Internationale Verhandlungen via Twitter?

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen Jahrgang 28 (2021), Heft 2
Vollzugriff

ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen

Jahrgang 28 (2021), Heft 2

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2021
ISSN-Online
2942-1233
ISSN-Print
0946-7165

Kapitelinformationen

Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 28 (2021), Heft 2

Internationale Verhandlungen via Twitter?

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
0946-7165
ISSN-Online
2942-1233
Kapitelvorschau:

Twitter hat sich für viele Disziplinen zu einem wichtigen Untersuchungsgegenstand und einer interessanten Datenquelle entwickelt. Jedoch wird die Kommunikationsplattform von Forscher*innen der transnationalen und Internationalen Beziehungen (IB) bislang wenig untersucht. Unter den verschiedenen sozialen Medien wird Twitter am intensivsten von politischen Akteur*innen genutzt. Dies liegt vor allem an der Zugänglichkeit, Öffentlichkeit und Schnelllebigkeit der Plattform. Twitter schafft so einen digitalen öffentlichen Diskursraum, in dem verschiedene Akteur*innen länderübergreifend und ohne Zeitverzögerung direkt miteinander interagieren können. In diesem Beitrag möchten wir aufzeigen, wie Twitter von Akteur*innen im Bereich der internationalen Politik genutzt werden kann, mit besonderem Fokus auf internationalen Verhandlungen. Abschließend erörtern wir die Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen, die sich für Forscher*innen der IB bei der Nutzung von Twitter-Daten ergeben können.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abdel-Motaal, Doaa 2016: Antarctica: The Battle for the Seventh Continent, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  2. Agnew, John 1994: The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory, in: Review of International Political Economy 1: 1, S. 53-80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  3. Agnew, John 1998: Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  4. Agnew, John 2005: Hegemony: The New Shape of Global Power, Philadelphia. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  5. Albert, Mathias/Jacobson, David/Lapid, Yosef (Hrsg.) 2001: Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations, Minneapolis. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  6. Albert, Mathias/Wehrmann, Dorothea 2015: Polarpolitik: Ein Bericht zur politikwissenschaftlichen Arktis- und Antarktisliteratur, in: Neue Politische Literatur 60: 1, S. 63-89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  7. Albert, Mathias/Vasilache, Andreas 2017: Governmentality of the Arctic as an international region, in: Cooperation and Conflict 53: 1, S. 3-22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  8. Arnold, Samantha 2012: Constructing an Indigenous Nordicity: The “New Partnership” and Canada’s Northern Agenda, in: International Studies Perspectives 13: 1, S. 105-120. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  9. Arvanitakis, James 2006: The Commons: Opening and Enclosing Non-Commodified Space, in: PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 3: 1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  10. Atzili, Boaz 2011: Good Fences, Bad Neighbors: Border Fixity and International Conflict, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  11. Azzam, Issam 1964: The Dispute between France and Brazil over Lobster Fishing in the Atlantic, in: The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 13: 4, S. 1453-1459. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  12. Ball, Wayne S. 1996: The Old Grey Mare, National Enclosure of the Oceans, in: Ocean Development & International Law 27: 1-2, S. 97-124. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  13. Bar-Noi, Uri 2015: The Cold War and Britain's dispute with the USSR over territorial waters and fishery limits, 1953–1956, in: Journal for Maritime Research 17: 2, S. 195-210. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  14. Bastmeijer, Kees 2018: Introduction: The Madrid Protocol 1998–2018. The need to address ‘the Success Syndrome', in: The Polar Journal 8: 2, S. 230-240. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  15. Beck, Peter 1994: Who Owns Antarctica? Governing and Managing the Last Continent, Durham. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  16. Beery, Jason 2016: Unearthing global natures: Outer space and scalar politics, in: Political Geography 55, S. 92-101. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  17. Berking, Helmuth (Hrsg.) 2006: Die Macht des Lokalen in einer Welt ohne Grenzen, Frankfurt. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  18. Betsill, Michele M./Benney, Tabitha M./Gerlak, Andrea K. (Hrsg.) 2020: Agency in Earth System Governance, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  19. Biermann, Frank/Kim, Rakhyun E (Hrsg.) 2020: Architectures of Earth System Governance: Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  20. Billé, Franck (Hrsg.) 2020: Voluminous States: Sovereignty, Materiality, and the Territorial Imagination, Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  21. Blatter, Joachim/Haverland, Markus 2012: Designing case studies: Explanatory approaches in small-N research, Houndmills. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  22. Blomley, Nicholas 2008: Enclosure, Common Right and the Property of the Poor, in: Social & Legal Studies 17: 3, S. 311-331. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  23. Blount, P. J. 2019: Space Traffic Management: Standardizing On-Orbit Behavior, in: AJIL Unbound 113, S. 120-124. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  24. Borgerson, Scott G. 2013: The Coming Arctic Boom: As the Ice Melts, the Region Heats Up, in: Foreign Affairs 92: 4, S. 76-89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  25. Bourrel, Marie/Thiele, Torsten/Currie, Duncan 2018: The common of heritage of mankind as a means to assess and advance equity in deep sea mining, in: Marine Policy 95, S. 311-316. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  26. Brando, Nicolás/Boonen, Christiaan/Cogolati, Samuel/Hagen, Rutger/Vanstappen, Nils/ Wouters, Jan 2019: Governing as commons or as global public goods: Two tales of power, in: International Journal of the Commons 13: 1, S. 553-577. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  27. Brenner, Neil 1999: Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies, in: Theory and Society 28: 1, S. 39-78. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  28. Buck, Susan J. 1998: The Global Commons: An Introduction, Washington D.C. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  29. Butler, David L. 2001: Technogeopolitics and the struggle for control of world air routes, 1910–1928, in: Political Geography 20: 5, S. 635-658. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  30. Byers, M. 2019: Cold, dark, and dangerous: international cooperation in the arctic and space, in: Polar Record 55: 1, S. 32-47. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  31. Childs, John 2016: Geography and resource nationalism: A critical review and reframing, in: The Extractive Industries and Society 3: 2, S. 539-546. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  32. Collis, Christy 2009: The Geostationary Orbit: A Critical Legal Geography of Space's Most Valuable Real Estate, in: The Sociological Review 57: 1_suppl, S. 47-65. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  33. Collis, Christy 2017: Territories beyond possession? Antarctica and Outer Space, in: The Polar Journal 7: 2, S. 287-302. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  34. Craven, Matt 2019: ‘Other Spaces’: Constructing the Legal Architecture of a Cold War Commons and the Scientific-Technical Imaginary of Outer Space, in: European Journal of International Law 30: 2, S. 547-572. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  35. Cumbers, Andrew 2015: Constructing a global commons in, against and beyond the state, in: Space and Polity 19: 1, S. 62-75. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  36. de Carvalho, Benjamin/Leira, Halvard/Hobson, John M. 2012: The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919, in: Millennium – Journal of International Studies 39: 3, S. 735-758. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  37. De Santo, Elizabeth M. 2020: Militarized marine protected areas in overseas territories: Conserving biodiversity, geopolitical positioning, and securing resources in the 21st century, in: Ocean & Coastal Management 184, S. 105006. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  38. Dodds, Klaus 2010: Flag planting and finger pointing: The Law of the Sea, the Arctic and the political geographies of the outer continental shelf, in: Political Geography 29: 2, S. 63-73. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  39. Dörre, Klaus 2009: Die neue Landnahme: Dynamiken und Grenzen des Finanzmarktkapitalismus, in: Dörre, Klaus, et al. (Hrsg.): Soziologie – Kapitalismus – Kritik: Eine Debatte, Frankfurt, S. 21-86. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  40. Dutton, Peter A. 2009: Caelum Liberum: Air Defense Identification Zones outside Sovereign Airspace, in: The American Journal of International Law 103: 4, S. 691-709. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  41. Elden, Stuart 2005: Missing the Point: Globalization, Deterritorialization and the Space of the World, in: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30: 1, S. 8-19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  42. Elden, Stuart 2013: The Birth of Territory, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  43. Fazal, Tanisha M. 2007: State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Occupation and Annexation, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  44. Feichtner, Isabel 2019: Mining for humanity in the deep sea and outer space: The role of small states and international law in the extraterritorial expansion of extraction, in: Leiden Journal of International Law 32: 2, S. 255-274. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  45. Feichtner, Isabel/Ranganathan, Surabhi 2019: International Law and Economic Exploitation in the Global Commons: Introduction, in: European Journal of International Law 30: 2, S. 541-546. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  46. Fennell, Lee Ann 2011: Ostrom’s Law: Property rights in the commons, in: International Journal of the Commons 5: 1, S. 9-27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  47. Gehring, Thomas/Oberthür, Sebastian (Hrsg.) 1997: Internationale Umweltregime: Umweltschutz durch Verhandlungen und Verträge, Opladen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  48. George, Alexander L./Bennett, Andrew 2005: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  49. Giordano, Mark 2003: The Geography of the Commons: The Role of Scale and Space, in: Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93: 2, S. 365-375. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  50. Glasze, Georg 2013: Politische Räume: Die diskursive Konstitution eines "geokulturellen Raums" – die Frankophonie, Bielefeld. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  51. Görg, Christoph/Plank, Christina/Wiedenhofer, Dominik/Mayer, Andreas/Pichler, Melanie/ Schaffartzik, Anke/Krausmann, Fridolin 2019: Scrutinizing the Great Acceleration: The Anthropocene and its analytic challenges for social-ecological transformations, in: The Anthropocene Review 7: 1, S. 42-61. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  52. Greaves, Wilfrid 2016: Arctic (in)security and Indigenous peoples: Comparing Inuit in Canada and Sámi in Norway, in: Security Dialogue 47: 6, S. 461-480. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  53. Hardin, Garrett 1968: The Tragedy of the Commons, in: Science 162: 3859, S. 1243-1248. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  54. Harley, J.B. 2001: The New Nature of Maps: Essays in the History of Cartography, edited by Paul Laxton, Baltimore. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  55. Harmes, Adam 2012: The rise of neoliberal nationalism, in: Review of International Political Economy 19: 1, S. 59-86. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  56. Harvey, David 2001: Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography, Edinburgh. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  57. Headrick, Daniel R. 1981: Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  58. Helleiner, Eric/Pickel, Andreas (Hrsg.) 2005: Economic Nationalism in a Globalizing World, Ithaca. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  59. Houghton, Katherine/Rochette, Julien 2014: Introduction: Advancing governance of areas beyond national jurisdiction, in: Marine Policy 49, S. 81-84. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  60. Kahler, Miles 2006: Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization, in: Kahler, Miles/ Walter, Barbara F. (Hrsg.): Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization, Cambridge, S. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  61. Keller, Arthur S./Lissitzyn, Oliver J./Mann, Frederik J. 1938: Creation of Rights of Sovereignty Through Symbolic Acts, 1400-1800, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  62. Kent, H. S. K. 1954: The Historical Origins of the Three-Mile Limit, in: The American Journal of International Law 48: 4, S. 537-553. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  63. Kirsch, Scott 1995: The Incredible Shrinking World? Technology and the Production of Space, in: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13: 5, S. 529-555. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  64. Korf, Benedikt/Schetter, Conrad 2012: Räume des Ausnahmezustands: Carl Schmitts Raumphilosophie, Frontiers und Ungoverned Territories, in: Peripherie 32: 126-127, S. 147-170. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  65. Koskenniemi, Martti 2007: The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics, in: The Modern Law Review 70: 1, S. 1-30. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  66. Kratochwil, Friedrich 1986: Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System, in: World Politics 39: 1, S. 27-52. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  67. Kuijer, Martin/Werner, Wouter 2017: The Paradoxical Place of Territory in International Law, in: Kuijer, Martin/Werner, Wouter (Hrsg.): Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2016: The Changing Nature of Territoriality in International Law, The Hague, S. 3-17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  68. Lambach, Daniel 2020a: Cooperation in the Cold: The Arctic Search and Rescue Agreement, in: Weber, Joachim F. (Hrsg.): Handbook on Geopolitics and Security in the Arctic: The High North Between Cooperation and Confrontation, Cham, S. 273-289. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  69. Lambach, Daniel 2020b: Sicherheitszonen auf dem Mond? Die „Artemis Accords“ und die Schaffung neuer Räumlichkeiten, SichTRaum Blog, 31. Mai 2020, in: https:// www.sichtraum-netzwerk.de/2020/05/31/sicherheitszonen-auf-dem-mond-die-artemis- accords-und-die-schaffung-neuer-raeumlichkeiten; 30.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  70. Lambach, Daniel 2021: The Functional Territorialization of the High Seas, in: Marine Policy, forthcoming. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  71. Lee, Seokwoo 2000: Continuing Relevance of Traditional Modes of Territorial Acquisition in International Law and Modest Proposal, in: Connecticut Journal of International Law 16: 1, S. 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  72. Lefebvre, Henri 1991: The Production of Space, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  73. Lefebvre, Henri 2009: State, Space, World: Selected Essays, Edited by Neil Brenner and Stuart Elden, Minneapolis. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  74. Leib, Karl 2015: State Sovereignty in Space: Current Models and Possible Futures, in: Astropolitics 13: 1, S. 1-24. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  75. Lin, Weiqiang 2018: Spacing the Atmosphere: The Politics of Territorialising Air, in: Peters, Kimberley, et al. (Hrsg.): Territory Beyond Terra, London, S. 35-49. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  76. Lövbrand, Eva/Stripple, Johannes 2006: The Climate as Political Space: On the Territorialisation of the Global Carbon Cycle, in: Review of International Studies 32: 2, S. 217-235. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  77. Löw, Martina 2016: The Sociology of Space: Materiality, Social Structures and Action. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  78. Low, Setha M. 2016: Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  79. Mahoney, James 2000: Path Dependence in Historical Sociology, in: Theory and Society 29: 4, S. 507-548. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  80. Maier, Charles S. 2000: Consigning the Twentieth Century to History: Alternative Narratives for the Modern Era, in: The American Historical Review 105: 3, S. 807-831. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  81. Mansfield, Becky 2004: Neoliberalism in the oceans: “rationalization,” property rights, and the commons question, in: Geoforum 35: 3, S. 313-326. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  82. McCormack, Fiona 2017: Private Oceans: The Enclosure and Marketisation of the Seas. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  83. McKitterick, T. E. M. 1939: The Validity of Territorial and Other Claims in Polar Regions, in: Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 21: 1, S. 89-97. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  84. Mejía-Kaiser, Martha 2020: The Geostationary Ring: Practice and Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  85. Mendenhall, Elizabeth 2018: Treating Outer Space Like a Place: A Case for Rejecting Other Domain Analogies, in: Astropolitics 16: 2, S. 97-118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  86. Mickelson, Karin 2019: Common Heritage of Mankind as a Limit to Exploitation of the Global Commons, in: European Journal of International Law 30: 2, S. 635-663. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  87. Mildenberger, Matto 2019: The Tragedy of the Tragedy of the Commons, Scientific American Voices Blog, 23. April 2019, in: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/the-tragedy Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  88. -of-the-tragedy-of-the-commons; 30.4.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  89. Min, Pan 2017: Fisheries issue in the Central Arctic Ocean and its future governance, in: The Polar Journal 7: 2, S. 410-418. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  90. Moss, Timothy 2014: Spatiality of the Commons, in: International Journal of the Commons 8: 2, S. 457-471. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  91. Mueller, Milton L. 2019: Against Sovereignty in Cyberspace, in: International Studies Review, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  92. S. forthcoming. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  93. Ó Tuathail, Gearóid 1996: Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space, Minneapolis. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  94. Oduntan, Gbenga 2012: Sovereignty and Jurisdiction in the Air Space and Outer Space. Legal Criteria for Spatial Delimination, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  95. Osiander, Andreas 2001: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth, in: International Organization 55: 02, S. 251-287. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  96. Østreng, Willy/Skagestad, Gunnar 1974: The Challenge of New Territories – An Introduction, in: Cooperation and Conflict 9: 2/3, S. 1-4. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  97. Ostrom, Elinor 1990: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  98. Ostrom, Elinor 2010: Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems, in: The American Economic Review 100: 3, S. 641-672. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  99. Owsiak, Andrew P./Diehl, Paul F./Goertz, Gary 2016: Border settlement and the movement toward and from negative peace, in: Conflict Management and Peace Science 34: 2, S. 176-193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  100. Pallister-Wilkins, Polly 2016: How walls do work: Security barriers as devices of interruption and data capture, in: Security Dialogue 47: 2, S. 151-164. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  101. Pelton, Joseph 2017: The New Gold Rush. The Riches of Space Beckon!, Cham. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  102. Peters, Kimberley/Steinberg, Philip/Stratford, Elaine (Hrsg.) 2018: Territory Beyond Terra, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  103. Peterson, M. J. 1997: The Use of Analogies in Developing Outer Space Law, in: International Organization 51: 2, S. 245-274. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  104. Pontecorvo, Giulio 1988: The enclosure of the marine commons: Adjustment and redistribution in world fisheries, in: Marine Policy 12: 4, S. 361-372. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  105. Pryke, Sam 2017: Explaining Resource Nationalism, in: Global Policy 8: 4, S. 474-482. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  106. Pyne, Steve 2010: Extreme Environments, in: Environmental History 15: 3, S. 509-513. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  107. Rozwadowski, Helen M. 2005: Fathoming the Ocean, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  108. Ruggie, John Gerard 1992: Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution, in: International Organization 46: 3, S. 561-598. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  109. Ruggie, John Gerard 1993: Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations, in: International Organization 47: 1, S. 139-174. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  110. Runge, C. Ford/Defrancesco, Edi 2006: Exclusion, Inclusion, and Enclosure: Historical Commons and Modern Intellectual Property, in: World Development 34: 10, S. 1713-1727. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  111. Ryan, Barry J. 2015: Security spheres: A phenomenology of maritime spatial practices, in: Security Dialogue 46: 6, S. 568-584. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  112. Sack, Robert D. 1986: Human Territoriality: Its theory and history, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  113. Sassen, Saskia 2006: Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  114. Schladebach, Marcus 2014: Lufthoheit: Kontinuität und Wandel, Tübingen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  115. Scholte, Jan A. 2005: Globalization: A Critical Introduction, 2nd edition, 2nd. Aufl.,Houndmills. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  116. Schrijver, Nico 2016: Managing the global commons: common good or common sink?, in: Third World Quarterly 37: 7, S. 1252-1267. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  117. Schwartz, Daniel 2020: Discovery Rights and the Arctic, in: International Theory, 12: 3, S. 387-407. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  118. Sevilla-Buitrago, Alvaro 2015: Capitalist Formations of Enclosure: Space and the Extinction of the Commons, in: Antipode 47: 4, S. 999-1020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  119. Skagestad, Gunnar/Traavik, K. I. M. 1974: New Problems—Old Solutions, in: Cooperation and Conflict 9: 2/3, S. 39-51. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  120. Slann, Phillip A. 2014: Space debris and the need for space traffic control, in: Space Policy 30: 1, S. 40-42. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  121. Soja, Edward 1989: Postmodern Geographies, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  122. Soroos, Marvin S. 1982: The Commons in the Sky: The Radio Spectrum and Geosynchronous Orbit as Issues in Global Policy, in: International Organization 36: 3, S. 665-677. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  123. Soroos, Marvin S. 1991: The Atmosphere as an International Common Property Resource, in: Nagel, Stuart S. (Hrsg.): Global Policy Studies: International Interaction toward Improving Public Policy, London, S. 188-220. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  124. Srivastava, Jayati/Sharma, Ananya 2014: International Relations Theory and World Order: Binaries, Silences and Alternatives, in: South Asian Survey 21: 1-2, S. 20-34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  125. Steinberg, Philip E. 2001: The Social Construction of the Ocean, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  126. Stern, Paul C. 2011: Design principles for global commons: Natural resources and emerging technologies, in: International Journal of the Commons 5: 2, S. 213-232. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  127. Su, Jinyuan 2015: The East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone and International Law, in: Chinese Journal of International Law 14: 2, S. 271-303. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  128. Traavik, Kim 1974: The Conquering of Inner Space: Resources and Conflicts on the Seabed, in: Cooperation and Conflict 9: 2/3, S. 5-21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  129. Trevisanut, Seline 2010: Search and Rescue Operations in the Mediterranean: Factor of Cooperation or Conflict?, in: The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 25: 4, S. 523-542. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  130. van der Linden, Mieke 2016: The Acquisition of Africa (1870-1914): The Nature of International Law, Leiden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  131. Varone, Frédéric/Nahrath, Stéphane/Aubin, David/Gerber, Jean-David 2013: Functional regulatory spaces, in: Policy Sciences 46: 4, S. 311-333. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  132. Vogler, John 1995: The Global Commons: A Regime Analysis, Chichester. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  133. Vogler, John 2001: Future Directions: The atmosphere as a global commons, in: Atmospheric Environment 35: 13, S. 2427-2428. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  134. Vogler, John 2012: Global Commons Revisited, in: Global Policy 3: 1, S. 61-71. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  135. Walker, Wyndham L. 1945: Territorial Waters: The Cannon Shot Rule, in: British Yearbook of International Law 22, S. 210-231. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  136. Watt, Donald Cameron 1979: First steps in the enclosure of the oceans: The origins of Truman's proclamation on the resources of the continental shelf, 28 September 1945, in: Marine Policy 3: 3, S. 211-224. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  137. Weeden, Brian C./Chow, Tiffany 2012: Taking a common-pool resources approach to space sustainability: A framework and potential policies, in: Space Policy 28: 3, S. 166-172. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  138. Wijkman, Per Magnus 1982: Managing the global commons, in: International Organization 36: 3, S. 511-536. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  139. Wissen, Markus 2011: Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse in der Internationalisierung des Staates: Konflikte um die Räumlichkeit staatlicher Politik und die Kontrolle natürlicher Ressourcen, Münster. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  140. Wolf, Klaus Dieter 1991: Internationale Regime zur Verteilung globaler Ressourcen: Eine vergleichende Analyse der Grundlagen ihrer Entstehung am Beispiel der Regelung des Zugangs zur wirtschaftlichen Nutzung des Meeresbodens, des geostationären Orbits, der Antarktis und zu Wissenschaft und Technologie, Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  141. Wolfrum, Rüdiger 1984: Die Internationalisierung staatsfreier Raume: Die Entwicklung einer Internationalen Verwaltung für Antarktis, Weltraum, Hohe See and Meeresboden, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  142. Young, Oran 1994: International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society, Ithaca. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  143. Zacher, Mark W./McConnell, James G. 1990: Down to the sea with stakes: The evolving law of the sea and the future of the deep seabed regime, in: Ocean Development & International Law 21: 1, S. 71-103. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  144. Zacher, Mark W. 2001: The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force, in: International Organization 55: 2, S. 215-250. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  145. Zalik, Anna 2018: Mining the seabed, enclosing the Area: ocean grabbing, proprietary knowledge and the geopolitics of the extractive frontier beyond national jurisdiction, in: International Social Science Journal 68: 229-230, S. 343-359. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  146. Zangl, Bernhard 2003: Regimetheorie, in: Schieder, Siegfried/Spindler, Manuela (Hrsg.): Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen: Eine Einführung, Opladen, S. 117-140. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5
  147. Anderson, Ben 2010: Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies, in: Progress in Human Geography 34: 6, 777-798. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  148. Aradau, Claudia 2016: Risk, (in)security and international politics, in: Burgess, Adam/ Alemanno, Alberto/Zinn, Jens (Hrsg.): Routledge handbook of risk studies, New York, 477-488. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  149. Aradau, Claudia/Lobo-Guerrero, Luis/van Munster, Rens 2008: Security, Technologies of Risk, and the Political: Guest Editors' Introduction, in: Security Dialogue 39: 2-3, 147-154. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  150. Aradau, Claudia/van Munster, Rens 2007: Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un) knowing the future, in: European Journal of International Relations 13: 1, 89-115. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  151. Arizman, Ibrahim 2015: Field Organization and Disaster Medical Assistance Teams, in: Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine 15: 1, 11-19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  152. Axworthy, Lloyd 2016: Resetting the Narrative on Peace and Security. R2P in the Next Ten Years, in: Bellamy, Alex J./Dunne, Timothy (Hrsg.): The Oxford handbook of the responsibility to protect, Oxford, 968-983. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  153. Bamberg, Günter/Coenenberg, Adolf G./Krapp, Michael 2019: Betriebswirtschaftliche Entscheidungslehre, München. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  154. Bayer, Stefan 2015: Multidisziplinäre Konfliktbearbeitung. Ein Plädoyer aus ökonomischer Perspektive, in: Gräb-Schmidt, Elisabeth/Heesch, Matthias/Lohmann, Friedrich/Schlenke, Dorothee/Seibert, Christoph (Hrsg.): Leibhaftes Personsein. Theologische und interdisziplinäre Perspektiven; Festschrift für Eilert Herms zum 75. Geburtstag, Leipzig, 313-324. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  155. Bayer, Stefan/Struck, Simon 2021: Klimaschutzpolitik vor dem Scheitern, in: German Institute for Defence and Strategic Studies (Hrsg.): Kritische Infrastrukturen und Klimawandel als Herausforderungen für die Sicherheitspolitik. Südamerikanische Erfahrungen als Modell für Deutschland?, 15-22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  156. Beck, Ulrich 1986: Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  157. Belcher, Oliver/Bigger, Patrick/Neimark, Ben/Kennelly, Cara 2020: Hidden carbon costs of the „everywhere war“. Logistics, geopolitical ecology, and the carbon boot‐print of the US military, in: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45: 1, 65-80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  158. Bezerita, Luciana 2013: Emergency management, current issues and perspectives on national and international level, in: Internal Auditing and Risk Management 30: 1, 321-334. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  159. Boas, Ingrid/Rothe, Delf 2016: From conflict to resilience? Explaining recent changes in climate security discourse and practice, in: Environmental Politics 25: 4, 613-632. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  160. Bourbeau, Philippe 2013: Resiliencism: premises and promises in securitisation research, in: Resilience 1: 1, 3-17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  161. Brauch, Hans G. 2011: Concepts of Security Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks, in: Brauch, Hans G./Oswald Spring, Úrsula/Mesjasz, Czeslaw/Grin, John/Kameri-Mbote, Patricia/Chourou, Béchir/Dunay, Pál/Birkmann, Jörn (Hrsg.): Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security. Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks, Berlin, Heidelberg, 61-106. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  162. Briggs, Chad M. 2012: Climate Security, risk assessment and military planning, in: International Affairs 88: 5, 1049-1064. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  163. Brosig, Max/Frawley, Parker/Hill, Andrew/Jahn, Molly/Marsicek, Michael/Paris, Aubrey/ Rose, Matthew/Shambaljamts, Amar/Thomas, Nicole 2019: Implications of Climate Change for the US Army, Carlisle, in: https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/20 19/07/implications-of-climate-change-for-us-army_army-war-college_2019.pdf; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  164. Brzoska, Michael 2012: Climate change and the military in China, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, in: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68: 2, 43-54. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  165. Brzoska, Michael 2015: Climate change and military planning, in: International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 7: 2, 172-190. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  166. Buhaug, Halvard 2016: Climate Change and Conflict: Taking Stock, in: Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 22: 4, 331-338. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  167. Bundesministerium der Verteidigung (BMVg) 2016: Weißbuch 2016. Zur Sicherheitspolitik und zur Zukunft der Bundeswehr, Berlin, in: https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/b lob/975292/736102/64781348c12e4a80948ab1bdf25cf057/weissbuch-zur-sicherheitspolitik-2016-download-data.pdf?download=1; 8.10.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  168. Canadian Department of National Defence (Canadian DND) 2017a: Defence Energy and Environment Strategy. Harnessing energy efficiency and sustainability: Defence and the road to the future, Ottawa, in: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/dnd-mdn/documents/r eports/2017/20171004-dees-en.pdf; 8.10.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  169. Canadian Department of National Defence (Canadian DND) 2017b: Strong, Secure, Engaged. Canada's Defence Policy., Ottawa, in: http://dgpaapp.forces.gc.ca/en/canada-defence-pol icy/docs/canada-defence-policy-report.pdf; 8.10.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  170. Canadian Department of National Defence (Canadian DND) 2018: Defence Investment Plan 2018. Ensuring the Canadian Armed Forces is well-equipped and well-supported, Ottawa, in: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/dnd-mdn/documents/reports/2018/defence-i nvestment-plan-eng.pdf; 20.9.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  171. Canadian Department of National Defence (Canadian DND) 2020: Defence Energy and Environment Strategy 2020-2023, Ottawa, in: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/dnd-mdn/images/dees2020/2020-23%20Defence%20Energy%20and%20Environment%20 Strategy_EN%20-%20Signed.pdf; 30.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  172. Closson, Stacy 2019: The impact of climate change on Russian Arctic security, in: Kanet, Rodger (Hrsg.): Routlege Handbook of Russian Security, London, 369-381. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  173. CNA Military Advisory Board 2007: National Security and Threat of Climate Change, Alexandria, Virginia, in: https://www.cna.org/CNA_files/pdf/National%20Security%20and%2 0the%20Threat%20of%20Climate%20Change.pdf; 20.9.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  174. Corry, Olaf 2012: Securitisation and ‘Riskification’: Second-order Security and the Politics of Climate Change, in: Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40: 2, 235-258. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  175. Corry, Olaf 2014: From Defense to Resilience: Environmental Security beyond Neo-liberalism, in: International Political Sociology 8: 3, 256-274. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  176. Cox, Kate/Knack, Anna/Robson, Martin/Adger, Neil/Paillé, Pauline/Freeman, Jon/Black, James/Harris, Ruth 2020: A Changing Climate, Cambridge, in: https://assets.publishing.se rvice.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/930787/dcdc_report_changing_climate_gsp_RR-A487.pdf; 5.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  177. Crawford, Neta C. 2019: Pentagon Fuel Use, Climate Change, and Costs of War, Boston. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  178. Crisis Management and Disaster Response Centre of Excellence (CMDR COE) 2020: Annual Booklet 2020-2021, in: https://www.cmdrcoe.org/fls/pubs/Annual_booklet_2020-2021.p df; 17.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  179. Daase, Christopher 2002: Internationale Risikopolitik. Ein Forschungsprogramm für den sicherheitspolitischen Paradigmenwechsel, in: Daase, Christopher/Feske, Susanne/Peters, Ingo (Hrsg.): Internationale Risikopolitik. Der Umgang mit neuen Gefahren in den internationalen Beziehungen, Baden-Baden, 9-35. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  180. Dean, Mitchell M. 2009: Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  181. Del Castillo Pantoja, Guillermo 2019: Adaptación al Cambio Climático, un desafío para la defensa, Santiago de Chile, in: https://www.anepe.cl/wp-content/uploads/Cuaderno-de-T rabajo-N°2-2019.pdf; 26.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  182. Dröge, Susanne 2018: Klimawandel als Sicherheitsproblem. Prioritäten für Deutschlands Sicherheitsratssitz 2019–2020, in: SWP Aktuell 2018: 49, 1-8, in: https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/aktuell/2018A49_Dge.pdf; 8.10.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  183. Einecker, Rachel/Kirby, Andrew 2020: Climate Change. A Bibliometric Study of Adaptation, Mitigation and Resilience, in: Sustainability 12: 17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  184. Estève, Adrien 2020: Preparing the French military to a warming world: climatization through riskification, in: International Politics, 1-19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  185. Fernandez Romero, José M. 2015: The Spanish Emergency Military Unit. Military Capabilities in a Civil Environment, Kansas. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  186. Fischer, Susanne 2016: Risiko und Risikokultur. Konzepte für die Beschreibung und Analyse des gesellschaftlichen Umgangs mit Unsicherheit, in: Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik 9: 2, 191-200. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  187. Foley, Catherine 2012: Military Basing and Climate Change (American Security Project), Washington D.C. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  188. Foresight 2011: International Dimensions of Climate Change, London, in: https://assets.publis hing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/287853/11-1042-international-dimensions-of-climate-change.pdf; 20.9.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  189. French Ministre of Foreign Affairs and International Development 2015: The Crisis and Support Centre Emergency diplomacy, Paris, in: https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr /IMG/pdf/b r-cdcs-gb-09-09-2015_cle42b42c.pdf; 25.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  190. Gemenne, François/Alex, Bastien/Baillat, Alice 2019: Implications of Climate Change on Defence and Security in the South Pacific by 2030, Paris, in: https://climateandsecurity.file s.wordpress.com/2019/07/obs_climat-et-dc3a9fense_201 905-re-implications-of-climate-change-in-the-south-pacific-by-2030-spdmm-report.pdf; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  191. Gero, Anna/Fletcher, Stephanie/Rumsey, Michele/Thiessen, Jodi/Kuruppu, Natasha/Buchan, James/Daly, John/Willets, Juliet 2013: Disaster response and climate chnage in the Pacific, Gold Coast. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  192. Hartmann, Betsy 2010: Rethinking climate refugees and climate conflict: Rhetoric, reality and the politics of policy discourse, in: Journal of International Development 22: 2, 233-246. Hegre, Håvard/Allansson, Marie/Basedau, Matthias/Colaresi, Michael/Croicu, Mihai/Fjelde, Hanne/Hoyles, Frederick/Hultman, Lisa/Högbladh, Stina/Jansen, Remco/Mouhleb, Naima/Muhammad, Sayyed A./Nilsson, Desirée/Nygård, Håvard M./Olafsdottir, Gudlaug/ Petrova, Kristina/Randahl, David/Rød, Espen G./Schneider, Gerald/Uexkull, Nina von/ Vestby, Jonas 2019: ViEWS: A political violence early-warning system, in: Journal of Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  193. Peace Research 56: 2, 155-174. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  194. Heng, Yee-Kuang 2018: The continuing resonance of the war as risk management perspective for understanding military interventions, in: Contemporary Security Policy 39: 4, 544-558. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  195. Holloway, Jane/Thomas Michael Durant/Dirramt, Cheryl 2015: Strategic Military Geography: Climate Change Adaptation and the Military., in: Leal Filho W. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation, Berlin, Heidelberg, 493-514. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  196. Hsiang, Solomon M./Burke, Marshall/Miguel, Edward 2013: Quantifying the influence of climate on human conflict, in: Science 341: 6151, 1235367. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  197. International Energy Agency (IEA) 2020: Global Energy Review 2020, Paris, in: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2020/global-energy-and-co2-emissions-in-2020; 7.12.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  198. IPCC 2018: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, Genf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  199. Jarvis, Darryl 2008: Conceptualizing, Analyzing and Measuring Political Risk. The Evolution of Theory and Method (Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper, No. LKYSPP08). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  200. Jarvis, Darryl/Griffiths, Martin 2007: Learning to Fly: The Evolution of Political Risk Analysis, in: Global Society 21: 1, 5-21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  201. Jayaram, Dhanasree 2020: ‘Climatizing’ military strategy? A case study of the Indian armed forces, in: International Politics 2020, 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  202. Kelly, Terry P. 1990: Global climate change implications for the United States Navy, Newport. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  203. Keohane, Robert O. 1988: International Institutions: Two Approaches, in: International Studies Quarterly 32: 4, 379-396. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  204. Light, Sarah E. 2014: The Military-Environmental Complex, in: Boston College Law Review 55: 3, 879-946. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  205. Lippert, Tyler H. 2016: NATO, Climate Change, and International Security: A Risk Governance Approach, Santa Monica. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  206. Lock, Edward 2018: Strategic Culture Theory. What, Why, and How: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  207. von Lucke, Franziskus 2020: The Securitisation of Climate Change and the Governmentalisation of Security, Cham. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  208. von Lucke, Franziskus/Wellmann, Zehra/Diez, Thomas 2014: What’s at Stake in Securitising Climate Change? Towards a Differentiated Approach, in: Geopolitics 19: 4, 857-884. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  209. Machiavelli, Niccolò 2010 [1531]: Discourses on Livy (World’s classics), New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  210. Machiavelli, Niccolò 2013 [1513]: Der Fürst, Hamburg. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  211. McDonald, Matt 2013: Discourses of climate security, in: Political Geography 33, 42-51. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  212. McLean, Craig/Patterson, Alan/Williams, John 2009: Risk Assessment, Policy-Making and the Limits of Knowledge. The Precautionary Principle and International Relations, in: International Relations 23: 4, 548-566. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  213. Methmann, Chris/Oels, Angela 2015: From ‘fearing’ to ‘empowering’ climate refugees: Governing climate-induced migration in the name of resilience, in: Security Dialogue 46: 1, 51-68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  214. Ministère des Armées 2017: Defence and National Security. Strategic Review 2017, Paris, in: https://espas.secure.europarl.europa.eu/orbis/sites/default/files/generated/document/en/D EFENCE%20AND%20NATIONAL%20SECURITY%20STRATEGIC%20REVIEW% 202017.pdf; 8.10.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  215. Ministère des Armées 2018: Défense et Climat. La France s'engage, Paris, in: https://www.def ense.gouv.fr/content/download/539178/9257163/file/Plaquette-DefClim-2018.pdf; 8.10.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  216. NATO 2017: Forsight Strategic Analysis. 2017 Report 2017, in: https://www.act.nato.int/imag es/stories/media/doclibrary/171004_sfa_2017_report_hr.pdf; 5.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  217. New Zealand Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (New Zealand DPMC): Briefing to the Incoming Minister of Civil Defence June 2019, in: https://www.civildefence. govt.nz/assets/Uploads/publications/Briefing-to-the-Incoming-Minister-of-Civil-Defence -Ju ne-2019.pdf; 25.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  218. New Zealand Ministry of Defence (New Zealand MoD) 2018: The climate crisis: Defence readiness and responsibilties, Wellington, in: https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress. co m/2018/12/new-zealand_climate-change-and-security-2018.pdf; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  219. New Zealand Ministry of Defence (New Zealand MoD) 2019a: Advancing Pacific Partnerships 2019, in: https://www.defence.govt.nz/assets/publication/file/5f6dd307e7/Adva ncing-Pacific-Partnerships-2019.pdf; 18.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  220. New Zealand Ministry of Defence (New Zealand MoD) 2019b: Defence Capability Plan 2019, Wellington, in: https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/new-zealand-def ence-capability-plan-2019.pdf; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  221. New Zealand Ministry of Defence (New Zealand MoD) 2019c: Responding to the Climate Crisis. An Implementation Plan, Wellington, in: https://climateandsecurity.org/wp-conte nt/uploads/2019/12/nz-defence_responding-to-the-climate-crisis_2019.pdf; 11.10.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  222. Oels, Angela 2012: From ‘Securitization’ of Climate Change to ’Climatization‘ of the Security Field: Comparing Three Theoretical Perspectives, in: Scheffran, Jürgen/Brzoska, Michael/Brauch, Hans G./Link, Peter M./Schilling, Janpeter (Hrsg.): Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict, Berlin, Heidelberg, 185-205. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  223. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USDP) 2019: Department of Defense Arctic Strategy, Virginia, in: https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com /2019/06/20 19-dod-arctic-strategy.pdf; 04.9.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  224. O'Malley, Pat 2011: Security after Risk: Security Strategies for Governing Extreme Uncertainty, in: Current Issues in Criminal Justice 23: 1, 5-15. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  225. Petersen, Karen L. 2012: Risk analysis – A field within security studies?, in: European Journal of International Relations 18: 4, 693-717. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  226. Pinson, A. O./White, K. D./Moore, S. A./Samuelson, S. D./Thames, B. A./O'Brien, P. S./Hiemstra, C. A./Loechl, P. M./Ritchie, E. E. 2020: Army Climate Resilience Handbook, Washington D. C. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  227. Prokopf, Christine 2020: Handeln vor der Katastrophe als politische Herausforderung, Baden- Baden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  228. Schmitt, Carl 2018 [1933]: Der Begriff des Politischen. Synoptische Darstellung der Texte, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  229. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 2020 [1942]: Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie (utb Ökonomie, Soziologie, Politikwissenschaften), Tübingen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  230. Sergunin, Alexander/Konyshev, Valery 2017: Russian military strategies in the Arctic. Change or continuity?, in: European Security 26: 2, 171-189. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  231. Sottilotta, Cecilia E. 2016: Rethinking political risk: concepts, theories, challenges, London, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  232. Spanish Institute for Strategic Studies 2018: Strategic Dossiers 193B. Climate Change and its impact on defense, Madrid, in: www.ieee.es/en/Galerias/fichero/cuadernos/CE_193-B_ CLIMATE_CHANGE_AND_ITS_IMPACT_ON_DEFENSE.pdf; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  233. Stein, Bruce A./Lawson, Dawn M./Glick, Patty/Wolf, Christy M./Enquist, Carolyn 2019: Climate Adaptation for DoD Natural Resource Managers. A Guide to Incorporating Climate Considerations into Integrated Natural Resource Management Plans. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  234. Stoltenberg, Jens 2020: NATO must combat climate change, Brüssel. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  235. Theisen, Ole M./Gleditsch, Nils P./Buhaug, Halvard 2013: Is climate change a driver of armed conflict?, in: Climatic Change 117: 3, 613-625. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  236. Trombetta, Maria J. 2012: Climate Change and the Environmental Conflict Discourse, in: Scheffran, Jürgen/Brzoska, Michael/Brauch, Hans G./Link, Peter M./Schilling, Janpeter (Hrsg.): Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict, Berlin, Heidelberg, 151-164. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  237. UN News 2019: Climate change recognized as ‘threat multiplier’, UN Security Council debates its impact on peace, New York, in: https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/01/1031322; 7.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  238. United Kingdom Minstry of Defence (UK MoD) 2018a: Global Strategic Trends. The Future Starts Today, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  239. United Kingdom Minstry of Defence (UK MoD) 2018b: Sustainable MOD. Annual Report 2017/18, London, in: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-sustainability-a nd-environmental-appraisal-tool-handbook; 8.10.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  240. United Kingdom Minstry of Defence (UK MoD) 2019: climate impacts riks assessment method, London, in: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/u ploads/ attachment_data/file/842735/20191003-Section_7-CIRAM-O.pdf; 22.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  241. United States Coast Guard 2019: Arctic Strategic Outlook. The United states Coast Guard's Vision for the Arctic Region, Washington D. C., in: https://www.uscg.mil/Portals/0 /Ima ges/arctic/Arctic_Strategic_Outlook_APR_2019.pdf; 8.10.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  242. United States Department of Defense (US DoD) 2014a: 2014 Climate Change. Adaptation Roadmap, Virginia, in: http://web.archive.org/web/20170130025548/https:// www.dhs.g ov/sites/default/files/publications/Appendix%20A%20DHS%20FY2012%20Climate%2 0Change%20Adaptation%20Plan_0.pdf; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  243. United States Department of Defense (US DoD) 2014b: Quadrennial Defense Review 2014, in: https://archive.defense.gov/pubs/2014_Quadrennial_Defense_Review.pdf; 22.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  244. United States Department of Defense (US DoD) 2015a: National Security Implications of Climate-Related Risiks and a Changing Climate, Virginia, in: https://archive.defense.gov/ p ubs/150724-congressional-report-on-national-implications-of-climate-change.pdf; 29.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  245. United States Department of Defense (US DoD) 2015b: Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan 2015, in: https://www.denix.osd.mil/sustainability/dod-sspp/unassigned/dod-sspp-f y-2015/; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  246. United States Department of Defense (US DoD) 2019: Report on Effects of a Changing Climate to the Department of Defense, Virginia, in: https://climateandsecurity.files. wordpress.com/2019/01/sec_335_ndaa-report_effects_of_a_changing_climate_to_dod. pdf; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  247. United States Department of Defense (US DoD) 2020: Strategic Sustainability Report & Implementation Plan. 2020, in: https://www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/dod-2020-sustainability-plan.pdf; 5.11.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  248. United States Department of Homeland Security 2013: Climate Action Plan, Washington D. C., in: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/DHS%20Climate%20Action Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  249. %20 Plan.pdf; 26.8.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  250. Werrell, Caitlin E./Femia, Francesco 2015: Climate Change as Threat Multiplier. Understanding the Broader Nature of the Risk, in: Center for Climate and Security Briefer 2015: 25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  251. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen 2007: Welt im Wandel. Sicherheitsrisiko Klimawandel, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-34
  252. Abendroth, Maryann/Figley, Charles 2013: Vicarious trauma and the therapeutic relationship, in: Murphy, David/Joseph, Stephan/ Harris, Belinda (Hrsg.): Trauma and the therapeutic relationship. Approaches to process and practice, London, 111-125. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  253. Aday, Sean 2010: Leading the charge. Media, elites, and the use of emotion in stimulating rally effects in wartime, in: Journal of Communication 60:3, 440-465. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  254. Bankoff, Greg/Frerks, Georg/Hilhorst, Dorothea (Hrsg.) 2013: Mapping Vulnerability. Disasters, Development and People, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  255. Barnett, Michael 1997: The UN Security Council, indifference, and genocide in Rwanda, in: Cultural Anthropology 12:4, 551-578. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  256. Bartholow, Bruce/Bushman, Brad/Sestir, Marc 2006: Chronic violent video game exposure and desensitization to violence. Behavioral and event-related brain potential data, in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42:4, 532-539. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  257. Bellamy, Alex/Wheeler, Nicholas 2008: Humanitarian intervention in world politics, in: The globalization of world politics, 522-538. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  258. Biermann, Rafael 2014: Legitimitätsprobleme humanitärer Intervention. Kontinuitätslinien zwischen Kosovo und Libyen, in: Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 3:1, 6-42. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  259. Binder, Martin 2017: The United Nations and the Politics of Selective Humanitarian Intervention, Basingstoke. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  260. Boczkowski, Pablo/Mitchelstein, Eugenia/Matassi, Mora 2018: “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”. Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media, in: New Media & Society 20:10, 3523-3539. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  261. Bonacker, Thorsten/Brodocz, André 2001: Im Namen der Menschenrechte. Zur symbolischen Integration der internationalen Gemeinschaft durch Normen, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 8:2, 179-208. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  262. Brantner, Cornelia/Lobinger, Katherina/Wetzstein, Irmgard 2011: Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza conflict 2009, in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 88:3, 523-540. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  263. Bride, Brian/Radey, Melissa/Figley, Charles 2007: Measuring compassion fatigue, in: Clinical Social Work Journal 35:3, 155-163. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  264. Bucher, Jessica/Engel, Lena/Harfensteller, Stephanie/Dijkstra, Hylke 2013: Domestic politics, news media and humanitarian intervention. Why France and Germany diverged over Libya, in: European Security 22:4, 524-539. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  265. Cameron, Daryl 2017: Compassion collapse. Why we are numb to numbers?, in: Seppala, Emma/Simon-Thomas, Emiliana/Brown, Stephanie L./Worline, Monica C./Cameron, C. Daryl/Doty, James Robert (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Compassion Science, London, 261-271. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  266. Carnagey, Nicholas/Anderson, Craig/Bushman, Brad 2007: The effect of video game violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence, in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:3, 489-496. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  267. Choi, Seung-Whan/James, Patrick 2016: Why does the United States intervene abroad? Democracy, human rights violations, and terrorism, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 60:5, 899-926. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  268. Coetzee, Siedine Knobloch/Klopper, Hester 2010: Compassion fatigue within nursing practice. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  269. A concept analysis, in: Nursing & Health Sciences 12:2, 235-243. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  270. Crilley, Rhys. 2018: “International relations in the age of ‘post-truth’ politics.” in: International Affairs 94:2, 417-425. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  271. Dhir, Amandeep/Yossatorn, Yossiri/ Kaur, Puneet/Chen, Sufen 2018: Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression, in: International Journal of Information Management 40, 141-152. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  272. Duffy, Emer/Avalos, Gloria /Dowling, Maura 2015: Secondary traumatic stress among emergency nurses. a cross-sectional study, in: International Emergency Nursing 23:2, 53-58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  273. Fanti, Kostas/Vanman, Eric/Henrich, Marios/Avraamides, Marios 2009: Desensitization to media violence over a short period of time, in: Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression 35:2, 179-187. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  274. Farkas, Johan/Schou, Jannick 2019: Post-truth, fake news and democracy. Mapping the politics of falsehood, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  275. Figley, Charles 1995: Compassion fatigue. Toward a new understanding of the costs of caring, in: Stamm, Hudnall (Hrsg.): Secondary traumatic stress. Self-care issues for clinicians, researchers, and educators, Derwood, 3–28. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  276. Figley, Charles 2002: Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists' chronic lack of self-care, in: Journal of clinical psychology 58:11, 1433-1441. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  277. Funk, Jeanne/Baldacci, Heidi/Pasold, Tracie/Baumgardner, Jennifer 2004: Violence exposure in real-life, video games, television, movies, and the internet. Is there desensitization?, in: Journal of Adolescence 27:1, 23-39. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  278. Garrett, Kelly 2009: Politically motivated reinforcement seeking. Reframing the selective exposure debate, in: Journal of communication 59:4, 676-699. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  279. Gilboa, Eytan 2005a: The CNN effect. The search for a communication theory of international relations, in: Political communication 22:1, 27-44. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  280. Gilboa, Eytan 2005b: Global television news and foreign policy. Debating the CNN effect, in: International Studies Perspectives 6:3, 325-341. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  281. Grillo, Michael/Pupcenoks, Juris 2017: Let’s Intervene! But Only If They’re Like Us. The Effects of Group Dynamics and Emotion on the Willingness to Support Humanitarian Intervention, in: International Interactions 43:2, 349-374. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  282. Hannan, Jason 2018: “Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics.”, in: European Journal of Communication 33:2, 214-226. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  283. Hasenclever, Andreas 2001: Die Macht der Moral in der internationalen Politik. Militärische Interventionen westlicher Staaten in Somalia, Ruanda und Bosnien-Herzegowina, Frankfurt. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  284. Hoffman, Aaron/Kaire, José 2020: Comfortably numb. effects of prolonged media coverage, in: Journal of conflict resolution 64:9, 1666-1692. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  285. Höijer, Brigitta 2004: The discourse of global compassion. The audience and media reporting of human suffering, in: Media, culture & society 26:4, 513-531. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  286. Holton, Avery/Chyi, Hsiang Iris 2012: News and the overloaded consumer. Factors influencing information overload among news consumers, in: Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking 15:11, 619-624. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  287. Jakobsen, Peter 2000: Focus on the CNN effect misses the point. The real media impact on conflict management is invisible and indirect, in: Journal of Peace Research 37:2, 131-143. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  288. Kapyla, Juha/Kennedy, Denis 2014: Cruel to Care. Investigating the Governance of Compassion in the Humanitarian Imaginary, in: International Theory 6:2, 255. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  289. Krahé, Barbara/Möller, Ingrid/Huesmann, Rowell/Kirwil, Lucyna/Felber, Juliane/Berger, Anja 2011: Desensitization to media violence. Links with habitual media violence exposure, aggressive cognitions, and aggressive behavior, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100:4, 630-646. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  290. Kreps, Sarah/Maxey, Sarah 2018: Mechanisms of Morality. Sources of Support for Humanitarian Intervention, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 62:8, 1814-1842. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  291. Lee, Sun/Lindsey, Nathan/Kim, Kyun 2017: The effects of news consumption via social media and news information overload on perceptions of journalistic norms and practices, in: Computers in Human Behavior 75, 254-263. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  292. Livingston, Steven 1997: Beyond the “CNN effect”. The media-foreign policy dynamic, in: Pippa, Norris (Hrsg.): Politics and the press: The news media and their influences, Boulder, 291-318. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  293. Loh, Kep Kee/Kanai, Ryota 2016: How has the Internet reshaped human cognition?, in: The Neuroscientist 22:5, 506-520. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  294. Markowitz, Ezra/Slovic, Paul/Västfjäll, Daniel/Hodges, Sara 2013: Compassion fade and the challenge of environmental conservation, in: Judgment and Decision Making 8:4, 397-406. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  295. Moeller, Susan 1998: Compassion Fatigue: How the Media Sell Disease, War and Death, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  296. Moeller, Susan 2018: Compassion fatigue, in: Bleiker, Roland (Hrsg.): Visual global politics, London, 75-80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  297. Moke, Markus/Rüther, Maria 2013: Humanitäre Hilfe und Medien, in: Handbuch Humanitäre Hilfe, 171-182. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  298. Morrison, Lindy/Joy, Jane 2016: Secondary traumatic stress in the emergency department, in: Journal of advanced nursing 72:11, 2894-2906. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  299. Mullin, Charles/Linz, Daniel 1995: Desensitization and resensitization to violence against women. Effects of exposure to sexually violent films on judgments of domestic violence victims, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:3, 449-459. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  300. Olsen, Gorm Rye/Carstensen, Nils/Høyen, Kristian 2003: Humanitarian crises: What determines the level of emergency assistance? Media coverage, donor interests and the aid business, in: Disasters 27:2, 109-126. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  301. Ott, Brian 2017: The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement, in: Critical Studies in Media Communication 34:1, 59-68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  302. Pentina, Iryna/Tarafdar, Monideepa 2014: From “information” to “knowing”. Exploring the role of social media in contemporary news consumption, in: Computers in Human Behavior 35, 211-223. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  303. Perse, Elizabeth/Lambe, Jennifer 2016: Media Effects and Society, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  304. Richards, Sarah 2020: Why our minds can’t make sense of COVID-19’s enormous death toll (National Geographic, 20.9.2020), in: www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/09/w hy-minds-brains-cannot-make-sense-coronavirus-enormous-death-toll/, 2.8.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  305. Robinson, Piers 1999: The CNN effect. Can the news media drive foreign policy?, in: Review of international studies 25:2, 301-309. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  306. Robinson, Piers 2000: The policy-media interaction model. Measuring media power during humanitarian crisis, in: Journal of Peace Research 37:5, 613-633. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  307. Roffeis, Ulrike 2007: Sind Zeitungsleser „bessere“ Europäer? Eine Sekundäranalyse von Daten des Eurobarometers, in: Sozialwissenschaftlicher Fachinformationsdienst soFid, (Kommunikationswissenschaft 2007/2): 9-22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  308. Saakvitne, Karen/Pearlman, Laurie 1996: Transforming the pain. A workbook on vicarious traumatization, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  309. Sangar, Eric/Clément, Maéva/Lindemann, Thomas 2018: Of Heroes and Cowards. A Computer-Based Analysis of Narratives Justifying the Use of Force, in: Sangar, Eric/Maéva, Clément (Hrsg.): Researching Emotions in International Relations, Cham, 179-206. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  310. Scharrer, Erica 2008: Media exposure and sensitivity to violence in news reports. Evidence of desensitization?, in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 85:2, 291-310. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  311. Schmitt, Josephine/Debbelt, Christina/Schneider, Frank 2018: Too much information? Predictors of information overload in the context of online news exposure, in: Information, Communication & Society 21:8, 1151-1167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  312. Shea, Patrick/Christian, Charlotte 2017: The Impact of Women Legislators on Humanitarian Military Interventions, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 61:10, 2043-2073. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  313. Simas, Elisabeth/Clifford, Scott/Kirkland, Justin 2020: How Empathic Concern Fuels Political Polarization, in: American Political Science Review 114:1, 258-269. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  314. Soderlund, Walter/Briggs, Donald/Hildebrandt, Kai/Sidahmed, Abdel Salam 2008: Humanitarian crises and intervention: Reassessing the impact of mass media, West Hartford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  315. Sorenson, Claire/Bolick, Beth/Wright, Karen/Hamilton, Rebekah 2016: Understanding compassion fatigue in healthcare providers. A review of current literature, in: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 48:5, 456-465. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  316. Strobel, Warren 1997: Late-breaking foreign policy. The news media’s influence on peace operations, Washington. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  317. Toff, Benjamin/Kalogeropoulos, Antonis 2020: All the News that’s Fit to Ignore: How the Information Environment Does and Does Not Shape News Avoidance, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 84:1, 366-390. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  318. Twenge, Jean/Campbell, Keith 2019: Media use is linked to lower psychological well-being. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  319. Evidence from three datasets, in: Psychiatric Quarterly 90:2, 311-331. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  320. Twenge, Jean/Martin, Gabrielle/Spitzberg, Brian 2019: Trends in US Adolescents’ media use 1976–2016. The rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print, in: Psychology of Popular Media Culture 8:4, 329-345. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  321. Van Meegdenburg, Hilde/Zangl, Bernhard/Daßler, Benjamin 2020: Humanitarian Interventions. Saving Close and Distant Strangers, in: Forschung Deutsche Stiftung Friedensforschung 53, 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  322. Wada, Hadiza Isa 2019: Media Consumption Trends. Comparing Millennials and Generation Z, in: Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies Working Papers, 58-65. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  323. Weiss, Thomas 2004: The sunset of humanitarian intervention? The responsibility to protect in a unipolar era, in: Security dialogue 35:2, 135-153. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  324. Yoder, Elisabeth 2010: Compassion fatigue in nurses, in: Applied nursing research 23:4, 191-197. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  325. York, Chance 2013: Overloaded by the news. Effects of news exposure and enjoyment on reporting information overload, in: Communication Research Reports 30:4, 282-292. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  326. Zangl, Bernhard 2002: Humanitäre Intervention, in: Ferdowsi, Mir (Hrsg.): Internationale Politik im 21. Jahrhundert, München, 105-122. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-64
  327. Adler, Emanuel/Drieschova, Alena 2021: The Epistemological Challenge of Truth-Subversion to the Liberal International Order, in: International Organization 75:2, 359–386. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  328. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca/Zarakol, Ayşe 2021: Struggles for recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents, in: International Organization 75:2, 611– 634. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  329. Barber, Michael J./Nolan McCarty 2015: Causes and Consequences of Polarization, in: Persily, Nathaniel (Hrsg.): Solutions to Political Polarization in America, New York, 42-44. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  330. Bendor, Jonathan/Shapiro, Jacob 2021: Big trends in American politics are making events like the U.S. Capitol violence more likely, in: Washington Post, 7.1.2021, https://www.wa shingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/07/big-trends-american-politics-are-making-events-li ke-us-capitol-violence-more-likely/; 1.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  331. Blum, Rachel 2020: How the Tea Party Captured the GOP: Insurgent Factions in American Politics, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  332. Blum, Rachel/Parker, Christopher 2019: Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right, in: Perspectives on Politics, 17:3, 737-755. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  333. Busby, Joshua/Monten, Jonathan 2018: Has Liberal Internationalism Been Trumped? In: Jervis, Robert/Gavin, Francis J./ Rovner, Joshua/Labrosse/Diane N. (Hrsg.): Chaos in the Liberal Order: The Trump Presidency and International Politics in the Twenty-First Century, New York, 49–60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  334. Carnegie, Allison/Carson, Austin 2019: Reckless Rhetoric? Compliance Pessimism and International Order in the Age of Trump, in: The Journal of Politics, 81:2, 739-746. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  335. Carter, Ralph G./Scott, James M.2009: Choosing To Lead: Understanding Congressional Foreign Policy Entrepreneurs, Durham. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  336. Campbell, James E. 2016: Polarized: Making Sense of a divided America, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  337. Chaudoin, Stephen/Milner, Helen V./Tingley, Dustin 2010: The Center Still Holds: Liberal Internationalism Survives, in: International Security 35:1, 75-94. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  338. Cooley, Alexander/Nexon, Daniel 2020: Exit from hegemony: the unraveling of the American global order, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  339. Colgan, Jeff D./Keohane, Robert O. 2017: The Liberal Order Is Rigged, in: Foreign Affairs, 96: 3, 36-44. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  340. Curry, James M./Lee, Frances E. 2020: The Limits of Party: Congress and Lawmaking in a Polarized Era, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  341. Czempiel, Ernst-Otto 1996: Kants Theorem. Oder: Warum sind Demokratien (noch immer) nicht friedlich? in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3:1, 79-101. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  342. Daase, Christopher/Kroll, Stefan (Hrsg.) 2019: Angriff auf die liberale Weltordnung. Die amerikanische Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik unter Donald Trump, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  343. Devlin, Kat/Silver, Laura/ Huang, Christine 2020: U.S. Views of China Increasingly Negative Amid Coronavirus Outbreak. PEW Research Center, last modified April 21, 2020, accessed January 11, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/04/21/u-s-views-of-china-increasingly-negative-amid-coronavirus-outbreak/; 1.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  344. Diamond, Larry J. 2019: Ill Winds: Saving Democracy from Russian Rage, Chinese Ambition, and American Complacenc, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  345. Dueck, Colin 2010: Hard Line: The Republican Party and US Foreign Policy Since World War II, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  346. Dueck, Colin 2006: Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  347. Drezner, Daniel W. 2019: This Time Is Different: Why U.S. Foreign Policy Will Never Recover, in: Foreign Affairs 98:3, 10-17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  348. Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, & Skocpol, Theda (Hrsg.) 1985: Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  349. Friedrichs, Gordon M. 2021: U.S. Global Leadership Role and Domestic Polarization: A Role Theory Approach, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  350. Goldstein, Judith/Gulotty, Robert 2021: Populism and Trade: The Institutional Roots of the Anti-Trade Backlash, in: International Organization (online first). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  351. Hebenstreit, Jörg 2020: Drain or Fill the Swamp? Entwicklungen im Bereich der Wahlkampffinanzierung unter Donald Trump, in: Böller, Florian et al. (Hrsg.). Donald Trump und die Politik in den USA. Eine Zwischenbilanz, Baden-Baden, 101-118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  352. Hetherington, Marc J./Rudolph Thomas J. 2015: Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  353. Hetherington, Marc J./Weiler Jonathan D. 2009: Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  354. Hochschild, Arlie Russell 2016: Strangers in their own land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  355. Homan, Patrick/Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2020: The Battle for U.S. Foreign Policy: Congress, Parties, and Factions in the 21st Century. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  356. Howell, William G./Moe, Terry M. 2020: Presidents, Populism, and the Crisis of Democracy, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  357. Hurst, Steven/Wroe, Andrew 2016: Partisan polarization and US foreign policy: Is the centre dead or holding? In: International Politics 53:5, 666-682. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  358. Ikenberry, G. John 2001: After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  359. Ikenberry, G. John 2011: Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  360. Ikenberry, G. John 1998: Constitutional Politics in International Relations, in: European Journal of International Relations 4:2, 147-177. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  361. Jeong, Gyung-Ho/Quirk Paul J. 2019: Division at the Water’s Edge: The Polarization of Foreign Policy, in: American Politics Research 47:1, 58-87. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  362. Klein, Ezra 2020: Why we’re Polarized, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  363. Kupchan, Charles/Trubowitz, Peter 2007: Dead Center: The Demise of Liberal Internationalism in the United States, in: International Security 32:2, 7-44. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  364. Lake, David/Martin, Lisa L./Risse, Thomas 2021: Challenges to the Liberal International Order: Reflections on International Organization, in: International Organization 75:2, 225– 257. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  365. Lammert, Christian 2020: Trump und die Krise der Demokratie in den USA, in: Böller, Florian et al. (Hrsg.): Donald Trump und die Politik in den USA. Eine Zwischenbilanz, Baden-Baden, 175-188. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  366. Lee, Frances E. 2015: How Party Polarization Affects Governance, in: Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 261-282. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  367. Legro, Jeffrey 2005: Rethinking the world: great power strategies and international order, Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  368. Ljunggren, Börje 2020: From Obama to Trump, and beyond: Washington’s painful search for a credible China policy, in: Turner, Oliver/Parmar, Inderjeet (Hrsg.): United States in the Indo-Pacific: Obama's legacy and the Trump transition, Manchester, 195-209. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  369. Lippert, Barbara/von Ondarza, Nicolai/Perthes, Volker 2019: Strategische Autonomie Europas Akteure, Handlungsfelder, Zielkonflikte, in: SWP Studie 2, https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2019S02/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  370. Marsh, Kevin/Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2016: Are All Foreign Policy Innovators Created Equal? The New Generation of Congressional Foreign Policy Entrepreneurship, in: Foreign Policy Analysis 0, 1-23. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  371. Mastanduno, Michael 2020: A grand strategic transition? Obama, Trump and the Asia Pacific political economy, in: Turner, Oliver/Parmar, Inderjeet (Hrsg.): United States in the Indo-Pacific: Obama's legacy and the Trump transition, Manchester, 177-192. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  372. McCarty, Nolan/ Poole, Keith T./Rosenthal, Howard 2016: Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  373. Mearsheimer, John J. 2001: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W.W. Norton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  374. Medick-Krakau, Monika (Hrsg.) 1999: Außenpolitischer Wandel in theoretischer und vergleichender Perspektive. Die USA und die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  375. Milner, Helen V./Tingley, Dustin 2015: Sailing the Water’s Edge: The Domestic Politics of American Foreign Policy, Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  376. Myrick, Rachel 2021: Do External Threats Unite or Divide? Security Crises, Rivalries, and Polarization in American Foreign Policy, in: International Organization (online first). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  377. Musgrave, Paul 2019: International Hegemony Meets Domestic Politics: Why Liberals can be Pessimists, Security Studies 28:3, 451-478. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  378. Mutz, Diana C. 2018: Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115:19, E4330–E4339. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  379. Nau, Henry R. 2002: At Home Abroad: Identity and Power in American Foreign Policy, Ithaca. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  380. Nichols, Tom 2017: The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  381. Noack, Rick 2019: Trump has a lot to say about Brexit. But do Brits listen? Washington Post, September 2, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/09/02/trump-has-lot-s Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  382. ay-about-brexit-do-brits-listen/; 1.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  383. Norris, Pippa 2020: It Happened in America. Democratic Backsliding Shouldn’t Have Come as a Surprise, in: Foreign Affairs, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2 021-01-07/it-happened-america; 7.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  384. Norris, Pippa/Inglehart Ronald 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  385. Norrlof, Carla 2018: Hegemony and inequality: Trump and the liberal playbook, in: International Affairs 94:1, 63-88. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  386. Norrlof, Carla 2020: Is covid-19 a liberal democratic curse? Risks for liberal international order, in: International Affairs 33:5, 799-813. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  387. Page, Benjamin I./Gilens, Martin 2020: Democracy in America? What Has Gone Wrong and What We Can Do About It. Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  388. Patel, Kevin/Hansmeyer, Christian 2020: Multilateralism to transactionalism: America and Trump in the Asia Pacific, in: Turner, Oliver/Parmar, Inderjeet (Hrsg.): United States in the Indo-Pacific: Obama's legacy and the Trump transition, Manchester, 210-224. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  389. Peake, Jeffrey S./Krutz, Glen S. /Hughes, Tyler 2012: President Obama, the Senate, and the Polarized Politics of Treaty Making, in: Social Science Quarterly 93:5, 1295-1315. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  390. Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2017: Dis-embedding Liberal Internationalism (October 16, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3054001 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  391. .3054001; 17.6.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  392. Pape, Robert A. 2005: Soft Balancing against the United States, in: International Security, 30:1, 7-45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  393. Parmar, Inderjeet/Turner, Oliver 2020: Conclusion: Legacies and Transitions in the twenty- first century Indo-Pacific, in: Turner/Parmar 2020, 241-252. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  394. Pew Research Center 2019: Trust and Distrust in America, in: https://www.pewresearch.org/p olitics/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/07/PEW-RESEARCH-CENTER_TRUST-DIST RUST-IN-AMERICA-REPORT_2019-07-22-1.pdf; 1.3.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  395. Rapp-Hooper, Mira/Waxman, Matthew C. 2019: Presidential Alliance Powers, in: The Washington Quarterly 42:2, 67-83. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  396. Rapport, Aaron/Rathbun, Brian 2020: Parties to an alliance: Ideology and the domestic politics of international institutionalization, in: Journal of Peace Research 58:2, 279-293. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  397. Rathbun, Brian 2013: Steeped in international affairs? The foreign policy views of the tea party. Foreign Policy Analysis 9:1, 21–37. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  398. Schultz, Kenneth A. 2017: Perils of Polarization for U.S. Foreign Policy, in: The Washington Quarterly 40:4, 7-28. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  399. Schweller, Randall 2018: Three Cheers for Trump’s Foreign Policy: What the Establishment Misses, in: Foreign Affairs 97:5, 133-143. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  400. Snyder, Jack/ Shapiro, Robert Y./Bloch-Elkon, Yaeli 2009: Free Hand Abroad, Divide and Rule at Home, in: World Politics 61:1, 155-187. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  401. Steff, Reuben 2021: US foreign policy in the age of Trump: drivers, strategy and tactics, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  402. Tama, Jordan 2020: Forcing the President's Hand: How the US Congress Shapes Foreign Policy through Sanctions Legislation, in: Foreign Policy Analysis 16 (3): 397-416. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  403. Thompson, John A. 2015: A Sense of Power: The Roots of America’s Global Role, Ithaca. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  404. Thurber, James A./Yoshinaka, Antoine 2016: American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  405. Trubowitz, Peter/Harris, Peter 2019: The end of the American century? Slow erosion of the domestic sources of usable power, International Affairs 95:3, 619-639. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  406. Trubowitz, Peter/Mellow, Nicole 2011: Foreign policy, bipartisanship and the paradox of post- September 11 America, in: International Politics 48:2/3, 164-187. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  407. Trump, Donald J. 2016: Transcript: Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy Speech, in: New York Times, 27 April 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/us/politics/transcript-trump-foreign-policy.html? 1.2.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  408. Turner, Oliver/Parmar, Inderjeet (Hrsg.) 2020: United States in the Indo-Pacific: Obama's legacy and the Trump transition, Manchester. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  409. Walt, Stephen 2018: The Hell of Good Intentions: America's Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-83
  410. Abay Gaspar, Hande 2020: Salafist Groups’ use of Social Media and its Implications for Prevention, in: https://gnet-research.org/2020/04/28/salafist-groups-use-of-social-media- and-its-implications-for-prevention/. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  411. Barry, Jack J. 2017: Social Movements in the Digital Age, in: Monshipouri, Mahmood (Hrsg.): Information Politics, Protests, and Human Rights in the Digital Age, Cambridge, 23-49. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  412. Baylis, John/Steve, Smith/Patricia, Owens 2017: The Globalization of World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations, 7. Auflage, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  413. Beisch, Natalie/Schäfer, Carmen 2020: Internetnutzung mit großer Dynamik: Medien, Kommunikation, Social Media: Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2020, in: Media Perspektiven: 9/2020, 462-481. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  414. Bennett, Andrew 2015: Found in Translation: Combining Discourse Analysis with Computer Assisted Content Analysis, in: Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43: 3, 984-997. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  415. Bennett, W. Lance/ Segerberg, Alexandra 2012: The Logic of Connective Action, in: Information, Communication & Society, 15: 5, 739-768. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  416. Bjola, Corneliu 2016: Getting digital diplomacy right: what quantum theory can teach us about measuring impact, in: Global Affairs 2: 3, 343-353. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  417. Bleiker Roland 2001: The Aesthetic Turn in International Political Theory, in: Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30: 3, 509-533. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  418. Bleiker Roland 2015: Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics, in: Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43: 3, 872-890. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  419. Bleiker, Roland (Hrsg.) 2018: Visual Global Politics, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  420. Bleiker, Roland 2019: Writing Visual Global Politics: in Defence of a Pluralist Approach – a Response to Gabi Schlag, “Thinking and Writing Visual Global Politics”, in: International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 32:1, 115–123. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  421. Carpenter, Charli/Drezner, Daniel W. 2010: International Relations 2.0: The Implications of New Media for an Old Profession, in: International Studies Perspectives 11: 3, 255-272. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  422. Cogburn, Derrick L./Espinoza-Vasquez, Fatima K. 2011: From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign, in: Journal of Political Marketing 10: 1-2, 189-213. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  423. Cornfield, Michael 2017: Empowering the party-crasher: Donald J. Trump, the first 2016 GOP presidential debate, and the Twitter marketplace for political campaigns, in: Journal of Political Marketing 16: 3-4, 212-243. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  424. Deibert, Ronald/Rohozinski, Rafal 2010: Liberation vs. Control: The Future of Cyberspace, in: Journal of Democracy 21: 4, 43-57. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  425. DeNardis, Laura/Andrea M. Hackl 2015: Internetgovernance by social mediaplatforms, in: Telecommunications Policy 39: 9, 761-770. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  426. Dencik, Lisa/Oliver Leistert (Hrsg.) 2015: Critical Perspectives on Social Media and Protest. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  427. Between Control and Emancipation, London & New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  428. Deverell, Edward/Olsson, Eva-Karin/Wagnsson, Charlotte/Hellman, Maria/Johnsson, Magnus 2015: Understanding public agency communication: the case of the Swedish armed forces, in: Journal of Public Affairs 15: 4, 387-396. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  429. DiPLO 2016: Social media – Factsheet of Foreign Ministries (Diplomacy), in: https://www.di plomacy.edu/sites/default/files/E-diplomacy%20infographic%20-%20DiploFoundation%202016.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  430. Drezner, Daniel W. 2010: Weighing the Scales: The Internet’s Effect on State-Society Relations, in: Brown Journal of World Affairs 16: 2, 31-44. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  431. Duncombe, Constance 2017: Twitter and transformative diplomacy: social media and Iran–US relations, in: International Affairs 93: 3, 545–562. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  432. Dunne, Tim/Kurki, Milja/Smith, Steve 2010: International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, 2. Auflage, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  433. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2021: IO public communication going digital? Understanding social media adoption and use in times of politicization, in: Zaiotti, Ruben/Bjola, Corneliu (Hrsg.): The Digital Diplomacy of International Organizations: Autonomy, Legitimacy and Contestation in the Global Digital Age, London, 21-50. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  434. Farrell, Henry/Drezner, Daniel W. 2008: The power and politics of blogs, in: Public Choice 134: 1-2, 15-30. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  435. Goritz, Alexandra/Nina Kolleck/Helge Jörgens 2019a: Analyzing Twitter Data: Advantages and Challenges in the Study of UN Climate Negotiations. SAGE Research Methods Cases. DOI: 10.4135/9781526472441. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  436. Goritz, Alexandra/Nina Kolleck/Helge Jörgens 2019b: Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change Education: The Potential of Social Network Analysis Based on Twitter Data, in: Sustainability 11(5499). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  437. Grieco, Joseph/Ikenberry, G. John/Mastanduno, Michael 2015: Introduction to International Relations. Enduring Questions & Contemporary Perspectives, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  438. Hall, Nina/Schmitz, Hans Peter/Deadmon, J. Michael 2020: Transnational Advocacy and NGOs in the Digital Era: New Forms of Networked Power, in: International Studies Quarterly 64: 1, 159-167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  439. Hintz, Arne/Dencik, Lina/Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin 2017: Digital Citizenship and Surveillance Society, in: International Journal of Communication 11, 731–739. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  440. Hofferberth, Matthias 2021: Tweeting to Save Succeeding Generations from the Scourge of War? The UN, Twitter and Communicative Action, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Zaiotti, Ruben (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations. Autonomy, Legitimacy and Contestation, London, 155-183. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  441. Jackson, Susan T/Crilley, Rhys/Manor, Ilan/Baker, Catherine/ Oshikoya, Modupe/Joachim, Jutta/Robinson, Nick/Schneiker, Andrea/Sunday Grove, Nicole/Enloe, Cynthia 2020: Forum: Militarization 2.0: Communication and the Normalization of Political Violence in the Digital Age, in: International Studies Review, 23: 3, 1046-1071. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  442. Jackson, Susan T. 2019a: A Turning IR Landscape in a Shifting Media Ecology: The State of IR Literature on New Media, in: International Studies Review 21: 3, 518–534. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  443. Jackson, Susan T. 2019b: ‘Selling’ national security: Saab, YouTube, and the militarized neutrality of Swedish citizen identity, in: Critical Military Studies, 5: 3, 257-275. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  444. Kaempf, Sebastian 2019: ‘A relationship of mutual exploitation’: the evolving ties between the Pentagon, Hollywood, and the commercial gaming sector, in: Social Identities 25: 4, 542–558. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  445. Kaplan, Andreas/Haenlein, Michael 2010: Users of the world, unite! The challenge and opportunities of Social Media, in: Business Horizons. 53, 59-68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  446. Klausen, Jytte 2015: Tweeting the Jihad: Social Media Networks of Western Foreign Fighters in Syria and Iraq, in: Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 38: 1, 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  447. Klinger, Ulrike/Svensson, Jakob 2015: The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach, in: New Media & Society 17: 8, 1241-1257. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  448. Koch, Wolfgang/Beisch, Natalie 2020: Erneut starke Zuwächse bei Onlinevideo: Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2020, in: Media Perspektiven: 9, 482-500. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  449. König, Mathias/König, Wolfgang 2019: Soziale Medien (Social Media), in: Klenk, Tanja/Nullmeier, Frank/Wewer, Göttrik (Hrsg.): Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 1-12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  450. Kreps, Sarah 2020: Social Media and International Relations, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  451. Kunstmann, Adi/ Stein, Rebecca L. 2015: Digital Militarism. Israel’s Occupation in the Social Media Age, Stanford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  452. Lechner, Frank J./Boli, John 2012: The Globalization Reader, 4. Auflage, Chichester. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  453. Manor, Ilan und Rhys Crilley 2018: Visually framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Twitter, in: Media, War & Conflict 11: 4, 369–391. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  454. Manor, Ilan/Crilley, Rhys 2020: The Mediatisation of MFAs: Diplomacy in the New Media Ecology, in: The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15, 66-92. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  455. Manor, Ilan/Segev, Elad 2020: Social Media Mobility: Leveraging Twitter Networks in Online Diplomacy, in: Global Policy 11: 2, 233-244. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  456. Manor, Ilan 2016: Are We There Yet: Have MFAs Realized the Potential of Digital Diplomacy? Results from a Cross-National Comparison, in: Diplomacy and Foreign Policy 1: 2, 1–110. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  457. Milan, Stefania 2015: Mobilizing in Times of Social Media, From Politics of Identity to a Politics of Visibility, in Dencik, Lina/Leistert, Oliver (Hrsg.), Critical Perspectives on Social Media and Protest, Between Control and Emancipation. London & New York, 53-70. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  458. Mutlu, Can E. 2015: Of Algorithms, Data and Ethics: A Response to Andrew Bennett, in: Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43: 3, 998-1002. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  459. Nahon, Karine 2016: Where There is Social Media There is Politics, in: Bruns, Axel/Enli, Gunn/Skogerbo, Eli/Larsson, Anders Olof/Christensen, Christian (Hrsg.), The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, London, 39-55. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  460. Olsson, Eva-Karin/Deverell, Edward/Wagnsson, Charlotte/Hellman, Maria 2016: EU armed forces and social media: convergence or divergence?, in: Defence Studies, 16: 2, 97-117. Rubenzer, Trevor 2017: Social Media and Foreign Policy, in: Thompson, William R. (Hrsg.), Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  461. The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  462. Schlag, Gabi/Heck, Axel (Hrsg.) 2020: Visualität und Weltpolitik, Praktiken des Zeigens und Sehens in den Internationalen Beziehungen, Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  463. Schlag, Gabi 2019: Thinking and Writing Visual Global Politics – a Review of R. Bleiker’s Visual Global Politics (2018, Abingdon and New York: Routledge), in: International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 32:1, 105–114. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  464. Schneiker, Andrea 2019: The New Defenders of Human Rights? How Radical Right-Wing TNGOs Are Using the Human Rights Discourse to Promote Their Ideas, in: Global Society 33: 2, 149-162. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  465. Schneiker, Andrea/Dau, Magnus/Joachim, Jutta/Martin, Marlen/Lange, Henriette 2019: How to Analyze Social Media? Assessing the Promise of Mixed-Methods Designs for Studying the Twitter Feeds of PMSCs., in: International Studies Perspectives 20: 2, 188–200. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  466. Shim, David/Stengel, Frank A. 2017: Social Media, Gender and the Mediatisation of War: Exploring the German Armed Forces’ Visual Representation of the Afghanistan Operation on Facebook, in: Global Discourse 7: 2-3, 330-347. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  467. Sold, Manjana (2020): The Amalgamation of Virtuality and Reality in Radicalisation Processes, in: https://blog.prif.org/2020/04/23/the-amalgamation-of-virtuality-and-reality-in-ra dicalisation-processes/. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  468. Sold, Manjana/Abay Gaspar, Hande/Junk, Julian 2020: Designing Research on Radicalisation using Social Media Content: Data Protection Regulations as Challenges and Opportunities, in: Günther, Christoph/Pfeifer, Simone (Hrsg.), Jihadi Audiovisuality and its Entanglements. Meanings, Aesthetics, Appropriations, Edinburgh, 51–73. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  469. Sudulich, Laura/Wall, Matthew/Gibson, Rachel/Cantijoch, Marta/Ward Stephen 2014: Introduction: The Importance of Method in the Study of the ‘Political Internet.’, in: Cantijoch, Marta/Gibsonn, Rachel/Ward, Stephen, Analyzing Social Media Data and Web Networks, London, 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  470. Statistisches Bundesamt 2020, Bevölkerungsstand, (Destatis-Website, Stand: 30.6.2020), in: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/Tabellen/zensus-geschlecht-staatsangehoerigkeit-2020.html; 31.12.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  471. Stengel, Frank A./Shim, David 2021: Militarizing Antimilitarism? Exploring the Gendered Representation of Military Service in German Recruitment Videos on Social Media, in: International Feminist Journal of Politics, online first, DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2021.1935289. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  472. Tufekci, Zeynep/Wilson, Christopher 2012: Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square, in: Journal of Communication 62: 2, 363-379. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  473. Viotti, Paul R./Kauppi, Mark V. 2012: International Relations Theory, 5. Auflage, Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  474. Weimann, Gabriel 2010: Terror on Facebook, Twitter and Youtube, in: The Brown Journal of World Affairs 16: 2, 45-54. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  475. Williams, Christine. B. 2017: Introduction: Social media, political marketing and the 2016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  476. U.S. election, in: Journal of Political Marketing 16: 3-4, 207-211. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  477. Zeitzoff, Thomas 2018: Does Social Media Influence Conflict? Evidence from the 2012 Gaza Conflict, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 62: 1, 29-63. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  478. Zeitzoff, Thomas/Kelly, John/Lotan, Gilad 2015: Using social media to measure foreign policy dynamics: An empirical analysis of the Iranian–Israeli confrontation (2012–13), in: Journal of Peace Research 52: 3, 368–383. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  479. Zuboff, Shoshana 2015: Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization, in: Journal of Information Technology 30, 75–89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-100
  480. Aro, Jessikka 2016: The Cyberspace War: Propaganda and Trolling as Warfare Tools, in: European View 15: 1, S. 121-132. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  481. Barlow, John Perry 1996: A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Davos, 8. Februar 1996. https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html (21.5.2021). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  482. Bjola, Corneliu 2015: Introduction: Making Sense of Digital Diplomacy, in: Bjola, Corneliu/ Holmes, Marcus (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, London, S. 1-9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  483. Bjola, Corneliu/Jiang, Lu 2015: Social Media and Public Diplomacy: A comparative analysis of the digital diplomatic strategies of the EU, US and Japan in China, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Holmes, Marcus (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, London, S. 71-88. Blancke, Stephan 2005: Information Warfare, in: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 30-31/2005, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  484. S. 24-32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  485. Cooper, Andrew F./Cornut, Jérémie 2018: The changing practices of frontline diplomacy: New directions for inquiry, in: Review of International Studies 45: 2, S. 300-319. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  486. Cull, Nicholas J. 2013: The Long Road to Public Diplomacy 2.0: The Internet in US Public Diplomacy, in: International Studies Review 15: 1, S. 123-139. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  487. Digital-Gipfel Fokusgruppe „Digitale Souveränität“ 2019: Digitale Souveränität im Kontext plattformbasierter Ökosysteme. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. https://www.de.digital/DIGITAL/Redaktion/DE/Digital-Gipfel/Download/2019/ digitale Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  488. -souveraenitaet.html (21.5.2021). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  489. Duncombe, Constance 2019: Digital Diplomacy: Emotion and Identity in the Public Realm, in: The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 14: 1-2, S. 102-116. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  490. Eriksson, Mats 2018: Lessons for Crisis Communication on Social Media: A Systematic Review of What Research Tells the Practice, in: International Journal of Strategic Communication 12: 5, S. 526-551. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  491. Golovchenko, Yevgeniy/Hartmann, Mareike/Adler-Nissen, Rebecca 2018: State, media and civil society in the information warfare over Ukraine: citizen curators of digital disinformation, in: International Affairs 94: 5, S. 975-994. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  492. Gray, Chris Hables/Gordo, Ángel J. 2014: Social Media in Conflict: Comparing Military and Social-Movement Technocultures, in: Cultural Politics 10: 3, S. 251-261. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  493. Hagen, Lutz M. /Wieland, Mareike/In der Au, Anne-Marie 2017: Algorithmischer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in: Medienjournal 41: 2, S. 127-143. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  494. Han, Su Yeon/Tsou, Ming-Hsiang/Clarke, Keith C. 2017: Revisiting the death of geography in the era of Big Data: the friction of distance in cyberspace and real space, in: International Journal of Digital Earth 11: 5, S. 451-469. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  495. Herrera, Geoffrey 2007: Cyberspace and Sovereignty: Thoughts on Physical Space and Digital Space, in: Dunn Cavelty, Myriam, et al. (Hrsg.): Power and Security in the Information Age: Investigating the Role of the State in Cyberspace, Aldershot, S. 67-93. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  496. Hofferberth, Matthias/Lambach, Daniel 2020: “It’s the End of the World As We Know It”: World Politics in a Postgovernance World, in: Global Governance 26: 4, S. 553-576. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  497. Hofmann, Jeanette/Kersting, Norbert/Ritzi, Claudia/Schünemann, Wolf J. (Hrsg.) 2019: Politik in der digitalen Gesellschaft, Bielefeld. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  498. Hoheisel-Gruler, Roland 2020: Der digitale Raum ist kein (grund-)rechtsfreier Raum, in: Rüdiger, Thomas-Gabriel/Bayerl, Petra Saskia (Hrsg.): Cyberkriminologie: Kriminologie für das digitale Zeitalter, Wiesbaden, S. 71-108. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  499. Holmes, Marcus 2015: Digital Diplomacy and International Change Management, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Holmes, Marcus (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, London, S. 13-32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  500. Inkster, Nigel 2016: Information Warfare and the US Presidential Election, in: Survival 58: 5, S. 23-32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  501. Kurowska, Xymena/Reshetnikov, Anatoly 2018: Neutrollization: Industrialized trolling as a pro-Kremlin strategy of desecuritization, in: Security Dialogue 49: 5, S. 345-363. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  502. Lambach, Daniel 2020a: The Territorialization of Cyberspace, in: International Studies Review 22: 3, S. 482-506. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  503. Lambach, Daniel 2020b: The Normative Order of the Territorial State, in: Kettemann, Matthias C. (Hrsg.): Navigating the Frontiers of Normative Orders: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Frankfurt, S. 44-58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  504. Lemke, Tobias/Habegger, Michael 2021: Diplomat or Troll? The Case Against Digital Diplomacy, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Zaiotti, Ruben (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy and International Relations: Autonomy, Legitimacy, and Contestation, London, S. 229-266. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  505. Libicki, Martin C. 2017: The Convergence of Information Warfare, in: Strategic Studies Quarterly 11: 1, S. 49-65. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  506. Mann, Daniel 2018: ‘I Am Spartacus’: individualising visual media and warfare, in: Media, Culture & Society 41: 1, S. 38-53. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  507. Manor, Ilan/Segev, Elad 2015: America's Selfie: How the US portrays itself on its social media accounts, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Holmes, Marcus (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, London, S. 89-108. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  508. Manor, Ilan 2016: Are We There Yet: Have MFAs Realized the Potential of Digital Diplomacy?: Results from a Cross-National Comparison, Leiden, Niederlande. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  509. Manor, Ilan/Pamment, James 2019: Towards prestige mobility? Diplomatic prestige and digital diplomacy, in: Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32: 2, S. 93-131. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  510. Medaglia, Rony/Zheng, Lei 2017: Mapping government social media research and moving it forward: A framework and a research agenda, in: Government Information Quarterly 34: 3, S. 496-510. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  511. Pohle, Julia/Thiel, Thorsten 2019: Digitale Vernetzung und Souveränität: Genealogie eines Spannungsverhältnisses, in: Borucki, Isabelle/Schünemann, Wolf J. (Hrsg.): Internet und Staat: Perspektiven auf eine komplizierte Beziehung, Baden-Baden, S. 57-80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  512. Prier, Jarred 2017: Commanding the Trend: Social Media as Information Warfare, in: Strategic Studies Quarterly 11: 4, S. 50-85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  513. Rid, Thomas 2020: Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  514. Rosecrance, Richard N. 1999: The rise of the virtual state: Wealth and power in the coming century, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  515. Thiel, Thorsten 2019: Souveränität: Dynamisierung und Kontestation in der digitalen Konstellation, in: Hofmann, Jeanette, et al. (Hrsg.): Politik in der digitalen Gesellschaft, Bielefeld, S. 47-60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  516. Zaharna, R. S./Uysal, Nur 2016: Going for the jugular in public diplomacy: How adversarial publics using social media are challenging state legitimacy, in: Public Relations Review 42: 1, S. 109-119. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-109
  517. Abbott, Kenneth W./Genschel, Philipp/Snidal, Duncan/Zangl, Bernhard 2015: International Organizations as Orchestrators, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  518. Adler, Emanuel/Drieschova, Alena 2021: The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order, in: International Organization 75: 2, 359-386. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  519. Alleyne, Mark D. 2003: Global Lies? Propaganda, the UN, and World Order, Houndmills. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  520. Althaus, Scott L./Edy, Jill A./Entman, Robert M./Phalen, Patricia 1996: Revising the Indexing Hypothesis. Officials, Media, and the Libya Crisis, in: Political Communication 13: 407-421. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  521. Altheide, David 1994: An Ecology of Communication: Toward a Mapping of the Effective Environment, in: The Sociological Quarterly 35: 665-683. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  522. Barberá, Pablo/Zeitzoff, Thomas 2017: The new public address system: why do world leaders adopt social media?, in: International Studies Quarterly 62: 1, 121-130. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  523. Bennett, W. Lance/Segerberg, Alexandra 2012: The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics, in: Information, Communication & Society 15: 5, 739-768. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  524. Berry, Jeffrey M./Sobieraj, Sarah 2013: The outrage industry: Political opinion media and the new incivility, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  525. Bjola, Corneliu/Pamment, James 2016: Digital containment: Revisiting containment strategy in the digital age, in: Global Affairs 2: 2, 131-142. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  526. Bjola, Corneliu/Zaiotti, Ruben 2020: Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations: Autonomy, Legitimacy and Contestation, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  527. Bouchard, Caroline 2020: The United Nations in the Digital Age, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Zaiotti, Ruben (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations: Autonomy, Legitimacy and Contestation, London, 101. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  528. Brüggemann, Michael 2008: Europäische Öffentlichkeit durch Öffentlichkeitsarbeit? Die Informationspolitik der Europäischen Kommission, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  529. Bruns, Axel 2008: Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  530. Bruns, Axel 2019: Are Filter Bubbles Real?, Cambridge UK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  531. Bucher, Taina/Helmond, Anne 2017: The affordances of social media platforms, in: Burgess, Jean/Marwick, Alice/Poell, Thomas (Hrsg.): The SAGE handbook of social media, London, 233-253. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  532. Bulovsky, Andrew 2019: Authoritarian communication on social media: The relationship between democracy and leaders’ digital communicative practices, in: International Communication Gazette 81: 1, 20-45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  533. Burt, R. S. 2005: Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital), Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  534. Coldevin, Gary 2001: Participatory Communication and Adult Learning for Rural Development, in: Journal of International Communication 7: 2, 51-69. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  535. Corrie, Karen L. 2015: The International Criminal Court: using technology in network diplomacy, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Holmes, Marcus (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy, New York, 159-177. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  536. Dimitrov, Roumen 2014: Bringing Communication up to Agency: UNESCO Reforms Its Visibility, in: Public Relations Inquiry 3: 3, 293-318. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  537. Dingwerth, Klaus/Witt, Antonia/Lehmann, Ina/Reichel, Ellen/Weise, Tobias 2019: International Organizations under Pressure: Legitimating Global Governance in Changing Times, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  538. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2012: „But the UN Said So...“: International Organizations as Discursive Authorities, in: Global Society 26: 4, 1-23. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  539. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2018: International Organizations “Going Public”? An Event History Analysis of Public Communication Reforms 1950–2015, in: International Studies Quarterly 62: 4, 723-736. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  540. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2020a: IO public communication and discursive inclusion: how the UN reported the Arms Trade Treaty process to a global audience, in: Journal of International Relations and Development 23: 2, 385-413. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  541. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2020b: IO public communication going digital? Understanding social media adoption and use in times of politicization, in: Zaiotti, Ruben/Bjola, Corneliu (Hrsg.): The Digital Diplomacy of International Organizations: Autonomy, Legitimacy and Contestation in the Global Digital Age, London, 21-50. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  542. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2020c: Wie und warum kommunizieren internationale Organisationen? Zum problematischen Verhältnis von Politisierung und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 27: 1, 37-68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  543. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias forthcoming: Building Bridges or Digging the Trench? UN Communication of the Global Compact for Migration on Twitter. KHK/GCR Working Paper Series, Duisburg. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  544. Ellison, Nicole B./Boyd, Danah M. 2013: Sociality through social network sites, in: Dutton/ William H. (Hrsg.): The Oxford handbook of internet studies, Oxford UK, 512-80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  545. Flaxman, Seth/Goel, Sharad/Rao, Justin M. 2016: Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption, in: Public opinion quarterly 80: S1, 298-320. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  546. Garrett, R. Kelly 2009: Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users, in: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14: 2, 265-285. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  547. Goheer, Nabeel 2020: Clock, Cloud, and Contestation: The digital journey of the Commonwealth Secretariat, in: Zaiotti, Ruben/Bjola, Corneliu (Hrsg.): The Digital Diplomacy of International Organizations: Autonomy, Legitimacy and Contestation in the Global Digital Age, London, 127-152. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  548. Goritz, Alexandra/Schuster, Johannes/Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina 2020: International Public Administrations on Twitter: A Comparison of Digital Authority in Global Climate Policy, in: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice: 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  549. Grigorescu, Alexandru 2007: Transparency of Intergovernmental Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies and Nongovernmental Organizations, in: International Studies Quarterly 51: 3, 625-648. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  550. Gronau, Jennifer/Schmidtke, Henning 2016: The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics–International Institutions’ Legitimation Strategies, in: Review of International Studies 42: 03, 535-557. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  551. Hall, Nina 2019: When do refugees matter? The importance of issue salience for digital advocacy organizations, in: Interest Groups & Advocacy 8: 3, 333-355. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  552. Hannak, Aniko/Sapiezynski, Piotr/Molavi Kakhki, Arash/Krishnamurthy, Balachander/Lazer, David/Mislove, Alan/Wilson, Christo 2013: Measuring personalization of web search, in: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, 527-538. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  553. Hermida, Alfred 2010: Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism, in: Journalism practice 4: 3, 297-308. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  554. Ikenberry, G. John 2010: The Liberal International Order and its Discontents, in: Millennium 38: 3, 509-521. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  555. Iyengar, Shanto/Hahn, Kyu S. 2009: Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use, in: Journal of communication 59: 1, 19-39. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  556. Jaidka, Kokil/Zhou, Alvin/Lelkes, Yphtach 2019: Brevity is the Soul of Twitter: The Constraint Affordance and Political Discussion, in: Journal of Communication 69: 4, 345-372. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  557. Jakob, Julia 2020: Supporting digital discourse? The deliberative function of links on Twitter, in: New Media & Society, OnlineFirst, DOI: 1461444820972388. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  558. Kaplan, Andreas M./Haenlein, Michael 2010: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media, in: Business horizons 53: 1, 59-68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  559. Klinger, Ulrike/Svensson, Jakob 2015: The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach, in: New media & society 17: 8, 1241-1257. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  560. Kooti, Farshad/Yang, Haeryun/Cha, Meeyoung/Gummadi, P. Krishna/Mason, Winter A. 2012: The Emergence of Conventions in Online Social Networks., in: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 6: 1, 194-201. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  561. Kriesi, Hanspeter/Grande, Edgar/Lachat, Romain/Dolezal, Martin/Bornschier, Simon/Frey, Timotheos (Hrsg.) 2008: West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  562. Krzyżanowski, Michał 2018: Social media in/and the politics of the European Union: Politico- organizational communication, institutional cultures and self-inflicted elitism, in: Journal of Language and Politics 17: 2, 281-304. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  563. Lallana, Emmanuel C. 2012: ASEAN 2.0: ICT, Governance and Community in Southeast Asia. Singapore. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  564. Lewandowsky, Stephan/Ecker, Ullrich KH/Cook, John 2017: Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era, in: Journal of applied research in memory and cognition 6: 4, 353-369. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  565. Lipson, Michael 2007: Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy?, in: European Journal of International Relations 13: 1, 5-34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  566. Loader, Brian D./Mercea, Dan 2011: Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics, in: Information, Communication & Society 14: 6, 757-769. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  567. Loh, Kep Kee/Kanai, Ryota 2016: How Has the Internet Reshaped Human Cognition?, in: The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry 22: 5, 506-520. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  568. Mandel, Bethany 2012: The UN’s Freudian Tweet, in: The Commentary, 29.11.2012. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  569. Maronkova, B. 2016: NATO’s Embrace of Digital Outreach, in: CPD Blog, https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/natos-embrace-digital-outreach (letzter Zugriff: 27.95.2021). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  570. Meraz, Sharon/Papacharissi, Zizi 2013: Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on# Egypt, in: The international journal of press/politics 18: 2, 138-166. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  571. Meyer, Christoph O. 2009: Does European Union Politics Become Mediatized? the Case of the European Commission, in: Journal of European Public Policy 16: 7, 1047-1064. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  572. Milan, Stefania 2015: From social movements to cloud protesting: the evolution of collective identity, in: Information, Communication & Society 18: 8, 887-900. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  573. Munson, Sean A./Resnick, Paul 2010: Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1457-1466. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  574. Norris, Pippa/Inglehart, Ronald 2019: Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  575. Olsson, Eva-Karin/Wagnsson, Charlotte/Hammargård, Kajsa 2018: The use of political communication by international organizations: The case of EU and NATO, in: Countering Online Propaganda and Extremism, 66-80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  576. Papacharissi, Zizi 2016: Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality, in: Information, Communication & Society 19: 3, 307-324. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  577. Pariser, Eli 2011: The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  578. Risso, Linda 2014: Propaganda and Intelligence in the Cold War: The NATO Information Service (Studies in intelligence), Milton Park. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  579. Servaes, Jan 2007: Harnessing the UN System Into a Common Approach On Communication for Development, in: International Communication Gazette 69: 6, 483-507. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  580. Steffek, Jens/Kissling, Claudia/Nanz, Patrizia (Hrsg.) 2008: Civil Society Partizipation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit?, Houndmills. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  581. Strijbis, Oliver/Helmer, Joschua/De Wilde, Pieter 2018: A cosmopolitan–communitarian cleavage around the world? Evidence from ideological polarization and party–voter linkages, in: Acta Politica: 1-24. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  582. Sunstein, Cass 2007: Republic.com 2.0., Princeton NJ. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  583. Tufekci, Zeynep 2017: Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest, New Haven CT. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  584. Williams, Hywel TP/McMurray, James R./Kurz, Tim/Lambert, F. Hugo 2015: Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change, in: Global environmental change 32: 126-138. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  585. Zürn, Michael/Binder, Martin/Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2012: International Authority and Its Politicization, in: International Theory 4: 1, 69-106. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-120
  586. Arbia, Ali 2014: Die Republik der Gelehrten 2.0, in: ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21: 1, 109-127. Arbia Ali Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  587. Aykut, Stefan C./Morena, Edouard/Foyer, Jean 2020: ‘Incantatory’ Governance: Global Climate Politics’ Performative Turn and its Wider Significance for Global Politics, in: International Politics. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  588. Bauer, Michael W./Knill, Christoph/Eckhard, Steffen (Hrsg.) 2017: International Bureaucracy. Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research (Public Sector Organizations), London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  589. Bjola, Corneliu/Holmes, Marcus (Hrsg.) 2015: Digital Diplomacy. Theory and Practice (Routledge New Diplomacy Studies), Hoboken. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  590. Bossetta, Michael 2018: The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election, in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95: 2, 471-496. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  591. Bossner, Felix/Nagel, Melanie 2020: Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations, in: Politics and Governance 8: 2, 311-325. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  592. Brand, Alexander 2012: Medien-Diskurs-Weltpolitik: Wie Massenmedien die internationale Politik beeinflussen, Bielefeld. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  593. Briggs, Paul 2020: Global Twitter Users 2020. Pandemic Boosts Previously Expected Slow Growth, in: https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-twitter-users-2020; 15.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  594. Burson Cohn/Wolfe 2018: Twiplomacy Study 2018, in: https://twiplomacy.com/blog/ twiplomacy-study-2018/; 4.8.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  595. Chen, Wenhong/Tu, Fangjing/Zheng, Pei 2017: A Transnational Networked Public Sphere of Air Pollution: Analysis of a Twitter Network of PM2.5 from the Risk Society Perspective, in: Information, Communication & Society 20: 7, 1005-1023. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  596. Climate Action Network 2021: Fossil of the Day, in: https://climatenetwork.org/resource_ type Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  597. /fossil-of-the-day/; 4.8.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  598. Dimitrov, Radoslav S. 2016: The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors, in: Global Environmental Politics 16: 3, 1-11. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  599. Duncombe, Constance 2017: Twitter and Transformative Diplomacy: Social Media and Iran– US Relations, in: International Affairs 93: 3, 545-562. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  600. Duncombe, Constance 2018: Twitter and the Challenges of Digital Diplomacy, in: SAIS Review of International Affairs 38: 2, 91-100. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  601. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2018: Self-Legitimation in the Face of Politicization: Why International Organizations Centralized Public Communication, in: The Review of International Organizations 13: 4, 519-546. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  602. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2020: IO Public Communication Going Digital? Understanding Social Media Adoption and Use in Times of Politicization, in: Bjola, Corneliu/Zaiotti, Ruben (Hrsg.): Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations, Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY, 21-51. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  603. Eckhard, Steffen/Ege, Jörn 2016: International Bureaucracies and their Influence on Policy- Making: A Review of Empirical Evidence, in: Journal of European Public Policy 23: 7, 960-978. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  604. Enberg, Jasmine 2020: Global Instagram Users 2020. The Pandemic Propels Worldwide User Base to 1.00 Billion for the First Time, in: https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-in stagram-users-2020; 15.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  605. Etter, Michael 2014: Broadcasting, reacting, engaging – three strategies for CSR communication in Twitter, in: Journal of Communication Management 18: 4, 322-342. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  606. Goritz, Alexandra/Kolleck, Nina/Jörgens, Helge 2019: Analyzing Twitter Data: Advantages and Challenges in the Study of UN Climate Negotiations, in: SAGE Research Methods Cases, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526472441. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  607. Goritz, Alexandra/Schuster, Johannes/Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina 2020: International Public Administrations on Twitter: A Comparison of Digital Authority in Global Climate Policy, in: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  608. Guo, Chao/Saxton, Gregory D. 2014: Tweeting Social Change. How Social Media are Changing Nonprofit Advocacy, in: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43: 1, 57-79. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  609. Hall, Nina/Schmitz, Hans P./Dedmon, Michael 2019: Transnational Advocacy and NGOs in the Digital Era: New Forms of Networked Power, in: International Studies Quarterly 64: 1, 159-167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  610. Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina/Saerbeck, Barbara 2016: Exploring the Hidden Influence of International Treaty Secretariats. Using Social Network Analysis to Analyse the Twitter Debate on the ‘Lima Work Programme on Gender’, in: Journal of European Public Policy 23: 7, 979-998. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  611. Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina/Saerbeck, Barbara/Well, Mareike 2017: Orchestrating (Bio-)Diversity. The Secretariat of the Convention of Biological Diversity as an Attention-Seeking Bureaucracy, in: Bauer, Michael W./Knill, Christoph/Eckhard, Steffen (Hrsg.): International Bureaucracy. Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research, London, 73-95. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  612. Jungherr, Andreas 2016: Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review, in: Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13: 1, 72-91. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  613. Knill, Christoph/Bauer, Michael W. 2016: Policy-Making by International Public Administrations: Concepts, Causes and Consequences, in: Journal of European Public Policy 23: 7, 949-959. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  614. Kolleck, Nina/Well, Mareike/Sperzel, Severin/Jörgens, Helge 2017: The Power of Social Networks. How the UNFCCC Secretariat Creates Momentum for Climate Education, in: Global Environmental Politics 94: 1, 106-126. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  615. Pond, Philip/Lewis, Jeff 2019: Riots and Twitter: Connective Politics, Social Media and Framing Discourses in the Digital Public Sphere, in: Information, Communication & Society 22: 2, 213-231. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  616. Schneiker, Andrea/Dau, Magnus/Joachim, Jutta/Martin, Marlen/Lange, Henriette 2019: How to Analyze Social Media? Assessing the Promise of Mixed-Methods Designs for Studying the Twitter Feeds of PMSCs, in: International Studies Perspectives 20: 2, 188-200. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  617. Schuster, Johannes/Jörgens, Helge/Kolleck, Nina 2019: The Rise of Global Policy Networks in Education: Analyzing Twitter Debates on Inclusive Education Using Social Network Analysis, in: Journal of Education Policy 36: 2, 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  618. Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C. 2018: Twitter as Data (Elements in Quantitative and Computational Methods for the Social Sciences), Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  619. Tumasjan, Andranik/Sprenger, Timm O./Sandner, Philipp G./Welpe, Isabell M. 2011: Election Forecasts with Twitter: How 140 Characters Reflect the Political Landscape, in: Social Science Computer Review 29: 4, 402-418. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  620. Twitter 2014: The 2014 #YearOnTwitter, in: https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/a/2014/the- 2014-yearontwitter.html; 25.7.2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  621. Vu, Hong T./Do, Hung V./Seo, Hyunjin/Liu, Yuchen 2020: Who Leads the Conversation on Climate Change?: A Study of a Global Network of NGOs on Twitter, in: Environmental Communication 14: 4, 450-464. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  622. Wasserman, Stanley/Faust, Katherine 2009: Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, Band 8), Cambridge u.a. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  623. Williamson, Debra A. 2020: Global Facebook Users 2020. The Pandemic Brought Back Momentum in Lagging Regions and Led to Even Higher Growth in Others, in: https://www. emarketer.com/content/global-facebook-users-2020; 15.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-139
  624. Ahmad, Muhammad Auwal/Ersoy, Metin/Dambo, Tamar Haruna 2020: Influence of Political Tweets on Campaign Coverage: Building the News Agenda in Twittersphere, in: Journalism Practice, online first, doi: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1805793. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  625. Aslett, Kevin/Webb Williams, Nora/Casas, Andreu/Zuidema, Wesley/Wilkerson, John 2020: What Was the Problem in Parkland? Using Social Media to Measure the Effectiveness of Issue Frames, in: Policy Studies Journal, online first, doi: 10.1111/psj.12410. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  626. Basham, Victoria M. 2013: War, Identity and the Liberal State: Everyday Experiences of the Geopolitical in the Armed Forces, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  627. Basham, Victoria M./Belkin, Aaron/Gifkins, Jess 2015: What is Critical Military Studies?, in: Critical Military Studies 1: 1, 1-2. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  628. Belkin, Aaron 2012: Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898-2001, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  629. BMVg 2011: Pressemitteilung: Ein Jahr YouTube- und flickr-Auftritte der Bundeswehr, verfügbar unter: http://www.bmvg.de/resource/resource/MzEzNTM4MmUzMzMyMmUzMTM1MzMyZTM2MzIzMDMwMzAzMDMwMzAzMDY3NzE3NTc5MzE3MjZiMzYyMDIwMjAyMDIw/PM38%20%E2%80%90%201%20Jahr%20Youtube%20fli ckr%20Bw.pdf; 9.8.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  630. BMVg 2019: Social Media-Guidelines, Berlin: BMVg, Presse- und Informationsstab, verfügbar unter: https://www.bundeswehr.de/resource/blob/153030/7713bef2cf60a5198b74abfe0b8b0444/20191122-download-social-media-guidelines-data.pdf; 9.8.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  631. Brown, Melissa T. 2012: Enlisting Masculinity: The Construction of Gender in US Military Recruiting Advertising during the All-Volunteer Force, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  632. Brummer, Klaus/Kießling, Friedrich (Hrsg.) 2019: Zivilmacht Bundesrepublik? Bundesdeutsche außenpolitische Rollen vor und nach 1989 aus politik- und geschichtswissenschaftlichen Perspektiven, Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  633. Bundeswehr 2020: Die Bundeswehr auf Social Media, verfügbar unter: https://www.bundeswehr.de/de/social-media-bundeswehr/bundeswehr-auf-social-media; 9.8.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  634. Butler, Judith 1993: Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  635. Carruthers, Susan L. 2011: The Media at War, Basingstoke. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  636. Cockburn, Cynthia 2010: Militarism and War, in: Shepherd, Laura J. (Hrsg.): Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations, London, 105-115. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  637. Crilley, Rhys/Manor, Ilan/Bjola, Corneliu 2020: Visual narratives of global politics in the digital age: an introduction, in: Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33: 5, 628-637. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  638. Crilley, Rhys 2016: Like and Share Forces: Making Sense of Military Social Media Sites, in: Shepherd, Laura J./Hamilton, Caitlin (Hrsg.): Understanding Popular Culture and World Politics in the Digital Age, London, 51-67. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  639. Czerwick, Edwin 2009: Das Verhältnis von öffentlicher Verwaltung und öffentlicher Meinung im demokratischen politischen System Deutschlands, in: Czerwick, Edwin/Lorig, Wolfgang H./Treutner, Erhard (Hrsg.): Die öffentliche Verwaltung in der Demokratie der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Wiesbaden, 135-155. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  640. Der Derian, James 2009: Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment-Network, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  641. Deutscher Bundestag 2018: Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage des Abgeordneten Dr. Anton Friesen und der Fraktion der AfD – Drucksache 19/4140 – Finanzierung von Social Media Accounts, BT-Drs. 19/4796. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  642. Doty, Roxanne Lynn 1993: Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines, in: International Studies Quarterly 37: 3, 297-320. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  643. Enloe, Cynthia 2016: Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link, 2. Auflage, Lanham, MD. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  644. Foucault, Michel 2002: The Archaeology of Knowledge, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  645. Geis, Anna 2021: The Ambivalence of (Not) Being in a “War”: The “Civilian Power” Germany and the “Stabilization Operation” in Afghanistan, in: Ish-Shalom, P. (Hrsg.): Concepts at Work: On the Linguistic Infrastructure of World Politics, Ann Arbor, MI, 65-91. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  646. Geis, Anna/Nullmeier, Frank/Daase, Christopher (Hrsg.) 2012: Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen, Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  647. Geise, Stephanie/Heck, Axel/Panke, Diana 2021: The Effects of Digital Media Images on Political Participation Online: Results of an Eye-Tracking Experiment Integrating Individual Perceptions of “Photo News Factors”, in: Policy & Internet 13: 1, 54-85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  648. Geise, Stephanie/Panke, Diana/Heck, Axel 2020: Still Images—Moving People? How Media Images of Protest Issues and Movements Influence Participatory Intentions, in: The International Journal of Press/Politics 26: 1, 92-118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  649. Horkheimer, Max 1937: Traditionelle und kritische Theorie, in: Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6: 2, 245-294. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  650. Hoskins, Andrew/O'Loughlin, Ben 2015: Arrested War: The Third Phase of Mediatization, in: Information, Communication & Society 18: 11, 1320-1338. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  651. Jacobs, Jörg 2016: Nutzung digitaler Medien und die Bundeswehr, in: Jacobs, Jörg/Zowislo- Grünewald, Natascha/Beitzinger, Franz (Hrsg.): Social Media in der Lebenswelt und bei der Berufswahl Jugendlicher – Who cares?, Baden-Baden, 77-94. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  652. Jacobs, Jörg 2019: Medien und Bundeswehr, in: Möllers, Heiner/Jacobs, Jörg (Hrsg.): Bundeswehr und Medien: Ereignisse – Handlungsmuster – Mechanismen in jüngster Geschichte und heute, Baden-Baden, 11-28. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  653. Jester, Natalie 2019: Army recruitment video advertisements in the US and UK since 2002: Challenging ideals of hegemonic military masculinity?, in: Media, War & Conflict 14: 1, 57-74. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  654. Joachim, Jutta/Schneiker, Andrea 2020: (Dis-)Empowered Military Masculinities? Recruitment of Veterans by PMSCs Through YouTube, in: Moehlecke de Baseggio, Eva/ Schneider, Olivia/Szvircsev Tresch, Tibor (Hrsg.): Social Media and the Armed Forces, Cham, 95-109. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  655. Kaempf, Sebastian 2013: The Mediatisation of War in a Transforming Global Media Landscape, in: Australian Journal of International Affairs 67: 5, 586-604. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  656. König, Mathias/König, Wolfgang 2019: Soziale Medien (Social Media), in: Klenk, Tanja/Nullmeier, Frank/Wewer, Göttrik (Hrsg.): Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung, Wiesbaden, 1-12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  657. Krauss, Ellis S./Maull, Hanns W. 2020: Germany, Japan and the Fate of International Order, in: Survival 62: 3, 159-178. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  658. Lücking, Daniel 2018: Parlamentsarmee im Guerillakrieg, in: Der Freitag, 3. Mai 2018, verfügbar unter: https://www.freitag.de/autoren/daniel-luecking/rollen-rechte-bundeswehr; 16.02. 2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  659. Maltby, Sarah 2012: The Mediatization of the Military, in: Media, War & Conflict 5: 3, 255-268. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  660. Mirzoeff, Nicholas 2012: Watching Babylon: The war in Iraq and global visual culture, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  661. Moers, Walter 1998: Adolf. Äch bin wieder da!!, Frankfurt a.M.. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  662. Münch, Philipp 2015: Die Bundeswehr in Afghanistan. Militärische Handlungslogik in internationalen Interventionen, Freiburg. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  663. Newman, Nic/Fletcher, Richard/Schulz, Anne/Simge, Andı/Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis 2020: Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Oxford University. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  664. Nonhoff, Martin 2011: Konstruktivistisch-pragmatische Methodik. Ein Plädoyer für die Diskursanalyse, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 18: 2, 91-107. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  665. Nonhoff, Martin 2017: Discourse Analysis as Critique, in: Palgrave Communications 3, Artikel 17074, 1-11, doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.74. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  666. Peterson, V. Spike 2010: Gendered Identities, Ideologies, and Practices in the Context of War and Militarism, in: Sjoberg, Laura/Via, Sandra (Hrsg.): Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives, Santa Barbara, CA, 17-29. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  667. Pettersson, Mikael 2011: Depictive Traces: On the Phenomenology of Photography, in: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69: 2, 185-196. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  668. Quest, Hendrik/Messerschmidt, Maike 2017: Männlichkeiten im Konflikt. Zum theoretischen Verhältnis von militarisierter Männlichkeit, militärischer Männlichkeit und Hypermaskulinität, in: Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 6: 2, 259-290. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  669. Reinsch, Melanie 2018: Die Truppe muss draußen bleiben, in: Frankfurter Rundschau, 3. Mai 2018, verfügbar unter: https://www.fr.de/kultur/truppe-muss-draussen-bleiben-1097437 5.html; 16.2.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  670. Schlag, Gabi/Heck, Axel (Hrsg.) 2020: Visualität und Weltpolitik: Praktiken des Zeigens und Sehens in den Internationalen Beziehungen, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  671. Seppo, Antti 2020: From Guilt to Responsibility and Beyond: The Evolution of German Strategic Culture after the End of the Cold War, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  672. Shepherd, Laura J. 2017: ‘Social Media, Gender, and the Mediatisation of War’: A Reply to Shim and Stengel, in: Global Discourse 7: 2-3, 348-352. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  673. Shim, David/Stengel, Frank A. 2017: Social Media, Gender and the Mediatisation of War: Exploring the German Armed Forces’ Visual Representation of the Afghanistan Operation on Facebook, in: Global Discourse 7: 2-3, 330-347. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  674. Stahl, Roger 2010: Militainment, Inc.: War, Media, and Popular Culture, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  675. Stengel, Frank A. 2020: The Politics of Military Force: Antimilitarism, Ideational Change and Post-Cold War German Security Discourse, Ann Arbor, MI. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  676. Stengel, Frank A./Shim, David 2021: Militarizing Antimilitarism? Exploring the Gendered Representation of Military Service in German Recruitment Videos on Social Media, in: International Feminist Journal of Politics, online first, doi: 10.1080/14616742.2021.1935289. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  677. Trevisan, Filippo/Hoskins, Andrew/Oates, Sarah/Mahlouly, Dounia 2018: The Google Voter: Search Engines and Elections in the New Media Ecology, in: Information, Communication & Society 21: 1, 111-128. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  678. Weldes, Jutta/Saco, Diana 1996: Making State Action Possible: The United States and the Discursive Construction of The Cuban Problem, 1960-1994, in: Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25: 2, 361-395. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  679. Wheatley, D. 2020: A Typology of News Sourcing: Routine and Non-Routine Channels of Production, in: Journalism Practice 14: 3, 277-298. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  680. Wibben, Annick T. R. 2018: Why we need to study (US) militarism: A critical feminist lens, in: Security Dialogue 49: 1-2, 136-148. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  681. Young, Iris Marion 2003: The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State, in: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society 29: 1, 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-152
  682. Abay Gaspar, Hande 2020: Salafist Groups’ use of Social Media and its Implications for Prevention. in: https://gnet-research.org/2020/04/28/salafist-groups-use-of-social-media- and-its-implications-for-prevention/; 20.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  683. Abay Gaspar, Hande/Junk, Julian/Sold, Manjana 2018: Zum Verhältnis von Online- und Offline-Radikalisierung: Beobachtungen aus der Forschung zu salafistischem Dschihadismus. Zeitschrift „Demokratie gegen Menschenfeindlichkeit”, Heft 2/2018, 26-38. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  684. Andreotta, Matthew/Nugroho, Robertus/Hurlstone, Mark J./Boschetti, Fabio/Farrell, Simon/ Walker, Iain/Paris, Cecile 2019: Analyzing Social Media Data: A Mixed-Methods Framework Combining Computational and Qualitative Text Analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51: 3, 1766-1781. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  685. Atwan, Abdel Bari 2015: Islamic State: The Digital Caliphate, Oakland, CA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  686. Awan, Imran 2017: Cyber-Extremism: Isis and the Power of Social Media. Social Science and Public Policy, 54: 2, 138-149. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  687. Baaken, Till/Schlegel, Linda 2017: Fishermen or Swarm Dynamics? Should We Understand Jihadist Online-Radicalization As a Top-Down or Bottom-Up Process? Journal for Deradicalization, 13, 178-212. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  688. Baugut, Philip/Neumann, Katharina 2018: Das Medienbild in der islamistischen Online-Propaganda. Eine Analyse der Facebook-Posts von Pierre Vogel. Publizistik, 63: 2, 73-95. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  689. Caiani, Manuela/Kröll, Patricia 2015: The Transnationalization of the Extreme Right and the Use of the Internet. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 39: 4, 331-351. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  690. Celso, Anthony 2018: The Islamic State: A Comparative History of Jihadist Warfare, Lanham, MD. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  691. CEP 2020: Gewaltorientierter Rechtsextremismus und Terrorismus – Transnationale Konnektivität, Definitionen, Vorfälle, Strukturen und Gegenmaßnahmen, in: Project, Counter Extremism (Hrsg.). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  692. Criezis, Meili 2020a: Islamic State Telegram Stickers: Purposes, Themes, and Narratives. in: https://gnet-research.org/2020/06/30/islamic-state-telegram-stickers-purposes-themes-an d-narratives/; 30.6.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  693. Criezis, Meili 2020b: Online Deceptions: Renegotiating Gender Boundaries on ISIS Telegram. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  694. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14: 1, 67-73. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  695. Cruickshank, Paul/Rassler, Don 2020: A View from the CT Foxhole: A Virtual Roundtable on COVID-19 and Counterterrorism with Audrey Kurth Cronin, Lieutenant General (Ret) Michael Nagata, Magnus Ranstorp, Ali Soufan, and Juan Zarate. CTCSENTINEL, Special Issue COVID-19 & Counterterrorism, 13: 6, 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  696. Daymon, Chelsea/Criezis, Meili 2020: Pandemic Narratives: Pro-Islamic State Media and the Coronavirus. CTCSENTINEL, Special Issue COVID-19 & Counterterrorism, 13: 6, 26-32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  697. Droogan, Julian/Waldek, Lise/Blackhall, Ryan 2018: Innovation and Terror: An Analysis of the Use of Social Media by Terror-related Groups in the Asia Pacific. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 13: 2, 170-184. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  698. Felden, Esther/Höhn, Anne/Sanders, Lewis/Wildon, Jordan 2021: QAnon ohne Donald Trump Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  699. – eine deutsche Nahaufnahme. DW, 19.1.2021, in: https://www.dw.com/de/qanon-ohne- donald-trump-eine-deutsche-nahaufnahme/a-56273727; 21.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  700. Fernandez, Alberto M. 2015: Why ISIS Flourishes in its Media Domain, in: The American Foreign Policy Council Defense Technology Program Brief, 12, 6-9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  701. Fielitz, Maik/Schwarz, Karolin 2020: HATE NOT FOUND?! Das Deplatforming der Extremen Rechten und seine Folgen. Berlin: Institut für Demokratie und Zivilgesellschaft (IDZ). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  702. Fischer, Jana/Dobrick, Farina M./Hagen, Lutz M. 2018: Introduction, in: Dobrick, Farina Madita/Fischer, Jana/Hagen, Lutz M. (Hrsg.) Research Ethics in the Digital Age: Ethics for the Social Sciences and Humanities in Times of Mediatization and Digitization. Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  703. Goertz, Stefan/Goertz-Neumann, Martina 2018: Politisch motivierte Kriminalität und Radikalisierung, Heidelberg. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  704. Golla, Sebastian J./Hofmann, Henning/Bäcker, Matthias 2018: Connecting the Dots: Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung in Sozialen Online-Medien im Lichte von DS-GVO und BDSG-neu. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit – DuD, 42: 2, 89-100. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  705. Golla, Sebastian J./Schönfeld, Max von 2019: Kratzen und Schürfen im Datenmilieu – Web Scraping in sozialen Netzwerken zu wissenschaftlichen Forschungszwecken. Kommunikation und Recht, 15-22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  706. Hass Im Netz o. J.: Report: Islamistische Inhalte auf Telegram. in: https://www.hass-im-netz.i nfo/themen/artikel/report-islmistische-inhalte-auf-telegram.html; 21.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  707. Holtmann, Philipp 2010: Die Nutzung des Internet durch islamistische Terroristen, in: ISPK (Hrsg.) Jahrbuch Terrorismus 2010, Band 4, 55-80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  708. Hossain, Md Sazzad 2018: Social Media and Terrorism: Threats and Challenges to the Modern Era. South Asian Survey, 22: 2, 136-155. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  709. Interpol o. J.: Analysing Social Media. in: https://www.interpol.int/Crimes/Terrorism/ Analysi ng-social-media; 14.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  710. Ipsen, Femming/Bollhöfner, Julian/Seitz, Christina/Wörner-Schappert, Michael 2019: Rechtsextremismus im Netz. Bericht 2018/2019, in: Jugendschutz.net (Hrsg.). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  711. Jain, Pooja N /Vaidya, Archana S 2021: Analysis of Social Media Based on Terrorism | A Review. Vietnam Journal of Computer Science, 8: 1, 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  712. Jugendschutz.net 2020: Hate Speech – Ein europäischer Vergleich, in https://www.jugendschutz.net/fileadmin/download/pdf/Report_Hate_Speech_Europaeischer_Vergleich.pdf; 20.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  713. Kaplan, Andreas M./Haenlein, Michael 2010: Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53: 1, 59-68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  714. Kreps, Sarah 2020: Social Media and International Relations, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  715. Mansour-Ille, Dina 2019: Social Media and the Dynamics of Radicalization and Violent Extremism among Female Migrant Workers. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 19: 3, 248-268. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  716. Matusitz, Jonathan 2021: Communication in Global Jihad, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  717. Müller, Karsten/Schwarz, Carlo 2020: Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate Crime. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1-37. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  718. Nbc 2021: Islamic State claims responsibility for attack that killed 11 in Pakistan, in: https://w ww.nbcnews.com/news/world/islamic-state-claims-responsibility-attack-pakistan-11-kill ed-n1252691; 5.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  719. Patrikarakos, David 2017: War in 140 Characters. How Social Media is Reshaping Conflict in the Twenty-First Century, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  720. Rat Für Sozial- und Wirtschafsdaten 2017: Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften, in: https://www.konsortswd.de/wp-conten t/uploads/RatSWD_Output9_Forschungsethik.pdf; 15.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  721. Reinke De Buitrago, Sybille 2020: Radikalisierung, Online-Diskurse und Emotionen, in: Koschut, Simon (Hrsg.) Emotionen in den internationalen Beziehungen. Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  722. Salmons, Janet E. 2015: Conducting Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Online, in: Hesse-Biber, Sharlene/Johnson, R. Burke (Hrsg.) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  723. Singer, P. W./Brooking, Emerson T. 2018: Like War. The Weaponization of Social Media, Boston, MA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  724. Snelson, Chareen L. 2016: Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods; 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  725. Sold, Manjana 2020: The Amalgamation of Virtuality and Reality in Radicalisation Processes. in: https://gnet-research.org/2020/04/23/the-amalgamation-of-virtuality-and-reality-in-ra dicalisation-processes/; 11.10.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  726. Sold, Manjana/Abay Gaspar, Hande/Junk, Julian 2020: Designing Research on Radicalisation using Social Media Content: Data Protection Regulations as Challenges and Opportunities, in: Günther, Christoph/Pfeifer, Simone (Hrsg.), Jihadi Audiovisuality and its Entanglements. Meanings, Aesthetics, Appropriations, Edinburgh, 51-73.. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  727. Sold, Manjana/Junk, Julian 2021: Researching Extremist Content on Social Media Platforms: Data Protection and Research Ethics Challenges and Opportunities. London: The Global Network on Extremism and Technology (GNET), in: https://gnet-research.org/wp-conte nt/uploads/2021/01/GNET-Report-Researching-Extremist-Content-Social-Media-Ethics. pdf; 15.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  728. Sold, Manjana/Süß, Clara-Auguste 2020a: The Coronavirus as a Means to an End: Extremist Reinterpretations of the Pandemic, in: https://gnet-research.org/2020/04/08/the-coronavirus-as-a-means-to-an-end-extremist-reinterpretations-of-the-pandemic/; 20.4.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  729. Sold, Manjana/Süß, Clara-Auguste. 2020b. Das Virus als Mittel zum Zweck: Extremistische (Um-)Deutungen der Corona-Pandemie. in: https://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/ ra dikalisierungspraevention/308634/das-virus-als-mittel-zum-zweck-extremistische-um-d eutungen-der-corona-pandemie; 20.5.2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  730. Spalek, Basia 2012: Introducing Counter-Terrorism Studies, in: Spalek, Basia (Hrsg.) Counter-Terrorism. London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  731. Vale, Gina 2018: Cubs in the Lions’ Den: Indoctrination and Recruitment of Children Within Islamic State Territory. London: ICSR, in: https://icsr.info/wp-content/uploads/ 2018/07/ Cubs-in-the-Lions-Den-Indoctrination-and-Recruitment-of-Children-Within-Islamic-Sta te-Territory.pdf; 19.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  732. Veltri, Giuseppe A./Atanasova, Dimitrinka 2017: Climate Change on Twitter: Content, Media Ecology and Information Sharing Behaviour. Public Understanding of Science, 26: 6, 721-737. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  733. Wahlström, Mattias/Törnberg, Anton/Ekbrand, Hans 2020: Dynamics of Violent and Dehumanizing Rhetoric in Far-right Social Media. New Media & Society, 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  734. Weimann, Gabriel/Jost, Jannis 2015: Neuer Terrorismus und Neue Medien. Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik, 8: 3, 369-388. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  735. Weimann, Gabriel/Masri, Natalie 2020: Research Note: Spreading Hate on TikTok. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1-14. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  736. Winter, Charlie 2015: The Virtual ‘Caliphate’: Understanding Islamic State’s Propaganda Strategy, in: Quilliam (Hrsg.). London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  737. Winter, Charlie 2016: Special Report: An Integrated Approach to Islamic State Recruitment. Australian Strategic Policy Institute, in: https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-inte rest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/resources/docs/An%20integrated% 20approach Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  738. %20to%20Islamic%20State%20recruitmen.pdf; 5.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  739. Zywietz, Bernd 2020: Formen, Funktionen und Dimensionen extremistischer Online-Propaganda im Web 2.0 – Herausforderungen und Untersuchungsansätze, in: Schmitt, Josephine B./Ernst, Julian/Rieger, Diana/Roth, Hans-Joachim (Hrsg.) Propaganda und Prävention Forschungsergebnisse, didaktische Ansätze, interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zur pädagogischen Arbeit zu extremistischer Internetpropaganda. Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  740. Zywietz, Bernd/Beese, Yorck 2020: Appropriation in Islamic State Propaganda: A Theoretical and Analytical Framework of Types and Dimensions, in: Günther, Christoph/Pfeifer, Simone (Hrsg.) Jihadi Audiovisuality and its Entanglements. Edinburgh. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-167
  741. Adler, Emanuel/Drieschova, Alena 2021: The epistemological challenge of truth subversion to the Liberal International Order, in: International Organization 75: 2, 359-386. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  742. Pinchbeck, Hannah 2018: Using Social Media for Social Good by Amnesty International USA, (Digital Marketing World Forum, online first), in: https://www.digitalmarketing-c onference.com/using-social-media-for-social-good-with-amnesty-international-usa/; 22.2.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  743. Alonso-Cañadas, Juana/Galán-Valdivieso, Federico/Saraite-Sariene, Laura/Caba-Perez, María del Carmen 2019: Unpacking the drivers of stakeholder engagement in sustainable water management: NGOs and the use of facebook, in: Water 11: 4, 775. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  744. Baringhorst, Sigrid 2015: Konsum und Lebensstile als politische Praxis–Systematisierende und historisch kontextualisierende Annährungen, in: Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 28: 2, 17-27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  745. Baringhorst, Sigrid/Yang, Mundo/Voss, Kathrin/Villioth, Lisa 2017: Webzentrierte Hybridkampagnen – Ausdruck postdemokratischer Protestpartizipation?, in: Priska, Daphi/ Deitelhoff, Nicole/Rucht, Dieter/Teune, Simon (Hrsg.): Protest in Bewegung?: Zum Wandel von Bedingungen, Formen und Effekten politischen Protests, Band 33, 1. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 171-197. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  746. Bennett, W. Lance/Segerberg, Alexandra 2011: Digital media and the personalization of collective action: Social technology and the organization of protests against the global economic crisis, in: Information, Communication & Society 14: 6, 770-799. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  747. Bennett, W. Lance/Segerberg, Alexandra 2012: The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics, in: Information, Communication & Society 15: 5, 739-768. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  748. Blühdorn, Ingolfur 2013: Simulative Demokratie: neue Politik nach der postdemokratischen Wende, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  749. Bob, Clifford 2002: Merchants of morality, in: Foreign Policy (129), 36-45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  750. Bonacker, Thorsten/Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 2013: Entstehung und Zerfall von Autorität in der Weltpolitik. Eine differenzierungstheoretische Perspektive, in: Stetter, Stephan (Hrsg.): Ordnung und Wandel in der Weltpolitik: Konturen einer Soziologie der Internationalen Beziehungen, 1. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 151-176. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  751. Bouvier, Gwen 2020: From ‘echo chambers’ to ‘chaos chambers’: Discursive coherence and contradiction in the #MeToo Twitter feed, in: Critical Discourse Studies (online first) 1-17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  752. Brough, Melissa 2012: Fair vanity: The visual culture of humanitarianism in the age of commodity activism, in: Mukherjee, Roopali/Banet-Weise, Sarah (Hrsg.): Commodity activism: Cultural resistance in neoliberal times, New York, 174-194. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  753. Bruns, Axel/Burgess, Jean 2015: Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics, in: Rambukkana, Nathan (Hrsg.): Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks, New York, 13-27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  754. Budabin, Alexandra C./Pruce, Joel R. 2018: The elite politics of media advocacy in human rights, in: New Political Science 40: 4, 744-762. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  755. Burke, Barbara Ruth/ Şen, Ayşe Fulya 2018: Social media choices and uses: comparing Turkish and American young-adults’ social media activism, in: Palgrave Communications 4: 1, 1-10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  756. Carpenter, Charli/Duygulu, Sirin/Montgomery, Alexander H./Rapp, Anna 2014: Explaining the advocacy agenda: Insights from the human security network, in: International Organization 68: 2, 449-470. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  757. Castells, Manuel 2015: Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  758. CEV 2010: Effectively Communicating volunteering: The role of PR, Media and Raising Public Awareness, Valencia, Spain; 28th-30th April 2010. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  759. Cooley, Alexander/Ron, James 2002: The NGO Scramble. Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action, in: International Security 27: 1, 5-39. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  760. Darius, Philipp/Stephany, Fabian 2019: “Hashjacking” the Debate: Polarisation Strategies of Germany’s Political Far-Right on Twitter, in: Weber, Ingmar/Darwish, Kareem M./ Wagner, Claudia/Zagheni, Emilio/Nelson, Laura/Aref, Samin/Flöck, Fabian (Hrsg.): Social Informatics, Cham, 298-308. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  761. Debord, Guy 1996: Die Gesellschaft des Spektakels, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  762. della Porta, Donatella 2013: Can democracy be saved? Participation, deliberation and social movements, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  763. Dryzek, John S./Bächtiger, André/Chambers, Simone/Cohen, Joshua/Druckman, James N./Felicetti, Andrea/Fishkin, James S./Farrell, David M./Fung, Archon/Gutmann, Amy 2019: The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation, in: Science 363: 6432, 1144-1146. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  764. Foos, Florian/Kostadinov, Lyubomir/Marinov, Nikolay/Schimmelfennig, Frank 2020: Does Social Media Promote Civic Activism? A Field Experiment with a Civic Campaign, in: Political Science Research and Methods 9: 3, 500-518. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  765. Frantz, Christiane 2019: NGOs und Fridays for Future: Überlegungen zur politischen Passung und strukturellen Kooperationsfähigkeit, in: Indes 8: 3, 55-74. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  766. Friedman, Monroe 2004: Using Consumer Boycotts to Stimulate Corporate Policy Changes: Marketplace, Media, and Moral Considerations, in: Micheletti, Michele/Follesdal, Andreas/Stolle, Dietlind (Hrsg.): Politics, Products, and Markets. Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present, New Brunswick, 45-62. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  767. Gerbaudo, Paolo 2017: The mask and the flag: Populism, citizenism, and global protest, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  768. Gillespie, Tarleton 2018: Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media, New Haven & London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  769. Greenpeace Schweiz 2020: Marketing und Influencer Manager*in, 80%, Greenpeace Schweiz, in: https://www.kampajobs.ch/job/marketing-und-influencer-managerin-80; 24.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  770. Gregory, Sam 2012: Kony 2012 through a prism of video advocacy practices and trends, in: Journal of Human Rights Practice 4: 3, 463-468. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  771. Hahn, Kristina/Holzscheiter, Anna 2013: The Ambivalence of Advocacy: Representation and Contestation in Global NGO Advocacy for Child Workers and Sex Workers, in: Global Society 27: 4, 497-520. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  772. Hall, Nina/Schmitz, Hans Peter/Dedmon, J. Michael 2020: Transnational advocacy and NGOs in the digital era: New forms of networked power, in: International Studies Quarterly 64: 1, 159-167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  773. Han-Broich, Misun 2012: Ehrenamt und Integration: Die Bedeutung sozialen Engagements in der (Flüchtlings-) Sozialarbeit, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  774. Hargittai, Eszter/Piper, Anne Marie/Morris, Meredith Ringel 2019: From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults, in: Universal Access in the Information Society 18: 4, 881-890. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  775. Hemsley, Jeff/Stromer-Galley, Jennifer/Semaan, Bryan/Tanupabrungsun, Sikana 2018: Tweeting to the Target: Candidates’ Use of Strategic Messages and @Mentions on Twitter, in: Journal of Information Technology & Politics 15: 1, 3-18. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  776. Herman, Johanna 2014: Hashtags and human rights: Activism in the age of Twitter, in: Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, Carnegie Ethics Online Monthly Column (online first), https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/ethics_online/0099. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  777. Hickman, David 2012: Jason and the Internauts, in: Journal of Human Rights Practice 4: 3, 475-480. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  778. Hudders, Liselot/De Jans, Steffi/De Veirman, Marijke 2021: The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers, in: International Journal of Advertising 40: 3, 327-375. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  779. Jäger, Hans Martin 2007: „Global Civil Society“ and the Political Depoliticization of Global Governance, in: International Political Sociology 1: 3, 257-277. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  780. Joachim, Jutta/Schneiker, Andrea 2018: Humanitarian NGOs as Businesses and Managers: Theoretical Reflection on an Under-Explored Phenomenon, in: International Studies Perspectives 19: 2, 170-187. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  781. Kanai, Akane/McGrane, Caitlin 2020: Feminist filter bubbles: ambivalence, vigilance and labour, in: Information, Communication & Society (online first), DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1760916. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  782. Karpf, David 2016: Analytic activism: Digital listening and the new political strategy, New York, NY. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  783. Keck, Margaret E./Sikkink, Kathryn 1998: Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  784. Kneuer, Marianne/Richter, Saskia 2018: Empörungsbewegungen: Der Einfluss von sozialen Medien auf die Protestbewegungen seit 2011, in: Remus, Nadine/Rademacher, Lars (Hrsg.): Handbuch NGO-Kommunikation, Wiesbaden, 249-276. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  785. Lim, Ming/Moufahim, Mona 2015: The spectacularization of suffering: an analysis of the use of celebrities in ‘Comic Relief’ UK’s charity fundraising campaigns, in: Journal of Marketing Management 31: 5-6, 525-545. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  786. Madden, Stephanie/Janoske, Melissa/Briones, Rowena L. 2016: The double-edged crisis: Invisible children’s social media response to the Kony 2012 campaign, in: Public relations review 42: 1, 38-48. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  787. Maeckelbergh, Marianne 2011: Doing is Believing: Prefiguration as Strategic Practice in the Alterglobalization Movement, in: Social Movement Studies 10: 1, 1-20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  788. McDonald, Kevin 2015: From Indymedia to Anonymous: rethinking action and identity in digital cultures, in: Information, Communication & Society 18: 8, 968-982. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  789. Meraz, Sharon 2017: Hashtag wars and networked framing: The private/public networked protest repertoires of occupy on twitter, in: Serrano Tellería, Ana (Hrsg.): Between the public and private in mobile communication, Routledge, 303-323. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  790. Milan, Stefania 2015: From social movements to cloud protesting: the evolution of collective identity, in: Information, Communication & Society 18: 8, 887-900. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  791. Moore, Jason W. 2015: Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  792. Morozov, Evgeny 2009: Iran: Downside to the" Twitter revolution", in: Dissent 56: 4, 10-14. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  793. Mukherjee, Roopali/Banet-Weiser, Sarah 2012: Commodity activism: Cultural resistance in neoliberal times, New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  794. Mutua, Makau 2001: Savages, victims, and saviors: The metaphor of human rights, in: Harvard International Law Journal 42: 1, 201-245. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  795. Norris, Pippa/Inglehart, Ronald 2009: Cosmopolitan Communications, 2. Auflage, Cambridge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  796. Papacharissi, Zizi 2016: Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality, in: Information, Communication & Society 19: 3, 307-324. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  797. Poell, Thomas/Van Dijck, José 2015: Social Media and Activist Communication, in: Atton, Chris (Hrsg.): in: The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media, London, 527-537. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  798. Priller, Eckhard 2011: Dynamik, Struktur und Wandel der Engagementforschung: Rückblick, Tendenzen und Anforderungen, in: Priller, Eckhard/Alscher, Mareike/Dathe, Dietmar/ Speth, Rudolf (Hrsg.): Zivilengagement. Herausforderungen für Gesellschaft, Politik und Wissenschaft, Berlin & Münster, Band 2, 11-40. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  799. Pruce, Joel R. 2017: What does human rights look like? The visual culture of aid, advocacy, and activism, in: Monshipouri, Mahmood (Hrsg.): Information Politics, Protests, and Human Rights in the Digital Age, Cambridge, 50-72. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  800. Rahmann, Ute 1999: Freiwilliges soziales Engagement im Wandel: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Förderung auf kommunaler Ebene, Aachen. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  801. Razsa, Maple/Kurnik, Andrej 2012: The Occupy Movement in Žižek’s hometown: Direct democracy and a politics of becoming, in: American Ethnologist 39: 2, 238-258. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  802. Repo, Jemima 2020: Feminist commodity activism: The new political economy of feminist protest, in: International Political Sociology 14: 2, 215-232. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  803. Schürmann, Lisa Katrin 2013: Motivation und Anerkennung im freiwilligen Engagement: Kampagnen und ihre Umsetzung in Internet und Social Media, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  804. Sending, Ole J./Neumann, Iver B. 2006: Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power, in: International Studies Quarterly 50: 3, 651-672. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  805. Shaw, Frances 2013: Still ‘Searching for Safety Online’: collective strategies and discursive resistance to trolling and harassment in a feminist network, in: The Fibreculture Journal 22, 92-108. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  806. Singh, Angela 2018: 12 inspiring human rights activists to follow in 2018, Amnesty International, in: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2018/01/inspiring-people-to-foll ow-on-social-media/; 24.1.2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  807. Tufekci, Zeynep 2017: Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest, London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  808. von Engelhardt, Johannes/Jansz, Jeroen 2014: Challenging humanitarian communication: An empirical exploration of Kony 2012, in: International Communication Gazette 76: 6, 464-484. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  809. Voss, Kathrin 2013: Campact & Co – Wie Hybridorganisationen das Grassrootscampaigning verändern, in: Speth, Rudolf (Hrsg.): Grassroots-Campaigning, Wiesbaden, 213-224. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  810. Wahlström, Mattias/./Kocyba, P./de Vydt, M/. De Moor, J. (Hrsg.) 2019: Protest for a future: Composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays For Future climate protests on 15 March, 2019 in 13 European cities. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  811. Waldorf, Lars 2012: White noise: Hearing the disaster, in: Journal of Human Rights Practice 4: 3, 469-474. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  812. Xiong, Ying/Cho, Moonhee/Boatwright, Brandon 2019: Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement, in: Public relations review 45: 1, 10-23. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181
  813. Yates, Luke 2020: Prefigurative Politics and Social Movement Strategy: The Roles of Prefiguration in the Reproduction, Mobilisation and Coordination of Movements, in: Political Studies (online first), DOI: 10.1177/0032321720936046. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-181

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien