Is the ideal political leader still a man? Gendered conceptions of political leadership in the contemporary political elite in Western European democracies

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1
Open Access Vollzugriff

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1

Is the ideal political leader still a man? Gendered conceptions of political leadership in the contemporary political elite in Western European democracies

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts–how green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (2), 417–436. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  2. Abou-Chadi, T. & Krause, W. (2020). The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: A regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science, 50 (3), 829–847. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  3. Aldrich, A. S. & Somer-Topcu, Z. (2025). Glass ceilings, glass cliffs, and quicksands: Gendered party leadership in parliamentary systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  4. Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A. & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (gen)me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28 (1), 245–260. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  5. Annesley, C., Beckwith, K. & Franceschet, S. (2019). Cabinets, ministers, and gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  6. Armstrong, B., Barnes, T. D., Chiba, D. & O’Brien, D. Z. (2024). Financial crises and the selection and survival of women finance ministers. American Political Science Review, 118 (3), 1305–1323. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  7. Bäck, H., Müller, W. C., Angelova, M. & Strobl, D. (2021). Ministerial autonomy, parliamentary scrutiny and government reform output in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 55 (2), 254–286. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  8. Bale, T. (2003). Cinderella and her ugly sisters: The mainstream and extreme right in europe's bipolarising party systems. West European Politics, 26 (3), 67–90. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  9. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G. & Zelditch, M. J. (1985). Introduction: Expectation states theory – review and assessment. In J Berger and M Zelditch (Eds.) Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (1–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  10. Biernat, M. & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 707–724. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  11. Bjarnegård, E. (2015). Gender, informal institutions and political recruitment. Explaining male dominance in parliamentary representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  12. Bjarnegård, E. (2018). Men’s political representation. Accessed 06/01/2023. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-214. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  13. Braun, S., Stegmann, S., Hernandez Bark, A. S., Junker, N. M. & Van Dick, R. (2017). Think manager—think male, think follower—think female: Gender bias in implicit followership theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47 (7), 377–388. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  14. Bright, J., Döring, H. & Little, C. (2015). Ministerial importance and survival in government: Tough at the top? West European Politics, 38 (3), 441–464. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  15. Bruckmüller, S., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F. & Haslam, S. A. (2014). Beyond the glass ceiling: The glass cliff and its lessons for organizational policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8 (1), 202–232. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  16. Burgess, D. & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, public policy, and law, 5 (3), 665. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  17. Claveria, S. (2014). Still a ‘male business’? Explaining women’s presence in executive office. West European Politics, 37 (5), 1156–1176. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  18. Collignon, S. & Rüdig, W. (2020). Harassment and intimidation of parliamentary candidates in the united kingdom. The Political Quarterly, 91 (2), 422–429. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  19. Collignon, S. & Rüdig, W. (2021). Increasing the cost of female representation? The gendered effects of harassment, abuse and intimidation towards parliamentary candidates in the uk. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31 (4), 429–449. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  20. Curtin, J., Kerby, M. & Dowding, K. (2023). Sex, gender, and promotion in executive office: Cabinet careers in the world of westminster. Governance, 36 (1), 233–254. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  21. Davidson-Schmich, L. K., Jalalzai, F. & Och, M (2023). Crisis, Gender Role Congruency, and Perceptions of Executive Leadership. Politics & Gende,r 19: 900–907. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  22. Dingler, S. C. & Helms, L. (2023). Parliamentary women opposition leaders: A comparative assessment across 28 oecd countries. Politics and Governance, 11 (1), 85–96. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  23. Dingler, S. C. & Kroeber, C. (2022). Myths about women in the political executive – how gender stereotypes shape the way MPs assess the competences of ministers. Political Research Quarterly, 76 (3), 1403–1417. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  24. Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14 (6), 807–834. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  25. Eagly, A. H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 781–797. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  26. Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109 (3), 573–598. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  27. Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M. & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of u.S. Public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75 (3), 301–315. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  28. Eckel, C. C. & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal, 108 (448), 726–735. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  29. Erikson, J. & Josefsson, C. (2023). Feminine leadership ideals and masculine practices: Exploring gendered leadership conditions in the swedish parliament. Politics & Gender, 19 (4), 1061–1086. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  30. Erikson, J. & Josefsson, C. (2024). Adverse contagion? Populist radical right parties and norms on gender balance in political institutions. Politics and Governance, 12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  31. Escobar-Lemmon, M. & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2009). Getting to the top: Career paths of women in Latin American cabinets. Political Research Quarterly, 62 (4), 685–699. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  32. Escobar-Lemmon, M. & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2016). Women in presidential cabinets power players or abundant tokens? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  33. European Institute for Gender Equality. (2025). Gender equality index 2024. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2024/compare-countries/index/map. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  34. Foschi, M., Lai, L. & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57 (4), 326–339. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  35. Franceschet, S., Krook, M. L. & Piscopo, J. M. (Eds.) (2012). The impact of gender quotas. Oxford: University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  36. Franceschet, S. & Piscopo, J. M. (2013). Sustaining gendered practices? Power, parties, and elite political networks in argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 47 (1), 85–110. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  37. Goddard, D. (2019). Entering the men's domain? Gender and portfolio allocation in european governments. European Journal of Political Research, 58 (2), 631–655. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  38. Goddard, D. (2021). Examining the appointment of women to ministerial positions across europe: 1970–2015. Party Politics, 27 (4), 631–643. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  39. Håkansson, S. (2020). Do women pay a higher price for power? Gender bias in political violence in sweden. The Journal of Politics, 83 (2), 515–531. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  40. Heilman, M. E. & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (1), 81–92. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  41. Herrick, R. & Franklin, L. D. (2019). Is it safe to keep this job? The costs of violence on the psychological health and careers of us mayors. Social Science Quarterly, 100 (6), 2047–2058. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  42. Höhmann, D., Latteier, T. & Bailer, S. (2025). An early leak in the pipeline – online abuse as a barrier for young women’s political engagement. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  43. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  44. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  45. Inglehart, R. & Norris, P. (2000). The developmental theory of the gender gap: Women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective. International Political Science Review, 21 (4), 441–63. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  46. Inter-Parliamentary Union Parline. (2025). Women in national parliaments. World average. Accessed 10.1.2025. https://data.ipu.org/women-averages/?date_year=2025&date_month=01. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  47. Jalalzai, F. (2018). Women heads of state and government. In AC Alexander, C Bolzendahl and F Jalalzai (Eds.) Measuring women’s political empowerment across the globe (257–282). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  48. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A. & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (2), 126–136. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  49. Kroeber, C. & Dingler, S. C. (2023). Crisis and gender in legislative-executive relations. Politics & Gender, 19 (3), 908–914. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  50. Kroeber, C. & Hüffelmann, J. (2022). It's a long way to the top: Women's ministerial career paths. Politics & Gender, 18 (3), 741–767. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  51. Krook, M. L. (2006). Gender quotas, norms, and politics. Politics & Gender, 2 (1), 110–118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  52. Krook, M. L. & Mackay, F. (eds.). (2010). Gender, politics and institutions towards a feminist institutionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan: London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  53. Krook, M. L. & O'Brien, D. Z. (2012). All the president’s men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. Journal of Politics, 74 (3), 840–855. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  54. Mackay, F., Kenny, M. & Chappell, L. (2010). New institutionalism through a gender lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31 (5), 573–588. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  55. Mechkova, V. & Wilson, S. L. (2021). Norms and rage: Gender and social media in the 2018 US mid-term elections. Electoral Studies, 69, 102268. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  56. Miller, G. J. (2005). The political evolution of principal-agent theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 8 (1), 203–225. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  57. Montaudon-Tomas, C. M., Montaudon-Tomas, I. M. & Lomas-Montaudon, Y. (2020). Autocratic, transactional, and servant leadership in japan, france, and mexico: A cross-culture theoretical analysis. In Ç Doğru (Ed.) Leadership styles, innovation, and social entrepreneurship in the era of digitalization (101–133). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  58. Murray, R. (2010). Parties, gender quotas and candidate selection in France. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  59. Murray, R. (2014). Quotas for men: Reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representation for all. American Political Science Review, 108 (3), 520–532. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  60. Nichols, A. L. (2016). What Do People Desire in Their Leaders? The Effect of Leadership Experience on Desired Leadership Traits. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37 (5), 658–671. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  61. O'Brien, D. Z. (2015). Rising to the top: Gender, political performance, and party leadership in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (4), 1022–1039. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  62. O’Neill, B., Pruysers, S. & Stewart, D. K. (2019). Glass cliffs or partisan pressure? Examining gender and party leader tenures and exits. Political Studies, 69 (2), 257–277. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  63. Ohmura, T., Bailer, S., Meiβner, P. & Selb, P. (2018). Party animals, career changers and other pathways into parliament. West European Politics, 41 (1), 169–195. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  64. Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A. & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28 (2), 177–193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  65. Rheault, L., Rayment, E. & Musulan, A. (2019). Politicians in the line of fire: Incivility and the treatment of women on social media. Research & Politics, 6 (1), 2053168018816228. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  66. Rosenthal, C. S. (1998). When women lead: Integrative leadership in state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  67. Rosenthal, U., Boin, R. A. & Comfort, L. K. (2001) The Changing World of Crisis and Crisis Management. Springfield:Charles C Thomas Publisher. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  68. Rosenwasser, S. M. & Dean, N. G. (1989). Gender role and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13 (1), 77–85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  69. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E. & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (1), 165–179. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  70. Saaka, S. S. (2025). Shuffled and shortchanged? The gender gap in cabinet shuffles in Africa. African Affairs, 124 (495), 175–203,. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  71. Schain, M. A. (2016). The extreme-right and immigration policy-making: Measuring direct and indirect effects. In C. Mudde (Ed.), The populist radical right. London: Routledge, 476–491. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  72. Schein, V. E. & Mueller, R. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13 (5), 439–447. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  73. Schneider, M. C. & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40 (S1), 173–213. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  74. Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91 (5), 1053–1075. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  75. Silvia, C. & Mcguire, M. (2010). Leading public sector networks: An empirical examination of integrative leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21 (2), 264–277. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  76. Strolovitch, D. Z. (2013). Of mancessions and hecoveries: Race, gender, and the political construction of economic crises and recoveries. Perspectives on Politics, 11 (1), 167–176. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  77. Strolovitch, D. Z. (2021). When does a crisis begin? Race, gender, and the subprime noncrisis of the late 1990s. In J.A.C. Remes & A Horowitz (Eds.), Critical disaster studies (51–68). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  78. Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37 (3), 261–290. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  79. Taleghani, G., Salmani, D. & Taatian, A. (2010). Survey of leadership styles in different cultures. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies, 3 (3), 91–111. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  80. Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  81. Verge, T. & Claveria, S. (2016). Gendered political resources: The case of party office. Party Politics, 24 (5), 536–548. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56
  82. Yeganeh, H. (2017). Cultural modernization and work-related values and attitudes. International Journal of Development Issues, 16 (2), 130–146. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-56

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien