Selective Moderation of the Muslim Brotherhood under Mubarak – The Role of the Egyptian Regime’s Discourse and of Islamist Political Inclusion

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift Jahrgang 55 (2014), Heft 3
Vollzugriff

Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft

Jahrgang 55 (2014), Heft 3

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
ISSN-Print
0032-3470

Kapitelinformationen

Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 55 (2014), Heft 3

Selective Moderation of the Muslim Brotherhood under Mubarak – The Role of the Egyptian Regime’s Discourse and of Islamist Political Inclusion

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
0032-3470
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
Kapitelvorschau:

Dieser Artikel untersucht, welche Faktoren – neben politischer Inklusion – die ideologische Mäßigung von politischen Parteien oder Gruppierungen befördern oder behindern können. Anhand des Falls der Muslimbruderschaft (MB) unter Mubarak analysiert die Studie den Effekt von Regime-Diskurs und politischer Inklusion auf die ideologische Entwicklung von Islamisten. Ergebnis des Artikels ist: (i) ideologische Mäßigung setzt vor allem dann ein, wenn Inklusion mit einem negativen Diskurs des Regimes gegenüber der Muslimbruderschaft zusammenfällt; (ii) der moderierende Effekt des negativen Diskurses hält auch dann an, wenn Inklusion auf ein Minimum reduziert wird; (iii) der Inhalt dieses Diskurses prägt die spezifische Form der Mäßigung, d. h. in welchen Aspekten sich die Muslimbruderschaft mäßigt und in welchen nicht.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Akif, Muhammad. 2004. Mubadarat al-Murshid al-ʿAmm li-l-Ikhwan al-Muslimin [Reform Initiative of the MB’s General Guide]. In Tahawwalat al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun [Transformation of the MB], ed. Husam Tammam, 181-198. al-Qahira: Maktaba Madbuli. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Abu al-Nasr, Hamid. 1986. Interview, in al-Mussawar, 9 July. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. al-Banna, Hassan. [1947] 2006. Mushkilatuna fi Dau al-Nizam al-Islami [Our Dilemmas in relation to the Islamic system]. In Majmuʿat Rasa’il al-Imam al-Banna [Compilation of the Letters of Imam al-Banna], 628-753. al-Qahira: Dar al-Tawziʿa wa-l-Nashr al-Islamiya. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Bennett, Andrew. 2010. Process Tracing and Causal Inference, In Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, eds. Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 207-220. Plymouth: Rowman&Littlefield,. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Bermeo, Nancy. 1997. Myths of Moderation. Confrontation and Conflict during Democratic Transitions. Comparative Politics 29: 305-322. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/422123
  6. Browers, Michelle. 2009. Political Ideology in the Arab World. Accommodation and Transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626814.010
  7. Brown, Nathan, Amr Hamzawy, and Marina Ottaway. 2006. Islamist Movements and the Democratic Process in the Arab World: Exploring the Gray Zones. Carnegie Papers 67. Washington D. C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Brown, Nathan, and Amr Hamzawy. 2008. The Draft Party Platform of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood: Foray Into Political Integration or Retreat Into Old Positions? Carnegie Papers 89. Washington D. C.: Carnegie Endowment for International. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0006
  9. Clark, Janine, and Jilian Schwedler. 2003. Who Opened the Window? Women’s Activism in Islamist Parties. Comparative Politics 35: 293-312. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/4150178
  10. Clark, Janine. 2006. The Conditions of Islamist Moderation: Unpacking Cross-Ideological Cooperation in Jordan. International Journal of Middle East Studies 38: 539-560. doi: 10.1017/S0020743806412460. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0020743806412460
  11. Croissant, Aurel, and Peter Thiery. 2000/2001. Von defekten und anderen Demokratien. WeltTrends 29: 9-32. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Fürtig, Henner. 1995. Die ägyptische Muslimbruderschaft (al-ihwan al-muslimun) und der nationale Dialog – eine neue Taktik? asien afrika lateinamerika 23: 261-84. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. George, Alexander, and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. El-Ghobashy, Mona. 2005. The Metamorphosis of the Egyptian Muslim Brothers. International Journal of Middle East Studies 37: 373-395. doi: 10.1017/S0020743805052128 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0020743805052128
  15. Gurses, Mehmet. 2012. Islamists, democracy and Turkey: A test of the inclusion-moderation hypothesis. Party Politics [online first version, 5 June]: 1-14. doi: 10.1177/1354068812448688. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1354068812448688
  16. Hall, Peter. 2006. Systematic process analysis: when and how to use it. European Management Review 3: 24-31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500050
  17. al-Hudaybi, Ma’mun. 1995. Mawqif ʿan al-Aqbat [Viewpoint on the Copts]. In al-Ikhwan wa al-‘Unf [The MB and Violence], ed. Amr Shamach. al-Qahira [2007]: al-Saʿd li-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzi‘. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. al-Hudaybi, Ma’mun. 1996. The Principles of Politics in Islam. Cairo: Islamic Inc. Publishing and Distribution. [includes al-Hudaybi’s electoral programme of 1995] Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Huntington, Samuel. 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Ismail, Salwa. 2006. Rethinking Islamist Politics: Culture, the State and Islamism. London: I. B. Tauris Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Kalyvas, Stathis. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. New York: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Kepel, Gilles. 2005. The Roots of Radical Islam. London: Saqi Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/puf.kepel.2005.01.0436
  23. Krämer, Gudrun. 1996 The Integration of the Integrists: a Comparative Study of Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia. In Democracy without Democrats? The Renewal of Politics in the Muslim World, ed. Ghassan Salamé, 200-226. London: I.B. Tauris Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Lipset, Seymour, and Stein Rokkan. 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In idem: Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Lübben, Ivesa. 2004. Nationalstaat und islamische umma bei Hassan al-Banna, Gründungsmythos und Annäherung an die Gesellschaftliche Realität. In Geschichtskonzeptionen und Erinnerungsprozesse im Islam, eds. Angelika Hartmann, Sabine Damir-Geilsdorf and Béatrice Hendrich, 117-45. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Mayring, Philipp. 2008. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Basel: Beltz. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Merkel, Wolfgang, and Aurel Croissant. 2000. Formale und informale Institutionen in defekten Demokratien. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 41: 3-30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11615-000-0002-9
  28. Merkel, Wolfgang. 2004. Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization 11: 33-58. doi: 10.1080=13510340412331304598. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13510340412331304598
  29. Michels, Robert. [1915] 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Mitchell, Timothy. [1969] 1993. The Society of the Muslim Brothers. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Monier, Elizabeth Iskander, and Annette Ranko. 2013. The Fall of the Muslim Brotherhood: Implications for Egypt. Middle East Policy 20: 111-123. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12050
  32. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) [al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun]. 1994a. Al-Marʿa al-Muslima fi al-Mujtamaʿ al-Muslim [The Muslim Woman in the Muslim Society]. al-Qahira: Dar al-Tawziʿ wa-l-Nashr al-Islamiya. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB). 1994b. Mujaz ʿan al-Shura fi al-Islam wa-Taʿdud al-Ahzab fi al-Mujtamaʿ al-Muslim [Treatise on the Shura Principle in Islam and on Party Pluralism in the Muslim Society]. al-Qahira: Dar al-Tawziʿ wa-l-Nashr al-Islamiya. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB). 1999. Bayan al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB). 2005. al-Barnamaj al-Intikhabi li-l-Majlis al-Sha‘b [Electoral Programme for the Elections of the Lower House of Parliament]. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB). 2007a. al-Barnamaj al-Intikhabi li-l-Majlis al-Shura [Electoral Programme for the Elections of the Upper House of Parliament]. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB). 2007b. Barnamaj Hizb al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin – al-Isdar al-Awwal [Party Platform of the MB – First Issue]. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB). 2007c. Barnamaj al-Hizb – al-Qira‘a al-Ula [Party Platform – First Reading]. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB). 2010. al-Barnamaj al-Intikhabi li-l-Ikhwan al-Muslimin: Intikhabat Majlis al-Sha‘b [Electoral Programme for the Elections of the Lower House of Parliament]. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Przeworski, Adam. [1986] 1991. Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, eds. Guillermo O’Donnell, Philippe C. Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead, 47-63 Maryland: John Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Qutb, Sayid. 1964. Ma‘alim fi-l-tariq (Milestones). Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Ranko, Annette. 2015. The Muslim Brotherhood and its Quest for Hegemony. State Discourse and Islamist Counter Discourse in Egypt. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Richter, Carola. 2011. Medienstrategien ägyptischer Islamisten im Kontext von Demokratisierung. Berlin: Frank & Timme. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Schumpeter, Joseph. [1950] 2010. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Schwedler, Jilian. 2006. Faith in Moderation: Islamist Parties in Jordan and Yemen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Schwedler, Jilian. 2011. Can Islamists Become Moderates? Rethinking the Inclusion-­Moderation Hypothesis. World Politics 63: 347-376. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000050. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000050
  47. Share, Donald. 1985. Two Transitions: Democratisation and the Evolution of the Spanish Socialist Left. West European Politics 8: 82-103. doi: 10.1080/01402388508424515. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01402388508424515
  48. al-Talmasani, Umar. 1984. al-Hukuma al-Diniya [Religious Government]. al-Wafd, 5th July. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. al-Talmasani, Umar. 1985. al-Islam wa-l-Hukuma al-Diniya [Islam and Religious Government]. al-Qahira: Dar al-Tawziʿa wa-l-Nashr al-Islamiya. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Tepe, Sultan. 2012. Moderation of Religious Parties: Electoral Constraints, Ideological Commitments, and the Democratic Capacities of Religious Parties in Israel and Turkey. Political Research Quarterly 65: 467-458. doi: 10.1177/1065912911434473. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1065912911434473
  51. Tezcur, Gunes. 2010. The Moderation Theory Revisited: The Case of Islamic Political Actors. Party Politics 16: 69-88. doi: 10.1177/1354068809339536. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1354068809339536
  52. Wegner, Eva and Miquel Pellicer. 2009. Islamist moderation without democratization: the coming age of the Moroccan Party of justice and Development?. Democratization 16: 157-175. doi: 10.1080/13510340802575890. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13510340802575890
  53. Wickham, Carrie. 2002. Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism, and Political Change in Egypt. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Wickham, Carrie. 2004. The Path to Moderation: Strategy and Learning in the Formation of Egypt’s Wasat Party. Comparative Politics 36: 205-228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/4150143
  55. Wuhs, Steven. 2013. Inclusion and its moderating effects on ideas, interests and institutions: Mexico’s Partido Acción Nacional. Party Politics 19: 187-209. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472571. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472571
  56. Newspapers and Journals: Google Scholar öffnen

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien