Race, Traditionen des konservativen Anti-Intellektualismus und autokratische Projekte: Eine Historisierung der Bildungspolitik unter Trump

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Leviathan Jahrgang 53 (2025), Heft 4
Open Access Vollzugriff

Leviathan

Jahrgang 53 (2025), Heft 4

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
1861-8588
ISSN-Print
0340-0425

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 53 (2025), Heft 4

Race, Traditionen des konservativen Anti-Intellektualismus und autokratische Projekte: Eine Historisierung der Bildungspolitik unter Trump

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
0340-0425
ISSN-Online
1861-8588
Kapitelvorschau:

Der Beitrag analysiert die auf den Bildungsbereich fokussierte (Exekutiv-)Politik der beiden Amtszeiten Donald Trumps aus einer genealogischen Perspektive, die sich auf die anti-intellektuellen Traditionen im US-amerikanischen Konservatismus ab den 1950ern und insbesondere auf ihre race-Bezüge konzentriert. Dies macht die tiefe Verankerung bestimmter Rationalisierungsmuster und Kontestationsinitiativen sichtbar, die in der Trump-Regierung reartikuliert, radikalisiert und rekombiniert werden, um ihr autokratisches, anti-modernes politisches Projekt zu legitimieren.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Adams, Glen 1970. The UNESCO Controversy in Los Angeles, 1951–1953. A Case Study of the Influence of Right-Wing Groups on Urban Affairs. Dissertation, University of Southern California. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Associated Press 2005. „Bush: Schools Should Teach Intelligent Design“, NBC News (2. August 2005). https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8792302. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Bauer, Michael; Becker, Stefan 2020. „Democratic Backsliding, Populism, and Public Administration“, in Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3, 1, 19–31. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Bebout, Lee 2020. „Weaponizing Victimhood: Discourses of Oppression and the Maintenance of Supremacy on the Right“, in News on the Right, hrsg. v. Nadler, Anthony; Bauer, A.J., S. 64–83. New York: Oxford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Benowitz, June 2009. „Reading, Writing and Radicalism: Right-Wing Women and Education in the Post-War Years“, in History of Education Quarterly 49, 1, S. 89–111. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Benowitz, June 2017. Challenge and Change: Right-Wing Women, Grassroots Activism, and the Baby Boom Generation. Gainesville: UP of Florida. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Bermeo, Nancy 2016. „On Democratic Backsliding“, in Journal of Democracy 27, 1, S. 5–19. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Biebricher, Thomas 2024. „The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective“, in Politische Vierteljahresschrift 65, 2, S. 233–259. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo 2015. „The Structure of Racism in Color-Blind, ‚Post-Racial‘ America“, in American Behavioral Scientist 59, 11, S. 1358–1376. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Bowling, Cynthia; Pickerill, J. Mitchell 2013. „Fragmented Federalism: The State of American Federalism 2012–13”, in Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43, 3, S. 315–346. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Brückmann, Rebecca 2021. Massive Resistance and Southern Womanhood: White Women, Class, and Segregation. Politics and Culture in the Twentieth-Century South. Atlanta: University of Georgia Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Buckley Jr., William F. 1955. „Publisher’s Statement“, in National Review, 19. November 1955. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Buckley Jr., William F. 2021 [1951]. God and Man at Yale. The Superstitions of “Academic Freedom”. New York: Regnery. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Carl, Jeremy 2024. The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism Is Tearing America Apart. New York: Regnery. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Carlson, Tucker 2022. „The Great Replacement Is an Electoral Strategy“, Fox News (19. Juli 2022). https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-great-replacement-electoral-strategy. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Davey, Jacob; Ebner Julia 2019. ‚The Great Replacement‘: The Violent Consequences of Mainstreamed Extremism. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. London. https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/the-great-replacement-the-violent-consequences-of-mainstreamed-extremism/. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Eastland, James O. 1955. The Supreme Court’s „Modern Scientific Authorities“ in the Segregation Cases. Speech in the Senate of the United States, 26. Mai 2955. Washington, D.C. https://archive.org/details/1955Eastland/mode/2up. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Eckes, Suzanne E.; Mead, Julie; Ulm, Jessica 2016. „Dollars to Discriminate: The (Un)Intended Consequences of School Vouchers“, in Peabody Journal of Education 91, 4, S. 537–458. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Flanagan, Coral; Wong, Kenneth 2025. „The Administrative Presidency and PK ‐12 Education Policy: Student Rights and Oversight During the Trump and Biden Era“, in Public Administration Review 85, 4, S. 1173–86. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Formisano, Ronald 2012. Boston against Busing: Race, Class, and Ethnicity in the 1960s and 1970s. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Foucault, Michel 1977. „Nietzsche, Genealogy, History“, in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, hrsg. v. Bouchard, Donald, S. 139–164. Ithaca: Cornell UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Fried, Amy; Harris, Douglas 2021. At War with Government: How Conservatives Weaponized Distrust from Goldwater to Trump. New York: Columbia UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Fusarelli, Lance; Fusarelli, Bonnie 2014. „Federal Education Policy from Reagan to Obama“, in Handbook of Education Politics and Policy hrsg. v. Cooper, Bruce; Cibulka, James; Fusarelli, Lance, 189–209. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Georgia House of Representatives. 1957. Resolution, HR No. 174–554d. Atlanta. https://ia601304.us.archive.org/8/items/A1957GeorgiaResolution/A%201957%20Georgia%20Resolution_text.pdf. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Gillespie McRae, Elizabeth 2018. Mothers of Massive Resistance: White Women and the Politics of White Supremacy. New York: Oxford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Giroux, Henry 2005. „The Conservative Assault on America: Cultural Politics, Education and the New Authoritarianism“, in Cultural Politics 1, 2, S. 139–164. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Goldberg, David Theo 2006. The Racial State. Malden: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Goldstein, Joel K. 2008. „Not Hearing History: A Critique of Chief Justice Robert’s Reinterpretation of Brown“, in Ohio State Law Journal 69, 5, S. 791–846. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Gotanda, Neil 1991. „A Critique of ‚Our Constitution Is Color-Blind‘“, in Stanford Law Review 44, 1, S. 1–68. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Gross, Ariela 2019. „A Grassroots History of Colorblind Conservative Constitutionalism“, in Law & Social Inquiry 44, 1, S. 58–77. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Grumbach, Jacob 2022. Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics. Princeton: Princeton UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Grumbach, Jacob; Michener, Jamila 2022. „American Federalism, Political Inequality, and Democratic Erosion“, in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 699, 1, S. 143–155. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Hackett, Ursula; King, Desmond 2019. „The Reinvention of Vouchers for a Color-Blind Era: A Racial Orders Account“, in Studies in American Political Development 33, 2, S. 234–257. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Hammer, Josh 2024. „The Case for Education Secretary Justice”, in Newsweek (11. November 2024). https://www.newsweek.com/case-education-secretary-justice-opinion-1984030. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Haney López, Ian 2007. „‚A Nation of Minorities‘: Race, Ethnicity, and Reactionary Colorblindness”, Stanford Law Review 59, 4, S. 985–1064. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Hausman, William; Neufeld, John 2011. „How Politics, Economics, and Institutions Shaped Electric Utility Regulation in the United States: 1879–2009“, in Business History 53, 5, S. 723–746. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Hayter, Julian 2023. „Edward Blum’s Crusade against Affirmative Action Has Used the Legal Strategy Developed by Civil Rights Activists“, in The Conversation (30. November 2023). https://theconversation.com/edward-blums-crusade-against-affirmative-action-has-used-the-legal-strategy-developed-by-civil-rights-activists-215223. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Hemmer, Nicole 2017. „From ‚Faith in Facts‘ to ‚Fair and Balanced‘: Conservative Media, Liberal Bias, and the Origins of Balance”, in Media Nation hrsg. v. Schulman, Bruce; Zelitzer, Julian, S. 126–143. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Henig, Jeffrey; Jacobse, Rebecca; Reckhow, Sarah 2019. Outside Money in School Board Elections: The Nationalization of Education Politics. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Hertel-Fernandez, Alex 2019. State Capture: How Conservative Activists, Big Businesses, and Wealthy Donors Reshaped the American States – and the Nation. New York: Oxford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Himmelstein, Jerome 1992. To the Right: The Transformation of American Conservatism. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Hinger, Sarah 2018. „Meet Edward Blum, the Man Who Wants to Kill Affirmative Action in Higher Education“, ACLU (18. Oktober 2018). https://www.aclu.org/news/racial-justice/meet-edward-blum-man-who-wants-kill-affirmative-action-higher. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Hübner, Andreas; Steffensen, Nils 2024. Antiintellektualismus: Ein unwahrscheinlicher Klassiker, Kiel: Universitätsverlag Kiel. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Hofstadter, Richard 1979 [1963]. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Hofstadter, Richard 2012 [1962]. Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. Westminster: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Horwitz, Robert 2013. America’s Right: Anti-Establishment Conservatism from Goldwater to the Tea Party. Malden: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Jardina, Ashley 2019. White Identity Politics. New York: Cambridge UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Joffe-Block, Jude; Yousef, Odette 2024. „How Trump Is Relying on a Racist Conspiracy Theory to Question Election Results“, NPR (13. September 2024). https://www.npr.org/2024/09/13/g-s1-22583/trump-great-replacement-conspiracy-theory. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Keck, Thomas 2022. „Court-Packing and Democratic Erosion“, Democratic Resilience, hrsg. v. Lieberman, Robert; Mettler, Suzanne; Roberts, Kenneth, S. 141–168. New York: Cambridge UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Kilpatrick, James 1962. The Southern Case for School Segregation. Springfield: Crowell-Collier Publishing Company. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Kochi, Tarik 2023. „Authoritarian Populism, Democracy and the Long Counter-Revolution of the Radical Right“, in Contemporary Political Theory 22, 4, S. 439–459. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Kruse, Kevin 2015. One Nation Under God. How Corporate America Invented Christian America. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Kukec, Marko; Simon, Julia; Stenberg, Matthew 2025. „Rule of Law Backsliding across Regime Types: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Party Cohesion in Shaping Backsliding Dynamics“, in Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Online First: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-025-00645-y. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Laats, Adam 2015. The Other School Reformers: Conservative Activism in American Education. Cambridge: Harvard UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Lane, Julie 2019. „Cultivating Distrust of the Mainstream Media“, in News on the Right: Studying Conservative News Cultures, hrsg. v. Nadler, Anthony; Bauer, A.J., 157–173. New York: Oxford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Lassiter, Matthew. 2010. „De Jure/De Facto Segregation: The Long Shadow of a National Myth“, in The Myth of Southern Exceptionalism, hrsg. v. Lassiter, Matthew; Crespino, Joseph, S. 25–48, New York: Oxford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Lassiter, Matthew 2004. „The Suburban Origins of ‚Color-Blind‘ Conservatism: Middle-Class Consciousness in the Charlotte Busing Crisis“, Journal of Urban History 30, 4, S. 549–582. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Lassiter, Matthew 2006. The Silent Majority: Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South. Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton: Princeton UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Lassiter, Matthew 2007. „The ‚Color-Blind‘ Inversion of Civil Rights History“, Revue Française d’études Américaines 113, 3, S. 65–69. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Levitsky, Steven; Ziblatt, Daniel 2018. How Democracies Die. London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Lowndes, Joseph 2008. From the New Deal to the New Right: Race and the Southern Origins of Modern Conservatism. New Haven: Yale UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Luscombe, Richard 2022. „Scrutiny of Republicans Who Embrace ‚Great Replacement Theory‘ after Buffalo Massacre“, in The Guardian (16. Mai 2022). https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/16/buffalo-massacre-great-replacement-theory-republicans. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Lütjen, Torben 2024. „Vom ‚Common Sense‘ zu den ‚Alternative Facts‘ : Varianten des Antiintellektualismus im U.S.-amerikanischen Konservatismus nach 1945“, in Antiintellektualismus: Ein unwahrscheinlicher Klassiker, hrsg. v. Hübner, Andreas; Steffensen, Nils, S. 147–160, Kiel: Universitätsverlag Kiel. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Major, Mark 2012. „Objective but Not Impartial: Human Events, Barry Goldwater, and the Development of the ‚Liberal Media‘ in the Conservative Counter-Sphere“, in New Political Science 34, 4, S. 455–468. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Maxwell, Angie 2014. The Indicted South: Public Criticism, Southern Inferiority, and the Politics of Whiteness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. McGirr, Lisa 2015. Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right. New edition. Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton: Princeton UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. McRae, Elizabeth 2018. Mothers of Massive Resistance: White Women and the Politics of White Supremacy. New York: Oxford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Meckler, Laura 2025. „Under Trump, the Education Dept. Has Flipped Its Civil Rights Mission“, Washington Post (18. August 2025). https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/08/18/trump-education-department-civil-rights/. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Mickey, Robert 2015. Paths out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America’s Deep South, 1944–1972. Princeton: Princeton UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Mitchell, Edna 1989. „The Reagan Education Agenda: Successes and Setbacks“, in Teacher Education Quarterly Spring 1989, S. 5–20. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Mooney, Chris 2006. The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Moreton, Bethany 2010. To Serve God and Wal-Mart: The Making of Christian Free Enterprise. Cambridge: Harvard UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Moynihan, Donald 2021. „Populism and the Deep State: The Attack on Public Service Under Trump“, in Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration, hrsg. v. Bauer, Michael; Peters, Guy, Pierre, Jon; Yesilkagit, Kutsal; Becker, Stefan, S. 151–177. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Moynihan, Donald; Roberts, Alasdair 2010. „The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence: The Bush Administration and the Exhaustion of the Politicized Presidency“, in Public Administration Review 70, 4, S. 572–581. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Muirhead, Russell; Rosenblum, Nancy 2022. „The Path from Conspiracy to Ungoverning“, in Social Research: An International Quarterly 89, 3, S. 501–24. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Natanson, Hannah; Tierney, Lauren; Morse, Clara 2024. „America has legislated itself into competing red, blue versions of education”, in Washington Post, 4. April 2024. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/04/04/education-laws-red-blue-divide/. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Nash, George 1979. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Nemeth, Julian 2020. „The Passion of William F. Buckley: Academic Freedom, Conspiratorial Conservatism, and the Rise of the Postwar Right”, in Journal of American Studies 54, 2, S. 323–350. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Nickerson, Michelle 2012. Mothers of Conservatism: Women and the Postwar Right. Princeton: Princeton UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Nixon, Richard 1972. Statement on School Busing, 17. März 1972. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik 2022. „From Anti-Government to Anti-Science: Why Conservatives Have Turned Against Science“, in Daedalus 151, 4, S. 98–123. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Pascoe, Peggy 2009. What Comes Naturally: Miscegenation Law and the Making of Race in America. New York: Oxford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Perez Jr., Juan 2023. „The Parents Group Republicans Are Banking on to Win the White House“, in Politico (30. Juni 2023). https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/30/trump-desantis-white-house-hopefuls-court-maga-moms-at-moms-for-liberty-bash-00104474. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Perez Sheldon, Myrna; Oreskes, Naomi 2017. „The Religious Politics of Scientific Doubt: Evangelical Christians and Environmentalism in the United States“, in The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and Ecology, hrsg. v. Hart, John, S. 348–367. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Perlstein, Rick 2012. „Exclusive: Lee Atwater’s Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy“, in The Nation (13. November 2012). https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy/. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Rigney, Daniel 1991. „Three Kinds of Anti-Intellectualism: Rethinking Hofstadter“, in Sociological Inquiry 61, 4, S. 434–451. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Schulman, Bruce; Zelizer, Julian 2008. Rightward Bound: Making America Conservative in the 1970s. Cambridge: Harvard UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Searls Giroux, Susan 2009. „The Age of Unreason: Race and the Drama of American Anti-Intellectualism“, in JAC 29, 1, S. 295–352. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Searls Giroux, Susan 2010. Between Race and Reason: Violence, Intellectual Responsibility, and the University to Come. Redwood City: Stanford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Shortell, David 2018. „Justice Department Sides with Asian-Americans Suing Harvard over Admissions Policy“, in CNN (30. August 2018). https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/30/politics/harvard-justice-department-affirmative-action-asian-americans-lawsuit. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Simon, Julia 2025. “An Analytics of Far-Right Populist Contestation and the Case of ‚Awakened Mothers‘ in US Public Education and Beyond”, Global Society, OnlineFirst: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2025.2468946. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Smith, Rogers; King, Desmond 2021. “White Protectionism in America”, Perspectives on Politics 19, 2, 460–478. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Suskind, Ron 2004. „Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush”, in New York Times (17. Oktober 2004). https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/faith-certainty-and-the-presidency-of-george-w-bush.html. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Trump, Donald 2016. Remarks at the Cleveland Arts and Social Sciences Academy. Cleveland, Ohio. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Union of Concerned Scientists 2004. Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policy Making, 18. Februar 2004. https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/kf/RSISS0704.pdf. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Van den Haag, Ernest 1977. „Reverse Discrimination. A Brief Against It“, in National Review (29. April 1977), S. 492–495. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Wallace-Wells, Benjamin 2021. „How a Conservative Activist Invented the Conflict Over Critical Race Theory“, The New Yorker (18. Juni 2021). https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/how-a-conservative-activist-invented-the-conflict-over-critical-race-theory. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Walsh, Camille 2017. „White Backlash, the ‚Taxpaying‘ Public, and Educational Citizenship“, in Critical Sociology 43, 2, S. 237–247. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Welch, Robert 1956. A Letter to the South on Segregation. https://archive.org/details/WELCHRobertALetterToTheSouthOnSegregation. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Williams, Daniel 2010. God’s Own Party: The Making of the Christian Right. New York: Oxford UP. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Wong, Kenneth 2020. „Education Policy Trump Style: The Administrative Presidency and Deference to States in ESSA Implementation“, in Publius: The Journal of Federalism 50, 3, S. 423–445. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Yourish, Karen; Daniel, Annie; Datar, Saurabh; White, Isaac; Gamio, Lazaro 2025. „These Words Are Disappearing in the New Trump Administration“, in New York Times (7. März 2025). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/03/07/us/trump-federal-agencies-websites-words-dei.html?unlocked_article_code=1.2E4.53XY.1m0NVQ_fg5Ls&smid=url-share. (Zugriff vom 03.12.2025) Google Scholar öffnen

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien