Illegal logging, timber laundering and the global illegal timber trade

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover des Buchs: Geopolitics of the Illicit
Open Access Vollzugriff

Geopolitics of the Illicit

Linking the Global South and Europe

Autor:innen:
Reihe
Weltwirtschaft und internationale Zusammenarbeit
Band
25
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0015-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3594-0

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Illegal logging, timber laundering and the global illegal timber trade

Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0015-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3594-0
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abdenur, Adriana (2020): “How can artificial intelligence help curb deforestation in the Amazon?”. At: <https://theglobalobservatory.org/2020/11/how-can-artificial-intelligence-help-curb-deforestation-amazon/> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  2. Abdenur, Adriana (2022): What Can Global Governance do for Forests? Cooperation and Sovereignty in the Amazon. United Nations University, Centre for Policy Research. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  3. Abdenur, Adriana/Ferguson, Brodie/de Carvalho, Ilona Szabo/Risso, Melina/Muggah, Robert (2020): “Environmental Crime in the Amazon Basin. A Typology for Research, Policy and Action”. At: <https://igarape.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-08-19-AE-47_Environmental-Crime-Typology.pdf> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  4. Alessi, Gil (2021): “The Amazon rainforest under Bolsonaro. A story of fire and violence in Brazil”. At: <https://english.elpais.com/usa/2021-09-16/the-amazon-rainforest-under-bolsonaro-a-story-of-fire-and-violence-in-brazil.html> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  5. Azevedo, Andrea/Rajão, Raoni/Costa, Marcelo/Stabile, Marcelo/Macedo, Marcia et al. (2017): “Limits of Brazil’s Forest Code as a means to end illegal deforestation”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 29, pp. 7653-7658. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  6. Baker, Jacqui (2020):” Corrupt networks in the Indonesian forestry sector. Politics and pulp in Pelalawan, Riau”. At: <https://www.u4.no/publications/corrupt-networks-in-the-indonesian-forestry-sector.pdf> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  7. Barros, Ciro (2021): “The intimate relationship between cocaine and illegal timber in Brazil’s Amazon”. At: <https://insightcrime.org/news/intimate-relationship-between-cocaine-illegal-timber-brazil-amazon/> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  8. Bisschop, Lieselot (2012): “Out of the woods. The illegal trade in tropical timber and a European trade hub”. In: Global Crime, 13, 3, pp. 191-212. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  9. Bisschop, Lieselot (2015): Governance of the illegal trade in e-waste and tropical timber. Case studies on transnational environmental crime. Farnham: Ashgate. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  10. Blackman, Jo (2018): “EU ban on illegal timber. Uneven enforcement lets companies off the hook”. At: <https://www.globalwitness.org/en/blog/eu-ban-illegal-timber-uneven-enforcement-lets-companies-hook/> (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  11. Block, Alan (1983): East Side-West Side. Organizing Crime in New York, 1930-1950. New Brunswick: Transaction Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  12. Boekhout van Solinge, Tim (2008): “Eco-Crime. The tropical timber trade”. In: Siegel, Dina/Nelen, Hans (eds.): Organized crime. Culture, markets and policies. New York, NY: Springer Science/ Business Media LLC, pp. 97-111. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  13. Boekhout van Solinge, Tim/Zuidema, Pieter/Vlam, Mart/Cerutti, Paolo/Yemelin, Valentin (2016): “Organized forest crime. A criminological analysis with suggestions from timber forensics”. In: Kleinschmit, Daniela/Mansourian, Stephanie/Wildburger, Christoph/Purret, Andre (eds.): Illegal logging and related timber trade. Dimensions, drivers, impacts and response. A global scientific rapid response assessment report. Vienna: IUFRO, pp. 82-97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  14. Brancalion, Pedro/Almeida, Danilo de/Vidal, Edson/Molin, Paulo/Sontag, Vanessa/Souza, Saulo/Schulze, Mark (2018): “Fake Legal Logging in the Brazilian Amazon”. In: Science Advances, 4, 8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  15. Butler, Rhett A. (2020): “Despite COVID, Amazon deforestation races higher”. Mongabay. At: <https://news.mongabay.com/2020/04/despite-covid-amazon-deforestation-races-higher/> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  16. Carrington, Damien (2021): “Amazon rainforest now emitting more CO2 than it absorbs”. At: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jul/14/amazon-rainforest-now-emitting-more-co2-than-it-absorbs (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  17. Cashore, Benjamin/Leipold, Sina/Cerutti, Paolo Omar/Bueno, Gabriela/Carodenuto Sophia et al. (2016): “Global governance approaches to addressing illegal logging. Uptake and lessons learnt”. In: Kleinschmit, Daniela/Mansourian, Stephanie/Wildburger, Christoph/Purret, Andre (eds.): Illegal logging and related timber trade. Dimensions, drivers, impacts and responses. A global scientific rapid response assessment report. Vienna: IUFRO, pp. 120-131. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  18. Chatham House (n.d.-a): “Forest Governance and Legality. Brazil”. At: https://forestgovernance.chathamhouse.org/countries/brazil (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  19. Chatham House (n.d.-b): “Forest governance and legality. Indonesia”. At: https://forestgovernance.chathamhouse.org/countries/indonesia (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  20. Chimeli, Ariaster/Boyd, Roy/Adams, Darius (2012): “International timber markets and tropical deforestation. The evidence from prices”. In: Applied Economics, 44, 10, pp. 1303-1314. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  21. Corrêa, Alessandra 2014): “Brasil é exemplo de sucesso na redução do desmatamento, diz relatório”. At: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/noticias/2014/06/140604_desmatamento_relatorio_ac_hb (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  22. Davidescu, Simona/Buzogány, Aron (2021): “Cutting deals. Transnational advocacy networks and the European Union Timber Regulation at the eastern border”. In: The International Spectator, 56, 3, pp. 105-118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  23. Drewe, Charles/Barker, Tim (2016): Analysis of potential European Union Timber Regulation product scope changes. WWF - World Wide Fund for Nature. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  24. Earthsight (2021): “Untamed timber. The Brazilian flooring giant let off the hook by Bolsonaro’s government and now thriving across the US and EU”. At: https://www.earthsight.org.uk/news/investigations-brazil-untamed-timber (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  25. EIA, Environmental Investigation Agency (2012): Appetite for destruction. China’s trade in illegal timber. Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  26. EIA, Environmental Investigation Agency (2018): A tale of two laws. Using existing EU and US laws to strengthen action on illegal timber trade. Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  27. EIA, Environmental Investigation Agency/Telapak (2001): Timber trafficking. Illegal logging in Indonesia, South East Asia and international consumption of illegally sourced timber. Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA)/Telapak. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  28. EIA, Environmental Investigation Agency/Telapak (2004): Profiting from plunder. How Malaysia smuggled endangered wood. Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA)/Telapak. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  29. EIA, Environmental Investigation Agency/Telapak (2005). The last frontier. Illegal logging in Papua and China’s massive timber theft. Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA)/Telapak. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  30. EIA, Environmental Investigation Agency/Telapak (2006): Behind the veneer. How Indonesia’s last rainforests are being gelled for flooring. Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA)/Telakap. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  31. Escobar, Herton (2020): “Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is still rising sharply”. In: Science, 369, 6504, p. 613. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  32. European Commission (2021): “Questions and Answers on new rules for deforestation-free products”. At: <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_5919> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  33. FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (2020): The state of the world’s forests 2020. Forests, Biodiversity and People: FAO and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  34. Forest Trends (2010): Timber markets and trade between Laos and Vietnam. A commodity chain analysis of Vietnamese-driven timber flows. Forest Trends. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  35. Forest Trends (2018): The economic impacts of illegal agro-conversion on tropical forest countries. A new framework supports national and global cost estimates. Forest Trends. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  36. Gan, Jianbang/Cerutti, Paolo/Masiero, Mauro/Pettenella, Davide/Andrighetto, Nicola/Dawson, Tim (2016): “Quantifying illegal logging and related timber trade”. In: Kleinschmit, Daniela/Mansourian, Stephanie/Wildburger, Christoph/Purret, Andre (eds.): Illegal logging and related timber trade. Dimensions, drivers, impacts and responses. A global scientific rapid response assessment report. Vienna: IUFRO, pp. 38-59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  37. Gatti, Luciana/Basso, Luana/Miller, John/Gloor, Manuel/Gatti Domingues, Lucas et al. (2021): “Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change”. In: Nature, 595, 7867, pp. 388-393. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  38. Giurca, Alexandru/Jonsson, Ragnar/Rinaldi, Francesca/Priyadi, Hari (2013): “Ambiguity in timber trade regarding efforts to combat illegal logging. Potential impacts on trade between South-East Asia and Europe”. In: Forests, 4, 4, pp. 730-750. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  39. Global Witness (2021): “Last line of defence. The industries causing the climate crisis and attacks against land and environmental defenders”. At: <https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/environmental-activists/last-line-defence/> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  40. Goncalves, Marilyne/Panjer, Melissa/Greenberg, Theodore/Magrath, William (2012): Justice for forests. Improving criminal justice efforts to combat illegal logging. Washington, D.C: World Bank. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  41. Greenpeace (2018): “Imaginary trees, real destruction. How licensing fraud and illegal logging of Ipe trees are causing irreversible damage to the Amazon rainforest”. At: <https://www.greenpeace.de/publikationen/20180301-greenpeace_report_imaginary_trees_real_destruction.pdf> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  42. Hanbury, Shanna (2021): “Brazil’s environment minister faces second probe linked to illegal timber”. At: https://news.mongabay.com/2021/06/brazils-environment-minister-faces-second-probe-linked-to-illegal-timber/ (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  43. Hoare, Alison/Wellesley, Laura (2014): “Illegal logging and related trade. The response in Indonesia. A Chatham House Assessment”. At: <https://chathamhouse.soutron.net/Portal/DownloadImageFile.ashx?fieldValueId=4153> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  44. Human Rights Watch (2019): “Rainforest mafias. How violence and impunity fuel deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon”. At: <https://www.hrw.org/report/2019/09/17/rainforest-mafias/how-violence-and-impunity-fuel-deforestation-brazils-amazon> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  45. Hummel, Antônio (2016): “Deforestation in the Amazon: What is illegal and what is not?”. In: Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  46. Instituto BVRio (2016): “Using big data to detect illegality in the tropical timber sector. A case study of BVRio Due Diligence and Risk Assessment System”. At: <https://www.bvrio.org/publicacao/160/using-big-data-to-detect-illegality-int-the-tropical-timber-sector.pdf> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  47. INTERPOL (2019): Global forestry enforcement. Strengthening law enforcement cooperation against forestry crime. INTERPOL. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  48. INTERPOL/World Bank (2010): Chainsaw Project. An INTERPOL perspective on law enforcement in illegal logging. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  49. Jong, Hans (2019): “In Indonesia, a flawed certification scheme lets illegal loggers raze away”. At: https://news.mongabay.com/2019/05/in-indonesia-a-flawed-certification-scheme-lets-illegal-loggers-raze-away/ (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  50. Joy, Ajit (2010): Following the money trail. The challenges in illegal logging investigations. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  51. Kaphengst, Timo/Umpfenbach, Katharina/Bräuer, Ingo (2008): Ökonomische Folgen illegaler Holzimporte für die deutsche Holzwirtschaft. Greenpace / Ecologic - Institut für Internationale und Europäische Umweltpolitik. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  52. Kimbrough, Liz (2019): “Experts blame Bolsonaro for surge in deforestation, warn of worse to come”. At: <https://news.mongabay.com/2019/11/experts-blame-bolsonaro-for-surge-in-deforestation-warn-of-worse-to-come/> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  53. Kishor, Nalin/Lescuyer, Guillaume (2012): “Controlling illegal logging in domestic and international markets by harnessing multi-level governance opportunities”. In: International Journal of the Commons, 6, 2, pp. 255-270. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  54. Kleemans, Edward (2013): “Theoretical perspectives on organized crime”. In: Paoli, Letizia (ed.): Oxford handbook on organized crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  55. Kleinschmit, Daniela/Leipold, Sina/Sotirov, Metodi (2016): “Introduction. Understanding the complexities of illegal logging and associated timber trade”. In: Kleinschmit, Daniela/Mansourian, Stephanie/Wildburger, Christoph/Purret, Andre (eds.): Illegal logging and related timber trade. Dimensions, drivers, impacts and responses. A global scientific rapid response assessment report. Vienna: IUFRO, pp. 14-20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  56. Lawson, Sam (2014): Consumer goods and deforestation. An analysis of the extent and nature of illegality in forest conversion for agriculture and timber plantation. Forest Trends. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  57. Lawson, Sam/MacFaul, Larry (2010): Illegal logging and related trade. Indicators of the global response. The Royal Institute of International Affairs/Chatham House. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  58. Lippe, Rattiya/Cui, Shannon/Schweinle, Jörg (2021): “Estimating global forest-based employment”. In: Forests, 12, 9, 1219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  59. Liu, Fei/Wheiler, Kent/Ganguly, Indroneil/Hu, Mingxing (2020): “Sustainable timber trade. A study on discrepancies in Chinese logs and lumber trade statistics”. In: Forests, 11, 2, 205. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  60. Lowe, Andrew/Dormontt, Eleanor/Bowie, Matthew/Degen, Bernd/Gardner, Shelley et al. (2016): “Opportunities for improved transparency in the timber trade through scientific verification”. In: BioScience, 66, 11, pp. 990-998. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  61. McElwee, Pamela (2004): “You say illegal, I say legal”. In: Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 19, 1-3, pp. 97-135. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  62. Nellemann, Christian/INTERPOL Environmental Crime Programme (2012): “Green carbon, black trade. Illegal logging, tax fraud and laundering in the world’s tropical forests. A rapid response assessment”. At: <https://www.grida.no/publications/126> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  63. Nellemann, Christian/Henriksen, Rune/Pravettoni, Riccardo/Jesperson, Sasha (2020): “Forestry crimes and our planet”. In: Nikolakis, William/Innes, John L. (eds.): The wicked problem of forest policy. A multidisciplinary approach to sustainability in forest landscapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197-230. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  64. Nellemann, Christian/Henriksen, Rune/Raxter, Patricia/Ash, Neville/Mrema, Elizabeth (2014): The environmental crime crisis. Threats to sustainable development from illegal exploitation and trade in wildlife and forest resources. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Interpol. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  65. Papachristou, Lucy (2018): “Hong Kong woman sentenced in Rosewood trafficking case”. At: https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/8569-hong-kong-woman-sentenced-in-rosewood-trafficking-case (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  66. Peck, Tim (2001): The international timber trade. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing/Elsevier Science. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  67. Perazzoni, Franco (2018): “Amazonia, organized crime and illegal deforestation. Best practices for the protection of the Brazilian Amazon”. In: Ungar, Mark (ed.): The 21st century fight for the Amazon. Environmental enforcement in the world’s biggest rainforest. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21-55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  68. Phillips, Tom (2020): “Amazon deforestation surges to 12-year high under Bolsonaro”. At: <https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/01/amazon-deforestation-surges-to-12-year-high-under-bolsonaro> (accessed 18 May 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  69. Pohnan, Erica/Stone, Michael/Cashore, Benjamin (2014): “Global forest governance to address illegal logging. The rise of timber legality verification to rescue Indonesia’s forests”. In: Katila, Pia/Galloway, Glenn/Jong, Wil de/Pacheco, Pablo/Mery, Gerardo (eds.): Forest under pressure. Local responses to global issues. Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), pp. 241-254. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  70. Rajão, Raoni/Soares-Filho, Britaldo/Nunes, Felipe/Börner, Jan/Machado, Lilian et al. (2020): “The rotten apples of Brazil’s agribusiness”. In: Science, 369, 6501, pp. 246-248. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  71. Reboredo, Fernando (2013): “Socio-economic, environmental, and governance impacts of illegal logging”. In: Environment Systems and Decisions, 33, 2, pp. 295-304. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  72. Schloenhardt, Andreas (2008): The illegal trade in timber and timber products in the Asia-Pacific region. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  73. Schönenberg, Regine (2002): Die Kriminalisierung gesellschaftlicher Transformationsprozesse. Der Fall des brasilianischen Amazonasgebiets. Hessische Stiftung für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  74. Schulze, Mark/Grogan, James/Uhl, Chris/Lentini, Marco/Vidal, Edson (2008): “Evaluating Ipê (Tabebuia, Bignoniaceae) logging in Amazonia. Sustainable management or catalyst for forest degradation?”. In: Biological Conservation, 141, 8, pp. 2071-2085. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  75. Sotirov, Metodi/Pokorny, Benno/Kleinschmit, Daniela/Kanowski, Peter (2020): “international forest governance and policy. Institutional architecture and pathways of influence in global sustainability”. In: Sustainability, 12, 17, 7010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  76. Sotirov, Metodi/Storch, Sabine/Aggestam, Filip/Giurca, Alex/Selter, Andy et al. (2015): Forest policy integration in Europe. Lessons learnt, challenges ahead, and strategies to support sustainable forest management and multifunctional forestry in the future. INTEGRAL EU Policy Paper. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  77. Ungar, Mark (2018): “Introduction. The evolution of environmental enforcement”. In: Ungar, Mark (ed.): the 21st century fight for the Amazon. Environmental enforcement in the world’s biggest rainforest. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  78. United Nations (n.d.): “UN Comtrade Database. Indonesia’s Export Partners for HS 44, 47, 48 (2019)”. At: <http://comtrade.un.org/> (accessed 10 November 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  79. UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2013): criminal justice responses to the illegal trade in timber in Vietnam. At: <https://www.unodc.org/documents/southeastasiaandpacific/Publications/wildlife/CJS_Response_-_VIETNAM_01_13_Dec_201.pdf> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  80. Weimar, Holger/Janzen, Niels/Dieter, Matthias (2015): Market coverage of wood imports by the EU Timber Regulation. Thünen Working Paper Nr. 45, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  81. Wiedenhoeft, Alex/Simeone, John/Smith, Amy/Parker-Forney, Meaghan/Soares, Richard/Fishman, Akiva (2019): “Fraud and misrepresentation in retail forest products exceeds U.S. forensic wood science capacity”. In: PloS one, 14, 7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  82. Wit, Marieke/van Dam, Jinke/Cerutti, Paolo Omar/Lescuyer, Guillaume/Kerret, Rohini/McKeown, James Parker (2010): “Chainsaw milling: supplier to local markets. A synthesis”. In: European Tropical Forest Research Network (ETFRN) News 52, pp. 7-12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  83. Wood Floor Business (WFB) (2011): “Brazil notches big victory against illegal loggers”. At: https://www.woodfloorbusiness.com/news/article/15126422/brazil-notches-big-victory-against-illegal-loggers (accessed 21 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  84. World Bank (2008): Forests sourcebook. Practical guidance for sustaining forests in development cooperation. Washington, D.C: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  85. WWF, World Wide Fund for Nature (2021): “EU forest crime initiative. EU summary of the gap analysis. Project countries: Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Romania, Slovakia and Ukraine”. At: <https://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/EU-Forest-Crime-Initiative-EU-GAP-Analysis.pdf> (accessed 2 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  86. Wyatt, Tanya/van Uhm, Daan/Nurse, Angus (2020): “Differentiating criminal networks in the illegal wildlife trade. Organized, corporate and disorganized crime”. In: Trends in Organized Crime, 23, 4, pp. 350-366. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275
  87. Zhang, Jian/Gan, Jianbang (2007): “Who will meet China’s import demand for forest products?”. In: World Development, 35, 12, pp. 2150-2160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-275

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien