Common Interests and Common Spaces: Visions of the Past and Future of International Justice

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos


Cover der Ausgabe: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law Jahrgang 85 (2025), Heft 1
Open Access Vollzugriff

Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law

Jahrgang 85 (2025), Heft 1


Autor:innen:
Verlag
C.H.BECK Recht - Wirtschaft - Steuern, München
Copyrightjahr
2025
ISSN-Online
2942-3562
ISSN-Print
0044-2348

Kapitelinformationen


Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 85 (2025), Heft 1

Common Interests and Common Spaces: Visions of the Past and Future of International Justice


Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
0044-2348
ISSN-Online
2942-3562


Kapitelvorschau:

From climate change to genocide, front page news is increasingly becoming the business of international courts. These cases are typically brought before the International Court of Justice on the basis of common interests in compliance with obligations owed to the international community or collective/shared responsibility associated with global challenges. Taking stock of recent developments, the present contribution considers how common-interest and common-space litigation has impacted the architecture of international justice in terms of legal interests, legal standing, third states’ interventions, and reparations, prompting the emergence of new institutional approaches to tackling these issues. In the attempt to sketch a narrative about the past and future of common-interest and common-space litigation (and the role of international judicial institutions therein), this article intends to provide a history-sensitive account of the ‘juridification’ process of common interests, and show the centrality of international courts and tribunals to the juridical life of common interests and common spaces. At the same time, it aims to illuminate how international justice has adapted to the challenges of international adjudication. Ultimately, it prompts reflections as to the evolving institutional dimensions of international justice in regard to common interests and common spaces.

Zitation


Download RIS Download BibTex