson, T., Johnsen, Å., Kotsadam, A., & Wuttke, A. (2024). Is Support for Authoritarian Rule Contagious? Evidence from Field and Survey Experiments. https://www.ifo.de/en/cesifo/publications/2024/working-paper/support-authoritarian-rule-contagious-evidence-field-and-survey Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  564. de Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., Merkel, W., Strijbs, O., & Zürn, M. (Eds). (2019). The struggle over borders: Cosmopolitanism and communitarianism. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  565. Díaz Fernández, S., García Mingo, E., & Fuentes, A. (2023). #TeamAlienadas: Anti-feminist ideologic work in the Spanish manosphere. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 30(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068231173261 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  566. Dietz, M. M., & Roßteutscher, S. (2024). Different Colors of the Same Rainbow? The Polarization of Gender Issues and its Campaign Potential. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/27qyt Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  567. Díez-Medrano, J., Sojka, A., Kaushik, K., Trenz, H.-J., Eigmüller, M., Verbalyte, M., & Wallaschek, S. (2024). Value Conflicts in a Differentiated Europe: The Impact of Digital Media on Value Polarisation in Europe (ValCon) (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. GESIS. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14286 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  568. Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  569. Duncan, L. E., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1997). Authoritarianism and Gender Roles: Toward a Psychological Analysis of Hegemonic Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297231005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  570. Eady, G., Nagler, J., Guess, A., Zilinsky, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). How many people live in political bubbles on social media? Evidence from linked survey and Twitter data. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832705 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  571. Eigmüller, M., & Trenz, H.-J. (2020). Werte und Wertekonflikte in einer differenzierten EU. In A. Grimmel (Ed.), Die neue Europäische Union: Zwischen Integration und Desintegration (pp. 33–56). Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  572. Elder, L., Greene, S., & Lizotte, M.-K. (2021). Feminist and Anti-Feminist Identification in the 21 st Century United States. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 42(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1929607 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  573. Esposito, E., & Breeze, R. (2022). Gender and politics in a digitalised world: Investigating online hostility against UK female MPs. Discourse & Society, 33(3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221076608 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  574. Eurostat. (2024, March 19). 59 % of EU individuals using social networks in 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240319-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  575. Evans, J. H. (2003). Have Americans’ Attitudes Become More Polarized? An Update. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8401005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  576. Feezell, J. T., Wagner, J. K., & Conroy, M. (2021). Exploring the effects of algorithm-driven news sources on political behavior and polarization. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106626 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  577. Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00316 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  578. Frischlich, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Boberg, S., & Wintterlin, F. (2021). Roots of Incivility: How Personality, Media Use, and Online Experiences Shape Uncivil Participation. Media and Communication, 9(1), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3360 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  579. Gattig, A., & Minkus, L. (2021). Does Marriage Increase Couples’ Life Satisfaction?: Evidence Using Panel Data and Fixed-effects Individual Slopes. Comparative Population Studies, 46. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2021-05 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  580. Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  581. Gwiazda, A. (2023). Gender Ideologies and Polish Political Parties. Government and Opposition, 58(4), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.57 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  582. Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  583. Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  584. IPSOS. (n.d.). Www.ipsos.com. Retrieved 16 June 2025, from https://www.ipsos.com/en Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  585. Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  586. Jakob, J., Dobbrick, T., Freudenthaler, R., Haffner, P., & Wessler, H. (2023). Is Constructive Engagement Online a Lost Cause? Toxic Outrage in Online User Comments Across Democratic Political Systems and Discussion Arenas. Communication Research, 50(4), 508–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211062773 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  587. Jungherr, A., Rivero Rodríguez, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020). Retooling politics: How digital media are shaping democracy. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  588. Kim, J. W., Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). The Distorting Prism of Social Media: How Self-Selection and Exposure to Incivility Fuel Online Comment Toxicity. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  589. Kittilson, M. C. (2013). Party Politics (Online Publication). In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  590. Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Baden, C., & Yarchi, M. (2020). Interpretative Polarization across Platforms: How Political Disagreement Develops Over Time on Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120944393 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  591. Knight, C. R., & Brinton, M. C. (2017). One Egalitarianism or Several? Two Decades of Gender-Role Attitude Change in Europe. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1485–1532. https://doi.org/10.1086/689814 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  592. Knüpfer, C., Hoffmann, M., & Voskresenskii, V. (2022). Hijacking MeToo: Transnational dynamics and networked frame contestation on the far right in the case of the ‘120 decibels’ campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1822904 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  593. Korolczuk, E., & Graff, A. (2018). Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1086/696691 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  594. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., & Wüest, B. (Eds). (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  595. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds). (2018). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  596. Lombardo, E., Caravantes, P., & Díaz Fernández, S. (2025). ‘Stop torpedoing women’s rights!’: Feminist institutional responses to anti-gender politics in Spain and Catalonia parliaments. European Journal of Political Research, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.70005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  597. Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  598. Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., Bakker, B. N., & Spivack, E. (2022). Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies? Perspectives on Politics, 20(3), 808–827. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720002091 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  599. Minkus, L., Groepler, N., & Drobnič, S. (2022). The significance of occupations, family responsibilities, and gender for working from home: Lessons from COVID-19. PLOS ONE, 17(6), e0266393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266393 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  600. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  601. Off, G. (2023). Gender equality salience, backlash and radical right voting in the gender-equal context of Sweden. West European Politics, 46(3), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2084986 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  602. Off, G. (2024). Multidimensional and intersectional cultural grievances over gender, sexuality and immigration. European Journal of Political Research, 63(4), 1351–1373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12665 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  603. Ogletree, S. M., Diaz, P., & Padilla, V. (2019). What is Feminism? College Students’ Definitions and Correlates. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1576–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9718-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  604. Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  605. Otteni, C. (2025). Polarized Equality? Ideological and Affective Divides Over Gender Equality in Europe. Social Science Quarterly, 106(7), e70120. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70120 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  606. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  607. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  608. Peterson, B. E., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2010). Gender, Sexuality, and the Authoritarian Personality. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1801–1826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00670.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  609. Pew Research Center. (2021). Social Media Use in 2021. https://pewresearch-org-preprod.go-vip.co/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  610. Praet, S., Guess, A. M., Tucker, J. A., Bonneau, R., & Nagler, J. (2022). What’s Not to Like? Facebook Page Likes Reveal Limited Polarization in Lifestyle Preferences. Political Communication, 39(3), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1994066 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  611. Righetti, N., Kulichkina, A., Almeida Paroni, B., Cseri, Z. F., Aguirre, S. I., & Maikovska, K. (2025). Mainstreaming and transnationalization of anti-gender ideas through social media: The case of CitizenGO. Information, Communication & Society, 28(15), 2658–2681. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2470229 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  612. Sauer, B. (2024). Women, gender and right-wing authoritarian populism. In G. Frankenberg & W. Heitmeyer (Eds), Drivers of Authoritarianism (pp. 288–307). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035324705.00022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  613. Schäfer, I., Khoudja, Y., & Grunow, D. (2024). Gender attitudes and the new cultural divide in Europe. Social Science Research, 122, 103042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  614. Schöne, J. P., Parkinson, B., & Goldenberg, A. (2021). Negativity Spreads More than Positivity on Twitter After Both Positive and Negative Political Situations. Affective Science, 2(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  615. Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  616. Sobieraj, S. (2022). Gender, Digital Toxicity, and Political Voice Online. In D. A. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology (pp. 614–643). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.29 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  617. Sprong, S., Jetten, J., Wang, Z., Peters, K., Mols, F., Verkuyten, M., Bastian, B., Ariyanto, A., Autin, F., Ayub, N., Badea, C., Besta, T., Butera, F., Costa-Lopes, R., Cui, L., Fantini, C., Finchilescu, G., Gaertner, L., Gollwitzer, M., … Wohl, M. J. A. (2019). “Our Country Needs a Strong Leader Right Now”: Economic Inequality Enhances the Wish for a Strong Leader. Psychological Science, 30(11), 1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619875472 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  618. Swirsky, J. M., & Angelone, D. J. (2014). Femi-Nazis and Bra Burning Crazies: A Qualitative Evaluation of Contemporary Beliefs about Feminism. Current Psychology, 33(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9208-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  619. Van Bavel, J. J., Rathje, S., Harris, E., Robertson, C., & Sternisko, A. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(11), 913–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  620. Verbalyte, M., & Eigmüller, M. (2022). COVID-19 related social media use and attitudes towards pandemic control measures in Europe. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 7(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2022-1-37 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  621. Verloo, M. (Ed.). (2018). Varieties of opposition to gender equality in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315625744 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  622. Vida, B. (Ed.). (2022). The gendered politics of crises and de-democratization: Opposition to gender equality. ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  623. Waitkus, N., & Minkus, L. (2021). Investigating the Gender Wealth Gap Across Occupational Classes. Feminist Economics, 27(4), 114–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1973059 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  624. Wallaschek, S., Kaushik, K., Verbalyte, M., Sojka, A., Sorci, G., Trenz, H.-J., & Eigmüller, M. (2022). Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  625. Wallaschek, S., Verbalyte, M., & Eigmüller, M. (2024). Cleavage theory meets gender equality: Examining party positions in Germany. European Politics and Society, 25(5), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2024.2304591 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  626. Weeks, A. C., Caravantes, P., Espírito-Santo, A., Lombardo, E., Stratigaki, M., & Gul, S. (2025). When is gender on party agendas? Manifestos and (De-)democratisation in Greece, Portugal, and Spain. South European Society and Politics, 30(4), 561–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2024.2412746 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  627. Weiss, P., Koban, K., & Matthes, J. (2025). A narrow gateway from misogyny to the far right: Empirical evidence for social media exposure effects. Information, Communication & Society, 28(13), 2377–2395. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2445637 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  628. Welzel, C., Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2002). Gender Equality and Democracy. Comparative Sociology, 1(3–4), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913302100418628 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  629. Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien